Shortbus

THINKFilm | Release Date: October 4, 2006

7.3	USER SCORE Generally favorable reviews based on 90 Ratings

USER RATING DISTRIBUTION

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Watch Now

Stream On

Expand

Review this movie

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.

Check box if your review contains spoilers

0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User score By date Most helpful

AnonBOct 16, 2006

I must say, the computer animated shots of the New York landscape were most impressive. But I found the rest of the film quite dull. It kind of felt like a projection into the future, where all sex and nudity on screen is portrayed that way I must say, the computer animated shots of the New York landscape were most impressive. But I found the rest of the film quite dull. It kind of felt like a projection into the future, where all sex and nudity on screen is portrayed that way in all movies and there's nothing special about it anymore, and this would be just another indie dramedy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

StuartSOct 21, 2006

Some said this was a mature look at sex and not pornography. Yes, but it is a film about what most people would feel is perversion and deals in depth with homosexuality. Also, the plot-- well, I think there was one, but I couldn't find Some said this was a mature look at sex and not pornography. Yes, but it is a film about what most people would feel is perversion and deals in depth with homosexuality. Also, the plot-- well, I think there was one, but I couldn't find or follow it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

johnslegersJan 3, 2016

"Shortbus" is an interesting perspective on the loose sexual morals of the hip New York underground scene and shows us how these people apparently soothe their insecurities with lots of promiscuous sex, but I found it too distant from my own"Shortbus" is an interesting perspective on the loose sexual morals of the hip New York underground scene and shows us how these people apparently soothe their insecurities with lots of promiscuous sex, but I found it too distant from my own way of life, too shallow and too one-sided to really appeal to me. I liked the way it explored human weakness and the insecurities of the various characters felt all quite genuine, which is quite refreshing in an age where shallow pulp blockbusters make the majority of films available. However, the film didn't really go being that, it lacked balance in every possible way and wasn't nearly the genius art house film it tried to be, which left somewhat of a bitter aftertaste.

Even though one can see people talking about their private lives a lot, the character development still felt rushed. We get to understand people's insecurities regarding relationships and sexuality, but that's pretty much all we learn about them which makes it hard to really empathize with the characters. Also, besides the sex and relationship talk all we really get to see is people being naked and/or having sex, which gets quite monotonous near the end of the film and is too much in contrast with the emotional side of the rest of the film.

While we do get to see things from a lesbian perspective, a straight perspective and a gay male perspective, the gay male perspective is way too over-lighted and the lesbian side is only really touched in one scene. The heterosexual male's perspective is very under-lighted as well and even the heterosexual female's perspective does not get the amount of attention it should have gotten in spite of a straight female main character.

Similarly, the director shows us quite a lot gay males having sex, whereas the straight sex is very limited and very mild in comparison and there is no lesbian sex at all. Female genitals are not really shown, whereas male genitals are all over the place. Now, I have no problem with homosexual directors and them making a film from their own perspectives but he could have either made this a pure gay film ("Queer as Folk" style) or he could have given the heterosexual and lesbian side more screen time. This unbalanced mixture feels very awkward.

While the style of this film was most definitely refreshing and far from bad, it by no means comes close to the genius of Michel Gondry ("Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind", "Human Nature", "The Science of Sleep") or Sean Ellis ("Cashback") who also explored human sexuality and relationships in their films (although from a straight, generally male perspective). "Shortbus" didn't even come close to being as charming as "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind", as silly as "Human Nature" or as intense as "Cashback". Unlike the other films mentioned, "Shortbus" seemed to be more about sex than about love. Also unlike the other films mentioned, the audiovisual style of "Shortbus" felt not very innovative or unique after having seen quite a few art house films in my life. This made it come off as a bit pretentious.

If you're a homosexual male in conflict with your emotions, you may really like this film and consider it a very heartwarming experience, but for anyone else I'd recommend you go watch and of the other films I mentioned if you want to see an art house film about sex and relationships that's refreshing and different from anything you've seen before.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

BroyaxJul 2, 2019

Difficile de juger ce genre de film à la croisée des chemins de la comédie et de la pornographie... Mais apparemment, il est simplement qualifié d'érotique (?) alors que l'une de ses qualités réside... dans la qualité de ses quelques scènesDifficile de juger ce genre de film à la croisée des chemins de la comédie et de la pornographie... Mais apparemment, il est simplement qualifié d'érotique (?) alors que l'une de ses qualités réside... dans la qualité de ses quelques scènes pornograhiques. Appelons donc un chat, un chat et une chatte, une chatte. Et tout le reste viendra naturellement.

Donc, plutôt un bon porno en fait. Mais est-ce vraiment le cas ? car le réalisateur balance toutes ses cartouches au début et nous laisse sur la béquille à la fin, euh je veux dire sur notre faim, car le cul devient bien plus rare, quel dommage !

Le film se perd en effet dans le drame psychologique à la petite semaine avec ses homos dépressifs ainsi que son côté "peace and love" de bisounours progressiste. En même temps, toute la galerie des névropathes est illustrée ici avec le maso, le branleur, la sado, le voyeur, et la fille à voile et à vapeur mais toujours peine-à-jouir. Et tout ce petit monde se retrouve au "Shortbus", le bar à partouzes. Pour forniquer et mater. Et pérorer aussi.

Le côté comique est certes bien présent avec précisément la sexologue à la recherche de l'orgasme perdu... c'est quelque chose ! Un mélange bizarre, donc, de porno et de pathos, plus ou moins drôle... ou pathétique. Un peu court tout cela mais certainement audacieux.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

JLuis_001May 23, 2018

It's sex, passion, lust, a bit of love, unfulfilled desires and also female orgasm dysfunction. Nice topics but they feel misguided and hollow.
The film presents interconnected stories that never feel strong or at least just moreIt's sex, passion, lust, a bit of love, unfulfilled desires and also female orgasm dysfunction. Nice topics but they feel misguided and hollow.
The film presents interconnected stories that never feel strong or at least just more interesting.

I can say it was certainly unusual but very far from being truly thought-provoking… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

JeBjBoNov 13, 2022

The real Sex and the City. Oh, and this has one of the greatest opening sequences of all time.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews