Magnet Releasing | Release Date: January 2, 2015
5.0
USER SCORE
Mixed or average reviews based on 53 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
12
Mixed:
29
Negative:
12
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
8
horcrux2007May 29, 2015
After a pretty underwhelming third installment, this Spanish horror series largely bounces back with the surprisingly good final entry, REC 4. I was a little skeptical since REC 3 was mediocre, but this was definitely an unexpectedlyAfter a pretty underwhelming third installment, this Spanish horror series largely bounces back with the surprisingly good final entry, REC 4. I was a little skeptical since REC 3 was mediocre, but this was definitely an unexpectedly enjoyable movie. Largely ignoring the events of REC 3 and picking up right where REC 2 left off, REC 4 once again follows doomed television reporter Angela Vidal who was rescued from the infected apartment complex and is now on a ship in the middle of an ocean, but she may still be possessing the parasite that started the initial outbreak. REC 4 won't win any points for being scary or terribly original, as this is more of an action thriller than horror, but it is mostly successful due to the fact that it drops the slapstick comedy of REC 3 and goes for a more serious tone, and the setting make this stand out in the zombie genre. The tight hallways and tiny rooms throughout the ship do emulate the claustrophobic feeling of the first two movies, which amplifies the tension and thrill of many scenes in the film. The characters in the movie also make REC 4 so much better than it could have been. Each character has their own personality and seem real, mostly because of the outstanding acting. If you're a fan of the REC series, I highly recommend REC 4 because it's a great ending to an iconic horror franchise. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
5
JohnMasterLJan 2, 2015
Rec 4 le queda grande el titulo "Apocalipsis" aplausos al editor, guionista o director de haber quitado el titulo "Apocalipsis" en la película. Ya no es mas Rec, de ser una saga de terror de origen Español, se convierte en una producción alRec 4 le queda grande el titulo "Apocalipsis" aplausos al editor, guionista o director de haber quitado el titulo "Apocalipsis" en la película. Ya no es mas Rec, de ser una saga de terror de origen Español, se convierte en una producción al estilo "Gringo" o Hollywood, es lamentable si, pero supera en todos los aspectos a la horrorosa Rec 3 de Paco Plaza, pero se queda muy corta en comparación con sus 2 primeras entregas. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
TheQuietGamerMay 17, 2015
After the disappointing third movie Jaume Balaguero returns. In doing so we lose the attempts at humor and get a sequel that's more in touch with the series horror roots. The only thing that's kept from the third movie is the traditionalAfter the disappointing third movie Jaume Balaguero returns. In doing so we lose the attempts at humor and get a sequel that's more in touch with the series horror roots. The only thing that's kept from the third movie is the traditional cinematography. There's no found footage here.

The apartment setting from the first two [REC] movies is traded for that of a ship in the middle of the ocean. The corridors and hallways are just as dark and tight, the sense of claustrophobia and fear aren't there. The chase scenes still pack tension though out side of an unintentionally goofy scene involving infected, computer generated monkeys.

What we get here is more in line with a typical zombie movie. There isn't any "apocalypse" here so I don't really understand why that's the subtitle. The exorcism elements of [REC] 2 are nowhere to be found, which probably would have helped it establish more of it's own identity. It might not due anything new for zombie movies, but it's a good return to form for the series. The plot even picks up where [REC] 2 left off, so we get to see a continuation of that plot, unlike 3 which was a deviation. It doesn't do anything new for zombie movies and it doesn't quite live up to what came before, but it is a good return to form for the series. It might not really succeed at being an actual horror movie, but at least it's trying to be one again.

I give "[REC] 4: Apocalypse" a 7.5/10.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
2
PanchogulMay 23, 2020
Dicen que Rec 3 es la peor pero dicen que esta es mejor, sinceramente no estoy de acuerdo, si bien esta retoma la trama de las dos primeras y tiene mas seriedad, es aburrida de principio a fin, mientras todas las anteriores no pasaban de losDicen que Rec 3 es la peor pero dicen que esta es mejor, sinceramente no estoy de acuerdo, si bien esta retoma la trama de las dos primeras y tiene mas seriedad, es aburrida de principio a fin, mientras todas las anteriores no pasaban de los 80 minutos, esta se extiende por casi 20 minutos más en una trama mal desarrollada y sin gracia, y para rematar, el plano final parece sacado de un videojuego de PS2. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
quincytheodoreJan 14, 2015
After the debacle of chainsaw-wielding bride, REC 4 returns to its root, partially. This one isn't shot in found footage style, although some elements are strung together to make it feel like it's the first REC. Manuela Velasco's return is aAfter the debacle of chainsaw-wielding bride, REC 4 returns to its root, partially. This one isn't shot in found footage style, although some elements are strung together to make it feel like it's the first REC. Manuela Velasco's return is a good direction, her character develops nicely and as the original protagonist it gives some nostalgic investment.

REC 4 uses dark claustrophobic setting, intense scenario, extreme gore and a touch of mystery. It's a good effort as occasionally it delivers decent thrill, although it's more of an action buzz instead of horror. REC was one of the few movies that popularized found footage genre a few years back, it's understandable that it's difficult to create the same effect without the camcorder first person point of view.

Manuela as Angela is more mature after her ordeal. How she handles different situations also affects the tone of movie. Apparently, the badass female protagonist idea hasn't been scratch entirely, since the movie often tries to portray Angela as such. This isn't completely bad, Angela can't run around scared all the time, and her more aggressive nature seems plausible as defense mechanism. She hasn't transformed into superheroine either, although sometimes I can't help but thinking she looks like she's in a Resident Evil movie.

The movie gives more time to build up tension and establish the other characters in order to set-up later altercation. First REC has consecutive bursts of scare, it never let up, but on the fourth iteration the novel sense has wear off, so the longer escalation is needed to get the vivid atmosphere. Regrettably, REC 4 only manages to achieve the violent action tone, not the intended gripping dread.

To some degree, the movie knows the limit of its horror potential or human drama, thus churning blood and gore to maximize the horror effect. A few twists here and there keep the audience guessing, but eventually it relies on action sequences on latter arc. When the movie gives the protagonist arsenal of weapon and fighting mentality, it's obvious that it opts for action.

RED 4 is a glorified action horror, it's successful in differentiating itself from horde of other same movies, mostly due to its namesake and main heroine. For those wanting the fright of original REC, it still has some leftover, but it might not be as satisfying.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
LeZeeNov 4, 2015
When the source followed straight to the isolated lab.

It looks like been ages. I know the movies (the previous three), but can't remember the scenes. A quick recap would have been helpful, but I did not do that and went ahead with this.
When the source followed straight to the isolated lab.

It looks like been ages. I know the movies (the previous three), but can't remember the scenes. A quick recap would have been helpful, but I did not do that and went ahead with this. That's the reason I hate to follow television series on the broadcast which drag one season for over 6 months. This was the fourth film in the [Rec] film series and third in the story continuation after first two. The third installment was set in the parallel timeline to that before one, but off the track narration. In this, an old woman character was brought on-board to make sure the third film was not an offbeat from the series.

Except the opening few minutes, the rest of the story takes place on a moving ship. Kind of similar to 'Sector 7', though both the flicks are entirely different. The ship is used as a laboratory to develop a vaccine for the deadly disease which turns humans into the flesh eating zombies. It is protected by the armed paramilitary force. Somehow the virus breaks loose, the infection spreads out quickly through the various platforms like lab monkeys and foods. How the survivours fight to remain alive in the nowhere of the ocean is the remaining narrative. If there is a way, how they make it out that comes with the intensified gore battle between the undead and the living.

I never expected another film in the series, I thought it was a trilogy, but after seeing this I felt the idea was not that bad after all. Just like the 'Jurassic Park' movies, the fourth movie puts the franchise back on the track after the third was derailed. The first film was so good and a bit scary too, followed by another decent movie. Like I mentioned the third flick was different, but a sustainable one to the theme and title.

"I don not know what was going on,
but luckily I was not there."

This story starts off with a slow, until the third act where the pace picks up rapidly. Not scary, but towards the final sequences, it was very fast and edgy. The way it concluded, the outro scene was a hint for another film in the franchise. But in my opinion, it should have ended with three films or with this one. Hoping for a better one if there is going to be another [Rec], because my rating in numeral declining by one point following the each sequel.

I think the suspense should have maintained well. There were some tiny twists and turns on the weak movie plot, but I anticipated the final twist and it did not deliver with that effectively. I know the theme was built on the situation, not depended on prolonged story. Because the action speaks more than any kind of development to give a clean vision on happening. After all, most of the horror movies follow the same sutra, but sometimes the horror-dramas exclude it and this is not one of that.

Its a collective performance, individually, not noticeable. Because it does not follow any particular character. Though the character Angela, the television reporter was the centre of the attraction as it marks her comeback who was main in the first two films. The filmmaking was compromised, I mean it was not 'found footage' style movie as should have been. Because where this story set in does not demand such kind of cinematographical portrayal. Also avoids the dark atmosphere that used to scare us, especially the night vision screenplay was critical in the earlier two films to creep out the viewers.

The title for this installment was 'Apocalypse', but that does not make any sense what they show in the exit scene. Should have called it 'Zombie Ship' like 'Ghost Ship'. I feel it is worth a watch, only to keep updated the [Rec] film series, because if they make a phenomenal 5th movie, we don't have to go back to 4th for continuation.

6/10
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
lukeparkes26Jul 16, 2016
REC 4: Apocalypse absolutely blew me away.

I thoroughly enjoyed the original REC; it was one of the most exhilarating, scary-as-hell horror roller-coaster I'd ever been on. The second one was just as scary. And the third one, though
REC 4: Apocalypse absolutely blew me away.

I thoroughly enjoyed the original REC; it was one of the most exhilarating, scary-as-hell horror roller-coaster I'd ever been on.

The second one was just as scary.

And the third one, though it followed completely different characters in a removed setting, delivered the same ounce of thrills as the first two, with action-packed, fast-paced scenes.

Now, we return to the story-line started in the original, following Angela again.

From start to finish, my eyes never wavered from the screen; nerves took over me, and my heart raced with every jump-scare moment.

I was completely satisfied with the end - you will know why when you watch it! It is my favourite horror franchise of all time, and in the future, I will re-watch the films - and hope the books written based around it are translated into English one day!
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
inaneswineNov 14, 2017
After a promising beginning for the franchise with two exhilarating and frightening films, REC 3 threw the biggest cinematic spanner into the works like no other film franchise I have ever witnessed. After that, I knew that REC 4 couldn'tAfter a promising beginning for the franchise with two exhilarating and frightening films, REC 3 threw the biggest cinematic spanner into the works like no other film franchise I have ever witnessed. After that, I knew that REC 4 couldn't possibly be any worse. So it has that going for it.

REC 4 certainly is an improvement, but it's still a disappointment. What it wisely does is ditch the found-footage style completely, as opposed to the third film's disorientating switch partway through. The "comic" elements from the third film still unfortunately linger in bits and pieces, though the overall dark mood of the film works in its favour.

Yet the film doesn't seem to know what to do with itself, its plot or its characters (a warm welcome back to Manuela Velasco, by the way), and ends up being a bizarre amalgam of other sources. It's like Captain Phillips crossed with Braindead. And by the time the ending does arrive, I had sort of already wished the ship would just blow up, and bury the last of the franchise at sea where it belongs.

It's an okay film, but it exists as a patchy attempt to crawl back onto the rails. For what has been billed as the final REC film, it is most unsatisfying.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
HaithamBJan 7, 2015
Clearly this franchise is a cult classic. I appreciated the first "[REC]" film and what it is trying to do to the found footage genre. But this sequel, just never lives up to the so-so "epicness" it is trying to promote in its title.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
MarickJul 28, 2015
I expected to be more fun, but no more difference between Rec 3 .
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
russiangamerJan 25, 2017
У вас есть интернет, уже поздно и вы хотите спать, но не можете уснуть, а все магазины уже закрыты? Смотрите данный фильм, он поможет вам уснуть 100%.
Невыносимо скучное кино. Ни капли не интересное. Ни капли не страшное и не атмосферное.
И
У вас есть интернет, уже поздно и вы хотите спать, но не можете уснуть, а все магазины уже закрыты? Смотрите данный фильм, он поможет вам уснуть 100%.
Невыносимо скучное кино. Ни капли не интересное. Ни капли не страшное и не атмосферное.
И что может быть лучше намёка на сиквел в плохом сиквеле! Плохой фильм.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
RaduAMar 23, 2019
55/100

  It was not as bad as I thought it would be (I saw it a long time ago and remembered it was bad) but it still was disappointing. The third movie was a spin-off but this continues the story of the second.   They also left the
55/100

  It was not as bad as I thought it would be (I saw it a long time ago and remembered it was bad) but it still was disappointing. The third movie was a spin-off but this continues the story of the second.
  They also left the found-footage style because... I do not know. They tried to introduce new characters but I did not really care, it's not as scary as the first two and has a strange twist...
  It's not as stupid as the third ... but still not good. At least it does not feel like a parody...
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews