Return to Never Land

Buena Vista Pictures | Release Date: February 15, 2002

6.3	USER SCORE Generally favorable reviews based on 35 Ratings

USER RATING DISTRIBUTION

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Watch Now

Stream On

Buy on

Stream On

Expand

Review this movie

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.

Check box if your review contains spoilers

0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User score By date Most helpful

spollardMar 25, 2014

This movie is made for children and is not well done for general audiences. The magic from the 1953 original is lost. The story is what I find to be most troublesome. If this is a continuation of the first one, shouldn't Peter Pan haveThis movie is made for children and is not well done for general audiences. The magic from the 1953 original is lost. The story is what I find to be most troublesome. If this is a continuation of the first one, shouldn't Peter Pan have Captain Hook's ship as he did steal it from him in the previous movie. Also, the little girl does not believe in fairies although she is staring one right in the face, kind of odd. Also the fact that I like Captain Hook's character a lot more than Peter Pan is not a good thing. In the end the poor animation, poor voices, and poor story all resulted in a terrible movie and a 27.6 out of 100.… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

TheQuietGamerMar 1, 2011

It's not as good as the original, but the plot is really good, and the characters are pretty enjoyable, it was cool seeing Wendy's kid go to Neverland and continue on the story of Peter Pan, but it's pretty upsetting that they replaced theIt's not as good as the original, but the plot is really good, and the characters are pretty enjoyable, it was cool seeing Wendy's kid go to Neverland and continue on the story of Peter Pan, but it's pretty upsetting that they replaced the crocodile with an octopus, I mean an octopus? really? but it's still a good movie from beginning to end.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

MovieGuysMar 19, 2014

Return to Never Land is a cheaply made, underachieving sequel, and is nowhere close to the original in any way. But, I suppose it'll make the little ones happy.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

SimpsonFansAug 20, 2016

This sequel absolutely lives up to the original Peter Pan. The ride ends somewhat fast because of the short length, but it has a good story and animation.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

ZilcellJun 14, 2012

This sequel lives up to the original Peter Pan. The ride ends somewhat fast because of the short length, but it has a good story and animation.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

12hilbkeJul 3, 2013

Despite having some charming moments, this sequel to the Disney classic just can't live up to what made the original such a great animated film to watch.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

kyle20ellisMar 27, 2022

Return To Neverland isn't terrible, but it does fail on many levels, so can't be classed as a good sequel. The animation and the story were the redeeming qualities, but unfortunately the songs and the characters fall flat.

The animation isReturn To Neverland isn't terrible, but it does fail on many levels, so can't be classed as a good sequel. The animation and the story were the redeeming qualities, but unfortunately the songs and the characters fall flat.

The animation is mostly bright and colourful, but falls flat in the dark backgrounds. The story wasn't bad either, trying to keep Hook from getting the treasure and everything. I also liked the war scene, because that was quite interesting on an animation perspective, and brought some intrigue on a contextual level. I was unimpressed by the trailer, but the film itself wasn't bad, but loses the charm about 15 minutes in. I will say it has a great message about cherishing your childhood.

The first problem was that the kidnapping scene took far too long, despite the breathtaking animation of Hook's ship, and I hated the change to Hook. In the original and the criminally underrated TV series Peter Pan and the Pirates, which are both classics, he is complex and vindictive, but here he was manipulative in a negative way, and lacked menace. The best character was Jane, but that isn't saying much, and Peter's new voice was horrible, too bolshy. The songs were terrible and forgettable immediately after you've finished watching the movie, likewise with the dialogue. The main problem was that it isn't a true sequel at all, compared to the first film and the book. And the octopus, why replace the crocodile may I ask?

I'm sorry that this is mostly negative, but Return To Neverland was very disappointing. Though better than the trailer suggested, it is still a pretty charmless film, with a 3/10(Adequate) Bethany Cox… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

JPKDec 12, 2019

Change Of Heart
After a bit of looking back, I now think that Return To Neverland is pretty good.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews