Universal Pictures | Release Date: March 18, 2011
7.0
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 426 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
267
Mixed:
135
Negative:
24
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
6
grandpajoe6191Sep 18, 2011
Although "Paul" isn't strong in script & story as much as "Shaun of the Dead" or "Hot fuzz", the tone is humorous thanks to the friendly Pegg+Frost combo.
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
4
soldoutactivistMar 20, 2011
"Seth Rogen is 'perfect' as Paul," primarily because you don't spend the movie watching the real Seth Rogen attempt acting. That alone garnered an extra point from me. The movie itself was ET meets Star Wars references written by people who"Seth Rogen is 'perfect' as Paul," primarily because you don't spend the movie watching the real Seth Rogen attempt acting. That alone garnered an extra point from me. The movie itself was ET meets Star Wars references written by people who smoked a lot of weed during the writing process. Expand
4 of 6 users found this helpful42
All this user's reviews
5
filmtrashreviewJun 8, 2011
Pegg and Frost lost the physical comedy that made there films so enjoyable and replaced it with foul language laughs that are better left to Will Farrell and Company. Those that love a cheesy comedy will still enjoy this overall piece of purePegg and Frost lost the physical comedy that made there films so enjoyable and replaced it with foul language laughs that are better left to Will Farrell and Company. Those that love a cheesy comedy will still enjoy this overall piece of pure silliness. Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
5
KarthXLRMar 20, 2011
It's a forgettable movie with a few memorable moments. Odds are, if you've seen the trailer, you've seen said everything the movie has to offer. Not bad, just not good either.
4 of 7 users found this helpful43
All this user's reviews
5
BikerjamesMar 28, 2011
There are a few chuckles, but I would have enjoyed the movie more if I was 13 years old. This is the second movie in just a couple of weeks of release of each other that pays homages to other movies throughout (the other being Rango). TheThere are a few chuckles, but I would have enjoyed the movie more if I was 13 years old. This is the second movie in just a couple of weeks of release of each other that pays homages to other movies throughout (the other being Rango). The visual effects overall are well done, I just wish the humor would have been a little more sophisticated, and the movie not so predictable. For some reason, the movie reminded me a little of "Short Circuit", but the robot in that movie (Johnnie 5) was funnier and the overall writing better. I was also VERY disappointed that the trailer gave away SO many of the scenes. Nobody laughed when he ate the bird because everyone had already seen it. This is not a horrible movie by any stretch, I just wish it was funnier. Expand
5 of 9 users found this helpful54
All this user's reviews
6
ShiiraMar 25, 2011
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Deep in the recesses of an Area 51 warehouse, a CIA-employed "little green man" has none other than Steven Spielberg on the line, discussing with the filmmaker, hot on the heels of his first Indiana Jones movie, what he should film next. Seated at his regulation government desk, Paul(Seth Rogen), the driving force behind all the important scientific and sociological achievements of the past fifty years, gives Spielberg the idea for "E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial", the 1982 classic that turns out to be, not a work of fiction, but a biopic about Paul's first contact with earthlings upon his arrival from the skies beyond. Clive Gollings(Nick Frost), a British sci-fi writer on nerd holiday with his fellow Comic-Con conventioneer Graeme(Simon Pegg), had no doubt seen "E.T." as a tiny lad in some rundown London bijou, but it's the Spielberg knockoff "Mac & Me", the 1988 Stewart Raffill "commercial" that took the marketing practice of product placement to a whole other level, which inspired him down the road to write speculative fiction and sci-fi based comic books. Considering that Paul has such a prodigious grasp of the American popular culture(he takes credit for creating Fox Mulder), the savvy moviegoer would expect the hyper-urban alien to be outraged when Clive speaks of him in the same light as the "Mysterious Alien Creature", Mac for short, whose caretakers keep alive by supplying the co-opted alien with Coke after Coke after Coke. With his mouth fixed in a perpetual "O", Mac has the unintended look of a stroke victim. Hillariously, since Mac can't move his mouth, the furnished soda cans are always equipped with a straw for easy sipping, as a means to help offset the considerable limitations of the completely manual puppet. Unlike Mac who can't talk(you need facial gestures to do that), and most conspicuously, eat(ditto), Paul, on the other hand, yet another triumph of CGI technology, acts and sounds like your typical American male beset with arrested development, and in a wicked send-up of the titular character in John Carpenter's "Starman", eats what he regenerates. Paul may be a little on the crude side, but he never forgot his first love, Tara, whom the alien tried to make amends with over the intervening years through the cinematic arts. (In a bit of fun, fictive movie revisionism, Elliott was supposedly based on Tara.) Although Paul couldn't save the dog his ship landed on during that long ago crash landing, the alien brings the hound's memory back alive, so to speak, through the redemptive powers of film. In the final moments of "E.T.: The Extra Terrestrial", Elliott's dog trots up the ramp to the departing spacecraft, then thinks better of it and turns around. When Tara(Blythe Danner), the little girl who nursed Paul back to health, traverses the same sort of steps(toward Paul's ship) as that celluloidal dog, the seemingly accidental movements of a restless animal in the Spielberg film now takes on a less spontaneous appearance. Turns out the whole damn thing was scripted, a personal aside, from Paul to Tara, as an apology for taking her cherished pet away with his reckless piloting, by foregrounding the dog for a brief moment amidst the tearful goodbyes between E.T. and his humans. "E.T." is a very personal movie for Paul, thus Clive's childhood fascination with "Mac and Me"(co-starring Ronald McDonald as himself) must stick in his crawl, but he remains respectfully quiet, perhaps even, suspiciously so. That's because "Mac & Me" was his idea too. It's the only explanation. He's just too embarrassed to own up to it. At the end of the Christine Ebersole vehicle, the family of mysterious alien creatures gets sworn in as American citizens, therefore choosing Earth over returning back to their desert-like planet. Paul, who probably could have quit his bureaucratic job anytime he wanted to, decides that he prefers his adopted home, as well. These two movies: "E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial" and "Mac & Me", reflect the breadth of Paul's earthly experiences; starting off as a stranger in a strange land and ending with a successful transition into fruitful assimilation. Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
5
PepperMar 20, 2011
If you are a fan of the duo of Frost and Pegg's other movies (such as "Shaun of the Dead") and a fan of the sci-fi genre, I would highly recommend checking out this film. While the humor does leave a bit to be desired, the film itself is putIf you are a fan of the duo of Frost and Pegg's other movies (such as "Shaun of the Dead") and a fan of the sci-fi genre, I would highly recommend checking out this film. While the humor does leave a bit to be desired, the film itself is put together very well and employs a cast of actors that play their parts convincingly. The subtle references to other films in the scii-fi genre are more than enough to make this film watchable. That being said, this film is definitely aimed at a specific group of viewer and, if you belong to the group, you will find it to be a rewarding experience. If you do not, you will likely walk away from the film less than pleased. Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
4
JimmyMcVMar 22, 2011
It seemed like this was the guideline when Pegg/Frost penned PAUL - When in dire need of a laugh, do one of the following:

1) Have a character drop the F-bomb or equivalent. 2) Have a character faint. 3) Make a homophobic comment or dwell
It seemed like this was the guideline when Pegg/Frost penned PAUL - When in dire need of a laugh, do one of the following:

1) Have a character drop the F-bomb or equivalent.
2) Have a character faint. 3) Make a homophobic comment or dwell on the subject. Overall, a lazily written comedy.
Maybe the problem was we needed more action, more *surprising* action: SHAUN OF THE DEAD and HOT FUZZ had plenty of that. Not enough crazy action and, more importantly, not enough Surprises = lame comedy.
Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
4
Btonks1Mar 26, 2011
I found the acting, for a start, to be acceptable, with some cases being quite memorable (Jason Bateman, Kirsten Wigg) If you enjoy good acting, a film worth a watch. However, it falls very very flat on the script, with poor, recycled andI found the acting, for a start, to be acceptable, with some cases being quite memorable (Jason Bateman, Kirsten Wigg) If you enjoy good acting, a film worth a watch. However, it falls very very flat on the script, with poor, recycled and lack luster jokes. This film just has none of the strength of Hot Fuzz or the creativity of Shaun Of The Dead. Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
6
DarkCriticMar 25, 2011
I like watching Paul and it's a decent comedy. Although, it's not as good as Shaun of Dead and Hot Fuzz like everyone else said. But, Simon Pegg and Nick Frost are so cool and they actually pretty good job on their role and that CG alien is aI like watching Paul and it's a decent comedy. Although, it's not as good as Shaun of Dead and Hot Fuzz like everyone else said. But, Simon Pegg and Nick Frost are so cool and they actually pretty good job on their role and that CG alien is a wise crack-in hilarious. Cool movie and it's pretty fun alien road trip flick. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
6
Forrestgump1Apr 30, 2011
"Funny , tho not what i was expecting. Paul has its laugh out loud moments. But i felt like i needed more , when its funny its funny. But this intergalactic comedy needed more flare and R - Rated humor. Paul is spaced about between funny and"Funny , tho not what i was expecting. Paul has its laugh out loud moments. But i felt like i needed more , when its funny its funny. But this intergalactic comedy needed more flare and R - Rated humor. Paul is spaced about between funny and stupid" .. B- Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
QuintexTheGreatApr 14, 2011
Paul

I went into Paul with the highest of expectations being a huge fan of Nick Frost and Simon Peggâ
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
BearDownApr 12, 2011
I think you have to be a fan of the Shaun of the Dead cult to enjoy this movie. I didn't hate the film but it was almost borderline terrible. The kudos have to go to Kristen Wiig. This woman is a very funny comedian. Pretty muchI think you have to be a fan of the Shaun of the Dead cult to enjoy this movie. I didn't hate the film but it was almost borderline terrible. The kudos have to go to Kristen Wiig. This woman is a very funny comedian. Pretty much everything that she does in the film is laughable. Seth Rogan also lends his voice to the alien which helps the case for the movie not totally bombing. Rent it and save some money. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
FruncriticApr 23, 2011
This movie wasn't without its moments and it will definitely keep you chuckling the whole way though, however, despite that, its not a very "good movie." The plot is terrible, the pacing is terrible, and unlike some other recent movies (likeThis movie wasn't without its moments and it will definitely keep you chuckling the whole way though, however, despite that, its not a very "good movie." The plot is terrible, the pacing is terrible, and unlike some other recent movies (like your highness) it wasn't anywhere near funny enough to carry it through its bad story. If you see this movie once, you'll be fine, if you ever watch it more than that...well i'm sorry. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
LeGuruApr 18, 2011
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This movie is not as bad as I expected. I expected it to be really stupid and to pull in a lot of cheap laughs. But honestly, there weren't that many laughs. The movie was not that funny. I mean, what was good about the movie isn't the humor, but the story and adventure. However, this is supposed to be a comedy movie, But it's better that there weren't any stupid laughs than had there been. It was not a very Seth Rogen-like film thank God. I'm not a Seth Rogen, I was expecting some pretty stupid stuff. It was kind of uncomfortable, there were kind of shots at religion, and it sort of made religious people seem stupid, and that hurt a lot, I am a Christian, now that doesn't really affect my views, but it could very well be taken offensive, and it got really uncomfortable. I didn't really take it seriously, and you really can't be a hard core religious nut to like it. The movie gets a 5 because the humor wasn't really there, and the constant religious strikes were not necessary. You could've easily cut it out of the movie, and it would've been a much more solid showing. But otherwise, I think Simon Pegg and Nick Frost did a great job in it, they were very good in it. The gay jokes get a little old, but it's abandoned luckily half-way through the movie. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
AlienLIfeFormApr 28, 2011
I'm a Pegg & Frost fan - they worked together brilliantly in Shaun and Hot Fuzz. This movie had the potential to be another cult follower, but sadly, Hollywood marketed the guts out of it and ALL the good stuff was in the trailers! DearI'm a Pegg & Frost fan - they worked together brilliantly in Shaun and Hot Fuzz. This movie had the potential to be another cult follower, but sadly, Hollywood marketed the guts out of it and ALL the good stuff was in the trailers! Dear Hollywood, when you fill trailers with spoilers and entice fans to spend on anti-climax, you self-defeating morons treat us like dumb aliens. Having said this, I watched a cam version and didn't waste my money on going to the movies (ha ha ha). I'm also a SF and a comedy fan, so if the movie had been as good as anticipated I probably would have paid to have seen it a number of times - so, Hollywood, you get what you deserve!!! Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
RoscoAug 22, 2011
Simon Pegg and Nick Frost are back again with another comedy puting; "Paul." As a huge fan off their work I honestly thought this was sure to be another hit for the duo unfortunately I was left ever so slightly disappointed. Shaun of the DeadSimon Pegg and Nick Frost are back again with another comedy puting; "Paul." As a huge fan off their work I honestly thought this was sure to be another hit for the duo unfortunately I was left ever so slightly disappointed. Shaun of the Dead was a classic British comedies and evidence of two men at the top of their game and they carried this on into Hot Fuzz so I was expecting great things from Paul! It's not a bad comedy it's just not as good as what you'd expect it to be given their record it has his funny moments throughout but it just lacks the sophistication their other other films had and therefore at times leaves you wanting more. The story focuses upon two British geeks travelling to USA on a UFO pilgrimage however on their path come across Paul, an Alien who enlists their help to assist him in returning home, however its not long before trouble arises and their insane roadtrip see's them in a struggle against time to return Paul home. Pegg and Frost are dependable as ever but the true stars here are, first, Seth Rogen who is awesome as Paul, the twist with Jason Bateman was a great idea and Bateman's performance itself was great as was Kristen Wiig who turns in a hilarious performance. A cameo from Jane Lynch was also very well played and for big geeks theres even a cameo from a sci-fi legend in Sigourney Weaver. All in all, Paul is at times great fun that will provide moments of laughter however its not going to live long in the memory like Shaun of the Dead or Hot Fuzz, nonetheless its certainly worth a watch and will have Sci-Fi/Alien fans in hysterics, otherwise don't expect to much. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
rotkuJan 10, 2012
Although not a patch on the brilliant Shaun of The Dead, Paul is an enjoyable part road trip movie, part buddy movie, part E.T remake for the new century. Some great in film jokes and lines which Sci-Fi fans will get. It's not going to setAlthough not a patch on the brilliant Shaun of The Dead, Paul is an enjoyable part road trip movie, part buddy movie, part E.T remake for the new century. Some great in film jokes and lines which Sci-Fi fans will get. It's not going to set the world on fire but switch your brain to off and laugh your way through this film. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
MaxTravisApr 25, 2011
Paul isnâ
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
j30Sep 27, 2011
A pretty funny movie from the guys who brought us side-splitting comedies such as Shaun of the Dead, Hot Fuzz, and Superbad. The only reason I give this a 6 is because I felt the gags were far in between and some of the jokes ran a littleA pretty funny movie from the guys who brought us side-splitting comedies such as Shaun of the Dead, Hot Fuzz, and Superbad. The only reason I give this a 6 is because I felt the gags were far in between and some of the jokes ran a little flat. However, the characters are great (particularly Kristen Wiig's character who is a scene steal-er) and Paul, who I would party with any day of the week. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
AlienSpaceBatsSep 15, 2013
Enjoyable at face value, but unremarkable and formulaic. Humour masquerading as Star Wars references (not funny), Paul plays it safe, setups can be seen a mile off. Most of the jokes have been used elsewhere, to better effect.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
RyanPrattSep 12, 2011
Rent-it - This sci-fi comedy about an alien who needs a ride across the country is not nearly as clever as Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz, but Simon Pegg and Nick Frost's latest creation does serve up some intergalactic entertainment and isRent-it - This sci-fi comedy about an alien who needs a ride across the country is not nearly as clever as Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz, but Simon Pegg and Nick Frost's latest creation does serve up some intergalactic entertainment and is at times hysterical - "at times." Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
HyliadOct 7, 2011
Not a bad movie at all. Never hilarious but funny. Despite some useless characters, the actors (Pegg and Frost of course, but also Jason Bateman) and dialogues are great. It's never really surprising, but many references to the sci-fiNot a bad movie at all. Never hilarious but funny. Despite some useless characters, the actors (Pegg and Frost of course, but also Jason Bateman) and dialogues are great. It's never really surprising, but many references to the sci-fi universe (including a cameo of Alien's legendary lead actress Sigourney Weaver) are enough to having good time in watching it Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
KgnDavelNov 26, 2011
Through the history of my part in metacritic, I've rated only movies and games that deserve it. But this is the first time I've given a score this low. This movie I admit wasfunny and cool, but it felt that all the swearing was unnecessary.Through the history of my part in metacritic, I've rated only movies and games that deserve it. But this is the first time I've given a score this low. This movie I admit wasfunny and cool, but it felt that all the swearing was unnecessary. If you like a movie where they swear you head off, then watch this. If you don't well then you know the answer. Not me I don't like that sort of thing. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
SweGartOct 14, 2011
The first 20 minutes was pretty funny and creative but, after about an hour of Seth Rogan's laugh and a plethora of randomly placed F words, it gets repetitive.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
LaursLacrosseNov 3, 2011
I wouldn't call this the best movie ever. It has a few laughs, and a couple of cool cameos. Steven Speilberg gets help from Paul, which is the best since he directed E.T., so this isn't the best and it's not the worst. It does have a horribleI wouldn't call this the best movie ever. It has a few laughs, and a couple of cool cameos. Steven Speilberg gets help from Paul, which is the best since he directed E.T., so this isn't the best and it's not the worst. It does have a horrible plot, but plenty of awkward, light and funny moments. So enjoy it. But don't expect it to follow you everywhere you go. A good laugh if you need it. B- Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
dareganDec 8, 2011
Basically this movie is a bunch of shout-outs to other sci-fi movies strung together by a weak plot. Yes, these cameos are super cool, especially the big boss at the end, but is it enough to make a movie? Is nostalgia enough to keep you inBasically this movie is a bunch of shout-outs to other sci-fi movies strung together by a weak plot. Yes, these cameos are super cool, especially the big boss at the end, but is it enough to make a movie? Is nostalgia enough to keep you in your seat? Eh, maybe. By the way there is a ton of cursing in this movie, hence the R rating. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
moonman1994Jul 26, 2013
Although Pegg and Frost once again have good chemistry on screen this film is lacking the brilliant writing that their previous two projects (Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz) had. This is because this film did not have the guiding presence ofAlthough Pegg and Frost once again have good chemistry on screen this film is lacking the brilliant writing that their previous two projects (Shaun of the Dead and Hot Fuzz) had. This is because this film did not have the guiding presence of Edgar Wright. Although each of the actors did a fine enough time on screen (and even Seth Rogan was pretty good as Paul the alien) the writing just wasn't all there. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
TrilobiteGJan 13, 2016
It has good intentions this film does. At least this crude sci-fi comedy has some moments of awe and emotion to it right? Seth Rogen plays the character of Paul very well. He is charming, likeable and you attatch to him immediately. ApartIt has good intentions this film does. At least this crude sci-fi comedy has some moments of awe and emotion to it right? Seth Rogen plays the character of Paul very well. He is charming, likeable and you attatch to him immediately. Apart from that, this is a deeply flawed movie. Some jokes don't land, others do. Some plot points make no sense. It's such a shame this was a comedy I remember loving. Now it's just ok, not bad, not too good either. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
spearspitter65Aug 4, 2013
his is a funny but cheasy and kinda retarded movie but it has skill and definantaly does not skimp on the jokes and other retarded moments that u could laugh at
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
FreedomFightersDec 5, 2016
"Paul" is unfortunately a "nothing-special" kind of comedy, but that doesn't mean it was "bad" per se. It's sporadically funny, it's well acted, and it has a solid plot and serviceable writing overall. It's not going to wow you or reinvent"Paul" is unfortunately a "nothing-special" kind of comedy, but that doesn't mean it was "bad" per se. It's sporadically funny, it's well acted, and it has a solid plot and serviceable writing overall. It's not going to wow you or reinvent the comedy genre, but I would definitely say that, as a whole, it works. It's a fun watch, just nothing I imagine you'll want to go back to time and time again. Even so, "Paul" is a decently entertaining film that's worth one watch. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
aadityamudharApr 18, 2016
Although "Paul" isn't strong in script & story as much as "Shaun of the Dead" or "Hot fuzz", the tone is humorous thanks to the friendly Pegg+Frost combo.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
MovieMasterEddyApr 3, 2016
Visiting Comic-Con in San Diego, aspiring illustrator Graeme Willy (Pegg) and wannabe sci-fi writer Clive Gollings (Frost) are in geek heaven, especially when they meet their idol, Adam Shadowchild (Jeffrey Tambor, in a droll cameo). AfterVisiting Comic-Con in San Diego, aspiring illustrator Graeme Willy (Pegg) and wannabe sci-fi writer Clive Gollings (Frost) are in geek heaven, especially when they meet their idol, Adam Shadowchild (Jeffrey Tambor, in a droll cameo). After the convention, they take a road trip in a rented RV, planning to visit all the Southwest’s most famous UFO hot spots, from Nevada’s Area 51 to Roswell, N.M.

En route, they almost collide with another car that runs off the road. The driver turns out to be laidback dude-from-another-planet Paul, who, with his huge eyes, massive head and spindly body, looks exactly like the classic small, gray aliens of yore — apart from his cargo shorts, that is. Assuring Graeme and Clive that he’s in trouble and needs help, and promising that he has no intention of anally probing them, Paul hitches a ride.

Action cuts between the guys in the RV and Paul’s pursuers, another trio made up of hardass Agent Zoil (Jason Bateman) and two goofy rookies, Haggard (Bill Hader) and O’Reilly (Joe Lo Truglio), whose own development is just as arrested as Graeme and Clive’s.

Although it transpires that Paul is on his way to rejoin his mothership, there’s little sense of urgency as he, Graeme and Clive make pit stops along the way. Tension is generated only by whether or not someone else will glimpse Paul; at one stop, Clive becomes smitten with Ruth Buggs (Kristen Wiig), a shy, sheltered fundamentalist Christian with a clouded eye, and they end up kidnapping her in the nicest possible way when she accidentally spots the alien.

One of the winning things about Pegg’s scripts for “Shaun of the Dead” and “Hot Fuzz” (which he co-wrote with helmer Edgar Wright), was the way they managed to riff on the genres they spoofed while still delivering sympathetic, reasonably rounded characters, particularly ones whose heroics were undercut by their exaggeratedly mild English manners. The screenplay for “Paul,” credited to co-stars Pegg and Frost, sticks largely to the same formula, but the transplant to American soil hasn’t proved quite as fertile. Despite a few laugh-out-loud moments, the hit-miss ratio is lower this time around, perhaps due to Wright’s absence. Although the gags never push film in-jokes to the absurd levels of the “Scary Movie” franchise and its ilk, sometimes the nudges (such as numerous references to Steven Spielberg, who literally phones in a cameo) serve to show off the filmmakers’ range of references rather than to further the story.

Meanwhile, the edgy-slackerish sensibility Rogen and Mottola might have been expected to bring to the party lacks the spontaneity of their previous collaborations, “Superbad” and TV series “Undeclared.” Certainly this feels like a bit of a regression for Mottola, taking on a studio work-for-hire after his underrated indie “Adventureland,” while Rogen, constrained by a more-or-less voice-only perf (his movements and expressions have been replicated somewhat for Paul’s animation), sounds like he’s on autopilot.

It’s Wiig who impresses most here with a bravura display of comic timing and some of the filthiest lines in the film (once she learns to cuss, Ruth goes at it with a vengeance). Her character’s sudden disavowal of intelligent design and embrace of hedonism is clunkily written, but the thesp manages to put it across with verve.

Pic is executed with pro polish. Combo of CGI and puppetry to create the charmingly designed Paul is seamless, although the thesps don’t always convincingly pretend that they’re interacting with a character they can actually see, instead of a tennis ball on a stick to create eyeline matches.

Part bromance, part sci-fi spoof and all a bit disappointing.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews