Read User Reviews and Submit your own for Mary Poppins Returns

10

Pedrofgh2003Dec 25, 2018

It`s an incredible movie! It brings so much joy with the songs, story and acting! Emily Blunt is amazing! A sequel that honors the original!

6 of 6 users found this helpful60

All this user's reviews

9

JoshocomDec 20, 2018

My wife, my 13-year-old daughter, and I went to Mary Poppins with guarded excitement. We'd read enough reviews to be wary that this was not going to be as enchanting as the first Mary Poppins. But we were surprised -- in a very positive way.My wife, my 13-year-old daughter, and I went to Mary Poppins with guarded excitement. We'd read enough reviews to be wary that this was not going to be as enchanting as the first Mary Poppins. But we were surprised -- in a very positive way.

I'm as big a fan of the original as you'll find; it was a substantial influence on my life when it came out (I wanted to grow up to be Dick Van Dyke). So I was especially doubtful. We had purchased the soundtrack, which was released a couple of weeks before the movie, so we were already familiar with the songs -- and really found several of them to be nearly as memorable as some of the Sherman brothers' songs -- particularly "Nowhere to Go But Up" and "A Cover is Not the Book." So we already liked the music.

Well, the movie was enchanting. I sat there was a big silly grin on my face for most of it; my wife sobbed at several points, and my daughter squeezed my hand repeatedly and actually cried at the end (which is unusual for her; she tends not to lose it at emotional endings). We left singing the songs, and absolutely thrilled with Emily Blunt and Lin-Manuel Miranda. I was also incredibly impressed with the kids and with Ben Wishaw...and of course it was so uplifting to see Dick Van Dyke and Angela Lansbury still in form.

If I had one criticism, it was that the plot setup seemed rush and workmanlike. I could have stood a little more character development before the heavies moved in. But that's a small quibble in what was otherwise a transporting film that I recommend wholeheartedly, especially for families and those who can abandon their cynicism temporarily and give themselves over to the fantasy.… Expand

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

9

snafu92231Dec 21, 2018

I didn't like that gennre, but boy... this movie is full of joy, happiness with really nice production design and great costumes and good songs. I can only watched the hungarian dubbed version (even the songs were dubbed) in cinemas, but iI didn't like that gennre, but boy... this movie is full of joy, happiness with really nice production design and great costumes and good songs. I can only watched the hungarian dubbed version (even the songs were dubbed) in cinemas, but i will watch it in original language too. Blunt is superb, she will recieve that Oscar nod sure thing. I just keep smiling for 2 hours.… Expand

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

10

farfromheaven26Dec 26, 2018

Though the wholly enchanting "Mary Poppins Returns" received mostly excellent reviews as did the film's titular star Emily Blunt, what surprised me most was the terrific score by Marc Shaiman which is anything but unmemorable. "Nowhere to GoThough the wholly enchanting "Mary Poppins Returns" received mostly excellent reviews as did the film's titular star Emily Blunt, what surprised me most was the terrific score by Marc Shaiman which is anything but unmemorable. "Nowhere to Go But Up," "A Conversation," "Trip a Little Light Fantastic," "Underneath the Lonely London Sky," "The Place Where Lost Things Go,"(the film's very best song) and "Can You Imagine That?" lead a spirited, lyrically accomplished array of songs that make this homage to one of the screen's most beloved musicals in its own right an effervescent confection that also forges its own path. Splendid cameo numbers from Dick Van Dyke, Angela Lansbury and Meryl Streep add to the unbridled merriment.… Expand

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

10

iiiiJan 1, 2019

Wonderful! Just as magical as the original. Like in the 1960s, children of all ages was awed to silence, and adults were roaring with laughter. I plan to see it again! Mary Poppins has always been my favorite movie. This movie set 20+ yearsWonderful! Just as magical as the original. Like in the 1960s, children of all ages was awed to silence, and adults were roaring with laughter. I plan to see it again! Mary Poppins has always been my favorite movie. This movie set 20+ years later was true to the original storyline, but amazingly contemporary. (Lin-Manuel Miranda rapping Hamilton-style. And Dick Van Dyke dancing again!) Another Classic that will ensure for generations!… Expand

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

8

Brent_MarchantDec 31, 2018

In the interest of full disclosure, I was skeptical about this one and wasn't particularly looking forward to seeing it. I must admit, however, that I enjoyed it more than I was expecting, especially since remaking classics or creatingIn the interest of full disclosure, I was skeptical about this one and wasn't particularly looking forward to seeing it. I must admit, however, that I enjoyed it more than I was expecting, especially since remaking classics or creating sequels to them is very risky business (and something that often makes me cringe). This offering does justice to the original by not ruining its legacy, thanks to the excellent production values, fine performances and an enjoyable soundtrack that, unlike so many contemporary musicals, isn't totally forgettable. Emily Blunt pays perfect homage to the legendary character and is worthy of whatever acclaim that comes her way, and kudos are definitely due a fine cast of supporting players. The film is, unfortunately, somewhat episodic, using the narrative between musical numbers mostly as a bridge to link the songs to one another. Otherwise, though, this is a capably made and surprisingly delightful release.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

7

JLuis_001Jan 7, 2019

This is a film that can feel incredibly cheesy for the times in which we live, both real and cinematographic but I think that also gives it a fairly big merit considering that it managed to print that old Disney magic in a story that they didThis is a film that can feel incredibly cheesy for the times in which we live, both real and cinematographic but I think that also gives it a fairly big merit considering that it managed to print that old Disney magic in a story that they did not seek to update but simply resume and it works. Not like the original without a doubt, but it definitely works.

Emily Blunt's work is amazing. She's really the best of this film. The rest of the cast pales before her work even though they don't do things badly.
Lin-Manuel Miranda's inclusion doesn't work really well and his English accent is pretty bad. I don't deny that he tries but this was not the kind of film that required his talent.

I should also mention that none of the songs are memorable so that's also a negative aspect. Good songs, functional songs but hardly remarkable.

Is it worth it? Of course. Believe me, this film will hardly become a classic but at this time and with its quality it's an indisputable option.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

7

MaxPeskyJan 28, 2019

This Movie Is Just Like Original Mary Poppins But Different, The Last time I See this Movie Is I was Watching This Movie At Event Cinemas In Glendale, NSW, The Music Is Best, The Movie Was Best, And Many Things Was Best

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

7

SquaredRenJan 6, 2019

I generally don't watch this type of movies, but it was pretty fun to watch. Songs and choreography were merged pretty well with the movie plot, but I felt the movie could be a lot shorter. It felt long, and some plot points were unnecessary.I generally don't watch this type of movies, but it was pretty fun to watch. Songs and choreography were merged pretty well with the movie plot, but I felt the movie could be a lot shorter. It felt long, and some plot points were unnecessary. Overall, it's fun to watch but not cinema worthy. Wait for it to launch on Netflix.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

Dostoyevsky3May 13, 2020

Emily Blunt showcases a magnificent performance in a familiar yet fresh setting with a new direction of more delightful musical numbers and improved visuals while giving a wonderfully welcome cameo of Dick Van Dyke. Mary Poppins Returns willEmily Blunt showcases a magnificent performance in a familiar yet fresh setting with a new direction of more delightful musical numbers and improved visuals while giving a wonderfully welcome cameo of Dick Van Dyke. Mary Poppins Returns will bring back good old memories of its classic predecessor.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

nateOstrikeDec 25, 2018

I completely enjoyed this movie for what it is. It is a funfilled, wholesome movie with a nice story. The acting is great and the songs too. You can take anyone of any age to this and they will enjoy it. Well done.

5 of 6 users found this helpful51

All this user's reviews

8

moviemitch96Dec 19, 2018

Wow! What an absolute joy to watch! Of course, I love the original film, as it's such a fun and charming classic, but man, not only was this a worthy successor, but this is pretty much an instant classic in its own right as far as I'mWow! What an absolute joy to watch! Of course, I love the original film, as it's such a fun and charming classic, but man, not only was this a worthy successor, but this is pretty much an instant classic in its own right as far as I'm concerned, as it holds its own against the original effortlessly! Emily Blunt is absolutely perfect in the titular role, and without a doubt does Julie Andrews proud (she even gave Blunt her personal approval!) And for all the Hamilton fans, Lin-Manuel Miranda charms marvellously alongside Blunt. The songs are a delight, and the animation sequences that blend with the actors, much like in the first film, are all beautifully rendered. Topping all of this off are some fun little cameos in the film's final act. I will say that I was a bit disappointed that there weren't really any songs from the original (not even Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious), and I thought some renditions of at least a couple might've been fun to see. And there are some familiar and predictable tropes and moments, but when a film like this has me grinning from ear to ear for nearly the whole time, it hardly even matters! Overall, whether you've seen the original or not, you'd have to have a heart of stone not to be even remotely won over or charmed by this joy of a film, as it's an absolute delight to watch from start to finish! Simple as that!… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

8

Trineo99Dec 22, 2018

First of all, Emily Blunt's performance as Mary Poppins is excellent. She makes this famous character her own by just embodying her. She seems more like somebody who actually cares about these children. The ending shows this the best. Also inFirst of all, Emily Blunt's performance as Mary Poppins is excellent. She makes this famous character her own by just embodying her. She seems more like somebody who actually cares about these children. The ending shows this the best. Also in the song “Where the Lost Things Go” they show her caring for the children a way that the original didn’t show. I also have to applaud Lin-Manuel Miranda, who played Jack, performance in this film. You could easily tell that he was having fun with his character. I just wished we got to see his character more. I’m glad that they didn’t change the special effects in this film and kept it in the style of the 1964 one. They did put a slight modern day look to it but it was still the same style at the end of the day. Now some people say that none of the songs in this aren’t catchy and I argue over that. I would say that all but a few songs are catchy. The only non-catchy songs are the ones that are a bit slower and “Turning Turtle.” All the other songs are energetic and have great choreography to go with them. Marc Shaiman also composed the original score for this film and it’s just as magical. During the opening credits you can hear his score and in it, there are hints to the songs from the first film. The production design on each of the sets looks straight out of the first. I just wished they took a bit more care in making the house look more like the original. There are some obvious details to it that make it not look similar. For one the entryway is entirely different. They had some unique transitions between the scenes of the real world and imagination. The atmosphere in this film was excellent. In each scene, it gave off the correct type of atmosphere that you would feel in that situation. Finally, I think there were a few scenes that could have been cut out and it wouldn’t have affected the movie. Mainly because they did nothing with it later on. In the end, Mary Poppins Returns is an excellent film that is just as great as the first one.… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

10

savagelaDec 21, 2018

Delightful! Joyous! and so touching. Ben Wishaw is so ardent that he melts your heart. The kids are just right. Emily Blunt is Magical, Magical. Her voice is fantastic. The songs are hummable and memorable. I've been singing "Can You ImagineDelightful! Joyous! and so touching. Ben Wishaw is so ardent that he melts your heart. The kids are just right. Emily Blunt is Magical, Magical. Her voice is fantastic. The songs are hummable and memorable. I've been singing "Can You Imagine That," and "Nowhere to go but up" all week. The finale with the balloons surpasses the wonder of "fly a kite."… Expand

11 of 15 users found this helpful114

All this user's reviews

9

Megajohn85Dec 19, 2018

Nothing will top the first Mary Poppins. There’s no disputing that but the sequel is just as wholesome. Emily Blunt does as fantastic job as Mary Poppins which surprised me

8 of 11 users found this helpful83

All this user's reviews

9

selenatorDec 21, 2018

I hate to be cliche, but it's practically perfect in every way. Emily Blunt is tremendous - one of today's finest actresses.

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

9

bethanyrobbenDec 22, 2018

A lot of people have been saying they don't like this movie as much as the original, but I had a lot of fun watching this movie! Emily Blunt did an excellent job portraying Mary Poppins, & I loved the fun they put into the musical scenes!A lot of people have been saying they don't like this movie as much as the original, but I had a lot of fun watching this movie! Emily Blunt did an excellent job portraying Mary Poppins, & I loved the fun they put into the musical scenes! When I walked out of the movie, I had the "Can you Imagine That?" song stuck in my head for the rest of the night! Excellent sequel to the original!… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

10

Davrosdaleks1Dec 23, 2018

Mary Poppins Returns, about the titular nanny returning to help the grown up Banks children, was a true experience for me that brings back the feel of the original Mary Poppins and 60's Disney in general. (It even has a nostalgicMary Poppins Returns, about the titular nanny returning to help the grown up Banks children, was a true experience for me that brings back the feel of the original Mary Poppins and 60's Disney in general. (It even has a nostalgic old-fashioned opening credits).

The entire thing looks and feels fantastic like an old-timey storybook. Includes a new 2-D animated/live-action segment, not something we've seen in a while and a welcome comeback. The story itself has a very old-fashioned and genuinely good-hearted feel to it.

Great cast. Blunt makes and an excellent Mary Poppins, and Lin Manuel Miranda is pretty likable as Jack, Bert's replacement. Ben Wishaw (the voice of Paddinton and the most recent Q from the James Bond films) does a surprisingly sympathetic job as Michael Banks mourning the loss of his wife and just trying to keep things together.

The songs, by Marc Shaiman (Hairspray and parts of the South Park movie and Team America) aren't as catchy or memorable as the first film, but that's not knocking these songs. I did like them all and they again captured an old-school feeling.

There were some weak points. A lot of the scenes set in London, were too darkly shot for their own good. I mean I understand that an intentional style choice as the bleakness of London contrasts with the brightness Mary Poppins brings, but it makes it a pain to watch at some points.

The movie is basically like The Force Awakens as it repeats many elements from the first film. (They even bring back Admiral Boom, now played by David Warner. I mean come on he was no spring chicken in the first film. He should be dead by now.) Also, the whole mother-just-died bit was done by Disney only a month ago for the Nutcracker movie, although this movie handles it a lot better if you ask me.

Lastly, the main antagonist is paper-thin and whose crookedness exceeds practicality. This is especially disappointing as the first film didn't need this sort of villain to drive the plot.

Those criticisms aside, I had so much fun with this movie that I'm still giving it a full rating. There is nothing really objectionable in this but be forewarned younger children may be bored by the more talky moments. I saw restlessness in my nephew and other young children while watching this.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

10

markydiscoDec 24, 2018

Absolutely delightful movie! I had a smile on my face pretty much through the whole film. The music and dance numbers are top notch as well as the performances. I grew up on the original, but, I have to say this new Mary Poppins movie isAbsolutely delightful movie! I had a smile on my face pretty much through the whole film. The music and dance numbers are top notch as well as the performances. I grew up on the original, but, I have to say this new Mary Poppins movie is definitely well done. The feel good movie of the year.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

10

Lizza25Dec 24, 2018

Gorgeous family film and ms blunt is genius as poppins. The musical numbers including 2D are magical.

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

6

BeeceeDec 27, 2018

Emily Blunt does a good job of portraying Mary Poppins, and Lin-Manuel Miranda is charming. There are perhaps around three good songs. And it is a treat to see Dick Van Dyke and Angela Lansbury. However, the plot is a mess. Both the deathEmily Blunt does a good job of portraying Mary Poppins, and Lin-Manuel Miranda is charming. There are perhaps around three good songs. And it is a treat to see Dick Van Dyke and Angela Lansbury. However, the plot is a mess. Both the death of the mother and the impending home foreclosure are too much darkness to deal with. They could totally do without the foreclosure subplot, including the absurd effort to change the time on Big Ben. Colin Firth is saddled with playing a one dimensional villain.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

8

TVJerryJan 1, 2019

After 54 years, her return to the screen pretty much follows the template of the original: sweet children, withholding father, tuneful songs, eye-popping fantasies, and of course, the sassy nanny (Emily Blunt). The situations are Disney sweetAfter 54 years, her return to the screen pretty much follows the template of the original: sweet children, withholding father, tuneful songs, eye-popping fantasies, and of course, the sassy nanny (Emily Blunt). The situations are Disney sweet (even when times are down), the performers are all fine (Blunt was acceptable, but not outstanding), the flights of imagination are enjoyable and the pleasant tunes feel stylistically like the originals without being memorable. The film hits all of the right notes, just not as wonderfully as the first time. While it's not without charm and the story never lags, this follow-up doesn't possess that special magic that made the original a classic.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

3

doc2beJan 4, 2019

Aside from a likeable Emily Blunt, this movie was horrible. The last quarter was good and watchable and fun. Music was dull and not catchy. Movie lacked depth and definitely the feeling of the original. Jacks character made me squirm. SoAside from a likeable Emily Blunt, this movie was horrible. The last quarter was good and watchable and fun. Music was dull and not catchy. Movie lacked depth and definitely the feeling of the original. Jacks character made me squirm. So disappointed. Loved the scenery hovering over a London.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

MasterRileyAug 1, 2019

Mary Poppins Returns is an average movie by musical standards. It had a pretty good story and songs but it lacked anything that made it truly memorable. The songs were not all that catchy and the characters weren't that interesting.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

MarinespetsnazMar 9, 2019

I am a fan of Emily Blunt after watching her last few movies. I am still mixed feeling on this movie, but I think it was an above average movie for sure and worth a watch. I couldn't help but yell, "I'M MARRY POPPINS Y'ALL!" in the theaterI am a fan of Emily Blunt after watching her last few movies. I am still mixed feeling on this movie, but I think it was an above average movie for sure and worth a watch. I couldn't help but yell, "I'M MARRY POPPINS Y'ALL!" in the theater before the movie started.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

5

PepsiJamieFeb 26, 2019

Emily Blunt as Mary Poppins is amazing, otherwise this movie is a total waste of time. The songs aren't anything noteworthy. The character Jack seemed to only be there to remind us that Dick Van Dyke was amazing in the original. Poor JackEmily Blunt as Mary Poppins is amazing, otherwise this movie is a total waste of time. The songs aren't anything noteworthy. The character Jack seemed to only be there to remind us that Dick Van Dyke was amazing in the original. Poor Jack had nothing to contribute other than act as a counterpart for Mary. More often than not his presence is distracting.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

MarkHReviewsDec 28, 2018

“Mary Poppins Returns,” as a show, is less than the sum of its parts. But some of those parts are magnificent. First, there is the respectful homage to actors of a prior generation. Dick Van Dyke, who played Bert the Chimney Sweep in the“Mary Poppins Returns,” as a show, is less than the sum of its parts. But some of those parts are magnificent. First, there is the respectful homage to actors of a prior generation. Dick Van Dyke, who played Bert the Chimney Sweep in the original “Mary Poppins” (1964), returns in this film, even singing and dancing in a final scene, no small accomplishment at age 93. Karen Dotrice, the original Jane, has a brief cameo. Angela Lansbury, also 93, who had no association with the original film, is amazingly spry in her brief appearance as a strong-voiced Balloon Lady.

Emily Blunt, who showed off her musical theater chops as the Baker’s Wife in “Into the Woods” (2014), is luminous as Mary – the perfect blend of regal bearing, mischievousness and warmth. When Mary Poppins is in charge, this film is on strong footing. On the other hand, when Lin Manuel-Miranda (Jack the Lamplighter) is on the screen, the audience does not “look around at how lucky we are to be alive right now.” His efforts need considerably more work, work.

Director Rob Marshall previously has been quite effective in bringing Broadway musicals to the screen. “Chicago” won six Academy Awards in 2003, including Best Picture, the first musical since 1968 to win the top award. His versions of “Nine” (2009) and 2014’s “Into the Woods” also are worthy of note.

Here, Marshall receives another credit as one of three story writers. One wonders why, since the plot is almost incidental. Widower Michael Banks (Ben Whishaw, so excellent in Amazon Prime’s “A Very English Scandal” this year) has fallen on hard times. He and his family are about to be evicted from their ancestral home. If only the family can find their Certificate of Shares in the bank that holds their mortgage, all will be saved. Six-year-olds across the world have a clear sense of how this will all end. The show lurches happily along from one song opportunity to the next, sometimes with no plot development. One interesting quirk: this may be the only Disney film in history where the animated sequences are by far the least effective elements of the film.

The score by Marc Shaiman, with lyrics by Shaiman and Scott Wittman, the team behind the excellent “Hairspray” (2007), is entirely serviceable. However, it suffers in comparison to the score of the original film. “Mary Poppins” offered a series of songs known by generations - “A Spoonful of Sugar,” “Chim Chim Cheree” and “Let’s Go Fly a Kite.” In this film, the score is super-cali-fragil-never-mind. There are no soaring ballads here that you simply can’t get out of your head. In fact, given the non-existent plot, many seem entirely interchangeable.

If you need a diversion to minimize the time you have to spend during the holidays talking with family members you’ve avoided all year, this may be the show for you. Medical warning: do not take a spoonful of you-know-what before viewing. It would just be redundant.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

OdinMovieBlogMar 5, 2019

Though this film is quite delightful and good for the whole family, the visual effects of the first fantasy sequence and the borrowing from the original booka and stage musical limit this film from finding a true identity and justifying it'sThough this film is quite delightful and good for the whole family, the visual effects of the first fantasy sequence and the borrowing from the original booka and stage musical limit this film from finding a true identity and justifying it's own existence. Solid C… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

2

DerekReideMar 9, 2019

This movie firstly wasn't even needed, secondly, I cringed the whole time, and thirdly, it was just plain horrible. I only have it at one star because of the appearance of Dick Van Dyke. If he wasn't in this film, I would have given it a 0/5.This movie firstly wasn't even needed, secondly, I cringed the whole time, and thirdly, it was just plain horrible. I only have it at one star because of the appearance of Dick Van Dyke. If he wasn't in this film, I would have given it a 0/5. The plot, one dimensional, acting, meh, Meryl Streep, not needed. Everything about this movie was dreadful. I'd think if the dancing penguins made this, they would've done a much better job and getting it right!… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

TamotefuMar 12, 2019

I can't believe some people. The movie was a fantastic feel good experience, which is exactly what I want from my disney movies. Does the movie have faults? Sure. Is the plot a tight knit web of threads? No. But that's not the point, not ofI can't believe some people. The movie was a fantastic feel good experience, which is exactly what I want from my disney movies. Does the movie have faults? Sure. Is the plot a tight knit web of threads? No. But that's not the point, not of this breed of disney movie.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

Kevin3Sep 13, 2019

Nada de otro mundo es lo mismo que mary poppins original la música nueva no es pegadiza pero emily blunt hace un buen trabajo

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

PandaJackJan 1, 2020

Mary Poppins Returns is an amazing show in my video. It showed the same kind of Mary Poppins, but the original children in a different way. I love that it shows how it shows the relationship between the siblings and how Michael grew up andMary Poppins Returns is an amazing show in my video. It showed the same kind of Mary Poppins, but the original children in a different way. I love that it shows how it shows the relationship between the siblings and how Michael grew up and the struggles he goes threw which reminded me that not all shows are about someone's absolutely perfect life.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

1

LCRDec 22, 2018

Rather than bringing this classic Disney movie sequel to the here and now, the movie is an excruciating, unimaginative, dated rehash with a mess of a screenplay, forgettable, stitched together musical dance numbers and songs that don’tRather than bringing this classic Disney movie sequel to the here and now, the movie is an excruciating, unimaginative, dated rehash with a mess of a screenplay, forgettable, stitched together musical dance numbers and songs that don’t advance the story. Despite the admirable performance of Emily Blunt the movie is simply unbearable!!!!… Expand

4 of 9 users found this helpful45

All this user's reviews

3

SSH83Dec 25, 2018

Serviceable musical and "old school" visuals, but overall brainless betrayal of the original that mimics the look and sound but failed to replicate the heart and mind.

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

0

Giggles8283Mar 16, 2019

They made it like a Broadway play instead of a mary popins movie And not one single memorable song If disney was still alive he would not approve of this movie He wanted the songs to be memorable This movie didnt have any catchy songs theyThey made it like a Broadway play instead of a mary popins movie And not one single memorable song If disney was still alive he would not approve of this movie He wanted the songs to be memorable This movie didnt have any catchy songs they treated it like a Broadway play… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

3

WiscoJoeDec 22, 2018

A shovelful of Splenda makes the mediocrity go down, whether you like it or not. 'Mary Poppins Returns' is practically perfunctory in every way. Like 'The Force Awakens' and other recent products fresh off the Disney assembly line, thisA shovelful of Splenda makes the mediocrity go down, whether you like it or not. 'Mary Poppins Returns' is practically perfunctory in every way. Like 'The Force Awakens' and other recent products fresh off the Disney assembly line, this retread slavishly recreates all of the familiar parts you loved from the original, without bothering to add in the innovation, sense of wonder, and complex shades that made the original worth watching in the first place. The Disney faithful will love it as it not only preaches but panders incessantly to the choir (this time singing forgettable songs that sound like b-sides from Marc Shaiman's better, though still largely pedestrian, back catalog). For everyone else, it might be worth seeing just for the costumes and some of the choreography, otherwise just watch the first one.… Expand

2 of 6 users found this helpful24

All this user's reviews

6

BikerjamesJul 29, 2019

So is Mary Poppins Returns practically perfect in every way? Hardly. I'm a fan of Emily Blunt and she is solid in the role, although smiles a little less than Julie Andrews. The movie follows the exact same formula as the original makingSo is Mary Poppins Returns practically perfect in every way? Hardly. I'm a fan of Emily Blunt and she is solid in the role, although smiles a little less than Julie Andrews. The movie follows the exact same formula as the original making it predictable. In the first movie the kids didn't like taking their medicine so Mary came up with a way to make it enjoyable (a spoonful of sugar), in this movie it's bath time. The singing and dancing are fine throughout, but for me the weak point of the movie is the songs. I can't remember a single song after watching this movie. The songs are too wordy, not catchy. It's not a bad movie but once again it feels that Disney is simply remaking older movies because they have run out of original ideas.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

5

MattyiceDec 19, 2018

There's no doubt that I had high expectations going into this movie, considering the original Mary Poppins is one of my favorite Disney movies. While I give credit to the acting and vocals (especially by Blunt as the new Mary Poppins), asThere's no doubt that I had high expectations going into this movie, considering the original Mary Poppins is one of my favorite Disney movies. While I give credit to the acting and vocals (especially by Blunt as the new Mary Poppins), as well as art design, the film overall is a very mediocre followup. Director Rob Marshall makes what should be an awe-inspiring experience a boring one with lackluster cinematography, a retreading story, and good but forgettable songs that seem to try too hard to emulate many of the classics in the original rather than break any new ground. Overall, this is mediocre followup to a classic film and I am rather disappointed.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

2

GreatMartinDec 28, 2018

A bad sign watching a movie is thinking mostly negative thoughts and after an hour I was thinking: 1) This really isn't a movie for kids as it is too dark and somber 2) This really isn't a movie for adults as it doesn't capture what made theA bad sign watching a movie is thinking mostly negative thoughts and after an hour I was thinking: 1) This really isn't a movie for kids as it is too dark and somber 2) This really isn't a movie for adults as it doesn't capture what made the first film memorable 3) Emily Blunt has talent but she isn't a Julie Andrews or a Mary Poppins 4) Emily Mortimer has that certain smile and would make a better Mary Poppins 5) Will this film get any better? and 6) The songs are pretty lame.

There was one positive thought and that was Lin-Manual Miranda was continuing his place on the top of the hill after "In The Heights", "Hamilton", his score for "Moana", being honored on The Kennedy Center Honors this week, plus winning an Emmy Award, A Tony Award, Grammy Awards, the Pulitzer Prize, about to reprise his role as Hamilton opening the show in Puerto Rico and now doing a good job as Jack, the man who lights and shuts off the street lamps in the streets of London during the Great Slump of the 1930s. Up to the hour and a half point--no pun intended--he is the only bright light.

Julie Walker, as the housekeeper, is almost an afterthought while Colin Firth should have been given a mustache to twirl as the villain to do something with the role. As the Banks children Pixie Davies, Nathanael Saleh and Joel Dawson they are given little more than they are expected to while Emily Mortimer, as their aunt, lights up the screen here and there and Ben Whishaw, as their father, really is wooden up to and in the last half hour of the film when he really comes through in a moving scene. Oh, yes, the less said about Meryl Streep, her song and her time on the screen the better.

The last half hour in no way makes up for the first 90-95 minutes but the screen does come alive with a song and dance by 93 year-old Dick Van Dyke up on a desk, with movie magic or not, reprising "Tripping The Light Fantastic" done earlier in the film by Miranda, along with 93 year-old Angela Lansbury as the Balloon Lady singing one of the better songs from the movie, "Nowhere To Go but Up" starting a full cast number.

Lin-Manuel Miranda always talks about watching the old song and dance movies and in "Mary Poppins Returns" he has two numbers, the first being "Tripping The Light Fantastic" and the second, "Race To Big Ben", that fulfill any dreams he might have had and brings back the magic of "Mary Poppins".

"Mary Poppins Returns" offers 30 minutes of entertainment in a film that is 130 minutes long and can probably watch Lin-Manuel Miranda, Dick Van Dyke and Angela Lansbury in their show shopping numbers on youtube!… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

6

MattBrady99Dec 31, 2018

“One thing you should know about Mary Poppins: she never explains anything”.

This movie had a lot to live up with it being a sequel to a beloved classic. While I’ve seen the original movie on repeat as a child - it never had that massive“One thing you should know about Mary Poppins: she never explains anything”.

This movie had a lot to live up with it being a sequel to a beloved classic. While I’ve seen the original movie on repeat as a child - it never had that massive impact on me like everyone else, but with each re-watch I found more enjoyment and appreciation for everything that went into it.

So this being a sequel made me curious and wary; I went into this expecting nothing to avoid any disappointment. I sat down, arms crossed and waited patiently for the trailers to be over. When it started, the first 10 or 20 minutes was fine, but I was still critical. After the first musical number “Can You Imagine That?”, I started to warm up a bit and relax more.

However, halfway through the movie I noticed something about myself - there was tears streaming down my cheeks, and for a rare moment, I breathed a sigh of relief and enjoyed the ride. This is the first time in awhile I would call my experience escapism.

Emily Blunt was an absolute delight as Mary Poppins. Blunt never imitations Julie Andrews portrayal and makes the role her own. I honestly couldn’t think of anyone else to fill in the shoes of the character than Blunt. Her sassy and deadpan wit makes this super nanny pure magic.

The other cast members were also solid: Lin-Manuel Miranda delivers a theatrical performance that elevates the films charm and brought a smile to my face. Ben Whishaw, on the other hand, was so heartbreaking as the grieving Michael Banks. You can feel the pain and stress in his voice. Emily Mortimer is good as Jane Banks , but felt under-use and didn’t offer anything to the story.

Also Dick Van Dyke dance scene, while short, was unbelievable. He’s got more energy than any wanna be dancer, and he’s 93 years old.

Rob Marshall gives the movie a Broadway-like touch similar to his previous work. The musical sequences with songs like “Nowhere to Go But Up” and "Can You Imagine That?" being colorful and a blast to watch, which adds to the escapism. The production design and choreography - mwah. He also tackles the more serious elements where the emotions from the characters are expressed through songs and the performances.

For issues: The songs themselves while fun, yet not super memorable and doesn't hold a candle to the 1965 film. After the movie was over, the songs didn't stick with me as I hoped. This might change over time.

The main villain played by Colin Firth is so cliched and cartoonist. I started to question why a movie like this needs a bad-guy - although I guess the climax needed to be more intense. He's even got a twirling mustache. When the character first appears on screen, I knew straight away there was something unpleasant about him and the foreshadowing involving an animated sequence was so painfully obvious. His character could have be great if it was written better.

Meryl Streep short appearance is so pointless and could've easily been cut out from the final daft. I wasn't sure what accent she was going for.

Overall rating: It's not flawless, yet it wasn't an abomination like some expected it to be. I would go as far to call it a satisfying sequel.

Perhaps we've learned when day is done, some stuff and nonsense could be fun.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

3

ohsiyoDec 28, 2018

Saw the movie with my family who liked it, but was an endurance test for me. "Mary Poppins Returns" was completely derivative of the classic, but failed in almost every regard. Couldn't they have developed an original idea or story? The songsSaw the movie with my family who liked it, but was an endurance test for me. "Mary Poppins Returns" was completely derivative of the classic, but failed in almost every regard. Couldn't they have developed an original idea or story? The songs were out of your typical modern Broadway musical, bland and forgettable--nothing like the original. Emily Blunt is a good actress, but too "hard" as Mary Poppins for my taste. I think Lin-Manuel Miranda and Ben Whishaw were just miscast. Miranda tries too hard to be Dick Van Dyke and Whishaw as Michael Banks is an unsympathetic nebbish. I gave the movie 3 stars for the production values, but otherwise found the movie to be a pathetic imitation of the original classic.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

3

RayNewnanDec 24, 2018

MP was a tough one to seat through, 3 hours at the theater,
every song sucked and adults and kids restless.

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

3

Faisal5417Dec 22, 2018

This film just does not live up to what the critics have been saying. Disappointing.

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

5

rlindauDec 29, 2018

Blah. It was mildly entertaining, but the plot, songs, and dances are all quite forgettable.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

TyranianApr 23, 2019

Basically a copy-paste of original film with great visuals but bundles of PC nonsense.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

dharmaApr 13, 2019

Disney seems to rely more and more on their subsidiary studios for both originality and box office returns, as this so called sequel is one of the most disappointing film of 2018. This flick suffers the exact same problem that SoloDisney seems to rely more and more on their subsidiary studios for both originality and box office returns, as this so called sequel is one of the most disappointing film of 2018. This flick suffers the exact same problem that Solo experiences the year before. For one, Emily Blunt, as good as she is, can't compare with Julie Andrews. Sure she tried to make the role her own...but she does not have the charisma to pull that role off. Also, the musical numbers...completely forgettable. Lin Manuel Miranda tried his best, but failed to replicate the amazing musical numbers of the past.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

Compi24Jan 8, 2019

Acclaimed musical director Rob Marshall employs his "Into The Woods" collaborator Emily Blunt to revisit a classic. Somehow the resulting product, "Mary Poppins Returns," ends up simultaneously being one of the most unnecessary and uninspiredAcclaimed musical director Rob Marshall employs his "Into The Woods" collaborator Emily Blunt to revisit a classic. Somehow the resulting product, "Mary Poppins Returns," ends up simultaneously being one of the most unnecessary and uninspired sequels I've ever seen, yet still a watchable one. A film where its circumstances and central conceits are ultimately more dire than its predecessor's, there's almost nothing about its musical aspects that's worthy of screentime. The musical numbers only serve to distract the main characters from the central conflict of the film. Mary Poppins as a character is borderline inconsequential to the course of events and the songs themselves are almost entirely unremarkable. Still, as someone who's not necessarily a "Poppins" purist, it doesn't bother me all that much. It's just a harmless, silly, disposable junk food film. Don't expect much more than that.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

6

Voodoo123Sep 22, 2019

I enjoyed watching this musical - you can tell it was made by fans of the original and great care is taken to tick certain boxes that a fan would expect to see.... sadly the result is somewhat dry in execution with little in the way ofI enjoyed watching this musical - you can tell it was made by fans of the original and great care is taken to tick certain boxes that a fan would expect to see.... sadly the result is somewhat dry in execution with little in the way of memorable songs (exception for me was everything goes turtle!), and the project overall felt more iteration than innovation telling a long drawn out predictable tale with an odd cast of individuals that never quite had a group chemistry I could gel with... That said, if you're a hardcore fan of the original, there could be something here for you and it was made with the kind of calculated love we have grown to expect from the age of Disney's 'reboots & awkwardly late sequels'.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

AxeTDec 30, 2018

Technically well done, good casting of a fine Emily Blunt and a competent but entirely interchangeable Lin-Manuel Miranda it's nothing new, nothing special and nothing riveting to behold unlike the groundbreaking Disney classic from theTechnically well done, good casting of a fine Emily Blunt and a competent but entirely interchangeable Lin-Manuel Miranda it's nothing new, nothing special and nothing riveting to behold unlike the groundbreaking Disney classic from the sixties was at the time.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

NETMUSICJan 11, 2019

Emily Blunt is clearly the best thing in this movie, which itself is a fun ride for families with younger children. However, Lin-Manuel Miranda is not very good and brings the movie down the entire time.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

2

TrevorsViewJan 19, 2019

In light of new year’s resolutions, we together should go back to when the impossible became possible, way back when Jesus walked earth (ahem, water) to prove himself as God’s son by breaking the laws of physics and the Pentateuch. As anIn light of new year’s resolutions, we together should go back to when the impossible became possible, way back when Jesus walked earth (ahem, water) to prove himself as God’s son by breaking the laws of physics and the Pentateuch. As an attempt of recreating that, for temporary entertainment, Disney revisits P.L. Travers’ Jesus figure she brought to humanity. The big Mouse House still hasn’t quite mastered how to produce live action feature films, meaning Mary Poppins Returns deserves no spot inside anyone’s wine cellar due to its absence of a story in order to showcase bad lip syncing, as well as other horrors of cinematic musicals.

The elements of this reality center around Michael, now a grown up widower with three children, who must pay off a loan or else lose his father’s home. It’s not at all worth caring for, since this potential homeless life leaves the three children unphased; I doubt they’d even run in fear from the Return to Oz wheelers—they’re that dull. That reality tries to combine with the whimsy too grounded in smelly parts of below to be funny, particularly when it comes to the bits with Admiral Boom. Then after two hours of hearing Lin-Manuel Miranda’s fake accent that sounds worse than Dick’s, the end takes on a thriller vibe driven by Colin Firth, an evil villain with a Cruella Deville cackle.

That’s why Mary Poppins returns, to help the family through something they easily could solve on their own. Rather, her only purpose is to teach kids dangerous games in a bathtub that for sure would cause death by drowning from toddlers who watch that scene and want to imitate it. The three offspring of Michael are in fact the ones who save the day for the grown-ups, something that would make parents watching roll their eyes; for any youngster that smart may as well crank their heads a full three-sixty then vomit pea soup. Except you won’t hear yourself shout, “the power of Christ compels you,” since the stereo blasts much louder than your own thoughts! While my mom and I were watching this, she had to cover her ears, and I wanted to, not just to block out the painful stereo, but because Michael sings worse than the witches of Hocus Pocus, making every one of his scenes that much more painful!

Although the good tunes try their best to remedy the pain, right from the exciting overture heard behind a series of rough London paintings. Marc Shaiman (The American President) heals the senses as his melody generates the spectacular tune of everyone fitting on a single bike, or even when the home of Mary’s cousin Topsy turns upside down. While many songs are bland, “Trip a Little Light Fantastic” manages to reach improbable levels of fun, relative to the rest of the film that is, although not like the legendary tunes of the original. Although not as strong, Emily Blunt does her best to capture the pacing of Julie Andrews’ iconic role by continually denying the adventures she has with the kids.

Those details leave relatively miniscule scars—all else penetrates pretty deep. Mary succumbs dancers less organized than the hysterical housemaid of the original movie, and with a sense of chaos that feels like life flashing before the eyes. A vertigo camera effect used at one brief point in the horrific climax means Cherry Tree Lane looking better than before matters none; the attempts to spark nostalgia fail from certain abuse of modern filming techniques.

Another huge reason for that disloyalty to the source material comes from the casting: Meryl Streep’s obnoxious accent literally seems unsure about which side of fantasy to express, she resorts to the anti-fantasy of a surfaced trout‘s blub-blub-blub. But the biggest reason for the disloyalty lands on the screenplay; nothing that ever happens, not even a china bowl adventure where a wolf steals one of the boys‘ stuffed giraffe, inflicts change on anybody or anything. After all the chaos happens, a deus ex machina renders everything throughout the entire film pointless… and just to make room for a High School Musical type of ending that teaches young innocent minds to stay self-indulgent on their dreams.

Really, what’s the point of these excessive musical numbers if they’re just going to be as obnoxious as a Cheetah Girl concert? There’s even a cabaret number to divert the familiar old Mary Poppins essence, hence why the people responsible behind this sequel forgot why the original became a classic. Highly doubtful they even care about the earliest memories of so many who grew up with Mary Poppins.

I as one came to love the original Mary Poppins over time due to its profound themes of a family’s interpersonal distance. Ignore the way Mary Poppins Returns has made P.L. Travers roll over in her grave. Look instead toward a man who walked on the sea, died, came back, and flew to heaven; that gives rewards beyond diving into a soapy tub.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

6

VirgonoShakaJan 7, 2019

I wasn't sure what to expect from this. On one hand, I love the original, on the other, Sequels (especially decade long afterwards) can be pretty bad, but I went with an open mind and knowing I am weak towards musicals. The end result is...I wasn't sure what to expect from this. On one hand, I love the original, on the other, Sequels (especially decade long afterwards) can be pretty bad, but I went with an open mind and knowing I am weak towards musicals. The end result is... OK. Practically a rehash of the original, and too much of a safe movie, I can say that at least the production is good and the music (at least for the most part) is nice and catchy with Lin Manuel Miranda doing a bang up job. But other than that, it is nothing that special. Unless taking your children or a big fan, I would not be able to recommend.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

2

DominArsenOct 27, 2019

I am without answer. The film is not bad. It just does not make me dream. It's the same as Dumbo. I am amazed the quality Disney is tearing itself apart.

Je suis sans réponse. Le film n'est pas mauvais. Il ne me fait simplement pas rêver.I am without answer. The film is not bad. It just does not make me dream. It's the same as Dumbo. I am amazed the quality Disney is tearing itself apart.

Je suis sans réponse. Le film n'est pas mauvais. Il ne me fait simplement pas rêver. C'est pareil que Dumbo. Je suis étonné la qualité Disney se déchire.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

MrMangaJan 18, 2021

Its one of the better new Disney movies, it can be a little to sugar sweet, they try a little to hard wich make things sometimes feel a bit "forced" and few songs are as memorable as in the original but in general a nice movie :)

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

brach311Dec 31, 2018

Emily Blunt is a credible MP and visually the movie is reminiscent of the original, but it ends there. The songs are neither cute nor fun to listen to. The dancinging is OK but neither Fred nor Gene would be singing their praises. TheEmily Blunt is a credible MP and visually the movie is reminiscent of the original, but it ends there. The songs are neither cute nor fun to listen to. The dancinging is OK but neither Fred nor Gene would be singing their praises. The story is hackneyed and transparent. So what's left? The kids in the audience tell that part of this story. During the interminable trailers before the movie there were laughs and giggles from the children during a few. There were none during MPR. Afterwards the five of us who saw the show together looked at each other and wondered why we'd bothered.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

NolanLundgaardJan 16, 2019

Anyone who knows me knows that I love the original Mary Poppins movie from 58 years ago. As this is the case, anyone can guess how excited I was to see this sequel for the first, which I totally was. It started off with an original musicAnyone who knows me knows that I love the original Mary Poppins movie from 58 years ago. As this is the case, anyone can guess how excited I was to see this sequel for the first, which I totally was. It started off with an original music number, which made me super excited for the rest of the film. Unfortunately, however, as the film progressed, the more disappointed I became. The special effects were exactly what I expected for a Mary Poppins movie with roughly 60 years of improved technology: nothing short of amazing. There were two scenes that were the pinnacle of the disappointment. The main offense was the “cover is not the book” scene. The song was not what I expected from a Mary Poppins film (although the Hamilton-style Lin Manuel Miranda solo was awesome) and it felt like they were making fun of the animated penguins (which were one of my favorite things about the original). On the other hand, I enjoyed the old-school-style animation of that scene. The other misfire was the Topsy number. It felt out of place and you can’t ruin any character, let alone Mary Poppins, by telling everyone that that character has such a creepo for a cousin. That being said, the bank taking property is, in my opinion, an overused conflict, however I liked how the banker was actually evil, along with the Dick Van Dyke cameo. This brings me to my next point: Lin-Manuel Miranda, though I love his Hamilton and In the Heights productions, was no Bert-substitute. And the Michael actor didn’t look like the kid in the original, but besides that, the casting was well done. Though Mary Poppins Returns was a bit underwhelming, it was still an enjoyable experience—at the times that didn’t fall flat.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

CharleyNewmanFeb 6, 2019

Bwugh. What a chore to sit through. Full disclosure: not really a fan of the original either. But at least the original had, you know, some originality. This is an incredibly dull, trite film that had me bored to tears. The musical choicesBwugh. What a chore to sit through. Full disclosure: not really a fan of the original either. But at least the original had, you know, some originality. This is an incredibly dull, trite film that had me bored to tears. The musical choices were awful, the plot was tedious and predictable. Just a very poor film. Couldn't they have tried to jazz it up a little. Eight seconds of ONE song, rapped by Lin Manuel Miranda almost had me perk up. At least the animation sequence of the movie was kind of nice; also nice to have a bit of a return to 2D animation. Blunt and Whishaw are fine, but I expect better of them. What a disappointment, even for someone who had low expectations going in.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

LegendaryLassDec 29, 2018

When the world needed it the most, Disney and director Rob Marshall gave us a true gem: an actual movie musical. Like the recent Star Wars reboots, Mary Poppins Returns mixes nostalgia with a fresh perspective and organic growth and providesWhen the world needed it the most, Disney and director Rob Marshall gave us a true gem: an actual movie musical. Like the recent Star Wars reboots, Mary Poppins Returns mixes nostalgia with a fresh perspective and organic growth and provides some truly spectacular musical numbers. You will be humming these tunes on the way to the car and for years to come.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

6

BulgarianCriticApr 20, 2019

A pretty decent comeback of the beloved Mary Poppins with some really nice songs

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

SquiggsDec 31, 2018

Good movie, nice attempt at following up on an all time classic. Big big shoes to fill. Not bad on all fronts
But my problem is a big one, it's with Mary Poppins. Emily Blunt makes Mary her own with enough nods to the original, but this MaryGood movie, nice attempt at following up on an all time classic. Big big shoes to fill. Not bad on all fronts
But my problem is a big one, it's with Mary Poppins. Emily Blunt makes Mary her own with enough nods to the original, but this Mary Poppins is a cold version that lacks the warmth of the original. The motherly warm touch that made us all fall in love with the movie is missing. Mary lacked personality, other than being prim and proper. I mean, please crack a genuine smile and show some bloody empathy once in a while. If you make a "returns" movie, you should have a continuation of the beloved character traits in the original. Otherwise, don't do it at all. Lin-Manuel Miranda shines as the star in this one, he's the most memorable character and whether that's a good or bad thing, I'll let you decide. But not a bad movie! Great singing, dancing and choreography. Worth the watch and a genuine attempt from all cast members.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

JeffB4125Dec 31, 2018

They aren't reinventing the wheel here, but if you liked the original and wished it could be updated with today's technology, here you go

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

thegirlwhoknowsJan 2, 2019

Although this movie contains a couple special moments, over all it is nothing but lazy writing and unimaginative storyline. Disney of late seems to use the same scheme of throwing as many popular actors into a movie as possible and let itAlthough this movie contains a couple special moments, over all it is nothing but lazy writing and unimaginative storyline. Disney of late seems to use the same scheme of throwing as many popular actors into a movie as possible and let it come together in a mad jumble. Magic takes a lot more careful work. Shame on them for riding on the backs of the genius of P.L. Travers and Walt Disney and his team.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

Eaj6Oct 8, 2019

As the old saying goes "Everything old is new again." With this movie, I believe (reluctantly) that the original movie is better. The cast and attempt to replicate a classic film were deemed horrible. The music just wasn't the same because,As the old saying goes "Everything old is new again." With this movie, I believe (reluctantly) that the original movie is better. The cast and attempt to replicate a classic film were deemed horrible. The music just wasn't the same because, heck, you don't have the Sherman Brothers composing it. Also, there were no animals and whimsical imagination that the original move possesed. However, I have rated it 2 stars because of Dick Van Dyke's cameo.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

MasadaSep 23, 2019

Raises nostalgia, wonderfully animated part, made me smile and laugh. Horribly cut around including an actor for 2 minutes. Didn't like the deus ex Mary Poppins. It doesn't fit her. Besides that, a wonderful movie for children to look at withRaises nostalgia, wonderfully animated part, made me smile and laugh. Horribly cut around including an actor for 2 minutes. Didn't like the deus ex Mary Poppins. It doesn't fit her. Besides that, a wonderful movie for children to look at with wonder, just like I did with the original.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

2

hnestlyontheslyOct 7, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. As far as I can tell, Mary Poppins Returns is the story of an upper class family that has fallen onto temporarily hard times yet can still afford a full-time nanny and a housekeeper. After her first chore of giving the three appropriately woke children baths, it’s easy to see why the myth of Mary Poppins is the wet dream of dads everywhere and a very big **** you to all moms. Emily Blunt does a lovely job being mean and contrary whenever possible, even spinning some dark moments into her performance at the end of “The Place Where Lost Things Go” and the look into the red balloon mirror during “Nowhere to Go But Up,” as she says, “practically perfect,” either referring to herself or the family she is about to leave.

My favorite songs are the one for adults, done in perfect burlesque fashion, “A Cover is Not the Book,” and “Turning Turtle,” because one of the actors sings the entire thing in an amazing Eastern European accent.

Wife called the film “soulless,” “a robot movie that looked the way a movie is supposed to look but with nothing underneath,” I think, because she thought that it was over-long, lacked essential truths like “A Spoonful of Sugar,” and felt like an only “loosely collected assortment of songs”. Mom said it felt like “watching a K-Drama” in the way its ending abruptly arrived. Wife says by making the stakes so high, the writers kind of ensured that the film would work out, because we knew deep down that no one was going to make those kids sleep in the street.

I said that I thought the bit in the beginning when, in an homage to the original, the kids and Mary Poppins are transported into a cartoon world would either mark the film as visually audacious or send it straight to the made-for-television category of children’s films and my dad said, “It looked exactly like it had been made in the original.” “Better?” I asked. “The same,” he said, which feels like it’s probably not a good thing.

These people wanted to see Mary Poppins in the first place, but they were so turned off by the sheer volume of half-baked songs and the uncanny valley of rudderless morality that is Disney’s sequel machine that they were coaxed into mild annoyance. My feeling is that your kids probably won’t know any better, so if you’re into it, go see it, but if you’d rather see literally anything else, they won’t be able to tell the difference anyway.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

OrijantmapleSep 29, 2021

Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good Good!

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

10

BANNEDGGlndccntJan 31, 2022

GOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOOD GOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOODGOOD good

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

survivorfan989Jan 1, 2019

Solid sequel that has managed to capture the exact same magic that the original film did.