Outbreak

Warner Bros. | Release Date: March 10, 1995

6.6	USER SCORE Generally favorable reviews based on 41 Ratings

USER RATING DISTRIBUTION

Positive:

Mixed:

Negative:

Watch Now

Stream On

Buy on

Stream On

Expand

Review this movie

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.

Check box if your review contains spoilers

0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User score By date Most helpful

SpangleJul 24, 2017

While Wolfgang Petersen may not be the best director of all-time, it is likely impossible to argue that his films are anything less than entertaining. A seemingly chaotic mess of incredibly premises, briefly strong realizations of thoseWhile Wolfgang Petersen may not be the best director of all-time, it is likely impossible to argue that his films are anything less than entertaining. A seemingly chaotic mess of incredibly premises, briefly strong realizations of those premises, and then a descent into cliches that place it strongly in the time period in which it was released, watching a Petersen film is a unique experience. It is like going into a time capsule to see how people from that year really lived and how films were made. Enter Outbreak. A precursor to films such as Contagion, Outbreak is about the spread of a virus from Zaire to America that threatens to wipe out the country in a matter of 48 hours. With a man known for taking chances and going against orders while being rogue/insubordinate regularly, his wife who is divorcing him due to his off-the-cuff style, a goofy assistant who dies part way through, a gung ho newcomer ready to save the day but still too green to be essential, and a military general antagonist, Outbreak is such a mid-1990s film, it almost hurts to watch. Fortunately, under the guidance of Petersen, he turns this quintessentially 1990s slice of cinema into a largely thrilling and engaging enterprise in spite of its flaws.

In writing about Outbreak, it is nearly impossible to gloss over the incredible cast at hand. Starring Dustin Hoffman as Doctor and Colonel Sam Daniels, Morgan Freeman as his boss, Rene Russo as his wife, Kevin Spacey as his assistant, Cuba Gooding Jr. as another assistant, Donald Sutherland as a Major General and Freeman's boss, and Patrick Dempsey as the idiot that spreads the virus, Outbreak is a film with a truly stacked cast. Across the board, the group can get a bit hammy and over-the-top at times but is largely as reliable as one would anticipate. That is a great thing for Outbreak considering how bad the dialogue can often become. Stilted, awkward, and seemingly impossible to have roll off the tongue, this group of Academy Award nominee/winning and/or veteran actors really power through this sloppy script and breathe life into every line. Somehow, watching this bunch go through a sea of cliches, plot conveniences, bloat, and terrible dialogue, remains watchable because of who is acting it all out.

As with any Wolfgang Petersen film, Outbreak manages to really grab viewers by the scruff of the neck and entertain you at all turns. A thrilling experience, Outbreak's haunting and ominous presence with dire predictions around every corner makes for a truly engaging watch. Anchored by assured direction from Petersen who knows his way around a thriller and a typically solid score from James Newton Howard, Outbreak is a film that may be cliched and contrived, but never ceases to be anything less than an entertaining and exciting film. The highlight of this element largely comes in the lab as the team works to identify this virus. What is it? What does it do? What brought it here? What stops it? These are all questions the film has somewhat revealed prior to the doctors piecing it together, but watching them piece together the clues and study the virus is unexpectedly gripping. Petersen paces these scenes terrifically and sprinkles them freely throughout the film. Always ominous and filled with tension, these scenes are where the film really lives up to the potential of its premise and also where the actors are given the best material work with.

Had the film focused solely on this element, it would have been a far tighter and engaging experience. Unfortunately, the film is often quite bloated. While perhaps not that lengthy, there is a shot in Zaire where the camera focuses on a witch doctor doing some sort of ritual. Later, Colonel Daniels asks to speak with the witch doctor only to learn he cannot. The film never comes back to this issue, in spite of dedicating a shot and a specific line of dialogue to him that further called attention to his presence. While perhaps not the most crucial moment, it does hint at the fact that Outbreak could have used another pass through in the editing room. There is some fat to trim here that did little else than extend its running time. A dogfight scene over the forests of suburban California is another source of love handles on the film with Sutherland's Major General McClintock going a tad bit rogue. Overlong with horrifically bad special effects, the scene is both implausible (how could this ever actually happen?) and unnecessary. It is a shot in the arm of unearned and laughably implausible tension that never justifies its presence in the film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

MattBrady99Aug 24, 2020

Wow, I cannot believe most of the cast in this movie have been cancelled.

Anywhere...'Outbreak' is terrifying, especially right now. I mean, just step outside and you will think you are in a movie. I found it eerie how some scenes echo whatWow, I cannot believe most of the cast in this movie have been cancelled.

Anywhere...'Outbreak' is terrifying, especially right now. I mean, just step outside and you will think you are in a movie. I found it eerie how some scenes echo what is happening right now, such as: Lockdown and people refusing to follow health and safety measures. The performances from the main cast helped sell that sense of fear, even though the movie at times does lean back into Hollywood fluff. If only happy endings do exist.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

BroyaxJun 14, 2017

Un gros thriller épidémique hollywoodien sous la houlette de l'expérimenté Wolgang Petersen qui dispense ici une mise en scène très efficace. Le scénario fait parfois de grands écarts rocambolesques malgré ses tentatives pour fournir uneUn gros thriller épidémique hollywoodien sous la houlette de l'expérimenté Wolgang Petersen qui dispense ici une mise en scène très efficace. Le scénario fait parfois de grands écarts rocambolesques malgré ses tentatives pour fournir une expérience plus ou moins réaliste et la guimauve syndicale est de rigueur ici et là, mais rien d'alarmant.

En fait, Dustin Hoffman que l'on voit rarement dans des triple A bien gras de ce genre, parvient à donner une énergie considérable à son personnage en dépit des clichés de l'écriture qu'il doit gérer : c'est la marque des (rares) grands acteurs de ce monde, toujours brillants, peu importent les conditions ! y compris face à la grue Rene Russo, l'épouvantable boulet du film.

Cependant, malgré Hoffman et malgré Freeman dans son rôle habituel d'homme d'honneur à l'insu de son plein gré, le film demeure une grosse machine hollywoodienne limitée et pataude, bête et maladroite : tout dans la gueule, rien dans le sac.

On se lasse donc assez vite de ce film-catastrophe qui tourne carrément à la pantalonnade vers la fin et qu'on oublie aussi vite que l'on peut, afin de s'aérer le cerveau un minimum.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

amheretojudgeDec 11, 2018

Peterson's empty threats fails to scare its characters revolving around it let alone put an entire world on the verge of annihilation.

Outbreak Peterson's empty threats fails to scare its characters revolving around it let alone put anPeterson's empty threats fails to scare its characters revolving around it let alone put an entire world on the verge of annihilation.

Outbreak

Peterson's empty threats fails to scare its characters revolving around it let alone put an entire world on the verge of annihilation. Driven with similar concept, years later Soderbergh itself took charge over such a tale and he too failed on delivering this cautionary tale with any whatsoever flow. Ironically, carrying the tracks of the disease they didn't have much of a big challenge to be fluent but what sticks this wheel from spinning are the characters that it was supposed to map out. Whenever dealing with such a script that takes you over different territories, the characters that comes in to pass the torch forward, ought to have an arc or at least have the potential to leave an impression, but this seems a far fetched concept in here.

Amidst all these disappointments, surprisingly its middle act is a nail biting enthralling drama, from flipping the courts to close calls and from unexpected revelations to an exhilarating chase sequences. And before you know it, that stage is overridden by spoiled dull thrills that are taken for granted along with numb emotions that clearly doesn't go as anticipated. Hoffman as the savior that cracks every pattern and codes is convincing along with Spacey as surprisingly a positive character that still is somehow difficult to digest.

Freeman and Sutherland as the powerful selfish antagonist are your stereotypical one dimensional character alongwith Russo as a sort of love interest. But Cuba is the one that stands alone among all that cries, laughs, fears and rage of his in this crisis. His moving character and his impressive brotherhood equation with Hoffman is both heartwarming and charming. Outbreak, if anything, is a threat to the makers on their investment, to the actors on their talent that goes waste by, and audience that just can't spare the time for its mediocrity.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews