Pulp Fiction

8

imthenoobJan 24, 2012

The plot is a little confusing at times (during Bruce Willis's part of the film) but overall its interesting and you gotta pay close attention to it. The cast is good ,not as great as people make it seem to be. There are parts in the movieThe plot is a little confusing at times (during Bruce Willis's part of the film) but overall its interesting and you gotta pay close attention to it. The cast is good ,not as great as people make it seem to be. There are parts in the movie that are excellent as well (usually the parts with Samuel L. Jackson). Overall its just a good film and worth the watch.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

8

MovieGuysSep 15, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Pulp Fiction is one of those movies I liked more in retrospect than at the time. I think Tarantino's genius does play a part in this film, and the product is substantial; but Reservoir Dogs is better.

All the characters use witty, random dialogue about European hamburgers and the sexual implications of foot massages, but to what avail? I mean, as fun as it is to hear and watch, I just found that the whole movie lacked something. Maybe a little bit more editing would've done the trick; maybe it was something else. I can't quite put my finger on it.

Don't get me wrong. I think this is a classic Tarantino movie. I enjoyed Samuel L. Jackson's quotable lines, as well as a couple of outstanding scenes. (The OD, the Big Date, the scene where Harvey Keitel gets rid of the body, etc.) As a whole, the movie does work. But some minor details would make it even better.

The storyline of Bruce Willis and Ving Rhames was a little much. (Did Ving *really* have to get raped?) I know Tarantino just wanted to add some shock value to his film, but even for a person who doesn't mind that kind of thing in movies I found it a little extreme.

Oh, and one more thing: I learned that "zapateria" means "shoe store" in Spanish, courtesy of Butch. … Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

warrenworldMay 3, 2014

The direction, acting, and template are just the things that make this a cinematic achievement, even when there are moments of imperfect conversation.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

DokaluJun 6, 2015

This movie is just cool. That's the perfect word to describe it: cool. Cool script, cool directing, cool Tarantino, cool story, cool action, cool acting, cool actors, cool movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

IuliaAndNov 22, 2015

Along with Reservoir Dogs I consider it one of QT's classics. It has everything it needs to have to be considered a masterpiece: humor, great acting, thoughtful message, interesting plot and, as always the directing doesn't disappoint.Along with Reservoir Dogs I consider it one of QT's classics. It has everything it needs to have to be considered a masterpiece: humor, great acting, thoughtful message, interesting plot and, as always the directing doesn't disappoint. Surprising the audience with smart dialogue, Pulp Fiction remains an exquisite movie that made its mark in the evolution of cinematography.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

JumpmanJan 7, 2016

Overrated for sure but undoubtedly entertaining. Tarantino is a genius he is among the top 10 filmmakers of all time and maybe the most genuine one!!!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

SrPepeSep 5, 2018

Una excelente y divertida película, muy bien filmada y con grandes actores.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

shiftworkerNov 30, 2016

Crime. Closely shot, sharply scripted gangster tale. The scenes appear only lightly linked, partly because each are so strong in themselves, and partly because they are steadily drow together. Watching this is sheer luxury, like the smoothestCrime. Closely shot, sharply scripted gangster tale. The scenes appear only lightly linked, partly because each are so strong in themselves, and partly because they are steadily drow together. Watching this is sheer luxury, like the smoothest milk chocolate, it leaves me feeling spoilt but wanting more. Mmmm.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

akenaton1984Sep 17, 2017

El guión es impecable y no toma el camino fácil. Tiene una musicalización estupenda y una serie de personajes en un trasfondo kitch lleno de violencia.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

antonzhalobAug 14, 2021

не плохой фильм
точнее неплохие истории
понравилась история про чоппер и зеда

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

hughes857Dec 19, 2017

Even though this film does not match up to the height of Reservoir Dogs, it is still a creative piece of work by one of the best directors in the industry. This shows one again that Tarantino is at his peak of directing and filmmaking. TheEven though this film does not match up to the height of Reservoir Dogs, it is still a creative piece of work by one of the best directors in the industry. This shows one again that Tarantino is at his peak of directing and filmmaking. The acting is admit-tingly better than Reservoir Dogs but Reservoir Dogs still sustains its persona than Pulp Fiction did throughout its duration. Do not let this review hinder your expectations of the film as it is a extravagant showing that is hypnotizing to many viewers and will transform this film industry as time goes on.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

amheretojudgeJul 29, 2019

This is a healthy, productive and scandalous magazine that treats its audience with a smart flirty language.

Pulp Fiction Tarantino's career defining project is raw and honest. And maybe that's why it holds a place in one of those rareThis is a healthy, productive and scandalous magazine that treats its audience with a smart flirty language.

Pulp Fiction

Tarantino's career defining project is raw and honest. And maybe that's why it holds a place in one of those rare milestones that can and does hold up against time. But writer-director Quentin Tarantino has honed his thrills for the romance of conversation in a much more absorbing humoriste language than his previous case. And this is what's been updated and stayed with him over the years. Good conventional themes that spirals out into unexpected quirky crime scenes instead of the other way around. And those jokes aren't just some filling. It is their to nourish human behavior. The telltales threads these various incidents into one film where either it grows itself into a character or pitches itself as their philosophy or introduction.

He took a neo-noir genre and smashed it on screen with the ultimate question. Question being, What's the morbid fascination over the outlaws of the society residing between common people persisting to enact like one and engage in one? Now you see what Tarantino has done with his masterpiece. He took two extreme ends of a situation and blends it in, evolutionizing a pulp treat whose purity is unfiltered and is highly valuable in the market. Selling that product officially are two hitmen Samuel L. Jackson and John Travolta.

With his over-the-top confidence and sassy dominating persona on screen, Jackson might be giving his life's best work but personally I put my chips on Travolta's groovy twist. I grew up watching Saturday Night Live and Greece, his understated situational physical comic timing beams me back into a 4 year old kid; Warmer! Warmer! DISCO! And some of his best moments in Pulp Fiction is with Uma Thurman whose dance under the influence of Neil Diamond's Girl You'll Be A Woman Soon is an apt description of this vanity kingdom.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Star_ScreamNov 9, 2019

This movie has great dialogues, one of the most memorable soundtracks and unique storytelling. But the story itself wasn't mine

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Wavy_YeezyMay 5, 2019

I enjoy this movie I don't absolutely gush over it like many many people reviewing it but still a pretty good movie. I don't think its Tarninto's magna opus as many think but still a great movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

AvishanHSep 21, 2019

I don't like Tarantino. And I almost hate his style but this is quiet a masterpiece. That's it......

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

AlexMakesToastJan 4, 2023

Pulp fiction = 8/10
............................................................

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

BryanH.Feb 4, 2007

To see it once is novelty, twice is to witness filmic fraud. If you are superficial, you will love the cool one-liners and banter, and even the gore. But Tarantino failed to fool me into believing this was anything more than several film To see it once is novelty, twice is to witness filmic fraud. If you are superficial, you will love the cool one-liners and banter, and even the gore. But Tarantino failed to fool me into believing this was anything more than several film shorts, with a common character played by Travolta. To put this in a top ten greats list does injustice to hundreds of films.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

PeterfMar 1, 2008

It was a good film but way too overrated, it seemed to drag on too much for me and the dialogue was sometimes too pointless. whenever i say reservoir dogs is better than pulp fiction evreyone thinks thats stupid but reservoir dogs was short It was a good film but way too overrated, it seemed to drag on too much for me and the dialogue was sometimes too pointless. whenever i say reservoir dogs is better than pulp fiction evreyone thinks thats stupid but reservoir dogs was short and entertaining. i only find john trovolta and samuel jacksons roles the only neseciary and entetaing roles to watch. In reservoir dogs all cast had its part in the storyline and alll eqaully entertaining. also there is too much copying from reservoir dogs, the diner scene at the start, the gimp scene which is a torture scene lik reservoir dogs and the mexican stand off at the end. Tarantino is a unique director but in some parts of this film a found him just a bit too bizzare.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

RegOzApr 5, 2012

Tarantino has good movies, but to me this is not his best. As many, I believe Pulp Fiction is overrated. Personally, I enjoyed Reservoir Dogs much more. Of course I can't say this is a bad movie, for that would be unfair; but it is not, inTarantino has good movies, but to me this is not his best. As many, I believe Pulp Fiction is overrated. Personally, I enjoyed Reservoir Dogs much more. Of course I can't say this is a bad movie, for that would be unfair; but it is not, in my opinion, a masterpiece. Tarantino has made himself a name because his movies are different and challenge our ideas of 'normality', but I don't see any greatness' in Pulp Fiction. I didn't find it engaging or profound; I didn't feel it was particularly fun or witty either. I guess most people either like this film or hate it. I am ambivalent about it. I think because of its cinematography, the good performances, and its peculiarity it deserves a 7. To me, giving it more than that is bestowing this movie with a nature and trascendence it doesn't have. However, I am okey if you disagree with me and I can see why.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

beingryanjudeAug 28, 2014

It is difficult to not recognize the triumph that Pulp Fiction truly is. Quentin Tarantino proves here his place amongst the film industry. Uma Thurman is superb! Many of the sequences are mind-blowing. My one issue with Pulp: leave outIt is difficult to not recognize the triumph that Pulp Fiction truly is. Quentin Tarantino proves here his place amongst the film industry. Uma Thurman is superb! Many of the sequences are mind-blowing. My one issue with Pulp: leave out Bruce Willis, entirely.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

csw12Nov 26, 2015

As quirky and surprising as a movie gets without being annoying. The one liners are priceless and this will be one of the best roller coaster rides you will have in a film

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

HotFuzeFeb 25, 2013

While I definitely enjoyed this movie and it deserves its status as a classic, to be honest I was disappointed with it. It is overly reliant on the one trick of mixing up the order of the scenes so one does not fully understand what isWhile I definitely enjoyed this movie and it deserves its status as a classic, to be honest I was disappointed with it. It is overly reliant on the one trick of mixing up the order of the scenes so one does not fully understand what is happening until it is brought together in the end. While this might have been revolutionary at the time of Fiction's release it has been done many times since then in better movies. Special shout out to John Travolta's interesting interpretation of Vincent Vega, I felt it was the only thing in the movie I thought was truly unique.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

BradySmithNov 3, 2015

It's a witty, original, funny, and very stylish movie... but it's very overrated. The things to like are the performances, memorable characters, and it's unique style, which is most apparent in the scenes inside of Mia Wallace's house. ButIt's a witty, original, funny, and very stylish movie... but it's very overrated. The things to like are the performances, memorable characters, and it's unique style, which is most apparent in the scenes inside of Mia Wallace's house. But there are patches that I didn't much care for and I've seen better crime movies. I'm sure it's not quite possible to review it objectively after 20 years of imitators and movies influenced by it without it feeling a little watered down, but I didn't quite see why so many people are in love with this movie. But I'll give it original and entertaining which are anything but undesirable traits.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

sammieteeApr 14, 2013

Pulp Fiction is the type of movie that gets better the more times you watch it. It is a true cult classic, but I was slightly disappointed. I think it was just because I expected so much from it. I did like how it all came together in the endPulp Fiction is the type of movie that gets better the more times you watch it. It is a true cult classic, but I was slightly disappointed. I think it was just because I expected so much from it. I did like how it all came together in the end but I did spend most of the movie slightly confused. It is a good movie in the end and is worth it's tile as a cult classic.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Meth-dudeJan 8, 2017

Undoubtedly a classic, Pulp Fiction is well acted, well executed, well made and the movie was definitely interesting. It might have been too long for it's own good, but it's still a pretty good movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Epik_NinnjaMay 23, 2015

I understand the high reviews and why this is regarded as such a classic (and I agree it's a classic) but I didn't love it like most others did. It's an episodic and eccentric film about a number of different men who somehow end up workingI understand the high reviews and why this is regarded as such a classic (and I agree it's a classic) but I didn't love it like most others did. It's an episodic and eccentric film about a number of different men who somehow end up working for this man with a bandade on his head. Either that, or he's trying to kill them. It's funny at times and just plain stylish at others. I'll admit the dialogue is good. Despite all this, it's just so eccentric sometimes that I begin to not like it as much. Also, there are some just plain boring scenes where characters talk about nothig of importance. I suppose this is part of the appeal, with its stylistic dialogue and all, but I was bored. To wrap this up, there's no doubt I like the movie but I'm afraid I can't say that I love it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

jonslowDec 9, 2018

Quentin Tarantino style. You'll find the best dialogue/scripts from his movie especially this one Pulp Fiction.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

glommanNov 23, 2019

The title of the movie basically describes itself, while Pulp Fiction is funny and sometimes even smart in certain ways, there's still a lot of gritty and nasty stuff to be dealt with. I would probably watch it 1-2 times again, just to fullyThe title of the movie basically describes itself, while Pulp Fiction is funny and sometimes even smart in certain ways, there's still a lot of gritty and nasty stuff to be dealt with. I would probably watch it 1-2 times again, just to fully comprehend what's going on, but I still don't really see the appeal many others see and I wouldn't go as far as hailing this movie as a masterpiece of our modern time, it's still a good movie though, and a must watch, if you like character-driven movies with lots of strangeness to be seen.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

7

DawdlingPoetNov 23, 2021

I admit im not esp. keen on over stylised films that don't have a massive amount of substance and I feared this may be the case with this film but given its such a cult classic and it was shown on TV recently, I thought I'd give it a watchI admit im not esp. keen on over stylised films that don't have a massive amount of substance and I feared this may be the case with this film but given its such a cult classic and it was shown on TV recently, I thought I'd give it a watch anyway. At first I wasn't sure I could see a lot of substance between the various sub plots but by the end, I admit it did come together reasonably well. The key moments, to me, were Uma Thurman dancing with Travolta in the diner/bar and Jules talking about his dislike for eating anything he regards as dirty (never mind the irony/hypocracy that he kills people for a living). There is some dark comedy, although it didn't entirely appeal to me but I can understand why other people really like it. It was interesting to see the director in such a long-ish scene towards the end - usually, from the films I've seen anyway, when the film director or writer (Stan Lee etc.) appears in their film, as a cameo of sorts, it tends to be a pretty brief and often dialogue free occurence but not this time, although I can't say I liked the strongly racist language used but generally this is a good film of its sort I suppose. I liked the scene with Tim Roth's character, Pumpkin, in his self inflicted scenario (which we see briefly at the start) being played out towards the end.

I also remembered that there was a large movie poster of this film up in the classroom I used to study media studies in, in the late 90s, so that was a slight flashback. Pulp Fiction was on one wall and Assassins with Stallone and Banderas was on the other one I think - oh and 'Peter's Friends' on another wall I think but I haven't seen that film yet(!).

If it sounds of interest to you then yes, I'd recommend it, although if your either reasonably squeamish and/or don't like hard drug use or sexual violence hinted at (although not explicitly shown, or not in the film version I saw anyway), then this would be best avoided I suppose.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

BruterakeJan 30, 2022

Pulp fiction é quase injusto pq eu achei ele só bom, eu fui indo achando que era um dos melhores filmes da história com o hype que tem e acabou que as expectativas foram altas demais se n fosse a atuação esse filme ia ser ruim viu avmPulp fiction é quase injusto pq eu achei ele só bom, eu fui indo achando que era um dos melhores filmes da história com o hype que tem e acabou que as expectativas foram altas demais se n fosse a atuação esse filme ia ser ruim viu avm história nada haver kkkk… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Legit_LeeJun 6, 2020

BoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBoxBox

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

MrPajamasFeb 20, 2021

Pulp Fiction just aren't quite for me. The story is good for me, so quite confusing, because there are more characters to jump on during the film, and overall I have a solid goulash in it. But the film has legendary scenes, such as dancingPulp Fiction just aren't quite for me. The story is good for me, so quite confusing, because there are more characters to jump on during the film, and overall I have a solid goulash in it. But the film has legendary scenes, such as dancing with Mia or others, but I don't want to go into spoilers. The film even amused several times with its vulgar announcements, which are great. The music is also delicious. But when I return to that story, it unfortunately brings the film down the most for me. Tarantino simply has his own style, which a lot of people love, but I don't have to. So don't take me wrong personally. I enjoyed the film and it's good for me, but that's all for me. In short, for me a good film and nothing more, which I can recommend only because of those legendary scenes and most of all I believe that you will understand the story and not, like me, that you will get lost.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

AgentLviJun 27, 2023

Decent movie. The story is so --so, scoring is great, visual is decent, and the voice is also great

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

RodG.Feb 20, 2007

Most people I know love this movie. It's decent. I'd like it a lot better if it weren't for the entire part of the movie with Uma Thurman.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

DuduziuzJun 16, 2012

I think there's too much talking along the movie. Good for those that enjoy Tarantino's ideas. In fact, I just watched it once there's lots of people talking about the movie, but it's not big deal.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

survivorfan989Jul 6, 2013

Didn't really know what to expect from this film and have left wondering what a lot of it was about, but at the end of the day I can see the appeal and am not too surprised a lot of people love it thanks to Tarantino's quirky style. It's aDidn't really know what to expect from this film and have left wondering what a lot of it was about, but at the end of the day I can see the appeal and am not too surprised a lot of people love it thanks to Tarantino's quirky style. It's a mix of a few short stories blended together to make a movie and its somewhat interesting, but I think the films best thing it has going for it is the chemistry between the cast, especially the leads. Overall not really my thing, but it's still good.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

mrSilkieJun 28, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I cannot recommend this movie, it is incredibly slow, the idea of a circular narrative does not make sense. Maybe it was non-linear? in which, I can appreciate that they went against the grain with this, but both me and my buddy were watching this film thinking. When the hell is this movie starting?

It was incredibly slow, things didn't make sense, i felt like the overdose scene and the boxer scene didn't add too much to the over arching story.

I did like the dialogue though, i felt like that was the strongest part of this movie… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

marymaebennettOct 22, 2017

I think 2/3 is about right for this movie. What sells this movie is the acting! My list of people I geniuenly think are good actors is very small. I don't have a long list of bad actors per se but it takes a lot for me to see a performance inI think 2/3 is about right for this movie. What sells this movie is the acting! My list of people I geniuenly think are good actors is very small. I don't have a long list of bad actors per se but it takes a lot for me to see a performance in either light. Pulp Fiction added two to the list: Samuel L. Jackson and Amanda Plummer. Both of these actors knocked it out of the park and made themselves noticed. I thought I would give the movie 7/10 for the acting alone but then when I compiled my thoughts, I realized just how negative it gets. First off, the swearing dialogue, I can deal with foul language, but it did not flow. It got choppy and it was like Tarantino had a quota to meet, so he just kept sticking them in there. Uma Thurman's character was ridiculous as was that whole random scene in the restaurant. The ending is beautiful don't get me wrong but the nonlinear set up really did not make sense at certain points nor when I looked it up did I think the chronological ending needed to happen. The leather person thing also made no sense. This was just like the director had a bunch of ideas, put it in a blender and spit it out and yet it is supposedly a masterpiece? Again, the only thing saving this score was the two masterful performances. It's a shame Amanda Plummer doesn't really have anything else to her name.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Arlene123Sep 5, 2018

I kinda like QT movies but honestly this one is a bit weird. The dialogue is non-sense (too much blah blah for nothing), the acting is mediocre at best and there is no action, no emotion, not a good and interesting story with bad guys etc.I kinda like QT movies but honestly this one is a bit weird. The dialogue is non-sense (too much blah blah for nothing), the acting is mediocre at best and there is no action, no emotion, not a good and interesting story with bad guys etc. It's not funny at all. Ridiculous. It's not a garbage but it's too overrated. I have seen better movies from Tarantino, like Kill Bill (better by far), Inglourious Basterds, Django Unchained, Jackie Brown and Reservoir Dogs. Death Proof was good too. The Hateful Eight was as mediocre as Pulp Fiction, which means....a huge dissapointment! Only the music is great.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

SuzRa1Oct 26, 2018

I feel bad for everyone that saw this movie after hearing all the hype and praise. If you don't expect too much, you'll find it very entertaining, even sorta silly. I'm happy to say it gave me a newfound admiration for Bruce Willis.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

AdamNasserAug 6, 2019

I'm surprised about how this overrated piece was critically acclaimed by countless viewers. They compare it to Scarface, Kill Bill etc and it isn't even at the caliber of any of the above.

The movie is perfect in every way, except the plot.I'm surprised about how this overrated piece was critically acclaimed by countless viewers. They compare it to Scarface, Kill Bill etc and it isn't even at the caliber of any of the above.

The movie is perfect in every way, except the plot. Despite the movie's issue only covering one field, PF just lost four points out of 10 because of filler that lasted for an hour. That filler constitutes of a scenario and a hangout. The scenario being Butch's part and the hangout, where the chick has zero involvement with the plot (if it has any). My father once asked me what Pulp Fiction is about and even I can't answer. Simply told it was an action/thriller starring Travolta and Willis.

In short, the plot is not present, despite the unique "chronologic" system, which is a really good move. If this movie has a proper plot, I would've given it a 10.… Expand

5 of 6 users found this helpful51

All this user's reviews

6

WshtgshuNov 23, 2019

I dont i understand what this movie want to tell me he is start from the end and evreything not conccted together

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

KVTheCriticSep 6, 2020

I'm about to say the words that no one dares saying: Pulp Fiction sucks. Look, I can like films with just talking. Once Upon a Time in Hollywood is one of my favorite films, and that's all they do. But at least in that movie, what they wereI'm about to say the words that no one dares saying: Pulp Fiction sucks. Look, I can like films with just talking. Once Upon a Time in Hollywood is one of my favorite films, and that's all they do. But at least in that movie, what they were talking about was interesting and funny. Pulp Fiction is neither. It's just people talking with nothing to back it up. Not even the outrageous and shocking scenes don't hit that hard. You don't care about anything, you don't laugh, you don't get excited, you don't feel ANYTHING. At least the plot comes around in an interesting way and there are some memorable moments. But one is for sure. I don't believe this movie is one of the greatest films of all-time.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

5

asthobaskoroMar 2, 2011

Silly hair, terrible casts. Watch it on 90's maybe will be better? I like Quentin Tarantino, but this flick seems pointless and strange. Universal acclaim didnt attract me give better score.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

5

theantonlolzAug 12, 2011

I watch movies to kind of, "escape" from real life, where there is not much interesting going on. I watch movies expecting they are interesting, with (perhaps) twists and turns, and action, or some comedy. Naturally I didn't expect comedy orI watch movies to kind of, "escape" from real life, where there is not much interesting going on. I watch movies expecting they are interesting, with (perhaps) twists and turns, and action, or some comedy. Naturally I didn't expect comedy or action, but it was the dullest movie I have ever seen. It was so boring, barely any plot development. It is considered a good movie probably only because the sequence of events was reorganized. Another overrated movie by Quentin Tarantino (much like Kill Bill which also sucked @ss).… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

5

TyranianMar 8, 2020

Tarantino in full-force and this seem like even more of a talkfest than his others.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

5

gzayas91Jul 22, 2018

This is a weak movie, not much stories that didn't connect, and I really didn't care. This not my favorites. I'll take Revservoir Dogs anytime.

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

5

Raizulee1Feb 2, 2014

Average movie, nothing stand out in particular, Samuel Jackson is crap, so does Travolta and this is the most offensive and racist movie ever, Quetin Tarantino is racist as hell, how could Hollywood would allow a White guy to use the wordAverage movie, nothing stand out in particular, Samuel Jackson is crap, so does Travolta and this is the most offensive and racist movie ever, Quetin Tarantino is racist as hell, how could Hollywood would allow a White guy to use the word N***** in this movie?… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

5

solomsApr 17, 2015

Another boring movie by Quentin Tarantino. I like the fact that the movie have a portuguese actress but that are so... I don't even know. People talk about Pulp Fiction like that was the biggest thing in the world, I just say NO!

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

5

CinedDec 15, 2022

I’m a big Quentin Tarantino fan and as far as I think he's the only guy who delivers real "cinema" experience to his audience . So a few hours ago I visited his "Masterpiece" as labelled by the audience , The one and only "PULP FICTION" .I’m a big Quentin Tarantino fan and as far as I think he's the only guy who delivers real "cinema" experience to his audience . So a few hours ago I visited his "Masterpiece" as labelled by the audience , The one and only "PULP FICTION" . Even as a huge fan of his I cannot hold back but criticize that this movie was huge disappointment for me . It would've been a great movie if it was directed by some other guy but the bar has been set up too high by Quentin and I personally feel he's not even close to it . Though the movie starts brilliantly and almost drags you in their world ( That adrenaline scene . Wow!!!!)
But the second half is where I feel I was watching something else and it kind of felt dragged , it's not to say that it's the actor's fault , no not at all!! . They have given there very best ( especially John Travolta) but I feel the second half is not upto the mark . One might criticize that character development in the movie is what's so great about this movie and I believe it's true , but to my taste I feel there is not enough of plot development unlike Tarantino's other movies . All and all it's a good movie and a one time watch for me… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

AHMED99Feb 21, 2023

Pure, easy on the eyes, with a perfect pace of enthusiasm, the second best movie I've seen.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

dhFeb 5, 2008

Tarantino's movies are way overrated. Not saying this film was rubbish. It was fun and all but for it to be in metacritics all time top 10 is bad. I don't know why there are critics- i always look at the viewers section as its Tarantino's movies are way overrated. Not saying this film was rubbish. It was fun and all but for it to be in metacritics all time top 10 is bad. I don't know why there are critics- i always look at the viewers section as its always more accurate!… Expand

8 of 46 users found this helpful

4

House0fWolves_Dec 16, 2011

Overrated to the point of ridicule. Pulp Fiction, what is supposed to be one of the greatest films ever, was a cluster of bizarre scenes that were patched up like a rag doll.

9 of 16 users found this helpful97

All this user's reviews

4

BeatrixKiddoSep 9, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. There is nothing authentic or special in this movie. It is highly overrated!
There is no aristotellic stracture, l mean there is no "beginning - middle - ending", it is a mess. Also, all the characters of this non-sense movie are completely annoying, the "plot" is slow and boring and the dialogue is dull. Where is the suspense, the action, the emotions? I used to like some Tarantino's films, such as Kill Bill, Inglourious Basterds and Django Unchained, but this one... l just don't get it. Is this supposed to be "genius"? What am l missing here? I think this movie is so weak, flat and overall, overrated. I would definately say the same things about "Once Upon A Time In Hollywood". I don't understand why people like this stuff so much. I can't take these movies seriously. Pulp Fiction is no "classic" at all. The cast is good and it is fun at times but nothing special to admire or feel impressed.. it looks more like a gangster comedy flick. Much ado about nothing.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

mandrake88Jul 3, 2019

the movie had its moments, but there is nothing in it that would glue my attention to the screen. Unnecessary and long dialogs and monologues that lead to nothing ... no intriguing twists. i would praise the performance of actors, but nothing else.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

3

J.H.Feb 7, 2007

A long winded, often boring, waaayyyy too long movie written around catch phrases and gratuitous violence that sold a fortune of cool posters to college kids all over the world. One long t.v. commercial with endless "props" to 50 years of A long winded, often boring, waaayyyy too long movie written around catch phrases and gratuitous violence that sold a fortune of cool posters to college kids all over the world. One long t.v. commercial with endless "props" to 50 years of pop culture. Gets a three for some of the acting and nothing else.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful

3

EricGNov 15, 2008

Not the worst movie ever, but certainly not the masterpiece it was built up to be: Not funny, not interesting, no real story to tell, Didn't like and couldn't relate to any of the characters. In short, this movie is 2.5 hours of Not the worst movie ever, but certainly not the masterpiece it was built up to be: Not funny, not interesting, no real story to tell, Didn't like and couldn't relate to any of the characters. In short, this movie is 2.5 hours of pure garbage.… Expand

7 of 61 users found this helpful

3

ExKingMay 24, 2013

this movie is beyond being overrated i mean there is an overrated movies and there is pulp fiction
let's break it down shall we ?
some people are impressed that it's 3 stories together REALLY is that impressive how about the movie babelthis movie is beyond being overrated i mean there is an overrated movies and there is pulp fiction
let's break it down shall we ?
some people are impressed that it's 3 stories together REALLY is that impressive
how about the movie babel why it's not a critically acclaimed movie like this ?
the script is so corny that you can hear it from people while street walking
the directing OK what's great about it did you see the end of the movie and how the scenes connected together oh yes this called lack of imagination
the performances is so annoying that it makes you question those actors resumes especially Samuel L. Jackson
the homosexual rape is the weirdest thing i ever seen in a Hollywood movie and that's not even the worst part it doesn't add a thing to the story.
the characters are ridiculous and i can go on and on but there is no point
i guess some people get tricked into thinking that the movie is good
because it's a Quentin Tarantino movie without actually watching the movie.… Expand

2 of 12 users found this helpful210

All this user's reviews

3

andreamonetlumpNov 24, 2017

in this movie there is too much happenning in this movie. it is all over the board. where is it starting. how did we get here. what the **** is this?

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

3

sulaco426Jul 12, 2021

The most overrated flick i've seen so far. just a random movie with a boring and pointless plot and cheesy dialogue.

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

2

JohnH.Apr 2, 2006

The movie was disgusting and devoid of plot. In the same way that American Graffiti offered a portrait of tween-life in the '60s, it offers a sketch of how gangsters and druggies get by. At least this was all I could produce of a point. The movie was disgusting and devoid of plot. In the same way that American Graffiti offered a portrait of tween-life in the '60s, it offers a sketch of how gangsters and druggies get by. At least this was all I could produce of a point. The scene with Christopher Walken was supposed to be a highlight of the comedy. He stuck a watch up his butt. Get it? Yeah, real masterful humor. No second grader could come up with that. The ending was kind of cute. Too bad it was not at all related to any of the other gross shots in the movie. It was just kind of there, for its own sake.… Expand

0 of 5 users found this helpful

2

Werten25Jan 3, 2022

It seems that this is one of those films people just praise to be trendy. Pulp Fiction is one of the most boring things I have ever seen in my life, with hilariously dumb quotes and a nonsensical plot which is nothing more than a group ofIt seems that this is one of those films people just praise to be trendy. Pulp Fiction is one of the most boring things I have ever seen in my life, with hilariously dumb quotes and a nonsensical plot which is nothing more than a group of foul-mouthed idiots doing unrealistically stupid things. I suppose I can’t go too hard since this is a black comedy, but I still can’t give it good points either.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

1

KenL.Aug 30, 2006

[***SPOILERs***] I'm not a prude. i liked "the godfather." and john carpenter's "the thing," which registers pretty darn high on the gore scale, is one of my all-time favorite movies. but "pulp fiction" is cinematic masturbation at[***SPOILERs***] I'm not a prude. i liked "the godfather." and john carpenter's "the thing," which registers pretty darn high on the gore scale, is one of my all-time favorite movies. but "pulp fiction" is cinematic masturbation at its most juvenile. it's one long series of self-indulgent gangland fantasies as seen through the eyes of someone who us under the impression that combining irony with violence equals brilliance. it's uncannily similar to when a young person figures out how to be sarcastic. he/she will revel in his/her newfound powers of irony at every opportunity, until it becomes a matter of sheer self-indulgence. see such film triumphs as these: a righteous african american quoting the bible as he riddles the bodies of young men with enough lead to shield superman's gonads from the motherlode of kryptonite. (oh my god, best movie of all time!!!) a sadistic inbred freak getting a taste of his own sodomy...from a righteous black man who moments before was on the receiving end of the same prescription. (never before in the history of culture have we seen such brilliance!!!!) a girl who o.d'ed getting stabbed in the heart with a giant needle filled with adrenalin, jumping up and, when asked to say something, says "something" in a rather nonplussed fashion--followed by a "whoa...that's trippy" from one of the other participants. (that rawks, man! even more than when i'm watching the real beavis and butthead!!!) killers on their way to assassinate someone speaking of such banalities as a quarter pounder with cheese being called a royale du fromage in france. (did you see how the boy king managed to make his killers a thousand times more awesomely hitmenlike by juxtaposing their murderous activities with mcdonalds' cheeseburgers--brilliantly referencing an american cultural icon along the way?!!) tarantino cannot for one moment resist the compulsion to punch you in the face with his brass knuckles of irony. the violence in "pulp fiction" and "natural born killers" clearly resides in the realm of self-indulgence. he makes his characters commit outrageously violent acts with not only ironic indifference, but with shocking detachment, which of course is meant to show not just how badass they are, but to shock the viewer into a kind of slack-jawed awe. when he won an academy award for "pulp fiction," he and his friend abruptly wrapped up their thoroughly inelegant acceptance comments--as it could hardly have been called a speech--with the decidedly juvenile comment, "if you'll excuse me now, i have to go pee." oh well. with these guys, it's either cinematic urination or cinematic masturbation.… Expand

0 of 7 users found this helpful

1

JSJan 8, 2008

Amoral garbage. Most people don't understand this because a) Tarantino, though repulsively glib, has a rare gift; b) this gift is for making slicker than slick movies that don't bear a moment's reflection; and c) most people Amoral garbage. Most people don't understand this because a) Tarantino, though repulsively glib, has a rare gift; b) this gift is for making slicker than slick movies that don't bear a moment's reflection; and c) most people don't like reflecting on the kind of bloodbaths Tarantino offers here.… Expand

0 of 9 users found this helpful

1

KenL.Sep 12, 2006

[***SPOILERs***] I'm not a prude. i liked "the godfather." and john carpenter's "the thing," which registers pretty darn high on the gore scale, is one of my all-time favorite movies. but "pulp fiction" is cinematic masturbation at[***SPOILERs***] I'm not a prude. i liked "the godfather." and john carpenter's "the thing," which registers pretty darn high on the gore scale, is one of my all-time favorite movies. but "pulp fiction" is cinematic masturbation at its most juvenile. it's one long series of self-indulgent gangland fantasies as seen through the eyes of someone who us under the impression that combining irony with violence equals brilliance. it's uncannily similar to when a young person figures out how to be sarcastic. he/she will revel in his/her newfound powers of irony at every opportunity, until it becomes a matter of sheer self-indulgence. see such film triumphs as these: a righteous african american quoting the bible as he riddles the bodies of young men with enough lead to shield superman's gonads from the motherlode of kryptonite. (oh my god, best movie of all time!!!) a sadistic inbred freak getting a taste of his own sodomy...from a righteous black man who moments before was on the receiving end of the same prescription. (never before in the history of culture have we seen such brilliance!!!!) a girl who o.d'ed getting stabbed in the heart with a giant needle filled with adrenalin, jumping up and, when asked to say something, says "something" in a rather nonplussed fashion--followed by a "whoa...that's trippy" from one of the other participants. (that rawks, man! even more than when i'm watching the real beavis and butthead!!!) killers on their way to assassinate someone speaking of such banalities as a quarter pounder with cheese being called a royale du fromage in france. (did you see how the boy king managed to make his killers a thousand times more awesomely hitmenlike by juxtaposing their murderous activities with mcdonalds' cheeseburgers--brilliantly referencing an american cultural icon along the way?!!) tarantino cannot for one moment resist the compulsion to punch you in the face with his brass knuckles of irony. the violence in "pulp fiction" and "natural born killers" clearly resides in the realm of self-indulgence. he makes his characters commit outrageously violent acts with not only ironic indifference, but with shocking detachment, which of course is meant to show not just how badass they are, but to shock the viewer into a kind of slack-jawed awe. when he won an academy award for "pulp fiction," he and his friend abruptly wrapped up their thoroughly inelegant acceptance comments--as it could hardly have been called a speech--with the decidedly juvenile comment, "if you'll excuse me now, i have to go pee." oh well. with these guys, it's either cinematic urination or cinematic masturbation.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful

1

Anonymous777Sep 12, 2014

95% of this acclaimed film is detestable: the script, plot, cinematography and of course, Tarantino. The only thing that redeems this film from utter failure is the acting, mostly on the part of Christopher Walken, Samuel L. Jackson and95% of this acclaimed film is detestable: the script, plot, cinematography and of course, Tarantino. The only thing that redeems this film from utter failure is the acting, mostly on the part of Christopher Walken, Samuel L. Jackson and Harvey Keitel.… Expand

0 of 5 users found this helpful05

All this user's reviews

1

dogtorFeb 26, 2021

A ridiculous show with a more ridiculous screenplay that has become popular only because of the famous actors in the film.‌‌

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

0

PamL.May 20, 2006

I went to see this movie with my husband when it first came out. I found it so disgusting and frankly boring that for the first (and only time in my life) I walked out of the theater after about 20 minutes. While my husband watched, I struck I went to see this movie with my husband when it first came out. I found it so disgusting and frankly boring that for the first (and only time in my life) I walked out of the theater after about 20 minutes. While my husband watched, I struck up a much more fascinating conversation in the lobby with an older usher from the U.K. who had been a jockey.… Expand

1 of 24 users found this helpful

0

CKDec 26, 2007

We are movie fanatics who watched this cinematic pile of crap with seven other people ranging in age from 22 to 86. We watch a lot of movies in all genres, and we all thought it was the most overrated piece of vulgar garbage with gratuitous We are movie fanatics who watched this cinematic pile of crap with seven other people ranging in age from 22 to 86. We watch a lot of movies in all genres, and we all thought it was the most overrated piece of vulgar garbage with gratuitous violence, foul language, and on top of it, waaaay too boring. Don't know what deep thought anyone is talking about. We have removed this from our collection. BTW, I have never given a movie a 0 before, and we have over 2000 movies in our collection. I echo those who say stay away.....… Expand

0 of 13 users found this helpful

0

nashville13Nov 2, 2011

apparently,this movie has been overatted by the critics.this movie's really an incorrigible and incoherant rubbish. i call this movie a "ROTTEN FICTION".

7 of 24 users found this helpful717

All this user's reviews

0

MaricaSep 2, 2014

I know, everyone says it's a good movie. Yes it is, but not my type. I tried to watch it 2-3 times but I can not resist. Something attracts me at all, not at all, I get bored so fast ... No offense, it is my opinion

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

0

SHANKROIDFeb 16, 2013

Ok, so this is the famous Tarantino masterpiece everyone is talking about. Ok, for starters, I thought the scene selection thing on my dvd was on random mode. People were dead in one scene then all of a sudden alive in the next. It didn'tOk, so this is the famous Tarantino masterpiece everyone is talking about. Ok, for starters, I thought the scene selection thing on my dvd was on random mode. People were dead in one scene then all of a sudden alive in the next. It didn't make sense and I was so confused I was a little sick in my stomach. Also, the movie was very racist, with Tarantino's script using the nasty word as much as he could. One of them even gets bummed. Everyone in this seems hell bent on using drugs, violence, racism of fatty fast food to get by. This may be how life was depicted in 1994 but it's a whole nother story in 2013. Get with the times, people...… Expand

1 of 35 users found this helpful134

All this user's reviews

0

SEROJJan 25, 2015

What the f222 was this sh7t? This is the worst movie i've ever seen! What a mind f777! And how the f999 this movie has this high scores? F777 the academy awards!

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

0

ProctoriousJul 23, 2015

This is one of the most overrated movies ever made, I neither like this movie or think it is good or edge, people need to get over Tarantino as he is far from a good writer or director, terrible movie.

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

0

JackTormentor54Jun 24, 2017

This movie is the absolute waste of time! All the time just "blah, blah ..." and without any particular meaning. I understood almost the deepest meaning of this film, but I can not say that I found some high importance...

I wonder why thisThis movie is the absolute waste of time! All the time just "blah, blah ..." and without any particular meaning. I understood almost the deepest meaning of this film, but I can not say that I found some high importance...

I wonder why this film has so much high score in I.M.D.B. and Metacritic.… Expand

5 of 12 users found this helpful57

All this user's reviews

0

hatepulpfictionFeb 12, 2020

This movie is absolutely dog actually trash movie written by a bunch of idiotic monkeys how could anybody watch this horrible film and live to tell the tale im pretty sure this picture gave me stage five suicidal thoughts i literally want toThis movie is absolutely dog actually trash movie written by a bunch of idiotic monkeys how could anybody watch this horrible film and live to tell the tale im pretty sure this picture gave me stage five suicidal thoughts i literally want to die after viewing this film do not watch it. terrible writing, bad screenplay. and even worse character development. another dumpster fire by quentin another horrible production in the books… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

0

MRafayelAug 12, 2020

No meaning, no scenario, not funny at all. This movie is just an overrated waste of time.

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

0

AnxerFeb 22, 2022

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Puta mierda

.........,.........mmmmmmmmmmmbgrcjkdk jxjskxjdjfksinxjdlwjfnsjdbslcjsnx… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

Pulp Fiction

User Reviews