Universal Pictures | Release Date: December 21, 2016
6.4
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 287 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
163
Mixed:
79
Negative:
45
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
6
BikerjamesMar 31, 2017
The animation and visual look of "Sing" is excellent. The story is simple, but not altogether predictable. Not sure what the moral of the movie is, but I guess it would be to follow your dream no matter what. If you're going to have aThe animation and visual look of "Sing" is excellent. The story is simple, but not altogether predictable. Not sure what the moral of the movie is, but I guess it would be to follow your dream no matter what. If you're going to have a really simple story, then you should make the movie as funny as possible. That's where the film fails for me. I didn't laugh all that much. It tries hard to be funny, and may succeed with small children, but not so much for adults. The strangest part of the film is the Mom pig who creates an automated system for taking care of her large family while she is at rehearsals. In a single night she creates a majorly complex auto feed, auto laundry system that would make NASA proud. She needs to be an inventor, not a singer. Not a horrible film, but could have been better. Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
6
pardogatoJan 22, 2017
An unfinished mashup of Cinema Paradiso with the (already overseen) formula of Kurosawa’s Seven Samurai, Sing feels uncomplete as a musical fable, to become just a showcase of music samples and good jokes. On the bright side, the music isAn unfinished mashup of Cinema Paradiso with the (already overseen) formula of Kurosawa’s Seven Samurai, Sing feels uncomplete as a musical fable, to become just a showcase of music samples and good jokes. On the bright side, the music is enjoyable and the film does not even try to address social or political themes, which is absolutely not necessary. Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
6
sensorglitchJan 9, 2017
This movie was predictable and derivative. However, I enjoyed it. I liked the songs that they did, I thought it was genuinely cute. I was a little bit irritated by the giant plot hole, but other than that it was a very decent movie.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
EpicLadySpongeDec 21, 2016
Sing relies too much on singing than going what's behind the purpose of the film. If there's like literally anything I have learned from this movie, it's that songs can easily get annoying throughout majority of this movie's screen time.
8 of 11 users found this helpful83
All this user's reviews
5
SomePersonaJan 1, 2017
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. NO SPOILERS AT ALL

Sing is a bleh movie. It's a bunch of clichés in every sort or form wrapped together with pretty animation. The use of songs in this movie is just terrible; they use almost every overused song in movies out of the book. The song use is so terrible I was actually able to predict three of the songs that would play next! It's an offense to music and just barely not an offense to film. Just bleh.
Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
5
TVJerryDec 22, 2016
This singing competition takes place in a world inhabited by all types of animals, but there's no winner…just a group of contestants who each have a backstory. While the characters are sometimes charming and voiced by an all-star castThis singing competition takes place in a world inhabited by all types of animals, but there's no winner…just a group of contestants who each have a backstory. While the characters are sometimes charming and voiced by an all-star cast (Matthew McConaughey, Seth MacFarlane, Reese Witherspoon, Scarlett Johansson), the writing is bland. There's little genuine humor, but there is a touch of heart. On the other hand, there are LOTS of songs, some with spirited arrangements and good performances. While it's ultimately uninspired, there's an energy that propels the action. Plus, with almost non-stop singing and lots of pop hits, it never gets boring. Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
5
FuturedirectorFeb 21, 2017
Sing offers a cheerful entertainment, blessed by a strong voice cast, but that is not enough to stop it's unbelievable storytelling, cliched characters and an undeniably thin plot.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
43in2014Dec 22, 2016
Related media: There are no media related to this film.
>
What's it like?: It is like a combination of the backstage stories to reality TV singing competition shows such as American Idol and the written stories of TV series such as Glee, but
Related media: There are no media related to this film.
>
What's it like?: It is like a combination of the backstage stories to reality TV singing competition shows such as American Idol and the written stories of TV series such as Glee, but with animals… much fewer animals than what was advertised in the trailer. It’s not original. Children and teenagers could be fooled into liking it due to its numerous pop songs, but there is insufficient story and there are not enough good laughs. As a results, adults would find it middling.
>
Cons: >
1. For much of the film, it seemed like there was nothing special going on and that the film was merely propped up by the numerous recognisable pop songs. The last 20 minutes was much better, but even then there were only covers of pop songs apart from one new original song. Even so, that original song was not memorable.
>
2. One would think that the film would cover the long story behind each season of a reality TV singing competition show, but the potential number of ‘contestants’ were chopped down drastically at the first cut, to just seven acts! That seemed too few and too lacking in variety and talents. It was as if there was insufficient budget to get enough famous voice actors to voice for the animals! >
Pros: Cons #2 ends up being a master stroke. There could have been too many acts if the format of American Idol was followed. More is not always better. More could end up stalling the film by having one pop song come after another. With fewer ‘contestants’, the end of the film felt sharper and sooner, which is good. >
How would the different age groups rate it?
Children: Excellent.
Teens: Good.
Young adults: Average
Medium age adults: Average
Old adults: Average.
>
My rating: 3/5 (no half scores). Save you money and watch it on TV.
Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
6
russiangamerMar 19, 2017
Вообще не смешно. Юмор СЛИШКОМ детский. Так же мультфильм не предлагает только ничего нового. Если бы не хороший саундтрек, то он был бы просто слит..Вообще не смешно. Юмор СЛИШКОМ детский. Так же мультфильм не предлагает только ничего нового. Если бы не хороший саундтрек, то он был бы просто слит..
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
TrevorsViewApr 28, 2017
Well, I can certainly understand why the Golden Globes loved Illumination’s thespian-infested movie.

Based around something as universally understood as music, Sing seems to be an appropriate first-time directing effort by the duo
Well, I can certainly understand why the Golden Globes loved Illumination’s thespian-infested movie.

Based around something as universally understood as music, Sing seems to be an appropriate first-time directing effort by the duo Christopher Lourdelet and Garth Jennings (who directed live action before). The result of their hard work brings a passable accomplishment by the studio’s sixth ever full-length feature, even if no studio gamechanger nonetheless.

The feature takes place in an unnamed San Fran-Los Angeles-esque city painted by Miami, home to many anthropomorphic mammals, reptiles, birds, primates, household pets, cephalopods, arachnids, and whales. We focus on six mammals: one a producer, five the lucky choices for his theater-saving singing competition. Plenty celebrity voices deliver occasionally terrific singing, although the minor roles’ unfitting voices draw back the overall quality. Surprisingly however, the anthropomorphic individuals’ subplots are all masterfully balanced in their yearnings on the road to fame and fortune:

Buster Moon the koala (Matthew McConaughey) wants to keep the theater financially stable after his father passed down the torch. Despite being the lead, he is the least interesting cast member, more existing to vocalize the cliché morals. Though he still plays great off the more colorful characters, including his dimwitted senior secretary, Miss Crawly the iguana.

Rosita the pig (Reese Witherspoon) wants to follow her passion away from her uncaring husband and twenty-five children. She soon meets unexpected challenges when the competition pairs her with an overly optimistic pig named Gunter. This widely marketed chunk of ham shockingly gets little stage time; and I should also mention how he flaunts an indistinguishable European accent exaggerated to the point of annoyance. The immature will worship him like Moccus, leaving adults to gag a bit while watching an overweight swine in a unitard stereotyping western culture.

Johnny the gorilla (Taron Egerton) wants to escape his father’s criminal lifestyle, and follow his heart for the microphone. Boys across all ages will relate to this highly soulful musician, despite a phoned in resolution to his subplot.

Ash the porcupine (Scarlett Johansson) seeks public appreciation alongside her boyfriend/musical partner. While her story feels relatively unengaging compared to the others, she still brings a nice voice, especially when her guitar strums electrify her quills to the point of showering out.

Mike the mouse (Seth MacFarlane) needs the prize money to pay back a bear gang who see him as a tasty meal. His ratty account maybe could have benefited from higher stakes against the law; but it does not matter anyway, for this crude comedian providing the voice amazingly makes a tiny crooner so ruggedly lovable with some spice thrown in.

Meena the elephant (Tori Kelly) cannot pursue her love for singing, as her glossophobia gets in the way, with no thanks to her arrogant grandfather. She has the most poorly balanced yet easily relatable experience for all the boys and girls facing a similar fear.

Together, doubt gets conquered in a unified walk to fame and fortune. So who ends up winning the competition?

It doesn’t matter! They are all too introspective to notice one another, as these well-rounded individual stories have zero interweaving amongst one another. In the end, Sing cares less about teamwork, and more about getting children to worship the most popular hits by Lady GaGa, Katy Perry, Taylor Swift, Carly Rae Jepsen, and everyone else out there (just stay through the credits, the list of songs used lasts over a minute). It doesn’t matter if the human artist singles are sung by cute little animals; accompanied by predictable fart jokes, evidence proves why this movie aims squarely toward kids with an affinity of music over rules, offering the parents nothing more than a few scattered chuckles to at least manage without booing the artist offstage.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
TyranianApr 11, 2019
Sing has some mildly enjoyable bits and songs but is mediocre by any definition.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
spongeswiftMar 16, 2017
Sing is one of Illumination's best movies but it still feels retired and been there done that. American Idol Animal Edition is the best way to describe it. Many subplots all link to the fact that there's a singing competition. I think it's aSing is one of Illumination's best movies but it still feels retired and been there done that. American Idol Animal Edition is the best way to describe it. Many subplots all link to the fact that there's a singing competition. I think it's a little overload on the singing plot. It really blocked out many story elements that could've been great. Overall I think the movie is decent but it has many issues that tarnish it's good parts. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
badgerryan19May 19, 2017
Overall the film had enjoyable parts. The best part was definitely McConaughey. With talent like this in the movie it should of been great but we got a film that was okay. The music overall was good and it has some funny moments but they wereOverall the film had enjoyable parts. The best part was definitely McConaughey. With talent like this in the movie it should of been great but we got a film that was okay. The music overall was good and it has some funny moments but they were far in between. The performances are what keeps the movie afloat. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Muskrat147Jan 4, 2017
Rating - 5.9/10

With stellar animation and effective performances, Sing stands out among most of the years animated features--even if it lacks clever bits of emotion and 3-dimensional characters.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
DelWolfJul 3, 2017
You won't know this about me, but I have problems with Illumination. The fact that their main goal while producing movies is to make some sweet, sweet cash is insulting to me. I guess they don't make the absolute worst animated movies, likeYou won't know this about me, but I have problems with Illumination. The fact that their main goal while producing movies is to make some sweet, sweet cash is insulting to me. I guess they don't make the absolute worst animated movies, like 'Norm of the North'. Maybe the fact that my expectations were pretty low before watching this is the reason I found it semi-decent. Some of the songs I enjoyed. I mean, I was having a blast once Johnny was busting the keys for 'I'm Still Standing', but the final number was easily my least favourite. And I'm not a big 'Shake it off' fan either. However, I definitely enjoyed this more than 'The Secret Life of Pets', the animation is pretty good, and some of the characters are relatable, even if it feels like Illumination was trying to force some relatability with them. There's some talented voice actors in there, and it's funny enough, overall leading it to be a decent kill of 90 minutes. But I have many problems with this movie. Firstly, why are they animals? They could just as easily be people and the plot would not be different in any way. At least with Zootopia the plot was heavily dependant on the fact that they were all animals, but not here. I also found Buster Moon's financial problems uninteresting, and a lot of the character arks are predictable and mundane. It's also hard to flesh them out given the amount of them there are, with little to no character interaction. It's probably one of the best movies we've seen from this company, but let it be known that that is hardly an achievement. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
LeopoldTheBraveApr 2, 2017
I like this movie A LOT for some reason. I know it's only mediocre at best. But there's something that keeps making me come back to it. There's LOTS of positives, but a negative for each one.

For example, all the characters are very likable,
I like this movie A LOT for some reason. I know it's only mediocre at best. But there's something that keeps making me come back to it. There's LOTS of positives, but a negative for each one.

For example, all the characters are very likable, but because there are so many, we barely get to spend a lot of time with them.

The movie is paced very well at the start, letting us get to know all the characters we'll be seeing throughout the movie. But it falls a bit at the end when it focuses a bit too much on Meena, the most generic of the lovable cast as she just plays the role of "The shy girl."

The animation is fantastic. There's a wide variety in character design, and the environment looks great. You can really see yourself in the city or town where the movie takes place. But that's also a problem. While it's pretty, it has no creativity. You could replace all the animals with humans, and they could live in this world perfectly fine. While I do prefer this movie over Zootopia's overly forced message, predictability, and mediocre characters, they at least got the creativity in the animation correct.

Overall, I find Sing to be a very enjoyable movie, but I am aware of its flaws. I'd definitely recommend it over Secret Life of Pets, Zootopia, or any other talking animal movie that came out in 2016. (Except Kung fu Panda 3. Nothing beats that. Ever.) Without borrowing the plot of Toy Story like Secret Life of Pets, or a forced message that reminds you how sucky the world is for 100 minutes and makes you feel all melancholy like Zootopia, Sing is able to pull you into its happy world and distract you for a good bit. Not the kind of distraction that you'd sit your kids in front of to quiet them down for a while, but a good distraction that you'd enjoy watching with your kids to pass some time on a rainy day.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
Dragonfly44Nov 27, 2017
This movie had a lot of potential but the final product is more or less just boring. The cliched backstories for all of the characters made for nothing new and I lost all hope when they resorted to using potty humour.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
Gamzguy17Aug 21, 2021
It feels like a super-fast barrage of character introductions that, ultimately, defines them all as caricatures we have met time and time again instead of people we would like to be around with or establish a relationship with. The differenceIt feels like a super-fast barrage of character introductions that, ultimately, defines them all as caricatures we have met time and time again instead of people we would like to be around with or establish a relationship with. The difference here is that they are all pursuing singing careers. The plot is rather uninspired and predictable, much like the theater owner's (Buster Moon's) management mistakes that led to him starting a singing contest to get his theater re-established again in the first place. Overall, the film is perfectly "meh." It does the same old popular song and dance routines we have seen/heard time and time again. If you don't expect much from the movie industry, then you should totally dig this one. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
DunkaccinoJan 12, 2023
To his credit, Jennings directed this energetic picture with a sort of quick goofiness that fits well with the silly-looking characters and their silly voices.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews