Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest

6

MarkSJul 10, 2006

While Depp was great himself, he had little to do or work with. Sparrow had none of the clever and one-upsmanship of the first movie. His actions were almost inconsequential to everything that was going on. He did nothing so cool as toWhile Depp was great himself, he had little to do or work with. Sparrow had none of the clever and one-upsmanship of the first movie. His actions were almost inconsequential to everything that was going on. He did nothing so cool as to warrant his great line from #1 "Lads, I'm Jack Sparrow". He was a bumbling coward, and the question of loyalty to the other 2 leads should have been left for dead in the first movie, or always cloudy what he was up to until the end, like in Black Pearl. This one, he is an unabashed selfish jerk and traitor. No depth, no color. All the jokes seemed very much contrived, not smooth and natural like the first film. Big disappointment. Depp, Knightly, the voodoo chic were good, action was so so with a few real bright spots. The rum jokes were easily the best.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

NathanJul 10, 2006

One of the worst movies I've seen so far this summer. It was slow, boring, and overly long. This movie was a huge dissappointment. Don't go to the theater to see it. Wait til dvd, or better yet don't see it at all.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

4

JuniorL.Jul 10, 2006

A complete waste of Johnny Depp's talent and he's the only reason to see, although Orlando Bloom has potential. When your characters have to explain what is going on in the movie, you know you're in over your head. They could A complete waste of Johnny Depp's talent and he's the only reason to see, although Orlando Bloom has potential. When your characters have to explain what is going on in the movie, you know you're in over your head. They could have easily deleted about a 1/3 of this movie and it would have been barely entertaining. I was a big fan of the first Pirate's and the first to see this on Friday and I will definitely tell everyone I know, not to waste their time and $10. They can rent it and do laundry while they have it on in the background and they won't miss much. At least the popcorn was good.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

TheCriticJul 10, 2006

God AWFUL!!!! Whoever liked the first won't like this piece of crap that has WAY to many corny jokes and a confusing plotline. The only plus for it was Johnny Depp's awesome performance as Sparrow.

1 of 3 users found this helpful

10

JonnyBoyJul 10, 2006

Awesome movie. Not as good as the first.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

3

BeciyW.Jul 10, 2006

Great effects, just too much of them. This very long half of a movie (the other half will be coming along soon) could have used a clearer plotline and been an hour shorter. I hope the island witch-doctor lady isn't back for the third Great effects, just too much of them. This very long half of a movie (the other half will be coming along soon) could have used a clearer plotline and been an hour shorter. I hope the island witch-doctor lady isn't back for the third movie, or that they give her subtitles; I couldn't understand a word she said in her island accent. Next time, more Depp, less schlep!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

10

HadenJul 10, 2006

I thought it hit the spot not like that boring Superman Returns with its wooden indian acting and no plot. Pirates is great all around fun and the action is non stop. Johnny Depp as Captain Jack Sparrow steals the screen each and every time I thought it hit the spot not like that boring Superman Returns with its wooden indian acting and no plot. Pirates is great all around fun and the action is non stop. Johnny Depp as Captain Jack Sparrow steals the screen each and every time he appears. The rest of the cast is essentially worthless. I wish it had gone on and on as the audience I watched it with loved it. Great popcorn fun. Don't miss it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

CharlesL.Jul 10, 2006

I love the way all the dissenting opinions for this movie appear to be well thought out critiques, where as the positive votes read like PR-cookie-cutter-praise-em-post-em notes. I never was into the whole POTC thing. I never went to see the I love the way all the dissenting opinions for this movie appear to be well thought out critiques, where as the positive votes read like PR-cookie-cutter-praise-em-post-em notes. I never was into the whole POTC thing. I never went to see the first movie. Not interested. That said, I saw it on cable eventually some lazy Sunday afternoon and was wonderfully entertained. "Wow" was the word that came to mind. I had misjudged the movie, and was pleasantly surprised at how fun the movie was. So, now we have a sequel. I went to a later showing tonight to help avoid most of the youngsters in the crowd, and still the movie was jam packed with patrons. And so began our next ride on Disney's flagship voyage. 2 1/2 hours later I am so bored, I left the theatre as soon as the first credit rolled. I understand there are 10 extra seconds at the end. Who cares is all I can say. The movie is one incredibly long overbloated setup for the third installment. Characters seem to be out of touch with their characters from the first movie, I cared more for the villian than I did our heroes, the Kraken was used too many times. The beach scene was 10 min too long. Have no idea what the heck was up with the cannibal Sparrow scene? (I mean why would you possibly think cannabilism could be utilized as a crude joke is beyond me.) There were some great action sequences, although I agree with one reviewer who stated that so much action was present on screen that you felt as though you were wrapped in psychadelic wallpaper. (And I don't think he meant that as a compliment ;-) I also perceived the dialog as difficult to make out at times. Whether that was a function of the mix or extreme dialect slurring I am not sure. But I found myself several times wishing I could back up the movie with my remote to catch what was just stated. CGI effects were pretty amazing on Davy Jones! The kraken was pretty cool as well. I found the villian to be the most compelling character. At least he was honorable and true to self. Overall though, I still have to stick to my main points. Laboriously long, weak script, horrible plot elements and character asassinations. You know..Jack Sparrow won our hearts in the first movie. Why would you now seek to cause audiences to re-evaluate that opinion? Tasting a toe?? Obstensibly throwing away peoples lives he had already saved? Being forced to take the higher road by a deceitful womanly misdirection? Preferring to root for the villian than the so called "heroes" is not a good idea Hollywood. Ehh. Spend your money. Perhaps you will like it. Ultimately I felt let down and a bit irritated with the whole experience. The pacing was all off for me.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

9

JeffW.Jul 10, 2006

Whoaaa! Give me a break p-l-e-a-s-e-! Okay, it's not as good as the first (10) but they never are. It is a close second however and definitely does not deserve anything less than that. I watched it last night, came home and seen that Whoaaa! Give me a break p-l-e-a-s-e-! Okay, it's not as good as the first (10) but they never are. It is a close second however and definitely does not deserve anything less than that. I watched it last night, came home and seen that this movie broke the record three-day take for any movie ever. The people have voiced their opinion. The critics and their ilk need to lighten up! :)… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

JohnnyB.Jul 10, 2006

I had a very hard time sitting through this movie. It was all over the place, frenzied, but not fun. I gave it a 1 because the visuals were sometimes good, but if not for that i would give it a zero. Painful to sit through once, and i I had a very hard time sitting through this movie. It was all over the place, frenzied, but not fun. I gave it a 1 because the visuals were sometimes good, but if not for that i would give it a zero. Painful to sit through once, and i won't subject myself to Pirates3.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

9

MichaelC.Jul 10, 2006

I Agree totally with Jack H. who states wisely that this movie cannot stand alone! it is the 2nd movie of a trilogy, and does just what it is supposed to do...keep you entertained and build up to the 3rd. Of course its not better than the I Agree totally with Jack H. who states wisely that this movie cannot stand alone! it is the 2nd movie of a trilogy, and does just what it is supposed to do...keep you entertained and build up to the 3rd. Of course its not better than the 1st because the first is fresh and new. Though it is lacking plot, and gets a whole lot of nowhere for its 2 1/2 hours...Its FUN! no 2nd movie has ever been the best of the trilogy...all it does is build up to the 3rd, and give a lot of action and laughs to get you there. A Great Film!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

1

JimM.Jul 9, 2006

What a BAD BAD movie! They should have stopped with the first one, which was good. This was was HORRIBLE. The best word I can think of is GROSS. I haven't seen this must gross crap on a movie screen since...I don't remember What a BAD BAD movie! They should have stopped with the first one, which was good. This was was HORRIBLE. The best word I can think of is GROSS. I haven't seen this must gross crap on a movie screen since...I don't remember anything this bad! Too bad so many people wasted their money on this crap, it would have been better spent on the fabulous Superman Returns, a movie with heart and soul, this waste of film has neither. A typical Ameircan summer waste of time...… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

AaronF.Jul 9, 2006

I can definitely say this was a great movie. I personally wasn't too excited about seeing it as many people were as despite liking the first movie, I never became some hardcore fan like many did. Like Jack said, it's not the best I can definitely say this was a great movie. I personally wasn't too excited about seeing it as many people were as despite liking the first movie, I never became some hardcore fan like many did. Like Jack said, it's not the best stand-alone movie, but like many trillogies it's there because now there's a continuing story that will end in the third. I'm not going to complain, and PotC actually contained an entertaining plot. Simply put, yeah it could be a better movie, but it's an amazing trilogy. Definately a little darker, but the humor for me hit every time. Great movie and I liked the faster pacing with more things happening in it and a little more action. I honestly think I would rather watch this one again rather than the first.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

GeraldB.Jul 9, 2006

Just blobs of colour squiggling onscreen and words shooting back and forth unintelligibly. Sitting in a cinema watching PIRATES 2 was like being wrapped in a triple -length roll of very loud wallpaper.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JamesG.Jul 9, 2006

It does what it is supposed to do and is honorable in its pursuit.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

ScottN.Jul 9, 2006

Not as good as the first and too many tangled plot points, but action-packed (after the first 20 minutes) and satisfying eye-candy.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

JorgeS.Jul 9, 2006

THE most unintelligible and completely cofusing plot ever, the whole movie felt like it was thrown together with various dandy action sequences. Granted, they were fantastic, but at least the ones in Black Pearl served a purpose (did we THE most unintelligible and completely cofusing plot ever, the whole movie felt like it was thrown together with various dandy action sequences. Granted, they were fantastic, but at least the ones in Black Pearl served a purpose (did we realy have to see the octopus more than twice?) All in all, the only reason to see this movie is for the amazing action sequences and Johnny Depp's awesome role as Jack Sparrow, which were enough to propel my score to a six. If none of these things interest you, i suggest you skip it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JackH.Jul 9, 2006

A terrific film simply in its change from the original. Rather than using the formula of many film series by making it just Curse of the Black Pearl with a different villain and more characters (which it seems at first), the film instead A terrific film simply in its change from the original. Rather than using the formula of many film series by making it just Curse of the Black Pearl with a different villain and more characters (which it seems at first), the film instead reinvents every element used in the original and simply adds to it. I have already seen it twice, and like the first, it can't be viewed just once. The main flaw in this film is the same as any second film in a planned trilogy: it cannot stand alone eg. Back to the Future Part II, The Empire Strikes Back. That said, it works brilliantly in the way it was intended: it gives us a more in depth look at the characters in play to prepare us for the final film.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

StephS.Jul 9, 2006

I thought that Johnny Depp was the absolutley FANTASTIC. He made the movie. Loved it. :)

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

LanieJ.Jul 9, 2006

A big let down after the first one - illogical plot, no humor or good fun like the first, and unintelligible dialogue at times. I left the theater queasy and uninterested. A shame after how great Pirates 1 was.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

BritneyB.Jul 9, 2006

IMO, this movie actually deserves a 9, but I think a lot of people were too hard on it. I found Dead Man's Chest to be everything I hoped it would be. There are plenty of laughs, and amazing quotes. Like Pirates 1, having Johnny Depp IMO, this movie actually deserves a 9, but I think a lot of people were too hard on it. I found Dead Man's Chest to be everything I hoped it would be. There are plenty of laughs, and amazing quotes. Like Pirates 1, having Johnny Depp could most likely make or break the movie (at least at the box office). However, I found Orlando's acting to be a big improvement over his decent, but not outstanding, performance in the first film, especially in the scenes with 'Bootstrap' Bill. The plot and character development was impressive, and the feeling of randomness that you get from skipping around from character to character adds to the film, as long as you're paying attention and can keep up. I have seen the movie twice already (once at midnight on the 7th) and can't wait to see it a few more times in theatres!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

AlexI.Jul 9, 2006

For all the ecstatic reviews on this site, I can only offer the following anecdote. I saw this movie at midnight on Thursday. The theater was packed, people were dressed up in costume, 80% of the audience hardcore fans of the movie. Maybe For all the ecstatic reviews on this site, I can only offer the following anecdote. I saw this movie at midnight on Thursday. The theater was packed, people were dressed up in costume, 80% of the audience hardcore fans of the movie. Maybe three people clapped at the end of it out of over 150 in the audience and everyone filed out as quickly as possible. There wasn't the kind of excited buzz that follows the opening of a good/fun movie, just a lot of discontented grumbling about how late it was. I can't even claim it was entertaining.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

PaulB.Jul 9, 2006

Long and boring. Not a funny as the first one and much darker.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

8

MichelleC.Jul 9, 2006

Not as good as the first, but this is a fun and entertaining movie. Johnny Depp is amazing as always and has incredible chemistry with Kiera Knightly. I would caution parents with young children as this can be gross and graphic. Special Not as good as the first, but this is a fun and entertaining movie. Johnny Depp is amazing as always and has incredible chemistry with Kiera Knightly. I would caution parents with young children as this can be gross and graphic. Special effects are delightful and action sequences very satisfying. For those of you who like movies to have a clear cut ending it does not come here. I get that there is another sequel coming, but still thought this one deserved a better finish.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

KevinM.Jul 9, 2006

This movie is way too long for what it is. I was so looking forward to it but walked away with a "so what" attitude. The dialogue was, at times, very hard to understand. The movie relied a lot on the first one, which I haven't seen for This movie is way too long for what it is. I was so looking forward to it but walked away with a "so what" attitude. The dialogue was, at times, very hard to understand. The movie relied a lot on the first one, which I haven't seen for several years, so many of the "surprises" left me dumbfounded. I'm sure the ending was provocative if you knew who the guy coming down the steps is.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

GeneW.Jul 9, 2006

Overly long, overly noisy, this sequel is nothing more than a two and a half hour trailer for the third installment of the franchise. Dead Man's Chest has a slow beginning, a bloated middle and no end. It's the worst kind of movie Overly long, overly noisy, this sequel is nothing more than a two and a half hour trailer for the third installment of the franchise. Dead Man's Chest has a slow beginning, a bloated middle and no end. It's the worst kind of movie making, a crass ploy to get us back for No. 3. A waste of time and money.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

JoeAverageJul 9, 2006

A welcome way to escape the heat on a Saturday afternoon, just don't expect to remember much of the film the following morning. Despite all its wasted potential, X-men 3 had at least some resonant scenes.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

Bebop717Jul 9, 2006

For those you have not seen it look forward to the cannibal island. That is about 30 mins of material that could totally be cut, it's totally filler that has nothing to do with the entire movie. Actually most of the movie is filler and For those you have not seen it look forward to the cannibal island. That is about 30 mins of material that could totally be cut, it's totally filler that has nothing to do with the entire movie. Actually most of the movie is filler and is filled with side plots. It's just a summer action fluff movie with bad writing, does anyone remember a single memorable quote? Of course you can't because 1) there are none and 2) Practically everyone is a pirate in the movie which means that is overall much harder to understand them.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

DavidJul 9, 2006

Pure Popcorn. Loved it. Just go and enjoy. Johnny Depp is magic as Captain Jack Sparrow.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

TracyB.Jul 9, 2006

Not a bad movie- Johnny Depp was great, again. The make up, special effects and sets were fantastic. But, like King Kong (although better) it was over the top with too many of the action scenes that dragged on and should have been cut down- Not a bad movie- Johnny Depp was great, again. The make up, special effects and sets were fantastic. But, like King Kong (although better) it was over the top with too many of the action scenes that dragged on and should have been cut down- needed a more developed story.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

TheoL.Jul 9, 2006

Don't buy into all the negative and lukewarm reviews the "professional" critics are giving this film. Dead Man's Chest is an absolute blast!

2 of 2 users found this helpful

10

AaronJul 9, 2006

In a single word: Fantastic.

2 of 3 users found this helpful

9

NavneetS.Jul 9, 2006

An absolutely underrated movie! I loved it!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

TyeN.Jul 9, 2006

I'm so very disappointed by this film. Before I went to see it, I re-watched the original. Even though I've seen the first 'Pirates' many times, I still laughed and found some of the set pieces exciting. However, "Dead I'm so very disappointed by this film. Before I went to see it, I re-watched the original. Even though I've seen the first 'Pirates' many times, I still laughed and found some of the set pieces exciting. However, "Dead Man's Chest" tries to do too much while not doing enough at the same time. It sounds confusing, but here's what I mean: Too much pointless action sequences (the ones that really bothered me were the many Kraken ones), too many split plot lines, too long of a running time. And there wasn't enough plot or character development (especially for Bootstrap Bill, Will Turner, Elizabeth Swan, Davy Jones, and the new character Lord Bennington), not enough laughs (it tries, but many jokes come off as lame), not enough fun (much of the film actually feels like work to watch.) Although there are enjoyable moments (the cannibal island, just looking at the awesome CG, the big fight near the end of the film for the chest) there just weren't enough. I wanted to love, but I only ended up kinda liking it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

KyleH.Jul 9, 2006

Just watched the first movie last week and saw Dead Man's Chest tonight and I loved it. It's going down as one of my favorites!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

MarkA.Jul 9, 2006

This movie was so GOOD! Ive seen it twice and cant wait for a third! Like others have said, I dont know what movie the critics saw because it wasnt this one...it might be too long for some people but I didnt feel it, its the most fun This movie was so GOOD! Ive seen it twice and cant wait for a third! Like others have said, I dont know what movie the critics saw because it wasnt this one...it might be too long for some people but I didnt feel it, its the most fun you'll have at the theater this summer...and the last minute will blow you away!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

DaniA.Jul 9, 2006

Coming into the movie theater I was ready for another spine tingling beginning like the first, hearing a little girls quiet voice over the waves, singing the song that you would most likely hear at a bar, in an innocent, almost dreamy Coming into the movie theater I was ready for another spine tingling beginning like the first, hearing a little girls quiet voice over the waves, singing the song that you would most likely hear at a bar, in an innocent, almost dreamy manner, "Yo, ho, Yo, ho a pirates life for me...." Instead, we start off with Elizabeth, standing sopping wet in the pouring rain, at what we almost instantly know is a wedding, her wedding. At first I'm thinking, "where are all the guests?", then, "has she been stood up at the alter?" then, "...what? But what jolted me out of my confusion, and into pure dumbfoundment was a mob of English soldiers storming through the large doors with Will, and I'm still not sure whats happening! The entire movie draged on for WAYY longer than it should, and then at the end I came out wondering what the heck everyone had said! The dialouge was completely incoherent, I literally could not understand a word that some of the pirates uttered! All I have to say is that this was a catastrophy and that (unlike Pirates 1) I would not go see it again.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

4

ChanelB.Jul 8, 2006

As much as I loved the first movie, the only thing that I can say to describe "Dead Man's Chest" is that it let me down tremendously. I love Johnny Depp so you can imagine how hard it is for me to say this but, I was getting tired of As much as I loved the first movie, the only thing that I can say to describe "Dead Man's Chest" is that it let me down tremendously. I love Johnny Depp so you can imagine how hard it is for me to say this but, I was getting tired of his character. As well as that, I felt as though I had seen it all before! For instance, when Will goes searching for Jack and there is the sequence where he is asking around Tortuga to see if anyone knows where the famous Capitan Sparrow is, and he meets up with two minor woman roles from the first movie, who smack Will and tell him to send that message to Jack......Hasn't that happened a couple of times already? Do we have to play it out some more? The answer is yes. I also realized that the chemistry between Elizabeth and Will was nothing like the first movie's was. Sure, we had the quick "oh, you're back from Davie Jones Locker!" kiss, but honestly! In Pirates 1, Will and Lizzy were the scandelous, romantic couple, but that was completely gone by this movie. Some people may think that since "the compass that shows what you want most in the world" pointed to Jack, when Lizzy was holding it on the Island where Davie hid his heart, it is another shocking plot point! But seriously, do we need another? This movie was so jam-packed with them that I couldn't get Will's father and Davie Jones strait! Overall, this movie was not what I was looking for at 12:00 at night, or any other time for that matter.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

BlackA.Jul 8, 2006

I saw POTC:DMC this evening and I loved the film. I left the theatre wanting more and ready for the next installment. . .immediately. It's funny, I didn't go into the theatre with high expectations, somewhat mindful of the the I saw POTC:DMC this evening and I loved the film. I left the theatre wanting more and ready for the next installment. . .immediately. It's funny, I didn't go into the theatre with high expectations, somewhat mindful of the the lackluster movie reviews in the press. Having said that, I have no idea what crawled up the collective a**es of the majority of the movie critics and got caught in their sphincters. I guess some of them have no sense of fun or something.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JeremyJul 8, 2006

Absolutely loved it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JimA.Jul 8, 2006

I have no idea what movie the critics saw but it wasn't this one. It was different than the first yeah, but that's to be expected from a sequel because more of the same is boring. This one was darker, creepier, and had more plot I have no idea what movie the critics saw but it wasn't this one. It was different than the first yeah, but that's to be expected from a sequel because more of the same is boring. This one was darker, creepier, and had more plot than the first one and it works gorgeously. To those that believe that CG ruined the movie- would you rather they used puppets and end up making it look like a bad 1970s movie? Didn't think so. The length is fine- bigger tales mean longer screen times, and I was never bored once. All the actors are just as good (even better probably) than they were in the first movie and the dialogue is really good, something that is definitely lacking in movies these days. There was nothing bad about this film at all, don't listen to the haters, go give Gore Verbinski more money.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

SherryB.Jul 8, 2006

Very good speacial effects but I hate movies that leave you hanging.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

DavidG.Jul 8, 2006

In my opinion the first quarter of the movie lacked the PoTC finesse which the first movie showed so brilliantly, but it was still interesting albeit it was a little confusing here and there. The rest of the movie was sheer brilliance as it In my opinion the first quarter of the movie lacked the PoTC finesse which the first movie showed so brilliantly, but it was still interesting albeit it was a little confusing here and there. The rest of the movie was sheer brilliance as it was polished all around. It had action perhpas better than any movies so far this year, an excellent atmosphere, some nicely thrown in humor, and an overall pleasing storyline. So if you were a fan of PoTC 1, do yourself a favour, and go see this movie. PS: Hahah hey Carson, camping was awesome!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

ChuckyoJul 8, 2006

The first half of the film drags, but the second half is great. The film definitely could have been cut down to a shorter running time.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

RaoG.Jul 8, 2006

The first movie was a revivial of the swashbuckling genre, bringing the right combination of action, comedy, drama, and characters making it a masterpiece. This movie need more time in development before it's release. The action The first movie was a revivial of the swashbuckling genre, bringing the right combination of action, comedy, drama, and characters making it a masterpiece. This movie need more time in development before it's release. The action sequences are silly and poorly shot, with over the top action in which characters are never in any real peral. The reliance of computer animated action sequences watered down the movie more dramatic moments. The entire movie was a simple set-up for the next, while at the same time doing absolutely no justice to the fantastic cast of characters established by the brilliant cast. The script lacked the magic of the original with dialogue that seemed to make a pale attempt to copy the original. The positives are the new charcters, who seem to all overshadow the main cast, the revival of the supporting cast of pirates, and the final shot of the movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

CarsonS.Jul 8, 2006

I was camping when the movie came out and i drove 1 and a half hours both ways to go see this and i wasn't disappointed. The action scenes are absolutely spectacular and the story line is quite good. The special effects are superb with I was camping when the movie came out and i drove 1 and a half hours both ways to go see this and i wasn't disappointed. The action scenes are absolutely spectacular and the story line is quite good. The special effects are superb with davy jones and his crew and of course you can never got enough of Jack Sparrows delightful quirkiness.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

SusanS.Jul 8, 2006

I saw the movie last night and was delighted as was the rest of the audience. I had a hard time believing I was watching the same movie the critics have panned. It was great! I'll probably go see it again at least 5 times. The critic I saw the movie last night and was delighted as was the rest of the audience. I had a hard time believing I was watching the same movie the critics have panned. It was great! I'll probably go see it again at least 5 times. The critic from EW in particular needs to have her glasses examined-her review was nasty and way way out of line.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

PaulO.Jul 8, 2006

The movie was OK. The special effects were amazing, though. Yes, a little long and definitely NOT as good as the first one. Worth seeing but maybe not more than once. The first one had replay value, unlike this one.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

StarFoxJul 8, 2006

Unfortunately, it's a mess. Too many over-the-top references to the first one, an overly convoluted story and little memorable except for the effects work. Call it Priates: Reloaded.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

BryceE.Jul 8, 2006

Davy Jones is awesome! Jack Sparrow seemed more goofy than cool, and the movie takes its time to get going, but the scenes featuring Davy Jones are just rad. Best "summer" movie by far. people taking this movie too seriously just need to chill.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

BrettC.Jul 8, 2006

I don't get all the critics on this one... since when is it not enough to be a fun summer movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

CamdenS.Jul 8, 2006

A liitle long but entertaining and fun. some moments of belly aching laughter including a great sequence involving a large mill wheel. The villians are slimy, sleezy, gooey and funny -- the best of all worlds - beneath and above the sea!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

PrattJul 8, 2006

I can't believe i'm hearing all this whining...anyone who claimed to have had a boring time watching this movie must have drunk a fifth of nyquil before sitting down in the theatre. As far as a plot goes yes the story arc is weak, I can't believe i'm hearing all this whining...anyone who claimed to have had a boring time watching this movie must have drunk a fifth of nyquil before sitting down in the theatre. As far as a plot goes yes the story arc is weak, and yes the characters are underdeveloped, but the first one wasn't made famous for script depth...it was made famous because it was so fun to watch. And, you now what, as a sequel it more than delivers back twice of the enjoyment of the first one. Seeing Johnny Depp prancing around and finding himself a new scapegoat is hilarious simply because he plays the part so well. Also anyone who said the CGI was bad surely must need eyeglasses...i found myself fascinated by Davey jones and his nautical cohorts. Also, the Jones character was made even better for me thanks to some spot on voice acting by Bill Nighy. Also, i noticed many complaining about the length of the film, the two plus hours was fine with me, because unlike some bloated superhero film I watched two weeks ago, the pacing was great and I had fun all the way up to Barbosa's second coming. Anyone who enjoyed Supertrash over this needs their head checked. 8 out of 10… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

J.LohmannJul 8, 2006

Great Movir. Depp is fantastic and funny. Finally, a great summer movie!!!!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

ShellyN.Jul 8, 2006

Yes, it was long, but I was thrilled to be watching this entertaining movie the entire time. Movies like this are as essential to summer as a trip to Dairy Queen -- you know it's not the best quality, but for pure fun and escapism it Yes, it was long, but I was thrilled to be watching this entertaining movie the entire time. Movies like this are as essential to summer as a trip to Dairy Queen -- you know it's not the best quality, but for pure fun and escapism it can't be beat. Johnny Depp is excellent, Bill Nighy somehow manages to show his great personality through the craziest prostheic ever and the the supporting pirates are gleefully fun to watch. This isn't trying to be high art, I don't think people should judge it as such.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

BrianA.Jul 8, 2006

I liked the first film enough, but I feel like this movie is just a crude, overlengthy, and boring sequel that was written in a few minutes, and filmed in about as many. Nothing in the film is that impressive, the characters don't I liked the first film enough, but I feel like this movie is just a crude, overlengthy, and boring sequel that was written in a few minutes, and filmed in about as many. Nothing in the film is that impressive, the characters don't really grow or flesh out, and the CGI is second rate. Reminds me of another trilogy of films that started out really great, and then got worse and worse as they went on (Matrix anyone?)… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

9

RichK.Jul 7, 2006

The running time is long and there are a few slow points. That being said I found this sequel to be just as enjoyable as the first. I don't understand why so many critics are panning this film. It is not meant to be anything but a The running time is long and there are a few slow points. That being said I found this sequel to be just as enjoyable as the first. I don't understand why so many critics are panning this film. It is not meant to be anything but a summer popcorn flick. I found the look of this movie to be unique and the special effects are phenominal, plus all that was enjoyable about the first movie is still here. There is a great deal of laughs and action. If you are looking for escapism in its purest form then I highly recommend this film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

JeffreyH.Jul 7, 2006

Good gawd. i just gave yet another 2 hours of my life to that stinking franchise. after the juvenile(a macaw relieving itself on a man's shoulder got the biggest laugh of the night))humor, weak story line and simplistic, plodding scoreGood gawd. i just gave yet another 2 hours of my life to that stinking franchise. after the juvenile(a macaw relieving itself on a man's shoulder got the biggest laugh of the night))humor, weak story line and simplistic, plodding score of the first, i thought i would give the second a chance to redeem the first. not to mention the sublime johnny depp. big mistake. save your money and the hours of lifetime you must commit to viewing this trash. my money and my time are gone, but you have a choice. make the right choice and see another movie like superman returns....yeah, dead man's chest is THAT bad.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

8

ZackL.Jul 7, 2006

Please don't hesitate to watch this fun, entertaining and compelling film!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

JohnB.Jul 7, 2006

Dead Man's Chest was a movie I really tried to like but after two and a half hours in the theater I found this to be no more than mediocre. We are supposed to like Jack Sparrow right? That's why we came to see the movie right? Dead Man's Chest was a movie I really tried to like but after two and a half hours in the theater I found this to be no more than mediocre. We are supposed to like Jack Sparrow right? That's why we came to see the movie right? Well, it was unfortunate to see Depp's character slip towards the endless gags and while the infamous captain we all came to love still brings some great moments I couldn't help but feel like it was stale. Orlando Bloom has yet to impress me as an actor. Perhaps a really nice hat might have been the trick. Keira Kightley brings us everything we had expected in Elizabeth Swann. It's too bad the chemistry between the characters that seemed to work in the first one seems to have been overdone in Dead Man's Chest. There were more awkward moments in this film than there should have been. I enjoyed the salty sea creatures of Davy Jones and the monster they enjoy to unleash, but the action in this movie was far too relentless. The pacing really started to veer off course too much. Also, is it too much to ask for more additions to the score? I would prefer to not to hear a rehash of the same music from the previous movie. Overall, there are enough decent lines to create a new book of pirate phrases with the same wit that made the first movie interesting, but with too much action, unclear character motivations and running gags, Dead Man's Chest verges far too close to collapsing on itself.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

VladimirG.Jul 7, 2006

Poor writing, some poor CGI, poor plot structure and arch, but if I told you I didn't enjoy it I would be lying. Listen, this is a movie based on a theme park ride, so if you're going there to see anything more than cheap yet funny Poor writing, some poor CGI, poor plot structure and arch, but if I told you I didn't enjoy it I would be lying. Listen, this is a movie based on a theme park ride, so if you're going there to see anything more than cheap yet funny jokes and silly action sequences you're probably a moron. I had a great time.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

ColbyS.Jul 7, 2006

True, it wasn't as good as the first and yes, it was about a half hour too long for its own good, but overall, most of the critics who reviewed this were either PMSing or so full of sh.. they had to let it spew out of their mouths to True, it wasn't as good as the first and yes, it was about a half hour too long for its own good, but overall, most of the critics who reviewed this were either PMSing or so full of sh.. they had to let it spew out of their mouths to trash this film. It was rousing enough to keep me awake until it finished at 2:30 AM at the midnight showing; in short, although not Oscar material, it's funny, unpredictable, action-packed- a good summer movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

MartyJ.Jul 7, 2006

A Bigger Version of The First Film, I Didnt like the love triangle between Jack,Elizabeth and Will. Otherwise Just As Enjoyable As the first... And After the Ending I Cant wait for No.3.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

EricJul 7, 2006

The first 2/3 of the movie was just full of exposition. the last act is what saved the flick from total disaster.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

MattA.Jul 7, 2006

Honestly... it wasn't as bad as the critics are making it out to be. It was thoroughly entertaining throughout, although it was a bit too long.... overall it was good... I was never blown away by the first so, so i felt that this one Honestly... it wasn't as bad as the critics are making it out to be. It was thoroughly entertaining throughout, although it was a bit too long.... overall it was good... I was never blown away by the first so, so i felt that this one lived up to the last one.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

CherryJul 7, 2006

the characters were cool...but they spent 2 much time making the characters cool..that they forgot the plot!! i think the first one was better..the second one was pretty good but could of been better!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

NickiJul 7, 2006

it was very confussing...hard 2 follow along.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

LukeM.Jul 7, 2006

Reading the reviews of POTC:DMC left me weary as I left for the theater. Aside from Apocalypto and The Fountain, this was the first film of the year I had been looking forward too. I am happy to say it does not disappoint. POTC:DMC is full Reading the reviews of POTC:DMC left me weary as I left for the theater. Aside from Apocalypto and The Fountain, this was the first film of the year I had been looking forward too. I am happy to say it does not disappoint. POTC:DMC is full of the humor that made the first film so appealing, doubles the action, and delivers better performances all around. One of the main complaints is concerned with the films running time. Yes, Pirates runs two and a half hours, but after watching it, I was hungry for more. This is one of those films that should not be judged on it's intellect, but on it's ability to deliver entertainment.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

[Anonymous]Jul 7, 2006

Too long, and with no plot to speak of. It wasn't even laughably bad.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

8

PujaN.Jul 7, 2006

I don't know why people are going all crazy trying to judge and ridicule an a mere action flick. It keeps your eyes relatively pleased, yet storyline is somewhat predictable..but who can't fall in love with Johnny Dep's silly I don't know why people are going all crazy trying to judge and ridicule an a mere action flick. It keeps your eyes relatively pleased, yet storyline is somewhat predictable..but who can't fall in love with Johnny Dep's silly character?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

AaronE.Jul 7, 2006

Too long, not funny, no plot, and it makes no sense unless you've seen the first one.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

AshleyJul 7, 2006

If I could give this movie any rating (not just 1-10) it would still be off the charts. I went to the midnight premiere and it was a blast. You don't get that kind of energy in a room unless it's at a midnight show. It was a crazy If I could give this movie any rating (not just 1-10) it would still be off the charts. I went to the midnight premiere and it was a blast. You don't get that kind of energy in a room unless it's at a midnight show. It was a crazy theater full of people who are just in love with Pirates: amazing. People wildly cheered the new grand entrance of Captain Jack Sparrow, weren't afraid to let loose laughing, and just totally enjoyed the ride from stop to finish. I'll admit the beginning was a bit disorientating, and I found myself longing for a clear day on the horizon instead of being below decks for the entire film. It was only in the first 20 minutes when I actually doubted the plotline of the film. Imagine that: doubting two of the greatest writers in Hollywood, not to mention some of the best actors. Now there's a laugh. But as soon as Depp appeared, everyone was in high spirits. The stunts and swordfights were all amazing, as they should be. This sequel includes a host of new characters, most notably a wacky fortune-teller, a colonial lord intent on "justice", and old Bootstrap Turner. We find one character from the previous film in Tortuga, definitely worse for wear, and his character's personality has undergone a complete development stage. It makes for one very interesting clash onscreen, let me tell you. And the Kraken.... oh man, if there's ever been a granddaddy of sea monsters, this is it. That monstrosity rips ships apart in nigh ten seconds. We can truly see why they say Davy Jones rules the seas with a beast like that at his command. Jack Sparrow actually stays a good man to the end (with some assistance from Elizabeth of course), and the twist at the end is enough to rock you until Memorial Day weekend 2007. With all these twists and turns, that means you have to keep up with the story as you're going through all of the different plots. It's one helluva ride though, and better than the first. Cheers. And remember: Hide the rum!!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

DrSnugglesJul 7, 2006

It took a while to get going and could have done with some editing but I thought this was smashing fun and the Kraken was wicked. Cars and SR haven't come out in the UK yet but this is the best blockbuster so far this Summer (although It took a while to get going and could have done with some editing but I thought this was smashing fun and the Kraken was wicked. Cars and SR haven't come out in the UK yet but this is the best blockbuster so far this Summer (although admittedly that is not saying much)… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

TonydannieJul 7, 2006

[***SPOILERS***] Oh Jack Sparrow. You have come back once again to grace the screen with all your rum loving attitude. But why oh why did you have to go to that island where the natives think you are a god? The film starts out like any [***SPOILERS***] Oh Jack Sparrow. You have come back once again to grace the screen with all your rum loving attitude. But why oh why did you have to go to that island where the natives think you are a god? The film starts out like any sequel does. You get re-united(not re-introduced) With the characters from the previous swashbuckling adventure and alot of this and alot of that happens and the movie continues to(you only hope)move forward. Aside from seeng Depp as the rum loving pirate The first quarter of the movie tries desperately to be funny.That's whats hurting it at this point. The natives in this island think that Sparrow is a god but they have to cook him and eat him to release him from his human shell. Well That sounds fine and good but it just draggs for quite a bit too long. overfilled with jokes making it a bit too (here i go using this word that many pepole have thrown around a little too much this past week with another summer blockbuster release) CAMPY! It is to this point where we see Jack Sparrow not as the greatest Pirate that ever lived..but the most idiotic! Lucky for us Our heroes leave this Island and it's natives behind and we get our good ol' pal Jack just as we remember him. Cunning, Mischievious, and yes..Drunk. Aside from the Island sequence. I was affraid I was going to hate this movie. But as soon as discussions of Davey Jones kick in and the Dead Man's chest is out and about. The movie picks up with the same energy that made the original so much fun to watch. Lots Of Special Effects filled action and Davey JOnes Alone is worth a look. which he is played by none other the Bill "VIKTOR" Nighy. The man is one of the greats in my book. and There is this amazing scene with a sea monster that swallows boats whole. I know what it is called i just don't want to spell it right now. So if you are looking for a good time. I say yes..go see. Pirates 2. But remember it will take a bit of time for the movie to get there. And you are going to love the Ending. Like The Lord of the rings, Back to the future and yes, even the matrix. This ending is going to make you say "WHAT?" Have fun!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

NickJul 7, 2006

Just came back from seeing it, and I enjoyed this a lot more than the first one. :)

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

TannerR.Jul 6, 2006

Bloody brilliant. I am going to see it for a third time tonight!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

BrockL.Jul 6, 2006

It was endlessly entertaining,more entertaining and fun than anything all year.Not even the Man of Steel could pull this off. With all the cast returning and more,this is a joy ride that you have to pay twice to fully experience it and feel It was endlessly entertaining,more entertaining and fun than anything all year.Not even the Man of Steel could pull this off. With all the cast returning and more,this is a joy ride that you have to pay twice to fully experience it and feel it.I was astounded and rocked.This film was awesome. The film begins after seeing Jack Sparow settling down with his ship and crew,while Elizabeth and Will Turner have settled down as well.But things of course can't be well for a damn Pirate,when a squid like pirate Davvy Jones reminds Jack that he has a debt to pay.So,of course ,the dishonestly honest Jack must seek help from Elizabeth and Will Turner and there we go again.Another wild ride that will simply leave you speechless. There's everything here for everyone.The thing that Superman Slightly lacked.Colorful ,fun Characters,smart dialogues,great epic-sized action.And of course,some really ,really awe-inspiring CGI effects. There are twists and surprising turns,especially towards the end ,where the fun gets even better ,scene after scene.Something great is always popping up. A far superior sequel than its already splendid first installment,we all loved the first one.And it concludes with a cliffhanger to leave you thirsty for the third.It's the kind of cliffhanger that Reloaded gave us,but its final installment didn't live up to expectations.But I can say this much that ,this films finale,or final installment will rock the world. The Production designs,the sets were unbelievable!They were breath taking.They were so elaborate and detailed that they meet the standards of LORD OF THE RINGS films.It gives the film an other-worldly look.As if the characters were in some kind of a fantasy world. Thank someone,that we have a versatile actor like Johnny Depp.The only actor who I would thank.Having his presence throughout the film was like having a magician constantly pulling out tricks that are all satisfying.Depp,is the first and best reason to watch this film,just like the first one.Knightley is a surprise here.The first one didn't develop her character much,but here she elevates and pushes the boundaries.She really has a lot to do here.Bloom was just like he was in the first one.But his character discovers something that will leave the audience surprised.That is his father.What a surprise it was to finally see the legendary Bootstrap Bill,and Sarsgard was perfection.And then there is the always fabulous Billy Nighy.Where the first one had Geoffrey Rush,here we have Nighy to give you a great baddie.Who never had disappointed me with his performance.So goes for the rest of the cast with a few new additions,such as Naomi Harris. Kudos,to Director Gore Verbinski,and Producer Bruckheimer and Ted Elliot& Terry Rosio for their smart,witty writing.They all give you the very definition of "sequels better than the original".They give you a grand spectacle.They really give you everything you deserve to get from a summer Blockbuster.It's a film that we deserve after numerous Blockbusters that didn't fully satisfied us.This film boosts a better score than the first one too. This one is purely fantasy.The Squid looking Pirates are hardly believable,I mean did they ever existed in really world?Whereas the first one had a more believable Bad Pirates.In this film,the Pirates are more Fantasy-like.And somehow detaches itself from reality.It doesn't occur to you that this might've happened.I mean Pirates that look like squids can hardly be bought.It features a lot more weird creatures,that are actually pirates and more.Giant sea monsters and creatures that are very well created with CGI.And that's one of the few big flaws this film has.It doesn't make itself realistic,nor does it take itself too seriously.When there's something dramatic and serious is suppose to happen.And yes,it's a lot more darker than the first one. Way dark.Don't bring those kids of yours,or they'll hate pirates and their misadventures. Yet,this is a splendid entertainer.It's funny,exciting,fast-paced even with 2 hours plus length.It's simply great.This film features more than you could ask for.Those 2 and a half hours in the dark will keep you thrilled throughout.This year's greatest entertainment is here and will knock you flat.I've seen many Blockbusters, from V for Vendetta,to MI3,Da Vinci to X3 to Superman returns.But none could achieve the satisfaction as this Pirates sequel did.So,it's not all that risky to trust the bloody Pirates after all.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

PaulK.Jul 6, 2006

Takes a while to get up to speed, but the last hour is a fun filled action packed adventure. The special effects encompassing Davy Jones and crew were fantastic. If you're a fan, definitely check this one out in the theater.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

StelP.Jul 6, 2006

I wanted to love this sequel SO BADLY, but unfortunately, it's a ponderous 2-1/2 hours that left me feeling flat and uninspired at the end. Weak screenplay, inconsistent cinematography, very little emotional attachment to any of the I wanted to love this sequel SO BADLY, but unfortunately, it's a ponderous 2-1/2 hours that left me feeling flat and uninspired at the end. Weak screenplay, inconsistent cinematography, very little emotional attachment to any of the main characters, and most importantly, not enough of the witty and sly side of Jack Sparrow. Did I mention that it's WAY too long?! After seeing the first one multiple times in theaters, I was waiting eagerly for that one on DVD. I have no such desire this time around, I'm sorry to say. Once was enough.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

MichaelP.Jul 6, 2006

I LOVED THIS MOVIE! Better than the first in most way, I cannot wait for the final installment!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest

User Reviews