Sherlock Holmes
Warner Bros. Pictures | Release Date: December 25, 2009
7.4
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 753 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
585
Mixed:
118
Negative:
50
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
4
NerijusD.Feb 7, 2010
Not interesting at all. And I hate unrealistic films.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
JonlunDFeb 7, 2010
Very good but felt a little long by 3/4 of the way through.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
JamesH.Feb 6, 2010
Sherlock Holmes brings more than a few quick street fighting scenes that brings some critiques to give an automatic hate to the movie. The use of not your fathers Holmes is an excuse for those who can not get past their own childish nature. Sherlock Holmes brings more than a few quick street fighting scenes that brings some critiques to give an automatic hate to the movie. The use of not your fathers Holmes is an excuse for those who can not get past their own childish nature. The movie itself brings us an interesting take on not just Holmes, but the times he lived in. To chuck it aside because its not him sitting there for 30 minutes smoking his pipe then coming up with the answer is to insult Doyle.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
BillyS.Feb 6, 2010
If you go in to a movie with low expectations, you'll more than likely be surpized. As was the case for Sherlock Holmes. Don't get me wrong, Guy Ritchie taking on a literary masterpiece is no way the same as Kubrick and The If you go in to a movie with low expectations, you'll more than likely be surpized. As was the case for Sherlock Holmes. Don't get me wrong, Guy Ritchie taking on a literary masterpiece is no way the same as Kubrick and The Shining, but Ritchie has incorporated Holmes' intelligence with his usual over the top action pieces and made a much better-than-expected entertaining film. Downey and Law play Holmes and Watson with humor and a little gay innuendo, but the way Ritchie has Holmes analyse his fights in slow motion first is a great advantage to all the commotion that follows. All in all, well worth the price of admission.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
3
JosepPJan 31, 2010
Downey. Jr, even he does not believe in anything happening in the movie,is brilliant. Jude Law Ok. The rest is only BORING. But well, is Guy Ritchie so, what did you expected, a good movie?
0 of 1 users found this helpful
5
kgmJan 30, 2010
This certainly isn
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
DanBJan 26, 2010
Entertaining, but basically a Victorian period carbon copy of every plot most of uf have seen time and time again.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
JoeSJan 25, 2010
I liked the pics for Sherlock Holmes and Watson I thought Jude Law and Robert Downy JR were great and not bad action stars it also has a nice plot to it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
SandyJan 23, 2010
Pants. Oh, alright then, if I must say more... Unbearable fake English accent from Downey ( like DvDyke's cocker-nee chimney sweep) grates throughout. No chemistry with Jude Law (who, IMO, has no chemistry in anything I've seen him Pants. Oh, alright then, if I must say more... Unbearable fake English accent from Downey ( like DvDyke's cocker-nee chimney sweep) grates throughout. No chemistry with Jude Law (who, IMO, has no chemistry in anything I've seen him in on his own, never mind with others). Typical Ritchie cockney geezers, silly plot, slo-mo fights (Sooo overdone these days). One decent gag - the fight on the slipway - and one decent actor - Mark Strong - but limp climax. 5 is generous!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
SusanSJan 18, 2010
Really, like a 6.7; a silly, light-headed prologue to what could be a more intriguing sequel once Prof. Moriarty reveals himself. One thing the film has going for it, though--the much discussed chemistry between Holmes and Watson, which all Really, like a 6.7; a silly, light-headed prologue to what could be a more intriguing sequel once Prof. Moriarty reveals himself. One thing the film has going for it, though--the much discussed chemistry between Holmes and Watson, which all involved, including Rachel McAdams, seem to be reveling in. McAdams plays a sporting beard, understanding that Irene Adler is to be witty, cunning, pretty (but not too pretty), and not to get in the way of her two pretty male costars, whose seem to be barely containing their laughter at their characters' suppressed Victorian passion for each other. There is a ambiguously evil plot; Mark Strong does well at an ambiguously evil Lord Blackwell, and Hans Matheson (from The Tudors) actually manages to put some enthusiasm into the whole scheme. Overall, a fun two-plus hours, with some great verbal banter and random action sequences. A fun diversion; let's see if Ritchie can come up with an actual mystery next time.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
TomB.Jan 18, 2010
This movie was terrible. Zero points for anything other than Downey, who was his usual great self. But Guy Ritchie shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a camera again.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
9
JonW.Jan 18, 2010
Loved it. One of Ritchie's best movies, and Downey was hilarious.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
DonaldC.Jan 18, 2010
Excellent movie, entertaining and fun. Great action. Holmes and Watson compliment each other nicely.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
NickGJan 17, 2010
Very fast pace and fun movie, some violence but not extreme. Excellent new take on showing Holmes thought pattern (slow-mo fight scenes). Added +1 as I like Guy Ritchie's other movies and this is in a similar vein. 9/10 if your not a Very fast pace and fun movie, some violence but not extreme. Excellent new take on showing Holmes thought pattern (slow-mo fight scenes). Added +1 as I like Guy Ritchie's other movies and this is in a similar vein. 9/10 if your not a Ritchie fan.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
PeterSJan 16, 2010
I liked it a lot! But I had to forget everything I read as a kid. As an action movie it's great.
1 of 1 users found this helpful
10
JDustJan 15, 2010
the movie was overall quite intruguing and enjoyable. the cinematography was quite unique in some parts, such as at the beginning and in the chase scene leading up to the shipyard. the plot was believable and quite intriguing, and when not the movie was overall quite intruguing and enjoyable. the cinematography was quite unique in some parts, such as at the beginning and in the chase scene leading up to the shipyard. the plot was believable and quite intriguing, and when not compared to the books was an exceptional movie. the psychology was thrilling.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
PiaV.Jan 14, 2010
Excellent movie. Very entertaining...Loved Downey, Law and Adams performances.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
RuthK.Jan 13, 2010
I have read all the Sherlock Holmes stories several times over AND I am a mature person of 60ish. I thought the plot was a clever interpretation of the stories for today's cinema - the biffo and the World Domination seem essential for I have read all the Sherlock Holmes stories several times over AND I am a mature person of 60ish. I thought the plot was a clever interpretation of the stories for today's cinema - the biffo and the World Domination seem essential for an action/adventure movie to hold its own. Interesting Holmes only plucked at his violin, I thought this verged on looking odd, but perhaps it was necessary. A violin sounds better in a book! I thought the characterisations were very true to the stories, interpreted for the biffo and also to lighten the tone a bit. I really liked the sense of fun of the actors and in the plot, that helped the movie a lot. RDJ and Jude law were excellent, each challenging the other to lift their game. The set and scenes were pretty good too, I like the grey and dull tones for the atmosphere.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
RobertI.Jan 13, 2010
A sensationalized version of a cerebral sleuth, with high production values and a poor script. Robert Downey, Jr., as a would-be ninja? I don't think so.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
AnnK.Jan 12, 2010
Refreshing. Great fun. Didn't come to this conclusion until about 24 hours after watching; this Sherlock and Watson and crew stays with you and ripens somehow. Excellent character development of all the major plays and also of many of Refreshing. Great fun. Didn't come to this conclusion until about 24 hours after watching; this Sherlock and Watson and crew stays with you and ripens somehow. Excellent character development of all the major plays and also of many of the peripherals. All in all a rollicking, fun ride. Am going to see again.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
IsabelleK.Jan 12, 2010
Brilliant film with good directing and an excellent, complicated storyline. It's obvious that Downey Jr and Law enjoyed making this film. The only problem was that it was a little bit long.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JanelleM.Jan 10, 2010
Very funny and tense which we all love and quite a thinking movie but brilliant.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
mlJan 10, 2010
Very hard to rate, but I'll bump it because the average is too low. The plot is stupid, the hand-to-hand combat is dubious, it's no more a Sherlock Holmes movie than it is a mystery (closer to a spy movie) and the use of drugs and Very hard to rate, but I'll bump it because the average is too low. The plot is stupid, the hand-to-hand combat is dubious, it's no more a Sherlock Holmes movie than it is a mystery (closer to a spy movie) and the use of drugs and technology is a massive copout destroying all sense of crime-solving deduction. Yet Holmes and Watson are just so *funny.* They carry the movie away from total oblivion and make in entertaining for at least another viewing. Meanwhile their domestic, awkward relationship sets off the homoeroticism alarms of reviewers everywhere. Arthur Conan Doyle's work was always somewhat pulpy. Perhaps this is really a fitting (if entirely faithless) modern reboot.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
GarthNJan 9, 2010
I have not seen a class movie since Slumdog, this was a very good movie. Guy Ritchie is back now that he is over Madona, maybe now he will continue to make some good movies.
1 of 2 users found this helpful
4
tylerw.Jan 8, 2010
Started off interesting enough and then quickly dropped off the edge of the table. why ham it up with the gay angle if you are going to introduce the beard/love interest for holmes? made absolutely no sense. guy ritchyyyy at his absolute worst.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
CatJan 8, 2010
Bears not the slightest resemblance to Sherlock Holmes, and I was so tired of watching people beat each other up. Rachel MacAdams doesn't seem bright enough to be any kind of mastermind, and the plot of the story is a total snooze. Bears not the slightest resemblance to Sherlock Holmes, and I was so tired of watching people beat each other up. Rachel MacAdams doesn't seem bright enough to be any kind of mastermind, and the plot of the story is a total snooze. Downey Jr. is fine, Jude Law is forgettable.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
marlac.Jan 8, 2010
I love Robert Downey but he never once said "elementary my dear Watson".
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
RickAJan 8, 2010
Pretty good movie. I would recommend seeing it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
ColinJan 7, 2010
Damn good movie. Damn good.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
Richb.Jan 5, 2010
Fun enough to be intelligent, and yet confident enough to wink while pulling you into the inside jokes. Near brilliant.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
ChrisKJan 5, 2010
I thought it was fun, fast, and a blast to watch. Seems like critics wanted it to be boring, staunch, and unexciting. Too bad for them. See it. Robert Downey Jr. and Jude Law killed it. A beautiful period piece with loads of laughs.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
DavidP.Jan 5, 2010
Extremely entertaining.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
bryans.Jan 5, 2010
I would love to review the whole of this movie but i honestly don't know if it improves after the first hour. Y'see my fiance and i both walked out after what seemed the longest hour of our lifes. I could genuinly find no reason to I would love to review the whole of this movie but i honestly don't know if it improves after the first hour. Y'see my fiance and i both walked out after what seemed the longest hour of our lifes. I could genuinly find no reason to stay seated as this film completely lacked any kind of heart, and the so called "chemistry" between Law and Downey jnr was completely missing from our screening. Normally when i'm sat in a packed cinema and the audience is deadly silent it usually a good sign. It often means they are compelled and fascinated by the on screen perfomances. This time the audience just looked bored. I can only pray that RDJ's performance in Iron Man 2 makes up for this travesty. p.s. this is the only movie i've ever walked out on and i've seen a lot of rubbish in my time. Hell i even watched terminator 3.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
4
RanelG.Jan 4, 2010
It has a good premise, the action was pretty great, but for the most part it bores you to death with it's complicated plot.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
CarolynM.Jan 4, 2010
Gorgeous to look at, and great performances by Downey and Law, but an eminently forgettable plot: I won't need to see this twice.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
10
TimA.Jan 4, 2010
Brilliant film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
kenGJan 4, 2010
Not Basil Rathbone's Sherlock Holmes. But still a Sherlock Holmes that is an awful lot of fun.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
A.C.Jan 3, 2010
It's nice to read the User coments, honestly, I hate everybody hwo makes a critic, there are so many different comments, from "This sh*t sucked" to "Masterpiece". The Users here aren't giving a critic, they are just saying if the It's nice to read the User coments, honestly, I hate everybody hwo makes a critic, there are so many different comments, from "This sh*t sucked" to "Masterpiece". The Users here aren't giving a critic, they are just saying if the movie liked them or not. A lot of people think they can give a mature coment but no, like this guy John W., what a dumbass, what does he know about writing or acting?… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
WillLJan 3, 2010
If this film wasn't marketed as 'Sherlock Holmes" and the characters were unrelated to the Holmes universe, then this film would have far better ratings. The reviews are simply written by people who are dismayed at the re-writing If this film wasn't marketed as 'Sherlock Holmes" and the characters were unrelated to the Holmes universe, then this film would have far better ratings. The reviews are simply written by people who are dismayed at the re-writing of Holmes' personality and adaptation by Downy Jr.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
martinJ.Jan 3, 2010
I'm a fan of Holmes in all iterations. But, this version was too ambiguous. You never understood why Holmes was so tortured, i.e. his addictions and obsessions. Plus, plot was overly convenient albeit in Doyle-like fashion, but come on, I'm a fan of Holmes in all iterations. But, this version was too ambiguous. You never understood why Holmes was so tortured, i.e. his addictions and obsessions. Plus, plot was overly convenient albeit in Doyle-like fashion, but come on, the guy Holmes is looking for is in the coffin. Weak. Finally, the relationship between Holmes and Watson was far less adversarial then presented. While action packed, I found the movie rather dull.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
DaveJan 3, 2010
This is one of the best movies i have seen so far this year(2009) and maybe one of the best films i have ever seen. The script was very good and the story was extremly enjoying. One of the best things in Sherlock Holmes was the actors; This is one of the best movies i have seen so far this year(2009) and maybe one of the best films i have ever seen. The script was very good and the story was extremly enjoying. One of the best things in Sherlock Holmes was the actors; Robert Downey, Jr. And Jude Law. They are perfect and makes the movie great. Everybody has to see this movie. Honestly i cant really see how Sherlock Holmes can bee called a bad movie. It`s a great moie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
OstafJan 3, 2010
It wasn't amazing but I did like how he was a drug addict thug rather then the mystery solving uptight guy people usually think of. He was the original Holmes.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
XavierE.Jan 3, 2010
One of the wittiest movies I've seen.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JG.Jan 2, 2010
I am not a Guy RItche movie fan but he did a wonderful spin on the Sherlock Holmes story. I enjoyed every moment and cannot wait for a sequel.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
KatieYJan 2, 2010
Sherlock Holmes was a great movie. Holmes was full of action and definitely kept me to the edge of my seat. Robert Downey Jr. was spectacular in Sherlock Holmes, gee its no surprise that he was nominated for a Golden Globe for this movie. I Sherlock Holmes was a great movie. Holmes was full of action and definitely kept me to the edge of my seat. Robert Downey Jr. was spectacular in Sherlock Holmes, gee its no surprise that he was nominated for a Golden Globe for this movie. I will most likely plan on seeing more of Guy Ritchie's films.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
RitchieP.Jan 2, 2010
This movie was awesome. The story was fast paced and intriguing. The acting was phenomenal, and the effects were decent.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
EvinC.Jan 2, 2010
Cool flick. Downey Jr. and Law make a great duo. Love Them.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
RNJan 1, 2010
The movie is at it's very best only ok. Although it portrays a very likable cast of characters and the leads give off a great performance, the story is lacking. It shows almost too much predictablity and as for fans of the Doyle's The movie is at it's very best only ok. Although it portrays a very likable cast of characters and the leads give off a great performance, the story is lacking. It shows almost too much predictablity and as for fans of the Doyle's original works... well if they really liked the originals they'll find themselves disapointed. However for the rest of us whom aren't harsh critics or hard headed fan boys, the movie worth watching once or twice.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
bertkJan 1, 2010
I looked forward to see this movie but it turned out to be a total dissapointment. I agree with NYP and Washington Post, this film is empty as can be. I was with a friend in the theatre but if I was alone I would have left halfway. First of I looked forward to see this movie but it turned out to be a total dissapointment. I agree with NYP and Washington Post, this film is empty as can be. I was with a friend in the theatre but if I was alone I would have left halfway. First of all, there is no color whatsoever, everything is grey, even the makeup of the 2 ladies is so ugly, and their parts are flat and uninteresting. Jude Law is ok, but Robert Downey jr has this frozen look in his eyes, he is not funny, not intriguing and not worth watching. The story is overcomplex, way too rational. Guy Ritchie seems a testosteron driven visual artist with zero talent to push actors to a great achievement. I cant believe it. No wonder Madonna left him, you can say what you want but her music always has a meaning and feelings, even her most dancy tracks. And this is what I missed the most with this movie, the lack of a soul.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
8
rayb.Jan 1, 2010
This is a solid tongue-in-cheek movie!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
RodneyW.Jan 1, 2010
Robert Downey Jr is amazing... one of his best.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
zekeb.Jan 1, 2010
Better than the last Indiana Jones, not as good as most Indy action thrillers, same sort of crazy ass plot. Annoying ending, middling muddled middle, good beginning. Ii will make Madonna jealous.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
AnnLJan 1, 2010
What more do you need in a movie? Great actors leading you on a exciting adventure and keeping you entertained the whole ride. Good work Mr. Richie!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
jgDec 31, 2009
0worst movie I have ever seen. would have walked out but my wife seemed to be interested in it. A headache. Confusing. No discernible plot. stay home. BTW my wife gave it a seven, she must be getting senile.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
10
PaulADec 31, 2009
I knew critics were useless at what they do... but seriously lol, don't quit your day job guys! Best movie of 2009 without a doubt.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
DanCDec 31, 2009
Starts off very slow, but the action scenes are great and its a pretty clever story.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
LouiseH.Dec 31, 2009
I can't fault this movie. It's was so smart and sassy, delightfully witty and gritty. Downey pulled off a perfect intellectual master of observation that is wonderfully messed up and hopeless. The Holmes and Watson dynamic was I can't fault this movie. It's was so smart and sassy, delightfully witty and gritty. Downey pulled off a perfect intellectual master of observation that is wonderfully messed up and hopeless. The Holmes and Watson dynamic was fantastic. I also loved the puncy soundtrack.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
RobertP.Dec 31, 2009
This movie absolutely deserves better than a 6.7 or a 57 as a score! I just saw it yesterday and it was just superb! A mystery, an action, and a comedy in one astounding movie to perfectly top all others for the better part of the decade!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
FionaB.Dec 31, 2009
Great cast, intelligent and witty script. Guy Ritchie at his very best!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
RichM.Dec 31, 2009
Sherlock Holmes is not a character I've ever had any real interest in and Guy Ritchie seemed to be getting worse by the film, so this wasn't exactly a film I had great expectations for. But much to my suprise its a hoot from start Sherlock Holmes is not a character I've ever had any real interest in and Guy Ritchie seemed to be getting worse by the film, so this wasn't exactly a film I had great expectations for. But much to my suprise its a hoot from start to finish. The writers have crafted the Holmes and Watson characters into something both interesting and easy to buy in to. Their relationship gives weight to film that could easilly have lost itself in its slightly bizzare plot and Ritchie's trademark direction. Go see… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
GabrielLDec 30, 2009
ROFL
0 of 1 users found this helpful
4
SteveSDec 30, 2009
Slapdash, senseless and all about effects. Yes RD Jr is fabulous but this vehicle is in constant overdrive and not worth the trip!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
NormanM.Dec 30, 2009
There is no cohesive storyline. Holmes and Watson are reduced to a couple of Ninja like thugs. Its a series of one confrontation after another that had nothing to do with the previous. Dont waste your money on this.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
BryanKDec 30, 2009
Ever since Arthur Doyle wrote the original novel adventures of Sherlock Holmes, their have been a variety of film versions of the stories. Now at the end of this year, a new film version arrives to bring this character into twenty-first Ever since Arthur Doyle wrote the original novel adventures of Sherlock Holmes, their have been a variety of film versions of the stories. Now at the end of this year, a new film version arrives to bring this character into twenty-first century. The film adaptation has a mixed result in its execution and concept. Without revealing the plot, it is implied as a supernatural Sherlock Holmes story, which feels more it should be titled, "Sherlock Holmes meets the Devil rides out". At first, the plot moves at a rapid pace, but slows down by the thirty minute mark. In the title character is Robert Downey Jr who leads the film very well. His take on the character is a more sarcastic and tongue in cheek version with only a decent amount of seriousness. Jude Law is pretty good as Watson and is the serious man between the two appearing a complete commanding actor. As for Rachel McAdams, she has her moments and then she does not. While she does well in her role as Holmes' "female companion", her American voice sounds somewhat out of place in Victorian England. The film's colouring is another aspect which needs to be discussed. The film is shot in a monotone colour scheme in which browns and dark greys appear with the only truly vibrant color being the red in McAdams' dress. However their are problems with the film's structure. At the conclusion, in what could be an open and darker ending, the film seems to go on a little too long and leaves open the idea of a followup. Overall a pretty well done film, but not without its faults. Anyway, Happy New Year to everyone at Metacritic.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
CharlieD.Dec 30, 2009
Really enjoyed the movie, I found it to be a very different take of an action movie and included everything that I love about Sherlock Holmes in it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
criticsRmadDec 30, 2009
Critcs weren't so mad this time around. This was boring, boring, boring drivel. I haven't been this disappointed in a movie in a long time. Didn't care about the characters and couldn't care less what happened to them. I Critcs weren't so mad this time around. This was boring, boring, boring drivel. I haven't been this disappointed in a movie in a long time. Didn't care about the characters and couldn't care less what happened to them. I like the new idea of Holmes and Watson, but the movie just didn't start up. I couldn't wait for it to be over.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
RobertLDec 30, 2009
Awesome job Guy. Jude was never more entertaining and Robert looked like he was having a great time with the part.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
KatieBDec 30, 2009
I generally like Guy Ritchie movies. I generally love all the lead actors, especially RDJ. Chemistry between all the actors was palpable and believable. I agree with other reviewers who said the story line was just not good enough. The I generally like Guy Ritchie movies. I generally love all the lead actors, especially RDJ. Chemistry between all the actors was palpable and believable. I agree with other reviewers who said the story line was just not good enough. The acting, bantering dialogue, well-created relationships, scenery, costuming, music - all merit high scores. Story and plot, not so much. Unfortunately. I would see it again, however. Just for RDJ boxing, sans shirt. Seriously, it was very enjoyable. Hope the sequel has a better story line!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
ShadoeD.Dec 30, 2009
Not the classic Holmes by any means but still very, VERY worth watching!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
BobCDec 30, 2009
If you have read and enjoyed Sherlock Holmes over the years this movie is a major disappointment. More like a fantasy where Sherlock meets Batman and Robin. Boring with a very poor story line. Younger people will enjoy it but for mature If you have read and enjoyed Sherlock Holmes over the years this movie is a major disappointment. More like a fantasy where Sherlock meets Batman and Robin. Boring with a very poor story line. Younger people will enjoy it but for mature adults it is a waste of time.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
2
SK.Dec 30, 2009
The film was boring. The characters were badly rounded, inhuman and often unintelligent. Downey Jr. plays a part well but the part is not Sherlock Holmes. If the name was taken away from the film and it was just a stand alone adventure film The film was boring. The characters were badly rounded, inhuman and often unintelligent. Downey Jr. plays a part well but the part is not Sherlock Holmes. If the name was taken away from the film and it was just a stand alone adventure film with two original characters it would still be terrible. I wouldn't advise this film to Guy RItchie fans or fans of Sherlock Holmes. Just to the masses of people who love the dumbed down action films that the film industry feel are all the public are capable of digesting.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JudyTDec 29, 2009
Every original remake. Humorous and interesting. Very good pairing of Downey and Law.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
CTDec 29, 2009
Downey's acting is excellent. I liked the movie, its funny and witty.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
TinaC.Dec 29, 2009
One of the best movies i have ever seen. Robert Downey Jr. at his best and Jude Law was magnificent. This movie earns two thumbs from me.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
zachDec 29, 2009
Terrible movie, I sat through the whole thing (sadly) and I must say every single thing about this movie is terrible,vile,horrible,and many other bad things to say about this movie.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
5
JasonWDec 29, 2009
They turned Sherlock Holmes in to a freaking ninja / action hero. Thanks for f'ing it up, Hollywood.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
MelF.Dec 29, 2009
Guy Ritchie has done a great job turning the stereotypical Holmes persona on its head. Drawing more on Conan Doyle's books than his moviemaking predecessors, Ritchie has cast RDJ and Jude Law as the cocky, dirty, and delightful Holmes Guy Ritchie has done a great job turning the stereotypical Holmes persona on its head. Drawing more on Conan Doyle's books than his moviemaking predecessors, Ritchie has cast RDJ and Jude Law as the cocky, dirty, and delightful Holmes and Watson. This movie leaves little room to dissappoint.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
larryk.Dec 29, 2009
Boring. Where was the tension? Where was the drama? Ordinary. Law and Downey tried to click but no real chemistry ever developed. McAdams was thrown into the mix, but still no chemistry. Humor was lame, drawing out nary a chuckle. Too bad, Boring. Where was the tension? Where was the drama? Ordinary. Law and Downey tried to click but no real chemistry ever developed. McAdams was thrown into the mix, but still no chemistry. Humor was lame, drawing out nary a chuckle. Too bad, it looked like a lot of work went into creating this period piece. It was a great looking movie. And although Downey threw a lot of punches in the film, "Sherlock Holmes" as a whole delivers only soft blows at best. It won't knock you out.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
CiaranH.Dec 29, 2009
Over the years there have been countless adaptations of Sir Arthut Conan Doyle's series of books revolving aroudn the man with the most brilliant mind in the world, Sherlock Holmes. In fact, there have been so many adaptations from so Over the years there have been countless adaptations of Sir Arthut Conan Doyle's series of books revolving aroudn the man with the most brilliant mind in the world, Sherlock Holmes. In fact, there have been so many adaptations from so many different medias that it takes a very good film to stick out from the Sherlock Holmes crowd. Robert Downey Jr. (Holmes) brings his own unique style to the character. He shows previously unseen side of Holmes, he makes the character his own, much like Daniel Craig did in the recent James Bond films. Although the plot is developed very slowly throughout the course of the film (which is definitely overlong), Guy Ritchie manages to keep us hooked through dramatic fights and a clever, witty script. In conclusion, if you want to see another boring and repetitive adaption of Sherlock Holmes do not go and see this film, if however if you want to see a unique and brilliant take on the story do come and see this thrilling film.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
adrianj.Dec 29, 2009
When i saw 57 i had to make a comment cause the movie was very good. he looks and acts nothing like the Sherlock Holmes we grew up with but the movie was very funny and action packed.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
FabioDec 29, 2009
Great movie, we finally have a Sherlock and a Watson as close as possible to Doyle's books. also we find in the movie all the most important elements from the original books. movie's ending is open to sequel. I'm only a tiny Great movie, we finally have a Sherlock and a Watson as close as possible to Doyle's books. also we find in the movie all the most important elements from the original books. movie's ending is open to sequel. I'm only a tiny bit disappointed to some exaggerations (you ask yourself how they came out alive from certain situations), but that really doesn't matter so much.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
IvanT.Dec 29, 2009
As anyone could tell from the previews, Doyle's Holmes is only a distant ancestor of this portrayal of the London detective. A fun film that is intended to mesmerize the audience with a steady stream of witty dialogue, clever mystery, As anyone could tell from the previews, Doyle's Holmes is only a distant ancestor of this portrayal of the London detective. A fun film that is intended to mesmerize the audience with a steady stream of witty dialogue, clever mystery, and thrilling action. Small wonder the critics don't approve. As blockbusters go, this one's worth its weight. Best viewed in the cinema, once.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
AndrewM.Dec 28, 2009
Great action movie balanced well with detective work. It seems like most people think they're Sherlock Holmes experts and complain that the wrote his character bad in this film. Look it up! the original Sherlock Holmes was a eccentric, Great action movie balanced well with detective work. It seems like most people think they're Sherlock Holmes experts and complain that the wrote his character bad in this film. Look it up! the original Sherlock Holmes was a eccentric, dirty cock addict. They wrote him exactly as they should have.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
FrankO.Dec 28, 2009
I enjoyed this movie but it felt very long. The chase scenes and the beginning set-up were too long. I liked the interaction and relationship between Holmes and Watson. Was this suppose to be an action/adventure story or a mystery? It did I enjoyed this movie but it felt very long. The chase scenes and the beginning set-up were too long. I liked the interaction and relationship between Holmes and Watson. Was this suppose to be an action/adventure story or a mystery? It did not do justice to either.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
WilliamJ.Dec 28, 2009
This movie seems to have more of the original books in mind than the old Holmes movies, to which I believe is an optimal decision. If Doyle was alive today, he would've made a Holmes movie similar to this one.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
NicolaM.Dec 28, 2009
Awesome movie Brilliant acting (Rob and Jude are pretty damn good together) and finally something similar to the original Holmes, not to mention the beautiful Old London reconstruction
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
JohnR.Dec 27, 2009
This is not your grandfather's Sherlock Holmes, but Law and Downey are expertly directed, the story is complex and very chock full of Holmes' style discovery. Add to that two lovely ladies and gorgeous CGI of 19th Century London This is not your grandfather's Sherlock Holmes, but Law and Downey are expertly directed, the story is complex and very chock full of Holmes' style discovery. Add to that two lovely ladies and gorgeous CGI of 19th Century London and you very much get your monies' worth. This is the beginning of a long franchise, I am certain.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
DavidH.Dec 27, 2009
Rodney was simply great in this movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
MarthaR.Dec 27, 2009
Very entertaining movie. We all know going in this is NOT your mother's Sherlock Holmes, so no one should be critical of the outlandish scenes. It's witty, great action, wonderful sets and visually intriguing aura of dirty London. Very entertaining movie. We all know going in this is NOT your mother's Sherlock Holmes, so no one should be critical of the outlandish scenes. It's witty, great action, wonderful sets and visually intriguing aura of dirty London. Downey is mesmerizing! I was in awe of the stunning action scenes and actually cringed waiting for the moment of danger to pass. Lots of fun surprises in this movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
WilliamC.Dec 27, 2009
Sherlock Holmes: A Mystery to Solved As the Christmas festivities come to a close, other opportunities open up in the world of theatrical entertainment, with the release of Sherlock Homes starring Robert Downy Jr., Jude Law, and Rachel Sherlock Holmes: A Mystery to Solved As the Christmas festivities come to a close, other opportunities open up in the world of theatrical entertainment, with the release of Sherlock Homes starring Robert Downy Jr., Jude Law, and Rachel McAdams. Yet with this installment of Holmes, after so many before have been a delightful and true emersion into the pages of creator Arthur Conan Doyle, has become like so many movies of this generation; an action thriller full of explosions and special effects. The plot takes us out of the original stories, and into a time where Holmes (Downy) has become despondent from a lack of cases, after solving his latest one in the opening of the movie. Watson (Law) is preparing to move out of 221B Baker Street to consider marriage. Although this is obviously putting strain on the dynamic duo… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
3
QwertyDec 27, 2009
OMG, what a disappointing drag. These aren't interpretations (or reinterpretations or even MISinterpretations) of Holmes and Watson. They're two other guys involved in a clownish caper.
0 of 2 users found this helpful
9
CraigW.Dec 27, 2009
The writing was excellent -- "Holmes" is in some ways truer to the character in the book here than past Holmes movies have been. This is not a "re-imagining" of the character. It's a very engaging, authentic-feeling ride for anyone who sees it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
JanetMDec 27, 2009
Does Guy Ritchie know how to deliver anything else but this over-stylized crap?
0 of 1 users found this helpful
2
NancyTDec 27, 2009
I agree with John W.- awful!!!!
0 of 1 users found this helpful
10
JakeRDec 27, 2009
A perfect movie. The critics should stop acting like elitist bastards. Some say it was too much action for Holmes, some say it was boring. We either have snooty elitists or gun-obsessed action-heads. It was a the best movie of 09
1 of 1 users found this helpful
8
BrianJ.Dec 27, 2009
Not a movie for Holmes fans who cant look past the interpretation of the character they grew up with. That said, The writers have done something compelling. They took everything that "Is" Sherlock Holmes and without adding anything of their Not a movie for Holmes fans who cant look past the interpretation of the character they grew up with. That said, The writers have done something compelling. They took everything that "Is" Sherlock Holmes and without adding anything of their own, created a completely different representation of the character. What comes out IS an enjoyable character, even if it is diluted slightly by Robert Downey Jr. (when did he magically become a one-trick pony?) and Jude Law makes for a perfect counterpoint and Ally as Watson. The Plot, barring sensationalism, IS a Doyle-esque mystery, and the Technique used by Richie and his Cinematographer(s?) to show Holmes' thoughts and deductions is a great, if slightly over used feature of the narrative. I admit, I grew up as a huge fan of the Character (and the Jeremy Brett rendition), so it took 15 minutes or more of screen time for me to finally shut off that voice in my head saying "That's not Holmes!" Once I got passed that, I found a fun, enjoyable, decidedly "Sherlock Holmes-like" Flick. I'd definitely recommend it to anyone who isn't a die-hard fan of the source, and to any true fan who can get passed the differences in this version, and enjoy the movie beneath.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
RobertPtDec 27, 2009
Very little to be positive about in this movie. Downey does a good job of giving life to a Sherlock character that is terribly written. Downey is funny in many places but that is a fault not a plus. Law is good as Watson and the character is Very little to be positive about in this movie. Downey does a good job of giving life to a Sherlock character that is terribly written. Downey is funny in many places but that is a fault not a plus. Law is good as Watson and the character is decently written. McAdams as the female lead is terrible in a terrible role. The stars did not have much to work with. The story is lame (poor Harry Potter ripoff - 2 males and female chasing a nether-world villain), the staging is uninspired and the costuming is weak. Save your money and avoid at all costs.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JoeyKDec 26, 2009
Yes, it's a different kind of Sherlock Holmes, but it's still a good one. It's a Hollywood treatment of the character, but it works.The first thing the movie does is show Holmes using his quick wit and amazing observational Yes, it's a different kind of Sherlock Holmes, but it's still a good one. It's a Hollywood treatment of the character, but it works.The first thing the movie does is show Holmes using his quick wit and amazing observational skills to beat up a guy. The movie is simultaneously clever and explodey. It works. Recommended.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
TArkoBDec 26, 2009
Would've been a nine if Downey woudn't have mumbled his way through the film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
AaronGDec 26, 2009
It's kind of a hard movie to like. I mean, the cast and acting is great, and the script is never really bad, but at the same time nothing that happens makes you go "OH MY GOD I HAVE TO SEE THAT AGAIN". The story is a bit hard to follow It's kind of a hard movie to like. I mean, the cast and acting is great, and the script is never really bad, but at the same time nothing that happens makes you go "OH MY GOD I HAVE TO SEE THAT AGAIN". The story is a bit hard to follow and the way Sherlock figures things out are kind of silly. There's huge potential for Guy Ritchie to make a franchise off this movie, and I think I might like that. But one thing I've GOT to say, this is a beautifully made movie. All the sets and costumes, even the scenery, matches the mood of the plot perfectly. The grey-blue color scheme adds to the mood instead of taking away from it like some other films (coughtwilightcough). It wasn't a bad movie at all, but I can understand why some won't like it. If you're interested in seeing this, go ahead and watch it, you'll enjoy.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
Page:
More From This Movie

57 Critic Reviews

7.4 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 77 Project Hail Mary
2 75 Send Help
3 73 Hoppers
4 72 The Sheep Detectives
5 68 Crime 101
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL