Shadow of the Vampire

Lions Gate Films Home Entertainment | Release Date: December 29, 2000

7.5	USER SCORE Generally favorable reviews based on 87 Ratings

USER RATING DISTRIBUTION

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Watch Now

Stream On

Buy on

Review this movie

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.

Check box if your review contains spoilers

0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User score By date Most helpful

ERG1008Aug 23, 2010

Man tries to make Dracula film without Bram Stoker's consent, goes to eerie locations, gets oddball to play the vampire, things go wrong.
With a cast as decent as this & the story based on such a classic film, it's a shame this was nowhereMan tries to make Dracula film without Bram Stoker's consent, goes to eerie locations, gets oddball to play the vampire, things go wrong.
With a cast as decent as this & the story based on such a classic film, it's a shame this was nowhere near as good as it could have been.
It begins very well but quickly starts to jump about & become disjointed & does seemed very rushed by the end.
Willem Dafoe is amazing as Max Schrek but they should have used him more sparingly & made him even more mysterious.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

KarthXLRMar 25, 2011

While Dafoe and Malkovich deliver on all fronts, the acting by a good majority of the cast is mediocre-to-bad at times. The story is very slow, boring at times. Before I forget, it's not scary either. Nothing to fear children.

0 of 5 users found this helpful05

All this user's reviews

Meth-dudeNov 5, 2018

With strong acting performances (especially Malkovich and Dafoe), an interesting story, great cinematography and an eerie atmosphere, Shadow of the Vampire is not only one of the strongest horror movie of the 2000s, it's also one of the bestWith strong acting performances (especially Malkovich and Dafoe), an interesting story, great cinematography and an eerie atmosphere, Shadow of the Vampire is not only one of the strongest horror movie of the 2000s, it's also one of the best vampire movie out there.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

FilipeNetoAug 24, 2018

This film is about another film, portraying, very fictionally, the filming of the iconic silent film "Nosferatu" (1922). The logic of the film rests on an urban myth, whereby Friedrich Murnau (the film's director) hired a true vampire to theThis film is about another film, portraying, very fictionally, the filming of the iconic silent film "Nosferatu" (1922). The logic of the film rests on an urban myth, whereby Friedrich Murnau (the film's director) hired a true vampire to the main role. The problem with this movie is that, unless you're a total movie buff, you'll hardly know "Nosferatu" well enough to know the existence of this urban myth, and this will make this movie a bit illogical and meaningless. The secret to understanding the film also goes through one or two questions that are implicitly posed. The first is easy: how far should we go in the name of art? Is the perfection of the finished work worth any sacrifice? The second question is who is the worst monster? Orlock, driven by his lust for blood, or Murnau, driven by his artistic blindness? I really enjoyed the performance of Willem Defoe, who gave life to the vampire-actor. He not only was able to recreate the gestures and affected manners of the character we see in the silent movie, as he made him mysterious and a little fatalistic in the way he thinks and behaves. John Malkovich also shone in the role of an obese filmmaker, and has a few phrases in the dialogue that are true homages to the cinematographic art. The cinematography and visual beauty of the opening credits, in shades of black and sepia, are other positive aspects of a film unable to please the general public but perfectly able to please the most skilled and knowledgeable audiences.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews