Miramax Films | Release Date: October 1, 1992
8.6
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 956 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
888
Mixed:
40
Negative:
28
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
8
Cameronius_113Aug 11, 2017
Reservoir Dogs was released in 1992 and was directed by Quentin Tarantino in his directorial debut. The film is about a group of strangers who band together for a jewellery heist, however after it goes terribly wrong they take refuge in aReservoir Dogs was released in 1992 and was directed by Quentin Tarantino in his directorial debut. The film is about a group of strangers who band together for a jewellery heist, however after it goes terribly wrong they take refuge in a warehouse whilst they begin to suspect that one of them is an undercover police officer. Because of this being his first film, it really shows throughout the film how ambitious and excited Tarantino was to be making it; the film is full of style and great direction.

To start off with, the film feels very raw and realistic which I loved and nothing feels altered to fit the accustoms of cinema, and I could genuinely believe that all of this stuff happened in real life. It is extremely impressive for an independent film and cleverly made throughout.

Even though the film's cast are known only by colours, they each have a memorable quality for them which makes them feel more like real people; Mr White supports others frequently, Mr Pink only looks out for himself, Mr Blonde is essentially a psychopath and Mr Orange is a newcomer with not much experience. Each cast member gives a great performance, however there are some slight issues with some characters that I'll get onto later.

The film's story is told in a non-linear structure, with the present section of the film taking place entirely within a warehouse. Each character recounts what happened to them and we are shown parts of their backstory leading up to the robbery, as well as a few things that occurred afterwards. The intelligent thing that the film does is never actual show the heist itself as even though by the end of the film most things would be solved, it leaves some mystery still lingering there and makes the film more intriguing throughout rather than just simply showing stuff.

It is clear throughout that Tarantino is a huge fan of classic songs and films, and the inclusions of these references don't overstuff the film in any way and instead makes it more unique and stylish than your average crime film at the time. Music is also cleverly used ironically throughout the film too, as in one scene a man is being tortured in a very brutal manner but due to the happy song playing in the scene it makes you relax and enjoy it, until the moment when the music goes off and you realise what really just happened.

So the setup for the film is absolutely brilliant and it is thoroughly entertaining throughout, however when I look back at the film I realised that not really much happens in it; there's the criminals arguing about what happened, them going to do their business and then the rat is revealed. While I liked the reveal, I found it to happen very out of the blue and I personally thought it would have been much more interesting if the criminals had to piece things like clues together themselves to work out the truth, and due to them each likely having a different perspective it would cause a conflict between them (which is what the film makes). What we received wasn't bad or lazy, I was just hoping for something more intriguing.

I also felt there were a few unnecessary elements to the film. There was one particular character who was rather pointless and he literally has no character in the film, even the poster and the tagline of the film forgot he existed. The fact that he is rather unknown creates a suspicion throughout that he may be the mole, however after we find out that he isn't the mole it makes his character pointless in the end. There is another character in the film who pretty much has the same sort of role as the other one (a McGuffin), but what was different about this character was that he was an amusing person and had some sort of character to him, and it's also clear that the film is aware of his part in the film as in the very first scene he is subtly set up as a non-important character.

Another thing I felt which may have just been me was I thought that the backstory for Mr Orange went on for a bit too long, as it sets up both his character and also the start of the robbery because of his character being the last one whose backstory is shown. These two parts are shown without any cuts in between which felt a bit overlong to me (the film doesn't feel overlong in total length though). However, I may be the only one with that gripe like I said.

As I ended the review with my criticisms, it may sound like I gave the film a mediocre review but overall, I thought that this film was great and the issues I pointed out weren't major but things I felt could've been done slightly better. I had a blast watching the film and I would happily rewatch it any time; it has great performances from the cast, an interesting and intriguing storyline, lots of style and a very entertaining film throughout, however there were one or two things I would change if I was the one who had made the film.

8.3/10
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
DeanomiteFeb 11, 2020
Rewatching, what makes this movie so timeless? i have been studying psychology and all the major types are there, acting exactly according to their profile. First of all, none of them have identities-the first sign of personality disorder.Rewatching, what makes this movie so timeless? i have been studying psychology and all the major types are there, acting exactly according to their profile. First of all, none of them have identities-the first sign of personality disorder. Personality disorders are exaggerated in a work environment. Michael Madsen is a psychopath (no emotion, enjoys hurting others). Steve Buscemi is the sociopath (spreads gossip, disregards boundaries of others to damage relationships). Harvey Keitel is codependent (emotional, concerned more about taking care of others than himself. Tim Roth is introverted narcissist (seeking attention, acting wounded, bragging), Chris Penn is the extroverted narcissist, also called histrionic (over sexualized, flirting). These people interact exactly the way they do in real life, the accuracy of these types is crazy. I have studied psychology nearly a decade to understand these interactions as well as they are portrayed here. Plus there is an acting class built into the movie, that adds so much dimension. The culture of the police has good depth, the culture of the criminals has depth. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
hughes857Dec 19, 2017
A very suspenseful and enticing film that will leave you at the edge of your seat. Beautifully shot and wonderfully acted, this movie is a once in a lifetime cinematic experience. This movie was the beginning of a new generation of sequenceA very suspenseful and enticing film that will leave you at the edge of your seat. Beautifully shot and wonderfully acted, this movie is a once in a lifetime cinematic experience. This movie was the beginning of a new generation of sequence filming. You will not be disappointed when watching this movie. Movies like this and Pulp Fiction shows the transformation of the film industry. A highly acclaimed and majestically created film like this should not be undermined at any time. Tarantino continues to triumph over the industry again and again. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
amheretojudgeJul 28, 2019
Tarantino is letting his teeth sink in on the characters more than the bangs and booms, to a degree that he embodies one.

Reservoir Dogs Tarantino's game of assumption is a pretty standard equation. The writer and director, Quentin
Tarantino is letting his teeth sink in on the characters more than the bangs and booms, to a degree that he embodies one.

Reservoir Dogs

Tarantino's game of assumption is a pretty standard equation. The writer and director, Quentin Tarantino is taking a discussion further than just a suggested idea in a bar. And on his side, before the argument even begins, is a crowd pleasing concept and enticing genre to follow. The film often tends to stay ahead of the game and provokes you, challenges you to be in sync with the storytelling. As a result a lot of time is spent upon placing the assumption, the imagination in your head as a viewer. Let's go through the scene where Mr. Blonde (Michael Madsen) tortures the cop.

At first, the condition, the premise is set by him. It helps you know the tone and endorses the upcoming event with a cautionary warning. And then comes the violence. But the violence isn't gruesome as it is painted and hyped in public opinion. Yes, there is literal blood baths in here, but I have seen much worse cringeworthy eye popping or screeching images. And I insist on its subtlety- if we can call it that- of the violence, is because most of it is left upon your imagination, innuendos are clear and crisp and hence the "necessary" clause goes out of the window.

Maybe, that's why Madsen is shown leaving the music behind and come back to it, grooving as he yells out his final threat. That part, that dance, is the style that defines Tarantino's cinema. Before a shock is revealed which then turns itself into an ethical dilemma, what he is showcasing as a part of narrative is the style that we actually remember him and his films for. Reservoir Dogs is a flashy pop culture cinema, just like the conversations that it is brimming with, grounded by an eye on mythological creatures.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
FilipeNetoMay 28, 2020
I will start this review by making a warning that I give whenever I dedicate myself to a film directed by Quentin Tarantino: I am not an admirer of this director. On the contrary. I'm even quite critical about his work. Not even Jesus ChristI will start this review by making a warning that I give whenever I dedicate myself to a film directed by Quentin Tarantino: I am not an admirer of this director. On the contrary. I'm even quite critical about his work. Not even Jesus Christ pleased everyone, did He? However, from this filmmaker's long list of works, this film is one of the ones I liked the most, I must confess.

The film is based on the failed attempt to rob a jeweler, in order to steal a load of diamonds. The gang is highly professional and was hired by a boss who is superior to everyone. The degree of professionalism and commitment of the thieves reaches the point of not even knowing each other's names, using only nicknames created for the purpose. However, the failure revealed that one of the elements is actually a police informant. What remains is to find out which of the surviving elements is that informer.

Some say that this film is very violent. I honestly don't agree. There are a lot of films out there that manage to be much harder to see than this, and I am thinking, for example of the long lists of horror gore ("Hostel", "Saw"). In any case, it is a movie for adults, in which Tarantino shows that he is very good when he does not sacrifice everything that makes a film work in favor of the look, style and technique. Superbly done and well written, it tells a story with logic and coherence.

The cast is excellent, and combines several big names like Harvey Keitel, Tim Roth, Michael Madsen, Chris Penn, Steve Buscemi, Lawrence Tierney and Tarantino himself. I would personally highlight the performances of Keitel, Buscemi, Roth and, above all, Tierney for their quality. Technically, it is a discreet film, which almost clashes if we look at Tarantino's stylized and very visual films. Perhaps this is due to the mere fact that this film was the first major work in the director's career. Cheap to produce, as befits a film made outside the big studios, everything takes place in a restricted group of scenarios and there are few exterior scenes or effects, being a film based on dialogues and the interpersonal relationships of the various characters. Even the blood looked fake, actually.

This film is proof that it is not necessary to abuse stylization in cinema to make good films. Just having good actors, knowing how to direct them and telling a good story.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Arlene123Sep 6, 2018
Mediocre. It has some good acting but overall, nothing special. A bit overrated. I don't understand why some people go crazy with movies like this. All 80's and 90's gangster movies are highly overrated. Tarantino can do better than that.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
OnaskOct 6, 2018
El verdadero boom de una joven promesa. Con Reservoir Dogs, Quentin Tarantino estableció lo que sería su propio estilo de cine. Con poco más que 1 millón de dólares de presupuesto y una mente brillante, Tarantino asentó un nuevo concepto enEl verdadero boom de una joven promesa. Con Reservoir Dogs, Quentin Tarantino estableció lo que sería su propio estilo de cine. Con poco más que 1 millón de dólares de presupuesto y una mente brillante, Tarantino asentó un nuevo concepto en cuanto al género de gángsters. Un elenco muy bueno, una presentación de personajes sensacionales en un entorno hostil, donde no ves nada de lo que crees que vas a ver y sólo el más inteligente es el que gana.

Se echa en falta un desarrollo más profundo del Señor Marrón y del Señor Azul, pero supongo que tampoco hace falta. Muy recomendada.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
jonslowDec 11, 2018
Imported rating from tomato rotten site but I lost my review as Thai language became unreadable text. Some of the movies I totally forgot the story. This is why I comment this. I need to comment this because it won't record my watched-list ifImported rating from tomato rotten site but I lost my review as Thai language became unreadable text. Some of the movies I totally forgot the story. This is why I comment this. I need to comment this because it won't record my watched-list if I just rate. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Filmix16Apr 4, 2020
Scènario astucieux pour un premier film. J’ai bien aimer le fait de fair le des scènes qui ne ce suive pas. Les dialogues son très intéligent et pourtant simple. Les acteur son très intéressent et la réalisation est très énergique.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
RENZOSEGURAApr 16, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Who was the Reservoir Dog?Probably everybody was but there is someone who fits better in that characterization.
I’ve watched this movie more than 5 times, and I just saw it tonight, and these time I finally understand something different and that’s why I am writing this. I know that critics used to focus on general stuff but, I rather focus on a specific character.
One of the first scenes shows “Mr. Orange” bleeding and being assisted by Mr. White, and it’s clear that something went really wrong, after the first dialogs we know that they were robbing a company and they used fake names to refer to each other.
The plot of the whole movie asks: “what marvelous event happened at the company or who was the amazing friend that sets them up?” In that intrigue situation, Mr. White played a major role, who was blinded by himself, during the tragic scene, by his own perception of what had happened (as I explain in the further paragraphs).
Mr. White is definitely a man who put his shoes into another person as it describes it on the first scene: talking about waitress and her realities how they have to live the day to day in order to subsist and showing us how he cares about these minorities and maybe feeling responsible to do something, he is also concern in some way about minorities problems (when talking black women being treated by his black partners). And for that, there is a big probability that, he is a responsible person, a team member and maybe a good mentor. That makes us empathize really quickly because of his human nature (as the movie achieves really great, intentionally definitely).
And that characteristic is really intrigue because with this kind of thinking it should be hard to murder or to damage someone, so probably he just do his job to prejudice the opposite of who he cares, not minorities in other words wealthy/powerful people. So, probably, there is some personal issues related to not minorities because he understands people problems and that is really important.
When Mr. Orange was shot, the first reaction of Mr. White is compassion about his comrade, but then he shows us that he felt guilty about his comrade being injured as he explained to Mr. Pink. And that minor detail is which blinds Mr. White the whole situation until his dead, the guilt. He could not understand how someone who protects and who he could seem as a pupil In order to make him part of the team could be a rat. And this self-inner definition of Mr. White is covered with the responsibility of the damage made to his pupil. Because how he could be responsible about an injured kid when in his head he should be protecting these minorities. Furthermore, thinking about his pupil as a rat, is in some way against his own values ((loyalty and protectiveness), identity and who he really is.
With all these reasoning inside Mr. White head, he don’t understand that the rat was Mr. Orange even though logically speaking there were no more option of who could be the rat. And that started in one of the last scenes, when Mr. Orange killed Mr. Blonde, and he argues and blame Mr. Blonde for act psychotic. Then Mr. White instantly supported his comrade, because Mr. Blonde cannot understand people feelings, cannot feel responsible about someone, because he was a sociopath which is the total opposite of Mr. White’s believes. And with that in mind, Mr. White made his emotional decision to believe the kid (as he sees him) and entered in a really rough discussion with Joe and his son, putting his own life in really danger in order to save his own identity. 30 seconds later, Mr. White killed Joe, an old friend, In order to be loyal to his own ideals.
Thinking about this character made me wonder how he ended up in that kind of job, even though if it is possible as a human being. Continuing … Before the cops appearance , Mr. Orange confess that he Is the undercover cop. In that moment Mr. White made a moan with much distress and realize that his own reasoning played against him.
And it’s because Mr. White acted very emotional, which blinded to see clearly the whole situation in a more logical way. Probably the reason is because he had fidelity, he seemed like a mentor, a good friend, he is definitely affectionate and protective of people who he cares, and more than anything, he was naïve and loyal or in 2 words a Reservoir Dog.
I know that there had been some conjunctions about the character reasoning, but when something explains the reasoning behind Mr. White actions and seems logical make you want to believe it.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
erick_tommo99Apr 4, 2020
For being the first film of Tarantino, is not bad, but I would like to know more of each character.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
FilmanwaltDec 17, 2020
Classic Tarantino films, convincing acting and strong dialogues just don't need it anymore.

One of my all time favorites. If you don't know this film yet, you should watch it immediately.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
ehuismanApr 17, 2020
Impossible to watch objectively after knowing what Tarentino went on to create. Reservoir Dogs' raw, graphic, anti-stylistic approach seems so familiar to viewers who have embraced his oeuvre, that the film almost feels cliché in retrospect.Impossible to watch objectively after knowing what Tarentino went on to create. Reservoir Dogs' raw, graphic, anti-stylistic approach seems so familiar to viewers who have embraced his oeuvre, that the film almost feels cliché in retrospect. Only when you remember its release year, you realize what precedent it set for future decades to come. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
DogeGamer2015May 2, 2021
Es una película con mucho estilo; la trama es buena, los actores son excelentes y la banda sonora es memorable; es mi película favorita de Quentin Tarantino y la recomiendo.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Cementer200Sep 21, 2020
Reservoir Dogs is a near perfect movie. The plot is great and well excecated.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
geewahDec 20, 2020
The personalised style of Tarantino in both his direction and storytelling shine in this low budget crime drama.
A classic.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Sweeney-ToddJan 1, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The dialogue and acting is absolutely legendary. You really feel like you can join in on the conversation. The story telling was amazing. The only reason it didn’t get a 9 or even a 10 is because I would’ve like to see the entire heist Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
AJ_13Jan 11, 2021
One of the most iconic movie beginnings and casts ever. It's so impressive that this was Tarantino's first movie
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
MrIslamicFeb 19, 2021
It's a great movie, not Tarantinos best (I still think Pulp Fiction is) I like how the movie plays out as you learn more about the characters and the job they are going to pull off. The movie has a great ending.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
marcoocabaaFeb 13, 2021
Espectacular historia y simple fotografía perfecta para fans de tarantino. Quizás falta más acción o simplemente más chica pero para mí es perfecta
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
FilmFlickCriticMay 5, 2021
The master of dialogue Tarantino always hits a home run. This film smashes it out of the park when it comes to characters you can get invested in without much back story or screen time for the ones that dont get much. The cast itself isThe master of dialogue Tarantino always hits a home run. This film smashes it out of the park when it comes to characters you can get invested in without much back story or screen time for the ones that dont get much. The cast itself is definitely a plus doing fantastic with there performances. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
SoldatoAug 12, 2021
I heard a lot of praise about this movie, but just can't understand why it's so well received. The movie is long, drawn out, and almost intentionally low budget. Simply stated, the ending was just terrible. Like I wasted my time watching it.I heard a lot of praise about this movie, but just can't understand why it's so well received. The movie is long, drawn out, and almost intentionally low budget. Simply stated, the ending was just terrible. Like I wasted my time watching it. Nothing about this movie kept me wanting to watch it, and there's nothing that hasn't been done better in another film. Take another robbery movie, like "Heat," for example. Better soundtrack, better cast, a better tension building story without anything important left out due to low budget constraints, (Tarantino couldn't even afford an actual robbery scene in this movie) better character development and presentation, better action, memorable dialogue that fit into the story very well, and had purpose. Scenes that were necessary for the plot and understanding the characters better and what drives the characters aside from "I want money and I'm angry/mentally ill." Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
SAB11Sep 8, 2021
great film for the first hour, but then it starts to get boring (especially with that mr. orange character).
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
NickTheCritickNov 3, 2021
This is an impressive debut by Tarantino and tough this movie feels very derivative from Chinese action movie it is full of hilarious moments and funny explosions of grotesque violence. This movie deserves to be a cult.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
mcleanman36Nov 29, 2021
Tarantino's film here is hands down one of if not the best film he has made in his career. If you want to know what this director is capable of then this is a movie you need to watch.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
MoviesaregreatNov 29, 2021
I had only heard good things about this movie but had no idea what was it all about. Definitely a special film, depicts very human characters and is entertertaining from start to finish. You never know what's going to happen next.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
JJ2FAS4UDec 29, 2021
----------------------------------8.4/10-----------------------------------
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Furry_k1llerFeb 19, 2022
La acabo de ver y me ha parecido que ha estado muy bien, Tarantino pudo manejar muy bien el millón y medio de dólares y los personajes están muy bien representados, también la historia no lineal lo hace mucho más interesante.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
SuperbaDMIkeJun 15, 2022
The first Quentin Tarantino film is a great movie with storytelling and directing.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
TeddoesreviewsAug 22, 2023
If this movie isn't proof we need a live action among us movie, I don't know what is. When the imposter is sussy pam pam pam pam pam pam pam, pararam. Dun dun.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
JimmyReviewsMar 17, 2023
7.9
A blast of a movie that is extremely well choreographed and just a real ride. Possibly the best action I’ve seen in a long time.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews