Read User Reviews and Submit your own for Scream 4

10

RhysHilsonApr 15, 2011

To start, I am a massive "Scream" trilogy fan, but my thought in going in was that "the franchise has had it's time and this is completely new, a new trilogy". The film rewrites the rules of the first trilogy, and one of the most evidentTo start, I am a massive "Scream" trilogy fan, but my thought in going in was that "the franchise has had it's time and this is completely new, a new trilogy". The film rewrites the rules of the first trilogy, and one of the most evident changes comes in the opening scene, in which 2 characters, 1 male, 1 female are killed. This scene will be seen as either boring and long-winded, or completely genius; my belief being the latter. It excited me and shocked me, without ever leaving the viewer lost, and in it's last moments (while giving a violent nod to a famous death from the 1st film) becomes the most violent and aggressive pre-title scene from all 4 films. Following a couple of misleading "jumps" and a little exposition, with the original 3 survivors positions all being developed quickly and efficiently, it isn't long before the film delves into the "who's next?" pace. With the standard "CiCi/Candy" kill being presented, in this movie as a more intelligent, brutal killing (and a particularly active Sidney Prescott facing off with 'Ghostface'), the movie already feels very different to it's predecessors. The kills are creative, quick and in heavy supply, and the list of suspects is soon whittled down, leading to the most shocking, well-acted, and at times hilarious conclusion that leads the viewer asking "When is Scream 5 coming out?".
The overall game is still same, but the rules are so different that this movie is the most dramatic of the lot. Roll on 5.… Expand

7 of 7 users found this helpful70

All this user's reviews

7

heyitsmegrif4Dec 23, 2011

Hey Wes Craven I give you an applause for bringing the franchise back to form and earning its good reputation back again with solid scares, skilled kills, and laughs. Too bad it did bad at the box-office you could start another trilogy. IHey Wes Craven I give you an applause for bringing the franchise back to form and earning its good reputation back again with solid scares, skilled kills, and laughs. Too bad it did bad at the box-office you could start another trilogy. I give this movie 71%.… Expand

5 of 5 users found this helpful50

All this user's reviews

10

liptapApr 15, 2011

This is how it has gone in the series:

Scream; this set the standard & was brilliantly devised with the plot, & characters. 10/10 Scream 2; not as good as the original, but still extremely fun & ejoyable. 9/10 Scream 3; it hasThis is how it has gone in the series:

Scream; this set the standard & was brilliantly devised with the plot, & characters. 10/10
Scream 2; not as good as the original, but still extremely fun & ejoyable. 9/10
Scream 3; it has creative kills & an interesting twist, but is full of plot holes. 8/10

Then there's Scream 4, which easily beats out the the other sequels & is back to the standard of the original. A great new cast & a very interesting ending (won't give anything away, but WOW!) Easily one of the best movies of the year.… Expand

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

6

MovieGuyBrianApr 15, 2011

The series that refuses to die. Most horror movies have been going down hill for years so I'm glad they took another stab at resurrecting the SCREAM franchise - why not?! Big stars, decent twists and lots of blood will almost always equateThe series that refuses to die. Most horror movies have been going down hill for years so I'm glad they took another stab at resurrecting the SCREAM franchise - why not?! Big stars, decent twists and lots of blood will almost always equate to big box office bucks and SCREAM 4 adequately mocks and embraces the horror genre all at the same time. It's a little cheesy and too self-referential for it's own good (which is the idea; although I'm not sure they intended to be as over-the-top as it is) - but it mostly knows how to maintain the suspense, occasionally entertain and, heaven forbid, be a watchable movie. It won't bring back much life to a dilapidated genre - but it works. If you're a fan of the series carve out a little time this weekend - you won't be disappointed.… Expand

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

7

HalfwelshmanJan 28, 2012

I was really quite surprised at how much I liked Scream 4 - I was honestly expecting another Scream 3, or worse. The franchise is probably never going to equal the heights of the first installment again, but miraculously, it still remains aI was really quite surprised at how much I liked Scream 4 - I was honestly expecting another Scream 3, or worse. The franchise is probably never going to equal the heights of the first installment again, but miraculously, it still remains a hugely enjoyable series. Wes Craven thankfully got the three main players back again (four if you count Roger L. Jackson). Neve Campbell's Sidney Prescott still makes a likeable protagonist (even if you wonder why, after all she's been through, she doesn't arm herself at all times) and David Arquette's Sherriff Dewey and Courtney Cox's Gale Weathers are still entertaining. The cast of young newcomers including Emma Roberts, Hayden Panettiere and Rory Culkin all serve their purpose, either by dying horribly or as potential Ghostface suspects. So it's business as usual in Wes Craven's Scream world, and while the plot's a little too predictable, some of the self-referential winks to the audience a little smug and annoying, and the run-time a bit lengthy, the film's energy and Kevin Willaimson's sharp script keeps you entertained throughout (bucket-loads of blood and some good jokes don't hurt either). So it's not as good as the original (something the film itself even amusingly points out at one point), but I struggle to think of many (if any) other fourth films in a franchise that are this decent, and that still have something to say. Horror films, after all, have evolved (or devolved, depending on your perspective) over the last decade, with handheld horror mockumentaries, torture-porn and the seemingly endless procession of remakes giving Craven an Williamson ample ammunition for affectionate parody. Scream 4 is a much more satisfying conclusion to the series than its underwhelming predecessor, but unfortunately, Hollywood being what it is, I doubt Ghostface is gone for good...… Expand

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

7

vernMar 22, 2012

When it was first released in 1996, the original 'Scream' was an intelligent, and fun horror film that gave the slasher genre a big boost of much needed energy. 'Scream 2' was an entertaining sequel that cleverly built upon what the originalWhen it was first released in 1996, the original 'Scream' was an intelligent, and fun horror film that gave the slasher genre a big boost of much needed energy. 'Scream 2' was an entertaining sequel that cleverly built upon what the original film started. 'Scream 3', although not as bad as some people say, was admittedly a bit of a let down. So after more than 10 years of horror films in between, we have 'Scream 4', ready to dissect and poke fun at recent horror films (and the state of the horror genre in general) once again, and it turns out, it's pretty good! If you thought this series couldn't get any more self-aware, you were very, very wrong. 'Scream 4' is a hall of mirrors to the horror genre. It is arguable that this film is self-aware to a fault (with constant references not just to other horror movies, but to past 'Scream' films as well). And this time around the comedy is turned up a few notches, which does take away a bit from some of the bloodshed. But, if taken with a small grain of salt, this can still be a fun movie. So enough about the cons, and onto the pros. Although not as good as 'Scream', 'Scream 4' is about on par with 'Scream 2', and is admittedly an improvement over 'Scream 3'. For starters, it has a decent amount of fresh faces to liven things up (Hayden Penattiere and Rory Culkin are two standouts). Like before, the characters in the film all speak with clever, self-aware dialogue. There are also a few reasonably suspenseful set pieces, and the who will get it next/whodunit angle still works well enough to keep you guessing throughout the film. If these movies are not your thing, I would be surprised if this one changed your mind. But if you do enjoy the 'Scream' films for what they are (entertaining and suspenseful horror-comedies), then give 'Scream 4' a try.… Expand

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

6

rotkuMar 25, 2012

Scream 4 does exactly what is expected, roll the first three movie together, add a twist (although hardly a surprise when it does happen) and let the body count rise. Worth a watch if you enjoyed the first three.

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

8

ashley_Jan 15, 2012

I was a bit hesitant in seeing this movie, because of the typical downfall of horror films that just keeping making more movies when it should have stopped way sooner, such as Saw, or Final Destination. But this movie surprised me. As always,I was a bit hesitant in seeing this movie, because of the typical downfall of horror films that just keeping making more movies when it should have stopped way sooner, such as Saw, or Final Destination. But this movie surprised me. As always, and I won't spoil anything, the killer or killers at the end were totally unexpected. Courtney Cox and David Arquette were great in their parts, but then again, they always are. Emma Roberts blindsided me. I had no idea her acting abilities were to that standard, as I always remembered her from 'Unfabulous' or 'Hotel for Dogs'. She really played her part magnificently. The movie was every bit as good as the first three, or maybe even better.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

8

bustinitApr 15, 2011

Its true, its not particularly scary. Once you've made enough sequels, it kind of loses its effect. However, this is definitely an entertaining movie. I laughed out loud a number of times, and unlike a lot of horror films, it wasn'tIts true, its not particularly scary. Once you've made enough sequels, it kind of loses its effect. However, this is definitely an entertaining movie. I laughed out loud a number of times, and unlike a lot of horror films, it wasn't unintentional. Was also great from a nostalgia point of view. Would definitely recommend to fans of the series. For those disappointed with Scream 3, you could quite easily ignore that movie and pretend this was the real Scream 3.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

ImTheOwensApr 15, 2011

I'm a HUGE Scream fan. Scream 2 has always been my favorite for some reason. I think at this point it's purely nostalgic. For some reason as a kid I was obsessed with these movies, which is strange, I know. Any way, long story short, if youI'm a HUGE Scream fan. Scream 2 has always been my favorite for some reason. I think at this point it's purely nostalgic. For some reason as a kid I was obsessed with these movies, which is strange, I know. Any way, long story short, if you like the original trilogy, you'll like this one. Better than Scream 3 by far! Probably the most gory Scream movie yet and in my opinion, although none of them are all that scary, this is probably the scariest. Check it out!… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

TDG1992Apr 29, 2011

Scream 4 is the horror movie i have ever seen.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

JfiloJun 20, 2011

This movie was excellent! It was clever, scary, and the acting was great especially Emma Roberts and Hayden P. What was unusual was how it definitely beat out the 3rd movie right off the bat. Worth to watch.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

maximumxxxxSep 1, 2011

I have to say, I was impressed with this little reboot. I was eager to see it, but was not expecting much, boy did it surprise me. I don't think they could have done better at trying to bring the franchise back, I would almost say I like thisI have to say, I was impressed with this little reboot. I was eager to see it, but was not expecting much, boy did it surprise me. I don't think they could have done better at trying to bring the franchise back, I would almost say I like this better than the first movie, maybe not as good but I still really liked it. It was entertaining and had some good twists and the ending was very pleasing. I couldn't have ask for more from this movie. If your a fan of the franchise i would suggest giving this one a shot, just remember its not the original! its still a sequel and will never have the cult following of the original, but it is still a great installment and it will be added to my movie collection the day it is released on dvd.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

driesy8888Sep 5, 2011

Scream 4 flies past Scream 3 as a better film. Seeing Neve on the big screen again was an absolute pleasure. It is by far the funnest Horror Movie I've seen in a long time. Was great to see a horror movie use its brain and not rely on bloodScream 4 flies past Scream 3 as a better film. Seeing Neve on the big screen again was an absolute pleasure. It is by far the funnest Horror Movie I've seen in a long time. Was great to see a horror movie use its brain and not rely on blood spurts, hacked body limbs and torture porn. While it's not a solid 10, it's way up there. But Scream 1 and 2 still reign supreme… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

rafael14Dec 17, 2011

is the best film in the Scream series, because the deaths are more real, the picture quality is better than the other three and also has more positive than anything else. Emma Roberts and to complete ta fantastic in this movie

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

madmandonnaNov 20, 2011

Who could forget the first time Drew Barrymore met her end after being hunted down by ghost face in the original scream film some 15 years ago. Its been a decade since scream underwhelmed everybody with its lacklustre third instalment andWho could forget the first time Drew Barrymore met her end after being hunted down by ghost face in the original scream film some 15 years ago. Its been a decade since scream underwhelmed everybody with its lacklustre third instalment and with a fourth on the way I was sceptical about how the fourth would go and how it would affect the introduction to the review I would to write about it.

In my second paragraph, I can now write about how much I enjoyed the film and how I can now use my summary in that Scream 4 (or Scre4m)was "great fun and I was pleasantly surprised". I can't begin to tell you how true this statement is, the plot manages to weave a tidy little knot of a mystery that comes to a surprising and comical climax. The body count is large, making killings in this instalment come thick and fast. Though with a reduced age rating, scream 4 is far more gruesome than the previous threesome and a lot more in keeping with the current horror movie gore fest. To finish off the second paragraph of my review I will conclude that Scream manages to stick to its guns, but modernise itself not unlike the remakes it satirises.

Paragraph 3 contains scenes of critical nature. Now the film is paced very well, however there are a lot of characters to get through. And despite its self aware nature the two-dimensional characters are so underplayed that its hard to feel much for them as they quickly get stabbed to death. The only characters you feel much dread for is Gale, Dewey and Sidney as familiar faces that you don't want to meet there bloody doom,however the new cast have so little characterisation that you really couldn't care less if their stabbed to death and left to dry on their parents lawns. The film also wasn't as scary as the original and despite the "kids" knowing the rules of the horror movie they were starring in they all seem to go outside to investigate a strange noise when they know they're all being hunted by a killer. Whether this is done on purpose, as to mock other horror films is a possibility, but to be honest it would make the film a lot less predictable if they didn't make there predecessors mistakes.

So my conclusion is gonna be as sharp and concise as a horror movie should be. Scream 4 is entertaining, funny and thrilling. And one of the last lines of one of the survivors is bloody great.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

geminirsNov 23, 2011

Highly anticipated new slasher by Master Wes Craven. Lots of gore and an intriguing case of the murders. As always we seem not to know who the murderer is up to the end of the movie. Obviously, there's nothing in the movie we can't expect,Highly anticipated new slasher by Master Wes Craven. Lots of gore and an intriguing case of the murders. As always we seem not to know who the murderer is up to the end of the movie. Obviously, there's nothing in the movie we can't expect, nevertheless this is just a two-hour-long thrilling journey with Neve Campbell in the leading role. Looking forward to the next episode. Good 8 from me!… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

MegWhiteleyMar 2, 2012

A great sequel-remake, Scre4m or Scream 4 is really awesome, the intro, jaja is very funny, Emma Roberts, David Arquette, Courteney Cow and Neve Campbell are awesome. This is a great example of sequel.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

RikiegeNov 14, 2012

The best movie of the saga.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

5

TVJerryApr 29, 2011

This sequel hopes to outsmart the audience by turning the tropes upside down, but it's more posing that payoff. It's the tenth anniversary of the original massacre and the town's teens are celebrating, even the original trio is backThis sequel hopes to outsmart the audience by turning the tropes upside down, but it's more posing that payoff. It's the tenth anniversary of the original massacre and the town's teens are celebrating, even the original trio is back (Campbell, Cox & Arquette). Naturally, Ghost Face starts stabbing and provides plenty of bloody blows. There are a few mild jumps, but updating it to the social media slant isn't really that original.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

10

TheOnlineGamerApr 15, 2011

I Loved the first Scream and the second one, not sure about the Third one but this is a Perfect Sequel! it wraps up everything in the Past and brings new Elements to the formula. Im not so Happy about this being a new Set of Sequels becauseI Loved the first Scream and the second one, not sure about the Third one but this is a Perfect Sequel! it wraps up everything in the Past and brings new Elements to the formula. Im not so Happy about this being a new Set of Sequels because this one Ended really Good!… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

0

BerCJul 4, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The artistic medium of film is very subjective. Every audience member has a different set of criteria they use to measure their viewing experience. Not everyone shares the same set of criteria. If we did, what a bland and uninspired world this would be.

What I Personally Liked About "Scream 4":
Um. Give me a minute. I'm thinking. I'm thinking!!! It's saying something when even the normally reliable Neve Campbell seems like she's just going through the motions to grab a quick paycheck. Well, here's one thing I do like: Hayden Panettiere. She always deserves more credit than she receives and has the propensity to be a serious actress if given the opportunity. She's easily the best part of this sorry excuse of a "film." I suppose Emma Roberts is okay, too. She's certainly not horrible, she just feels like she's holding back for some reason, even in the finale. She needs to learn to cut loose a little.

What I Personally Disliked About "Scream 4":
It's hard to pick a place to begin with this one. I will say that the triple false opening is a mind-numbingly tedious experience that should have been scrapped. There is a lifeless pacing to the entire production and there are too many stretches that rely on cliches instead of actual substance. There are no really solid supporting characters. While a lot of the ancillary characters weren't exactly fully formed in the original trilogy, they were still more interesting and had more personality than the ones seen here. The relationship between Dewey and Gale that was so unbearable in the third chapter has become rip-your-eyeballs-out-of-their-sockets-so-you-don't-have-to-witness-it-anymore bad. But the biggest drawback to this film is the one missed opportunity that could have saved the entire movie: Sidney Prescott should not have lived. Seriously. This was a monumental oversight by the filmmakers that could have brought about something unique within the genre. Having Jill Roberts get away with murder could have opened new doors for the franchise. Focusing on how a serial killer secretly maintains her "survivor" fame while trying not to get caught killing future victims would have been a superb idea for a fifth installment. "Scream 4" should have ended after Jill beat herself up and was being carted out of the house through the flashing of the paparazzi. Fade to white. End of film. However, mediocrity reigned supreme, Sidney lived and the whole shebang wound up scraping the bottom of the cinematic barrel.

My Overall Impression of "Scream 4":
This is an inconsequential sequel that exists solely to appease the almighty dollar. Why tarnish a decent legacy for the sake of being greedy? It never works out well in the long run. I guess, to paraphrase a line from the movie (which came from Dewey no less - ugh!), "One generation's classic horror movie is another one's joke." This film is the joke and it is one that fails miserably.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

10

NateJax81Apr 15, 2011

I definitely have to say..speaking as a HUGE fan of the first 3 films that 11 yrs later in Scream 4...i was definitely thoroughly entertained. It was an amazing opening and ending that still has me thinking WOW! I highly recommend this to anyI definitely have to say..speaking as a HUGE fan of the first 3 films that 11 yrs later in Scream 4...i was definitely thoroughly entertained. It was an amazing opening and ending that still has me thinking WOW! I highly recommend this to any horror fan and any fan of the first 3 films...way to go Kevin Williamson and Wes Craven...cant wait for Scream 5 and 6!… Expand

10 of 16 users found this helpful106

All this user's reviews

8

FinnaticJul 10, 2011

Scream 4 recaptures the tone and intent of the first film in this franchise perfectly. All the major players are back and boy, are they in for the ride of their lives! Go see this if you love a good scary movie, but check out the originalScream 4 recaptures the tone and intent of the first film in this franchise perfectly. All the major players are back and boy, are they in for the ride of their lives! Go see this if you love a good scary movie, but check out the original three films first, if you can. A real fanboy (and fangirl) treat here! Careful, the theater is dark. Better take a friend to keep you company. Plop down full price on this one, and be proud.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

4

dnaxmeisterApr 19, 2011

i found scream 4 to be hilarious, with its sudden outbursts and random comments, just adding some blood and guts to it makes it all the more weird. but what made this movie funny is that all the actors constantly try to avoid there inevitablei found scream 4 to be hilarious, with its sudden outbursts and random comments, just adding some blood and guts to it makes it all the more weird. but what made this movie funny is that all the actors constantly try to avoid there inevitable death with their knowledge of scary movies that they've seen. If wes craven and kevin williamson thought this movie was gonna be scary they were far from right. suspencful maybe. scary not close.… Expand

5 of 9 users found this helpful54

All this user's reviews

8

MarcDoyleApr 17, 2011

It's a damned fun movie. Had a little something for everyone - jump-out-of-your-skin moments, fresh commentary on other horror movies and social media obsession, classic characters from the series, and not one, not two, but three openingIt's a damned fun movie. Had a little something for everyone - jump-out-of-your-skin moments, fresh commentary on other horror movies and social media obsession, classic characters from the series, and not one, not two, but three opening "phone" sequences. In my immediate vicinity, there were no less than 4 people hiding their eyes throughout the film, which is always a good sign. Probably the best cast of any Scream film - no offense to Jamie Kennedy.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

SkydukeMay 8, 2011

Wes Craven proves his genius once again, with this excellent "reboot" of the Scream series. This is an excellent slasher movie. It doesn't try to innovate, it incorporates clichÃ©s found in over three decades of horror movies andWes Craven proves his genius once again, with this excellent "reboot" of the Scream series. This is an excellent slasher movie. It doesn't try to innovate, it incorporates clichÃ©s found in over three decades of horror movies and updates them for 2011. Not a 10 obviously, but it will give you a couple of good scares while also making you laugh.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

gemini0577Nov 19, 2011

Scream 4 is a welcome return to the franchise, reuniting old favorites with Ghostface, who is targeting unsuspecting victims in a mad ploy to get to survivor Sydney Prescott. The plot is pretty solid with a few blatant winks to the firstScream 4 is a welcome return to the franchise, reuniting old favorites with Ghostface, who is targeting unsuspecting victims in a mad ploy to get to survivor Sydney Prescott. The plot is pretty solid with a few blatant winks to the first film. The acting is mostly stellar (some hamming-it-up moments detract from the impact of the film in some instances) and the gore does not disapoint. Where does the film go wrong? Well, the opening sequence, in trying to be spectacular, kind of falls flat and turns out to be the weakest opening yet. It tries to take a stab at the ridiculous franchises out there that seem to fall apart as a new installment hits but doesn't take itself seriously enough in the moment, thus rendering it more of a Scary Movie type spoof than an actual slasher flick shocker. Still, the film delivers in thrills. And the pop culture references serve as a fun interlude to all the killing.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

vini1904Aug 14, 2012

One of the best horror movies, comedies and horror mixed in a way unsurpassed. A great script, great performances. No more words, a great movie without taking nor by.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

Trev29Jun 24, 2013

A wonderful exciting movie that took me by surprise. It was so creative and adaptive to this time period and the best Scream yet. I really hope there is another one. It was scary and funny which makes it stand out.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

KivaJun 10, 2013

Scream 4 is a good movie. The masked man was unpredictable who he was, the killings are good and i think it's better than scream 2 and 3. I would happily watch a fifth movie as the fourth was a funny thriller, which was not bad at all actually

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

0

wishmasterJul 19, 2011

The movie inside the movie, inside of the original movie, in conclusion it was **** omg.! not long ago that crap was tremendous, everything, absolutely everything was lousy.

3 of 8 users found this helpful35

All this user's reviews

3

god-amaterasuJun 23, 2012

Scream 4 is one of the worst films I've ever seen: it is not clear if it is serious or a comedy. Indeed, often funny, but simply because it's ridiculous.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

6

KendylKlownfishApr 20, 2011

Scream 4 has its ups and downs -- it is at times both fresh and formulaic -- however, fans of the series will be more than pleased. Pros: Lots of meta humor; likable characters with hilarious dialog; it feels like a classic slasher film.Scream 4 has its ups and downs -- it is at times both fresh and formulaic -- however, fans of the series will be more than pleased. Pros: Lots of meta humor; likable characters with hilarious dialog; it feels like a classic slasher film. Cons: Formulaic; predictable; adds nothing fresh to the series; a hit-or-miss twist.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

3

AfotaiApr 26, 2011

This is postmodernism at its finest, with a pure lack of inspiration, and iteration after iteration.
This movie actually builds upon all the parodies that ever came out for this franchise, and sadly it has lost its old values along with it.This is postmodernism at its finest, with a pure lack of inspiration, and iteration after iteration.
This movie actually builds upon all the parodies that ever came out for this franchise, and sadly it has lost its old values along with it.

Do not waste any money on this movie.… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

0

darktiger898May 26, 2012

This movies plot was terrible how a girl wanted to take Sydney's place and she was behind the whole thing ghost face should be a guy not a girl. .everyone hers a tip this movie is a waste of your time.

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

3

smijatovJan 10, 2012

As the critic Michael O'Sullivan from the Washington Post noted in his review of the film, Scream 4 does not care whether one laughs with it or at it. And I definitely laughed at it. It was one of the most ridiculous attempts at a horror filmAs the critic Michael O'Sullivan from the Washington Post noted in his review of the film, Scream 4 does not care whether one laughs with it or at it. And I definitely laughed at it. It was one of the most ridiculous attempts at a horror film that I have seen. With no scares, and barely a few thrills (but 49 different plot twists to make up for it, unfortunately), Scream 4 just fails at being a horror and turns into a parody of itself and of the franchise it represents. Not remembering most of the previous Scream films, since I watched them a long time ago, I soon enough realised that there should not have been another Scream film in the first place. The desperation of the producers to get some more money out of the died franchise is obvious, when they are trying to "re-invent" the franchise through recycling old material but making it seem "original" and "different." I ended up laughing at most of the film (I guess, at least it was entertaining in that regard), but also found myself palm-slapping myself a number of times because of how poor the screenplay was. It is basically a comedy and has nothing what a horror ought to have. It is a failed attempt to rejuvenate the franchise, which in my eyes, has utterly failed. Hopefully this will be the last of the Scream films.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

1

joreganoApr 16, 2011

a movie empties into emotions
a way of wasting time, all you gave me is shame.
although I could see that were trying to be ridiculous not ridiculous funny
palicula is not afraid to laugh or gender is ridiculous

1 of 7 users found this helpful16

All this user's reviews

0

DGDSNApr 15, 2011

If you like this movie you are probably the worst kind of person. Try reading a book once in a while or actually thinking... but don't hurt yourself.

3 of 22 users found this helpful319

All this user's reviews

3

andisartApr 15, 2011

I was bored for most part, never really scared or terrified and kept thinking where are they going with this script? A lot of missed chances to make this one interesting unfortunately. I hoped this one would be more scary again, bringI was bored for most part, never really scared or terrified and kept thinking where are they going with this script? A lot of missed chances to make this one interesting unfortunately. I hoped this one would be more scary again, bring something new. But it went to go down the funny road instead and also repeat the all-to-familiar self-citing and irony, which I found just lame and uninteresting. It's 2011, Wes Craven... Also I thought the movie wasn't clever like the first or parts of the second. Too many moments where you ask yourself if your intelligence as a viewer is being regarded at all. I would have loved this one to come out better, it's been 10 yrs and it seemed like they might just have had some great new takes on the series. But they didn't deliver that. More of the same old, which was great, even brilliant in part one, but doesn't drag out well in a forth installment. I rank this one as not as bad as the 3rd, but not as good as the 2nd film.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

1

jdmApr 15, 2011

pure comedy plain and simple, not a moment of horror..just the same old lame cliches and stupidity. Besides a decent twist at the end the rest made me laugh

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

6

ZacharyMatsonApr 24, 2011

I thought the first Scream was very good, but as for two and three, it's like they said i this one, "They keep recycling the same **** over and over again..." but I think the fourth redeemed the series. I didn't love this film, but I didn'tI thought the first Scream was very good, but as for two and three, it's like they said i this one, "They keep recycling the same **** over and over again..." but I think the fourth redeemed the series. I didn't love this film, but I didn't hate it at all.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

Scream4LoverApr 17, 2011

WOW! Scream 4 was just another masterpiece of Craven. Wes Craven, and Kevin Williamson prove once again that they are a strong team, and that the horror/comedy genre isn't dead, yet. Scream 4 is full of laughs, scares, and suspense!!!! I loved it!

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

Edward9630Jul 23, 2011

Scream 4 is an alright film. There were very good stab scenes in the film and the story can be interesting at some stages. The problems with this film is the movie trys to be way too funny but it dosent reach it goals and as much as it doesScream 4 is an alright film. There were very good stab scenes in the film and the story can be interesting at some stages. The problems with this film is the movie trys to be way too funny but it dosent reach it goals and as much as it does improve from the third one, it stills dosent reach the goal that 1 and 2 did. I would give this a high rental.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

2

xXRenTyrellXxOct 29, 2011

Really? This is what one of the most acclaimed classic, horror movie series has to offer me? A bunch of teenage girls getting hacked up? It may appeal to other people, (for reasons I don't fully understand) but that is not what I would call aReally? This is what one of the most acclaimed classic, horror movie series has to offer me? A bunch of teenage girls getting hacked up? It may appeal to other people, (for reasons I don't fully understand) but that is not what I would call a good horror movie experience. I realize it's just suppose to be a fun scary movie to take your date on, but that is just to much for my liking. Acting performances were fine. But the whole plot was just stupid.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

4

spadenxDec 7, 2011

The film is pretty terrible up until the last 30 mins then it got rather good. I did enjoy the twist at the end. The acting was horrible through out, the kills were boring and too generic, the entire film just sucked until the twist happensThe film is pretty terrible up until the last 30 mins then it got rather good. I did enjoy the twist at the end. The acting was horrible through out, the kills were boring and too generic, the entire film just sucked until the twist happens then its enjoyable for that part. Sadly though, It doesnt make up for the trash before that.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

WesfanMay 27, 2012

This movie was amassing it was the best scream installment yet and I really hope they make more because they get better and better. But the one thing i didn't like is you never find out what happend to her dad

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

7

BradySmithDec 1, 2013

Funny, meta, and for once actually unpredictable, Scream 4, in my opinion, actually outdoes the original. However, it's still hindered greatly by the fact that it's the fourth in the series, and the fact that horror movies have beenFunny, meta, and for once actually unpredictable, Scream 4, in my opinion, actually outdoes the original. However, it's still hindered greatly by the fact that it's the fourth in the series, and the fact that horror movies have been satirized and spoofed for well over a decade now doesn't help it out much either. There were parts of it that I actually laughed out loud at, and other parts where it actually got me nervous. It wasn't terrifying, but I can live with that. My main complaint is that it takes itself too seriously. It too often just feels like another horror film. Craven directs it confidently, but couldn't he give it a little more style, or make it a little bit more of a spoof? 4 movies in I wish the series would stop trying to mix actual horror with the laughs. I'm not saying to make it like the Scary Movie series, but I feel that a lighter tone would have helped it out. Still, I'm hard pressed to try and recommend any other slasher film over it. I had a decent time with it, but not a great one.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

10

MattCipolla926Jul 13, 2013

I remember seeing this opening night, which I'm happy to say was actually my best theatrical experience I've ever had. Within the first seven minutes the film brings meta-humor and self-deprecation to a new level, pointing out all of theI remember seeing this opening night, which I'm happy to say was actually my best theatrical experience I've ever had. Within the first seven minutes the film brings meta-humor and self-deprecation to a new level, pointing out all of the supposed flaws that anyone could complain about and opening addresses itself with, "It's been done to death... Stick a fork in 1996 already." The dialogue is witty and acerbic the entire time and all feels fresh and modern, which in itself is a huge accomplishment. Characters are completely believable as teens and the acting is actually great, specifically Hayden Panettiere who plays my favorite character: a dry, sardonic and sexy closeted film geek. The brilliantly orchestrated final act discusses modern society's obsession with technology and easy-found fame and the identity of the killer surprised me to no end; even being a die hard fan of the franchise and a cinephile, I didn't guess anything correctly. There are SO many red herrings that make you contemplate if something is too obvious, who was doing what when, and makes you double check yourself in regards to reverse psychology of believing who the killer is. The best part is that all but one of the cliches and tropes that are utilized for satire are subverted and/or openly acknowledged. The script justifies a character's seemingly stupid actions or flips it outright. Everything is shot well with good use of lighting as well as a good orchestral score and the directing is good (pay attention to the increasing corniness of the opening scene). It's actually the best of the series, better than the first with very clever kills and witty satire regarding torture porn, found footage genre films, modern horror, remakes and reboots. And yes, it scared the crap out of me. 9.5/10, incredible, two thumbs up, etc.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

FilmVirtueMar 12, 2014

The 4th scream movie is a definite improvement from the 3rd and this time with several plot twists that force you to watch to the end. I'ts a non-stop cycle of twists that continue all the way up to the end.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

HawkWDSep 28, 2015

Before I become to critical of the film, let me say that Scream 4 did save the series after the disastrous Scream 3 and had its high points. However, between Emma Robert's lackluster acting and the gaping plot holes, Scream 4 certainly didBefore I become to critical of the film, let me say that Scream 4 did save the series after the disastrous Scream 3 and had its high points. However, between Emma Robert's lackluster acting and the gaping plot holes, Scream 4 certainly did not bring the series back to its former glory. Don't get me started on the ridiculous scene where the publicist is killed because there are multiple issues with that on its on. Overall, there are some great moments like when Kirby answers horror movie trivia with the killer, but the movie is plagued with mediocre acting and mediocre writing that make me refuse to score it higher than a 6.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

kyle20ellisMar 26, 2022

By all means it is not as good as the classic original, but it is better than the two sequels before it, the second was worthy, the third while not bad as such was a disappointment. On its own and as a sequel, Scream 4 is terrific. I lovedBy all means it is not as good as the classic original, but it is better than the two sequels before it, the second was worthy, the third while not bad as such was a disappointment. On its own and as a sequel, Scream 4 is terrific. I loved the opening, it was bloody and funny and thankfully the rest of the film lived up of the opening. The production values are of high quality still, and the music and sound effects are as haunting and as unsettling as ever. The script has a number of funny lines too, the scares are genuinely intense, the story is well paced and entertaining, Wes Craven's direction is excellent and the characters are still credible with GhostFace still iconic and effective. The acting is great, Haydn Pannettiere is very good, and those from the previous movies who return turn in good performances as well. All in all, terrific and the best sequel since the original film. 9/10 Bethany Cox… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

Josephgamers65Apr 18, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Scream 4 Is the latest of the scream movies what are out this is a decent Scream movie The cons in this movie is Sidney Gale but Dewey I did not like his character in this movie he just does nothing that his character did he does not really care what Gale said's which really bothered me The killer as Charlie is believable Than Jill as the killer just feels off again as scream 2 Jill should not be the character she really has no reason wow she is jealous that Sidney got all the attention That made no sense to me some of the characters just feel off Sidney does not do whole a lot in this movie like scream 2 Scream 4 is a disappointing reboot of Scream at least they got Gale Right as a character in Scream 4 So yeah scream 4 is a decent scream movie If Jill was not the killer and Dewey Had a better character this would of have been better So I give Scream 4 An C+… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

Sosmooth1982Jan 10, 2023

Sidney is now an author of her stories. She on a book tour. The last stop is home after 10 years. It's that last stop when the killer strikes again. Pretty good movie after a long time. Better then part 3.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

ShiiraApr 29, 2011

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The cinema club leaders of Westboro High are pretty uninformed about the genre they profess to admire, or maybe it's a matter of the two fanboys placing restrictions on what constitutes a horror movie; a matter of tastemaker-sanctioned genre staticness. During a meeting, in which the rules for surviving a horror movie are being dissected, Charlie says, "To be the new version, you know, 2.0? The killer should be filming the murders." With this heedless declaration, John McNaughton's "Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer", and more importantly, "Man Bites Dog"(the original meta-horror movie that meant serious business), goes unacknowledged, especially when Robbie puts in his own two cents, adding that "it's the natural next step in psycho slasher innovation," as if the murderers in "Scream 4" are pioneering a new methodology in the killing business. Benoit Poelvoorde, playing "himself" in the 1992 Belgian production, is the subject of a documentary film that profiles the day-to-day travails of a serial killer. To paraphrase and co-opt Robbie's proclamation in its proper context, "the psycho slasher innovation" of "Man Bites Dog" is how the filmmaker shifts the focus away from the cult of personality surrounding the homicidal maniac and more towards the person he's putting under life-threatening duress, so that the moviegoer identifies with the inevitable victim and not some hillbilly with a chainsaw, or a knife-wielding goalie. Ben doesn't have the sex appeal of an anti-hero; he has no gimmick. With the cameras rolling, this no frills psychopath, at one point, suffocates a young boy in his own bed, the culmination of a home invasion gone awry. The hands that hold the pillow steady over the smothered child's face are ordinary hands, all-too-human ones, without the accoutrements of knives extending from the fingers. The vicarious thrill of harmless bloodlusting people get from watching people die is largely absent, made strange by the film's straight-faced mockumentary form, in which the horror is the end-result of a slaying, and not the creative spectacle(the incident that prompts the arterial spray and all manners of bloodletting) leading up to the latest casualty in Jason, Michael Myers, or Freddy Kreuger's killing spree. The content is self-reflexive. It confronts the moviegoer with this burning question: Why do we like to watch people die in grisly fashion for fun? The "Stab" franchise, the movie series within the movie series, is used in "Scream 4" to exemplify the fandom behind slasher flicks in the form of an impromptu film festival, a "Stab"-athon staged by Robbie and Charlie. Playing to a capacity crowd in a barn house, "Stab" open just like "Scream", but with one significant change in the film-within-the-film adaptation of "The Woodsboro Murders", the Gail Weathers bestselling book that gives the "real-life" account of the Ghostface Killer , whose fictitious handiwork is transformed into non-fiction by "Scream 2". Heather Graham, playing the role of the girl who gets murdered at the outset of "Scream", disrobes in the bathroom, an outright deviation from "actual" events leading up to the crime. To us, the actual moviegoers, the nudity is implied, but to the "Stab" audience, the partygoers at the "Stab"-athon, the suggested nudity from their diegetical perspective is frontal, and gratuitous, since the character Drew Barrymore plays, never endeavors to shower, therefore deconstructing the slasher pic trope of topless nubiles, because the bathroom scene in "Stab" is indeed superfluous, which is proven by the put-upon historicity of the original "Scream". In "Stab", just like many slasher movies of its ilk, the young woman shows us her breasts, then sooner or later, she shows us her blood. "Man Bites Dog" knows the trope well, and is more blunt about the interconnectedness that binds sex and violence together in all its R-rated glory, by replacing the usual display of exhibitionism(or consensual sex) found in most dead teenager movies with gang-rape as the prelude to the woman being murdered. "Man Bites Dog" brings to the foreground the seeming disinterest in sex that is common to all the major figures in the annals of horror cinema. Like "Man Bites Dog", the killer has sex on the brain in "Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer", when Otis sexually assaults the woman that he and the titular character kills(along with her husband and son), and videotapes. These two seminal horror films are real in a way that "Scream" can never be, even with the advantage of the film-within-the-film device. As the Ghostface Killer records his attempted murder of Gail in the hayloft, the juxtaposition between the "true story" and "based on a true story" reveals nary a difference in form and content, especially since the homicidal videographer never shows his true face. He hides behind an iconic mask, a signifer of entertainment, purveyor of cinematic violence.… Expand