Spider-Man 2

10

sil3nt_nickMar 27, 2013

Perfect. Nothing more to say.

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

0

Ascended333Oct 25, 2021

Most overrated superhero movie ever! It was just as bad as the first one!!!

14 of 28 users found this helpful1414

All this user's reviews

4

noob328Dec 8, 2020

Spider-Man 2 improved much more from the first one. The Villains, the action, the story and much more

7 of 14 users found this helpful77

All this user's reviews

8

JacobMay 3, 2014

While Spider-Man 2 is plagued by similar issues of the first one (primarily some cheesy dialogue and acting) this film is a significant improvement over the first one. It has the same likeable characters (with actors far more comfortable inWhile Spider-Man 2 is plagued by similar issues of the first one (primarily some cheesy dialogue and acting) this film is a significant improvement over the first one. It has the same likeable characters (with actors far more comfortable in their roles) and sense of the fun the first one has but also has much more meat. The story is far more interesting and engaging this time around and the presentation is well done as well. The villain could have been better integrated into the film but as it is its down ok and everything else is really good. Additionally, the villain is much better. Overall, this is a really good film. Fans of the first one should definitely check it out as they are going to be in for a good time as the film is another great installment in the franchise. Nonfans of the first one should check out two, especially if you thought the first one lacked any substance. This is one of the best superhero films to come out of Marvel (even ten years later) and is definitely worth your time.… Expand

3 of 6 users found this helpful33

All this user's reviews

9

SwatiFeb 12, 2013

A far superior film than the first one. The villain here is more intriguing and purposeful. Spider-man himself goes through some ups and downs. The fight scenes were cooler and riveting. MJ serves the purpose of 'damsel in distress' yetA far superior film than the first one. The villain here is more intriguing and purposeful. Spider-man himself goes through some ups and downs. The fight scenes were cooler and riveting. MJ serves the purpose of 'damsel in distress' yet again. I don't know anyone who would want to be with such an annoying person. Anyway, I enjoyed it.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

bfoore90Sep 16, 2016

I was 13 years old when Spider-Man 2 was released in 2004 and here we are, 12 years later and the film hasn't lost any luster. In this day and age, comic book movies are whats trending and even then, none of them quite compare to Spider-ManI was 13 years old when Spider-Man 2 was released in 2004 and here we are, 12 years later and the film hasn't lost any luster. In this day and age, comic book movies are whats trending and even then, none of them quite compare to Spider-Man 2. When a movie is successful, sequels are usually a given. Some sequels succeed in living up to their predecessor while others don’t always succeed. There could be a variety of reasons for this, sometimes actors can't or won't come back due to scheduling conflicts. Other times, greed driven studio interference forces drastic changes upon the film which in part hinders the film's success from the getgo. These things happen in Hollywood all the time in age of remakes and overdue sequels but this is not the case whatsoever with Spider-Man 2, a film which gets everything right, and does it so perfectly. The story is real and an emotionally driven journey of self-esteem and the boundaries of relationships and friendship when people are clouded by forces beyond their control. Tobey Maguire returns and puts on his best performance as the conflicted super-hero trying to juggle his crime fighting alter-ego and his attempt at an ordinary life of college and living alone while trying to pay bills and hold back his feelings for Mary Jane Watson.The film explores every avenue that deals in the consequences of Peter's duality and alter ego as he struggles mightily trying to balance his life. I can't say enough about Spider-Man 2 and just how perfect it was in almost every way.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

MrMovieBuffApr 28, 2017

'Spider-Man' (2002) was a fantastic introduction to the iconic Marvel character... director Sam Raimi was able to craft a thrilling - albeit, very violent - superhero movie where everyone was able to see the famous web-crawler swing into'Spider-Man' (2002) was a fantastic introduction to the iconic Marvel character... director Sam Raimi was able to craft a thrilling - albeit, very violent - superhero movie where everyone was able to see the famous web-crawler swing into action, and now, can he strike again with 'Spider-Man 2'? The answer is; not only can he strike again, but he does it so much better this time. Peter Parker (Tobey Maguire) is back, and while still in love with Mary Jane (Kirsten Dunst), he seems to be struggling balancing his life both being Spider-Man, trying to save the people of New York, and being Peter Parker, a student trying to catch up on work, and keeping his job. We see that Peter loses his job as a pizza delivery boy due to an inconvenience which led him to take action as Spider-Man, and even J. Jonah Jameson (J.K. Simmons), the editor of the Daily Bugle, is getting tired of Peter's lack of exceptional work. Peter is also struggling to keep up with Dr. Conners' (Dylan Baker) classes, life is clearly just too overcrowded for our young hero. It seems that his best friend, Harry (James Franco) is not too keen on Peter taking pictures of Spider-Man for the Daily Bugle, as Harry is still not over the fact that Spider-Man (who is his best friend as well) may or may not have killed his father. Harry wants Spider-Man to pay for the pain that he has caused him over that time, which obviously puts Peter in a difficult position, because Harry could easily find out eventually. We meet an enthusiastic scientist named Dr. Octavious (Alfred Molina), who plans to create a fusion power project that has been sponsored by Harry, who is now head of the Oscorp division since his father's tragic passing. Peter befriends Octavious, who even gives him advice on how to woo a girl, since Peter is finding it difficult to impress Mary Jane. During the fusion presentation, Dr. Octavious introduces the crowd to four, mechanical and electrical arms that are used to protect him while handling hazardous equipment. The fear that the advanced A.I. technology could overwhelm both his intelligence and mentality come true, as when the presentation goes wrong, and many are either left hurt or injured, Octavious then becomes slaves to the metal arms and pursues a life of crime to get the project running again. It seems that Peter may not be the man up for this, he starts to feel as if he is losing his powers, and gives up becoming Spider-Man. While he does, it seems that he is able to focus on the more important things in life such as; keeping up with school work, and living peacefully. But, when the crime in New York rises, many start to wonder where is Spider-Man?

'Spider-Man 2' is a fun and riveting, and at times, dramatic adventure. Sam Raimi was able to take everything he did well from the first movie, and he doesn't double it, or make it bigger... instead, he adds to it. He adds more features to this movie which makes it outshine the first. Molina is fantastic as the vulnerable Dr. Octavious, who reluctantly becomes a villain to get what he wants, even though he clearly doesn't want to hurt anybody. The way this movie explores the vulnerability of the main villain adds to the tension and drama. 'Spider-Man 2' is, in short, amazing.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

Dragonfly44May 5, 2018

A truly amazing superhero movie. The story is spectacular and the greatly updated special effects make this movie fantastic. Good acting, loveable characters, a great villain and a stupendous love story are why this movie is just . . . Good.A truly amazing superhero movie. The story is spectacular and the greatly updated special effects make this movie fantastic. Good acting, loveable characters, a great villain and a stupendous love story are why this movie is just . . . Good. Rating- 93%… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

TheTalkSep 23, 2018

Plenty call this the ultimate Spider-Man movie. The one that you can't literally say anything bad about, but, unfortunately, it's definitely got flaws. From Tobey's uncomfortable face expressions, to the screaming that is more hilarious thanPlenty call this the ultimate Spider-Man movie. The one that you can't literally say anything bad about, but, unfortunately, it's definitely got flaws. From Tobey's uncomfortable face expressions, to the screaming that is more hilarious than dramatic to the acting that has not aged too well. But, overall? This is one of the greatest comic book movies, indeed. I'd take this over a Captain America film anyday, because in the end, the corniness makes this film what it is and tells an excellent story of the popular franchise Spider-Man. Definitely a superior and total improvement from the first film.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

ErikTheCriticOct 5, 2018

Rarely does a sequel trump its original, but "Spider-Man 2" manages to do so with an extremely intriguing villain and higher emotional stakes.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

TomtagApr 14, 2019

This was much better than the first one. Alfred Molina's role as Doc Ock was as good as Willem Dafoe's green goblin.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

Compi24Nov 28, 2012

Taking nearly every element of the first film and elevating it, "Spider-Man 2" is everything a sequel should be and more.

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

8

survivorfan989Jul 1, 2013

A great sequel that follows on closely after the events of the first film. It's just as fast-paced and entertaining, and with the majority of the main players back for round two any fans of the first film will enjoy this one. Any of theA great sequel that follows on closely after the events of the first film. It's just as fast-paced and entertaining, and with the majority of the main players back for round two any fans of the first film will enjoy this one. Any of the Spider-Man films are certainly one of my favourites when it comes to Superhero movies, and this is no exception as its nothing but a joy to watch. I think the third and final chapter in this trilogy fell a little, but the sequel is a quality Action film … Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

8

JohnKristoferDec 22, 2014

From Great Power Comes With Great Responsibility! Is the moral of the movie.Peter Parker is struggling with his normal life and his powers,this movie is not just a superhero flick but also give us the sense of how hard is it to be aFrom Great Power Comes With Great Responsibility! Is the moral of the movie.Peter Parker is struggling with his normal life and his powers,this movie is not just a superhero flick but also give us the sense of how hard is it to be a superhero,in normal life you'll be facing many problems like love life,friends,Jobs and many More if being a superhero well you will be dealing with villains.Spider-Man 2 is well written and well directed but sometimes it's goofy but the goofiness of the movie make it more appealing unlike the sequel of the new reboot that looks like a video game.Spider-Man 2 is the best spider-man movie so far.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

8

JmsbppJul 16, 2013

Spider man cada vez escalando mas hacia un buen futuro................................................................................................

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

7

grandpajoe6191Sep 21, 2011

"Spider man 2" is decent. There is a lot to see but less to think or develop. Better to watch with your friends for pure joy, laughing at the corny dialogue and 'ooh-aah'ing at the impressive action sequences.

5 of 16 users found this helpful511

All this user's reviews

4

DavidJan 8, 2006

I guess you have to be a Spidey fan in order to love this movie. Still, I don't see how anyone can defend the horrible performances from James Franco or Kirsten Dunst. I guess if you're the kind of person who doesn't mind an I guess you have to be a Spidey fan in order to love this movie. Still, I don't see how anyone can defend the horrible performances from James Franco or Kirsten Dunst. I guess if you're the kind of person who doesn't mind an awful line like "go get em tiger", you will love this movie. I mean I can identify with Peter Parker. Like Doc Ock says I am also "smart, but lazy". I also have no idea how to talk to women. I should love this movie, but I can't look past the fact that it is not very well done. And stop talking about the special effects. They don't make a movie great. Especially when that movie rips off Superman II. If this movie had won Oscars, it would have been the most overrated movie of all time.… Expand

3 of 10 users found this helpful

2

TerryD.Jul 3, 2004

I guess I wouldn't make a very good movie producer because I would have shelved this thing and missed out on all the money it?s raking in. Why is it doing that I ask myself ? who knows because as far as I?m concerned this is nothing I guess I wouldn't make a very good movie producer because I would have shelved this thing and missed out on all the money it?s raking in. Why is it doing that I ask myself ? who knows because as far as I?m concerned this is nothing more than some touchy-feely love story, finding one self, soap opera with over-special-effected ?action? scenes. Heck, I got the feeling the only reason those were there at all was to break-up the monotony of Peter Parker wondering around being torn over his, life, loves, purpose, blah, blah, blah. Yikes, I paid money to see this dribble. … Expand

3 of 12 users found this helpful

0

plebbitFeb 19, 2022

it wasn't that good, at least not good enough to earn a 8.9 rating, I have to admit I like watching this but wow, it surely doesn't deserve such an effervescence

3 of 12 users found this helpful39

All this user's reviews

8

drlowdonApr 22, 2014

With Parker continuing to struggle with the responsibility of being a superhero the Spider-Man sequel is as successful at combining action, comedy and character development as the first movie . Doctor Octopus also provides a great nemesis forWith Parker continuing to struggle with the responsibility of being a superhero the Spider-Man sequel is as successful at combining action, comedy and character development as the first movie . Doctor Octopus also provides a great nemesis for the hero and the fight scenes between the two make for some excellent action sequences. Highly recommended.… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

6

spadenxDec 9, 2011

Pretty much the same as I felt about the previous film. I didnt like the acting much but the action was good and it was entertaining for the most part. It could get rather dull though and that did take away from it.

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

6

BarneyOnMTJan 6, 2016

WHAT I LIKED: A film that's overall an improvement over it's predecessor, 'Spider Man 2' has much more character and relationship development that makes the film appear more realistic, you can empathise more with Peter in this film too, andWHAT I LIKED: A film that's overall an improvement over it's predecessor, 'Spider Man 2' has much more character and relationship development that makes the film appear more realistic, you can empathise more with Peter in this film too, and the special effects and action are well improved over the first. The villain is also feels more dangerous and less bizzare and comical as the Green Goblin did in the first.
WHAT I DIDN'T LIKE: It's still very cheesy and cliched, and it's not excatly the most interesting of plots. It also lacks character arcs and sub-stories that could make it more layered.
VERDICT: A successful sequel to say the least, this is much improved over the first thanks to it's new focus on emotional elemtns and character relationships.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

0

mailpollFeb 17, 2022

I guess you have to be a Spidey fan in order to love this movie. Still, I don't see how anyone can defend the horrible performances from James Franco or Kirsten Dunst

2 of 10 users found this helpful28

All this user's reviews

0

Gamer44Dec 5, 2012

my question is how did spider-man 2 score better than the first instalment. Spider-man 2 is 50 times worse than the first spider-man movie the story is worse,the acting is 100 times worse and toby maquire is acts more and more like a baboonmy question is how did spider-man 2 score better than the first instalment. Spider-man 2 is 50 times worse than the first spider-man movie the story is worse,the acting is 100 times worse and toby maquire is acts more and more like a baboon and is acting still sucks.How people liked this movie is mind boggling.one word to describe the movie "Terrible".Once again this is one of the worst movie sequels in the history of sequels.… Expand

3 of 22 users found this helpful319

All this user's reviews

0

TheRealnessJul 4, 2006

[***SPOILERS***] Where to begin? The plot of this film is incoherent. Doctor Octopus needs those tentacles to...do what exactly? All he does with them in the lab scene (his lab in a residential space) is press a button. Later on, the villian [***SPOILERS***] Where to begin? The plot of this film is incoherent. Doctor Octopus needs those tentacles to...do what exactly? All he does with them in the lab scene (his lab in a residential space) is press a button. Later on, the villian robs a bank for...money that he will use to...do what? Buy lab equipment? Does anyone see the stupidity here? Why not just take what you want? The best of all: Doc Ock goes to James Franco and demands the precious McGuffin of 'tridium.' Rather than just ransack Franco's home and take it, or torture him and take it, Ock makes an unncessary deal to risk his life and hunt down Spider-Man for it. Smart. Onto the dialogue. What young people talk as Tobey and that hideous actress do in this film? 'Go get'em tiger?' Seriously? This is what happens when 50 year old Hollywood hacks write for allegedly cool young people. That the actors did not speak up proves they were out to cash a check. The public, inc. the critics, is brainwashed by an assault of hype into liking this dreck. People so desperately want to like it, that they overlook wack, weak plot and dialogue. 'It's just a summer movie,' is no excuse. Just because I am in a movie theater doesn't mean I have to check logic and common sense at the door. But in a culture where people are content eating fast food day in and day out while listening to Ashlee Simpson and reading US Weekly, why should anyone be suprised this movie is a hit? Kirsten Dunst is another issue altogether. Apparently just because someone is on a big screen or magazine covers, they become pretty. This girl's face in those ECU shots is downright scary. She belongs in an old Raimi zombie flick. But again, if you luck into a big role because you've been chasing fame since you were a child actress, then you just become pretty. Become famous in our society and suddenly you also become physically attractive? Finally, Raimi's cheese shots of people screaming is just wack camp. Much preferred Nolan's Batman.… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful

1

MarkW.May 4, 2007

This was possibly the worst movie I have ever seen.

0 of 3 users found this helpful

1

AndrewM.Jul 8, 2004

This film was awful. The classic dilemma of Peter Parker simply does not translate to present day. Our hero is a man in love with a woman he can't have regardless of how many times he is forced to repel her advances. His obstacle to This film was awful. The classic dilemma of Peter Parker simply does not translate to present day. Our hero is a man in love with a woman he can't have regardless of how many times he is forced to repel her advances. His obstacle to ecstasy with MJ is his fear that his enemies might exploit the obvious weakness a superhero's girlfriend would inherently be. Who thinks this way? Any man, in a similar situation, would nail the chick without fear or remorse. This heroic dilemna is so alien to the audience they actually have to explicitly state the hero's dilemna. And...of course...in a truly risky casting move...NYC is cast as the innocent victim of the crime our Anthro-Arachnid friend must fight. What I find so absurd is the ridiculously high score awarded this film by the meta-critic crowd. Is everyone on the payroll of this film? Please Tobey...end it now and go back to independent film!!!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

0

FrankR.Jul 4, 2006

Couple things... 1. Just because someone coined a lame, corny catch phrase for a character in a comic book for people with 3rd-grade reading comp is no excuse for using said lame line in a 200 million dollar film. 2. Just because the lame, Couple things... 1. Just because someone coined a lame, corny catch phrase for a character in a comic book for people with 3rd-grade reading comp is no excuse for using said lame line in a 200 million dollar film. 2. Just because the lame, corny, 'Go get'em tiger' line was used in the comic does not mean it is good, or should be used in the film version. 3. 3. If I want to read a comic, I'll buy a comic. If I want to go see a movie, even one BASED ON a comic, I hope to get a storyline and dialogue of higher quality than that offered in the comic. Spider-Man 2 fails to offer a coherent plot. It's dialogue is lame. Finally, even those die-hard comic fans will reject the 3rd installment of this crap-- Topher Grace as Venom. I'm no comic expert, but I thought Venom was, like, muscular and imposing. I also thought the costume was black with a white spider, not that corny-looking thing on the trailer.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful

4

ArnieG.Apr 27, 2007

Extremely overrated. Unbearably corny and sappy by times. Although I'm sure this is straight from the comics but why does Peter have to know all his villians personally before they become villians? I find this unrealistic plot point Extremely overrated. Unbearably corny and sappy by times. Although I'm sure this is straight from the comics but why does Peter have to know all his villians personally before they become villians? I find this unrealistic plot point distracting but I'm willing to get over it if the movie worked...which I found only when the action kicked in gear. I loved the first Spidey, thought it was stylish and rang true...here's hoping that Spidey 3 is more like the first.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful

6

cowbell31Jun 22, 2012

Spider-Man 2 has a good villain but Raimi thinks he can fit such emotional drama with a little love story that the movie would've been fine without. Doc Oct was a great villain who was played perfectly and who could have stole the show, ifSpider-Man 2 has a good villain but Raimi thinks he can fit such emotional drama with a little love story that the movie would've been fine without. Doc Oct was a great villain who was played perfectly and who could have stole the show, if not for Kirsten Dunst and her stupid part.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

3

LuiszJun 3, 2014

After the very good spider-man (2002), this sequel makes no sense, Peter is a loser who never does anything scientific as in the comic and has no charisma. The only good thing is Alfred Molina.

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

8

AaronWasserman2May 4, 2014

Overhyped? absoultetly. but still alot of fun! with an incrdible score, as the whole trilogy has, Raimi kicks it up a notch for this sequel. while still being campy Spider-Man 2 brings in more drama that does get over the top. Spider-Man 2Overhyped? absoultetly. but still alot of fun! with an incrdible score, as the whole trilogy has, Raimi kicks it up a notch for this sequel. while still being campy Spider-Man 2 brings in more drama that does get over the top. Spider-Man 2 one of the best comic book movies ever? no but it does hold a place for one of the best comic book movie fight scenes ever....the train sequence… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

BernolsvenJan 26, 2015

[Portuguese] Decaiu em comparação com o primeiro filme mas continuou bem legal de se ver, vi várias vezes, mas esse Homem-Aranha já estava começando a me incomodar devido ao seu jeito chorão.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

aadityamudharApr 18, 2016

A great sequel that follows on closely after the events of the first film. It's just as fast-paced and entertaining, and with the majority of the main players back for round two any fans of the first film will enjoy this one. Any of theA great sequel that follows on closely after the events of the first film. It's just as fast-paced and entertaining, and with the majority of the main players back for round two any fans of the first film will enjoy this one. Any of the Spider-Man films are certainly one of my favourites when it comes to Superhero movies, and this is no exception as its nothing but a joy to watch. I think the third and final chapter in this trilogy fell a little, but the sequel is a quality Action film.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

EpicLadySpongeJan 22, 2016

While Spider-Man being the best of the franchise, this second runner-up still has its visual details from the first movie and bought us the chillness back.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

FilmClubMar 27, 2016

The pleasure is doubled in “Spider-Man 2.” Crackerjack entertainment from start to finish, this rousing yarn about a reluctant superhero and his equally conflicted friends and enemies improves in every way on its predecessor and is arguablyThe pleasure is doubled in “Spider-Man 2.” Crackerjack entertainment from start to finish, this rousing yarn about a reluctant superhero and his equally conflicted friends and enemies improves in every way on its predecessor and is arguably about as good a live-action picture as anyone’s ever made using comicbook characters.

In one of those occasional examples of sequelmakers setting their sights higher the second time around and mostly hitting the mark, director Sam Raimi, producers Laura Ziskin and Avi Arad & Co., rather than equating bigger with better, have conscientiously applied themselves to improving all aspects of the franchise. Conspicuously, the action sequences are more exciting, the visual effects — particularly Spider-Man’s swings through the canyons of Manhattan — are far more natural and compelling and even Danny Elfman’s score is improved.

Most importantly, however, the script provides a depth and dramatic balance quite rare in this sort of fare. Alvin Sargent, a distinguished vet screenwriter best known for such estimable character-driven fare as “Paper Moon,” “Julia,” “Ordinary People” and “Unfaithful,” did uncredited rewrites on the first “Spider-Man.” Here, working from a story devised by Alfred Gough, Miles Millar and Michael Chabon, he makes at least five characters into tortured souls with momentous decisions to make and places them all in a narrative frame within which the related elements are adroitly proportioned. Result is an object lesson in how, even for this sort of fare, the script can very much be the thing.

Unlike the last round of “Batman” films, which got sillier with each installment, “Spider-Man” is on the upswing, an impression fostered even by the opening credits, which resemble the comicbook style of those in the original but incorporate arresting renderings of key scenes to recapitulate the first picture’s story.

At the outset, Spider-Man is on a sort of hiatus, taking a back seat to the bumbling efforts of Peter Parker (Tobey Maguire) to juggle his studies at Columbia with part-time gigs taking pictures for the tabloid Daily Bugle and delivering pizzas on a strict schedule, which even Spidey’s best web-swinging can’t manage successfully.

Opening section quickly pulls the viewer close to Peter by sympathetically and amusingly detailing the difficulties of his struggle to make ends meet in a tough city. He’s constantly reminded of his inexpressible feelings for Mary Jane (Kirsten Dunst), whose face on a perfume campaign is plastered all over the city and who’s enjoying success onstage in a revival of “The Importance of Being Earnest.”

Driven by a deep need to succeed where his father Norman failed, and still tormented over his death, Harry Osborn (James Franco) has invested heavily in the research of scientific genius Dr. Otto Octavius (Alfred Molina), who believes he’s on the verge of creating a source of perpetual energy through sustained fusion. As the altruistic Octavius tells the admiring Peter, who intends to write his thesis on him, this breakthrough will put “the power of the sun in the palm of my hand.”

But just as Norman Osborn’s experiment turned him into a demented villain, so does Octavius’; in front of numerous onlookers, his electrical gizmos bust a gut and his four enormous metal “activators” turn into murderous tentacles of staggering speed and strength, and capable of transporting the creature soon to be dubbed Dr. Octopus, or Doc Ock, up and down walls with ease.

At the story’s precise midway point, Peter tosses his Spider-Man costume in the trash.

A light-hearted interlude, cheekily accompanied by “Raindrops Keep Fallin’ on My Head,” illustrates the more balanced and happier young man Peter is able to become without the specter of Spider-Man constantly hovering over him; he hopes his fresh approach to life will win Mary Jane over before it’s too late, and in the bargain confesses to Aunt May his guilt for his part in the death of Uncle Ben (Cliff Robertson, seen in one quasi-dream sequence).

The new emotional levels and increased opportunities provided by the script give the actors a chance to stretch, and they all respond, none more than Maguire. Running the gamut from heroic knight to heartbroken suitor, thesp is a constant delight, his lightness of touch providing many grace notes to what was already a lively characterization.

Dunst gets more screentime than before and fleshes out the damsel-in-distress aspects of her part with a nice portrait of a young woman trying to figure out where her future lies. With Aunt May finally, after two years of mourning, trying to move on, Harris has much more to do and does it with her customary excellence, and Franco pushes Harry into an unanticipated dark realm.

Molina’s initial geniality morphs into a determined but unmaniacal evil, although the lack of a specific focus for his destructiveness makes Doc Ock's real purpose a bit fuzzy.

A great follow-up to Spider-Man!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

Kes4278Jul 31, 2017

Another great movie. This is even better than the first one.And the first one was AMAZING.Another great job by Tobey and the rest of the cast.Give a 10

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

CTHReviewsMar 7, 2018

This movie has dazzling effects and action, but I'm sorry, I can't help but be annoyed by how stupid Peter has become, how even more **** Mary Jane has come, and how idiotic Harry is thinking that just because Peter takes pictures ofThis movie has dazzling effects and action, but I'm sorry, I can't help but be annoyed by how stupid Peter has become, how even more **** Mary Jane has come, and how idiotic Harry is thinking that just because Peter takes pictures of Spider-Man, automatically means that Peter knows who Spider-Man is. It also doesn't help that Spider-Man's powers disappear for no realistic biological reason. I can't believe people just gloss over these flaws.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

MarvelJoeSep 13, 2018

Seeing Peter Parker trying to be himself as Spider-Man is a struggle, emotional, and accurate of how things are in real life which is why it's my favorite superhero movie ever.

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

9

DeepKamateApr 6, 2018

Without a doubt, this is the best movie about "Spider-Man" of all time. In it there is literally everything that we love in superhero movies: action, plot, villain, great shooting, beautiful picture and atmosphere. There is also lots of theWithout a doubt, this is the best movie about "Spider-Man" of all time. In it there is literally everything that we love in superhero movies: action, plot, villain, great shooting, beautiful picture and atmosphere. There is also lots of the director's unique insanity in it, but I think it only benefited the film. It is unlikely that noone will be able to film "Spider-Man" better.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

BrunoVn00Mar 31, 2019

An example of how to make the perfect sequel, a movie far superior than the original. Spider-Man 2 is not only a great superhero summer flick, it's actually a great movie too. This movie actually gives main character Peter Parker a realisticAn example of how to make the perfect sequel, a movie far superior than the original. Spider-Man 2 is not only a great superhero summer flick, it's actually a great movie too. This movie actually gives main character Peter Parker a realistic internal conflict: Should he continue to be Spider-Man and struggle to keep a normal life? Or should he stop being Spider-Man and have a normal life? This movie focuses on that conflict leading to the best writing, directing and acting of the trilogy and probably from any live-action Spider-Man movie.
The action scenes are way better and more intense than the previous film, the train fight scene is probably one of the most memorable and best action scenes in any superhero movie ever.
After all, this is still a Sam Raimi Spider-Man movie and there's some cheesy stuff like some dialogue and some scenes (like I think the Dr. Octopus hospital scene was supposed to be horryfing and turned out to be unintentionally funny).

This is an amazing superhero movie, one of the best ever made and till this day the best live-action Spider-Man movie ever. This is one of the movies that truly showed the world that superhero movies can be competent movies and not just dumb action.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

clem666Feb 4, 2022

It is definitely a hard task to find any mixed or nuanced reviews about this movie. I have to admit I like watching this but wow, it surely doesn't deserve such an effervescence !
Special effects didn't aged that bad and remain quite pleasantIt is definitely a hard task to find any mixed or nuanced reviews about this movie. I have to admit I like watching this but wow, it surely doesn't deserve such an effervescence !
Special effects didn't aged that bad and remain quite pleasant to see. The story isn't that original but benefits from a great pace in general. Acting varies between amazing (especially for James Franco), cheesy on McGuire's side or inexistent (speaking of Kristen Dunst in particular). The soundtrack is decent and the fast-paced action scenes are terrific. I would say the major issue with this movie is the predictability of its scenario and the numerous clichés it manages to gather.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

6

jastineNov 30, 2021

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ

0 of 5 users found this helpful05

All this user's reviews

10

GavinLynchJan 18, 2022

Idc what anyone says but Spider-Man 2 is better then the MCU. Fight me as this movie was a masterpiece.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

plushcollectorJan 28, 2022

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It's very boring and slow. The redemption arc is nice, and the story is fine, but it is very boring and overrated. Kirsten Dunst is horrible, Tobey maguire is mediocre, and the rest (except for the rare good action) is very, very, slow.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

SteveRogers1351Jan 29, 2022

Omg after 17 years this movie is still amazing! It holds up so well this movie.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

JayHawk247Jan 31, 2022

I rewatched this after years and I appreciate this movie so much more. The most faithful comic adaptation I’ve ever seen.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

BillB.Jul 30, 2006

amazing from start to finish. spider-man is without a doubt the best comic character to be translated to the big screen.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

Anthonyl.Aug 10, 2006

I just caught this movie on hbo again the other day and damn do i love this movie. it really does have everything mixed into one movie. it captures the spirit of the comic book perfectly, while also translating to mainstream audiences. i canI just caught this movie on hbo again the other day and damn do i love this movie. it really does have everything mixed into one movie. it captures the spirit of the comic book perfectly, while also translating to mainstream audiences. i can not wait for the next one.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

RirenJan 31, 2007

Quite possibly the best superhero movie of all time. You have all the high-powered action scenes, a great sense of humor, and ritual symbolism that would even get Joseph Campbell's mind stirring. It's long, but well-paced, and Quite possibly the best superhero movie of all time. You have all the high-powered action scenes, a great sense of humor, and ritual symbolism that would even get Joseph Campbell's mind stirring. It's long, but well-paced, and never forgets its sense of humility. By the end, Spider-Man's world is ripe for further installments, and anyone who ever walked through a toy aisle or played recess will want to see them.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

HaydenFeb 14, 2007

A very strong, intelligent and emotional movie. Most likely one of the greatest movies ever. Anonymous needs to seek therapy.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

SteveOMay 7, 2008

It was a good movie. Not a classic like the original and not atrocious like its successor.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JimmyWJun 13, 2008

Great action movie but it showed tremendous emotion. Great story, great movie, end of story.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JoeMAug 10, 2008

This film has everything going for it. Freat special effects and action sequences, craking dialogue, a terrific performance from Maguire and Molina. Just like a Spider-man comic brought to the big screen with all the heart, fun and This film has everything going for it. Freat special effects and action sequences, craking dialogue, a terrific performance from Maguire and Molina. Just like a Spider-man comic brought to the big screen with all the heart, fun and excitement. If you so much as like superhero movies, you should love this.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JonathanS.Feb 26, 2009

Having re-watched this recently--and perhaps this partially a nostalgic bias--this is undoubtedly the greatest comic book film ever made. Hands down. Just the sheer level of enjoyment that it evokes, without sacrificing intelligence, acting, Having re-watched this recently--and perhaps this partially a nostalgic bias--this is undoubtedly the greatest comic book film ever made. Hands down. Just the sheer level of enjoyment that it evokes, without sacrificing intelligence, acting, direction, any of that--it's literally one of the few movies that contains the pure entertainment that has been lost more and more since the golden days of adventure back in the 70s. The Dark Knight had it's own post-humous/intense hype awe factor, but in terms of how many times you can just sit back and watch the film, while being consistently entertained--the only film that comes close is Iron Man. But nothing holds a candle to Spidey 2.Nothing.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

ParthM.Aug 16, 2004

It was the greatest movie in all of history. no better movie than this. I don't read bad reviews for this movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JamaalR.Dec 15, 2005

Oh My God. I see all of you neigh-sayers complaining about this movie. Some of you go as far as to say that it is nothing like the comic. Trust me, anyone who reads the comics or even follow it slightly will tell you that this is what you Oh My God. I see all of you neigh-sayers complaining about this movie. Some of you go as far as to say that it is nothing like the comic. Trust me, anyone who reads the comics or even follow it slightly will tell you that this is what you will and should get from the movie. It "is" EXACTLY LIKE THE COMIC.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JayE.Mar 27, 2006

There are plenty of superhero movies that provide gratuitous action--action with no cost or reason. This movie takes the time to look at its characters, develop them, raise the stakes for them, thus giving the action reason. Then we care if There are plenty of superhero movies that provide gratuitous action--action with no cost or reason. This movie takes the time to look at its characters, develop them, raise the stakes for them, thus giving the action reason. Then we care if Aunt May is taken hostage, or whether Doc will win that fight. Yes, this means less action. Gasp! But with more riding on it, it is a lot more satisfying.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

Joeg.Jul 16, 2006

Without a doubt the best comic book movie of all time. this movie had it all. and it is easy to see that frank r. and the realness are the same exact person trying to bring the score down, because of some asinine hatred of this movie, so i amWithout a doubt the best comic book movie of all time. this movie had it all. and it is easy to see that frank r. and the realness are the same exact person trying to bring the score down, because of some asinine hatred of this movie, so i am here to rectify that.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

JBAug 11, 2006

Great acting from Raimi and the rest of the cast (except Dunst). [***SPOILERS***] Unfortunately the lines were terrible as between Parker and Mary Jane, and the 'happy-go-lucky' scene with Parker after 'losing' his powers Great acting from Raimi and the rest of the cast (except Dunst). [***SPOILERS***] Unfortunately the lines were terrible as between Parker and Mary Jane, and the 'happy-go-lucky' scene with Parker after 'losing' his powers is an inappropriate splash of camp in what has been a serious, if light hearted, adaptation endeavor.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

AnsonG.Mar 5, 2007

Lighten up people. Its not hard to love this movie unless you have absolutely no ability of knowing good entertainment when u see it. Tobey Maguire is great as Peter Parker, Kirsten Dunst Lovely as MJ, Alfred Molina an outstanding classic Lighten up people. Its not hard to love this movie unless you have absolutely no ability of knowing good entertainment when u see it. Tobey Maguire is great as Peter Parker, Kirsten Dunst Lovely as MJ, Alfred Molina an outstanding classic machined villain as Dr. Octavious turned Docock. Every member of the cast is superb in their big or small roles, Sam Raimi the director seems very sure of the script and his directing and makes every scene worth watching. Add to that a good story, fabulous, marvelous special effects and visual sequences, an outstanding, fully suitable score, sound effects beyond your wildest dreams , a red-blue spidey Spandex otfit, a chuuby guys in a brown coat with four mecha-arms...well how can you not like it??? So, either you are a fan of the comics, like superhero movies, or not, you really have to enjoy this movie. SO DONT MISS IT!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

RandyM.Apr 10, 2007

The best comic book movie ever made. No...no....let me rephrase that. This is one of the greatest movies of all time. Absolutely powerful and just plain fun to watch.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

TomKMay 4, 2007

This movie is the best comic book adaptation, and is much better than spider man 1. It was a funnier, has more emotion and heart, great story, and a fantastic action with amazing CGI on doc oc. Spiderman 1 was more of an intro, but spiderman This movie is the best comic book adaptation, and is much better than spider man 1. It was a funnier, has more emotion and heart, great story, and a fantastic action with amazing CGI on doc oc. Spiderman 1 was more of an intro, but spiderman 2 displayed the wrenching consequences that comes along with having all this power.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JeffVFeb 14, 2008

The greatest comic book film of all time...so far. This one had it all. It had wonderful writing that dealt with angst,ambition, loss, love, and redemption and it did so with heart as well as a dash of humor. It had well written characters The greatest comic book film of all time...so far. This one had it all. It had wonderful writing that dealt with angst,ambition, loss, love, and redemption and it did so with heart as well as a dash of humor. It had well written characters that were multi-faceted and it had a talented cast to bring these charcters to life. It's action sequences(the train fight was incredible!!!)that were intense and entertaining, but never overshadowed the characters. Good stuff indeed!!!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

PeterOct 27, 2005

Hey Anonymous, "go get em tiger" is Mary Jane's catch phrase from the comic, so it's pretty easy to defend.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

anneonymousSep 29, 2006

This was one of the best movies I have ever seen. The special effects were spectacular.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

BobR.Nov 24, 2007

An incredible work of art. Much improved from the first Spider-man, this movie is possibly the best super hero film of all time.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

TokyochuchuJul 9, 2017

Spider-Man 2 is one of the best super-hero movies ever made. The action scenes are decent, but it's the emotional heft of the story and the innocence of Maguire's Spidey that really connects. You just can't help but root for such aSpider-Man 2 is one of the best super-hero movies ever made. The action scenes are decent, but it's the emotional heft of the story and the innocence of Maguire's Spidey that really connects. You just can't help but root for such a good-hearted, self sacrificing hero.… Expand