Searchlight Pictures | Release Date: December 4, 2020
7.3
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 342 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
251
Mixed:
59
Negative:
32
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
5
ccmillertxFeb 27, 2021
Should have been a documentary. A very interesting look at 'Nomads' . I like the theme of disillusionment w the American Dream but didn't find it to be very interesting. It did make me grateful and it needed to be made. Just not like this. ItShould have been a documentary. A very interesting look at 'Nomads' . I like the theme of disillusionment w the American Dream but didn't find it to be very interesting. It did make me grateful and it needed to be made. Just not like this. It plods along, very repetitive and uncaptivating. Expand
5 of 5 users found this helpful50
All this user's reviews
6
M_I_K_E_Feb 21, 2021
If you think Nomadland is a great movie you fit into one of two categories:

1. You’re either easily emotionally manipulated (i.e., you cry during hallmark movies), or 2. While you know New York (or fill in the blank here with your city> does
If you think Nomadland is a great movie you fit into one of two categories:

1. You’re either easily emotionally manipulated (i.e., you cry during hallmark movies), or
2. While you know New York (or fill in the blank here with your city> does not comprise the entirety of humanity, you need a reminder every once in a while that there’s a whole world out there with different people and (what? really?) nature (gasp!).

Emotional manipulation is easy - sprinkle in great cinematography, an excellent score, (you can probably stop there for most of us), but also throw in poetry, sprinkle in a few poignant stories from real people with close-ups of the always stoic Frances McDormand reacting to those real stories – shake, and voila! The producers and director of this movie-mentory, or docu-movie, or whatever, went to great lengths to make sure we knew most of the actors in this movie are not actors at all, but real people to get the greatest impact from their mostly sad vignettes. I’m glad they decided to not bite off anything controversial – glossing over the long shifts of an Amazon worker, and only very briefly showing the hard labor of a beet harvester (insert clip of Francis struggling to lift a bag of beets here) – but in a film of this type, where most of the heavy lifting is done by real actors, doesn’t there either need to be some story arc or at least a small lesson? What they did beautifully is present the juxtapositioning of relationships and nature. Linda or Patty (sorry, they kind of run together for me now) gives a very heartfelt dialog about going to Alaska again to swim with the sharks (or something) before she dies and I’m thinking – OK, now we're going to get to the meat of this thing. Is she going to leave her friends and the relationships she’s built to die alone in Alaska? But what I realized is - there really wasn’t much in the way of relationships (at least shown in the film) for her to leave. Every time the camera dolly would follow Francis through the camp, we didn’t see much human interaction. Sure, men would sit with pets on their laps, or someone would play the guitar, or people would sit staring into a fire, but nothing very meaningful from a humanity standpoint was going on. I would go to Alaska too! And this is where the film let us down. There’s a sliver of a chance for great art here - a Winesburg, Ohio (Sherwood Anderson) opportunity to show the loneliness of people – a chance to cut the film to help us appreciate the family and friendships we have. I’m not saying that Francis had to end up staying with Dave at the end, but make us feel the emotional toll of that decision. Instead, they decided not to make any statements at all – to, I suppose, let the film “speak for itself”. The problem is it does not.
Expand
4 of 4 users found this helpful40
All this user's reviews
4
AmovieloverMar 10, 2021
Very good acting, and the movie gives an excellent insight into the plight of seniors who use their car/van/rv as their home.

But, it was a slog to get through.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
6
MattBrady99Jan 25, 2021
“We be the **** of the badlands.”

‘Nomadland’ is one of those movies where nothing much happens, but it’s the type of movie you sit back and vibe with it. This is a very attentive movie, where you journey along with this woman (played by
“We be the **** of the badlands.”

‘Nomadland’ is one of those movies where nothing much happens, but it’s the type of movie you sit back and vibe with it.

This is a very attentive movie, where you journey along with this woman (played by Frances McDormand) who is fed up with her old life and decides to go off grid by traveling to different places while living in her van. She’s not homeless, just houseless. She is like a leaf that quietly and casually drifts from location to location. She encounters different people in this community, who are played by real nomads. Throughout the whole movie you are never in one place for too long, you just keep moving on.

I’ll give director Chloé Zhao and cinematographer Joshua James Richards major credit for they approach to a story like this. Zhao decision to include real nomads with their actual names in the movie as these characters made the story feel genuine and personal, which helps gives us a solid perspective on what life of a nomad is like but done in a respectful way that doesn’t intrude their lives. The cinematography from Joshua James Richards looks beautiful and does a great job showing off the Western landscape. Some locations can look so cold, and yet, other locations look so tranquil in the sunlight.

This movie is worth checking out just for Frances McDormand performance alone, as she is terrific in this movie. She plays Fern, an adventurous woman who is a child at heart, despite dealing with some personal issues from the inside that we are informed about briefly.

Also, I thought the real nomads were surprisingly good. I’m not sure if all the scenes with them are scripted or not, but either way I thought they were great.

While there’s a lot of things that I enjoyed and appreciated about this movie, but unfortunately it didn’t 100% connect with me on a emotional level. At first, I liked the whole open road freedom to the movie, because since the main character is never in one place, you too become a wanderer, but I also feel it misses the opportunity of a powerful character study, especially with a character like Fern when it’s clear that there’s more underneath the surface with her.

I found the pacing of the movie to be an issue for me, because with a two-hour runtime I would sometimes find myself losing interest in the characters and what was happening on screen, as the movie didn’t further develop or do anything with the content and ideas it presents.

While the music was appropriately used for certain scenes, but most of the time it felt really distracting and took me out of the scenes.

Overall rating: Again, there’s a lot of things that I appreciated about the movie and am interested in what Chloé Zhao has up her sleeves for Marvel’s ‘Eternals’, which I hope gives her the freedom to make whatever she wants in the late future, with the extra cash and name recognition.
Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
6
dhaabFeb 22, 2021
Like others have said here, the movie is beautiful and well made, but the characters are not very well developed and many scenes left this viewer wanting more.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
4
Stream2BigScreeMar 7, 2021
Well, Streamers, have you heard about this movie called Nomadland? It recently won Best Picture (Drama) and Best Director at the Golden Globes, and now, it is presumably the frontrunner for the top prize at this year's Academy Awards. I heardWell, Streamers, have you heard about this movie called Nomadland? It recently won Best Picture (Drama) and Best Director at the Golden Globes, and now, it is presumably the frontrunner for the top prize at this year's Academy Awards. I heard the buzz - good things - about Nomadland, and realizing that it is now available on Hulu, I decide to see what all the hype is about. By the title of this review, I have given away my opinion, but read below for more.

Nomadland's synopsis goes something like this: After the devastation of a small Nevada town by the collapse of the local factory, a lady in her sixties, Fern (Frances McDormand) embarks on an unsettled life living as a modern-day nomad. She moves from place to place in her van, taking seasonal jobs and making her way alone. Nomadland is directed by Chloe Zhao from her script based on a non-fiction book of the same name about the nomad lifestyle. The film features real-life nomads telling fictionalized accounts of their lives as well as breathtaking photography of the American West. Fern is just as devastated as the town was from its economic collapse we learn. It is all set up to be a potentially deeply emotional film about grief, self-discovery and loneliness.

Generally, I don't mind character studies, and this nomad lifestyle is intriguing. Why would one decide to live this way? What brought them to where they are? Those questions are explored in Fern's story. Frances McDormand is a good actress and so she's fully embodies this character. However, since the film is also populated with non-actors, who are real-life nomads, it is obvious that there is a naturalistic quality to their presence in the movie. I think it undercuts the fictional narrative. In fact, I'd rather have a documentary about those people and learn the how's and why's of how they came to be nomads. As it is, I was very bored following Fern's story. I checked at least 5 times how long I had to go in this movie. I will say though that the cinematography and the brilliant colors and landscapes of the American West are beautiful, but that is not enough to sustain and almost 2 hour movie.

If you have 2 hours to devote to watching a woman travel across the country doing odd jobs and not much else, then Nomadland may be the movie for you. There is potentially an interesting and emotional story here, but as it is, this movie is not what it could be. I'll wait for the documentary about nomads. For this, you only need on popped kernel of popcorn.
Expand
7 of 8 users found this helpful71
All this user's reviews
4
mohammadhoseinjFeb 26, 2021
It has some good minutes. But sadly, most of the time, It's boring and, for sure, overrated.
5 of 6 users found this helpful51
All this user's reviews
5
jgzegerApr 6, 2021
A highly overrated film. Watching paint dry is more exciting than watching this movie.
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
4
UncleWillardFeb 19, 2021
The movie continuously contradicts itself. It can't tell if it's a tragic look at people who have fallen out of society, or a spiritual awakening for people duped by the American dream. The characters talk about what a tight-knit communityThe movie continuously contradicts itself. It can't tell if it's a tragic look at people who have fallen out of society, or a spiritual awakening for people duped by the American dream. The characters talk about what a tight-knit community they are, full of independent people, but they also complain they are victims. If the script had chosen one of those themes I think it would have worked better. It just thinks it's more poignant than it is. Oscar bait. Expand
5 of 10 users found this helpful55
All this user's reviews
5
shoulderoforionFeb 18, 2021
Meh, mostly boring slice of life flick, about those who've lost homes, or those who never had them to begin with.
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
6
SeekerofStoryMar 24, 2021
Despite the generally good cinematography and good performance by Frances Mcdormand this movie is an empty shell. It features an almost entirely unlikeable character who never grows substantially sprinkled amongst seemingly random shots ofDespite the generally good cinematography and good performance by Frances Mcdormand this movie is an empty shell. It features an almost entirely unlikeable character who never grows substantially sprinkled amongst seemingly random shots of environments. This movie fails on all counts to provide an interesting journey for its character to go through, or for the audience to watch. At every opportunity for something interesting to happen, the story says no. For some reason the filmmaker seems to forget that the primary purpose of cinema is entertainment. Most of the characters, when they do pop up are very bland and mostly forgettable. This movie is only saved by its beautiful shots of landscapes and Frances Mcdormand's portrayal of one of the least interesting characters in the history of cinema. Overall, It is a movie that you can forget exists. I've certainly forgotten most of the movie and I just watched it yesterday. 6/10, and thats me being overly generous. Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
6
everettFeb 21, 2021
Underwritten. And what a shame, given the talents of the actors, not only the always-brilliant Frances McDormand but those who aren't professional actors.
How powerful this film would've been if the screenwriter had mined these roles and
Underwritten. And what a shame, given the talents of the actors, not only the always-brilliant Frances McDormand but those who aren't professional actors.
How powerful this film would've been if the screenwriter had mined these roles and given them the scenes they deserved! And such opportunities for depth: The relationship with the David Strathairn character, Dave, and Fern's sister, who supplies some exposition about Fern's backstory but allows so little understanding of who are they are in themselves, and to each other. "Spare" is what I'd call this kind of writing, and sometimes less is more, but not here. After spending two hours with Fern, I know her life (in minute detail), but I don't know HER. Another underdevelopment: The reasons why these people live with such hardship. There's a systemic reason, and it has everything to do with the Amazon element that figures so prominently as a setting, while missing the opportunity to contrast its workers' lives with those who profit from them. I didn't read the book, but I suspect it would've been a great source for the theme of the chasm between rich and poor that is the nation's growing disgrace. With some flesh on the bones of its script, this movie could have been a true classic. Again: What a shame.
Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
4
JS21Feb 3, 2021
Nomadland has a stunning cinematography, minimalistic directing and great lead actress performance, but it really suffers to deliver the social message with such an apolitical discussion and a painful pacing. The movie brings so manyNomadland has a stunning cinematography, minimalistic directing and great lead actress performance, but it really suffers to deliver the social message with such an apolitical discussion and a painful pacing. The movie brings so many importants them but it doesn't take care to discuss them, forgettable and bland at most. Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
6
CorvinFeb 19, 2021
Nomadland the movie is not Nomadland the book. Every body-breaking horror of capitalism is slowed down and fuzzed away. As any factory or warehouse worker who watches the Amazon scenes knows. As anyone who read the book or worked a beetfieldNomadland the movie is not Nomadland the book. Every body-breaking horror of capitalism is slowed down and fuzzed away. As any factory or warehouse worker who watches the Amazon scenes knows. As anyone who read the book or worked a beetfield harvest knows. The closest thing to the book was the camp host scenes. Hard to gloss over cleaning portapotties, maybe. Not a terrible movie. The book is better. The book is the closest to the real thing you'll get unless you're already living there. And at least the book doesn't blame the victims. The movie has some victim blaming. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
NickTheCritickApr 24, 2022
I didn't like the film for its time management, formal control, script (banal and full of respectability), sound and much more. Film with a classic social message that is fashionable today, but with much less to say than you may think.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
DukeJonJan 22, 2022
slow burn character study which I was amazed to learn has won about a million awards. Understated performance by Frances McDormand, though I found her character to be so self absorbed and unlikeable that I struggled to care what happened toslow burn character study which I was amazed to learn has won about a million awards. Understated performance by Frances McDormand, though I found her character to be so self absorbed and unlikeable that I struggled to care what happened to her. To be honest the "plot" is so thin you could go for a two hour walk in the middle of the movie and not miss anything. Would have been better as a documentary. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
ClariseSamuelsApr 27, 2021
Given the awards and glowing reviews this film garnered, it's hard to stand up and say, "this film bored me." Nevertheless, this was the case. I don't like documentaries about road trips, and I'm pretty sure this is what I just watched.Given the awards and glowing reviews this film garnered, it's hard to stand up and say, "this film bored me." Nevertheless, this was the case. I don't like documentaries about road trips, and I'm pretty sure this is what I just watched. Frances McDormand has noted in interviews that she has often fantasized about chucking it all in and taking off in a van, which in her case sounds more like a romantic fantasy about discovering the true beauty and true grit of America, perhaps something like Steinbeck’s Travels with Charley or maybe even Kerouac’s On the Road.

However, the story pretends to be about social justice, even though it is ironic that the protagonist in real life is a world-famous actress, whose net worth is listed as $30 million and whose husband's net worth is listed by various sources as being anywhere from $20 to $100 million. Half the cast is comprised of actors who are real van-dwellers, and in keeping with this pseudo-documentary style, there is very little plot, sparse dialogue, no dramatic tension, and an ending that resolves nothing.

The film stops just short of romanticizing the lifestyle of the homeless, or as it is rephrased, the "houseless," which makes it sound better, but the film also ducks and basically hides under McDormand's van when it begs the question, how did it come to this in one of the richest countries in the world? Answer: Because there are not enough socialist programs in the United States, and yes, the government has a responsibility to take care of the people, which means, among other things, equitable distribution of income and higher taxes for the rich. This is not a subject that multimillionaire producers want to ponder–they would rather focus on wanderlust and beautiful sunsets.

Thus, there is no talk of the dangerous ultraconservatism that grips the United States, the rampant undereducation of the American people, the outrageous cost of American medical care and prescription drugs, the recent shocking wave of racism and antisemitism, the desperate need for stricter gun laws, and the list goes on. Some of these antecedents helped to land these people in their vans.

Sadly, if social justice is what the director and producers of Nomadland were after, they missed the mark by a mile.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
screenplayhouseApr 28, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. What I'm about to suggest sounds like I didn't 'get' the movie. I actually did, but I'm not sure most viewers did. Please give this take a chance.

If you liked this movie you were moved by the story of Fern, a loner migrant worker trying to survive in a broken American economy. Fighting for every last dollar, living out of her van -- it's heartbreaking.

So if you're a bleeding heart like me -- it was hard to watch this 'Nomad' and her friends barely exist. Things shouldn't be this way, we say. Being a seasonal worker for Amazon, say -- that treats workers poorly.

Once this notion grabs you -- I say -- most viewers fell asleep. Yes, their eyes were open, but they were watching with their hearts instead of their minds. For if their minds were still being objective and observant -- you'd see this movie has a disturbing agenda.

If you go back and watch the Official Trailer, you learn the filmmakers hope and pray you don't see this film a 2nd time. Just see it once, give it Best Picture, and forget this film. What was in that trailer?

Propaganda. Subtle if not subliminal ideas that... well... really don't belong in this type of story. Let's rewind.

The trailer immediately describes Fern as 'Lucky'. Why is that again? Because "she gets to travel". I didn't catch that when I watched the movie but I did when I saw the trailer. Imagine your boss firing you and saying, hey, don't worry -- "Now you get to sleep in late!"

Was that a fluke? If you were paying attention, NOPE. It's actually everywhere in this film.

Was Amazon presented as a 'hard' or 'bad' place to work? NOPE. Everything looked clean, Fern worked at a nice pace, Fern said the pay was great, and at the end of the movie Fern comes back to work some more. (I can't imagine who or what might have slipped the producers of this film to include that message.)

Another 'hidden' sponsor was big tobacco. Hey, if Frances thought it would be realistic to have the character be a smoker (which it totally is) than fine. But do you remember that she didn't want ANYONE telling her she couldn't smoke. While watching her friend die she still loved smoking. Ask yourself why she was so adamant that smoking 'helped' her.

Fern bumps into many 'Shamans' in this story. They all tell her that what they are doing is good. Sticking it to the Man, if you will. Being independent. One goes as far as to suggest these nomads are doing what the original settlers did. That they are a 'tribe', kinda like Indians. THINK about that. Instead of a movie saying it's a shame that America and its corporations do not take care of its workers -- Nomadland is saying keeping your distance from three hots and a cot is a GREAT thing. That you're some kind of Shaman American Indian Rebel Superhero.

And does Fern need a man in her life? There's a gem of one offered but she's like, NAHthanks. Does she need shelter and love from friends? NAHthanks. Does she need her family? NAHthanks. Why she's just happy as hell in the desert running her 'spa'. Aww shucks...

When all this starts to sink you really begin to wonder why people even like this movie. My theory is that the female non-white director and Frances McDormand gave this film a hyper 'cool' feeling that --

-- kept all the viewers in that deep sleep.

Y'all have been PLAYED. Amazon and Big Tobacco want you to think suffering is 'lucky'. And it's as simple as that.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
FaxthtaxMay 28, 2021
A movie that establishes little and concludes nothing. Part movie / part documentary in execution.
McDormand trods along the desolate US highways in a beat up van which is her home while struggling to get money to keep it rolling.
I would
A movie that establishes little and concludes nothing. Part movie / part documentary in execution.
McDormand trods along the desolate US highways in a beat up van which is her home while struggling to get money to keep it rolling.
I would skip this and see "Into The Wild" from 2007 if you have not already. It draws similarities but focuses less on chasing money but more on digging deeper into the characters, and is much better in my opinion.
Frances McDormand has been going strong lately, but she is being awfully typecast. She seems to be hired to play old, grumpy women with a distaste for society (Three Billboards, Olive Kitteridge etc)
Was expecting much but was left mildly disappointed.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
Mauro_LanariJun 2, 2021
(Mauro Lanari)
"Zhao falls into the now usual limits of her cinema: a fragile writing and the difficulty of really dissecting the theme she has chosen" (Alessandro Aniballi). "Nomadland" is not a film about people who are houseless and
(Mauro Lanari)
"Zhao falls into the now usual limits of her cinema: a fragile writing and the difficulty of really dissecting the theme she has chosen" (Alessandro Aniballi). "Nomadland" is not a film about people who are houseless and without a steady job neither by choice nor by no choice. Fern dwells inside a van because she is imprisoned by a trauma that she cannot live with except in a perennial escape. Too private and personal issues to become a representation of the precariousness of existence, among landscape postcards of a nature as majestic as indifferent to the destiny of living beings and in the metaphysical uprooting of a lack of meaning that makes every decision equivalent. In fact, she continues to choose: the nomadic condition in and of the desert, detached from villages and communities in favor of ghost towns, solitude and isolation, abandoning any type of dog to itself. "Nomadland is like Fern, [who] seems to celebrate the feelings [...] of a healthy protest [...] and an unexceptionable autonomy of thought," while she is antipathetic to the limit of an asocial, authoritarian and selfish anaffectivity (Pier Maria Bocchi).
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
ProfAmateurJan 2, 2022
Unpopular opinion: The movie is **** It's a hype in america to watch other people's bad life. It nearly nothing happens in this movie except the same sad piano song for 100times. I think I fell asleep multiple times.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
alfralJan 5, 2022
Despite McDormand grear performance and Chloé's insight on elders life, there are some things I think I have somehow already seen before (not exactly the same, but at some extent) in films as The Straight Story or Into the Wild.
That is the
Despite McDormand grear performance and Chloé's insight on elders life, there are some things I think I have somehow already seen before (not exactly the same, but at some extent) in films as The Straight Story or Into the Wild.
That is the only reason I don't find the film deserves so many 10 out 10 socre across the globe.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
siggi104Dec 20, 2022
Slow burn that amounts to nothing. Maybe I just didn't get into it like I should. Only thing standing out is Frances McDormands acting. Her Oscar win might have been deserved, the best picture win wasn't though.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews