|
Warner Home Video |
Release Date:
March 26, 2004
|
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
47
Mixed:
59
Negative:
32
|
Watch Now
| Review this movie |
|
| Check box if your review contains spoilers | 0 characters (5000 max) |
User Reviews
Jan 21, 2014
Wow, this is worse than the first one, there is still **** CGI like the first one, there still horrible acting, and jokes, and it is still a **** movie.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
Jul 6, 2014
This movie makes the first one look good. Did anyone on the set give a sh*t about what they were doing? This movie just plains to be silly, incoherent and pathetically laughable. If you're going to watch this, think 5 times.
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
Mar 7, 2011
This was even worst than the first, they still can't get that classic Scooby Doo feel, the crappy actors, bad jokes, and retarded story make this movie unenjoyable, as a huge fan of Scooby Doo I can't find a reason to recommend this to anyone.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
Jan 19, 2016
Sure, let's ruin Scooby-Doo even more. It's not like they're using them to gain a whole load of money which is once again a bad idea. Not worth giving any Scooby Snack to.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
Jul 6, 2020
“Facepalms”
Though it’s not quite as unbearable as the Chipmunk films and Lillard is once again great as Shaggy, Monsters Unleashed has painfully bad humour, Awful writing, and a little to no effort.
Though it’s not quite as unbearable as the Chipmunk films and Lillard is once again great as Shaggy, Monsters Unleashed has painfully bad humour, Awful writing, and a little to no effort.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
Jul 12, 2020
The casting is good but the rest is a absolute mess made as a quick cash in .
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
