Monsters University

7

Dune_JumperDec 30, 2013

About time Pixar made a good movie again.
............................................................................................................

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

ROFLoomJun 21, 2013

Much better than Pixar's last 2 attempts (Cars 2, Brave) a cute fun motion picture, beautifully animated of course, just lacks that special Pixar emotional roller coaster. Still holds some Disney magic, and for a prequel fairly well done. IMuch better than Pixar's last 2 attempts (Cars 2, Brave) a cute fun motion picture, beautifully animated of course, just lacks that special Pixar emotional roller coaster. Still holds some Disney magic, and for a prequel fairly well done. I will have to watch it several more times, but as for now I will say its good, not a Pixar classic, but good.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

Nostalgic9tailsJul 16, 2013

A fitting prequel for Monster's Inc., all the way from first meetings of Mike, Sully and Randall to Mike's inner ambitions to be something he's just not cut out to be. The main reason I didn't give this a higher score is that the endingA fitting prequel for Monster's Inc., all the way from first meetings of Mike, Sully and Randall to Mike's inner ambitions to be something he's just not cut out to be. The main reason I didn't give this a higher score is that the ending seemed a bit tacked on and it wasn't as long as I hoped it would be. They seemed to sort of rush the cameos of the first film's characters too, like the Snowman and Roz. Otherwise, the film had that Disney/Pixar charm that I've grown to love, with inventive characters, exciting visuals and the perfect balance of joyous and heart wrenching scenes. It's well worth the price of admission for any fan.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

scott8798Jul 11, 2013

Monster's University is a fine movie, especially for young kids. This movie is more of a prequel, focusing on how Mike and Sully met. It's been 12 years, after all, since we've seen Pixar's favorite one eyed and turquoise monster's. If youMonster's University is a fine movie, especially for young kids. This movie is more of a prequel, focusing on how Mike and Sully met. It's been 12 years, after all, since we've seen Pixar's favorite one eyed and turquoise monster's. If you have kids, take them to see this movie. It has witty jokes and good lessons for lessons. But if you're expecting another Monster's Inc., you might find yourself disappointed. The plot isn't as rich as Monster's Inc. was in 2001, and the theme doesn't transcend as much to adults. Many have said that Pixar's golden age has passed. Personally, I don't believe that we can't see another great movie from John Lasseter, but with recent movies like Cars 2 and Brave, the bar has not been hit. Also, many of the other animation studios have caught up to Pixar. Sony Pictures is creating another Smurfs movie, Fox animation has Rio, and Dreamworks has a couple of strong franchises like Kung Fu Panda and Madagascar. Pixar really has to hit the right nail with Finding Dory.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

DGKZSep 22, 2013

I loved Monsters Inc. when I was a kid and I definitely liked Monsters University too, great production even if I didn't like the story very much. Overall a good throwback to the old days.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

BadbartboyJun 24, 2013

Pixar have redeemed themselves after cars 2 and brave with Monsters Uni, even though it was a prequel that felt a bit unnecessary really we want a sequel to the incredibles) it was a solid effort that reminds people that Pixar still havePixar have redeemed themselves after cars 2 and brave with Monsters Uni, even though it was a prequel that felt a bit unnecessary really we want a sequel to the incredibles) it was a solid effort that reminds people that Pixar still have some form of movie magic although clearly nowhere close to the magic of Toy Story 3… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

SeveredWingAug 22, 2013

A great prequel to a movie that received its fair share of fame when it was first released, but has since really fallen to the wayside. I was delighted to hear this movie was in the mix though a bit skeptical about the plot that had beenA great prequel to a movie that received its fair share of fame when it was first released, but has since really fallen to the wayside. I was delighted to hear this movie was in the mix though a bit skeptical about the plot that had been chosen. Would the movie have a strong enough draw without the adorable "Boo" to ground the antics in a aura of reality? The answer is yes, it does have enough draw. While a kind of 80's comedy flair may be over the heads of most children it gives adults plenty of reason to watch it as well and enjoy many of the subtle jokes that abound in regards to classic films like "Back to School" and "Revenge of the Nerds". A great overall prequel that has both heart and comedy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

genericusenameJun 23, 2013

Not any better or worse than the original. Not as great as other Pixar movies, but it still had that charm Monsters Inc had. It was well written with a basic but enjoyable plot. I was hoping for a little bit more, but it was solid all around.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

callumjsouthDec 13, 2014

Everyone loves Monsters Inc. Now, the same will be true for Monsters University. We dive further into the stories of Mike and Sulley and I was hooked. The film takes advantage of our love for the characters and throws them into a genuinelyEveryone loves Monsters Inc. Now, the same will be true for Monsters University. We dive further into the stories of Mike and Sulley and I was hooked. The film takes advantage of our love for the characters and throws them into a genuinely enjoyable film for all ages. It is one of the more entertaining and admirable Disney films I've seen in a while and it's hard to find flaws. Despite all the positives, it's most obvious flaw is that it's not as good as Monsters Inc. Which is sad, but understandable.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

DCMarvel18Jul 2, 2013

I don't see why there is so much hate for this movie. I'll admit it's not Pixar's best film, but it's definitely not it's worst. I enjoyed all of the references it made to the first film, some are hidden, so look out for those. This movie hadI don't see why there is so much hate for this movie. I'll admit it's not Pixar's best film, but it's definitely not it's worst. I enjoyed all of the references it made to the first film, some are hidden, so look out for those. This movie had a lot more action than I expected. It also had it's fair share of comedic moments, but not as much as I expected. This movie introduces a whole plethora of new characters with spectacular actors to do the voices such as Helen Mirren as Dean Hardscrabble, Nathan Fillion as Johnny Worthington, and my personal favorite, Charlie Day's character, Art. Don't listen to the critics, this movie is still filled with loads of Pixar-y goodness that any fan of animated films will enjoy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Knockout4Jul 13, 2013

This doesn't nearly deliver as much nostalgia as we'd expect from the great PIXAR, but is certainly a step in the right direction, and definitely provides an entertaining and humorous experience.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

EpiclukoJul 9, 2013

Going into this movie, I thought it would be extremely underwhelming, mainly because of it main setting. However, I found myself enjoying it very much. It may not be as timeless as its predecessor, but M.U. holds its own with its enjoyableGoing into this movie, I thought it would be extremely underwhelming, mainly because of it main setting. However, I found myself enjoying it very much. It may not be as timeless as its predecessor, but M.U. holds its own with its enjoyable characters, great animation and fun humor.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

MurozakiJul 10, 2013

It may not achieve the quality level of the first one, but 'Monsters University' still have the soul that resides on it's charismatic characters and it's Pixar's best film since 'Toy Story 3'.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

Ryguy50Jul 27, 2013

As far as Pixar movies go not the best, but as far as most movies go pretty good and definitely worth seeing if you were a fan of the first installment

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

8bitParadoxJan 18, 2014

[REUPLOAD]
I don't see why there is so much hate for this movie. I'll admit it's not Pixar's best film, but it's definitely not it's worst. I enjoyed all of the references it made to the first film, some are hidden, so look out for those.[REUPLOAD]
I don't see why there is so much hate for this movie. I'll admit it's not Pixar's best film, but it's definitely not it's worst. I enjoyed all of the references it made to the first film, some are hidden, so look out for those. This movie had a lot more action than I expected. It also had it's fair share of comedic moments, but not as much as I expected. This movie introduces a whole plethora of new characters with spectacular actors to do the voices such as Helen Mirren as Dean Hardscrabble, Nathan Fillion as Johnny Worthington, and my personal favorite, Charlie Day's character, Art. Don't listen to the critics, this movie is still filled with loads of Pixar-y goodness that any fan of animated films will enjoy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

joao1198pedroOct 31, 2013

this film is terrific but it isn't so great as it was the first monsters inc,but this film is absolutely great and he is one of the greatest films of this era of pixar.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

ambenderDec 28, 2013

Pixar's latest is a sweet, and frequently hilarious, follow up to a movie that I consider to be one of the studio's greatest. While it doesn't capture the original's creativity, it boasts plenty of humor and memorable characters.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

KayakMar 3, 2014

I have to admit, I was pleasantly surprised with this. Pixar have hit this coming-of-age slant to their cleverly timed sequels/prequels out the park. This captures the charm from the first movie with some surprisingly competent new conceptsI have to admit, I was pleasantly surprised with this. Pixar have hit this coming-of-age slant to their cleverly timed sequels/prequels out the park. This captures the charm from the first movie with some surprisingly competent new concepts to add to the already creative screenplay and caters comically and conceptually to both the kids and those, like me, who have reached university age. Maybe not as great for those not in this age range, but it certainly struck a chord with me.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

SparklinDiamondApr 27, 2014

I liked this movie, but it was no Monsters Inc.. The original is one of my favourite Pixar movies, so this did slightly disappoint me. It was funny and interesting but it just cannot live up to the original in my eyes. However, I would watchI liked this movie, but it was no Monsters Inc.. The original is one of my favourite Pixar movies, so this did slightly disappoint me. It was funny and interesting but it just cannot live up to the original in my eyes. However, I would watch it again!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Delaforce828Oct 13, 2014

I was definitely satisfied with this film and it's colorful visuals, great character designs, and decent writing. I'd still have to put it next to their lesser films because I still don't think it's as good as Monsters, Inc. Although despiteI was definitely satisfied with this film and it's colorful visuals, great character designs, and decent writing. I'd still have to put it next to their lesser films because I still don't think it's as good as Monsters, Inc. Although despite that I'd still give it a pass, Pixar are definitely stepping up after Cars 2 and getting better with their films, and storytelling.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

WheelzFourReelzMar 19, 2015

It's predictable and cliché, but Monsters University is a solid film that definitely steers Pixar in the right direction after their two misfires. It's funny, heartfelt, and just a good time.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

MovieManiac83Apr 24, 2015

For Pixar, Monsters University stops the bleeding. In the wake of two disappointing films, 2012's lackluster Brave and 2011's misfire Cars 2, the animation company has returned to solid footing with a prequel to their 2001 entry, MonstersFor Pixar, Monsters University stops the bleeding. In the wake of two disappointing films, 2012's lackluster Brave and 2011's misfire Cars 2, the animation company has returned to solid footing with a prequel to their 2001 entry, Monsters Inc. Although there is undoubtedly a financial foundation for mining past successes, Monsters University is nevertheless a charming, family friendly endeavor and, although it falls short of the best Pixar has brought to the screen over its long association with Disney, it's nevertheless worth a trip to the theater, especially for kids.

As was true of Monsters Inc., Monsters University gets most of its mileage out of the atypical friendship between the big, furry Sullivan (voice of John Goodman) and the little green Cyclops Mike (Billy Crystal). Since Monsters Inc. effectively wrapped up going-forward story possibilities, the creative team elected to go the prequel route, so this is the tale of how Mike and Sullivan met, overcame an initial rivalry, and became friends. Although pitched at a level that won't bore adults, the film's content is kid-centered, complete with life lessons about the values of friendship, cooperation, and believing in oneself and others.

Computer generated animation has long since reached a plateau level where the artwork results in the kinds of "oohs" and "aahs" that it once did. We rarely notice the richness of detail evident especially in the background the way we once did because every animated film boasts this - it's expected. Monsters University maintains the standard of quality expected from Pixar although, as is too often the case, the incorporation of 3-D is of dubious value. Seen in 2-D, this is a bright, cheerful motion picture. The tradeoff for getting things to pop off the screen is that the colors aren't as vibrant. I feel like a broken record making this comment: some animated films benefit from 3-D but it's hard to argue that Monsters University is one of them.

Pixar's decision to develop some of their most popular movies into franchises hit a rough patch when Cars 2 failed to perform up to expectations. Monsters University, however, makes the argument that this may have been an unfortunate exception. Although the second Monsters movie won't challenge Toy Story 2 or Toy Story 3 as the best sequel to emerge from the studio, it's a strong enough animated film to rise to the top of summer family-friendly fare. The energy and comedy are strong and the only thing off-color is the palette when seen through 3-D lenses. This isn't a home run for Disney/Pixar but it's a solid double.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

moviemaniacsMar 6, 2016

A College centric prequel to Monsters Inc., Monsters University is unfortunate proof that the animation studio previously known for its brains is now resting a little too heavily on its nominal brawn. Monsters Inc.'s success came from theA College centric prequel to Monsters Inc., Monsters University is unfortunate proof that the animation studio previously known for its brains is now resting a little too heavily on its nominal brawn. Monsters Inc.'s success came from the imaginative land of Monstropolis, evoking a sense of place through quotidian and nuanced details of urban life and an industrial workplace. Instead of merely relying on a previously created world, this origin story envisions the loveable monsters as freshmen undergrads, allowing storyboard artist turned director Dan Scanlon to reintroduce the central characters while still creating a new, meticulously detailed campus setting. The college grounds are dappled with gothic-spired buildings, hacky-sacking students, and aptly annoying orientation leaders, and the animators approach the milieu with an acknowledging, whimsical clarity on which Pixar prides itself. Where Monsters University or: How Pixar Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Formula stumbles, though, is the lack of originality it exhibits in its stale storytelling.

The film is primarily seen through the eye of diminutive Mike Wazowski (voiced again by Billy Crystal), a green ball of sass who's yearned to be a “scarer” ever since a grade-school trip to the familiar factory where screams from children are turned into energy. What he lacks in stature he compensates for in moxie and idealism, and Mike is set on becoming a scarer despite being told by school bullies that he—more goofy than grotesque in appearance—doesn't belong on the scare floor. James P. Sullivan, a.k.a. Sulley (voiced by John Goodman, the deepest-voiced freshman of all time), on the other hand, is a braggadocious beast from the illustrious Sullivan family of scarers and, given his imposing figure and naturally loud roar, he looks the role. It's an uninspired, if expected, dichotomous setup of rivalry, pinning Mike's book smarts (he's read all the Scare Theory he can get his claws on) versus Sulley's inherited talents (“You don't need to study scaring. You just need to do it,” Sulley says, sounding a bit like a naïve art-school brat).

After a scrappy fight between Mike and Sulley during the final exam of Scaring 101, which results in the destruction of a precious souvenir owned by the frigid Dean Hardscrabble (Helen Mirren), the twosome are kicked out of the program and forced to switch their major to Scare Can Manufacturing. Grasping at a chance for redemption and re-entrance into the scaring program, Mike signs up for the Greek Council's Scare Games (“A super intense scaring competition,” the horned, letter-jacket-wearing meathead organizer shouts). Mike enlists in the tournament with the only fraternity available, the oddball-filled Oozma Kappa (the nebbish clans acronym, “OK,” lends an amusing, if eventually tiresome, visual gag) and reluctantly allows former nemesis Sulley to join. Mike brazenly agrees to an ultimatum with Dean Hardscabble: If his team wins they'll all gain admittance to the scaring program, and if they lose Mike and Sulley will be expelled from the university.

The Scare Games—overly reminiscent of certain tournaments for famous young wizards—occupies more than the second half of the film's overlong, nearly two-hour runtime; from here, writer-director Scanlon and two co-writers unimaginatively layer on event after event, eschewing innovative construction in favor of a predictable and tediously structured run toward the finish line as the underdogs consistently scrape by each challenge. Their main foes, unsurprisingly, are preppy, popped-collar alpha monsters and a hardly present sorority (a regressive step since Pixar released the female-driven Brave just a year ago). Monsters University refreshingly picks up some steam in the home stretch, showing a glimmer of the original's cleverness as Mike and Sulley must elicit true horror to scare a more mature audience; the joy of this set piece, however, is still buried under thematic backlogging, as the Aesopian morality about cherishing uniqueness, playing off individual strengths, and overcoming failures through hard work are pressed on even harder.

Despite Monsters University's candy-colored, eye-popping visuals, the sensibility feels off: The plot is more creaky than creative and the humor more forced than embedded, leaving the audience to choke on dust instead of laughs. Lacking in Pixar's trademark sly wit and thematic maturity, the film is unfortunately representative of the once-peerless animation studio's further slide toward the creation of merchandising over magic.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

AaronDWassermanJun 26, 2015

A very fun origin to the Monsters films. It is entertaining as hell and so beautifully done. I was very impressed watching this film. Because I was not expecting much.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

CineAutoctonoJan 24, 2018

"Monsters University" was a slightly good movie, tell us the beginnings of Mike and Sullivan, in the middle of the university and at least the story was good but do not stop enjoying it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

FilmMasterEdJan 6, 2016

For Pixar, Monsters University stops the bleeding. In the wake of two disappointing films, 2012's lackluster Brave and 2011's misfire Cars 2, the animation company has returned to solid footing with a prequel to their 2001 entry, MonstersFor Pixar, Monsters University stops the bleeding. In the wake of two disappointing films, 2012's lackluster Brave and 2011's misfire Cars 2, the animation company has returned to solid footing with a prequel to their 2001 entry, Monsters Inc. Although there is undoubtedly a financial foundation for mining past successes, Monsters University is nevertheless a charming, family friendly endeavor and, although it falls short of the best Pixar has brought to the screen over its long association with Disney, it's nevertheless worth a trip to the theater, especially for kids.

As was true of Monsters Inc., Monsters University gets most of its mileage out of the atypical friendship between the big, furry Sullivan (voice of John Goodman) and the little green Cyclops Mike (Billy Crystal). Since Monsters Inc. effectively wrapped up going-forward story possibilities, the creative team elected to go the prequel route, so this is the tale of how Mike and Sullivan met, overcame an initial rivalry, and became friends. Although pitched at a level that won't bore adults, the film's content is kid-centered, complete with life lessons about the values of friendship, cooperation, and believing in oneself and others.

Monsters University's plot thrives on predictability although there is a moderately surprising twist toward the end that allows the proceedings to extend by about fifteen minutes and provides an opportunity for a little more depth. For adults, the movie is less about narrative than enjoying the back-and-forth repartee of Mike and Sullivan, who have all the chemistry of, say, Felix and Oscar. These two are mismatched buddies in the classic sense and Billy Crystal and John Goodman have no difficulty sliding back into the roles they originated a dozen years ago. And, although Monsters University will appeal strongly to young viewers, it's not juvenile in its approach or content. As a result, those who enjoyed Monsters Inc. as children need not be ashamed of being "uncool" by watching Monsters University in their teens. (G-rated movies are generally shunned by anyone over age 12 who isn't a parent.)

Computer generated animation has long since reached a plateau level where the artwork results in the kinds of "oohs" and "aahs" that it once did. We rarely notice the richness of detail evident especially in the background the way we once did because every animated film boasts this - it's expected. Monsters University maintains the standard of quality expected from Pixar although, as is too often the case, the incorporation of 3-D is of dubious value. Seen in 2-D, this is a bright, cheerful motion picture. The tradeoff for getting things to pop off the screen is that the colors aren't as vibrant. I feel like a broken record making this comment: some animated films benefit from 3-D but it's hard to argue that Monsters University is one of them.

Pixar's decision to develop some of their most popular movies into franchises hit a rough patch when Cars 2 failed to perform up to expectations. Monsters University, however, makes the argument that this may have been an unfortunate exception. Although the second Monsters movie won't challenge Toy Story 2 or Toy Story 3 as the best sequel to emerge from the studio, it's a strong enough animated film to rise to the top of summer family-friendly fare. The energy and comedy are strong and the only thing off-color is the palette when seen through 3-D lenses. This isn't a home run for Disney/Pixar but it's a solid double.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

FuturedirectorAug 1, 2016

At least, Docter's still showing his one-of-a-kind creativity. But it's style may be some kind of different, so the results change, with an appropriate cast, but a predictable story-telling, this film is not one of the bests of Pixar. ButAt least, Docter's still showing his one-of-a-kind creativity. But it's style may be some kind of different, so the results change, with an appropriate cast, but a predictable story-telling, this film is not one of the bests of Pixar. But anyway, it has funny parts and colored pictures. It's still being enjoyable, anyway.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

CasuallyJan 14, 2017

Dependable Pixar magic that lives up to the original without stepping on it's toes. Mike and Sulley's adventures are a joy to watch and this motley cast of inspired characters set up a brilliant story. Unfortunately, however, it fails toDependable Pixar magic that lives up to the original without stepping on it's toes. Mike and Sulley's adventures are a joy to watch and this motley cast of inspired characters set up a brilliant story. Unfortunately, however, it fails to deliver the emotion expected of an underdog tale. The conclusion feels somewhat of a shirking of responsibility to allow the prequel to harmonize with the original. For an easy watch Monsters' University is often hilarious and will bring a nostalgic smile to any viewer.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

MonkiReviewsMay 22, 2017

They didn't make this movie as well as the original. It stars a younger version of the characters, but they look mostly if not all the same. The story itself is not great though, but not bad. It is worth watching though.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

FilipeNetoMar 26, 2022

After the success of the first film (although it was a success heavily amputated by competing films), it was predictable that Pixar would bet, sooner or later, on a film that continued with the same revenue as the first. The follow-up,After the success of the first film (although it was a success heavily amputated by competing films), it was predictable that Pixar would bet, sooner or later, on a film that continued with the same revenue as the first. The follow-up, however, had to wait more than ten years in the drawer, and ended up not being a sequel, but rather a prequel that shows us how the main characters met and their journey.

The script is not original, and the story is very similar to a thousand other films in an American high school or university environment, but the fact is that it works well. It begins with Mike and Sullivan's arrival at Monsters University, where they must attend a degree in Scare, the most prestigious degree the university has to offer. However, the highly respected college headmistress is extremely demanding and will not like them at all, taking advantage of an unfortunate incident they cause to expel them, based on Mike's inability to instill fear and Sullivan's total neglect of studies. However, Mike is determined to graduate and prove his worth, and will take advantage of a college scare competition to challenge the headmistress.

The film proved to be a very honorable continuation of the first film: the prequel works well and the characters we liked in the first film are almost all present (of course the human girl is not). Thanks to a very well written script, we see how they get to know each other, and how their friendships and enmities are forged. There are many intentional similarities between the University of Monsters and Harvard University, and the US academic environment is well reproduced here (being totally different from the Portuguese or European university environment). The digital animation is exquisite, the drawings were very well executed, there is excellent color and brightness throughout the film and the soundtrack seems to me to have been better and better chosen this time around. For the voices of the characters, the film once again summons John Goodman, Billy Crystal and Steve Buscemi, to which well-known actors such as Helen Mirren, Alfred Molina or Joel Murray will be joined.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

ErikTheCriticOct 11, 2018

Although it does not quite as good as the original, it's still good fun for families. Kids will burst out with laughter, and adults will pull a silly grin on their face here and there.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

goncalocoutoFeb 9, 2019

"Monsters University" é um filme inteligente e divertido que consegue cativar a atenção das crianças (com as animações deslumbrantes) e dos adultos (com as piadas sobre os universitários).
7/10

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

BrunoVn00Apr 8, 2019

It's just a fine movie, but we all expect an outstanding level of quality for every Pixar film and while this is still a decent movie and pretty entertaining an funny, it doesn't live up to other Pixar movies in the past.
There's nothingIt's just a fine movie, but we all expect an outstanding level of quality for every Pixar film and while this is still a decent movie and pretty entertaining an funny, it doesn't live up to other Pixar movies in the past.
There's nothing really emotional or any real conflict. Sure it has a basic but good message about not letting anyone underestimate your abilities and potential, but I feel like that concept wasn't well developed at the end, because our lead characters basically give up and learn nothing (except Sully I guess, but only stopped being a careless showoff).

Overall this is a fine movie, actually really entertaining but I'm sure you won't get anything other than just a good time.

I hope the director Dan Scanlon does a great job with Onward (2020) as that movie will truly demonstrate if he's a talented animated movie director. I can't say that for this movie because this guy had to handle a source material that wasn't of his property.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

WiholkeJan 19, 2021

Cars 2 and Brave back to back was a pain, but now PIXAR has returned to something familiar and fun. Some people do not like this movie, but I am not one of those people. This movie is super fun, super enjoyable, and a breath of fresh airCars 2 and Brave back to back was a pain, but now PIXAR has returned to something familiar and fun. Some people do not like this movie, but I am not one of those people. This movie is super fun, super enjoyable, and a breath of fresh air coming right after two of some of the worst movies in PIXAR's catalog. Monsters University is a prequel to Monsters, Inc., and this time stars Mike Wazowski. Cars 2 did something similar in trying to make the secondary character the main character in their sequel and it backfired horribly. Luckily for this film, it works very well as Mike Wazowski voiced by Billy Crystal is excellent and very charming, and gives a lot more depth to his character we didn't see in the original. The whole movie is enjoyable, but the only part that comes close to the quality of the first Monsters movie is the last third of the movie, which comes in suddenly when we think the movie is wrapping up. This last third is really good and I wish the rest of this movie was like it. As time went on, I started to enjoy this movie a lot more, and my family and I watch it often. I would say this is the PIXAR film (post-Toy Story 3) that we watch the most.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

atabeyordekciAug 18, 2021

A look at the relationship between Mike Wazowski (Billy Crystal) and James P. "Sully" Sullivan (John Goodman) during their days at Monsters University, when they weren't necessarily the best of friends. (7)

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

JJ2FAS4UDec 31, 2021

----------------------------------6.7/10-----------------------------------

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

BKMNov 19, 2013

Monsters University occupies the middle ground when it comes to Pixar sequels. It's not as innovative or emotionally resonant as Toy Story 2 or 3, but it's a great deal more fun and engaging than the needless Cars 2. The animation is soMonsters University occupies the middle ground when it comes to Pixar sequels. It's not as innovative or emotionally resonant as Toy Story 2 or 3, but it's a great deal more fun and engaging than the needless Cars 2. The animation is so gorgeous and the voice work so accomplished, that you almost don't notice that the plot and characters are paper thin.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

DarkCriticJun 23, 2013

Monsters University is the new 14th Pixar animated feature and the prequel of the biggest animated classic, Monsters Inc. Since 12 years of making the new prequel where monsters are planning to go college first before they started to work atMonsters University is the new 14th Pixar animated feature and the prequel of the biggest animated classic, Monsters Inc. Since 12 years of making the new prequel where monsters are planning to go college first before they started to work at the company. Monsters Inc. is very creativity film with big laughs, great animation design of monsters, and a great story, but this new movie is quite different and it's not as good as the original. The back story takes place where Mike Wazowski (Billy Crystal) is going to university and he's learning to become a scary monster, so he can scare children in closets around the world. Mike has to team up with Sulley (John Goodman) and the rest of the non scarier students to help them out to prove themselves to become very scary, so that the dean will not kick them out from the university. We meet our colorful friends in the university like Randall from the first movie, two headed monster Terri & Terry Perry, the owner of the club Don Carlton, and the other colorful monsters. The university is pretty cool to look at like the background is pretty neat, the animation is pretty bright, and the design is unique from the first movie. Monsters University is okay for most children and family will enjoy, but unfortunately the movie is pretty average and it wasn't that spectacular like the original movie. The main issue is that characters are not that interested and story needs to take time where both heroes who started at the university. It reminds us that the college and university is coming back to learn something we already knew from the start and we can't quite decide of whether we learn from the past or we want is another generation. Surprisely, the movie tries so hard to make this prequel and it didn't quite expect to coming back to learn everything we already did. Thumb Down.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

6

JacobJul 3, 2013

While it may not be Pixar’s finest work Monsters University is still entertaining. The film made me chuckle a few times and as a way to kill some time it was not a bad way to spend it. If you are a little kid or a fan of Monsters Inc. checkWhile it may not be Pixar’s finest work Monsters University is still entertaining. The film made me chuckle a few times and as a way to kill some time it was not a bad way to spend it. If you are a little kid or a fan of Monsters Inc. check this one out because you will probably really like it. It is about on the same level as its predecessor providing the same likeable characters from the first film, which fans of the original will be overjoyed to see again, and a cute story that will make you smile and chuckle from time to time. It is slow and boring at times but as the film goes on it becomes more and more engaging making it something that is worth checking out. If you are hoping for something on the same level as Up or Toy Story 3 this film is not for you but if just want to see something cute that will keep you busy for an hour and a half check Monsters University out. This is a cute little film that is more or less as enjoyable as its predecessor.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

netflicJul 1, 2013

The higher the bar is set the harder is to keep it. That is the case with the new Pixar's animation movie "Monsters University", prequel to "Monsters, Inc." Even though it is a decent Pixar movie, professionally done and pleasant to watch, itThe higher the bar is set the harder is to keep it. That is the case with the new Pixar's animation movie "Monsters University", prequel to "Monsters, Inc." Even though it is a decent Pixar movie, professionally done and pleasant to watch, it is not nearly as good as the first one. "Monsters, Inc." became a classic right away, this one will not…… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

monster_mealJul 8, 2013

The animation was, as always, quite spectacular. As far as laughs and story go, I felt like this fell a little short of what I would expect from a studio with such a legacy. Is Disney just...forcing them to make these sequels/prequels atThe animation was, as always, quite spectacular. As far as laughs and story go, I felt like this fell a little short of what I would expect from a studio with such a legacy. Is Disney just...forcing them to make these sequels/prequels at this point? I seem to remember a time when it felt like Pixar was pretty damn creative.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

hoops2448Sep 2, 2013

I went into Monsters University with very little in the way of expectations and I came out surprised and disappointed at the same time as the prequel to Monsters Inc is both wonderful and aggravating at the same time. When Mike WasowksiI went into Monsters University with very little in the way of expectations and I came out surprised and disappointed at the same time as the prequel to Monsters Inc is both wonderful and aggravating at the same time. When Mike Wasowksi (Billy Crystal) arrives at Monsters University he meets rebellious James Sullivan (John Goodman) and the two tangle to become the greatest scarers until they are forced to team up to avoid getting expelled. University does manage to avoid the pratfalls of prequels by keeping the story light and narrow in scope while filling the film with a brand new crop of monsters and a few choice cameos for longtime monsters fans. However it also lacks that Monsters Inc had, a no holes barred adventure with a beautiful ending. University is fun and has some action in it but it lacks the guts of its predecessor and feels like its lacking because of it. As usual the animation is stellar with Pixar constantly raising the bar on themselves but it all feels similar. If anything, Monsters Inc has robber University of the awe this film would have caused as a stand alone feature. Crystal and Goodman are having fun doing the voices yet again as these two really come alive. The film depicts the beginning of a beautiful friendship and it finds its heart through this odd couple pairing but it lacks the child like innocence of Inc and ultimately if there is no Boo then you won't be able to achieve the same effect making it a good thing University doesn't try to.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Bruce722Nov 16, 2013

Monsters University is a pretty decent movie but it lacks a lot of the charm the first film had. I think a lot of that has to do with how original the story was initially and how that unique element is lost a bit in further iterations. IMonsters University is a pretty decent movie but it lacks a lot of the charm the first film had. I think a lot of that has to do with how original the story was initially and how that unique element is lost a bit in further iterations. I think Boo provided a lot of the charm in the first movie as well. It wasn't so obvious until watching a movie without her. Obviously Mike and Sully were both great but the competition with which the film is built upon feels a little weak. I know, it's a children's movie, but that's kind of the problem. While Monsters, Inc. was a film that the adults could appreciate, this one is more of a pure kiddy flick. It's still entertaining to a certain extent but without a lot of the depth from the first one, it's ultimately just a fun kids movie and not much more.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

mrniceDec 29, 2014

Colorful, really really colorful. I like a lot about this movie, but the enthusiasm stayed in the "mildly positive" territory, for some reason. Maybe it lacked deep symbolism or poetry... like, it didn't have a flying house or somethingColorful, really really colorful. I like a lot about this movie, but the enthusiasm stayed in the "mildly positive" territory, for some reason. Maybe it lacked deep symbolism or poetry... like, it didn't have a flying house or something similar, that you remember as a representation of a message/morale. More like a lot of scenes built for fun, and that's it. They deliver, but that's it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

InspectorJJul 20, 2013

With fluid animations and a great cast, this prequel falls short with the story; it was far too basic and simple, making me assume the target audience was solely for children. However, even if aimed for children, there was no definiteWith fluid animations and a great cast, this prequel falls short with the story; it was far too basic and simple, making me assume the target audience was solely for children. However, even if aimed for children, there was no definite antagonist, making a good story difficult to conjure. The humour was quite minimal and most of the story predictable, although not every second film goes without connections; it was nice to see the back-stories of some characters that appeared in the first film, and how they got into their ‘situation’, but one small character towards the end did seem quite forced, as if they had run out of ideas to throw in.

As a general film? Good.
But as a Pixar film?
Disappointing.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

ReubenIsAGodSep 14, 2013

Eh, it's okay. Not the most fantastic of flicks. It suffer froms just being quite bland. It also feels rather unnecessary. But eh, we got it nonetheless, it's a good time, plays it safe. And is very fun.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

TimGJun 23, 2013

It was a lot of set up in the beginning, so the story seemed to lag. Didn't really pull me in until close to the end. My kids seemed bored with most of the movie, except for bits here and there.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

SeriosityJul 18, 2013

Perfunctory. While entertaining and fast-paced, Monsters University lacks originality and genuine emotion. Toy Story 3 feels like it was ages ago now.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

bob516Jul 3, 2013

If this came from any other animation studio I would have said this was a perfectly serviceable comedy, with a touch of a deeper meaning. But this is from Pixar, and I start with such high expectations. Pixar has brought us to someIf this came from any other animation studio I would have said this was a perfectly serviceable comedy, with a touch of a deeper meaning. But this is from Pixar, and I start with such high expectations. Pixar has brought us to some wonderful places, the hidden worlds of toys, ants, fish, even rats. Imaginative places like Monstropolis, Earth 700 years in the future, Radiator Springs, and a floating house. In this movie we went to college, without anything wondrous or imaginative revealed. I really hope Pixar can return to the gems it created for so many years, otherwise I will not be rushing to see their movies in the theaters.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

BrianMcCriticJun 22, 2013

Not a bad film but nothing special from Pixar. I am a big Monsters inc. fan and I really like the characters of Mike and Sully, but I was hoping for a more spirited effort.

6 of 9 users found this helpful63

All this user's reviews

6

Skullgirlsfan13Jul 20, 2013

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Monsters university was an interesting idea at first, to know about the origins of the monster world, and to just see more from these characters that we loved back in the day. after seeing this movie, I'd rather go on not seeing this. A highly negative sounding comment sure, but this is nothing to be shunned or hated, this is just not that great. You would think that anything Pixar made would be not amazing, but recently they have been losing their edge in the long lasting joy that their previous films had. Now about the movie, it starts off pretty normally with the reason why Mike would want to be in the scarring business. Now that I think about it, what else is there to do in their world? Does everyone have to be a part of the scarring world? I do remember that there was one monster that had a fruit stand, but that's it. Anyways, the rest is just cuteness in my opinion. That's the level of sophistication in this movie: not all the intelligent, but still good. The other main character Sully is completely different from his previous alliteration; for best in my opinion, because it's great to see change from before to present. Which is also a problem for me, they do it good with Sully, but Mike is the same from the first movie, and I didn't like him all too much from that last film. The only other character they show again is Randell, and it's a little funny what they do with him; him being a nerd and friendly, but they never really show that event that really turned him into the jerk he was in the last film. The cast is pretty neutral, they don't leave any impressions, but they're also enjoyable during the time I watched them. The funny moments really were the moments where they showed little easter eggs from the first movie, but that's it. My last thing I'll talk about ii where Mike finds out he can't be a scarer is too harsh. So it turns out he goes to the human world to try and show that he really does have what it takes, it's so mean spirited that he does all the work needed to and has all the dedication, and still cannot be what he always wanted to be is pretty cruel. I know the message was that we all have a special place in society, but that message is kinda not that great. Overall this is an okay movie; showing the development of at least the character I liked most, but not really doing anything that'll have a lasting appeal is so out of place for Disney.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

knnthp3Jun 28, 2013

I took my kiddos to see Monsters University this weekend and they absolutely loved it. For me, I wasn't a huge fan of Monsters Inc and this movie is much of the same as that movie. It's just an "ok" movie and I wasn't nearly as excited forI took my kiddos to see Monsters University this weekend and they absolutely loved it. For me, I wasn't a huge fan of Monsters Inc and this movie is much of the same as that movie. It's just an "ok" movie and I wasn't nearly as excited for this movie as I am for Despicable Me 2 or Turbo. The story is decent with a very good message of defy expectations and be who you want to be.

Monsters University seemed to miss some really good opportunities at comedy and isn't the type of movie that the adults are going to talk about after seeing. I love Billy Crystal and Mike is by far my favorite of the film but Monsters University never really gets going in terms of "great" It is better than both of the Cars movies, which I cannot stand, but not on the same level as Toy Story or Incredibles. The Scare Games which become the focal point of Sully and Mike's adventure are a lot of fun and will make a great video game on the Wii U.

This movie could've come straight to DVD and I think it would've done well. I think that is where I believed this movie should've ended up on, straight to DVD along with Lion King 2 and Little Mermaid 2. Both of my kids loved it and if you have children this is a good trip to the movies, however, with so many family films looming my recommendation is unless you truly LOVED Monsters Inc, wait for a different family movie to burn your money on.

I notice a lot of people on here hated Brave, however I loved that movie and found it a great and imaginative Pixar story. Brave was better than this movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

MrEpic012Jul 18, 2013

As A Film On It's Own It's Marvelous But Being A Sequel To One Of The Best Pixar Movies Ever It's Decent The Animation Is Good, The Story Is Hit, Miss, The Characters The Main Ones Are Unforgettable Except For Randall He Isn't In The MovieAs A Film On It's Own It's Marvelous But Being A Sequel To One Of The Best Pixar Movies Ever It's Decent The Animation Is Good, The Story Is Hit, Miss, The Characters The Main Ones Are Unforgettable Except For Randall He Isn't In The Movie Much The Supporting On The Other Hand I Forgot Like 90% Of Them But it's Still Good Even With Those Flaws… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

agentKmurphJul 22, 2013

Pixar films traditionally have that indescribable touch to them that always keeps you watching and Monsters University maintains that touch. I really felt the characters come alive, both metaphysically and visually. The personalities andPixar films traditionally have that indescribable touch to them that always keeps you watching and Monsters University maintains that touch. I really felt the characters come alive, both metaphysically and visually. The personalities and emotions are well portrayed and the visuals were simply astounding. It was also very interesting to see how they developed the characters and explained a little behind Mike and Sully's friendship. Monsters University also features lots of a great slapstick humor to keep you laughing for days and as always, it is endearing to all age groups which is of course another hallmark of Pixar.

The Pixar touch aside, I did find the plot disappointing. It felt incredibly stock a standard tale that has been heard a thousand times before. Sure, it had a few unexpected twists and turns but even despite them, you could often guess the next five minutes at any given point in the movie. Pixar is better than this. They invented the wild crazy world of Toy Story where the plots were as unpredictable the next new character. They produced The Incredibles which finally gave us some superhumans to talk about other than our beloved mid twentieth century comic book heroes. They gave us Up, WALL-E, and Finding Nemo. All great stories that kept you wondering what happened next. Monsters University on the other hand...like I said. You could forecast ahead more than was acceptable. Boring! Still for what its worth, it was enjoyable. Not Pixar's best but certainly not their worst either.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

FranzHcriticOct 25, 2013

I watched this out of dedication to Monsters Inc., a film that I love since it's release. But this was completely childlike and had no direct statement unlike the first film. Kids at least six years old would like this, but not me.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

francisjairam12Jul 6, 2014

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Now where do I began with this. Now when I went to see Monsters University in theaters last year I was disappointed. The Story doesn't make too much sense. I understand this is a prequel to Monsters Inc but the way it plays just doesn't excite me. It starts off with Mike going to University to becoming a scary Monster. He finds himself having a hard time trying to roar. Then Sully comes along and he became a jerk towards Mike. Also the monster Deam Hardscrabbble says that the monsters have to complete an exam to determine if they scary enough to become a real monster. If the exam is failed then they are out of the scary program. Which is understanble. I will admit there are some funny scenes but something about the characters didn't appeal to me. Anyways when the final test comes Mike has to prove himself that he is a scary monster after all the training they did. But when Mike scared the simulated kid he automatically wins (which by the way that was a small roar). Mike becomes suspiscous and learns that Sully was the one that made him when. Meaning that he made Mike cheat. He becomes so upset he goes into the Human world from a door. Sully has to find him and apolgize. Soon the cops (in the human world) came to look for the monsters. Sully and Mike set up an abush where Sully comes out and the ropes tangled the cops and Sully roars loudly at the cops causing the scream cans in the Monster world to go crazy. Even HARDSCRABBLE was surprised. So after that incident Mike and Sully were expelled. Meaning they haven't learn a thing. Then after that they find a work place at Monsters INC factory (which marks the begin of Monsters INC) and thats when the movie ends. Overall this movie is a guilty pleasure to me, it didn't have that same emotion to it like Monsters Inc did and the story doesn't make too much sense. So yeah I give it a 6.5/10. You may disagree with me but thats how I felt in my opinion… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

spongeswiftJun 15, 2018

This movie isn't bad by any means BUT it was such a disappointment compared to the first one that it tarnishes the film's charm. Overall the baseline idea wasn't bad but a sequel would've been better and really was more requested. But anywaysThis movie isn't bad by any means BUT it was such a disappointment compared to the first one that it tarnishes the film's charm. Overall the baseline idea wasn't bad but a sequel would've been better and really was more requested. But anyways I thought this film was ok. Mike and Sully's group of friends was really charming and the "villain" is really well executed. Overall this film may be a disappointment but it is still a pretty ok movie to me.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

MrMovieBuffFeb 5, 2016

This was truly when Pixar Animation Studios were scraping the bottom of the barrel. Making a sequel to the widely loved 'Monsters, Inc' (2001) was just filler so Pixar could release another film to try and continue to dominate the animationThis was truly when Pixar Animation Studios were scraping the bottom of the barrel. Making a sequel to the widely loved 'Monsters, Inc' (2001) was just filler so Pixar could release another film to try and continue to dominate the animation industry.

The story mainly focuses on Mike (voiced by Billy Crystal) going off to Monsters University to become a well-known and famous scarer, but he bumps into the popular and soon to be legendary James P. Sillivan aka "Sulley" (John Goodman), and they develop this kind of rivalry that becomes slowly more competitive than ever.

The biggest issue this film has is that it is a prequel, and not a sequel. Considering that this movie was released well over a decade after the classic 'Monsters, Inc' (2001), there could have been a chance where a sequel's story focuses on the young girl Boo being a teenager, and maybe Sulley and her lose that special connection because we all know that teenagers can be difficult socially. Maybe Boo has a boyfriend, or even a child, and her close monster friend, Sulley, can find this very hard to deal with.

The story here is very paint-by-numbers and, like most sequels, it's very predictable. This is truly Pixar being desperate for sure.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

RobertOBrienJul 28, 2015

This movie gets extra points for having a mature and awesome message. It's certainly a challenging message for kids to accept, but it's definitely something they should accept.

Other than that, the first hour and 20 minutes drag. It's justThis movie gets extra points for having a mature and awesome message. It's certainly a challenging message for kids to accept, but it's definitely something they should accept.

Other than that, the first hour and 20 minutes drag. It's just college movie cliche after college movie cliche, and if it was trying to satirize these college movie tropes, it wasn't very funny.

The last couple of scenes are fantastic, like, Finding Nemo levels of fantastic, but it's a shame the rest of the film couldn't have been as strong.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

MovieManiac1994Jan 4, 2016

Before embarking on this return visit to the wacky alt-world of 2001’s Monsters, Inc. , the brains at Pixar went looking for “all the great movie prequels” and came up empty-handed.

They have a point. Backstory probing may be all the rageBefore embarking on this return visit to the wacky alt-world of 2001’s Monsters, Inc. , the brains at Pixar went looking for “all the great movie prequels” and came up empty-handed.

They have a point. Backstory probing may be all the rage right now, but there has yet to be a preboot that truly stands toe-to-toe with the film or films that spawned it. Blame George Lucas if you like, but it’s a format with many more strikes against it than home runs on its score card.

Not only that but a prequel almost always comes with a whiff of creative desperation, its raison d’être invariably owing more to a corporate balance sheet than a blue-sky brainstorm.

All of which appears to stack the odds against Monsters University , the latest evidence of what has become a troublingly repetitive streak for Emeryville’s princes of the pixel (last year’s Brave excepted, this is the third release in a row to be based on an existing title – and Planes , out August 2013, will be the fourth).

Shouldn’t the outfit that brought us Finding Nemo , Up and WALL.E be looking for more beautiful one-offs? It’s the basis of an argument, but one that can wait to be thrashed out another day.

As it is, Pixar’s 14th feature turns out to be an exuberant, vibrant and busy romp: some way from a classic, but perfectly acceptable on its own second-hand, retro- fitted and unapologetically derivative terms.

The last time we saw fanged furball James ‘Sulley’ Sullivan (John Goodman) and green eyeball on legs Mike Wazowski (Billy Crystal), they were best buds working side by side on the Monsters, Inc. scare floor.

Director Dan Scanlon starts his movie in the same place, but only to introduce Mike as a child and his life-long fascination with the heroic ‘Scarers’ who generate Monstropolis’ power by traumatising dozing human infants.

Determined to become one of their number, the adolescent Mike enrols at the titular MU in the hope of joining its prestigious Scare Program.

In his way, however, stands a certain turquoise ogre: the aforementioned Sulley, a cocksure campus hotshot who – unlike his more cute than creepy roomie – doesn’t need to hit the books to terrify the tots witless.

Turning firm friends into sworn enemies may not be the most original of plot twists, but it’s enough of a rethink to have University challenge our creeping sense of déjà vu.

Nor does it hurt to introduce a competitive element, an accident involving a prized possession of the fearsome Dean Hardscrabble (a dragon-centipede hybrid imperiously vocalised by Dame Helen Mirren) compelling our heroes to sign up for the all or nothing ‘Scare Games’ in order to rejoin the ranks of the collegiate elite.

With rounds involving flesh-swelling stingers, a giant tentacled librarian and a maze straight out of Pac-Man, it’s the Tri-Wizard Cup in all but name.

Its real function, though, is to help warm up the Mike/Sulley bromance, as well as fostering a sense of community within the sad-sack ‘Oozma Kappa’ fraternity to which they have reluctantly been forced to pledge.

The various members of this dotty brotherhood – a five-eyed blob, a two-headed nerd, a long-limbed cousin of The Muppets’ Animal and a sticky old mature student – make for a spectacular posse that leaps off the screen even if you’re not watching the film in the now requisite 3D.

And while cynics might point out that the Disney Store will now be stuffed with as many merchandise-friendly critters as (in)humanly possible, who cares when it gives us such colourful peripheral characters as the purple-haired babes of ‘Python Nu Kappa’ and the squealing Scare Pig mascot of ‘Roar Omega Roar’?

The freakish ingenuity is the movie’s main, ahem, selling point – though it can’t quite compensate for a fundamental shortage of freshness.

Alas, Scanlon and co always seem to be one clawed step and slimy trail behind Pete Docter’s milieu-defining predecessor.

That’s not to say there isn’t fun, excitement and sporadic laughter to be had, not least in a climactic sequence that sees Mike realise his true calling. The message too is a surprisingly bracing one for a family animation: sometimes you have to face up to the fact that just because you want something, that doesn’t make it so.

But then if Monsters University says anything, it’s that even if you’re not at the top of your game, you should still go out there and give them a show – which is exactly what the film does.

Pixar falls back on the tried and tested in an entertaining caper that will be a surefire kid pleaser this summer. Old favourites are always welcome, but it would have been nice to see some more new ideas too.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

reviewfrom19842Jan 8, 2017

Pixar's weakest film Monster University is just an mediocre kids film .

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

sunoblakDec 27, 2017

Una historia de cómo se pueden romper las barreras de jerarquía social, Mike no es nada sin Sullivan, Sullivan no es nada sin Mike.
Una bonita historia amigable con el público llena de clichés segregativos e irrespetuosos propios de lasUna historia de cómo se pueden romper las barreras de jerarquía social, Mike no es nada sin Sullivan, Sullivan no es nada sin Mike.
Una bonita historia amigable con el público llena de clichés segregativos e irrespetuosos propios de las universidades americanas. Una película necesaria para dar un orígen a los personajes, pero nada memorable.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Sarcastic_DevisDec 6, 2021

Ok.

Si lascia guardare, diverte in diversi tratti, ma non lascia chissà quale forte impressione. Neanche il terzo atto riesce a sollevare il film dall'essere mediocre (considerando gli standard dello studio). Poi qualche cliché qui e làOk.

Si lascia guardare, diverte in diversi tratti, ma non lascia chissà quale forte impressione. Neanche il terzo atto riesce a sollevare il film dall'essere mediocre (considerando gli standard dello studio). Poi qualche cliché qui e là potevano pure toglierli.

Consigliato? Sì.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

DolphinReviewsJul 20, 2022

It's a nice animated movie that adds to the lore of Monsters Inc with some good action, humor and emotion.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

TheQuietGamerNov 8, 2013

I really expected more from Pixar, especially considering how fantastic Monsters Inc. was. Unfortunately this prequel ends up falling short,. Not only does it fail to live up to its predecessor, but it also fails to live up to Pixar'sI really expected more from Pixar, especially considering how fantastic Monsters Inc. was. Unfortunately this prequel ends up falling short,. Not only does it fail to live up to its predecessor, but it also fails to live up to Pixar's reputation for animated movies.

It's got some humorous moments, but everything from plot to the characters falls short in my opinion. It ends up feeling very dull and predictable unlike most of Pixar's previous works. There are some good things here like Charlie Day's character, watching the Randall and Sully rivalry start, and it will keep kids entertained, but it is one of Pixar's lames efforts. It disappointed the huge Monsters Inc. fan in me, and as a prequel it failed to add anything that would make me rethink events of the first movie. Really I expected more from Pixar.

This is a huge disappointment. It captures none of the Pixar magic and stands beside Cars 2 as one of Pixar's rare disappointments. It may be worth a rental if you were a huge fan of the original and have small kids, but for others it may just be better to skip this and keep those fond memories of Pixar still intact. This does some pretty big damage to their reputation.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

csw12Jun 24, 2013

Pixar has created some of the best movies over the last decade because of their originality, cleverness and genuine emotion. Monsters University has virtually none of those qualities which makes the movie like a standard animation film, whichPixar has created some of the best movies over the last decade because of their originality, cleverness and genuine emotion. Monsters University has virtually none of those qualities which makes the movie like a standard animation film, which is a disappointment for Pixar.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

5

puzo340Jun 30, 2013

June 23, 2013

'World War Z' is a fast-paced, exciting thriller, which blends the horror, action, and science-fiction genres generally well. Brad Pitt gives a decent performance as Gerry Lane, but the film fails to create a real connectionJune 23, 2013

'World War Z' is a fast-paced, exciting thriller, which blends the horror, action, and science-fiction genres generally well. Brad Pitt gives a decent performance as Gerry Lane, but the film fails to create a real connection between the viewer and Pitt's family. 'WWZ' ends up being an above average film, which provides a nice new look at an oft-visited idea.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

5

pkstarstorm823Jul 21, 2013

Monsters University is once again a failed attempt from Pixar. The jokes were too cheesy, the plot seemed cliche, and it pretty much sucked. Wouldn't recommend it...

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

BarneyOnMTJan 5, 2016

WHAT I LIKED: It takes the characters we loved and continues to develop them and the franchise. 'Monsters University' is still entertaining and captures some of the magic of it's predeccessor
WHAT I DIDN'T LIKE: Unlike the first, this feelsWHAT I LIKED: It takes the characters we loved and continues to develop them and the franchise. 'Monsters University' is still entertaining and captures some of the magic of it's predeccessor
WHAT I DIDN'T LIKE: Unlike the first, this feels more basic, dull and uninventive in terms of plot, and it looses the emotion we felt in the original.
VERDICT: Not as memorable as 'Monsters Inc,' this fails to hit the mark. It's still a lot of fun for kids though… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

SrPepeJan 6, 2018

La verdad que no me gustó mucho, no le llega de cerca a la primera y a ninguna de Pixar en general.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

GemsicleNov 6, 2022

A flick that tells the origins of Mike and Sully's scare experience and their "first encounter" which was not here, but actually in elementary school, according to the trailer during the previews in the VHS of Toy Story 2.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

imthenoobOct 14, 2013

It's not that it's a bad movie, It just never really gets good. It's some-what funny, The new characters aren't that like-able, and they could have focused more on the back-story through out instead of little bits here and there. I agree withIt's not that it's a bad movie, It just never really gets good. It's some-what funny, The new characters aren't that like-able, and they could have focused more on the back-story through out instead of little bits here and there. I agree with csw12's review 100%. It has none of the qualities of a great animated film, It's just painfully generic and that's what so disappointing about it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

dingythingyAug 20, 2013

The movie started off OK but towards the end, it got progressively boring.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

All_ButTrU4Jul 6, 2022

This time around sulley & mike aren't as interesting. I can respect the attempt even with all of its awkward dates comedy and loose plot but I won't say I enjoyed it. The movie feels vacant of it's sharp new Yorker sarcasm and instead aThis time around sulley & mike aren't as interesting. I can respect the attempt even with all of its awkward dates comedy and loose plot but I won't say I enjoyed it. The movie feels vacant of it's sharp new Yorker sarcasm and instead a neutered parody… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

clem666Oct 17, 2021

I've got very mixed feelings about this movie. Proposing a sequel to the unavoidable and iconic 'Mosters, Inc.' required bravery and an unwavering dedication. Can't say I'm truly disappointed by the result. However it is far from beingI've got very mixed feelings about this movie. Proposing a sequel to the unavoidable and iconic 'Mosters, Inc.' required bravery and an unwavering dedication. Can't say I'm truly disappointed by the result. However it is far from being excellent.

There are many assets: the animation is gorgeous, colours are appealing, characters are lovable (for the majority of them), the story is full of twists and turns, there are funny easter eggs making significative bonds between prequel and this movie, we learn a bit more about Mike, Sulley, Randy and the universe they all live in. Some jokes manage to be funny when not too childish.

But there is a major 'but' ! Story fails to evoke any precise and powerful emotion, it feels like nothing really matters. Characters evolve in a very predictable and linear way all along the movie. Many characters are just shadows of themselves: funny ones make giggle, bad ones cause bad events, and main characters don't do much to deepen the plot. The pace is really jerky and events lose a lot of value just to allow one cheesy joke and a dumb wink as easter egg. We can honestly feel the desperate efforts to make today's children embark in an adventure started years and years ago. As an adult who watched 'Monsters, Inc.' with great pleasur during his childhood, I can't help but recommend to stay away from this below average pre-heated childish movie.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

Gregorj58Jun 30, 2013

This felt like more of a cash grab then an actual movie. The message for kids was rather lame. Certainly not in the league of Up! Or Brave. It wasn't really bad, just meh.

0 of 5 users found this helpful05

All this user's reviews

3

FilmQueenOct 30, 2015

As much I loved Monsterc Inc. , I couldn't enjoy this prequel at all. Maybe it's entertaining for babies, I don't know, but the plot was non-existent and I could not find a single truly funny joke either. It's one of those movie which wereAs much I loved Monsterc Inc. , I couldn't enjoy this prequel at all. Maybe it's entertaining for babies, I don't know, but the plot was non-existent and I could not find a single truly funny joke either. It's one of those movie which were obviously only created because the first one was a success and they wanted to make more money despite the fact that they did not have a single idea for a new movie. Don't watch this just because you liked the first one, you probably won't like this one.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

3

JP32Feb 4, 2019

For a studio that made its name with storytelling strong enough for parents to enjoy, it's almost shocking to see something as trivial as a "big game" as the movie's centerpiece. Monster's University's story barely qualifies as a DisneyFor a studio that made its name with storytelling strong enough for parents to enjoy, it's almost shocking to see something as trivial as a "big game" as the movie's centerpiece. Monster's University's story barely qualifies as a Disney Junior Original, never mind a Pixar product.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

bigfoot6463Jun 25, 2013

Nothing exciting here to be found. This movie could have been a movie for the record books but falls way to short. Nothing close to the 1st movie. Wait to see it for free on tv.

2 of 25 users found this helpful223

All this user's reviews

0

CuriosoMar 24, 2014

The movie should have been called "A couple of losers in the University"
And the moral for kids is: Don't waste your time studying. You can be a "successful loser".

1 of 9 users found this helpful18

All this user's reviews

0

TheCoolGuy99Dec 22, 2013

Monsters University is Pixar's first prequel and none other the less manages to bring the total scope of the story from Pixar's Monsters Inc. (2001). It's flicking sweet and provides more of a solid performance than its sequel (Monster'sMonsters University is Pixar's first prequel and none other the less manages to bring the total scope of the story from Pixar's Monsters Inc. (2001). It's flicking sweet and provides more of a solid performance than its sequel (Monster's Inc.) centered on the two main protagonist Mike (Billy Crystal) and Sully (John Goodman). And now for the first time Pixar has introduced their very first prequel this film actually better thought as a fun family entertainment for all ages,

More on centered from the life of the two main characters. This film shows exactly the whole life of the two and the rest of all the characters in Monsters Inc. Undeniably more good than its sequel better than out to be. It also bring us their bond, closeness, friendship, family, and hilariously funny moments. It has more of the heart from 104 minutes of awesome 3D experience from Pixar

Rating 9 10… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

Monsters University

User Reviews