Fox Searchlight Pictures | Release Date: December 2, 2011
7.7
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 339 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
268
Mixed:
57
Negative:
14
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
1
raporgiAug 4, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Painfully boring. Fastblender is wasted on this nonsensical bore of a movie. its tedious, unsurprising and just fails to be interesting. The subject matter is too shallow for a movie that takes itself waaaaay to seriously about a guy who's really hung up on getting off. its not as if every man hasnt had urges, also the subplot with the sister feels like extra padding.They couldnt just show Fastblender jerking off or battling his wet noodle for the majority of the movie. Just skip it. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
3
georgeblommeJan 8, 2012
I wish I could give this movie a good rating. Its starts with a fairly handsome guy, nicely built in all proportions, who is a sex addict. Sometimes he gets what he wants (always friendly; this guy does not rape), but on other occasions heI wish I could give this movie a good rating. Its starts with a fairly handsome guy, nicely built in all proportions, who is a sex addict. Sometimes he gets what he wants (always friendly; this guy does not rape), but on other occasions he cannot produce. His sister lives with him, and she appears to be on the verge of suicide from Day One, making this film complicated and dark. The guy, who suddenly seems to have lost interest and or ability to perform sex, plus put up with the antics of his sister, walks endlessly through the night streets of Manhattan, or jogs and jogs, or rides half-filled, old newspaper-littered subway trains endlessly. These scenes where he's losing himself, or possibly trying to find a way out of sexual addiction go on and on -- making this 1-hour, 45-minute film seem like a 5-hour ride on a dirty subway train. There are good street shots of Manhattan, but at the now-famous Standard hotel on the High Line, they miss the opportunity to have the woman bracing herself against the picture glass picture windows while being pumped from behind - something that supposedly happens regularly in real life every night - much to the delight of High Line voyeurs. Why does the film shy away from the big window scenes - maybe a nod to hotel management's requests? Go see, but I think you may be disappointed too. Expand
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
3
csw12Jan 25, 2016
Shame is an empty pointless film. Steve McQueen draws out certain scenes way beyond their breaking point. At times the movie felt like it might start to take off, but in a blink of an eye, falls back into a bottomless pit of pretentious trash.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
3
ParmesanoApr 6, 2014
It's not offensive, it's not particularly interesting, it's mainly just boring, and extremely overrated.

The guy's problem is uninteresting and 90% of the male population has the same urges/done worse. Personally I felt that some of the
It's not offensive, it's not particularly interesting, it's mainly just boring, and extremely overrated.

The guy's problem is uninteresting and 90% of the male population has the same urges/done worse. Personally I felt that some of the behaviour/dialogue felt wrong to, perhaps due to the choice of actor (European), e.g. the bar scene and some others. I was not surprised to find out later on that McQueen is a black guy as it would suit a black actor much better.

I sat through it until the end so I guess it wasn't completely terrible but I sure did feel as if I had wasted my time.
Expand
0 of 8 users found this helpful08
All this user's reviews