Sherlock Holmes

8

ERG1008Sep 17, 2010

Guy Ritchie's interpretation of Conan-Doyle's famous sleuth with Black Magic, bare-knuckle boxing & general 19th Century japery.
Nice to see GR back on form in this action-adventure romp which has its clever twists & turns with a very strongGuy Ritchie's interpretation of Conan-Doyle's famous sleuth with Black Magic, bare-knuckle boxing & general 19th Century japery.
Nice to see GR back on form in this action-adventure romp which has its clever twists & turns with a very strong cast (even Jude Law is good!).
Took me a while to warm to RDJ's Holmes as he is very much a hyper-active thuggish brute but by the end I was won over.
The whole thing looks great too with Tower Bridge under construction, scaled down Piccadilly Circus & a great authenticity.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

RumblebeeloveJan 8, 2011

The backdrop and music are fantastic, while the actors really seem spot on. There is a unique sense of style and all the actors fit well. Camerawork and effects are great, but not too overwelming. I enjoyed the interesting touch editing.The backdrop and music are fantastic, while the actors really seem spot on. There is a unique sense of style and all the actors fit well. Camerawork and effects are great, but not too overwelming. I enjoyed the interesting touch editing. Robert Downey Jr. delivers, as well does Jude Law, though I would love to see Mark Strong being a hero one day. My only complaint is that I figured everything out before the end.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

MoviebuffreviewApr 6, 2011

The first time I saw this movie, I hadn't really read a lot of the Sherlock Holmes stories so I wasn't that familiar with the character. However, after becoming more familiar with the character, I really enjoy this movie. Thanks to some greatThe first time I saw this movie, I hadn't really read a lot of the Sherlock Holmes stories so I wasn't that familiar with the character. However, after becoming more familiar with the character, I really enjoy this movie. Thanks to some great performances, especially Robert Downey Jr., a script that is original while accurately recreating the characters, and some good humor, Sherlock Holmes is a movie worth seeing. A little cliche? Yes, but definitely good.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

MrCinnamonMay 29, 2011

This film has received much negative criticism from numerous sources. They say its too "thuggish", too "brutish" and that its a crude imitation of what sherlock holmes should be. Yet there is one thing niggling at me.
It seems that had it notThis film has received much negative criticism from numerous sources. They say its too "thuggish", too "brutish" and that its a crude imitation of what sherlock holmes should be. Yet there is one thing niggling at me.
It seems that had it not been called sherlock holmes, then the film would have received much better reviews. All these people have it in their heads that because it is holmes then it MUST be this or that.
To this I say, what a load of..... The film is very good. There is a fantastic balance of mystery, action and clever details. Some of which you may not notice at first. The acting throughout is superb, from all those involved. The plot and story development is well thought out and ends with a brilliantly executed scene which reveals all to the audience.
All round it was a very good film, well worth the money for a cinema ticket or DVD. Don't listen to these prejudiced fools who tell you it can't be good just because it isn't like the sherlock of old. This is an outstanding adaptation of the classic tales.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

jos95Jul 17, 2012

There isn't much of a mystery in this movie, but Sherlock Holmes mostly benefits from Robert Downey Jr's performance, and his pairing with Jude Law as Watson. Mark Strong gives chills as Blackwood and for what seems like the first time inThere isn't much of a mystery in this movie, but Sherlock Holmes mostly benefits from Robert Downey Jr's performance, and his pairing with Jude Law as Watson. Mark Strong gives chills as Blackwood and for what seems like the first time in movie history, the love interest gets cuts and bruises! One of many ways the movie avoids cliches. The action is also very imaginative and brilliantly realized. It's not your grandpa's version of Sherlock, but it's a great popcorn flick nonetheless.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

grandpajoe6191Sep 29, 2011

Guy Richie's "Sherlock Holmes" is a stupid interpretation where Sherlock Holmes is a muscle brute solving murders and mysteries with bullet time and sheer luck. Surprisingly, the movie actually works great with its modern interpretation of Holmes.

11 of 13 users found this helpful112

All this user's reviews

8

ZilcellMay 11, 2012

This is probably as good as a Shaerlock Holmes movie is going to get. Robert Downey continues to do great in this movie.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

oscarrDec 17, 2011

Sherlock Holmes was greatly acted, suspenseful picture with a great impersonation of Holmes. Robert Downey Jr. deserved best actor nomination.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

Compi24Nov 28, 2012

Featuring remarkably written characters and dialogue, Guy Ritchie's reimagining of the classic literary character proves to be one helluva fun ride.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

DibbHansenJul 18, 2013

An interesting film that is interesting to follow and visually is beautiful. And the music is inspiring as well (Hans Zimmer does fantastic here, as usual) However, the story is a bit hard to follow and Downey Jr. is a great actor and all,An interesting film that is interesting to follow and visually is beautiful. And the music is inspiring as well (Hans Zimmer does fantastic here, as usual) However, the story is a bit hard to follow and Downey Jr. is a great actor and all, but at times I struggle to hear what he is saying. The film has good action and a good ending, so overall I enjoyed the film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

bfoore90Jan 2, 2020

Robert Downey is brilliant, Jude Law is exceptional and Guy Ritchie's melding of 19th century mystery with modern day humor, action and dialogue is exceptional.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

BarneyOnMTJan 5, 2016

WHAT I LIKED: This film shines out as a historic crime film thanks to it's character portrayals and quirky yet gritty style. Robert Downey Jr gives one of the best performances of his career, making the character his own and building one ofWHAT I LIKED: This film shines out as a historic crime film thanks to it's character portrayals and quirky yet gritty style. Robert Downey Jr gives one of the best performances of his career, making the character his own and building one of the best portrayals of any character in a long time. Yet the entire cast are excellent, aided by some truly authentic, timely world building and a smart, witty script. Not to mention the brilliant action where Guy Ritchie's amazing cinematography and the scoring comes into play. This is one of those quirky films that just clicks.
WHAT I DIDN'T LIKE: Overall, it's a ball of fun, but could be shorter, and the plot is a bit confusing, and it's not true to the 'original source material,' (but then that isn't really the idea here.)
VERDICT: A quirky film from Ritchie that just clicks, that's largely thanks to the convincing cast.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

FuturedirectorMar 13, 2016

Thanks to Robert Dwoney Jr. and Jude Law's surprisingly effective chemistry and an impressively entertaining storytelling, Sherlock Holmes isn't only one of the smartest works added to Ritchie's filmography; it also offers a great spectacleThanks to Robert Dwoney Jr. and Jude Law's surprisingly effective chemistry and an impressively entertaining storytelling, Sherlock Holmes isn't only one of the smartest works added to Ritchie's filmography; it also offers a great spectacle to the audience.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

CoreGamer1408Aug 1, 2023

At it's heart a fun buddy movie that actions up Sherlock Holmes. Who is normally seen as a more cerebral character. Facing off against a menacing and clever foe. Watson is very much the equal in his own way in this dynamic duo.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

annbdDec 31, 2019

Can’t believe that low scores. It was both entertaining and visually satisfying.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

merijnjFeb 21, 2018

(77/100)
Very entertaining to watch. This was my first Holmes movie and I liked the character ever since.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

ryu9376Feb 1, 2019

Just a fantastic film done by two great actors... have been a RDJ fan for years now.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

jonslowJan 7, 2019

Excellent movie, entertaining and fun. Great action. Holmes and Watson compliment each other nicely.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Donut_AddictMar 8, 2019

If you come into this film expecting a 1/1 retelling of Sherlock Holmes' tales and mysteries well you will be disappointed.

What I was not disappointed with was the stylistic choices and talent presented with us. The fight scenes feel fast,If you come into this film expecting a 1/1 retelling of Sherlock Holmes' tales and mysteries well you will be disappointed.

What I was not disappointed with was the stylistic choices and talent presented with us. The fight scenes feel fast, fluid, and more real. The character's are enjoyable and have great chemistry, but that all is behind one of the best settings I've seen. We see industrialization in its complete here with warehouses, ships being built, and we link it all together in the main plot. Every scene and view in this film is a treat. I'd almost dare to call it a steampunk film, but I'm not ready to fight that battle yet.

This film has its own style that we don't see in cinema today. I saw this film on release night and I can safely say this film still holds up well.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Bleeding_JesterNov 20, 2021

this movie is great and its an amazing adaption of some of the most well known books ever written

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

liamexeSep 25, 2022

The second thing I liked was pre-planning the execution of the fights all in imagination at once. It was all shown in slow motion. It was tremendous and mesmerizing. The second thing I liked was pre-planning how the bouts would go down in myThe second thing I liked was pre-planning the execution of the fights all in imagination at once. It was all shown in slow motion. It was tremendous and mesmerizing. The second thing I liked was pre-planning how the bouts would go down in my head all at once. All of it was displayed in slow motion. It was amazing and captivating. I also enjoyed the cinematography, which was the third thing. It was flawless. Sometimes I think it primarily depends on the budget.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

mlJan 10, 2010

Very hard to rate, but I'll bump it because the average is too low. The plot is stupid, the hand-to-hand combat is dubious, it's no more a Sherlock Holmes movie than it is a mystery (closer to a spy movie) and the use of drugs and Very hard to rate, but I'll bump it because the average is too low. The plot is stupid, the hand-to-hand combat is dubious, it's no more a Sherlock Holmes movie than it is a mystery (closer to a spy movie) and the use of drugs and technology is a massive copout destroying all sense of crime-solving deduction. Yet Holmes and Watson are just so *funny.* They carry the movie away from total oblivion and make in entertaining for at least another viewing. Meanwhile their domestic, awkward relationship sets off the homoeroticism alarms of reviewers everywhere. Arthur Conan Doyle's work was always somewhat pulpy. Perhaps this is really a fitting (if entirely faithless) modern reboot.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

JonlunDFeb 7, 2010

Very good but felt a little long by 3/4 of the way through.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

OstafJan 3, 2010

It wasn't amazing but I did like how he was a drug addict thug rather then the mystery solving uptight guy people usually think of. He was the original Holmes.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

A.C.Jan 3, 2010

It's nice to read the User coments, honestly, I hate everybody hwo makes a critic, there are so many different comments, from "This sh*t sucked" to "Masterpiece". The Users here aren't giving a critic, they are just saying if the It's nice to read the User coments, honestly, I hate everybody hwo makes a critic, there are so many different comments, from "This sh*t sucked" to "Masterpiece". The Users here aren't giving a critic, they are just saying if the movie liked them or not. A lot of people think they can give a mature coment but no, like this guy John W., what a dumbass, what does he know about writing or acting?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

BillyS.Feb 6, 2010

If you go in to a movie with low expectations, you'll more than likely be surpized. As was the case for Sherlock Holmes. Don't get me wrong, Guy Ritchie taking on a literary masterpiece is no way the same as Kubrick and The If you go in to a movie with low expectations, you'll more than likely be surpized. As was the case for Sherlock Holmes. Don't get me wrong, Guy Ritchie taking on a literary masterpiece is no way the same as Kubrick and The Shining, but Ritchie has incorporated Holmes' intelligence with his usual over the top action pieces and made a much better-than-expected entertaining film. Downey and Law play Holmes and Watson with humor and a little gay innuendo, but the way Ritchie has Holmes analyse his fights in slow motion first is a great advantage to all the commotion that follows. All in all, well worth the price of admission.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

7

KatieBDec 30, 2009

I generally like Guy Ritchie movies. I generally love all the lead actors, especially RDJ. Chemistry between all the actors was palpable and believable. I agree with other reviewers who said the story line was just not good enough. The I generally like Guy Ritchie movies. I generally love all the lead actors, especially RDJ. Chemistry between all the actors was palpable and believable. I agree with other reviewers who said the story line was just not good enough. The acting, bantering dialogue, well-created relationships, scenery, costuming, music - all merit high scores. Story and plot, not so much. Unfortunately. I would see it again, however. Just for RDJ boxing, sans shirt. Seriously, it was very enjoyable. Hope the sequel has a better story line!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

SusanSJan 18, 2010

Really, like a 6.7; a silly, light-headed prologue to what could be a more intriguing sequel once Prof. Moriarty reveals himself. One thing the film has going for it, though--the much discussed chemistry between Holmes and Watson, which all Really, like a 6.7; a silly, light-headed prologue to what could be a more intriguing sequel once Prof. Moriarty reveals himself. One thing the film has going for it, though--the much discussed chemistry between Holmes and Watson, which all involved, including Rachel McAdams, seem to be reveling in. McAdams plays a sporting beard, understanding that Irene Adler is to be witty, cunning, pretty (but not too pretty), and not to get in the way of her two pretty male costars, whose seem to be barely containing their laughter at their characters' suppressed Victorian passion for each other. There is a ambiguously evil plot; Mark Strong does well at an ambiguously evil Lord Blackwell, and Hans Matheson (from The Tudors) actually manages to put some enthusiasm into the whole scheme. Overall, a fun two-plus hours, with some great verbal banter and random action sequences. A fun diversion; let's see if Ritchie can come up with an actual mystery next time.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

HunterLApr 11, 2010

An interesting mystery, yet surprisingly predictable due to Sherlock's logical world, worth a rent but not recommended to buy.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

SeanC.Dec 26, 2009

Typically I agree with the critics. For the most part, they seem to get it right, avoiding Hollywood cliche and giving plaudits to films who try to be above the fray. However, this December I am completely confused. No this was not the best Typically I agree with the critics. For the most part, they seem to get it right, avoiding Hollywood cliche and giving plaudits to films who try to be above the fray. However, this December I am completely confused. No this was not the best film of the year, and at times reverted to traditional action film archetypes, but it was certainly worth watching. Terrific acting, clever writing, and a macabre take (and perhaps more accurate to the written stories) on what has otherwise become a cartoonish and comical Sherlock Holmes franchise. I would compare this to the "Batman Begins" of an otherwise irrelevant and outdated character. Two thumbs up, especially in light of movies like Avatar which are completely overproduced and over praised.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

IvanT.Dec 29, 2009

As anyone could tell from the previews, Doyle's Holmes is only a distant ancestor of this portrayal of the London detective. A fun film that is intended to mesmerize the audience with a steady stream of witty dialogue, clever mystery, As anyone could tell from the previews, Doyle's Holmes is only a distant ancestor of this portrayal of the London detective. A fun film that is intended to mesmerize the audience with a steady stream of witty dialogue, clever mystery, and thrilling action. Small wonder the critics don't approve. As blockbusters go, this one's worth its weight. Best viewed in the cinema, once.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

CiaranH.Dec 29, 2009

Over the years there have been countless adaptations of Sir Arthut Conan Doyle's series of books revolving aroudn the man with the most brilliant mind in the world, Sherlock Holmes. In fact, there have been so many adaptations from so Over the years there have been countless adaptations of Sir Arthut Conan Doyle's series of books revolving aroudn the man with the most brilliant mind in the world, Sherlock Holmes. In fact, there have been so many adaptations from so many different medias that it takes a very good film to stick out from the Sherlock Holmes crowd. Robert Downey Jr. (Holmes) brings his own unique style to the character. He shows previously unseen side of Holmes, he makes the character his own, much like Daniel Craig did in the recent James Bond films. Although the plot is developed very slowly throughout the course of the film (which is definitely overlong), Guy Ritchie manages to keep us hooked through dramatic fights and a clever, witty script. In conclusion, if you want to see another boring and repetitive adaption of Sherlock Holmes do not go and see this film, if however if you want to see a unique and brilliant take on the story do come and see this thrilling film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

FionaB.Dec 31, 2009

Great cast, intelligent and witty script. Guy Ritchie at his very best!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

BryanKDec 30, 2009

Ever since Arthur Doyle wrote the original novel adventures of Sherlock Holmes, their have been a variety of film versions of the stories. Now at the end of this year, a new film version arrives to bring this character into twenty-first Ever since Arthur Doyle wrote the original novel adventures of Sherlock Holmes, their have been a variety of film versions of the stories. Now at the end of this year, a new film version arrives to bring this character into twenty-first century. The film adaptation has a mixed result in its execution and concept. Without revealing the plot, it is implied as a supernatural Sherlock Holmes story, which feels more it should be titled, "Sherlock Holmes meets the Devil rides out". At first, the plot moves at a rapid pace, but slows down by the thirty minute mark. In the title character is Robert Downey Jr who leads the film very well. His take on the character is a more sarcastic and tongue in cheek version with only a decent amount of seriousness. Jude Law is pretty good as Watson and is the serious man between the two appearing a complete commanding actor. As for Rachel McAdams, she has her moments and then she does not. While she does well in her role as Holmes' "female companion", her American voice sounds somewhat out of place in Victorian England. The film's colouring is another aspect which needs to be discussed. The film is shot in a monotone colour scheme in which browns and dark greys appear with the only truly vibrant color being the red in McAdams' dress. However their are problems with the film's structure. At the conclusion, in what could be an open and darker ending, the film seems to go on a little too long and leaves open the idea of a followup. Overall a pretty well done film, but not without its faults. Anyway, Happy New Year to everyone at Metacritic.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

TArkoBDec 26, 2009

Would've been a nine if Downey woudn't have mumbled his way through the film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

WilliamC.Dec 27, 2009

Sherlock Holmes: A Mystery to Solved As the Christmas festivities come to a close, other opportunities open up in the world of theatrical entertainment, with the release of Sherlock Homes starring Robert Downy Jr., Jude Law, and Rachel Sherlock Holmes: A Mystery to Solved As the Christmas festivities come to a close, other opportunities open up in the world of theatrical entertainment, with the release of Sherlock Homes starring Robert Downy Jr., Jude Law, and Rachel McAdams. Yet with this installment of Holmes, after so many before have been a delightful and true emersion into the pages of creator Arthur Conan Doyle, has become like so many movies of this generation; an action thriller full of explosions and special effects. The plot takes us out of the original stories, and into a time where Holmes (Downy) has become despondent from a lack of cases, after solving his latest one in the opening of the movie. Watson (Law) is preparing to move out of 221B Baker Street to consider marriage. Although this is obviously putting strain on the dynamic duo… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

C1G4N0Sep 8, 2010

Nice action movie. Good performances and directing. Entertaining but I can understand the negative critic scores, after all it is a movie about Sherlock Holmes and this is definitely not the Sherlock Holmes we are used to.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

MovieLonely94Nov 2, 2010

this movie has been led to perfect performances from Robert Downey Jr and Jude Law.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

FlapjackOct 22, 2010

Why this film is getting the bad reviews I've seen is beyond me. Great actors, great scenes, good direction and a pretty good story. What the hell is wrong with you people? /rant.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

JonnyFendiJan 20, 2011

Before thiz newest version, there are about 200 movies that brought Sherlock into wide-screen and more than 70 Actors played as thiz famous character. Sherlock Holmes is a well-known detective on Sir Arthur Conan Doyle novels (Which firstBefore thiz newest version, there are about 200 movies that brought Sherlock into wide-screen and more than 70 Actors played as thiz famous character. Sherlock Holmes is a well-known detective on Sir Arthur Conan Doyle novels (Which first time published on 1887). Sherlock on thiz movie is Robert -Iron Man- Downey Jr., Accompanied by his fellow side-kick Dr. John Watson (played by Jude Law). The Other Casts are Rachel McAdams and Mark Strong. Downey Jr. seem does not care how to perform Sherlock authentically, otherwise he just act with his style and just have fun on his version of Sherlock. As we knew, Sherlock is discreet, calm, and charismatic person. But in the end, I think viewers also agree to put beside the original Sherlock for a while, bcoz thiz version is enjoyable. In the overall, The movie was very good enough and very funny with a good fresh concept. The Director is Guy Ritchie. Ritchie known as Indie-Director, which is his best works are LOCK, STOCK, AND TWO SMOKING BARRELS (1998) and SNATCH (2000). The plots in thiz movie is excited on the beginning, a little lame on the middle of film, and closed with just customary ending. After watching thiz movie, maybe its cross on our mind, Downey Jr. on his version of Sherlock resembles with Will Smith performance on WILD WILD WEST (1999). But we must to admit that thiz movie have some plus poins compare with Smith WILD WILD WEST. Both of the movies show us a new style on the legendary figures. Here he comes, The Funky Sherlock!

Visit My Blog on JONNY'S MOVEE on : http://jonnyfendi.blogspot.com… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

codfather96Aug 19, 2011

Ritchie puts his own spin on the Sherlock story making him much more of a street smart detective and more of a oddball to society than god like genius. The story is a little bit complicated and losses steam but the performance from Downey isRitchie puts his own spin on the Sherlock story making him much more of a street smart detective and more of a oddball to society than god like genius. The story is a little bit complicated and losses steam but the performance from Downey is great, Jude Law is good and really grounds the movie as Watson and even though the supporting cast is forgettable they are made up for with fantastic slow motion run through of how Sherlock will dispatch his enemies, which is great as normally in action movies they just beat the crap out of their enemies but in this Sherlock narrates how he will beat them up and gives us the various injures they will sustain. I is a decent film but not having a great story in a Sherlock Holmes film is kind of stupid.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

MediaCriticOct 16, 2011

A good movie but nothing spectacular. The set was great and the story-line worked well. There is some funny moments in it as well, along with the serious scenes of the film. The actors played their parts well and the fighting and actionA good movie but nothing spectacular. The set was great and the story-line worked well. There is some funny moments in it as well, along with the serious scenes of the film. The actors played their parts well and the fighting and action scenes were choreographed well. Based in London a long time ago, Sherlock Holmes and his partner have to investigate a mystery where is seems someone has came back from the dead. It's a good movie and worth a watch.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

LandFApr 19, 2012

Hmmmm. There are action sequences, plenty of one liners, and Robert Downey Jr. I can only deduce that this is another Hollywood box office smash. And silly old me, I just saw the film. My friends pestered me about this for the longest time.Hmmmm. There are action sequences, plenty of one liners, and Robert Downey Jr. I can only deduce that this is another Hollywood box office smash. And silly old me, I just saw the film. My friends pestered me about this for the longest time. They loved the film, and were positive I would too. I told them I'd get around to it, until finally one of my friends lent me the movie to watch. My feelings about this unique film are a little mixed. The film wants to be clever, but very little smarts at all are needed to view this film. Naturally, this film is geared towards teenage boys, who for the most part, are not interested in an intellectually stimulating film. They just want to see Downey deliver witty lines, and watch him beat up thugs. So, if that's what you came to see, you will not be disappointed. However those wanting a more intelligent film, should not look here. Even when the Sherlock Holmes is explaining how he figured out the case at the end, it's through many clues that the viewer didn't have a chance of deciphering themselves, which is quite contradictory to what Sherlock Holmes is all about. I know the target audience, so I expected as much, but my mother who viewed the film with me, was quite irritated at the obscure clues. A good mystery should be tailored so that the audience can try to solve the mystery too (and make it hard enough, so that they can't figure it out). This film does nothing of the sort, instead, we merely learn at the end, that Sherlock had seen things that the camera never shows us, making it impossible to solve the mystery ourselves. But like I said, the target audience doesn't care about such things, so therefore, the film is oddly "smartless." But I digress. On the other hand, the cast does a fantastic job at portraying each of their characters, even if some lines were delivered a little hammy. Also, the musical score, composed by Hanz Zimmer, is very good, and absolutely hilarious. Music doesn't commonly make me smile (out of humor anyway), but this score did. Though many of the action sequences were rather ordinary, there were definitely a handful that kept me on the edge of my seat, and I'm sure the target audience will eat it up. The film is quite amusing, as one can expect with from the leading actor, but for some reason, the film wasn't quite as humorous as I was expecting. It was funny enough, anyway. Lastly, and this may be a major problem for some, but this film just doesn't feel like Sherlock Holmes. It feels like Robert Downey Jr. makes another million dollars. I suppose this is to be expected, but somehow, I was hoping that there might be some sort of Sherlock spirit to this, but alas, there was not. I was not wowed, but I most definitely enjoyed myself. I do wish, though, that the film was a bit more intelligent, and this film doesn't feel like Sherlock Holmes at all. Regardless, this is an enjoyable romp, and I'll probably catch the sequel on DVD. Consider me entertained, but not impressed.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

Critic2012May 4, 2012

Sherlock Holmes is known as the brilliant detective of 221B Baker Street, who can spot minute details in the blink of an eye and observe even the smallest and insignificant things and regard them as important. Here in this film we get a moreSherlock Holmes is known as the brilliant detective of 221B Baker Street, who can spot minute details in the blink of an eye and observe even the smallest and insignificant things and regard them as important. Here in this film we get a more rambunctious, drugged and physical man with the same intellect and persona we'd expect. An excellent film.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

OfficialMar 8, 2014

A fantastic performance from Robert Downey Jr., who was perfect to play Sherlock Holmes. We have an excellent cast, an intelligent story and script, and overall resembles a recommended film for all who enjoy mysteries.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

SpangleJan 3, 2015

Overall, Sherlock Holmes is simply a very fun little film. Robert Downey Jr, Jude Law, Rachel McAdams, and Mark Strong, are all excellent and the case presented to Holmes is very compelling. I really like the explanation of what went down atOverall, Sherlock Holmes is simply a very fun little film. Robert Downey Jr, Jude Law, Rachel McAdams, and Mark Strong, are all excellent and the case presented to Holmes is very compelling. I really like the explanation of what went down at the end, really was nice to see all of the elements of the film come together like that. The film was also really well shot and the story was told nicely, so kudos to the cinematographer and director Guy Ritchie for those things, respectively. The slowed down effect used on a couple of occasions was also incredibly cool and well down, though I don't really think those particular scenes were needed, but I certainly appreciated the craft there. There are a few other elements I didn't really think this one needed, but overall, it was a very enjoyable and well made film that serves as good entertainment for two hours. Sure, it's no Citizen Kane, but not every film has to be.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

killian13Jul 7, 2013

this new adaptation of Sherlock Holmes is very well directed .
Guy Ritchie has mixed the old adaptation and a new who is a bit modern
all the cast play very well
good job Guy

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Voodoo123May 10, 2022

Triple AAA blockbuster action adventure punches above its weight with style and incredibly strong casting. Very entertaining!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

CineAutoctonoDec 5, 2015

Sherlock Holmes is an interesting little boring movie , but , and more when in the presence of Mr. actor Robert Downey, Jr. , who put the character , a little sympathy and eccentricity.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

eva3si0nJun 18, 2017

This's good film about great detective Holmes. Yes, film realise earlier series Sherlock from BBC, but action happens in the 19th century and it cool. Plot is easy and rectilinear, acting of actors is excellent. The only shortcoming -This's good film about great detective Holmes. Yes, film realise earlier series Sherlock from BBC, but action happens in the 19th century and it cool. Plot is easy and rectilinear, acting of actors is excellent. The only shortcoming - Moriarty is absent.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

FilipeNetoMar 31, 2020

In this film, Sherlock Holmes and his adventure companion Dr. Watson, face the threat of a occult master who has been executed for several murders but, mysteriously, comes back to life. I confess that I am not a particular Sherlock HolmesIn this film, Sherlock Holmes and his adventure companion Dr. Watson, face the threat of a occult master who has been executed for several murders but, mysteriously, comes back to life. I confess that I am not a particular Sherlock Holmes fan. I read Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's tales and stories and found them interesting, but I always preferred other authors. However, I decided to watch this film and give it a chance, since it is a character that is rarely seen in cinema.

I have to confess that the famous series "The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes", from the mid-eighties, marked my way of imagining the characters. In this series, Jeremy Brett brought the detective to life in a way that, I think, is the closest to the author's original conception, and the most in line with the Victorian gentleman. This film, however, shows us a very modern Sherlock Holmes in his way of acting, speaking and behaving. The character acts like someone of our time, in a dissonant historical period, creating an anachronism. However, surprisingly, it did not affect me. I'm not a fan of anachronisms and I often criticize period films because of that, but the way this film was conceived made it acceptable.

In fact, this film is not an adaptation of any of the original books or tales, it just take advantage of the characters and creates a new story with some adventure, action and even a supernatural scent much to the Victorian taste. If this film were an adaptation of any of Conan Doyle's stories, I think the director - an unlikely Guy Ritchie - would not have that freedom.

Guy Ritchie would never be my first choice to direct a film like this. Against all my expectations, he proved to be more skilled and intelligent than in any of his other works (at least, those I know). I appreciated some of his options, like the dissonance between the period and the characters' attitudes or the use of slow motion sometimes. However, the film relies heavily on the quality and performance of the two main actors. Robert Downey Jr. is in the best moment of his career and it was a safe bet to bring a bold Holmes to life, closer to an action figure with a hint of mad genius than to a pure intellectual who analyses facts coldly. Jude Law, who brought Dr. Watson to life, is just as good and both are excellent when working together. Law's Watson, by the way, remains, as it always has been, more conventional and cautious than its companion, making a pleasant counterpoint to the main character. In the supporting cast, Mark Strong is a charismatic villain and Rachel McAdams gives additional support when its needed, but it has been largely underused.

Technically, it is a film that uses and abuses CGI, green screen, visual and sound effects of quite regular quality, without anything extraordinary. It is something common in a film designed to be a blockbuster. The action and fight scenes were well done but they are not breathtaking. The cinematography tried to be darker, perhaps as a result of our idea of Victorian London as a misty and humid city. This worked fine most of the time but there are moments when it was too much. Post-production and editing was regular and the soundtrack, by Hans Zimmer, was not as successful as many others by the same composer. At least to me, it sounded too much like a sailors song.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

ErikTheCriticOct 14, 2018

A great performance from Robert Downey Jr., who was perfect to play Sherlock Holmes. I liked the cast, I liked the intrigue, but the villain was unfortunately rather generic.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

JJ2FAS4UDec 30, 2021

----------------------------------7.4/10-----------------------------------

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

zekeb.Jan 1, 2010

Better than the last Indiana Jones, not as good as most Indy action thrillers, same sort of crazy ass plot. Annoying ending, middling muddled middle, good beginning. Ii will make Madonna jealous.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

RickAJan 8, 2010

Pretty good movie. I would recommend seeing it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

CarolynM.Jan 4, 2010

Gorgeous to look at, and great performances by Downey and Law, but an eminently forgettable plot: I won't need to see this twice.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

6

marlac.Jan 8, 2010

I love Robert Downey but he never once said "elementary my dear Watson".

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

FrankO.Dec 28, 2009

I enjoyed this movie but it felt very long. The chase scenes and the beginning set-up were too long. I liked the interaction and relationship between Holmes and Watson. Was this suppose to be an action/adventure story or a mystery? It did I enjoyed this movie but it felt very long. The chase scenes and the beginning set-up were too long. I liked the interaction and relationship between Holmes and Watson. Was this suppose to be an action/adventure story or a mystery? It did not do justice to either.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

AaronGDec 26, 2009

It's kind of a hard movie to like. I mean, the cast and acting is great, and the script is never really bad, but at the same time nothing that happens makes you go "OH MY GOD I HAVE TO SEE THAT AGAIN". The story is a bit hard to follow It's kind of a hard movie to like. I mean, the cast and acting is great, and the script is never really bad, but at the same time nothing that happens makes you go "OH MY GOD I HAVE TO SEE THAT AGAIN". The story is a bit hard to follow and the way Sherlock figures things out are kind of silly. There's huge potential for Guy Ritchie to make a franchise off this movie, and I think I might like that. But one thing I've GOT to say, this is a beautifully made movie. All the sets and costumes, even the scenery, matches the mood of the plot perfectly. The grey-blue color scheme adds to the mood instead of taking away from it like some other films (coughtwilightcough). It wasn't a bad movie at all, but I can understand why some won't like it. If you're interested in seeing this, go ahead and watch it, you'll enjoy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

BairdoSep 22, 2010

Holmes works out and is sort of American, and Watson is young and not fat? Gotcha. Better keep Guy Richie away from the franchises that actually hinge on obesity.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

LondonTrueloveNov 11, 2010

Ehhh, not nearly what I expected. I'm a huge fan of Robert Downey Jr. and an even bigger one of Guy Ritchie, so naturally when I heard this film was being made I got excited. Not at all lived up to the anticipation. Watch if you like, butEhhh, not nearly what I expected. I'm a huge fan of Robert Downey Jr. and an even bigger one of Guy Ritchie, so naturally when I heard this film was being made I got excited. Not at all lived up to the anticipation. Watch if you like, but you're not missing anything if you don't.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

EmuChickenMay 14, 2011

So I rented this one, expecting it to be like an old crime whodonnit thing - and was kinda surprised. Never knew the Holmes / Watson combination were like Batman and Robin!?!
... Come to think of it, this IS Batman in the 19th century! (orSo I rented this one, expecting it to be like an old crime whodonnit thing - and was kinda surprised. Never knew the Holmes / Watson combination were like Batman and Robin!?!
... Come to think of it, this IS Batman in the 19th century! (or was it early 20th century!?)
The plot was far too difficult for my wife to understand, - was similar to "Da Vinci Code" but added a "bit" of reality to the ending (still I understood, wife, not a clue)
As it got to around an hour in, it felt like the story was dragging a little longer than it needed.
As a rundown, Batman (the new style) + Da Vinci Code = Sherlock Holmes. .. who'd have guessed!?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

rotkuJan 15, 2012

Brilliant acting from Downey Jr raises this movie from middle of the road to a good film. Some good camera work adds to the fight scene although at times it feels a bit like a Victorian CSI episode.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

avatar16Dec 17, 2011

Trop attachÃ© Ã l'image qu'on lui donnait dans les films prÃ©cÃ©dents, il m'a Ã©tÃ© difficile d'accorder le moindre intÃ©rÃªt Ã ceTrop attachÃ© Ã l'image qu'on lui donnait dans les films prÃ©cÃ©dents, il m'a Ã©tÃ© difficile d'accorder le moindre intÃ©rÃªt Ã ce Sherlock Holmes version 2010. Et franchement, s'il n'avait pas quelques atouts en poche, je resterais sur ma dÃ©cision. A commencer par son allure de blockbuster et sa mise en scÃ¨ne (ralentis, certains cadrages) parfaitement inutile, sans parler de l'ambiance un brin agaÃ§ante (Hans Zimmer n'est pas le meilleur Ã chaque fois). Mais je dois reconnaÃ®tre que l'ensemble est largement sauvÃ© par l'interprÃ©tation et par le scÃ©nario, vÃ©ritable enquÃªte policiÃ¨re qui rend le film divertissant et intrigant. Car voilÃ les seuls qualificatifs que je donnerais pour juger ce Sherlock Holmes : un blockbuster plutÃ´t sympathique, mais pas aussi exceptionnel de ce qui se faisait entendre.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

TyranianApr 13, 2019

Ritchie's take on Sherlock has great music, action and Mark Strong but you may tire of Downey and Law before the end.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Tall_But_ShortJul 29, 2012

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The first half of Sherlock Holmes was boring, the second half was much better, and then the ending was just dumb. I'm not saying it was a bad film, it just wasn't Sherlock Holmes. The ending when Blackwood comes out of nowhere and pushes Sherlock's "girlfriend" off the bridge was so dumb that I really started laughing. It was just silly, but even this movie isn't great, it can still be mildly entertaining with some clever moments with Robert Downey Jr. and Jude Law.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

dev92Aug 25, 2012

The film was fine but I genuinely think that it would have been better off without Rachel McAdams. Nothing against the lady but her character just seemed to be put in there to incorporate a female lead. The story itself is rather good and IThe film was fine but I genuinely think that it would have been better off without Rachel McAdams. Nothing against the lady but her character just seemed to be put in there to incorporate a female lead. The story itself is rather good and I thought that Jude Law in particular was great.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

KernJan 23, 2013

I give it a 6 because I genuinely enjoyed the movie, the actors and the scenarios; it's a good little unassuming action flick. On the other hand, I can't give more than 6 because it was advertised as Sherlock Holmes and it's not Holmes. ToI give it a 6 because I genuinely enjoyed the movie, the actors and the scenarios; it's a good little unassuming action flick. On the other hand, I can't give more than 6 because it was advertised as Sherlock Holmes and it's not Holmes. To those people who didn't like the movie on account of it not being a Holmes film, erase the title from your mind and start thinking about the character as Johnny McAwesomeville, and you'll find yourselves enjoying it too; it worked for me.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

LivingTribunalMay 30, 2019

The whole Lord Blackwood thing was so annoying but Holmes and Watson, they are the way. Also, I got goosebumps when Mary said "Whatever it takes"

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

H1pPoJun 10, 2021

There is something missing in this Sherlock Holmes, perhaps charisma, and, as we know, Robert Downey Jr., that is enough. Predictable.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

ChadSDec 26, 2009

Do Sherlock Holmes purists exist? When James Bond was revamped for Martin Campbell's "Casino Royale", people were taken aback by Daniel Craig's hooligan interpretation of the 007 agent, because the long-running series never went Do Sherlock Holmes purists exist? When James Bond was revamped for Martin Campbell's "Casino Royale", people were taken aback by Daniel Craig's hooligan interpretation of the 007 agent, because the long-running series never went away. Many missed the gentleman Bond, even George Lazenby. On the other hand, the Scotland Yard detective(created by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle) has not graced the big screen since Barry Levinson's "Young Sherlock Holmes", almost twenty-five years ago. Does anybody miss the non-boxing Holmes? Probably not. In effect, the filmmaker has carte blanche on remaking this pop culture figure(who hasn't been popular since the Seattle music scene was headed by The Young Fresh Fellows), and as a result, he turned Holmes and Dr. Watson into "Perfect Strangers"(the ABC sitcom from the late-eighties, starring Pierce Brosnan and Mark Linn-Baker), two heterosexual males with man crushes on each other. Although there is nothing in "Sherlock Holmes" that resembles a "Brokeback England", curiously(curious because Holmes' squeeze is the squeezable Rachel McAdams), neither man gets hot and heavy with their readily available women. It's a buddy movie: pure testosterone, an action film with a "Scooby-Doo" mentality, in which Holmes goes about debunking the existence of a supernatural realm. Almost as an afterthought, "Sherlock Holmes" does indeed find time to show the detective not being an action hero, but his sleuthing powers somehow seems diminished by the scale of the production. The powers of his brain is subordinate to the special effects.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

RNJan 1, 2010

The movie is at it's very best only ok. Although it portrays a very likable cast of characters and the leads give off a great performance, the story is lacking. It shows almost too much predictablity and as for fans of the Doyle's The movie is at it's very best only ok. Although it portrays a very likable cast of characters and the leads give off a great performance, the story is lacking. It shows almost too much predictablity and as for fans of the Doyle's original works... well if they really liked the originals they'll find themselves disapointed. However for the rest of us whom aren't harsh critics or hard headed fan boys, the movie worth watching once or twice.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

SandyJan 23, 2010

Pants. Oh, alright then, if I must say more... Unbearable fake English accent from Downey ( like DvDyke's cocker-nee chimney sweep) grates throughout. No chemistry with Jude Law (who, IMO, has no chemistry in anything I've seen him Pants. Oh, alright then, if I must say more... Unbearable fake English accent from Downey ( like DvDyke's cocker-nee chimney sweep) grates throughout. No chemistry with Jude Law (who, IMO, has no chemistry in anything I've seen him in on his own, never mind with others). Typical Ritchie cockney geezers, silly plot, slo-mo fights (Sooo overdone these days). One decent gag - the fight on the slipway - and one decent actor - Mark Strong - but limp climax. 5 is generous!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

DanBJan 26, 2010

Entertaining, but basically a Victorian period carbon copy of every plot most of uf have seen time and time again.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

kgmJan 30, 2010

This certainly isn

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

MatthewWApr 29, 2010

Let me begin by saying that "Sherlock Holmes" is a lot of fun. That said, as a movie about Sherlock Holmes, it is a failure. As a lifelong fan of the stories by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, I have seen many screen adaptations and interpretations Let me begin by saying that "Sherlock Holmes" is a lot of fun. That said, as a movie about Sherlock Holmes, it is a failure. As a lifelong fan of the stories by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, I have seen many screen adaptations and interpretations of his most enduring creation, and this movie simply fails to do the subject matter any kind of justice. While billed, somewhat schizophrenically, as both a "return to origin" and "reinterpretation", the film definitely inclines to the latter. A romance is added, as is an emphasis on chop-socky action and physical comedy. The joy of the Holmes stories, and of all his best films, is the unraveling of the mystery. Here the mystery takes a back seat, serving as a vehicle to propel the film from one frenetic action sequence to another. The fights are kinetic and exciting, but ultimately many of them seem included for their own sake, not the sake of the story. This is truly a Sherlock Holmes for the MTV generation. Between the whizz-bang fights, some plot sometimes occurs. There is not very much, however, and what is there is underwhelming. Mark Strong is given little to do as the main villian, and his nefarious scheme does not hold up to close scrutiny. Rachel McAdams plays a totally reimagined Irene Adler, who is now a master criminal and Sherlock Holmes's love interest, a development which never appears in Conan Doyle's books. Love, in the books, is anathema to Holmes, and he would no sooner form a romantic relationship than dance naked down the Strand. A good Sherlock Holmes story must remain within the parameters that Conan Doyle set down. It must be a convincing story about Sherlock Holmes. Otherwise, why have it be about Holmes at all? Why not a different detective? The obvious answer is, of course, because the Holmes name is arguably one of the most famous brands in the English speaking world. But this is not an excuse to run roughshod over such a unique character. This is not to say that the movie is without its strong points. Quite apart from its failings as a Sherlock Holmes adventure, it is fun and features two fanstic actors (Downey and Law) as Holmes and Watson. The fights are, admittedly exciting, and the views of 1800s London are top-knotch. I can only hope that the sequel will include more plot, more mystery, and more of Conan Doyle's Holmes, not Guy Ritchie's.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

5

SusanL.Dec 25, 2009

The film comes across as a cartoon... characters which should have died multiple times, rise with nary a scratch on them.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

larryk.Dec 29, 2009

Boring. Where was the tension? Where was the drama? Ordinary. Law and Downey tried to click but no real chemistry ever developed. McAdams was thrown into the mix, but still no chemistry. Humor was lame, drawing out nary a chuckle. Too bad, Boring. Where was the tension? Where was the drama? Ordinary. Law and Downey tried to click but no real chemistry ever developed. McAdams was thrown into the mix, but still no chemistry. Humor was lame, drawing out nary a chuckle. Too bad, it looked like a lot of work went into creating this period piece. It was a great looking movie. And although Downey threw a lot of punches in the film, "Sherlock Holmes" as a whole delivers only soft blows at best. It won't knock you out.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

JasonWDec 29, 2009

They turned Sherlock Holmes in to a freaking ninja / action hero. Thanks for f'ing it up, Hollywood.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

RyanGeeSep 29, 2010

When it comes to big blockbusters, I generally dislike movies that fall into this category because they simply lack any cerebral characteristic. Surprisingly, Guy Ritchie's Sherlock Holmes is dissimilar to my tendency of aversion of bigWhen it comes to big blockbusters, I generally dislike movies that fall into this category because they simply lack any cerebral characteristic. Surprisingly, Guy Ritchie's Sherlock Holmes is dissimilar to my tendency of aversion of big budget films. Contrary to what I just stated, Sherlock Holmes is undoubtedly not a thoughtful film. But unlike other films in my categorical standards, Holmes makes up for it with its beautiful art direction and action sequences. Even though they are not accurate to the time setting, the scenes of combat are well choreographed and give the film personality. Additionally, the art direction is great, the images of vintage London are just mesmerizing giving the film much needed charm to successfully emulate the original Sherlock Holmes. Lastly, Downey Jr's replicates Conan Doyle's literary character to English perfection with his remarkable false accent and smug personality. With these statements said, the main flaw is the lack of mystery. Sherlock Holmes is a renowned literary character that was famous for the mysteries he solved and how he manipulated every sort of evidence to solve the case. Even though there are some traces of it, Sherlock Holmes ultimately doesn't create a plot of anonymity. It is obvious that the film focuses on action, and that only. That does not necessarily ruin the film, I found the film thoroughly entertaining. But the audience should simply lose the thought that Sherlock Holmes is a mystery; because it ultimately is not thought provoking or mysterious in any way.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

5

WriteFilmLive21Mar 17, 2013

Sherlock Holmes is one of those immortal literary characters who boasts so many film adaptations under his belt that he needs no introduction beyond his name. Even if you've never read any of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's classic mystery storiesSherlock Holmes is one of those immortal literary characters who boasts so many film adaptations under his belt that he needs no introduction beyond his name. Even if you've never read any of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's classic mystery stories involving the British detective, you probably already know of his astounding observational powers, proclivity for cocaine in the absence of mental stimulation, and that he's a master fighter? All right, so obviously, Robert Downey Jr.'s Holmes is taking some slight liberties in that arena, and overall the movie is certainly aiming to please the modern action audience with a tale inclusive of rather frenetic action sequences and quickly-paced mystery elements. Too quickly-paced, in my opinion. The film just seemed to go by a little too fast for me, and I never really got the sense of any real suspense or palpable conflict. In all honesty, this really felt more like a 2-hour promo for the sequel to get you primed for a battle against Holmes's equally immortal archnemesis, Moriarty. However, there is still some fair entertainment value to it all, and in the end I enjoyed it enough to want to check out the second film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

RayzorMooseNov 16, 2013

Sherlock Holmes detects moments of clever intrigue.
The overall film is simply uninteresting. The acting is good and the script is average. The direction is bizarre with random slow motions that attempt to enhance anti climatic sequences of action.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

AaronWasserman1Mar 27, 2016

Meh. I don't care, and I don't think anyone in this movie cares. It is so depressing looking and acted. Sure Downey gives an okay performance, but nothing special. Expected a lot more.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

CalibMcBoltsMay 30, 2016

Sherlock Holmes is quite an entertaining movie but by no means a good one. The obvious fault is the script, it's all over the place, same thing with the cheesy villain, the movie is over long and many scenes could have easily been scrapped toSherlock Holmes is quite an entertaining movie but by no means a good one. The obvious fault is the script, it's all over the place, same thing with the cheesy villain, the movie is over long and many scenes could have easily been scrapped to resolve the pacing issues Sherlock Holmes has. As for Mr Holmes, Robert Downey Jr. portrays him beautifully however the character is ridiculous, how he is put in this film makes him look like an action hero, he fights, shoots, kicks runs, and everything an action hero would do. Sherlock Holmes is more of an action movie than a witty, mysterious, compelling thriller, what a Sherlock Holmes should be! Just look at the show Sherlock, they hit everything right on the head with how to portray a diverse character like Holmes perfectly. Aside from Holmes being an action hero, there is also a very Holmes-like trait missing in this flick. He is not funny, neither sarcastic nor cynical throughout the entire film! That's something what makes the show Sherlock so immaculate. It's bloody hilarious! Sherlock Holmes may get you to chuckle softly a couple of times but by no means is this movie hilarious (in a dark way) as it should be.

Sherlock Holmes is just the next thing that is being thrown into the SFX reboot machine called Hollywood, and instead of making a compelling film that is genuinely good, they take the easy way out to make a complex character simple and throw him into an action movie to please average audiences and cash in on a massive box-office.

I gave it a 7/10 because Sherlock Holmes is still somewhat entertaining, despite being too long and uninteresting at times. If you have nothing better to do and want to watch something decent. Sherlock Holmes isnt a terrible way to spend the evening.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

CatJan 8, 2010

Bears not the slightest resemblance to Sherlock Holmes, and I was so tired of watching people beat each other up. Rachel MacAdams doesn't seem bright enough to be any kind of mastermind, and the plot of the story is a total snooze. Bears not the slightest resemblance to Sherlock Holmes, and I was so tired of watching people beat each other up. Rachel MacAdams doesn't seem bright enough to be any kind of mastermind, and the plot of the story is a total snooze. Downey Jr. is fine, Jude Law is forgettable.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

RanelG.Jan 4, 2010

It has a good premise, the action was pretty great, but for the most part it bores you to death with it's complicated plot.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

RobertI.Jan 13, 2010

A sensationalized version of a cerebral sleuth, with high production values and a poor script. Robert Downey, Jr., as a would-be ninja? I don't think so.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

martinJ.Jan 3, 2010

I'm a fan of Holmes in all iterations. But, this version was too ambiguous. You never understood why Holmes was so tortured, i.e. his addictions and obsessions. Plus, plot was overly convenient albeit in Doyle-like fashion, but come on, I'm a fan of Holmes in all iterations. But, this version was too ambiguous. You never understood why Holmes was so tortured, i.e. his addictions and obsessions. Plus, plot was overly convenient albeit in Doyle-like fashion, but come on, the guy Holmes is looking for is in the coffin. Weak. Finally, the relationship between Holmes and Watson was far less adversarial then presented. While action packed, I found the movie rather dull.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

tylerw.Jan 8, 2010

Started off interesting enough and then quickly dropped off the edge of the table. why ham it up with the gay angle if you are going to introduce the beard/love interest for holmes? made absolutely no sense. guy ritchyyyy at his absolute worst.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

NerijusD.Feb 7, 2010

Not interesting at all. And I hate unrealistic films.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

LeoT.Dec 25, 2009

As of character portrait, it gives us two fresh, more human like Homes and Watson. As of the rest, it is quite disappointing.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

SamJMay 16, 2010

This movie was boring. It was also very gray; not fun to look at, and it didn't make any sense.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

criticsRmadDec 30, 2009

Critcs weren't so mad this time around. This was boring, boring, boring drivel. I haven't been this disappointed in a movie in a long time. Didn't care about the characters and couldn't care less what happened to them. I Critcs weren't so mad this time around. This was boring, boring, boring drivel. I haven't been this disappointed in a movie in a long time. Didn't care about the characters and couldn't care less what happened to them. I like the new idea of Holmes and Watson, but the movie just didn't start up. I couldn't wait for it to be over.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

SteveSDec 30, 2009

Slapdash, senseless and all about effects. Yes RD Jr is fabulous but this vehicle is in constant overdrive and not worth the trip!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

ryancarroll88Aug 27, 2010

Robert Downey Jr. and Jude Law work great together. It's a shame that nothing else in this movie works at all - the worst part is how hard it tries to.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

3

BobCDec 30, 2009

If you have read and enjoyed Sherlock Holmes over the years this movie is a major disappointment. More like a fantasy where Sherlock meets Batman and Robin. Boring with a very poor story line. Younger people will enjoy it but for mature If you have read and enjoyed Sherlock Holmes over the years this movie is a major disappointment. More like a fantasy where Sherlock meets Batman and Robin. Boring with a very poor story line. Younger people will enjoy it but for mature adults it is a waste of time.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

3

TomB.Jan 18, 2010

This movie was terrible. Zero points for anything other than Downey, who was his usual great self. But Guy Ritchie shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a camera again.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

3

JosepPJan 31, 2010

Downey. Jr, even he does not believe in anything happening in the movie,is brilliant. Jude Law Ok. The rest is only BORING. But well, is Guy Ritchie so, what did you expected, a good movie?

0 of 1 users found this helpful

3

EliasCApr 15, 2010

The best I could say about this film is that it inspired me to re-read A. Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes stories. I'd watch Robert Downey Jr in anything but even he was hard to take as he consistently mumbled his lines off screen The best I could say about this film is that it inspired me to re-read A. Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes stories. I'd watch Robert Downey Jr in anything but even he was hard to take as he consistently mumbled his lines off screen making him almost unintelligible and and adding confusion to the already obtuse storyline. I am still puzzled over what the plot was really about. Although the fast action and CGI London was amazing, I wanted more of what a Sherlock Holmes story is supposed to be - the use of recognizable deductive reasoning and those 'ah-ha' moments on my part as I understood what the mystery was all about. No such moments here. This film is Holmes as an action hero and although I appreciate the change in character from the old 1940-1950's stogy British gentleman, this version just did not work for me. Maybe I should have paid closer attention but the confused plot made me wish I'd taken a nap instead.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful

3

QwertyDec 27, 2009

OMG, what a disappointing drag. These aren't interpretations (or reinterpretations or even MISinterpretations) of Holmes and Watson. They're two other guys involved in a clownish caper.

0 of 2 users found this helpful

Sherlock Holmes

User Reviews