Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest

8

RichardR.Jul 22, 2006

It made me laugh, jump and it was all I expected it to be, a great action comedy. Anyone who expects anything more from the plot or Orlando Bloom's acting will be disappointed. Im afraid. In short, watch it!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

E.KooijJul 21, 2006

Astoundedly awful and mindlessly boring rehash of part 1. I felt being treated like a toddler, endlessly repeating jokes and plot twists which on first occurance might have put a smile on your face (if that).

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

MaryJul 21, 2006

Fantastic movie. Depp is a brilliant. It wasn't long enough!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

DonnaD.Jul 21, 2006

This movie has everything in it, campy humor, witty humor, action, drama, romance, great special effects and of course, Capt. Jack. I've seen it once and plan to see it again, just too much fun!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JoanieS.Jul 21, 2006

Its a perfect sequel. Johnny is still right on! I've already seen it 7 times, plan on seeing it more.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

MaryG.Jul 21, 2006

A fun and hilarious romp, perfect summer entertainment for the whole family. Can't wait for the grand finale next summer! Depp, Knightley, Nighy, Harris - all gave engaging performances. The only problems with it: not enough Capt. Jack A fun and hilarious romp, perfect summer entertainment for the whole family. Can't wait for the grand finale next summer! Depp, Knightley, Nighy, Harris - all gave engaging performances. The only problems with it: not enough Capt. Jack and too much Will.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

KathyP.Jul 21, 2006

Perfect summer escapism. Depp is right on target!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

ClydeM>Jul 21, 2006

It was awesome. Although it didnt have the spark the first one did it hall allot of other things to make up for it!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

C.HenryJul 21, 2006

Ran too long, some of the lines are really lousy, and characters act pretty inconsistently. The fact that pretty much every character from the previous film returns is kind of lame. Nice to look at. Also, i like Bill Nighy. He's cool as Ran too long, some of the lines are really lousy, and characters act pretty inconsistently. The fact that pretty much every character from the previous film returns is kind of lame. Nice to look at. Also, i like Bill Nighy. He's cool as Davy Jones; not even all that make up can hide that it's hime.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

D.J.M.Jul 21, 2006

Not as good as the first one, and a little hard to understand. Other than that it was an all around good movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

AllenT.Jul 20, 2006

Was this movie supposed to be funny? The shishkabob gag, the dog, Keira fake-fainting. Was any of this supposed to bring a smile to my face? Because if so, this is the worst failure in cineplexes this year. It's a total, humorless dud.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

KevinK.Jul 20, 2006

Some people seem to really hate this movie, but I don't see what all the hubub is about. It's supposed to be a summer blockbuster, not an arthouse treatise on the pirate-loot dynamics of the final years of sea exploration (which Some people seem to really hate this movie, but I don't see what all the hubub is about. It's supposed to be a summer blockbuster, not an arthouse treatise on the pirate-loot dynamics of the final years of sea exploration (which probably wouldn't have been a very different movie, anyway). No one will be winning any awards for dramatic acting, but everyone makes their roles entertaining, despite having to watch them play their simple archetypes (Bloom is good guy pirate, Depp is dashing rogue pirate, Knightley is damsel not-so-much-in-distress, etc.) for more than two hours. The start is sloooooow, but once the action starts its a fun ride until the end. It shouldn't be expected to be or considered anything more than an attempt to make a fun movie. See it if you want a fun little puff piece to fill an afternoon, not because you want to see Citizen Cane with pirates.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

JakobK.Jul 20, 2006

I didn't expect too much of this movie, seeing as how I wasn't particularly impressed by the first one, but it turned out to be a lot better than I thought. The action scenes are exciting, intelligent, and funny, the characters are I didn't expect too much of this movie, seeing as how I wasn't particularly impressed by the first one, but it turned out to be a lot better than I thought. The action scenes are exciting, intelligent, and funny, the characters are well-written as well as well-acted, and the film is visually very impressive. Some of the story is a bit confusing… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

SteveE.Jul 20, 2006

Just a long commerical for the next movie (of course there will be one)

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

JimJul 20, 2006

"Surely, the public will think a sequel is just as good. All we have to do is make it look similar and fill it's extra long running time with pointless special effect battles! It worked for the Matrix films...right?" Seriously, I "Surely, the public will think a sequel is just as good. All we have to do is make it look similar and fill it's extra long running time with pointless special effect battles! It worked for the Matrix films...right?" Seriously, I don't think they had a clue what made the first film a hit. Even Johnny Depp is merely a weak charicature of himself from the first film. Like Matrix Reloaded, if there's no real substance behind the action, I don't give a damn about the action itself. If it's 5 minutes of action or 2.5 hours, the fact is I've seen computer effects before! It's just not thrilling watching action for actions sake, action is only thrilling if it has a purpose (ie, like in the first film). What in the world happened to all that other stuff that PotC got so right? A plot? Humor that isn't predictable and forced? Caring about the characters? You need the audience to want a certain outcome! All we're left with is a wait for the ending (and what a loooonng wait it is), which only blatantly reveals the justification for turning this into a trilogy: if you have a hit, milk it!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

KarnaC.Jul 19, 2006

Stinky! There is good, there is average, and there is Pirates of the Carribbean, which is to say, it's utterly bad. It isn't bad as much as awful. Off the chart suckage. I was bored to tears!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

larryK.Jul 19, 2006

Loved the first Pirates. What a wonderfully original and entertaining movie it was and how enjoyable Johnny Depp was in that film. Therefore, it deeply saddens me to say that the sequel was nothing but a bunch of boring nonsense! And most Loved the first Pirates. What a wonderfully original and entertaining movie it was and how enjoyable Johnny Depp was in that film. Therefore, it deeply saddens me to say that the sequel was nothing but a bunch of boring nonsense! And most unfortunately, Johnny Depp wasn't able to recreate the magic that made Captain Jack Sparrow so lovable. I couldn't figure out if Cap'n Jack was supposed to be drugged, drunk, or gay. Depp apparently couldn't decide how to define Sparrow. But then I realized that he was just desperately trying to recapture the brilliance of his first performace… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

MikeJ.Jul 19, 2006

Fantastic Ride! I enjoyed every minute of this film. I can't wait for the next film to find out what happens next.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

ConstanceW.Jul 19, 2006

Please. No More Pirates! I mean that in every sense. No more pirates at McDonald's, on billboards, at the mall, on tv, on the radio, and most immportantly, at the movie theatre! My goodness, could I possibly dislike a movie any more Please. No More Pirates! I mean that in every sense. No more pirates at McDonald's, on billboards, at the mall, on tv, on the radio, and most immportantly, at the movie theatre! My goodness, could I possibly dislike a movie any more than this Pirates sequal? The computer effects were ugly. The acting corny. The plot senseless. Why must we be subjected to another one of these abominations next summer? Someone make the madness stop!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

DwayneS.Jul 19, 2006

POC DMC never lets up. But listen up, folks. This is not a good thing. Too much of everything and just about all of it bad. I'd recomend against it. Unless you like punishment. Waste of my time!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

RuthD.Jul 18, 2006

One of the worst movies I've seen. Most of conversation so mumbled it was incomprehensible, and ditto the action!!!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

MarkB.Jul 18, 2006

Remember the 1970s, when most movie sequels, like Jaws 2, Walking Tall and the Dirty Harry followup Magnum Force, were faint echoes of the originals, usually made by clock-punchers with nowhere near the skill or imagination of the original Remember the 1970s, when most movie sequels, like Jaws 2, Walking Tall and the Dirty Harry followup Magnum Force, were faint echoes of the originals, usually made by clock-punchers with nowhere near the skill or imagination of the original directors? Nowadays, movie sequels couldn't be any farther removed; they're part of franchises now, and so they crank up the budget and production values to give the audience more of the same, only much more, in large part because stock values and jobs are so heavily dependent on their success at topping the originals. The fact that Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest scored a now-legendary record-smashing debut weekend definitely promises more of the same in summers to come: Jerry Bruckheimer and Gore Verbinski have certainly ratcheted up the action set pieces (the three-man water-wheel duel IS a standout), and the CGI denizens of the deep, including the vengeful gigantic squid and Davy Jones' fishy navy are effectively detailed, gooey and gross enough to turn many of us seafood lovers into strict followers of Hebrew dietary laws. However, two elements that have conversely (and curiously) been reduced from the original are the plot, which in POTC1 managed to be refreshingly challenging and complex especially for a summer popcorn movie, and here is merely an excuse to jump from one big special effects sequence to another, and, ironically, the presence of Jack Sparrow himself (excuse me, CAPTAIN Jack Sparrow). This is peculiar because Johnny Depp's interpretation of the character (NOT the action, effects, or ANY of the costars, as a cursory look at the box office of Keira Knightley's or Orlando Bloom's other films will readily reveal) is what MADE the original THE definitive summer flick of 2003: Depp's work was so simultaneously bizarre, original and yet totally accessible that millions of moviegoers simultaneously claimed it as their own original discovery. Part of Depp's genius was that the made Sparrow both the comic relief AND the hero; he appeared to be a foppish, clueless buffoon, but he was in control at every turn. Here, Sparrow seems too often to be merely peripheral to the action, and his intelligence is noticeably diminished; watching such bits as this installment's cannibal sequence, I found myself being reminded too often of Wile E. Coyote. I enjoyed POTC2 enough on a big, dumb special effects movie level (and truly appreciated that they brought back my favorite supporting character from the original, the genuinely classy Disposable Fiance Norrington, even if I wasn't entirely thrilled by what they have his character do here) that these reservations are more observations than actual criticisms...but there's no real excuse to have the ending turn into the most shameless, blatant plug for Numero THree-O since Back to the Future 2 back in 1989. Shouldn't moviegoers with even more mixed responses to POTC2 than I had, and therefore DON'T plan to partake of POTC3 be entitled to get at least 20% of their money back?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

BarryH.M.Jul 18, 2006

I may have liked it better had I been able to stay until the end, but it became too tedious to watch. I walked out of a film for only the second time in my life -- the first was "Blue Hawaii!" When Johnny Depp was onscreen it was fun; I may have liked it better had I been able to stay until the end, but it became too tedious to watch. I walked out of a film for only the second time in my life -- the first was "Blue Hawaii!" When Johnny Depp was onscreen it was fun; otherwise it was boring, if one can say that of disgusting violence and the promise of cannabilism. Maybe they should have stopped with the first installment.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

TomH.Jul 18, 2006

I don't know why I even bother to read the critics' opinions! No, it wasn't as good as the original, but it was still just plain great fun. Sometimes that's all we want from--or demand of--our movies. So sit back, relax, I don't know why I even bother to read the critics' opinions! No, it wasn't as good as the original, but it was still just plain great fun. Sometimes that's all we want from--or demand of--our movies. So sit back, relax, and just enjoy the ride. Apparently the so-called professional reviewers aren't able to do that anymore!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

BenS.Jul 18, 2006

Don't get me wrong, Curse of the Black Pearl is one of my favorite movies, but this sequel was abysmal. First of all, the movie was all over the place. They kept jumping between plot lines, and in one case (can't specify without Don't get me wrong, Curse of the Black Pearl is one of my favorite movies, but this sequel was abysmal. First of all, the movie was all over the place. They kept jumping between plot lines, and in one case (can't specify without spoilers) they seem to totally forget a plot element. The movie did not feel like the first. It's true it had the same characters and setting as the first film, but you need more than that for a good sequel. I was expecting more of a good thing, and I came out terribly disappointed. Disney has a chance to redeem themselves with the third movie, here's hoping they don't screw that one up too.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

GrifterW.Jul 18, 2006

Truly a high seas adventure with plenty of great twists and turns in the plot, great comedic devices and a great set of actors I truly enjoyed Dead Man's Chest and I am surprised that many critics did not. Johnny Depp has created his on Truly a high seas adventure with plenty of great twists and turns in the plot, great comedic devices and a great set of actors I truly enjoyed Dead Man's Chest and I am surprised that many critics did not. Johnny Depp has created his on persona as Jack Sparrow whose crude, slurred remarks and facial expressions alone try to stand to make him the center point of the movie which is how this edition should be. But as comedic as he is, Orlando Bloom and Kiera Knightly actually compete in his misadventurous comedy in this one as opposed to the first one. Decorated with the numerous side actors of the film I enjoyed watching it, and during most of the scenes I was laughing so hard I was almost on the floor. The comedy may seem to be 'Over the top' to most, but in my opinion I think that's how they designed Jack Sparrow to be. The villians are excellently designed, especially Davey Jones whose octopus face is excellent and creepy at the same time. I saw from other reviews I wasn't the only one to note that his eyes stood out from the character in fact making a character of themselves! The plot seems to be a bit rushed when introducing Elizabeth and Will in the beginning, but if they spent twenty minutes explaining what was happening before the rain started to fall it would have probably tipped the tide of the movie opinions. Truly their sense of timing was excellent and by the ratings of 250M$ in a full week it must be saying they've done something right!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

WAKOJAKOJul 17, 2006

I saw it twice last weekend. Need I say more? Johnny Depp rocks!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

ReelWorldJul 17, 2006

A step in the wrong direction from what was an entertaining first film. Even Johnny Depp's talents can't save this overlong, poorly written film from the fathoms of the deep. 2 points for Depp, 1 point for SFX. I don't think A step in the wrong direction from what was an entertaining first film. Even Johnny Depp's talents can't save this overlong, poorly written film from the fathoms of the deep. 2 points for Depp, 1 point for SFX. I don't think I'll be bothering with part 3.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

ChrisR.Jul 17, 2006

Kevin B. nails it on the head. This isn't meant to be a cerebral undertaking, and is generally entertaining and satisfying as a wonderful excuse to enjoy 2-1/2 hours of air-conditioned summer escapism (3 hours if you count the Kevin B. nails it on the head. This isn't meant to be a cerebral undertaking, and is generally entertaining and satisfying as a wonderful excuse to enjoy 2-1/2 hours of air-conditioned summer escapism (3 hours if you count the never-ending trailers). As the inevitable middle-child, however, it casts anything succinct to the wind, and lets loose all manner of multiple artifact-grabbing, sub-plot weaving chaos, to the point where it feels more like a video game than a movie. I felt the need to hit pause more than once to check where I was, what artifacts were in the inventory, and where next to set a course. Jack's compass, all allegory aside, is the true barometer of this film, spinning wildy in search of the next destination, ultimately settling on the obvious third installment, as if anybody didn't know, main characters included...… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

MohammedR.Jul 17, 2006

This movie kicks butt. The critics as usual do not know what they are talking about. Go and see it. Can not wait for part three.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

KevinB.Jul 17, 2006

Enjoyable? Yes. As good as the first? Not quite. While I truly enjoyed seeing this movie with my family, I was a little let down in the presentaion of the characters. It felt to me that everyone was trying too hard to remember what it was Enjoyable? Yes. As good as the first? Not quite. While I truly enjoyed seeing this movie with my family, I was a little let down in the presentaion of the characters. It felt to me that everyone was trying too hard to remember what it was that made his/her character so likable in the first film. The one exception was that of Norrington. If you watch the dvd audio commentary with the cast, Jack Davenport (Norrington) exclaims that he looks like an "ice cream cone" compared to everyone else. Well, he got his chance to dirty it up a little, get your minds out of the gutter, I'm referring to his costuming. He did a splendid job portraying his role as a destitue, decomissioned officer of the British royal navy. I must say I am excited for the third installment because of the reappearance of Barbossa. Geoffrey Rush will not disappoint in his reprise. Yes, many of the jokes were rehashed. Yes, it was long. I hardly noticed the time pass until I left the theater and checked the time. My favorite link to the first film was when we finally get to see what tribe Sparrow was made chief of. Go and enjoy yourselves. You shouldn't be disapointed.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

CateW.Jul 17, 2006

Definitely an e-ticket ride, though darker than the first episode. Arrr!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

BeckerR.Jul 17, 2006

Lost most of the potent wit of the first film and Bloom and Knightly were totally less likable. More of a formulaic film with a hyper awarness of itself compared to the innocence of the first.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

BrianK.Jul 17, 2006

John T. to answer your question, Jack the Monkey was seen stealing a gold coin and re-turning Undead after the credits rolled in the first movie... Okay, Hard to say that this was an action movie, inaction was more like it, and the fact this John T. to answer your question, Jack the Monkey was seen stealing a gold coin and re-turning Undead after the credits rolled in the first movie... Okay, Hard to say that this was an action movie, inaction was more like it, and the fact this movie dragged so much is what hurt it the most I think. What made the first so great was it was dumb, fast, funny, shiny good fun the sequel was shiny but just dumb, I can't say I outright disliked this movie, I enjoyed moments, the story at times was good and the FX were Special. But I was yawning quite a bit during the Movie... lets hope the third installment is quite a bit better (I digged the surprise cliff hanger) ...despite So-So reviews this is the top grossing movie of all time it looks like, so Bruckheimer and Gore have nothing to be ashamed about, and Johnny Depp is now the biggest draw in the Universe.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

LaurieV.Jul 17, 2006

A bunch of good set pieces adrift in a sea of mediocre movie. Maybe if you cut an hour this would be an exciting film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

BrotherKurtJul 16, 2006

[***spoilers alert***] Pirates was pretty horrible. If they had cut about 45-60 minutes out of that snooze feast, I would have been okay with it. But it was nothing but one special effects set piece after another, some of which were simply[***spoilers alert***] Pirates was pretty horrible. If they had cut about 45-60 minutes out of that snooze feast, I would have been okay with it. But it was nothing but one special effects set piece after another, some of which were simply repeated to lesser effect later in the film (eg. Bone Cage - funny; Big Wheel - redundant). And some of the effects, such as Bill Nighy's tentacle face, just overwhelmed an otherwise good actor. All in all, a major disappointment; nonetheless, they did hook me at the end so I will probably see the third one. Grrrr....… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

BrettJul 16, 2006

I didn't the first one. I thought the movie was over the top ridiculous, but entertaining nonetheless. If the ending is not going to be an ending, the audience should be aware of this before the movie begins. As in LOTR and Star Wars.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

TylerW.Jul 16, 2006

I've heard everything on the spectrum for this movie, from too dark and different from the first, to the same old crap. I watched this movie opening night with the expectation of it holding the bar set by the first one. Coming out of I've heard everything on the spectrum for this movie, from too dark and different from the first, to the same old crap. I watched this movie opening night with the expectation of it holding the bar set by the first one. Coming out of the theatre I realised I'd experienced a much different movie from the first, a much darker and more character driven movie. Oddly enough I also find myself disagreeing with those who think this movie is funnier. I enjoyed this movie, and hold it up to par with the first: a moodier atmosphere, deeper characters, and a step away from typical romanticism and cheesy lines, all of which play to my preferences. Worth seeing if you have an open mind, dont expect every inch of novelty the first one had (it is the same series after all), and are willing to give the characters some room to grow. Final thoughts: Yes it is noticably long & Davy Jones' is incredible: flawless animation and excellent acting seemlessly combined.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

KarenS.Jul 16, 2006

"Take what you can. Give nothing back." This sequel is the worst kind of movie making. To betray your audience's anticipation of a second entertaining and well-crafted movie by giving them one with no plot, no character development, and "Take what you can. Give nothing back." This sequel is the worst kind of movie making. To betray your audience's anticipation of a second entertaining and well-crafted movie by giving them one with no plot, no character development, and the witless rehash of previous jokes, simply to make a buck, is itself an act of piracy. Disney isn't going to profit on my dollar again unless I benefit from the exchange, too. When they make another Pirates movie that is smart, funny, and well-written, I'll go see it. Until then, I'm sticking with Pixar.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

IanJul 16, 2006

Was a good film all in all. But the ending was rather reminiscent of the lord of the rings, when the fellowship is created, but worth a watch if you want to see pirates, ghouls & cannibals all in one film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

DarrenF.Jul 15, 2006

Hey everybody, how about this movie WAS good. You all just expect it to be like The Curse of the Black Pearl. I don't want to sit through the same crap (albeit, excellent crap) AGAIN. I want something different. There's nothing Hey everybody, how about this movie WAS good. You all just expect it to be like The Curse of the Black Pearl. I don't want to sit through the same crap (albeit, excellent crap) AGAIN. I want something different. There's nothing wrong with a dark atmosphere, which was not even that dark. There were still plenty of funny, funny scenes. The problem most of you seem to have is the plot. It was fine; if you don't overanalyze like so many people (critics included) seem to do, then it makes sense. And the cliffhanger ending? COME ON, PEOPLE. So many trilogies have ended part 2 like that. LOTR of recent years. STAR WARS: EMPIRE!? COME ON! To be quite honest, I thought it was an excellent movie. People expect so much out of everything now. You all expected these outlandish ideas of what it should be, and are just upset that things could not turn out the way you dreamed. It was a very good, well-made movie. I will agree the first one was better. However, Dead Man's Chest is an excellent movie, as well. First week numbers don't lie, people. Everyone in the theater when I watched loved it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JohnT.Jul 15, 2006

Docked a few points for a unnecessarily convoluted plot this nonethless delivers the goods. More sinister and darker than the first one but that helps the characterization too. All in all a rollicking good time in the way of the Indian Jones Docked a few points for a unnecessarily convoluted plot this nonethless delivers the goods. More sinister and darker than the first one but that helps the characterization too. All in all a rollicking good time in the way of the Indian Jones or The Mummy films. I wasn't aware that I would have to wait a year for all of the plot resolutions so be warned going in. I can't wait for the conclusion though. One question: if the rest of the crew of the Black Pearl is no longer cursed why is the Monkey still undead?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

KravenJul 15, 2006

They should have stopped at the first film. If 3 is anywhere near as boring as 2 then the whole ship is sunk!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

ClintM.Jul 15, 2006

Absolutely loved this one! the special f/x were incredible, Johnny Depp proves again that he earned that Oscar nomination for Sparrow, and the action is great!! Go see it!!!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

KristenJ.Jul 15, 2006

I LOVED the first Pirates movie. I had posters of Capt. Jack and Will on my bedroom walls. I couldn't wait for the sequal, I was looking forward to it the whole year. I'm sorry to say i really didn't like this movie, it I LOVED the first Pirates movie. I had posters of Capt. Jack and Will on my bedroom walls. I couldn't wait for the sequal, I was looking forward to it the whole year. I'm sorry to say i really didn't like this movie, it didn't feel like the first. I can't believe I'm saying this, but I actually thought it was really bad. I went home after the movie and took down my posters. Maybe I've grown up. Or maybe the movie really is that bad.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

RickDangerousJul 15, 2006

10 out of 10. This movie beyond delivered. This is the best movie of the summer, if not year. Keira Knightley, Johnny, and Orlando all gave timeless performances in the tradition of Indiana Jones and LOTR. The critics really missed the point 10 out of 10. This movie beyond delivered. This is the best movie of the summer, if not year. Keira Knightley, Johnny, and Orlando all gave timeless performances in the tradition of Indiana Jones and LOTR. The critics really missed the point on this one. Don't listen to em', don't be a critic, and just watch and enjoy the best damn movie out!… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

7

4345Jul 15, 2006

The movie felt long. Given the many plots and subplots going about it is a bit overwhelming to digest all of the information you're given in one sitting. While the action is entertaining and the special effects are very well done, it The movie felt long. Given the many plots and subplots going about it is a bit overwhelming to digest all of the information you're given in one sitting. While the action is entertaining and the special effects are very well done, it also begins to wear a bit thin by movie's end. Quantity over quality pervades much of the movie. Davy Jones was very well done, as were repeat performances from previous characters of the first pirates.. but stitching together all of the old characters felt a bit convoluted at times. Entertaining, worth seeing, a bit long and some nonsense.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

JoshuaJ.Jul 14, 2006

Extremely entertaining! Great special effects, Great family movie. A movie for all ages. Not as corny as the first but still a good movie. If you go in there expecting anything more then a good time, then youre mistaken. Dont go in there Extremely entertaining! Great special effects, Great family movie. A movie for all ages. Not as corny as the first but still a good movie. If you go in there expecting anything more then a good time, then youre mistaken. Dont go in there looking for one of Depps more dramatic performances and dont go in there looking for Depps range as an actor. This movie is the definition of a good time at the movies!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

Sinn7Jul 14, 2006

This is the best movie I have seen in 3 years (when the 1st one came out). It was so funny that at one stage I found myself clapping as I laughed! It was also more exciting than the 1st movie as I was literally on the edge of my seat for the This is the best movie I have seen in 3 years (when the 1st one came out). It was so funny that at one stage I found myself clapping as I laughed! It was also more exciting than the 1st movie as I was literally on the edge of my seat for the last fifteen minutes.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

GeorgeS.Jul 14, 2006

Gone is the fun, the not-taking yourself too seriously, the amazing sword play (with the excpetion of the 'rolling fight' - don't want to spoil the scene for those that haven't seen it), the loveable Captain Jack with the Gone is the fun, the not-taking yourself too seriously, the amazing sword play (with the excpetion of the 'rolling fight' - don't want to spoil the scene for those that haven't seen it), the loveable Captain Jack with the quick witt and supporting cast that ate it up. Enter stunning visual effects, a much darker atmosphere, boring dialogue, a cast that is going through the motions, and a script that is too long and doesn't stand on its own as a movie, but a set up for the sequel. I'd wait till the DVD or go to a matinee.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

ChrisA.Jul 14, 2006

I can't believe everyone complaining about the cliffhanger ending. "Fellowship of the Ring" ended the same way, but everyone thinks that's the best movie ever. "Dead Man's Chest" was a great fun movie that gets you pumped for I can't believe everyone complaining about the cliffhanger ending. "Fellowship of the Ring" ended the same way, but everyone thinks that's the best movie ever. "Dead Man's Chest" was a great fun movie that gets you pumped for the final film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

BobF.Jul 14, 2006

An entertaining flick, but the end is very unsatisfying--like an empty chocolate truffle. It was obviously designed that way so that the story is completed with the next installment. I am very surprised that other reviews did not mention this.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

DeezerD.Jul 14, 2006

I'm really not sure how people are -that- confused about this plot. Sure, it's a little sloppy, but come on people.... this isn't very difficult to understand. In fact, it's not even that important to understand every I'm really not sure how people are -that- confused about this plot. Sure, it's a little sloppy, but come on people.... this isn't very difficult to understand. In fact, it's not even that important to understand every detail of the story to enjoy the movie. Take this film for what it is -- mindless, meaningless? Sure. Entertaining and fun? Yep.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

G.Jul 14, 2006

life is too precious to waste on this. The movie could have been made by a six year old.. thread bare plot woven around awful CGI sequences awful theatrical acting flat one liners people banging their heads/falling off cliffs as humour

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

SeamusM.Jul 14, 2006

First hour was good. The rest was goddamn-awful. i've never been so bored in a cinema....ok maybe once or twice. Incomprehensible plot which means the action sequences have no meaning. Avoid,avoid like the plague.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

BobR.Jul 13, 2006

Lots of fun.....but the next movie will make or break this one.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

PeterN.Jul 13, 2006

The voodoo lady in the movie talks about "Dee End of Dee Eartd". Well, i felt pushed to dee end of my wits by dis filum. Johnny Depp is one of my favorites on the big screen. He was so good in the first Piraes movie and in Charlie and the The voodoo lady in the movie talks about "Dee End of Dee Eartd". Well, i felt pushed to dee end of my wits by dis filum. Johnny Depp is one of my favorites on the big screen. He was so good in the first Piraes movie and in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. But he, like Orlando and Kiera, were boring this time around. I got a headache about a half hour into the movie, and it didn't feel better until I walked out of the theater. That's what this movie is good for. Giving headaches.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

JohnP.Jul 13, 2006

Sattles viewers to their seats with big budget action yet seemingly fails to satisfy in any way.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

KatssunflowerJul 13, 2006

Its quite simple to enjoy this movie: have a sense of humor, accept the interwoven legend with history, and step into Pirate's world. Stick to the code. Otherwise you will be another frustrated soul whining about length, confusion, and Its quite simple to enjoy this movie: have a sense of humor, accept the interwoven legend with history, and step into Pirate's world. Stick to the code. Otherwise you will be another frustrated soul whining about length, confusion, and boredom....gross.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

GaryS.Jul 13, 2006

Interesting special effects, but we walked out after an hour. Very confusing plot or no plot.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

LuisF.Jul 13, 2006

A great summer movie. Although it lacks originality, this is not a bad thing.There were some action scenes and a bit of comedy for fill-in, but over all, fans of the original movie will be satisfied, as well as newcomers.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

HalB.Jul 13, 2006

Very disappointing overall. Some cool special effects & makeup (Bill Nighy as Davy Jones) and a few humorous/entertaining action sequences, but a very uneven movie -- veering wildly from cruel and gross to silly (the Keystone Kops-type Very disappointing overall. Some cool special effects & makeup (Bill Nighy as Davy Jones) and a few humorous/entertaining action sequences, but a very uneven movie -- veering wildly from cruel and gross to silly (the Keystone Kops-type sequences). Basically just a setup for Act III. Perhaps I was expecting too much, given how thoroughly entertaining the first POTC was. Bill Nighy's performance was the best thing about the film. Depp completely inhabits Capt Jack Sparrow, but his act is wearing thin at this point (in my humble opinion). Maybe I'm missing the point...?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

JPG.Jul 13, 2006

I can't believe this movie beat Spiderman. I only lasted 10 minutes of this movie. It was the worst movie of the summer. I hope the third one is better but I doubt it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

GerronK.Jul 13, 2006

This is a fantastic thrill ride from beginning to end! From the stunning special effects, to the always dependable Johnny Depp's performance, this movie defines the genre of summer blockbuster. I will admit that the movie seems to be This is a fantastic thrill ride from beginning to end! From the stunning special effects, to the always dependable Johnny Depp's performance, this movie defines the genre of summer blockbuster. I will admit that the movie seems to be veering off course several times, but that didn't deter me from having the best time at a theater since last year's "Batman Begins".… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

KieferH>Jul 13, 2006

...not much to say about this one...didn't live up to the expectations of us all i believe...not too shabby though....a little tedious to watch....*asi asi* ( spanish for *so so*)

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

LeighJul 13, 2006

After enduring meandering, tedious subplot after meandering, tedious subplot the film finally reveals the actual plot, just in time to roll the credits. Too many dull distractions serve only to litter and confuse the otherwise stale and After enduring meandering, tedious subplot after meandering, tedious subplot the film finally reveals the actual plot, just in time to roll the credits. Too many dull distractions serve only to litter and confuse the otherwise stale and overused pirate puns and the acting-by-numbers performances. Apparently the cinema manager isn't able to give me back my 2 1/2 hours...be warned.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

7

AndyM.Jul 13, 2006

Aside from the length (30 mins too long) and the hugely derivative ending (that blatantly steals from a multitude of films - Jaws, Star Wars, Star Trek 2, LOTR) there is just enough of the original magic to make it worth viewing. Perhaps it Aside from the length (30 mins too long) and the hugely derivative ending (that blatantly steals from a multitude of films - Jaws, Star Wars, Star Trek 2, LOTR) there is just enough of the original magic to make it worth viewing. Perhaps it has suffered from over-inflated expectation? Judging from some of the comments here, I think so. Regardless, it has some truly excellent effects, and dashes of physical comedy that would have brought a smile to Chaplin's face (the kebab sequence, the rolling wheel?!).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

TravisM.Jul 13, 2006

The original stands alone with some good classic-style swashbuckling sword fighting scenes, whitty humour, and an awesome storyline. This second movie was too long, and mainly tries to cash in on the original movie's success. More The original stands alone with some good classic-style swashbuckling sword fighting scenes, whitty humour, and an awesome storyline. This second movie was too long, and mainly tries to cash in on the original movie's success. More slapstick humour without a decent fight scene unless you're looking for a 'Clash of the Titans' creature which apparently can crush one ship in a matter of 3 seconds but takes 10 minutes to devour The Black Pearl. Anyways if the 3rd movie makes up for all the 2nd's shortcomings then we'll look back at this film as meerly a springboard in the storyline for the last movie; otherwise it'll be another waste of 3 hours (once you add in trailers and if you decide to stay for the unnecessary scene after the credits).… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

1

JohnsonD.Jul 12, 2006

Those who give this movie 9 and 10, do you have any standards? This rank pile of drivel accomplishes nothing! It's merely there, for 2 1/2 hrs. People who haven't seen it, save your money. Truly. This one's a video-rental, if Those who give this movie 9 and 10, do you have any standards? This rank pile of drivel accomplishes nothing! It's merely there, for 2 1/2 hrs. People who haven't seen it, save your money. Truly. This one's a video-rental, if that. Pathetically crappy film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

TanyaJ.Jul 12, 2006

Frankly, while i didnt really expect this movie to surpass the first one, it still appalled me. out of all the sequels ive seen, this has got to be one of the worst. cheap, overused puns, a lame storyline and no originality whatsoever madeFrankly, while i didnt really expect this movie to surpass the first one, it still appalled me. out of all the sequels ive seen, this has got to be one of the worst. cheap, overused puns, a lame storyline and no originality whatsoever made this movie completely unwatchable. this film should come with a "May cause cerebral bleeding!" warning.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

TonyL.Jul 12, 2006

Reasons why this film didn't work for me. 1) I loved Johnny Depp's take on Capt. Sparrow in the first film. Now it is old hat. 2) Kiera K. was a fresh new face in the first film, but she really didn't add anything new to the Reasons why this film didn't work for me. 1) I loved Johnny Depp's take on Capt. Sparrow in the first film. Now it is old hat. 2) Kiera K. was a fresh new face in the first film, but she really didn't add anything new to the role this time. 3) Norrington worked much better as a starchy British officer. 4) Directors must really figure out when to say when there is enough special effects. 5) You really cared about Capt. Barbosa and the rest of the crew in the last film, not so much in this one 6) Can't anybody edit anymore? This type of movie doesn't need to be over 2+30 hours!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

RobertM.Jul 12, 2006

Dead Man's Chest is a thrill-seeking adventure that turns toward a dark heading as the story becomes appropriately more grim. The effects make the action sequences breathtaking while the performances are as suprising as it's ending.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

SangheeC.Jul 12, 2006

It was overall an amusing movie for a Friday afternoon, but it was tedious. The crew of Davey Jones was too ghostly and ghoulish. While the first one was just the right amount of reature-esque, the octapus and crab and conch thing in this It was overall an amusing movie for a Friday afternoon, but it was tedious. The crew of Davey Jones was too ghostly and ghoulish. While the first one was just the right amount of reature-esque, the octapus and crab and conch thing in this movie was way too stupid. The ending ruined it. At least in the first one, there was the option of seeing the second one, but not in this movie. YOu practically HAVE to see the next one. The characters acted very out-of-character all the time. It was a mix between strange people, and the original characters. It was just not as good as the previous one. Though, as always, the music was excellent.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

HooverH.Jul 12, 2006

The rabid fans are wrong: -This is definitely not the best movie of the year -It DEFINITELY was NOT fast paced -Johnny Depp's acting was NOT impressive as it was in the first. He's got a line of charades worked up that he uses The rabid fans are wrong: -This is definitely not the best movie of the year -It DEFINITELY was NOT fast paced -Johnny Depp's acting was NOT impressive as it was in the first. He's got a line of charades worked up that he uses constantly such as bringing his knees freakishly high while running (haha...no), making squeamish faces etc...… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

AnthonyS.Jul 12, 2006

Too long, Fun at times, confusing at others,what,s the deal with the Pirate and the girl? And the ending stinks.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

NancyS.Jul 12, 2006

1) Too long. It felt long, regardless of how I felt about it overall. I didn't think of it at the time but a prior voter here said that the cannibal island sequence could have been cut with no real damage and I think I would have to 1) Too long. It felt long, regardless of how I felt about it overall. I didn't think of it at the time but a prior voter here said that the cannibal island sequence could have been cut with no real damage and I think I would have to agree and some of the other scenes could have been shortened to make the slap-stick effect a bit more punchy. They were probably too attached to the cannibal idea but it was a plot (?) meander that wasn't needed. 2) Not for younger kids, I think, although, who knows, with the cartoons and stuff they watch these days, but a little on the graphic side it seemed to me with some of the Davey Jones bunch. 3) Frankly, if I had known what the general plot was before I went I would have been able to enjoy it a little more instead of trying to figure out the plot and interpret dialogue (and unlike some voters here, I think there was one, or several, plots). 4) I did laugh at some of the dialogue and the visuals were pretty cool - I had no problem with Davey Jones and his crew: was fascinated by the tentacle beard but creeped out by some of the crew. If you want to enjoy the third movie than you need to see the second.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JustinD.Jul 12, 2006

I loved it! Sure, the opening was slow, but the second half more than makes up for it. And as for being "too scary" for little kids, I took my 3 and 5 year old brothers and the only thing that scared them was the "Lady In The Water" trailer. I loved it! Sure, the opening was slow, but the second half more than makes up for it. And as for being "too scary" for little kids, I took my 3 and 5 year old brothers and the only thing that scared them was the "Lady In The Water" trailer. The movie itself was riveting! Best movie I've seen in a while! Can't wait for POTC: At World's End...… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

CraigAaen-S.Jul 12, 2006

Overly complex and 'epic'. WAAYYY too scary for a PG-13. Several families had to leave the cinema I was in after kids were terrified by birds pecking out eyeballs, faceless corpses and all other manner of grotesque images. Made ME Overly complex and 'epic'. WAAYYY too scary for a PG-13. Several families had to leave the cinema I was in after kids were terrified by birds pecking out eyeballs, faceless corpses and all other manner of grotesque images. Made ME feel slightly sick.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

JoeyP.Jul 12, 2006

I have to give it a 0, because it was that craptacular. Considering how great the first one was, it's amazing how terrible the second one was. The sad thing is, that since it's making a lot of money, some producers will think they I have to give it a 0, because it was that craptacular. Considering how great the first one was, it's amazing how terrible the second one was. The sad thing is, that since it's making a lot of money, some producers will think they did something right. What they WON'T REALIZE is, is what they did right in first place was the first one.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

DanF.Jul 12, 2006

[***SPOILER***] I be a pirate, and I think this film be ye accurate representation of the day to day life of ye average deckhand. Therefore, a 9 I give this documentary about the life, and apparent greusome death, of my captain, jack sparrow.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

TomB.Jul 11, 2006

The cast and crew of Dead Man's Chest seem to have no idea what was successful about the first 'Pirates of the Caribbean' - and they are the same people! They just happen upon the 'snowball gathering speed down a The cast and crew of Dead Man's Chest seem to have no idea what was successful about the first 'Pirates of the Caribbean' - and they are the same people! They just happen upon the 'snowball gathering speed down a hill' in the second half of this film, but the pacing of the first hour is just DEATH - and not the fun kind. The material in the first 60 minutes could be covered in 6 - and it still would have been over 90 minutes long. Warning to parents: the PG-13 is firm. The blood and creepiness in this second 'Pirates' outing far exceeds the first and is not appropriate for younger children. Whle Davey Jones' crew are imaginative creatures, their gruesome visages will haunt the young - and are too detailed to read on the big screen (ILM's downfall on more than one film) and will be lost on smaller formats like DVD. What were they thinking?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

PaulR.Jul 11, 2006

Outstanding summer film. I am not sure what the critics have against this film I found it thouroughly fun and entertaining. Great lead up into the next film.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

GriffinMillJul 11, 2006

Every component in Pirates I that earned the picture a rating of 7 - was amplified (exagerated) into vulgarity. Metacritic has been a dependable resource. How is it that in assigning numerical ratings from the critics, in the case of this Every component in Pirates I that earned the picture a rating of 7 - was amplified (exagerated) into vulgarity. Metacritic has been a dependable resource. How is it that in assigning numerical ratings from the critics, in the case of this film, deeply negative reviews are given relatively high numerical ratings. Read the reviewers' comments and ask how: "A long, tedious and convoluted follow-up to 2003's rollicking high-seas hit, The Curse of the Black Pearl, this second installment in the promised trilogy lacks the swash and buckle of the original. And then some." this sounds like the writer was giving the film a 5 out of 10 rating? More like 2 (generous) out of ten. [Ed: We don't score the quotations. We score the entire review.] … Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

DrewF.Jul 11, 2006

A tale of two movies: First half is long, dull and incredibly unfunny. Second half is fun, exciting and incredibly funny. Second half of the movie makes the first half worth sitting thru.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

ReidF.Jul 11, 2006

Pretty bad, I like all the actors but the story line was tacked together and struggeling. The visuals were impressive but too many giant squid scenes. A shorter simplified plot with emphasis on Jack Sparrow would have been much more pleasing.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

TraiDepJul 11, 2006

A *very* fast paced roller coaster ride. packs more popcorn fun in one movie that some trilogies lack (some reviewers said, 'difficult to follow plot' or 'too dense'. I personally think they're too old. :)

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

JaredJul 11, 2006

To sum it up in a sentence: Contained within the movie is a great movie but its buried or more appropriately drowned in subplots, excessive action sequences, terrible pacing, and silly fish pirates.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

10

MichaelJul 11, 2006

I have absolutely no idea where all these naysayers are coming from. Every single person I know who has seen the film, agrees that this movie truly establishes the series as the best original film franchise since Back to the Future and I have absolutely no idea where all these naysayers are coming from. Every single person I know who has seen the film, agrees that this movie truly establishes the series as the best original film franchise since Back to the Future and Indiana Jones. This trilogy will go down in history books, and will be deemed as timeless classics. And Davy Jones is beautiful. He is truly stunning, and is easily the most iconic movie villain since Darth Vader, and the old time classic Disney villains like Maleficent and the Queen from Snow White. The running time absolutely flies by, and there is alot more storyline and inventive action sequences than the first film, which was a rather swift plot dragged into a 2-hour swordfight. It's eye-candy, it's sensationalism, and it perfectly picks you up where it left off and drops you off gasping for breath. Do not listen to these bizzarre people that did not like; there is not a single thing more you could ask for from a popcorn movie; and it's so refreshing to see such a wonderful film that is NOT adapted from silly fantasy novels or overrated comic books! Because when you get right down to it, all the films borrow from the ride is the name itself; plotwise, the films borrow more from the Monkey Island computer games. See it now!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

PurseyH.Jul 11, 2006

I thought it was very entertaining, as you can see by the customer reviews alot of people agree. The point is its a movie that is definitely worth seeing and who knows, if you can put all these bad reviews out of your head and get your own I thought it was very entertaining, as you can see by the customer reviews alot of people agree. The point is its a movie that is definitely worth seeing and who knows, if you can put all these bad reviews out of your head and get your own oppinion on it, mabey you'll really like it. I did.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

SuzanneC.Jul 11, 2006

i can't believe people are saying that this film wasn't as good as the first one. it had more action, more comedy, more twists, more exciting characters and an amazing cliff hanger. the first one was fantastic but this one topped i can't believe people are saying that this film wasn't as good as the first one. it had more action, more comedy, more twists, more exciting characters and an amazing cliff hanger. the first one was fantastic but this one topped it in my book. i saw it the day after it was released and it got amazing cheers when it started and had more when it finished. it was amazing and should be a definite oscar winner for johnny!!!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

FantasyJul 11, 2006

Pirates 2 was a bit long and dragged at some points but still was great fun. The trilogy is no more as by breaking all the records they have changed it into two more flicks. Keith Richards has already signed on to play Captain Jack's Pirates 2 was a bit long and dragged at some points but still was great fun. The trilogy is no more as by breaking all the records they have changed it into two more flicks. Keith Richards has already signed on to play Captain Jack's father which should be a hoot. But for now this Pirates is very long and some of it should have been left on the cutting room floor. But for those of you who hated it, don't take this movie too seriously, because it is nothing more than an amusement ride. Just bring the popcorn, sit back and enjoy. Johnny Depp steals the show.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

HayleyC.Jul 11, 2006

Phillip W.. if you didnt like it.. fine, say what it is you didnt like and leave it at that no need to diss the movie, or those that like(ed) it, it was very much a set up for the last in the trilogy and more script would have been nice. but Phillip W.. if you didnt like it.. fine, say what it is you didnt like and leave it at that no need to diss the movie, or those that like(ed) it, it was very much a set up for the last in the trilogy and more script would have been nice. but it was FUN.. stop expecting this movie to have been all deep and meaningful...it was supposed to be exciting, fun, eye candy.. and it WAS. sheesh enjoy yourself for a change - cant wait for the 3rd.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

JasmineJ.Jul 11, 2006

I can't believe anyone would call this their favorite movie of all time. It was loud, obnoxious and pointless. Best movie of the year? Try most annoying disappointment of the year. Pirates 1 was great. This chapter was on the other I can't believe anyone would call this their favorite movie of all time. It was loud, obnoxious and pointless. Best movie of the year? Try most annoying disappointment of the year. Pirates 1 was great. This chapter was on the other hand, a great bore.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful

9

LorileeO.Jul 10, 2006

I don't know why so many are harping on the 2 1/2 hour run time - this seems to be in line with other blockbusters (Superman Returns, King Kong, Lord of the Rings, Star Wars, Titanic etc.) - I didn't notice all the complaining I don't know why so many are harping on the 2 1/2 hour run time - this seems to be in line with other blockbusters (Superman Returns, King Kong, Lord of the Rings, Star Wars, Titanic etc.) - I didn't notice all the complaining then! The movie provides exactly what viewers want from this sort of story - fascinating venues, high intensity special effects, loads of action, solid humor, romance, and a touch of horror. What more could you want of a action/adveture pirate movie? Johnny Depp is spectacular, as are the witch lady, Kiera and Orlando. The wait to see #3 is going to kill me! No, it didn't have any serious, life changing subplots or morals, but it was not meant to. All the key players stayed true to their character. The effects were amazing. For me, the 2 1/2 hours whizzed by.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

AlL.Jul 10, 2006

Entertaining, but these silly summer blockbusters are getting way too long (yes, I'm looking at you Superman). Seems like editors don't have any kind of pull in Hollywood any more. Director won't cut out the fat, the producer Entertaining, but these silly summer blockbusters are getting way too long (yes, I'm looking at you Superman). Seems like editors don't have any kind of pull in Hollywood any more. Director won't cut out the fat, the producer won't cut anything expensive and as a result these movies are getting bloated, protracted and boring. This one is no exception. Longwinded scenes with pointless uninspiring banter or alternately bulky exposition, punctuated with lengthy action set pieces which, while an undeniably rollicking good time, added nothing to the story whatsoever. Knightley was great, Depp seemed to be gritting his teeth and thinking of the money, and Orlando Bloom was just a pretty-looking mannequin. So why an 8? Because I work in the CG industry and I have never seen better work any other movie ever. Absolutely seamless, and very, very beautiful. The work on Davy Jones's wet, squishy visage was in a class of it's own. I live for the day when work of this calibre turns up in a story that would actually make the effort worthwhile.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

DanaM.Jul 10, 2006

Let's start by saying it was a movie worth seeing. It was worth the 9 bucks to be entertained. The special effects were quite good, and Davey Jones crew was quite a makeup mans nightmare. Certain scenes were difficult to understand but Let's start by saying it was a movie worth seeing. It was worth the 9 bucks to be entertained. The special effects were quite good, and Davey Jones crew was quite a makeup mans nightmare. Certain scenes were difficult to understand but hey the special effects were great. The accents of the actors, especially the Voodoo lady were so think that it was difficult to understand the lines. Did all pirates have English accents back then? Hmmm. Depp was his usual swishey cowardly self, running away from everything possible. Only when he's chained to his sinking ship by Elizabeth does he show some guts. Disappointing character development IMHO. But overall a good movie, worth seeing.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

GrantB.Jul 10, 2006

Confusing/Slow Moving/Orlando Bloom can't act.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JoanJul 10, 2006

How much more bang for your buck could you ask for? In 2+ hours you get some action, some comedy, lots of adventure, and 3 very beautiful people playing pirates. It's not Shakespeare, but it's not Battlefield Earth either.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

PhilipW.Jul 10, 2006

This was a pathetic attempt at Adventure for Adventure's sake. Anyone who likes this film is a vacuous imp. Do us a favor, film-makers, please spare us from the inevitable roasted feces that one should expect in the final installment.

0 of 1 users found this helpful

7

BitBurnJul 10, 2006

It was aiight I guess, although not worth the huge media blitz thrown about it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest

User Reviews