Sony Pictures Classics | Release Date: September 29, 2017
5.5
USER SCORE
Mixed or average reviews based on 34 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
11
Mixed:
18
Negative:
5
Watch Now
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
5
eagleeyevikingDec 28, 2017
There is simply no momentum in the film. The story is fascinating and the acting is fine, but it could have been more tight, personal, and riveting.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
5
FedorkoNov 14, 2017
What a letdown - Liam Neeson in a more meaty role than usual. His one note acting really disappointed. Direction lacked dimension, the story was predictable. The script and director had a good message, but they didn't land it well becauseWhat a letdown - Liam Neeson in a more meaty role than usual. His one note acting really disappointed. Direction lacked dimension, the story was predictable. The script and director had a good message, but they didn't land it well because everything else in the film was lackluster. The most middle of the road movie you'll see this year. Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
6
tropicAcesMay 5, 2018
Never as thrilling as it could be, nor as snappy as THE POST, it still has an interesting insight into the power of Hoover’s FBI and the extent of the Watergate coverup.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
JLuis_001Jan 2, 2018
Taking into account the theme, its subject and the general environment of the story I can say that that is the most relevant stuff about it but the film itself doesn't really offer substance or something more attractive.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
imthenoobFeb 20, 2018
Neeson is very one dimensional in this film and lacks the kind of lustre that someone portraying the role of Mark Felt should have. I can't help but think this movie would have been better with someone as in the role. Not to say that NeesonNeeson is very one dimensional in this film and lacks the kind of lustre that someone portraying the role of Mark Felt should have. I can't help but think this movie would have been better with someone as in the role. Not to say that Neeson can't act but I feel that his talents have dumbed down a bit because he's been in mediocre comedies and action films for the last several years. He hasn't done a serious drama in a long time and it shows.

Now as for the movie, It's not bad. They do a good job explaining things for those that aren't as informed about Watergate as others but I don't think it'll offer anything new other than a nice dramatization of events for those very familiar with the scandal. It's not a bad movie at all, It's certainly watchable but I think it could have been better.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
RalfbergsNov 26, 2020
While this is an important story and person in US history and he should be remembered and his story told, I just dont see it being made in a movie - the movie ended up being very slow paced and boring and really not that entertaining. LiamWhile this is an important story and person in US history and he should be remembered and his story told, I just dont see it being made in a movie - the movie ended up being very slow paced and boring and really not that entertaining. Liam Neeson was good and I managed to watch it all, only because of it I give it a 4. I mean acting and story is all ok, but it feels just boring when watching it Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
CoKronakanOct 20, 2018
In short: it's a chore of a movie. It just doesn't feel to have the tension that Mark Felt had, and it's not immersive at all. Not even to mention the fact that the movie is not fun what so ever, and most importantly not entertaining. It's aIn short: it's a chore of a movie. It just doesn't feel to have the tension that Mark Felt had, and it's not immersive at all. Not even to mention the fact that the movie is not fun what so ever, and most importantly not entertaining. It's a serious movie and does that well, and pretty much this is the only thing that it's done great in this title. The acting and the script was all right, but could have been so much better. Still the cinematography was amazing, and very clever. But the plot it's not interesting enough for general audience. More over it's hard to understand it all, if you don't have the necessary background. Overall it's a slightly above average movie, because there are a couple of things that where done great, but the rest just lacking immensely. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews