[Rec] 2
Magnet Releasing | Release Date: July 9, 2010
7.0
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 109 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
68
Mixed:
36
Negative:
5
Watch Now
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
6
JacobparkerMay 19, 2013
Rec was a really shocking and creepy movie.
Rec 2 is not so good then the first one but it has its moments, its scary moments.
It looks all so real.
But I prefer the first one.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
5
MarickJul 28, 2015
Not the best sequel for this series .
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
5
grandpajoe6191Sep 30, 2011
"[REC] 2", the sequel of the creepy "[REC]", still has its scares and chills. Only your horror ride has become rustier and unpredictable.
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
4
btzneb92Aug 15, 2012
They decided to go bigger and broader. The result? A very pisspoor sequel.
They decided to go bigger and broader. The result? A very pisspoor sequel.
They decided to go bigger and broader. The result? A very pisspoor sequel.
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
6
rotkuJul 10, 2011
Good horror movie that does close some of the gaps left in the first movie and it was nice to see a lesser used route taken as a explanation for the virus outbreak. I would hope there is a third installment otherwise some of the charactersGood horror movie that does close some of the gaps left in the first movie and it was nice to see a lesser used route taken as a explanation for the virus outbreak. I would hope there is a third installment otherwise some of the characters were a waste of time but overall it was a good effort which followed the path of the first episode well and keep the action and horror coming all through the movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
AutiTakahashiApr 7, 2013
The foremost flaw of “[REC] 2” is its futile attempt to include a baffling, supernatural plot within its generic, but nonetheless scary, concept. To begin with, the first “[REC]” wasn't even the kind of film that opens itself to theThe foremost flaw of “[REC] 2” is its futile attempt to include a baffling, supernatural plot within its generic, but nonetheless scary, concept. To begin with, the first “[REC]” wasn't even the kind of film that opens itself to the possibility of a sensible sequel, but here it is anyway, along with the promise of a third and fourth installment.

“[REC] 2” is an immediate continuation of the original’s conclusion. The fast-acting, death-inducing virus is still contained inside the quarantined apartment, surrounded by snipers and covered with some sort of special, government plastic. If there are any human survivors trapped inside, the authorities are determined to keep them in that state. We revisit the apartment when we follow a group of SWAT officers, who are commanded by a Health Official.

They charge into the zombie-infested building with thick armor and heavy weaponry, but their reasons for entering it in the first place are rather unclear. Surely, this isn't a rescue mission, for in the first film, anyone who tried to leave the building was rewarded with a bullet to the face. Once inside, we are informed that their objective is to come up with an antidote against a disease no one outside the apartment has contracted. Yes, a more reasonable option would be to burn down the building until it resembles dust, but no, because that idea wouldn't be enough for three more “[REC]” movies.

Read more here: http://localmoviereview.com/rec-2-movie-review/… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
RikiegeFeb 2, 2013
A Spanish film that is original on the one hand and on the other is not much. 'Rec 2' is an original film because the camera is part of history, and not original because it deals with zombies and zombie movies are already heavily views.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
russiangamerJan 25, 2017
В целом - это та же 1 часть, но тут всё получилось похуже.
1. Та же локация, которую уже можно было изучить в первом фильме.
2. Не страшно, хотя и первая часть была не особо страшной, но чего у неё не отнимешь, так это атмосферы. В этой частиВ целом - это та же 1 часть, но тут всё получилось похуже.
1. Та же локация, которую уже можно было изучить в первом фильме.
2. Не страшно, хотя и первая часть была не особо страшной, но чего у неё не отнимешь, так это атмосферы. В этой части она довольно слабая.
3. Вирус объяснили одержимостью дьяволом, а против уже не заражённых, а одержимых действует крест... Тут у каждого своё мнение. Кому-то не понравилось такое решение, а кому-то наоборот, показалось хорошим. Я отношусь к первому случаю.
Итог:
Можно ограничиться первой частью, которая очень даже отличная. А эту смотрите на свой страх и риск.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
Ryo91Apr 20, 2020
__________________________________________ Mittelmäßiger Horror Film 5/10 *
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
More From This Movie

52 Critic Reviews

7.0 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 81 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
2 77 Project Hail Mary
3 75 Send Help
4 73 Hoppers
5 72 The Sheep Detectives
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL