Warner Bros. Pictures | Release Date: May 12, 2006
5.9
USER SCORE
Mixed or average reviews based on 158 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
67
Mixed:
54
Negative:
37
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
6
bfoore90Sep 1, 2019
The visuals are impressive and the actors do their best to work through the script. I've seen worse disaster films, Poseidon was entertaining for being a loose remake.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
jonslowJan 11, 2019
A remake is not always an automatic negative. The visuals are quite impressive, and if you look beyond some mediocre acting, you actually may be entertained.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
PeterJ.Jan 27, 2007
The beginning of the movie was great, but the rest of it was predictably boring at best. I actually left the room a few times without pausing it. I was expecting a better story line. You knew exactly what was going to happen.
0 of 1 users found this helpful
6
EdQ.May 30, 2006
For those expecting acting that rivals Schindler's List, shame on you. This was a big-budget adventure that fell short of being at all memorable. You go in, enjoy the action, leave, and then make like a goldfish with a 7 second memory. For those expecting acting that rivals Schindler's List, shame on you. This was a big-budget adventure that fell short of being at all memorable. You go in, enjoy the action, leave, and then make like a goldfish with a 7 second memory. Dreyfus' acting is a shining point, and Russel and Rossum handle themselves well along with him. Otherwise, the acting is as expected, where the main discretionary command at the casting call was, "OK, now pretend like you're drowning, and look hot doing it!" Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
PaulK.May 8, 2006
Slightly above average popcorn flick. The special effects are top notch and the suspense is at full throttle, but there should have been more character development. I had no invested interest in whether these people lived or died, apart from Slightly above average popcorn flick. The special effects are top notch and the suspense is at full throttle, but there should have been more character development. I had no invested interest in whether these people lived or died, apart from Jimmy Bennett's character. His role was an annoying plot device identical to what he played in Firewall. Cliche, anyone? Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
JohnB.Sep 19, 2006
Movie sets = 8; realistic looking sets CG FXs = 5 (day FX) 8 (night FX) 6.5 (combination score) Script = 3; a bit choppy at times Acting = 8; considering a weak script Action = 9; the action kept me interested This wasn't a bad action Movie sets = 8; realistic looking sets CG FXs = 5 (day FX) 8 (night FX) 6.5 (combination score) Script = 3; a bit choppy at times Acting = 8; considering a weak script Action = 9; the action kept me interested This wasn't a bad action movie to watch, and I have no regrets seeing it on DVD, but they may have tried to cram too much of everything into the movie. There wasn't much time for the viewer to get to know and bond to the characters. The viewer was lead from one danger after another danger, after another danger. It felt like 'Fear Factor: The movie'. Everything felt hurried. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
MaseMay 18, 2006
Quick and painless summer fare, plain old fashion disaster filck. If you are looking for anything else with say depth. Go elsewhere. Visuals are fantastic, characters are merely there to get thrown around by water nothing else.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
eTurkeyMay 3, 2012
One half of me says to continue watching this film, the other half thinks it should sink dead in the water and I should flip on something else. For an action/disaster movie 'Poseidon' is rather, well... safe. And easy to foretell. PredictableOne half of me says to continue watching this film, the other half thinks it should sink dead in the water and I should flip on something else. For an action/disaster movie 'Poseidon' is rather, well... safe. And easy to foretell. Predictable at best to be perfectly honest. It's neither boring nor bland and some of the "escape" scenes are well directed but overall this feature offers nothing new in the genre. Truth be told, pick a side (heads or tails) and then throw a coin in the air to determine this picture's fate because it honestly could go either way. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
beingryanjudeAug 24, 2014
A remake is not always an automatic negative. The visuals are quite impressive, and if you look beyond some mediocre acting, you actually may be entertained.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
csw12Sep 2, 2012
A pretty pathetic movie with cliches over all the place. the acting was below average as well as the writing but at least the action and visuals were good.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
morfilJun 13, 2013
I really enjoyed this movie. I cannot understand all the negative comments associated with it at all. If you go and watch a movie called Poseidon you should expect to see a big ship go belly up and then a fight for survival and that isI really enjoyed this movie. I cannot understand all the negative comments associated with it at all. If you go and watch a movie called Poseidon you should expect to see a big ship go belly up and then a fight for survival and that is exactly what we get. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
gracjanskiApr 2, 2021
The visual effects are top, even today. But the story, characters and dialogues are superficial, so even though the movie is short it is somehow boring.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
CineAutoctonoJul 25, 2015
This film is a farce , because it is another boat but superapara anything Titanic pelicua , and what Poseidon is a fictional ship and ran aground head , and the Titanic had split in two and Titanic is longer than this filth . Titanic is theThis film is a farce , because it is another boat but superapara anything Titanic pelicua , and what Poseidon is a fictional ship and ran aground head , and the Titanic had split in two and Titanic is longer than this filth . Titanic is the clear winner. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
SrPepeJul 8, 2018
No es una película mala, es divertida y tiene sus momentos muy buenos, como todas las del género es bastante irreal.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
FilipeNetoDec 30, 2018
This movie is a remake of another, older film about a luxury ship that turns on the high seas, because of a giant wave. Of course, it is a killing that tries to escape a small group where the heroes are, in what appears to be the most riskyThis movie is a remake of another, older film about a luxury ship that turns on the high seas, because of a giant wave. Of course, it is a killing that tries to escape a small group where the heroes are, in what appears to be the most risky of plans: to go out into the open air by the bottom of the ship.

Technically, the film is much more evolved than its predecessor. Times are different, the ways to achieve visual and special effects have evolved. It's normal. The film raises a question of CGI and effects, visual and sound, as it happens with the majority of the films of catastrophes. The cinematography is careful and the scenery of the ship, with all its beauty and grandeur (even when destroyed), is impressive and the whole film is a race against sea water, which is always on the trail of the characters ... but basically That's it!

The oldest film, a 1972 classic, can still be better. It does not have the grandeur of digital effects but it makes up for everything else. To make matters worse, the new movie can not bring anything new, completely copy the previous story. As for the cast, it plays a satisfying role, but it does not shine. The characters do not have as much depth as in the first film, but the constant sense of danger allows the audience to sympathize with all of them. Josh Lucas is pretty good, but his character, initially unpleasant and somewhat arrogant, may prevent some audiences from building empathy. Kurt Russell is exactly the opposite, and we sympathize with him soon, but he is not at his best here because of the lack of material that the actor can work on. Richard Dreyfuss did well on a nice but minor character and Emmy Rossum tried to be more than just a damsel in distress.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews