Redacted
Magnolia Pictures | Release Date: November 16, 2007
4.9
USER SCORE
Mixed or average reviews based on 68 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
30
Mixed:
8
Negative:
30
Watch Now
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
7
JackGMar 7, 2008
The movie itself is based on the true events of mahmudiyah killing in Iraq where a group of US soldiers raped a 14 year old girl, burned her body, and murdered her family. They all kept their mouths shut until one of the men told a The movie itself is based on the true events of mahmudiyah killing in Iraq where a group of US soldiers raped a 14 year old girl, burned her body, and murdered her family. They all kept their mouths shut until one of the men told a psychiatrist. Months later 2 soldiers from the same platoon were abducted/tortured/murdered in an act of revenge, the reasons as to why were not made public until months after the kidnappings. The movie stays pretty close to the facts. It does shine a negative light on the American invasion of Iraq but it is also a film about a gang rape and murder of a 14 year old and her family. I thought it was a pretty good movie overall, the special effects, locations, and props used were very good. The acting may have seemed a little cheesy a couple times, but this movie is about getting the story out more than anything. If this movie makes you mad at the filmmakers, then you really need to open your eyes at the bigger picture.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
ChadS.Feb 21, 2008
An internet slam poetess self-aggrandizingly vociferates about Hollywood's uneven depiction of American and Third World lives, in which a film like "Casualties of War" would be an exception to the rule, because it forces an audience to An internet slam poetess self-aggrandizingly vociferates about Hollywood's uneven depiction of American and Third World lives, in which a film like "Casualties of War" would be an exception to the rule, because it forces an audience to face the dissonant music of war; that the soldiers, "our boys", we see in the military recruitment videos nothing but mere end-products of wishful thinking. Like the underrated 1989 film starring Michael J. Fox & Sean Penn, American soldiers rape and kill a girl in "Redacted", a no-holds barred film that indicts everybody from filmmakers(even himself, he who directed "Casualties of War") to journalists, as profiteers of other people's misery and suffering. The faux-documentary, the film within the film, shows us how the media, not only soldiers, occupy a military state and act as collaborators of death. Salazar(Izzy Diaz) shoots his "war diary" to get into film school; the French documentarians shoot their film(judging by their flagrant use of artistry; the ants taking down the scorpion) to gain entrance into film festivals and win awards. When a young Iraqi girl's body is delved into by an American soldier's hands at checkpoint, the man behind the camera should turn it off, walk into that private holding room, and separate that marine from the nubile. It's more important to the filmmaker that he catch an American soldier behaving badly than being a decent human being. "Redacted" deconstructs the documentary film. To quote director Francis Ford Coppola when asked by a reporter about "Apocalypse Now" at the 1979 Cannes Film Festival, "This is Vietnam..."… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
PhilPJun 1, 2008
I'm as liberal and anti-war (this one) as you can get. The movie simply sucks. You guys ought to focus on that. I haven't seen such a poorly acted or scripted piece of crap since Point Break. Horribly done in every way. If somebody I'm as liberal and anti-war (this one) as you can get. The movie simply sucks. You guys ought to focus on that. I haven't seen such a poorly acted or scripted piece of crap since Point Break. Horribly done in every way. If somebody wants t make a good movie about this incident, I'm all for it.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
MannyR.Jun 3, 2008
Really should not have been released in theaters. However, it is solid made for TV material. The cast, for the most part, is horrible but they are supposed to be. You will never see these actors again save for one perhaps, the Blix Really should not have been released in theaters. However, it is solid made for TV material. The cast, for the most part, is horrible but they are supposed to be. You will never see these actors again save for one perhaps, the Blix character. Anyhow, it does represent the insanity and truth of the Iraq war well and what sends it over the top are the refugee interviews included with the DVD. For those giving it zeroes based on its 'propaganda', I would suggest that it is you who are completely and utterly brain-washed. One listen to Winter Soldier or Dar Jamaal's site or alternative news should correct that. It isn't a technical marvel but it is thought-provoking and does attempt to convey truth.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
EdwinNJun 30, 2009
Excellent reconstruction of a disgraceful act,Brian De Palma's Redacted is a shocking,saddening and absorbing portrayal of American soliders in Iraq. Just like in his precedent masterpiece,"The Casualties of War", De Palma films Excellent reconstruction of a disgraceful act,Brian De Palma's Redacted is a shocking,saddening and absorbing portrayal of American soliders in Iraq. Just like in his precedent masterpiece,"The Casualties of War", De Palma films soldiers in a way nobody ever could,in a cinema-verite approach that reminds Peter Watkins 70s flicks like "The War Game" or some of Watakamatsu's more abstract features about the Japanese army. "Redacted" also posesses visual and technical advances, with ambivalent camera movements and masterful editing with dual shots and different types of views(in the narrative sense of way).Influences are heavy, but in a positive way,not in a Quentin Tarantino way:Watkins,Costa-Gavras or even early Godard(This films presents diverse similitudes to Le Petit Soldat).It floats between fiction and reality, between documentary and stylish cinema,and remind us of the atrocities of the Iraqi war with a powerful touch: This is triple the shock, a lot more than lesser documentaries such as "Iraq in Fragments" or "Taxi to the Dark Side".Chapeau,Mr. De Palma, for your work has been as rich on the outside,than on the inside. Style and substance grandeur never felt better.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
RAug 3, 2009
Isn't modern-day cinema great? Steven Spielberg can make a movie like "Saving Private Ryan" that not only shows the horrific realities of war, but also shows the Americans as the good guys. I've seen "Saving Private Ryan" be called Isn't modern-day cinema great? Steven Spielberg can make a movie like "Saving Private Ryan" that not only shows the horrific realities of war, but also shows the Americans as the good guys. I've seen "Saving Private Ryan" be called "biased" simply because the real bad guys, the Nazi soldiers, are portrayed as, guess what, the bad guys. But when a movie like "Redacted" is released, the far left nut jobs who hate America simply because its the latest fad hail it as a cinematic masterpiece because it shows the American troops as the good guys. Those three soldiers disgraced themselves and their country and are now rightfully rotting away in prison. However, this de Palma takes the heinous actions of just three individuals and makes them seem like the commonplace activities of the brace men and women overseas. He exploited a tragedy solely so he could push the leftist agenda of antagonizing the soldiers who have fought and died to give him the right to make this movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
equality7-2521Nov 26, 2007
Just saw this at Sunset & Cresent Heights. Not sure why only one showing per night... at 9:50PM. I think even Laemmle theaters is afraid of the film. Well, I'm in awe of Brian DePalma. I tip my hat to him. Ranks among his best, right Just saw this at Sunset & Cresent Heights. Not sure why only one showing per night... at 9:50PM. I think even Laemmle theaters is afraid of the film. Well, I'm in awe of Brian DePalma. I tip my hat to him. Ranks among his best, right alongside "Blow Out", "Casualties of War", "Carrie", "Sisters", and what was that underrated flick with Rebecca Romain - she played twins? Anyway, even if you're a not a DePalma fan, you'll get to see what the American media refuses to show us. THIS IS WHAT IT'S REALLY LIKE, PEOPLE! Not only is it a well crafted film, it has something to say!! It wants YOU to WAKE UP!! So a couple of human interest stories got through the corp. and gov't filtered media: Abu Ghraib and the rape of a teenage Iraqi girl by U.S. military personnel... I wonder what else we've been missing. I saw the 16 minute press conference on YouTube, that's what compelled me to drive over and check it out. BTW, most of the reviewers posting on here are merely lemming disciples of FOX News and B. O'Reilly. Posting reviews about a film they haven't seen. Sad.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
JimC.Dec 4, 2007
Although I've given this film a "5" (generally the critical consensus at this point), I have to admit I haven't yet seen it...so I am abstaining from giving "my" opinion on this film. However, I wanted to post anyway because Although I've given this film a "5" (generally the critical consensus at this point), I have to admit I haven't yet seen it...so I am abstaining from giving "my" opinion on this film. However, I wanted to post anyway because it's plainly obvious that nearly every "0" review (including the two longest comments!) hasn't seen it either. Look, I have no problem with calling a spade a spade. If this film is poorly made, if it presents an unrealistic view of American soldiers in Iraq, then I'm ALL FOR condemning it as trash. My problem is when people who obviously have a political axe to grind come on here and pillory this film without even having seen it. To these people, it wouldn't matter if every critic in the nation gave it a 10, they'd STILL attack it as "un-American", "Anti-soldier", and every other insult you could think of...without even seeing it!!! This has got to stop, and I hope those who are genuinely thinking of seeing this film make up their minds based on PROFESSIONAL CRITICS rather than the Jane T's and Josh C's of the world. Take your ideology someplace else, this is a FILM site...it's for people who WATCH the movies and THEN offer opinions. Thank you.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
RogerC.Nov 16, 2007
A passionate 21st century anti-war movie. It's like "Casualties of War" in theme: war creates war criminals. But it's very up-to-date technically. We no longer believe in the third-person omniscient camera. Now we wamt to know A passionate 21st century anti-war movie. It's like "Casualties of War" in theme: war creates war criminals. But it's very up-to-date technically. We no longer believe in the third-person omniscient camera. Now we wamt to know who's holding the camera and why and how. So we see the video from the aspiring film student, the French documentary, the Arab TV station, the video blog for Iraq spouses, the exclusive footage for embedded Americam journalists, the Arab website, the terrorist video, the home movie of the returned veteran etc. DePalma is reminding us of how we get our information. But, when you reconstruct all these pieces, you get back to the same message. War is brutal and brutalizing.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
TedM.Nov 18, 2007
Neocons will hate it? Hardly. Neocons won't see it. Frankly, Liberals won't see it either. 2 of my liberal friends started watching it on HDNet on Thursday night and were bored to death before the first hour concluded. That's Neocons will hate it? Hardly. Neocons won't see it. Frankly, Liberals won't see it either. 2 of my liberal friends started watching it on HDNet on Thursday night and were bored to death before the first hour concluded. That's the biggest sin in moving-making. Don't bore your audience. What a pathetic Friday showing, by the way. The movie didn't even register at Boxofficemojo. Why the Landmark in LA would waste a screen on this pity party is beyond me.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
MatthewFNov 19, 2007
Dreadfully boring, poorly acted, and hateful and bigoted in its design. Arguably the worst film of the year and easily the nadir of DePalma's career. Even for propaganda, it's trash. Save your $9.50 and give it to a charity.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
MCNov 24, 2007
Someone just trying to make a name for themselves and hasn't made a movies worth watching in years.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
JamesR.Nov 20, 2007
How about a movie showing AQs beheading of children, Brian, ever thought of making that? Between this and Scarface you have a nice little body count on your hands. Oh yeah, the movie sucked by the way.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
DavidANov 29, 2007
Brian De Palma's "Redacted" argues that the horrors of the Iraq war are being kept from us by inept or venal news media and the government's propaganda machine. That's a tenable premise for a provocative documentary; the Brian De Palma's "Redacted" argues that the horrors of the Iraq war are being kept from us by inept or venal news media and the government's propaganda machine. That's a tenable premise for a provocative documentary; the horrors of every war elude description, and Mr. De Palma is clearly desperate to get a purchase on the chaotic nature of this one. But his film isn't a documentary. It's a work of propaganda in its turn, a digitally photographed meditation on our media-saturated age in which our men in uniform, like the news crews that cover them, create their own realities by shooting digital video of their exploits. The film's core is a speculative and utterly unconvincing reconstruction of an incident that reportedly involved, among many horrors, the rape and savage killing of a 14-year-old Iraqi girl by members of a U.S. army squad. The Americans are portrayed with varying degrees of loathsomeness, but there's not much variety in the film. It's all an awful aberration. Why not make a film about the many rapes of Iraqi women by their fellow Muslims? Or about how many U.S. troops have saved countless women from the mass raping of Uday and Qusay Hussein or the rapes by their fighting Sunni and Shi'ite co-religionists? Well, DePalma would never do movies on those things. Because, hey, they aren't anti-American. And that would portray the Muslims, not American troops, in a bad light. And we can't have that in Hollywood.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
MichaelM.Dec 1, 2007
I snuck in after another movie got out, Watched about 20 minutes got tired of it fast and left. There was 3 people in the theater when I left.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
Davidd.Dec 4, 2007
I couldn't have said it any better Jason! What a piece of trash!!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
MartinF.Feb 19, 2008
The Americans hate the fact that the world hates them. Their propaganda machine is powerless against one thing: truth. Only simple truth distinguishes ugly from the pure. Likewise, users and critics didn't hesitate to show their The Americans hate the fact that the world hates them. Their propaganda machine is powerless against one thing: truth. Only simple truth distinguishes ugly from the pure. Likewise, users and critics didn't hesitate to show their ugliness and beauty with their ratings here, as if they can bend the truth in any way.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
SeanFFeb 21, 2008
Not as good or as bad as most say. An interesting/controversial look at what U.S. troops are accomplishing in Iraq. I don't see why some have branded this movie unpatriotic. If we don't think about things like this, how can we Not as good or as bad as most say. An interesting/controversial look at what U.S. troops are accomplishing in Iraq. I don't see why some have branded this movie unpatriotic. If we don't think about things like this, how can we learn from the mistakes of history, and improve our actions in the world in the future?… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
JadeKMar 14, 2008
It's important that someone portrays what is really happening. A must see for the whole family!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
robsApr 19, 2008
The reason the world hates the U.S. is because of dishonest movies like this one made by the blame America first crowd.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
R.LopezNov 15, 2007
Psuedo-documentary whose only purpose is to advance the idea that US soldiers in Iraq are beasts. DePalma should be tarred and feathered. If it were 1944 and FDR was president, that is exactly what would happen.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
JasonS.Nov 16, 2007
Hateful anti-war propaganda.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
MarcS.Nov 16, 2007
The neocons will hate it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
JoshHarveyNov 16, 2007
Bad from start to finish. If you loath America you may like this movie. For anyone else you will just be relieved when it's over.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
PhillipP.Nov 17, 2007
Strident left-wing hate made all the more irritating by the holier than thou pretentiousness of DePalma. Ironic coming from a man who's made a living making pseudo-pornos of women being slaughtered.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
EtainPNov 18, 2007
Are you a hardcore leftist who wakes up every morning seething with hatred towards Chimpy McHitler? Well you'll probably hate this movie too. It may be a leftist propaganda movie, but its an incredibly poorly made leftist propaganda Are you a hardcore leftist who wakes up every morning seething with hatred towards Chimpy McHitler? Well you'll probably hate this movie too. It may be a leftist propaganda movie, but its an incredibly poorly made leftist propaganda movie. Sorry.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
ShawnNov 21, 2007
This isn't anti-war, its anti-american.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
JaneTNov 21, 2007
This film is just great, isn't it? We have about 200,000 men and women presently in combat zones, and far-left Hollywood loons want to denigrate the country..The film is based on a real-life event that has resulted in three soldiers This film is just great, isn't it? We have about 200,000 men and women presently in combat zones, and far-left Hollywood loons want to denigrate the country..The film is based on a real-life event that has resulted in three soldiers being tried, convicted, and sent to prison for life. Yet DePalma wants the world to see this horror in living color. He wants this for political reasons, as he freely admits. Speaking before journalists in Italy, DePalma said: "The movie is an attempt to bring to reality what's happening in Iraq to the American people ... the pictures are what will stop the war." Here's how stupid that statement is: Overwhelmingly, American forces in Iraq have behaved with restraint and are trying to protect Iraqi civilians from terrorists who blow up women and children. That is the reality, pal. Your movie takes the exception and attempts to make it the rule. Not only that, but "Redacted" will play around the world and may well incite young Muslim men, already steeped in hatred toward America and the west, to act on their hatred. If just one of those men straps on a bomb vest and murders people, that is on Brian DePalma. My question is, why make a film like this? Most people will avoid it; who wants to see that kind of stuff? It definitely smears the military, and may even put our forces in physical danger. Why do this? In the summer of 1942, the Office of War Information, set up by President Franklin Roosevelt, censored American films which depicted scenes that might be used as "enemy propaganda." Few in Hollywood objected to the so-called "Production Code." The liberal icon, FDR, understood that war is so gruesome and chaotic that no civilian population could absorb it visually and still remain upbeat and committed to victory. Imagine seeing live shots of the D-Day invasion or the horror of Iwo Jima. Even during the Vietnam War, Hollywood did not examine the terrible conflict on film. It was only after the war had ended that you had movies like "The Deer Hunter" and "Apocalypse Now." But things have changed drastically in America. Today, it is chic among some in the entertainment industry to bash America and put it in a harsh light... even while Americans are dying overseas. It's freedom of expression, they say. Well, just because you have the right to do something, doesn't make it right. Fair-minded Americans should realize that in any war, mistakes will be made; horrifying things like Abu Ghraib will happen. These things need to be dealt with, but not exploited for political gain. The American military is doing important, noble work. Brian DePalma and the others who back him should be ashamed. They are hurting their own country.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
paulhNov 20, 2007
A very brave movie interestingly told. It is not anti-american:rather against the american presence in iraq and cant be called leftist in any degree.the montage sequence of photos at the end is incredibly powerful. A thoroughly modern piece A very brave movie interestingly told. It is not anti-american:rather against the american presence in iraq and cant be called leftist in any degree.the montage sequence of photos at the end is incredibly powerful. A thoroughly modern piece of film-making and de palma deserved his award at venice. For those who are angry at this movie remember that it is based on real events.in the end it does not make one angry but sad.this movie of course will get savaged in the states but for those interested it is definitely worth checking out. Dont expect saving private ryan however.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
JasonSNov 22, 2007
Liberals and terrorists will love it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
DogSoldierOct 19, 2008
To all the Fascist that gave the film a 0:The check point in your mind has been over run. Nothing,not 7 years of occupation, will win the hearts and minds of this "Axis of Evil", "WMD threat to us", country. Reminds me of Nam 1967/8. And To all the Fascist that gave the film a 0:The check point in your mind has been over run. Nothing,not 7 years of occupation, will win the hearts and minds of this "Axis of Evil", "WMD threat to us", country. Reminds me of Nam 1967/8. And now,long after 11years war,58,000 dead and I can buy quality Vietnamese merchandise at many superstores throughout the US. Its not politics,its economics and I sure hope we get a good OIL deal. I mean we EARNED it, right FASCISTS scum ?… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
jFeb 12, 2008
Powerful film, generally it is believably done, but there are a couple of scenes that don't ring true. A compelling piece of filmmaking, gritty and realistically filmed. The acting is fair. I have to give credit to director Brian de Powerful film, generally it is believably done, but there are a couple of scenes that don't ring true. A compelling piece of filmmaking, gritty and realistically filmed. The acting is fair. I have to give credit to director Brian de Palma for at least trying something different.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
LasloO.Nov 16, 2007
Pure garbage.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
JoshCNov 21, 2007
Just in time for Thanksgiving, the vile movie "Redacted" is opening in a few theatres this week. The film, financed by billionaire Mark Cuban and directed by far-left bomb thrower Brian DePalma, features drunken American soldiers in Iraq Just in time for Thanksgiving, the vile movie "Redacted" is opening in a few theatres this week. The film, financed by billionaire Mark Cuban and directed by far-left bomb thrower Brian DePalma, features drunken American soldiers in Iraq raping and murdering a 14-year-old girl and then slaughtering her family. There isn't any doubt in my mind that film like this will be displayed prominently on jihadi websites, and will be used as a recruiting tool by terrorists. No doubt. Both DePalma and Cuban are unrepentant and apparently could not care less about putting U.S. troops in even more danger. Cuban opines that it is wrong to condemn the film without seeing it, but that's incredible nonsense. No one denies the movie puts American soldiers in the worst light possible. Saying you can't condemn 'Redacted' without seeing it is like saying you can't condemn crystal meth without taking it. So what's to be done here? In a free society, Mark Cuban is entitled to make this despicable movie. Our military people have fought and died to give him that right. Isn't that ironic? Cuban uses his freedom and his money, made in America, to put our troops at further risk. How does the guy live with himself? This isn't about the Iraq war or the war on terror. This is about fellow citizens. Even during the ultra-contentious Vietnam conflict, Hollywood didn't make films that aided the enemy. Jane Fonda made a personal appearance in North Vietnam that did that, and she is still paying for it to this day. Mark Cuban owns the Dallas Maverick basketball team and has been seen gyrating on TV's "Dancing With the Stars." While Cuban is doing the cha-cha, almost 200,000 brave Americans are on far-away battlegrounds. Picture the image of Cuban dancing around juxtaposed with scenes of the hardship our troops face everyday. Sounds like it would make an interesting movie sequence, don't you think? There comes a time when good people must make a stand, and this is one of those times. Cuban and DePalma have done a bad thing; they have made life even harder for our troops. There is no excuse for "Redacted." The incident is based on a true story, but those who committed the crimes are in prison for life. You don't celebrate this kind of aberration with a movie… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
AndrewTNov 26, 2007
Total anti-military/anti-American trash. liberals and terrorists will love it. i just wish it was in print, so at least I could wipe my a.s with it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
CarlCDec 13, 2007
Just horrible to watch and directed by someone that is past his prime and really needs to retire.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
PeterF.Dec 14, 2007
An important contribution to recognizing the hidden costs of our illegal invasion.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
PeterPDec 18, 2007
This movie is great, stop complaining
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
AimenfzJun 18, 2019
The story is based on the Mahmudiyah rape and killings from 2006. It takes a pseudo docu-drama style and dramatizes the tragic events, all the while shedding light on the attempted cover up and subsequent investigation.

It can be a littleThe story is based on the Mahmudiyah rape and killings from 2006. It takes a pseudo docu-drama style and dramatizes the tragic events, all the while shedding light on the attempted cover up and subsequent investigation.

It can be a little hard to watch but it reveals the recent war culture and all that can and does go wrong when US soldiers invade foreign countries without any respect, regard, or understanding of the local cultures.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
BroyaxApr 23, 2018
Il y a deux façons de regarder ce film, la première... au premier dégré et la seconde au second... Au second degré, le film est très réussi puisqu'il constitue une merveille de satire du soldat américain dans un pays occupé (par lesIl y a deux façons de regarder ce film, la première... au premier dégré et la seconde au second... Au second degré, le film est très réussi puisqu'il constitue une merveille de satire du soldat américain dans un pays occupé (par les Américains).

Non seulement du point de vue des soldats eux-mêmes confrontés à un merdier inextricable et une mission ingérable mais également du côté des occupés (les Irakiens) et de l'opinion américaine (civile) avec la crise de nerfs de la gauchiste au piercing qui finit avec un "sieg heil" (!). Sans compter bien entendu, la grande muette, l'US Army elle-même lors de son enquête dont De Palma ne nous donnera pas le résultat.

On retrouve donc sensiblement caricaturés, les soldats aux mentalités diverses, de l'ancien taulard psychopathe (oui, carrément) à celui qui filme tout avec sa caméra en passant par le soldat bisounours très empathique avec l'ennemi. Sans oublier le gros bourrin de base qui ne pense qu'au cul et à ses flingues et inversement. Tout cela est drôle, exagéré mais recèle en même temps une part de vérité, à savoir que la guerre, puis une armée d'occupation en butte à une résistance et guerilla, eh bien, c'est sale.

Si on se cantonne au premier degré par contre, De Palma nous montre presque un documentaire, innondé de ses préoccupations pacifistes, un documentaire clairement orienté et colérique, indigné et tutti quanti : à notre époque, on dirait qu'il s'agit d'un merveilleux et salvateur "lanceur d'alerte"...

Alerte, la guerre c'est sale, attention, les armes tuent... les soldats surmenés tendent à déraper plus ou moins sévèrement et De Palma de nous faire gober que la décapitation en direct d'un soldat américain, c'était seulement à cause du dérapage de son unité, ouais, ouais, ouais.

Allons, allons, Brian, pas d'amalgames... on est bien d'accord avec toi, cette guerre était injustifiée et lamentable mais les vrais responsables ne sont pas les militaires, ce sont leurs chefs et partant, les politiques. Dommage que ta colère t'ait quelque peu obscurci l'esprit...

Redacted pourra donc être diversement interprété et c'est ce qui fait son intérêt ; d'un autre côté, on est pas toujours très sûr du pied sur lequel il faut danser avec ce film : naïveté gauchisante ou satire cynique ? De Palma reste en tout cas un sentimental comme le montrent les photos des victimes ensanglantées à la fin, toutes irakiennes (tiens, tiens) sur une musique pleurnicharde. On est encore loin du pathos de son "Outrages" mais on s'en rapproche.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
More From This Movie

52 Critic Reviews

4.9 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 81 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
2 77 Project Hail Mary
3 75 Send Help
4 73 Hoppers
5 72 The Sheep Detectives
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL