Read User Reviews and Submit your own for Never Let Me Go

8

filmtrashreviewJun 27, 2011

A simple love story. Still films like Atonement and this one bring new elements, twists and turns to the table. Making for a more enjoyable experience as we continue to think about the human condition. There is no need for a screenplay onA simple love story. Still films like Atonement and this one bring new elements, twists and turns to the table. Making for a more enjoyable experience as we continue to think about the human condition. There is no need for a screenplay on this one, the director of this film took it page by page through the story. Refreshing and new, this film will please all fans of the award winning novel.… Expand

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

3

chromateDec 20, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I wonder how a movie can feel fast paced yet drag on at the same time. Probably because this film might have a storyline, but it doesn't have a plot. What I mean by this is that the film unravels in a sequence of time jumps between main characters Ruth, Tommy, and Kathy's childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood, but it hard to see the relevance of each time frame when the characters don't develop-- and so the connection between points on a story line to the overarching plot is lost. Their lack of growth could be intentional to highlight the fact that they are purposefully underdeveloped, but writers give no explanation to their reluctance to break free after "the horrible truth of their true purpose is revealed to them," like the synthesis describes. This is a theme that I noticed throughout the film. Each of the characters, with possible exception to Ruth, don't take influence from anything or anyone around them. When Ruth is the extroverted friend, she has no effect on introverts Tommy and Kathy. This makes it hard to see the relationships between these "best friends," and why they are so close. It begs me to question, why have the character of Ruth anyways? She "keeps" Tommy and Kathy away from each other, but they don't seem to keep their distance. And when Tommy expresses the indifference in his feelings for Ruth, he doesn't do anything about it. Another theme that confuses me. First, the characters aren't even forced to experience thrill in the adventure of learning the truth themselves when their teacher, Ms. Lucy, tells them flat out. But still, they don't do anything about it? It would've been easier to accept if there was a reason, but the fact is just brushed over. These teens who seem so curious and angry about their destined futures don't ask nearly enough questions or look for answers. It makes it hard to connect with the characters and feel emotion when their fate comes. Characters are underdeveloped, and relationships even more. The only positive thing about this movie is that I have a soft spot for the cast members, but with bad writing even good actors can't redeem it.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

RyanGeeSep 28, 2010

Creating a haunting yet provocative science fiction piece of art, director Mark Romenek creates a film that will consume its audience with heartbreak and despair. Never Let Me Go is best approached with little information of the sequentialCreating a haunting yet provocative science fiction piece of art, director Mark Romenek creates a film that will consume its audience with heartbreak and despair. Never Let Me Go is best approached with little information of the sequential plot in Ishiguro's novel. In trying to simplify the premise, the film follows the life of three students deriving from Hailshaim school. The highlight of the film is the performance by Carey Mulligan. She creates so much pathos in her character, it is surreal how real her emotions are. Mulligan executes this film with so much poise; Even her subtle facial expressions create goosebumps. This film is a masterpiece. The cinematography in the film is memorizing; The natural shots and the exposure of the characters reactions add to the chilling manner of the film overall. Moreover, the emotions that are enabled by the casts performances are simply haunting and heart-crushing. I have never seen so many people cry in one movie theater, it is really a defining film in combining drama with science fiction. Technique-wise, Romeneks film is the pinnacle of perfection; But many of its small flaws keep it from being an overall unblemished film. The films pace is much too slow and it some times experiences a directionless path, where it seems that the film is heading towards nowhere. At times there was a lack of forwards which negatively influences the films effectiveness. In addition, while the film does create some great heartbreak, there is somewhat a distance between the characters and the audience. While the cast is not at fault, the plot and given details make the characters only somewhat relatable, it seems as if they derive too much from an alternate world to be one of our time. But in the end, the film is an emotion-provoking film that will strike the heart of its audience in a way that is devastating yet memorable. It does not quite reach perfection, but the beauty, heart, and thought of the film covers its small blemishes.… Expand

8 of 10 users found this helpful82

All this user's reviews

2

DaynaNov 3, 2010

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Saw this at TIFF I don't think have ever been so bored watching a movie in my life. There was no one or nothing to route for. They just sat around and waited to die. At least In the movie The Island, when they discovered what they were in for they fought to stay alive. These people sat around a whined about how unfair it was. I wanted to scream "THEN DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!" But that something never came. I don't respect people who don't at least try to change their circumstances. Awful story, Normal I cry like a baby at these movies and I didn't shed a single tear because I didn't Feel anything for any of them.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

8

PeterWertzOct 11, 2010

I'm overwhelmed. After a summer of crude, overly-budgeted nonsense, the last three weeks have found me in the theater watching films that were thoughtful, mature, and perhaps most resonantly, emotionally razing. It's exciting to arrive atI'm overwhelmed. After a summer of crude, overly-budgeted nonsense, the last three weeks have found me in the theater watching films that were thoughtful, mature, and perhaps most resonantly, emotionally razing. It's exciting to arrive at this time of year as the mood starts to shift along with the caliber, but it's also important to be prepared for it, and I can't say that I have been. I've gone head first into these films with little more than excitement to safeguard me. Today, this trilogy of despair came to its logical conclusion with the lovingly crafted and deeply heartbreaking Never Let Me Go.

The film is based on Kazuo Ishiguro's 2005 novel of the same name, and follows Kathy (Carey Mulligan), Tommy (Andrew Garfield) and Ruth (Keira Knightley), three individuals cloned for the purposes of organ donation. As they brave their short lives in lamentable innocence, they must too deal with the complexities of a love triangle and the absence of so many things the rest of us take for granted. There is no real emphasis on becoming an adult, because it's simply not something these donors will have to worry about. Their lives have been planned to the last detail by people they will never meet.

The story comes in three phases: youth at the Hailsham House boarding school, post-adolescence, and adulthood, which for our characters means the beginning of donations and moving toward "completion," this world's harmonious euphemism for death. While the first phase of the film feels a little numb, this is due more to the hesitant performances of Director Mark Romanek's child actors than anything else. Generally the story rides a line of exposition and elision, handling both fairly well. There's a whole lot of story happening in the world at large, and conveying bits and pieces of it without too glaringly divulging everything is a feat Romanek mostly accomplishes. It's once the film arrives at its second phase and into the hands of its wholly capable adult performers that we see its real strength. This young trio is strong, and Mulligan and Garfield together are phenomenal.

To appreciate what they're doing, it's important to appreciate the complexity of these characters. In a way, these three (and the many others stricken with the plight) are entirely unrelatable. It's not just their inevitable demise and the special circumstances, but the characters utter lack of control and general resignation. While the rest of us would go kicking and screaming through this scenario, these three were born and bred to be forgiving victims. That's not to say they don't have moments of self pity, but these moments are so sparse and so quiet, you occasionally forget the horror of the truth. Kathy in particular has relinquished so entirely her anger, her frustration, her sense of the pure wrongness of this situation, she is somehow simultaneously immensely sad and magnificently strong. Garfield's Tommy though is the truly pitiable character. His innocence is pure and while it lends itself to the notion of Tommy's simplicity, his utter lack of offensiveness in any way makes him perhaps one of the most sympathetic and saddest characters you'll ever witness. Further, the love these three have for each other, though occasionally romantic, is more often simply the kindred love of a family. The kind of undiluted love a person will never be rid of.

As much as death is the most universal conceit known to humanity, Never Let Me Go must be a universally affecting story. Death plays like a merciless, omnipresent villain or the deal-striking devil waiting to take his souls back. Once the film has made its grand reveal, death or "completion" become a part of everything. It all becomes a countdown and while there are no questions of "will it happen?" there is plenty of concern as to what our characters can accomplish before it does. Certainly we hope that they can love, but more than this we simply want their "completions" to feel complete. We want them, like us, to have the opportunity to not regret. Sadly, this seems altogether impossible given Kathy, Tommy and Ruth's perpetual greenness. Paradoxically, their innocence is the thing that keeps them from admitting their innocence. To explain: it's in that space just after childhood and before adulthood that we feel the most confident with our take on the world. It's a flaw and a fluke, but every fresh teenager quite simply knows what's right and what's wrong, what's true and what's false. These characters may be dressed up in naivete, but their sense of duty gives them too a false sense, an undeserved sense of life lived, when in fact they haven't really lived at all. This may just be a fact of life: we foist upon ourselves the idea of wisdom whether or not it exists so as to feel more like the adults we knew as children. With time this wisdom (hopefully) grows into itself, but sadly, maybe too sadly, the children in Never Let Me… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

2

deereadsFeb 12, 2011

I was mesmerized by the book. When I heard there was a film, I wondered how they would make a movie of this quite, emotionally laden, non-high speed action book. I just finished the movie and was dismayed that I bought the DVD. The filmI was mesmerized by the book. When I heard there was a film, I wondered how they would make a movie of this quite, emotionally laden, non-high speed action book. I just finished the movie and was dismayed that I bought the DVD. The film seemed like a made-for-TV video. I personally added emotion to the viewing because I had such an attachment to the book characters. Had I not had that attachment to them prior to watching the film, I would have shut it off and done the laundry or the dishes. I absolutely did not care for the movie. Having said that, I really didn't know how anyone could take all that thought and emotion from the book and translate it to a medium that calls for some action in the conflict. Great Book. Terrible Film. Keira Knightly = ick.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

10

TrophysuckaNov 7, 2010

This movie was excellent. The premise of the story intrigued me so I purchased my ticket and entered the theater with a skeptical expression. I had seen the island but I knew that this movie was approaching it from a wholly different angle,This movie was excellent. The premise of the story intrigued me so I purchased my ticket and entered the theater with a skeptical expression. I had seen the island but I knew that this movie was approaching it from a wholly different angle, providing the aesthetic foresight accompanying the characters and their destinations. I felt immensely invested in the characters; suffice it to say Carey Mulligan's performance gripped me and elicited a strong sense of nostalgia as she progressed through the film. I seldom cry I'm movies but the story of this film, the tribulation they undergo is one that connects to the innermost rivers of emotion we experience as we face the end of something, namely life, and by the end of the film tears streamed from my eyes. The premise of the film sits on the assumption that society accepts the system presented to us in the film, and many elements of the film allow that assumption to flow quite nicely. I look forward to the novel and I encourage all to watch the movie.… Expand

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

2

JonFeb 5, 2011

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I had no expectations to this film, I just read the introduction to what the plot of the film was and then I pressed play. After twenty minutes the film finally reveals what the plot is about, so anyone who have not read the cliffnotes will have no idea what it is about.
I'm gonna sum up this movie in a short dialog.

"Do you want to die?"
- No.
"Too bad, because eventually we will kill you."
- Please don't kill me.
"What are you going to do about it?"
- I'm gonna go sit down in that corner over there and start crying.

I'm not joking, this is seriously the plot of the movie. It is boring, it won't make you think about the theme after you've watched it and you won't feel anything for any of the characters in this movie.… Expand

5 of 10 users found this helpful55

All this user's reviews

5

MarcDoyleSep 16, 2010

As I was watching this movie, I keep thinking about The Island, a movie with a similar scientific premise, but handled in a much more interesting way. Yes, that was a sci-fi action flick, and this is a pure drama, but it seems like almost TOOAs I was watching this movie, I keep thinking about The Island, a movie with a similar scientific premise, but handled in a much more interesting way. Yes, that was a sci-fi action flick, and this is a pure drama, but it seems like almost TOO much of the detail was left out of this movie. And it maintained a slow emotional burn throughout. Almost a bit boring. Doesn't have the emotional wallop like I thought it would have. I was disappointed that Sally Hawkins had such little (though impactful) screen time.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

StevieGJDOct 23, 2010

This is a melancholy and brooding movie with very good acting. There are two stories simultaneously going on. The first has to do with the Orwellian government's purpose for the existence of the main characters. The second is about aThis is a melancholy and brooding movie with very good acting. There are two stories simultaneously going on. The first has to do with the Orwellian government's purpose for the existence of the main characters. The second is about a jealous and petty girl who intentionally thwarts the development of a relationship involving her friend, only to try and make up for it later in her life. The contra-position of these two stories is very interesting. The movies Coma and The Island both dealt with the Orwellian part of this movie's story, both in a completely different (and I would say less successful) way. Those movies assumed that what was happening was so horrible that all one has to do is expose it for it to stop. This movie assumes that it is accepted by society. It ends up being a fresh and unique take on the subject. Well worth seeing and very thought provoking.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

2

asterix11Nov 5, 2010

Disappointing because this could have been a really compelling movie and I loved the premise. The film on it's own has a gaping fatal flaw, a fundamental question REQUIRED for us to continue suspension of disbelief and immerse ourselves inDisappointing because this could have been a really compelling movie and I loved the premise. The film on it's own has a gaping fatal flaw, a fundamental question REQUIRED for us to continue suspension of disbelief and immerse ourselves in the story. Perhaps this is why the book readers rated it higher. It's insulting to the audience not to acknowledge the elephant in the room or even attempt to address it's presence. Maddeningly stupid decision or oversight that reduces the rest of the film to fairly useless fiction.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

Mary7Mar 1, 2011

I love rare films. This is the significance of this film, rareness. When I say this film is rare I mean that you don't see this drama in movies very often. I loved the performances of the actors and the setting. Not to forget how they turnedI love rare films. This is the significance of this film, rareness. When I say this film is rare I mean that you don't see this drama in movies very often. I loved the performances of the actors and the setting. Not to forget how they turned a love triangle to a friendship to last in their memories forever.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

5

ShiiraOct 30, 2010

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It's the saddest music in the world. By itself, Judy Bridgewater's "Never Let Me Go" is just another torch song of no particular distinction, it's what Kathy H. brings to the canned performance; her naivety as a listener which makes the ordinary ballad so heartbreaking, when she misinterprets "baby", the singer's plea to a careless lover, as a petition to a baby, in the literal sense, that he/she "never let [her] go". While the cassette tape plays in the empty dorm room, Kathy H. slow-dances with a pillow, the baby she'll never conceive, in her arms, with Madame watching from outside the doorway, a little bleary-eyed, flummoxed by the young girl's humanity. In an instant, she knows the "gallery" is just window-dressing. These children do indeed have souls. This scene, more than any from the Kazuo Ishiguro novel, demonstrates the profundity of inhumaneness at work here, made all the more strange by the genteel setting of the Hailsham school, whose guardians, despite their advocacy against treating these children inhumanely, still believe that the final solution is a necessary evil. These unseen forces count on the guardians to poison their minds with propaganda about the world outside Hailsham, and the world inside their bodies.This ignorance; this resignation, that these children have been instilled with all their lives, since birth, made them feeble, made them strange. The pantomime Ishiguro describes in his Man Booker Prize-short-listed book, an imitation of motherhood which Kathy H. performs in a context so grossly misapprehended because of her own circumscribed purview, is a grotesquerie that makes the girl too vulnerable, too much like a freak. With the same stiff upper lip he applied to his third novel "The Remains of the Day", the pre-eminent writer of contemporary British fiction has no reservations about putting Kathy H., Tommy D. and Ruth in tragi-comic situations that serve them up for ridicule. Too bad the film version of "Never Let Me Go" chose to iron out the flaws which made the students less bland. They're maladjusted, but the film wants to ensure that audiences like them. In the book, Kathy H. had lots of sex with strangers, Tommy D. didn't seem nearly as thoughtful like how Andrew Garfield plays him, and Ruth was a whole lot more machiavellian at Hailsham, and especially at the Cottages. But most egregious of all, what "Never Let Me Go" loses in the translation from novel to film, is the original meaning of the Judy Bridgewater song, since the filmmaker changes Ishiguro's lyrics by replacing "baby" with "darling", a term of endearment that Kathy H. associates with Tommy D.. The dystopian film loses its key estranging moment in order to make the girl more relatable to the moviegoer, who can better identify with a girl in the throes of puppy love. Kathy H. has a better grip on her feelings in the movie than the book, an effect, however, that makes her indistinguishable from any other boarding school girl with growing pains. Instead of Madame, it's Ruth who's the quiescent observer, and like her best friend, she too seems overtly sophisticated and worldly, not at all how Ishiguro envisioned them, his "poor creatures", as Madame later describes them, but in the film, the jealous girl understands Kathy H.'s designs on Tommy D., understands the gist of the song, which gives her the impetus to steal the boy's heart. "Never Let Me Go" is too conventional for its own good. The love story plays too prominent a role in the narrative, at the expense of the dislocative atmosphere which drives the book, but disappointingly, not the adaptation, whose revamped character seem to understand the difference between love and sex, tears and come, in spite of their limited experiences. As adults, when Kathy H., Tommy D., and Ruth begin to fulfill their destinies as "carers"(Kathy H.) and "donors"(Ruth and Tommy), "Never Let Me Go" pays the price of loving its characters too much. The filmmaker wants the trio to be savvy about love, but naive about dying, but they seem too smart, so when the former Hailsham students don't seem fully cognizant to the fact that "completion" and death are a matter of semantics with little or no differentiation, it rings false. They should escape, but "Never Let Me Go" avoids that banality, so prevalent in the third act of so many genre films, especially science fiction, because Hailsham turned them into good little soldiers who wouldn't desert their mission and escape the fate which awaits them. In one scene, acting on a tip about a boat, Kathy H. drives Tommy D. and Ruth to the coastline, but the boat is purely for sightseeing. Marooned on the sand, nobody seems terribly disappointed that the boat isn't on the water. If it was, would they have the survival instinct to sail away? After Ruth dies, clearing the way for Kathy and Tommy to get their "deferral", why don't they just get in the car and take off?… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

9

shepardnFeb 5, 2011

i will be adding this movie to my library. it was not like all your other vampire flicks that are out their. one you can sit down and enjoy. has a good story line that can be fallowed easy so is a good movie for a crowd of adults. or justi will be adding this movie to my library. it was not like all your other vampire flicks that are out their. one you can sit down and enjoy. has a good story line that can be fallowed easy so is a good movie for a crowd of adults. or just snuggled up on the couch on a snowy day.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

KismetKatSep 26, 2010

First, I must explain that I read the book prior to seeing the movie. I thought it was well acted and caught the mood and tone of the book precisely. Also, it was cast well and I felt Andrew Garfield's performance as Tommy was fabulous.First, I must explain that I read the book prior to seeing the movie. I thought it was well acted and caught the mood and tone of the book precisely. Also, it was cast well and I felt Andrew Garfield's performance as Tommy was fabulous. The reason for a bit lower score is due to (2) reasons: changes in significant events in the book -- don't worry, I won't tell. And, the oversimplification of the dialogue and lack of nuances that are in the book. I realize in order to adapt any book to a movie, much must be cut. But a couple of significant things could have been included and not added too much to the running time. Regardless, I think it's a compelling movie that will leave you with questions for days. And, I recommend you read the book first.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

1

HEI5ENBERGFeb 14, 2011

This movie was sooooooooo boring and dull!!! I found it very unoriginal!!! Keria Knightly is an awful actress!!! She is always doing movies she feels she'll get an Oscar nomination for!!! Any movie that stars Keria Knightly is going to beThis movie was sooooooooo boring and dull!!! I found it very unoriginal!!! Keria Knightly is an awful actress!!! She is always doing movies she feels she'll get an Oscar nomination for!!! Any movie that stars Keria Knightly is going to be c**p that's a guarantee. I lost interest in this movie within the first 30 seconds!!!… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

0

stevebFeb 23, 2011

In 35 years this is the worst film I have ever seen. Boring Boring Boring Boring. The most exciting thing that happened was at the end of the movie watching plastic bags stuck to a fence fluttering in the wind. What a waste of 2 hours of myIn 35 years this is the worst film I have ever seen. Boring Boring Boring Boring. The most exciting thing that happened was at the end of the movie watching plastic bags stuck to a fence fluttering in the wind. What a waste of 2 hours of my life. I have seen all 3 main actors in other films where they have been fantastically directed. They should all feel embarrased by this movie. I would rather watch paint dry than see this film again.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

2

fredphoeshMar 25, 2011

Highly Implausible plot... I kept thinking why on earth wouldn't ALL the organ donors volunteer to be "caregivers" and why would a caregiver opt to become a donor... Acting was good, but the plot was annoying. Its hard to get involved in aHighly Implausible plot... I kept thinking why on earth wouldn't ALL the organ donors volunteer to be "caregivers" and why would a caregiver opt to become a donor... Acting was good, but the plot was annoying. Its hard to get involved in a film when there are such gaping holes in the logic of the narrative.… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

8

DalemNov 7, 2010

A friend of mine who saw this movie encountered a woman after the movie in the woman's restroom crying uncontrollably. It is a sad movie. Though the temptation is to classify this movie as science fiction, I don't think it is. It is moreA friend of mine who saw this movie encountered a woman after the movie in the woman's restroom crying uncontrollably. It is a sad movie. Though the temptation is to classify this movie as science fiction, I don't think it is. It is more an allegory about live and life and death. The young folks in the movies are raised to literally give of themselves and the search for love is the center of their lives. The only thing that is certain is the inevitability of death. Death brings all the characters closer together, encourages them to love, but also separates them. Life in all is beautiful but sad. Unless we are stone cold and ungiving, we are very much like the characters in this movie.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

1

DirtyCashFeb 17, 2011

In an alternative reality taking place in the 20th century, clones of people are being raised in boarding schools for them to grow up as walking organ donors to aid mankind to lead longer lives. The film follows the short lived lives ofIn an alternative reality taking place in the 20th century, clones of people are being raised in boarding schools for them to grow up as walking organ donors to aid mankind to lead longer lives. The film follows the short lived lives of several of them from childhood up, in the most lifeless and dragged out fashion imaginable. There isn't much of a story here, in between the excruciatingly overacted drama and ponderous thought provoking (the term is used loosely here) clichÃ©s, that is. The premise is asinine (Do they transplant brains too? Can't they just create lifeless bodies and put them in stasis until such time an organ is needed or something to that effect) and the execution vapid and nonsensical. Any interesting ground that could have been explored, was conveniently reduced to a heap of hopelessly boring platitudes about inter human connections and done to death ethics involving human cloning. It plods and then plods some more.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

nutterjrJan 18, 2011

so many questions unanswered in a script which tends to linger on details rather than the essence. But the beautiful photography and the masterful performances (especially from Mulligan) make the film worthwhile watching.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

0

MorriBeyApr 24, 2011

I suffered thru the first 20 minutes, skipped a bit forward and suffered some more. It just drags along and it must expect that its audience has an immense reserve of patience as i had to cut it short. Perhaps something happens in the movieI suffered thru the first 20 minutes, skipped a bit forward and suffered some more. It just drags along and it must expect that its audience has an immense reserve of patience as i had to cut it short. Perhaps something happens in the movie but i would rather read the summary than having to endure such a slow death.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

10

brewsterOct 8, 2010

A superbly crafted and thoughtful movie. While skeptics will decry the suspension of disbelief required to accept the film's underlying premise, you will leave this movie in quiet, deep thought. My wife had read the book, for which I wasA superbly crafted and thoughtful movie. While skeptics will decry the suspension of disbelief required to accept the film's underlying premise, you will leave this movie in quiet, deep thought. My wife had read the book, for which I was grateful to obtain a few additional layers the movie omitted. The movie proposes ethical dilemmas of which stem cells are the tiny tup of the iceberg which our planet and our country will soon face. This film forces us to consider these dilemmas, although in a way in which the choices are made too obvious. As technology advances, and our choices become more complex, how will the simplistic sound bites presented by talking heads ever help us understand and choose wisely?… Expand