Columbia Pictures | Release Date: May 4, 2007
6.5
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 2191 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
1,219
Mixed:
538
Negative:
434
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
3
DanMay 23, 2007
I plain hated this movie. Half the time I was just laughing at how stupid it was. Tobey being a "bad" guy had me nearly in tears as it ruined my whole image of Spiderman. It also tried to do way too much. Too many villains and sappy moments. I plain hated this movie. Half the time I was just laughing at how stupid it was. Tobey being a "bad" guy had me nearly in tears as it ruined my whole image of Spiderman. It also tried to do way too much. Too many villains and sappy moments. Why they didn't make a movie with just Venom is beyond me. He shouldn't have been in the movie at all the way they did it. So yea: this is a bad movie. Don't waste your money. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
BenjiD.May 24, 2007
This movie was comically bad. Literally every line of dialogue were corny, stilted, or poorly delivered. The movie becomes especially stupid during the middle parts with emo-spiderman. The characters were poorly developed and cliched, This movie was comically bad. Literally every line of dialogue were corny, stilted, or poorly delivered. The movie becomes especially stupid during the middle parts with emo-spiderman. The characters were poorly developed and cliched, especially Sandman. However, the unintentional comedy provided by the horrible script and acting is often laugh out loud funny. The one decent aspect of this movie is the special effects, and, considering this was the most expansive movie ever produced, they had better be. To be honest, I'm not sure how anyone could like this movie. If you must watch it, do so with the sound turned off. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
HeleneC.May 25, 2007
This movie was filmed in ADD - attention deficit disorder. Events don't follow each other logically. Monsters are mis-matched. This film is a blatant attempt by the studio to earn more revenue while offering eager movie goers nothing in return.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
stupidmanMay 27, 2007
Loved the first one, LOVED the second one, shocked by the third. Boring and pointless. I was expecting a mamouth display from venom. but failed to deliver
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
AdrianWillsMay 3, 2007
Unfortunately, something just went completely wrong with this movie - despite the first two being really well made. There's not nearly enough action for the movie it is (or could've been) and most of it is interrupted by dreary and Unfortunately, something just went completely wrong with this movie - despite the first two being really well made. There's not nearly enough action for the movie it is (or could've been) and most of it is interrupted by dreary and tiresome sappy sequences between characters. And the entire sequence before, after and including the jazz bar scene is both too long and possibly one of the most unnecessary and cheesy pieces of cinema I've seen in a few years. I was [emphasis on the word was] a huge fan of this series, I'm not a comic book freak and I just thought this movie completely missed the plot. And all respect for Stan Lee in his original writing, but what his he doing with a pointless speaking role, give the cameo but make it interesting and enjoyable. Any action sequences and Spiderman-isms there are in this movie is what's made it a 2/10 rather than less. Disappointing. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
MartinL.May 4, 2007
M. Lee--What are you talking about? Spiderman 2 was infinitely better than 1. And why do you think people even care about the first 2 films? It is simply because of the character development, not the boring CGI crap/action that can be seen M. Lee--What are you talking about? Spiderman 2 was infinitely better than 1. And why do you think people even care about the first 2 films? It is simply because of the character development, not the boring CGI crap/action that can be seen in Power Rangers. Please, you sound like an idiot. This film was awful and unoriginal. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
A.StuartMay 4, 2007
This just wasn't good. It seemed like Raimi took numerous short films centered around Spiderman and decided to mash them together. Because he tried to squeeze everything into one movie, Raimi wasn't able to focus enough on a This just wasn't good. It seemed like Raimi took numerous short films centered around Spiderman and decided to mash them together. Because he tried to squeeze everything into one movie, Raimi wasn't able to focus enough on a coherent story or any character development. There wasn't even enough room for the good old web slinging through the streets of New York. For such a long movie, nothing was accomplished. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
CaptainmarvelMay 4, 2007
Film students all over earth, go see this film to learn how to mess up an otherwise good film, ten minutes before it all ends. sam raimi, who seems to have absoulte control of everything somehow looses focus towards the end, making all theFilm students all over earth, go see this film to learn how to mess up an otherwise good film, ten minutes before it all ends. sam raimi, who seems to have absoulte control of everything somehow looses focus towards the end, making all the vilians kind of apologise to spidey and spidey forgiving and crying while doing so...who is going to apologise to us? for believing this movie and paying the ticket price? how are we suppose to leave the theater wanting to be a superhero and humming the tune when at the end, they make spidey seem like a girly man? they didnt even have a hardcore spidey tune when the credits started to roll at the end...oh what a crime this is!...it started so well...but ended in a manner even a superhero cant save. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
MattD.May 4, 2007
Long, dull, boring, full of cliches. CGI was great, but not near worth it. Do NOT recommend.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
AndyS.May 4, 2007
I wanted it to be good. I almost willed it to be good. Alas, it was not good and, sadly, It wasn't even mediocre. The pacing was off, the dialog was off, the humor was off, and even the CGI just didn't seem that interesting. Even I wanted it to be good. I almost willed it to be good. Alas, it was not good and, sadly, It wasn't even mediocre. The pacing was off, the dialog was off, the humor was off, and even the CGI just didn't seem that interesting. Even the best CGI can't save a bad script. Slight of hand is generally more appreciated than a slap in the face; I had red cheeks by the time the credits rolled. Am I naive to hope for a better Spider-man than part 2? Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
BenS.May 4, 2007
A train wreck of a film. The super-generic misunderstanding that leads to a rift between Peter and MJ seems like something out of the worst episode of the worst soap opera ever. The overdone action scenes made up less than 10% of the film, A train wreck of a film. The super-generic misunderstanding that leads to a rift between Peter and MJ seems like something out of the worst episode of the worst soap opera ever. The overdone action scenes made up less than 10% of the film, and were terribly paced. The only thing that held me from walking out was the in-theater response. I normally burn with rage when people even whisper in a theater, but my theater seemed like one of the better episodes of Mystery Science Theater 3000. I laughed harder at this movie than I do for most comedies. Dialog wise, this movie should go down in history next to Plan Nine From Outer Space. I wouldn't recommend this movie to my worst enemy. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
NormaS.May 4, 2007
Boring, Boring, Boring. I thought it would never end. The story was weak, the filming was awful and the special effects were amateur. In addition to this I had to sit there for over 2 hours. The only thing that saved this movie is that it Boring, Boring, Boring. I thought it would never end. The story was weak, the filming was awful and the special effects were amateur. In addition to this I had to sit there for over 2 hours. The only thing that saved this movie is that it appealed to my 10 year old son, though he despised the kissing scenes. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
BrianA.May 4, 2007
A real mess of a film, at least compared to the first two movies. I think things started going downhill towards the tail end of the second movie, and here, we see the Spider-Man franchise nose dive. The story is clunky and boring (episodes A real mess of a film, at least compared to the first two movies. I think things started going downhill towards the tail end of the second movie, and here, we see the Spider-Man franchise nose dive. The story is clunky and boring (episodes of "Days of Their Lives" have more interesting story arcs), and even the action sequences aren't that amazing. And as Parker turns into the black Spider-Man, the movie almost turns into some sort of strange slapstick. Really should be a disappointment to anyone - and a huge disappointment to franchise fans. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
AtomK.May 5, 2007
God this movie sucked, I was checking my watch 1/3 the way through, and at the 3/4 mark I'm wondering if there is going to be any plot showing up. The first fight scene is some really great adrenalin filled action. The movie looks good God this movie sucked, I was checking my watch 1/3 the way through, and at the 3/4 mark I'm wondering if there is going to be any plot showing up. The first fight scene is some really great adrenalin filled action. The movie looks good and that's about it. I don't want an EMO spidy. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
JosephG.May 5, 2007
My wife and I stared at each other in disbelief during Peter's dance scene. The film's tone is completely inconsistent. Special effects are underwhelming. Spidey's costume still looks too glossy and doesn't look like My wife and I stared at each other in disbelief during Peter's dance scene. The film's tone is completely inconsistent. Special effects are underwhelming. Spidey's costume still looks too glossy and doesn't look like Tobey M.'s figure. Scenes seem to repeat themselves. Other scenes feel like outtakes from SM2. The first time Venom spoke, I laughed. He's supposed to have a fearsome, rough, grumbly voice, not sound just like Eric Forman. The film is so long, but it feels as if nothing happens. What a waste! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
MelvinG.May 5, 2007
That was awful. Very poor acting, story and editing. This franchise is done... "Spiderman Begins" anyone?
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
StevenS.May 5, 2007
Really bad. All the themes and ideas are fine, but the execution lacks any sense of emotional reality. The action sequences are predictable in their pacing by the end and the story itself is a flimsy skeleton to hang them on. I loved Really bad. All the themes and ideas are fine, but the execution lacks any sense of emotional reality. The action sequences are predictable in their pacing by the end and the story itself is a flimsy skeleton to hang them on. I loved Spiderman 2, so to me, they really screwed this one up. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
CzarMay 6, 2007
Complete crap, the story was beyond stupid, the fight sequences were so lame. I know its a comic and everything but make the things that are happening at least slightly believable or in line with the laws of physics. Way too much animation Complete crap, the story was beyond stupid, the fight sequences were so lame. I know its a comic and everything but make the things that are happening at least slightly believable or in line with the laws of physics. Way too much animation and it was way too obvious. 45 minutes into the movie I was looking at my watch waiting to get out. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
KrisMay 6, 2007
Topher Grace as "Venom" is like Jack Black as "The Crow", totally miscast! Guess I'll have to wait for the next "Batman" in order to se a great hero film. So long, Spidey, it was good while it lasted.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
BrendanO.May 6, 2007
Very disappointing. Cheesy dialogue, ridiculous musical scenes. You could tell the actors didn't buy into the script. People in the audience were actually laughing out loud during serious emotional scenes. I guess it wasn't a Very disappointing. Cheesy dialogue, ridiculous musical scenes. You could tell the actors didn't buy into the script. People in the audience were actually laughing out loud during serious emotional scenes. I guess it wasn't a horrible film, just really really bad, and considering that it followed two brilliant predecessors with Spiderman 1 and 2, that made it all the more disappointing. I did actually like Topher Grace as Venom and Bruce Campbell's short scene was very funny. I really hope they don't make a fourth. Batman & Robin anyone? Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
KyleB.May 8, 2007
Most often dull. They waited to long to gte to Venom, a character who could fill an entire movie on his own
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
CraigASSep 17, 2007
I am so glad I didn't pay money to see this revisionist, sloppy dreck.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
JesseS.Feb 18, 2008
Cramming over twenty years of comic history into a single hour of a movie won't help with storyline or plot, but it'll definitely help sales. One of the main problems of the movie is that the storyline rushes and moves too fast. Cramming over twenty years of comic history into a single hour of a movie won't help with storyline or plot, but it'll definitely help sales. One of the main problems of the movie is that the storyline rushes and moves too fast. Scenes skip around to the point where you have to be paying close attention to what's going on, or you'll miss important plot points. Having said that, I'll talk about individual processes. Topher Grace's performance of Venom is less-than-spectacular. Venom is a character who's the pure essence of evil. He originally had a distorted, screech-like voice, but now it's only slightly deepened by Grace's. The abundance of bad lines that Grace has don't help his performance, either. "I like being bad. It makes me happy." That was one of the lines that made the movie feel like a big, unimportant joke. I did like the special effects of the Sandman and Thomas Hayden Church's performance. The parts of Venom could've been cut out to save for another movie and this would've been great. Weak subplots and overly-fast pacing put the third film as bad as Fantastic 4 : Rise of the Silver Surfer. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
JPJun 8, 2008
Words cannot adequately describe how bad this movie is. Flat acting performances, cringe-inducing and often pointless dialogue, ridiculous action scenes, an plot that's both overstuffed and riddled with holes, and don't get me Words cannot adequately describe how bad this movie is. Flat acting performances, cringe-inducing and often pointless dialogue, ridiculous action scenes, an plot that's both overstuffed and riddled with holes, and don't get me started on the Spiderman 'dance' scenes. I'm also still trying to figure out who was behind a couple of the casting decisions (Topher Grace as Eddie Brock? Really guys?) and the handling of the Peter Parker/MJ 'relationship' (if that's what you can call what went on in this movie). Avoid at all costs. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
dudeNov 20, 2007
WHY DOES HE TURN EMO IN THE MIDDLE OF THE MOVIE? He even does the hair thing! And that stupid jazz dance scene, what the fuck was that?? The graphics were great, the dialogue, I'm sorry, just can't be taken seriously. Why was he WHY DOES HE TURN EMO IN THE MIDDLE OF THE MOVIE? He even does the hair thing! And that stupid jazz dance scene, what the fuck was that?? The graphics were great, the dialogue, I'm sorry, just can't be taken seriously. Why was he dancing in the streets and giving the thumbs up like a jackass? Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
BuckNov 24, 2007
As a big Sam Rami fan I cant believe what a big pile of manure Spiderman 3 is.I can understand going away from the books on the origin fo the symbiont suit, explaining the secret wars to people theat don't read comic books would beAs a big Sam Rami fan I cant believe what a big pile of manure Spiderman 3 is.I can understand going away from the books on the origin fo the symbiont suit, explaining the secret wars to people theat don't read comic books would be pretty tough.I could even understand putting the sandman in the film.I might even have been ae to accept harry becoming goblin Jr. but when he canged the single greatest spiderman villain from a middle aged reporter to a whiney little Emo kid Venom also always referred to itself as us and we thats where he really lost me. In fact the only redeeming thing in the movie is Bruce Campbell playing the French Maitre'De.Sam couldn't have made this movie any worse if he tried which makes me believe that idiotic studio executives had more to do with making this huge pile of elephant dung than Sam Rami did. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
UncleDougBigelowNov 26, 2007
Sandman killed this movie. The only reason it doesn't get a zero is because Parker smacked M.J.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
JeffG.Dec 7, 2007
Whining, complaining, and soap opera cliches fill up a movie with two good fight scenes. Compared to the comics, my favorite character, Venom, is castrated. Something happens with some guy that turns into sand, and the Green Goblin boresWhining, complaining, and soap opera cliches fill up a movie with two good fight scenes. Compared to the comics, my favorite character, Venom, is castrated. Something happens with some guy that turns into sand, and the Green Goblin bores everyone to death. All that in over two hours. I got this movie for free, and I regret it dearly. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
JesseRakusinDec 8, 2007
sucks.. what a waste of 300 million dollars.. Sam Rami went ego insane. A movie full of cliche's but in no way a spiderman movie. Horrible. The action scene at the begining with parker and goblin2 was cool besided that it'ssucks.. what a waste of 300 million dollars.. Sam Rami went ego insane. A movie full of cliche's but in no way a spiderman movie. Horrible. The action scene at the begining with parker and goblin2 was cool besided that it's horrible. i mean eric from the 70's show is a fine actor but he's not f'n Venom. Venom is supposed to be a bad ass. This was almost as bad as giving superman a kid. Complete crap worse than I expected and I was was expecting bad. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
JonM.May 29, 2007
I really liked the first Spider-Man. The sequel I liked even more. Characters were more fleshed out, grew more, and developed more so that by the time the loose ends from the first film ended, there were entirely new threads to deal with for I really liked the first Spider-Man. The sequel I liked even more. Characters were more fleshed out, grew more, and developed more so that by the time the loose ends from the first film ended, there were entirely new threads to deal with for the third movie. Needless to say, I had high expectations. I was sorely disappointed. The dialogue was awful. Don't give me comic book cheesy. The first two movies had plenty of comic book cheese that I enjoyed as much as the next person. This movie was just poorly written, poorly thought out. There was no chemistry between Tobey Maguire and Kirsten Dunst. To top it all off, the poorly written lines were given even worse delivery by the actors. The Sand Man effects were good, the Venom effects not so much. A complete miscast in Topher Grace for Eddie Brock/Venom. The only two scenes worth anything were: the Bruce Campbell cameo scene. While expected, it was highly amusing, and the very seventies Saturday Night Fever scene where the new "dark" Peter Parker tries to be cool and fails abysmally. And when did "dark and not very good" equate to emo? Everything from the darker, eye covering hair to eye-liner screamed emo punk. With such high expectations and such a big let down, I can't justify giving this movie any score. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
DarylB.May 31, 2007
I enjoyed the action sequences. The rest was terrible. Absolutely and unequivocally terrible. Cheesy to the extreme. I cringed through the disco street scene and a lot of the dialogue.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
JoeSJul 22, 2008
Horrible compared to the first two, this was more of a chick flick
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
SSAug 19, 2009
The worst sequel I've ever seen to a good movie. What was Raimi on when he made this piece of crap?! Its like all the actors forgot how to act, all the writers forgot how to write! This travesty reduces the glory of Spider-Man, one of The worst sequel I've ever seen to a good movie. What was Raimi on when he made this piece of crap?! Its like all the actors forgot how to act, all the writers forgot how to write! This travesty reduces the glory of Spider-Man, one of the greatest superheroes of all time, to a streaming pile of dog droppings. When you see Tobey, fresh from his emo stupor sway dancing through the crowds midway through the picture, that should be a good indication to leave the theater, if you haven't done so already. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
AcidM.Nov 16, 2007
Wow. After seeing the villains in this one, I propose, that in "Spider-Man 4," they have Spider-Man fight a T-Rex with a laser beam, a flying shark with a tiger's head, a 90-foot tall Hitler, and the 4 Horsemen of the Apocalypse.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
KoryN.Nov 23, 2007
This movie is a joke. It made me wish that movies had commercial interruptions. I liked the part where there was some swinging around and punching and kicking and stuff up in the sky and some kid goes "Awesome!" and another kid goes "Wicked This movie is a joke. It made me wish that movies had commercial interruptions. I liked the part where there was some swinging around and punching and kicking and stuff up in the sky and some kid goes "Awesome!" and another kid goes "Wicked cool!!!" That part was totally rad! This movie made me want to stick some of those orange circus peanut candies up my nose and fire/blow them at the television screen so that they would stick to spider-man's face. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
BrandonCavnarDec 14, 2007
Has Spidey gone EMO with his new do and black ensemble? They dilligently attempted to screw this movie royally. All cliches aside, why so many characters and no development? It's dizzying with everyone crying and pissing aboutHas Spidey gone EMO with his new do and black ensemble? They dilligently attempted to screw this movie royally. All cliches aside, why so many characters and no development? It's dizzying with everyone crying and pissing about self-empowerment. This sequel should put spidey out of his sensitive misunderstood misery. I want my money back! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
ChristopherP.Dec 24, 2008
Insensible, hollow, soulless crap, even moreso if compared to the previous chapter. Nothing about it works like it should. There are plot illogicalities that will make absolutely anyone ask themselves, "Huh?" For starters, why did Parker Insensible, hollow, soulless crap, even moreso if compared to the previous chapter. Nothing about it works like it should. There are plot illogicalities that will make absolutely anyone ask themselves, "Huh?" For starters, why did Parker think it was a good idea to make out with that new girl in front of everyone, then follow up with a planned proposal to his official girlfriend? Was he oblivious that she just might be there watching the whole time? Then, when the girl shows up out of nowhere and talks about how she kissed Spider-Man, it never seems to register in him that something's not right then. So then, after it's proven that Parker's a douche, we immediately are given a sad scene with Parker crying as we learn Sandman was his uncle's killer. Uh, okay, I thought the movie wanted me to feel resentment for Parker's overt arrogance for a second there, but this sad music wants me to feel sympathetic for something else? Also, I know a romantic subplot is necessary, and I expected it completely, but most of this movie was a soap opera, one for which I wasn't rooting for the main angst figure that is Parker. Parker does stupid, insensitive things the entire film. When he's not making us hate him by hurting everyone's emotions (and, in Harry's case, detonating a grenade next to his face), he's trying to do it by being a whiny little bitch who doesn't seem to understand why any of it's happening. The soap opera factor reaches critical mass, though, when Harry tells Parker he's "the other guy" that MJ is after, right after MJ tells him in tears that it's over while he pulls out his engagement ring, also in tears. I understand some amount of drama is to be expected in this movie, but we're so relentlessly bombarded with histrionic drivel and sad piano music it's impossible not to get sick of it long before it's over. I mean, for Christ's sake, we get an -AMNESIA- plot device, one that's become a parody for TV dramas in itself. Further, one of my main reasons for going into the theater was to see Venom kick some ass. Unfortunately, while the romantic subplot was unfolding, and something which I guess is supposed to resemble comic relief in the infamous "emo-Parker" sequences, I spent the first two-thirds of the movie asking myself, "Where the Hell is Venom?" When he finally got on, we get nothing at all worth watching. Also, referring back to the grenade exploding a few inches by Harry's face, if anyone didn't notice, that same grenade that managed to cause just a burn completely obliterated Venom. Nothing else really comes together to redeem it. The dialogue is unbelievably stupid and trite, the special effects are overproduced to oblivion and silliness, and the best parts involved the news station comedy bits. Don't even get me started on the emo-Parker comic relief scene, which could not possibly have been more over-the-top inappropriate. I wasn't sure if I was supposed to be laughing, or if it was some kind of message about Parker still being a spiteful jerk. I saw no good reason to feel bad for him while he cold-heartedly caused every event of his own miserable luck. Crushingly disappointing after the ridiculously awesome previous entry. Just abysmal. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
wolffmary86Dec 8, 2011
Liked the first one a whole lot, loved the second, but this one was complete trash. I told my friends not to waste their money on this one. It got wrong what the first two got right and then some, never been this disappointed in my life.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
gkelly5579Dec 8, 2011
What a waste of time! Walked into this movie with high expectations, thought I was watching a poorly done Mad TV sketch(which is saying something for Mad TV because their sketches are normally bad) but then realized I was infact in the middleWhat a waste of time! Walked into this movie with high expectations, thought I was watching a poorly done Mad TV sketch(which is saying something for Mad TV because their sketches are normally bad) but then realized I was infact in the middle of a horrible Spider-Man movie. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
CooterPatooterMar 7, 2012
An unnecessarily overlong and depressing sequel that has Peter Parker happily embracing the dark side until minutes before the end credits roll. Having him change his mind at the last possible second and then show up in time to get his buttAn unnecessarily overlong and depressing sequel that has Peter Parker happily embracing the dark side until minutes before the end credits roll. Having him change his mind at the last possible second and then show up in time to get his butt pummeled for ten minutes straight is a terrible way to end a franchise. Crying, blubbering and egotistical trash-talking abounds. Throw in Topher Grace as a criminally uninteresting and underpowered Venom (you can't be serious!!!) and you have a recipe for total meltdown. I suggest you pretend that Spider Man 2 was the final movie in the series and avoid this quagmire completely. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
LuiszJun 3, 2014
The worst movie of Spider-Man and one of the worst from Marvel.........................................................................................
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
Sonic45XNov 26, 2014
While it's not the absolute worst movie I've ever seen, this movie is so bad that i can barely call this a super hero movie, let alone a Spider-man movie. While the action is great, the characters and story freaking blow. The characters areWhile it's not the absolute worst movie I've ever seen, this movie is so bad that i can barely call this a super hero movie, let alone a Spider-man movie. While the action is great, the characters and story freaking blow. The characters are either morons or aholes. The only character I like in the film is Flint Marco AKA the Sand Man, everyone else I just wanna smack them in the face and it's story (while epic) is full of reckons and inconsistencies. Unless your completing the entire original Spider-Man collection or if your getting this movie out of curiosity, I strongly recommend you DON'T get this movie. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
jacobshoffDec 17, 2014
Wow this Spider-Man movie was so bad it ruined spider-man's name. I mean what a terrible movie. This particular Spider-Man installment is what made me turn away from spider-man. Just ruined everything i loved about my Childhood heroWow this Spider-Man movie was so bad it ruined spider-man's name. I mean what a terrible movie. This particular Spider-Man installment is what made me turn away from spider-man. Just ruined everything i loved about my Childhood hero Spider-Man. Just hate it period. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
KoplinsMay 9, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. this movie made me want to vomit.
this was a dissapointing. i saw this movie for the first time in 2009.
The Writing SUCKED. Nothing in this movie made me smile. im glad they rebooted it. but im also sad their rebooting it again
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
TRANSFORMERSFANMar 12, 2021
i like the first 2 spider man movies! but this movie sucks! one of the worst movies from 2007 along with bartz and epic movie!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
Ascended333Oct 25, 2021
Still smart, still exciting and still action-packed. It’s just a shame to note that,
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
DarkwingSchmuckMar 12, 2022
Sam Raimi's third and final Spider-Man outing is a miserable disappointment. While the cast is still overall good, the plot is overstuffed and convoluted -- at times relying on tropes that might not even be suitable for a daytime soap opera.Sam Raimi's third and final Spider-Man outing is a miserable disappointment. While the cast is still overall good, the plot is overstuffed and convoluted -- at times relying on tropes that might not even be suitable for a daytime soap opera. Spider-Man 3's misguided script is full of awkward melodrama, missing the fun and thrills of its two superb predecessors, while it also opts to forgo focusing on one charismatic villain for three dull and underwritten baddies. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
lesamoApr 11, 2022
A movie that had high potential led to a disastrous and boring movie. The writing of this movie is just terrible and the plot is just meh. At the end of the day, it is just a mid movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
ontApr 28, 2022
An incoherent story, too many villains and so many cringe/questionable moments, easily make this film one of the worst Spider-Man films and one of the worst Marvel films.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
thebigsMay 11, 2022
Way off the mark compared to the other 2...a poor villain a rubbish representation of the venom symbiote...Raimi got this one all wrong
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
cheatos080May 30, 2022
Хуже фильма про человека-паук я еще не видел...
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
Itzach2005Aug 25, 2022
Um dos filmes mais deploráveis que eu já vi, não dê ouvido a Fanboys que acham esse lixo bom, não há pontos positivos, afinal, a luta final é a única coisa boa e nem é tão excelente, de resto, é lixo, porcaria e bomba atrás de outra, nãoUm dos filmes mais deploráveis que eu já vi, não dê ouvido a Fanboys que acham esse lixo bom, não há pontos positivos, afinal, a luta final é a única coisa boa e nem é tão excelente, de resto, é lixo, porcaria e bomba atrás de outra, não surpreende o cancelamento. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews