Spider-Man 3
Columbia Pictures | Release Date: May 4, 2007
6.5
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 2191 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
1,219
Mixed:
538
Negative:
434
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
9
LukeA.May 5, 2007
This is far from perfect, but it still is a fun and exciting installment into the spider-man franchise. It has plenty of action, laughs as well as serious moments. Its campy and cheesy at times but thats because its a comic book movie. Go in This is far from perfect, but it still is a fun and exciting installment into the spider-man franchise. It has plenty of action, laughs as well as serious moments. Its campy and cheesy at times but thats because its a comic book movie. Go in wanting to have fun and not to critique every little detail.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
PerroD.May 5, 2007
I thought the movie was great. If you go in expecting it to be as great as the first sequel then you might be a bit dissapointed. there are some solid performances from the cast especially from Thomas Haydn Church as Marko Flint and from I thought the movie was great. If you go in expecting it to be as great as the first sequel then you might be a bit dissapointed. there are some solid performances from the cast especially from Thomas Haydn Church as Marko Flint and from James Franco as Harry Osborn/The New Goblin. this one is also alot funnier than the other two movies with peter parker taking on a much more emo/goofy persona at about halfway through the movie. the effects were better this time around and even provided for a few jumps out of my seat. my only beef with this installment is that the ending was kind of awkward and somber and left much to be desired. but besides that the movie was fantastic and will probably be the best movie of the season.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
PeterRollingO.May 5, 2007
In my opinion, the 2nd Spiderman was one of the best superhero movies ever made. It had the perfect balance of character development and action, and flowed smoothly. Because of that lasting impression, I went into the 3rd one with extremely In my opinion, the 2nd Spiderman was one of the best superhero movies ever made. It had the perfect balance of character development and action, and flowed smoothly. Because of that lasting impression, I went into the 3rd one with extremely high expectations - and therein lies the problem. If you took this movie by itself, and you had never seen the first two, you might think this was an incredible flick. And it is... when you compare it to most other comic-based films. But, rather annoyingly, there is a tendency to compare entries of a franchise with each other. In terms of what could have been better about it, it's not that the film is too long (I love long movies, like Lord of the Rings and Braveheart); it's that, in the time allotted, so much is being crammed that you kind of want the filmmakers to do one of two things: (1) either make this into two separate movies, or (2) make it 3 hours long and smooth out the rough edges. It seemed that a lot was left on the cutting room floor in an attempt to keep this under 3 hours. I told the guy sitting next to me that I could have sat another 30 minutes, because the best thing about this series is that the characters are so likeable. Sure, some scenes were dragged out a bit too long (e.g. when Parker has a 'bad'-itude and is strutting his stuff), but that really didn't bother me, because those scenes were funny (this is by far the funniest of the 3 movies). Like I said, it just seemed like the editor got a little "scissors-happy" and, as a result, the film seems choppy at times. Again, this could have been made into 2 phenomenal films or been turned into a "Return of the King-ish" guilty pleasure. Regardless, it was worth my money and I would like to see it again, just to determine if my opinion about it changes after a second helping. A masterpiece it is not, but it does make for a decent superhero movie, and I hope the 4th one gets made.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
JohnnyP.May 5, 2007
A damn good film that exceeded my expectations. Reading from the reviews, I didn't expect much, but hey, it was well worth my time, and I say it's worth more than one viewing.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
AnonymousMCMay 5, 2007
It really ashame the critics are really messing this up.The film has a dark side alot like the comic. I'm so glad that this film doesn't put a warm and fuzzy in everyones heart.It's not suppose to ..A really under appreciatedIt really ashame the critics are really messing this up.The film has a dark side alot like the comic. I'm so glad that this film doesn't put a warm and fuzzy in everyones heart.It's not suppose to ..A really under appreciated film..Maybe Fantastic 4 is more for the critics liking ....a really well crafted film..Nice to see the old Sam ways of story telling ..Thank you Sam Rami.......… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
LewisB.May 5, 2007
Spider-Man 3 is the Lawrence Of Arabia of the superhero movies world. It is epic, sprawling, magnificent, meaningful, beautiful. Anyone who doesn't enjoy this movie must be a pretty spoilt brat or a cynical old misery. For near on three Spider-Man 3 is the Lawrence Of Arabia of the superhero movies world. It is epic, sprawling, magnificent, meaningful, beautiful. Anyone who doesn't enjoy this movie must be a pretty spoilt brat or a cynical old misery. For near on three hours it envelops you in its world and makes you CARE about the characters. How's that for a special effects laden blockbuster, a movie with characters that matter? The comedy works, the emotion works, the action works. Everything Raimi tries comes off. The set pieces are particularly astounding, ranging from an out of control crane to Spidey's numerous battles with the meaty villains on show. Like others, I think this is by far the best of the three (though I loved the first two as well). It's a modern-day classic, an enrapturing fantasy that exhibits all that's best in modern movie making. An experience not to be missed.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
LeeS.May 5, 2007
Deeply flawed masterpeice. I think Sam Raimi didn't have the time needed to give this movie the edit that it needed. With a better cut Raimi could easily remove the worse scenes and improve the poorer and more contrived story elements. Deeply flawed masterpeice. I think Sam Raimi didn't have the time needed to give this movie the edit that it needed. With a better cut Raimi could easily remove the worse scenes and improve the poorer and more contrived story elements. However it will never be as good as Spider-man 2, which was pretty much perfect. There are some really great scenes and amazing action sequences, and the stellar cast help make the movie fun despite a few bad scenes, bad pacing and forced plot elements.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
MicS.May 5, 2007
It was pretty good. Not as good as 2 and 1, and somewhat of a let down only because we've seen it all before. Venom did feel a tiny bit rushed and thrown in at the end. I think it would've benefitted from just having the Sandman. It was pretty good. Not as good as 2 and 1, and somewhat of a let down only because we've seen it all before. Venom did feel a tiny bit rushed and thrown in at the end. I think it would've benefitted from just having the Sandman. Harry could've stayed. Other than that, was cool.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
BillMay 5, 2007
Very disappointed, although I did like the emo Peter Parker, which my friend and I got a good laugh out of.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
SteveA.May 5, 2007
There were a few flaws. However, this movie had too much heart to dislike. I can picture Raimi not being one of the cool kids in school (that was probably someone like Michael Bay or James Cameron). Instead, he was probably the sweet, goofy There were a few flaws. However, this movie had too much heart to dislike. I can picture Raimi not being one of the cool kids in school (that was probably someone like Michael Bay or James Cameron). Instead, he was probably the sweet, goofy kid with a ton of talent and heart.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
WillyMay 5, 2007
Sorry, but this movie is insulting. Is it suppose to be okay that there is no character consistency and any old damn thing can happen as long as a fancy video game demo is thrown at us every forty minutes? To name only a few... he does the Sorry, but this movie is insulting. Is it suppose to be okay that there is no character consistency and any old damn thing can happen as long as a fancy video game demo is thrown at us every forty minutes? To name only a few... he does the upsidedown kiss with the blond girl full on the mouth in front of MJ when he's getting along great with her, the neighbor girl who had a crush on him is thrilled that he and MJ are getting back together, Sandman robs banks violently and brutally tries to kill him, but says he was badgered into doing it (huh?), so he's really a nice guy; of all the people on earth that walking goo could have stuck to it happened to be Spiderman. Please. Let me know when you get back to filmmaking, Sam.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
TylerDrainvilleMay 5, 2007
By far the worst Spider-Man film yet. They did a very poor job with Spidey's dark side and most of the villains here are shallow and pulled off quite badly. There were more laughs in the movie than "wow" moments, which was not what I By far the worst Spider-Man film yet. They did a very poor job with Spidey's dark side and most of the villains here are shallow and pulled off quite badly. There were more laughs in the movie than "wow" moments, which was not what I was expecting. Very disappointed.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
BeauMay 5, 2007
There is a good movie that could have been made of Spider-Man vs Venom, New Goblin or Sandman, but putting all of them together in the same film means that each of them gets the barest of characterization and the action sequences become a There is a good movie that could have been made of Spider-Man vs Venom, New Goblin or Sandman, but putting all of them together in the same film means that each of them gets the barest of characterization and the action sequences become a mess. Kirsten Dunst has little to do but be mistreated throughout the film. Tobey Maguire is simply not believable as a bad boy. Skip this film.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
TaylorP.May 5, 2007
Quite possibly one of the worst movies of the year- and I enjoyed the first two (more the first one). I simply thought that this film is a product of too much money, and too much greed for more money. The characters are shallow, especially Quite possibly one of the worst movies of the year- and I enjoyed the first two (more the first one). I simply thought that this film is a product of too much money, and too much greed for more money. The characters are shallow, especially in my mind Flint Marko one who is characterized as relatively bad throughout the film only to drastically change in the last ten minutes of the film with no warning. In addition to this some of the "dramatic" fight scenes were simply laughable. Overall very disappointing movie, and yes, I would like my money back.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
ChesterJ>May 5, 2007
The special effects are top-notch, absolutely, but it's the amazing camera works and the beautifully interwoven story that gives Spider-Man 3 it's infallible greatness.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
HalB.May 5, 2007
More fun than I thought it would be. Yes, it focuses more on emotion than action at times, but what's wrong with that? There are a couple scenes that fall flat, but the overall story arc moves along nicely, the special effects are good More fun than I thought it would be. Yes, it focuses more on emotion than action at times, but what's wrong with that? There are a couple scenes that fall flat, but the overall story arc moves along nicely, the special effects are good (but don't dominate the film) and the acting is decent. People who give this anything below a 5 are way harsh. The cameo by Bruce Campbell is excellent. And who knew that Dunst cold actually sing? or that Toby could dance a bit?… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
JoeAverageMay 5, 2007
...Nice to see Topher Grace find some work...er, yeah...
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
BrianMay 5, 2007
Quite simply, the most boring movie I really wanted to like. Topher Grace is a Horrible !!!! Edie Brock and an even worse Venom. Venom being my favorite Marvel character I refuse to watch this Abomination ever again if I can help it. This is Quite simply, the most boring movie I really wanted to like. Topher Grace is a Horrible !!!! Edie Brock and an even worse Venom. Venom being my favorite Marvel character I refuse to watch this Abomination ever again if I can help it. This is such a disappointment and too long!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
AndrewCMay 5, 2007
This Movie in my opinion is the best of the trilogy, It has new exciting villians which overpower the villians of the last two installments. There are however a few moments in the movie where you wonder why Raimi twists the story. Other than This Movie in my opinion is the best of the trilogy, It has new exciting villians which overpower the villians of the last two installments. There are however a few moments in the movie where you wonder why Raimi twists the story. Other than that, Spider Man gives off a new personality that pleased me throughout the movie. Overall, Spider Man 3 keeps you on the edge of your seat wanting more from the from the screen, and hopefuly, more installments of the series from Sam Raimi.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
CamD.May 5, 2007
Almost flawless. This was absolutely amazing and I am completely lost as to how anyone could have disliked this movie. This is pure gold. I will never forget this movie in my life, simply because the story was surprising, fun, funny, and Almost flawless. This was absolutely amazing and I am completely lost as to how anyone could have disliked this movie. This is pure gold. I will never forget this movie in my life, simply because the story was surprising, fun, funny, and unpredictable, as well as the fight scenes were the best I have ever seen in any superhero movie let alone any movie. And let's not forget when spider-man fights with his best friend. Have we all forgotten what these movies are about? Absolutely amazing. I paid 15 bucks for advanced tickets to IMAX, and I would have paid 30.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
LeightonJ.May 5, 2007
This was by far THE worst spidey film released. It took an absolute age to get seriously started and then was over too quickly. That said there wer a couple of funny moments in the film. One thing that made me laugh but maybe shouldn't This was by far THE worst spidey film released. It took an absolute age to get seriously started and then was over too quickly. That said there wer a couple of funny moments in the film. One thing that made me laugh but maybe shouldn't have done was the way they tried to make Tobey Maguire look mean. The guy is weedy and that is why he works so well as spidey. He looked ridiculous when he was trying to look cocky. I hope that if they release a fourth that they will have learnt from their mistakes and actually make a film worth watching and more along the lines of the ACTUAL Spidey comics.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
I.RociterMay 5, 2007
This movie will do well only because Spider-Man 2 was one of the best superhero movies of all time movie goers and fans have come to love the franchise. Spider-Man 3, in contrast, is one of the worst superhero movies and could kill the This movie will do well only because Spider-Man 2 was one of the best superhero movies of all time movie goers and fans have come to love the franchise. Spider-Man 3, in contrast, is one of the worst superhero movies and could kill the franchise in much the same way Batman & Robin did to the caped crusader. Too many villains, poor dialog, bad plot device, terrible pacing, bad editing, a really emo Peter Parker. I could fill the screen with problems and you won't believe me until you see it yourself, but I beg you, if you want to hold that dear memory of Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2 in your memory, do not see this third installment.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
JamesA.May 6, 2007
The flaws of the movie were that it doesn't follow the comic. Venom himself should have been Hulk appearence (not size). The major flaw was that 3 enemies divided the action and no major battles occured unlike Spider-man 2. I say go and The flaws of the movie were that it doesn't follow the comic. Venom himself should have been Hulk appearence (not size). The major flaw was that 3 enemies divided the action and no major battles occured unlike Spider-man 2. I say go and see it, the movie was enjoyable.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
CJawfulMay 6, 2007
The following is just my opinion. I'm utterly correct, but it's just my opinion. I wanted to like this film, but I didn't. It is extremely shallow and disjointed. The dialog is atrocious. The action sequences are pretty good. The following is just my opinion. I'm utterly correct, but it's just my opinion. I wanted to like this film, but I didn't. It is extremely shallow and disjointed. The dialog is atrocious. The action sequences are pretty good. I wish someone had given me the time codes for when the action sequences occur and I would have sat in the hallway until the times came up. I felt embarrassed for Topher Grace. I think he succeeded in making the best out of an extremely poorly written role. James Cromwell. Tobey did fine, but the director needs to remember that less (weeping) is more. (Future directors of Claire Danes, I'm talking to you.) Some of the emotion that Tobey was forced to create from thin air (due to the lousy script) also made me feel embarrassed for him. I fear that some of the odd choices he appeared to make were actually the fault of the editor or director, because several times I found myself asking, "Why did his eyes just widen like crazy? Why is he making that face?" James Franco did fine with poorly written dialog. Kirsten Dunst obviously knows where a body is buried. She emits zero honest emotion in her performance. I defy you to watch a scene from the first movie with your hand over her eyes and then distinguish any difference in the emotional output of her face. I WANT to like her. It's as if she's never gotten out of the line delivery from "Interview with a Vampire." Also, I'm sick of movies preaching to me. Desiring justice and being filled with revenge are NOT the same thing. Reacting to a violent attack with violence does not ALWAYS make the attacker and victim equally guilty of wrongdoing. Did you notice "James Cromwell" earlier in this paragraph? "Why was he stuck in there?" you might ask yourself. That's the same question you'll ask if you see this movie. Thank God for J.K. Simmons. He brought actual acting and comedy to the film. The audience I saw this film with seemed relieved and appreciative to be watching a performance finally. Bruce Campbell also did a good job. Other comedy in Spider-man 3 feels so contrived that it cheapens the entire film. I'm not saying it's not funny, but...well, you'll see. You'll see when you no doubt pay to go see this film and you, like me, will probably have to look at your shoes during the scenes with some of the worst dialog since Jar Jar Binks.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
DanO.May 6, 2007
Well, this movie sucks, It deserves 0 out of 10 but what Can I do? Spider-Man 1 and 2 were indeed great movies, the second one far better than the first one and I only expected the films to climb higher, the ladder broke in some point and Well, this movie sucks, It deserves 0 out of 10 but what Can I do? Spider-Man 1 and 2 were indeed great movies, the second one far better than the first one and I only expected the films to climb higher, the ladder broke in some point and Sam Raimi decided to release a cheesy film about a hero who thinks an EMO hairdo will make him hostile and powerful. The whole movie falls down from the beginning, there's no character development at all because the director tossed a bunch of new villains and focused and the weak one, plus he never lined towards anything, on the contrary, you can easily forgot characters in the middle of the film and suddenly (after almost an hour or so) you'll say "oh yeah, that dude was in the movie right?) to me Spider-Man 3 never existed, download the restaurant sequence and that's it....the whole movie worths only for this SNL sketch :(… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
CalebC.May 6, 2007
The Best of the trilogy. Its exciting, thrilling, dramatic, a bit funny, and weird. The Weird comes from things that the other spiderman movies haven't done. It takes on a different look into comic book films and its set apart from them The Best of the trilogy. Its exciting, thrilling, dramatic, a bit funny, and weird. The Weird comes from things that the other spiderman movies haven't done. It takes on a different look into comic book films and its set apart from them in a tremendous way.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
AlisaH.May 6, 2007
This movie was really good, the acting, humor, action, and the romance. It made you feel and hope this guy makes it through to the end, you go oh crap when peter says something stupid to mj or other things. The only problem I had with the This movie was really good, the acting, humor, action, and the romance. It made you feel and hope this guy makes it through to the end, you go oh crap when peter says something stupid to mj or other things. The only problem I had with the movie was that Venom came in to late. Otherwise, I give kudos and wait anxiously for the next installment.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
TigsJ.May 6, 2007
It gets 3 for the only 3 good parts of it. 1. sandman looked cool 2.bruce campbell 3. venom look midly cool venom got 5 mins screentime all up 5 MINS and he is more famous than sandman. this movie was a chick flick also it wasnt spiderman itIt gets 3 for the only 3 good parts of it. 1. sandman looked cool 2.bruce campbell 3. venom look midly cool venom got 5 mins screentime all up 5 MINS and he is more famous than sandman. this movie was a chick flick also it wasnt spiderman it was peter parker and mary jane. lamest of the series. i went in with high expectations i left demanding my money back.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
MikeC.May 6, 2007
If you go into this movie expecting nothing but flare and glare, then I can understand how you were disappointed. To me, the movie was about the hardships that Peter Parker as a person had to experience. I think they should have followed the If you go into this movie expecting nothing but flare and glare, then I can understand how you were disappointed. To me, the movie was about the hardships that Peter Parker as a person had to experience. I think they should have followed the cartoon for the Symbiote. It seemed to..random. Harry's "amnesia" served no real purpose in the plot, and cramming Venom into the last 15 minutes was extremely disappointing. I think the directors had so many ideas for scenes, that when it came to putting it together, they lost focus on where the story was supposed to be in the end. The first hour+ felt slow-moving, and the last 30+ felt extremely rushed. Very X-Men 3-ish... :/… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
RobertM.May 6, 2007
Spiderman 1 - new way Spidey got his powers Spiderman 2 - Doc Ock was great! Spiderman 3 - Spiderman meets Lifetime network; Tobey McGuire dancing in a jazz club? I mean, come on! This movie is quite possibly the worst one of the three. Spiderman 1 - new way Spidey got his powers Spiderman 2 - Doc Ock was great! Spiderman 3 - Spiderman meets Lifetime network; Tobey McGuire dancing in a jazz club? I mean, come on! This movie is quite possibly the worst one of the three. Topher Grace as Venom is weak-he played Eddie Brock just as he played his character from That 70's show - a whining loser. The introduction of the character, Gwen Stacy, is just in case Kirsten Dunst does not return and considering her lack of script, I doubt she will return.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
TonydannieMay 6, 2007
What is really sad is that X-men 3 was beter then this. I always said this was going to be the Superman 3 of the series. And just like superman tried to take on the Nuclear weapons in the fourth one. Spider-man will take on the Bush What is really sad is that X-men 3 was beter then this. I always said this was going to be the Superman 3 of the series. And just like superman tried to take on the Nuclear weapons in the fourth one. Spider-man will take on the Bush Administration on the next film. For shame.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
JoeR.May 6, 2007
Spiderman 3 is a movie that is incredibly formulaic, with the only break from past convention is a decrease in action, with the empty spots filled by angry coming-of-age conversation. The movie gets a 2/10 for the plot, gains a point for the Spiderman 3 is a movie that is incredibly formulaic, with the only break from past convention is a decrease in action, with the empty spots filled by angry coming-of-age conversation. The movie gets a 2/10 for the plot, gains a point for the wonderful (as usual) performance of James Franco, gains another for the surprisingly brilliant work of Thomas Haden Church, and ultimately falls back to 3/10 due to the cinematography, which consistently finds some way to make Kirsten Dunst look unattractive.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
NateC.May 6, 2007
Better than the last two. You've got the black suit, Sandman, the New Green Goblin, Gwen Stacey, and Venom. Topher Grace as Venom was awesome. I loved it and hope it is not the last.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
AnonymousMCMay 6, 2007
Not as good as the first 2 but still is worth seeing. Tries to mix too many sub-plots, too many characters, and in the end gives solutions that either ar in ahurry or not so convincing. But the humorous stuff are good (even McGuire behavingNot as good as the first 2 but still is worth seeing. Tries to mix too many sub-plots, too many characters, and in the end gives solutions that either ar in ahurry or not so convincing. But the humorous stuff are good (even McGuire behaving as jerk makes u laugh but THAT s the intention, people!), the drama that ALWAYS was there (check the previous Spideys) is here too and action in nevetheless awesome. I expected MORE of course. but to call this a bad movie is WAY out of line...… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
RobB.May 6, 2007
The drama with MJ almost ruined this movie for me. She is like that annoying Jar Jar Binks character in Star Wars I. She needs a much much smaller role in Spiderman 4 or none at all. The special effects were cool, but some were so fast I The drama with MJ almost ruined this movie for me. She is like that annoying Jar Jar Binks character in Star Wars I. She needs a much much smaller role in Spiderman 4 or none at all. The special effects were cool, but some were so fast I could not tell what happened. Overall it was good entertainment and if you liked 1 and 2 then definitely go see this one.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
RichardH.May 7, 2007
Honestly, a lot of people just didn't get this movie, the fact of the matter is, the first two spiderman films came out of nowhere, no one thought they would be good, and they blew everyone away because there was so little expectation, Honestly, a lot of people just didn't get this movie, the fact of the matter is, the first two spiderman films came out of nowhere, no one thought they would be good, and they blew everyone away because there was so little expectation, now that this film had so much hype everyone is suddenly hyper critical of it. The nay sayers can shove off quite frankly, this is a clever, funny, action packed, all round excellent film. It shocks me that people are picking holes in the funny parts of the film for being too cheesy, when that's exactly what they were supposed to be. Honestly, too many morons went out to see this film because of the hype, and that's the only reason a lot of the reviews have been poor. Because the film is anything but.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
MostafaF.May 7, 2007
I saw the movie, and I really think it deserves a 9 out of 10. Even though there are scenes not included in the movie (included in the trailers only and other scenes would have been better if included). Ultimatley, this is the best movie in I saw the movie, and I really think it deserves a 9 out of 10. Even though there are scenes not included in the movie (included in the trailers only and other scenes would have been better if included). Ultimatley, this is the best movie in its trilogy, in terms of its story,effects,acting and the amount of effort and heart that has been put to this movie (two and half years in the making). I really hope that it gets Academy Awards in Effects (Visual and Sound), Editing. For people who haven't seen the movie yet, I highly recomend it and thank you for the readers for your time to read this, I appreciate it.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
AndyH.May 7, 2007
I can only describe this film as a missed opportunity. It could have been an epic, and indeed completed an epic trilogy, possibly one of the best super hero movie series of all time. But it was not. There was no lack of substance, everything I can only describe this film as a missed opportunity. It could have been an epic, and indeed completed an epic trilogy, possibly one of the best super hero movie series of all time. But it was not. There was no lack of substance, everything needed was there to create the movie it should have been. However there was also a lot more than was needed, and it was poorly put together. I do not have a problem with long films, but this should have been shorter. The writers seemed to feel the need to tie up every loose end, which I do not think is necessary or compelling, whether there is to be a sequel or not. Purely from observation it seems there was conflict on what the writers wanted this film to be, which is a shame. All though it is not my place to say how it could be improved, I think the removal of at least one villain would have been a start. Complicated films are good, but they should not be complicated due to an overflow of content, and this type of film should be simple if you wish to view it in such a light. Spider-man 3 is complicated in all the wrong ways.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JosephA.May 7, 2007
Superb. This movie does a fantastic job of blowing you away with amazing action, giving you a good laugh, and touching your heart all @ the same time. It was an excellent finish that beautifully satisfies the story that started in the first Superb. This movie does a fantastic job of blowing you away with amazing action, giving you a good laugh, and touching your heart all @ the same time. It was an excellent finish that beautifully satisfies the story that started in the first film by bringing Peter full circle. I can't for the life off me understand why anyone is complaining or putting the movie down, seriously. It was brilliiant. I'm so glad they didnt mess this up. A perfect trilogy with possibility for amendment. It's definitely my favorite of the 3. Definitely see it!!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
SamC.May 7, 2007
One of the worst movies I have ever seen. The emotional peaks and valleys the director tries to convey are overly dramatic and cheesy. Half of the movie is nothing but choppy conversations and awkward pauses; the other half is special One of the worst movies I have ever seen. The emotional peaks and valleys the director tries to convey are overly dramatic and cheesy. Half of the movie is nothing but choppy conversations and awkward pauses; the other half is special effects that vault so far into the realm of impossibility that one is soon bored with the straining tedium of it all. The only reason I gave it anything out of ten was Aunt May. Rosemary Harris is a gifted actress that has been surrounded by mediocrity throughout the trilogy.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
TomMay 7, 2007
By turns ridiculous and tedious, a piece of garbage. No pacing, no build-up, no suspense, no excitement, nothing holding it all together, just alternating between cartoonish action sequences, and unbelievably tedious and tiresome By turns ridiculous and tedious, a piece of garbage. No pacing, no build-up, no suspense, no excitement, nothing holding it all together, just alternating between cartoonish action sequences, and unbelievably tedious and tiresome pseudo-sentimental conversations. I don't know what happened to the director who made Spiderman 2. Maybe a little black glob of guck came from outer space and took him over. There was one excellent scene, the one where Flint Marko becomes Sandman, which had me saying "Cool!". Too bad there weren't more like it in the film.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
PriyaH.May 7, 2007
The movie is certainly entertaining with its fair share of drama and laughs and should be seen with that intention. If you are hoping for the same depth that was seen in Spiderman 2 you will be disappointed. This movie shows how sequels can The movie is certainly entertaining with its fair share of drama and laughs and should be seen with that intention. If you are hoping for the same depth that was seen in Spiderman 2 you will be disappointed. This movie shows how sequels can go wrong, especially when expectations are so high. In trying to outdo the previous spiderman the makers have gone too big. There is enough material in the movie for perhaps two more different spidermans to be made, resulting in the storylines not being properly and fully dealt with and being sidelines, lost in the race to fit all the action into a 2 hour 20 minute marathon. The effects have gone too big, the stroy too small with the result that the dialogue is corny and the emotional scenes becoming funny.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
MelissaB.May 7, 2007
It was terrible. There was very little entertainment value. Special effects were bad, script was terrible. Bruce Campbell was the only entertaining bit.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
JeffH.May 7, 2007
I went with some very critical friends who really disliked the musical scenes and thought Parker's antics with the dance number were totally unnecessary. My brother and friends hinted that the movie tried to involve or cover too many I went with some very critical friends who really disliked the musical scenes and thought Parker's antics with the dance number were totally unnecessary. My brother and friends hinted that the movie tried to involve or cover too many threads of different characters and such. Did they read or hear about other people's thoughts after opening night? I could have done without the dance scene and pelvis thrust myself, but the combat and special effects were astounding. Yes, there were a few characters to keep track of, but there was just enough background story to give the origin of these characters some substance rather than just throwing up some new villians out of nowhere. I think Sam Raimi could have done a better(different) way of showing Parker's vengeful side, but all in all the movie was pretty good. Keep in mind people - this movie is based upon a comic book character. Comics aren't exactly known for their extraordinary plots.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
PaulD.May 8, 2007
Spider-Man 3 is going to split audiences. Personally, I love it. It has a tremendous blend of humor (Including great inside jokes), action, drama and special effects. However, some people will find certain aspects too cheesy, or miss certain Spider-Man 3 is going to split audiences. Personally, I love it. It has a tremendous blend of humor (Including great inside jokes), action, drama and special effects. However, some people will find certain aspects too cheesy, or miss certain jokes (I was the only person in the packed theatre who reacted to the appearance of Stan Lee for example). I sincerely hope that the reaction is not unjustly bad - it is my favourite of all 3, though I am almost certainly in the minority - as it's no secret that everyone wants a Spider-Man 4.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
Ryan"TheMan"K.May 8, 2007
Though not as superior as it's predecessor "SPIDER-MAN 2" and while it's definitely (in my opinion) better than "SPIDER-MAN", this third installment is exciting, suspenseful and dazzling with more villains, better special F.X and Though not as superior as it's predecessor "SPIDER-MAN 2" and while it's definitely (in my opinion) better than "SPIDER-MAN", this third installment is exciting, suspenseful and dazzling with more villains, better special F.X and some fresh elements. I enjoyed it alot and it should be viewed by many fans of the series!!!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
AlexL.May 8, 2007
This is a good example of how to completely obliterate a franchise. Admitedly the second film wasn't exactly fantastic (requiring some rather large jumps of the imagination, especially due to the preposterous comic book science). It was This is a good example of how to completely obliterate a franchise. Admitedly the second film wasn't exactly fantastic (requiring some rather large jumps of the imagination, especially due to the preposterous comic book science). It was however vaguely loveable, sort of like an ugly puppy with crooked eyes and an insufferable habit of repeatedly yapping to attract attention. This film however was not loveable on any level. The script writing was poor, the acting was abysmal and the evil (emo) Peter Parker was embarrasing. I did however get a good laugh when the sandman fell into the "open air" de-molecularizer. "Sir there seems to be an increased silicon mass in the de-molecularizer"..."Don't worry it's probably just a bird, it'll fly off when the engine gets started". All I can say it must have been a pretty heavy bird to cause a 16 stone rise in weight. It's been a while since I've been so eager to get out of a cinema. Special fx were good, otherwise this would be a 2. If you're a fan of spiderman I would suggest that you don't do it to yourself!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
BlatherscyteBlunderbussMay 8, 2007
Spider Man 2 should have been called Doctor Octopus 1. Where the prior sequel's villain overshadowed the supposed protagonist's weak story arc, in Spider Man 3 the story is all about Parker -- as it should be, IMO. If you want to Spider Man 2 should have been called Doctor Octopus 1. Where the prior sequel's villain overshadowed the supposed protagonist's weak story arc, in Spider Man 3 the story is all about Parker -- as it should be, IMO. If you want to see deep and fleshed-out villains, this is not the sequel for you. If you want to see Spider Man, it's nearly as good as the first film!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
KevinN.May 9, 2007
Overall, this movie is an unsatisfying, sad mess. I mean really sad: there are multiple scenes with nearly every major character tearing up. A blubbering, baby-faced Tobey Maguire sealed the doom of this film which turned out not to be Overall, this movie is an unsatisfying, sad mess. I mean really sad: there are multiple scenes with nearly every major character tearing up. A blubbering, baby-faced Tobey Maguire sealed the doom of this film which turned out not to be escapist entertainment of any sort. Because of the spectacular arial special effects, the darkness of the film feels stilted. There are character and plot continuity problems which distract, also. I didn't connect with the characters: none were particularly sympathetic. What made Venom a spider versus some other type of villian is puzzling. Why Sandman grows to a 200-300 feet size is also unexplained. It also felt long--it was at least one hour before Spiderman even started to turn into the evil, black version. Tobey Maquire as a cocky, bad boy is so unbelievable, it's laughable.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
ShaunL.May 9, 2007
The writing was so horrible it made me want to cry.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
MattH.May 9, 2007
WOW! You can really tell sam doesnt like venom!. lazy story, did he and the writers forget that john jameson is an astronaut? rushed gwen stacey in and out, and its almost like a love story between mr rami and the sandman!?. big action WOW! You can really tell sam doesnt like venom!. lazy story, did he and the writers forget that john jameson is an astronaut? rushed gwen stacey in and out, and its almost like a love story between mr rami and the sandman!?. big action sequences spoiled by nonsensical plot twists! anyone care to answer why the hobgoblin wasnt good enough for harry osborne in this film? but on the upper hand my girlfriend who doesnt follow comics or tv shows loved it! so a 3 it gets.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
StanleyF.May 9, 2007
While this is a moderately enjoyable movie, and we get to see the character grow and learn, it suffers from the beginnings of "sequel rot". Once again the writers seem to have decided more is better and included three villains. Sandman, at While this is a moderately enjoyable movie, and we get to see the character grow and learn, it suffers from the beginnings of "sequel rot". Once again the writers seem to have decided more is better and included three villains. Sandman, at least, should have been saved for his own movie, not wasted as a secondary. And the character development sequences also seemed to drag - maybe shortening the movie would have made it better.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
BrianK.May 9, 2007
Awful! Terrible sequel, just plain bad The acting was terrible, the writing so bad it was laughable, similar to Batman and Robin in terms of franchise ruining stupidity. [***SPOILER ALERT***] Topher Grace as VENOM??? are you kidding me??? Awful! Terrible sequel, just plain bad The acting was terrible, the writing so bad it was laughable, similar to Batman and Robin in terms of franchise ruining stupidity. [***SPOILER ALERT***] Topher Grace as VENOM??? are you kidding me??? The Baddest, most vile and coolest Spidey villain played by that wimp from that 70's show!? Venom is hardcore, he was portrayed as a one dimensional, wimp in this movie. The ending too was just plain stupid, and sappy. Please Mr. Raimi don't go the way of Lucas and ruin your brilliant Superhero franchise! I implore you, but you may have with this stinker!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
DaveK.May 9, 2007
Well this is definitely the worst of the 3. The movie seemed to drag on and on and on, about half hour too long. And 3/4 of the scenes had Peter parker crying....too much romance, not enough action, and just awful. thank god its over.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
JohnA.Jun 10, 2007
This movie was completely ruined by the half hour or so in the middle where spider-man is taken over by the black suit.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
ClaudineD.Jun 10, 2007
I have never understood the appeal that the spiderman movies have with critics. Although the action is flashy and true to the comic book genre, I have always maintained the Tobey MacGuire and Kirsten Dunst are grossly miscast in both roles I have never understood the appeal that the spiderman movies have with critics. Although the action is flashy and true to the comic book genre, I have always maintained the Tobey MacGuire and Kirsten Dunst are grossly miscast in both roles and offer little depth to their characters. It is really the villains and side characters that make this film watchable.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
KristofJ.Jun 12, 2007
I'm an action junkie, and this movie was made for moviegoers like me! I was looking forward to Venom to hit the silver screen, and was not disappointed. But I was surprised that my favorite character was actually Sandman. The effects on I'm an action junkie, and this movie was made for moviegoers like me! I was looking forward to Venom to hit the silver screen, and was not disappointed. But I was surprised that my favorite character was actually Sandman. The effects on him were amazing! Oscar-worthy. Definitely worth my $10 bucks. I'm getting this on dvd for sure!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
DylanD.Jun 12, 2007
Although I'm an action junkie, this movie was still not amazing as far as dialogue and story goes. Loved the villains. Venom is what got my rating up.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
AlexG.Jun 10, 2007
Although the action sequences were exciting, the story was terrible and did not live up to the first to movies. Also, the whole "walking down the street looking cool" scene in the middle of the movie was stupid, and too long. Toby Maguire Although the action sequences were exciting, the story was terrible and did not live up to the first to movies. Also, the whole "walking down the street looking cool" scene in the middle of the movie was stupid, and too long. Toby Maguire did not fit for that scene, and Kirsten Dunst was very bad. Don't bother watching this movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
ScottM.Jun 2, 2007
Totally more interesting, action-packed and dazzling than the first two, but as a drama is where it doesn't work greatly. Spider-Man 3 may have a mild issue with an identity crisis where it tries to be scary and/or funny, but it's Totally more interesting, action-packed and dazzling than the first two, but as a drama is where it doesn't work greatly. Spider-Man 3 may have a mild issue with an identity crisis where it tries to be scary and/or funny, but it's a blockbuster worth catching!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
J.W.S.Jun 28, 2007
What a horrible excuse for a movie. If it wasn't for the action scenes I would have rated it a "0". Maguire looked like a complete arse in his supposed "Joe Cool" scenes. I felt horrible even watching this crap. Kirsten Dunst is a What a horrible excuse for a movie. If it wasn't for the action scenes I would have rated it a "0". Maguire looked like a complete arse in his supposed "Joe Cool" scenes. I felt horrible even watching this crap. Kirsten Dunst is a terrible actress in this film. Crap, crap, crap...just all around crap. Don't waste your time seeing this gigantic turd sandwich.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
AlecT.Jun 30, 2007
I really want to like the Spider-Man movies, as the comic was a favourite, but the Spider-Man in the movie is just so damn whiny! Grow a spine dammit! And of course, Spider-Man 3 was just atrocious. Too many characters, a truly bizarre I really want to like the Spider-Man movies, as the comic was a favourite, but the Spider-Man in the movie is just so damn whiny! Grow a spine dammit! And of course, Spider-Man 3 was just atrocious. Too many characters, a truly bizarre "dance" scene, spectacularly bad dialogue...the list goes on. If you haven't seen this movie, save yourself the grief and watch Transformers twice.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
GrantD.Jun 3, 2007
It's a great movie. I give it a 10 because it teaches forgiveness and it has Venom in it!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
KrisS.Jun 7, 2007
Good special effects is the highlight of the movie. Peter Parker's venom stage was utterly idiotic and ruined the movie for me.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
GrayceC.Jun 9, 2007
FUN!!! That's what this movie is. There are funny moments, touching moments, and lots and lots of action. It's a total blast. I loved it!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
R.SJul 21, 2007
Why is it so hard to make a good sequel?? Especially, since the first two are really good? Why do directors and producers have against their fans? Did they let 5 year olds write and edit the script? The plot had nothing going for it, and how Why is it so hard to make a good sequel?? Especially, since the first two are really good? Why do directors and producers have against their fans? Did they let 5 year olds write and edit the script? The plot had nothing going for it, and how all of the sudden did Spider-man's best friend get super powers? What happened to Kirsten Dunst's acting skills? Was she on crack the entire time they shot the movie? It seems that the lull of the lucre got to these producers and writers. All they needed was some garbage with Spider-Man 3 on the front and they knew they'd have their millions-millions of disappointed fans too. What a sham!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
SophieJul 31, 2007
I loved the first two movies. Spider-Man could get a 9/10 out of 10 easily, and I'm willing to give Spider-Man 2 a 10. This movie was decent enough for one viewing.. but very very disappointing. It is on par with Fantastic Four 2, and I loved the first two movies. Spider-Man could get a 9/10 out of 10 easily, and I'm willing to give Spider-Man 2 a 10. This movie was decent enough for one viewing.. but very very disappointing. It is on par with Fantastic Four 2, and Spider-Man movies are normally so much more than that.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
TheManSep 7, 2007
If you took a big suck on a fat mans ass you wouldn't even come close to the how horrible the movie really is. WOW. My keyboard can't put into letters the depth of suckness that is required to describe this move.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
AnonymousMCJan 12, 2008
Spider-man 3 was the #1 movie i wanted to see of 2007. I saw it on 6 May. I have to say it is not as good as the first two. This movie dragged a lot, which reminded my of the old days of star wars ep. 2 and pearl harbor. the acting kinda wentSpider-man 3 was the #1 movie i wanted to see of 2007. I saw it on 6 May. I have to say it is not as good as the first two. This movie dragged a lot, which reminded my of the old days of star wars ep. 2 and pearl harbor. the acting kinda went down a bit. I have no idea why people are going off for the scene where Peter is dancing in the street. that was funny. Overall, this movie is not a ripoff. It's just not the best of the spidey trilogy. I give it an 8/10… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
AshleyM.Mar 30, 2008
This movie was artistically amazing and had a lot of great aspects!!!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
SteveOMay 7, 2008
Spider-Man was a classic and even Spider-Man 2 was good enough to keep me entertained... Spider-Man 3, however, is a bunch of BS. Everything seemed to collapse. What happened to the story and acting? This is a bunch of nonsense! Unreal and stupid.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
SamGMay 8, 2008
Abysmal.Overly-long, terrible acting all-round (with the possible exception of Hayden-Church), Parker dancing, giving kirsten dunst TWO songs, awful dialogue, messy fight-scenes and worst of all, a shot of spiderman posing in front of the Abysmal.Overly-long, terrible acting all-round (with the possible exception of Hayden-Church), Parker dancing, giving kirsten dunst TWO songs, awful dialogue, messy fight-scenes and worst of all, a shot of spiderman posing in front of the American flag. Don't get me wrong I've got nothing against America or patriotism, but that made me feel nauseous. Utterly rubbish.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
KeithJNov 30, 2007
Loaded with illogical and unlikely events, it feels like an excuse for special effects and to tie loose ends. That said, the special effects are good. So if you want to partly disengage your brain, this movie is satisfactory.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
BryanM.Nov 5, 2007
what is so wrong with this? it is a great action movie and yes I know they gayest thing about it is it has way to much love in it with mary jan. but that black spider man was so cool. the only bad part is I did not get to see the ending i what is so wrong with this? it is a great action movie and yes I know they gayest thing about it is it has way to much love in it with mary jan. but that black spider man was so cool. the only bad part is I did not get to see the ending i saw it on a bus trip. o and harry is a bad villen. he got his butt wopped to easy.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
SteveC.Nov 7, 2007
There is a lot wrong with this movie, but in the end it's still entertaining.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
CraigGNov 9, 2007
This movie was absolutely awful, the comedy in the middle just completely disjointed the film, and it was soooo long. Utter dross.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
BrianD.Oct 24, 2007
They have officially killed my favorite childhood superhero.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
GiovanaC.May 11, 2007
It is a great movie with a lot of action and creates a lot of different emotions by it's development. The perfect closing for the sequel and is going to be on the top 3 of the blockbusters of this summer. A good movie if you watch it It is a great movie with a lot of action and creates a lot of different emotions by it's development. The perfect closing for the sequel and is going to be on the top 3 of the blockbusters of this summer. A good movie if you watch it with a positive attitude.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
MarkC.May 11, 2007
Great movie , but they just dont make comic movies like they used to. No real artistic creativity. Tim Burton should create more of them. He almost did Superman returns and it was gonna be great, but he then turned it down for some reason.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
FrankF.May 10, 2007
How difficult is it to find a cast that has talent? Quite difficult apparently. My favorite parts were when I had trouble distinguishing between Toby Maguire's happy face and his angry face. And I think I have a cardboard box in my How difficult is it to find a cast that has talent? Quite difficult apparently. My favorite parts were when I had trouble distinguishing between Toby Maguire's happy face and his angry face. And I think I have a cardboard box in my basement that has more talent than Kirsten Dunst could ever muster. Two thirds of the way through I almost got up and walked out, but I decided to give it the benefit of the doubt, thinking it might get better yet. I could not have been more wrong. It just dragged on into oblivion. I was horribly disappointed.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
MikeW.May 12, 2007
Special effects were fine, as expected. But that no longer is a big deal in action cinema as all big budget pictures are expected to look spectacular. So we must judge the film on more traditional grounds, such as acting, screenplay, etc., Special effects were fine, as expected. But that no longer is a big deal in action cinema as all big budget pictures are expected to look spectacular. So we must judge the film on more traditional grounds, such as acting, screenplay, etc., and on these fronts, the film is very uneven. I'm not kidding when I say that the screenplay seems to have been written by Oprah, given the lengthy and numerous outpourings of emotions by the characters, usually done spontaneously and melodramatically such that none of it is really believable. Indeed, at many points I cringed at the sob-fests, and even laughed out loud at others. Really, it's that bad. I don't even want to see Toby Maguire try to "cry" again. Wait for the "bridge scene"; it's camp at its finest. So the acting is out the window. Same can be said for much of the writing, which is undeveloped, used chiefly to keep the plot moving forward, and reveals litle about the deeper thoughts of the characters. This is all quite surprising given the amount of time that the characters actually spend talking. At times they just wouldn't seem to shut up, just babbling on mawkishly about their guilt or fears or the depths of their love, none of which seems seems to much matter to the audience. We hear their pain, but we don't care. We simply don't know the characters well enough. There are too many bad guys, the comedic moments are awkwardly drawn out, Mary-Jane is a self-absorbed whiner who becomes more shrill will every seen, pushing us from feeling indifference to her character to active contempt. The only truly enjoyable performance was by Topher Grace, who genuinely seemed to enjoy his character, and brought great zeal to the role. I look forward to seeing him in future films. As for the rest of the Spider-Man crew, well, I won't be going out of my way to pay them any serious attention.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
ChandlerW.May 12, 2007
This movie is good for one thing: Uncontrollable laughter at the bizzare and perpetual non-sequiturs and atrocious acting and script-writng. But as far this movie being a coherent, decent, and mildly convincing film in its intended fashion, This movie is good for one thing: Uncontrollable laughter at the bizzare and perpetual non-sequiturs and atrocious acting and script-writng. But as far this movie being a coherent, decent, and mildly convincing film in its intended fashion, it get a 0. No, less than 0. The quality of this film-making is so poor that it will have you wondering if you are dreaming, or if Sam Raimi decided that the American Movie-watching public was too inattentive and sedate to notice the difference between a good movie and a poorly edited, acted, and written montage of complete sh...… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
RayT.May 12, 2007
Ruined the comics, spent to omuch time cramming in Christian morals and principles. Spider Man 2 was able to have its morals and still be an overall achievement.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
RirenMay 12, 2007
The weakest of the three existing Spider-Man films, it's still quite entertaining. Spider-Man 3 wades into cartoony logic, bordering on the style of Asian comedy/action flicks from time to time. It's opening is its weakest point, The weakest of the three existing Spider-Man films, it's still quite entertaining. Spider-Man 3 wades into cartoony logic, bordering on the style of Asian comedy/action flicks from time to time. It's opening is its weakest point, with the characters acting irrationally or being downright stupid, and the plot setups being completely contrived (the evil black costume literally falls from space, and is never given an origin or motive - it's just a mean little puddle of slime). Once action sequences are great, the humor is refreshing, and computer graphics are beautiful (really - Sandman's first empowered appearance is one of the most beautiful computer effects in the history of film), but the drama is all hammy and silly. Also, with three villains, two love interests and a darkening hero on its hands, the movie has too much material to pace itself properly, leading to a disappointing climax. Fans of the comics should be warned that the beloved Venom isn't done justice, not by the script, not by the terrible actor they cast, and not by whatever genius decided Eddie Brock should sprout pointy teeth when unmasked, and that he should unmask every two minutes. Definitely see this in the theatre, though; it's the best way to appreciate the effects, and to lose yourself in its murky atmosphere.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
RichS.May 12, 2007
I liked it. It was fast paced, but easy to keep up with. Character development was pretty good but could have been much better with some of the new characters to get people who don't already know them up to speed. It's definitely I liked it. It was fast paced, but easy to keep up with. Character development was pretty good but could have been much better with some of the new characters to get people who don't already know them up to speed. It's definitely different than the first two movies in terms of style but still very good.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
LouisH.May 13, 2007
I couldn't help but notice that the countless reviews for this movie had a lot of variety. My vote may not make much of a splash in the review puddle, but I though this movie was FANTASTIC!!!. My favorite part is when he is king of the I couldn't help but notice that the countless reviews for this movie had a lot of variety. My vote may not make much of a splash in the review puddle, but I though this movie was FANTASTIC!!!. My favorite part is when he is king of the streets. I laughed so hard that I cried. You'll probably love that scene too. Watch this movie!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
BobL.May 13, 2007
Best Spiderman movie ever, was a bit distracting with multiple storylines but it did break opening day and week records so its not that bad i'm sure if a 4th one were to come itd be even better.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
SpideyThreeMay 13, 2007
Awful in every way. Please, I beg you not to waste your money!The villian apologizes at the end. 'Nuff said.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
Kathy,KarlandBearL.May 13, 2007
A very satisfying development of the Spider Man character overall, despite the jaded critiques of the ADD critics. Sandman's turmoil worked as a reflection of Spidernan's angst, and brought into light the factor of fate and how A very satisfying development of the Spider Man character overall, despite the jaded critiques of the ADD critics. Sandman's turmoil worked as a reflection of Spidernan's angst, and brought into light the factor of fate and how much one has control over ones destiny. I really enjoyed this movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
SubM.May 13, 2007
A great Movie with non stop action, excitement and thrills the 3 villans tied into the story and theme of revenge, betrayl and the dark side of someones character very well a huge impovement over the second film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
WilliamJ.May 14, 2007
Like the last two, with more jokes and corny parts. Various things are wrong with it and a lot is good but unfortunately it cannot live up to the last two.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
MaikB.May 15, 2007
What a wasted trip to the pictures. Tryed to keep awake all the way through! Dont waste your money on it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
DiegoV.May 16, 2007
Yuck! This one sucks. I really hate it, its the wrost of the series so far. I love the first 2 but this one is as bas as it takes. So much boring moments and bad writing that I gave up. I really hate almost everything did in this pile of Yuck! This one sucks. I really hate it, its the wrost of the series so far. I love the first 2 but this one is as bas as it takes. So much boring moments and bad writing that I gave up. I really hate almost everything did in this pile of crap. Spider Man Emo sucks bad!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
PaulF.May 16, 2007
Spider Man 3 despite what some critics have said is a good film. Sure it had its problems, mainly the length of the film and a bit too many subplots. I felt Spider Man 2 was the best of the three in terms of overall composition. It was like Spider Man 3 despite what some critics have said is a good film. Sure it had its problems, mainly the length of the film and a bit too many subplots. I felt Spider Man 2 was the best of the three in terms of overall composition. It was like a really good piece of rockin candy keeping you hummin till its last scrumptious crunch. Spidy 3 however was more the soul of the series. I think this is most important in an era of movies which overloads us with vanilla. You really got a sense of Peter's sensitivities, his hurts, loves, and the dark parts of his soul, mainly his quest for revenge that only only manifest against his uncles killer but also a perceived unrequited love. I'm happy they have made this film and do not think it was a mistake, nor a sell out riding on the coattails of the previous two. I believe in the years to come this film will be see as the most artistic of the 3 and become somewhat of a cult classic.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
KenG.May 17, 2007
This seemed like filmmakers were going down a "to do" check-list, rather than engaging in coherent story-telling. Plus, I've never liked Maguire in the role.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
PrestonJ.May 17, 2007
While production values were great and the visual effects were at peak performance (especially with the sand man), the rest of the films aspects crumbled. The action shots were done too tightly leaving the fights undecernable as apposed to While production values were great and the visual effects were at peak performance (especially with the sand man), the rest of the films aspects crumbled. The action shots were done too tightly leaving the fights undecernable as apposed to the many wide shots used in previous films so you could actually whatch the action happening. The script was waaaaaay too cheesy (even for a Spider-man film). The villians were used as cheap excuses to add action as opposed to further plot and there were far too many of them. As a result none were developed into their full potential as an actual nemisis (as Vemon was in the comics and the animated series as well as the Green Goblin). By trying to sell to the family audience these charcters end up being side thoughts as opposed to the harrowing evil they were originally. Then there are the overlylong silly sequences (such as a elaborate swing dance section in which it feels as though Mr. Raimi was auditioning for Chicago 2 rather than making a real movie) as well as Bruce Campells return as comedic relief. All in all the movie had some decent parts but Tobey McGuire is not a virsital enough actor, the script was an exercise in silliness, the directing was sloppy and undecernable at times, and nothing was developed enough to make you care about what was happening to the characters.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
HollywoodDeBoerMay 20, 2007
Half a billion dollars when into this movie, and I spent half of it covering my eyes beause i felt personally embarrased for toby and every actor that unforunetly starred in this peice of garbage. I understand that it is hard to make a movie Half a billion dollars when into this movie, and I spent half of it covering my eyes beause i felt personally embarrased for toby and every actor that unforunetly starred in this peice of garbage. I understand that it is hard to make a movie when you have fan-boys breathing down your neck, but boy this isn't even close. The black suit was supose to make spiderman stronger and faster and meaner, it just made him emo and a prick, and hearing topher's grace come out of venom in full suit left a lot to be desired. Next time, maybe explain what the suit does to spiderman pyhsically not just mentally. 500 million dollars down the tubes. Heck, that money could have been more well spent hiring some original writers.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
MattR.May 21, 2007
Terrible. It felt like the producers decided to take the "best" bits, and try to write a story around them. Incredibly, this movie manages to both suck and blow!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
S.J.May 22, 2007
This is one of those movies I will have to see again before I give full judgement. The certainly good elements were the special effects, the best of the three and some of the best I've ever seen. I was especially blown away with the This is one of those movies I will have to see again before I give full judgement. The certainly good elements were the special effects, the best of the three and some of the best I've ever seen. I was especially blown away with the crane scene. There were parts in which it felt scattered, but the humor I thought was taken up a notch and it felt more like a comic book story with some class. Black and white strong messages, inspiring heroics, exciting action, and engaging drama. My main specific complaints would be, as aforementioned, it was scattered at times. As well, one of the villains needed to be a little stronger, the last fight should have been longer and more climactic, and the ending should have a little bit more story wrapping...such as a wedding or at least his proposal finally happening. Also, venom should have been seen as more evil in the end. I thought the story with Harry was good...but him turning evil, then good, then evil again, seemed a little out of place. But the ending was good Overall, I would say this had the makings of being a good super-hero story ending...and further films may mess it up. However, it may give a chance to make an even better ending.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
DesireeC.May 22, 2007
The second spiderman movie was the best out of the three. There was too many characters that were introduced and not enough time, The effects were outstanding the acting however was not.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
Page:
More From This Movie

59 Critic Reviews

6.5 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 81 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
2 77 Project Hail Mary
3 75 Send Help
4 73 Hoppers
5 71 The Sheep Detectives
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL