Janus Film | Release Date: August 17, 1983
7.9
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 24 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
19
Mixed:
3
Negative:
2
Watch Now
Stream On
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
8
TrailesqueAug 23, 2021
In an impressionistic series of scenes, Tarkovsky shares with us the memories of his childhood: his deep attachment to his mother, his mostly absent father, encounters with some interesting people, and his love for the Russian countryside.In an impressionistic series of scenes, Tarkovsky shares with us the memories of his childhood: his deep attachment to his mother, his mostly absent father, encounters with some interesting people, and his love for the Russian countryside. Tarkovsky, whose father was a poet, considered himself to be one also, and many of the images are a kind of visual poetry: e.g. the slow, moving shots of a burning barn and a wind blowing across a yard. Much of it is beautiful and moving in an indirect way. Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
8
iCampoRamilNov 16, 2021
Una fumada de mente, Tarkovski estaba totalmente loco, pero qué manera de hacer cine.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
0
BroyaxDec 31, 2021
Un film « éboulifiant » que l’on dirait tout droit sorti d’un sketch des Inconnus… sauf que ça dure une heure trois quarts, ce truc ! notons cependant que ça reste assez court tout de même, surtout venant de ce réalisateur de l’èreUn film « éboulifiant » que l’on dirait tout droit sorti d’un sketch des Inconnus… sauf que ça dure une heure trois quarts, ce truc ! notons cependant que ça reste assez court tout de même, surtout venant de ce réalisateur de l’ère soviétique, Tarkovski (qui étale ses daubes habituelles sur deux heures et demi ou trois heures), qualifié de pur génie par tous les bobos du monde entier, y compris Télérama et Positif bien évidemment.

Notons également -cependant- que ces moins de deux plombes qui tentent de nous occuper ici, durent en vérité le triple ou le qudruple en temps ressenti, voire bien plus encore… il ne s’agit pas pour autant d’un film surréaliste, il n’en a même pas l’excuse : c’est plutôt un mélange foutraque monté dans le désordre par un scénariste alcoolique.

De fait, on pige que dalle dans ce merdier sans queue ni tête et si l’actrice blonde principale est tout à fait charmante, elle ne suffit pas à nous tenir éveillé ! mais je crois en vérité que ce film (intenable) était avant tout utilisé pour faire parler les prisonniers politiques, camarades ! (ils devenaient fous ou ils tombaient dans le coma…).
Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
6
DawdlingPoetNov 27, 2021
This is a sobering watch - its quite an arty style of film, partly in black and white and the timeline seemed a little all over the place. It looked to me, visually, like something of a series of dream sequences, with library footage of warThis is a sobering watch - its quite an arty style of film, partly in black and white and the timeline seemed a little all over the place. It looked to me, visually, like something of a series of dream sequences, with library footage of war scenes and other historical events relevant to Russia in the early to mid 1900s. This film was a bit too complicated, in terms of the symbolism, the ultimate meaning of whats being said, for me to fully grasp. The dialogue seemed almost poetic at times but I couldn't quite figure out what it all amounted to somehow. It did seem somewhat poignant at times perhaps but I felt it was perhaps a little too dark and unclear for me to be especially keen on, if thats not too unfair a thing to say(?). There is definitely a sinister undercurrent present but it also is very much based on the everyday life of Russian people in the first half of the 1900s.

I wouldn't recommend this as such, no.
Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
5
mmaa_hanFeb 23, 2021
ajab film ajibi bood
pishnehad mishe hame hade aghal ye bar in filmo bebinan tarkofski man hamino azash didam vali ba sabk film sakhtanesh bayad ashna besham
mamnon
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
OlivierPielDec 31, 2022
Andrei Arsenevitch. As if Tolstoy's Prince André, looking at the sky at Austerlitz, became a real man in flesh and blood through magic and found his true artistic calling. Since Tarkovsky morphed into the tranquil, serene, slow conjurer ofAndrei Arsenevitch. As if Tolstoy's Prince André, looking at the sky at Austerlitz, became a real man in flesh and blood through magic and found his true artistic calling. Since Tarkovsky morphed into the tranquil, serene, slow conjurer of floating memories and fleeting dreams, the master of real kinematic magic. But not one who aims to fool, entertain or assuage us into infantile escapism but to elevate us, to come closer to God. Nothing less than that. In this masterpiece, each one of us can rediscover his/her mother , childhood, fears even though none of us ever lived in WWII Moscow.
We are left ingrained in our psyche this scene and that scene, that back of the head, that plucked chicken, that fire and that water that we have seen in our own way, that shared experience of the passing time, its meaning (the purpose of imperfect memories and "unreality" of dreams) and what will be left of us if don't do anything to work for the Good(this part is my two cents!).
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Amirhosein2005Feb 3, 2023
My intention is not only to review this film, but all of Tarkovsky's films. His films were extremely powerful and influential, which will remain in your mind for the rest of your life. Poetic, realistic cinematography... Tarkovsky was the oneMy intention is not only to review this film, but all of Tarkovsky's films. His films were extremely powerful and influential, which will remain in your mind for the rest of your life. Poetic, realistic cinematography... Tarkovsky was the one whose films I enjoyed and understood the true meaning of artistic cinema. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
hamidgoodarziMay 27, 2023
Creating a world full of light
"Mirror" is considered by many Tarkovsky fans and cinema experts to be his best work. But really, his works do not differ much in quality. Tarkovsky works miracles and it doesn't matter if it is in "Ivan's
Creating a world full of light
"Mirror" is considered by many Tarkovsky fans and cinema experts to be his best work. But really, his works do not differ much in quality. Tarkovsky works miracles and it doesn't matter if it is in "Ivan's Childhood" or "Mirror" or "Sacrifice". His deep understanding of cinema, music and literature has shaped his special and different atmosphere in his works. The common elements in the films with the special tone and language form the author Tarkovsky's cinema. In the mirror is the most important concept of "word" which is next to Concepts and other elements such as woman, land, human, light, war, love, mirror, sacrifice, ethics, salvation, life, etc. create a strange and mysterious combination and at the same time attractive and catchy. The title of prophet of cinema is fitting and lasting for him and spiritual cinema for his films.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews