Man of Steel

5

dislexicpotatoApr 14, 2019

God this film dragged on, with an unlikeable protagonist and action sequences that are just absurd, the film takes the term unrealistic to a level that is just laughable.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

BrunoVn00Apr 7, 2019

This is a really boring movie with a TERRIBLE pacing. Now, this isn't like the worst thing ever, but this is so disappointing. The dark and realistic tone that the director tried to give to this movie just doesn't work for Superman, well,This is a really boring movie with a TERRIBLE pacing. Now, this isn't like the worst thing ever, but this is so disappointing. The dark and realistic tone that the director tried to give to this movie just doesn't work for Superman, well, MAYBE it could've worked if they made it good. This movie misses the point to its source material worse than The Amazing Spider-Man did, it's an insult what they made with Superman with this. Superman was always the symbol of hope and justice, but this movie portrays him as the symbol of destruction, with boring character development. Making a character not crack any joke or smile a little bit, doesn't make it "realistic", it's just bad character development and even lazy, because a talentless writer would think "Oh how do I make my character realistic, oh, I will make him serious and angry-looking".

The story had a lot of potential, the story ON PAPER is actually really good, I mean it was written by the talented Christopher Nolan, and maybe if he actually directed the movie and wrote the script, this could've turned out to be good, but no, that didn't happen.

The first two acts are boring and have almost nothing interesting happening, all the acting is bland and so melodramatic, but then we get to the third act and it turns into a dumb action shlock. This is why this movie has an inconsistent tone: The first two acts are presented as a drama and then the third act is just loud action and believe it or not, I actually liked the last scene, the fight between Superman and Zod, but it doesn't fit with the movie that was presented to the audience in the first place.

Overall, what a pretty bad start for the DCEU, it's not the worst superhero movie, not even the worst DC movie ever, but it's honestly the worst Superman movie.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

Connorcox1997Mar 23, 2019

Man of Steel is a dope movie. Henry Cavill as awesome as Superman. Easily the best Superman Movie to date. I Highly recommended.

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

10

celtagalacticoMar 12, 2019

The best Superman movie, amazing soundtrack and villain is so good.

Totally recommended to watch.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

Player2-WaterDec 29, 2018

E-Value: 7
Acting: 8
Plot: 7 Seven years have passed since DC Comics’ famous and iconic superhero, Superman, was last seen on the big screen with the release of 2006’s Superman Returns starring Brandon Routh. After a long hiatus, he hasE-Value: 7
Acting: 8
Plot: 7

Seven years have passed since DC Comics’ famous and iconic superhero, Superman, was last seen on the big screen with the release of 2006’s Superman Returns starring Brandon Routh. After a long hiatus, he has finally return to the big screen with a reboot and unconnected to the previous Superman movies. This movie features the origin story of Superman and is the first instalment in the shared movie universe unofficially known as DC Extended Universe.

In the final hours of Krypton before its destruction due to destabilisation from the mining of the planet core, chief advisor to Krypton’s supreme council, Jor-El, steals the genetics codex and infuses them into the DNA of Jor-El’s new-born son, Kal-El. While this is happening, General Zod (Shannon) and his loyalist attempts a coup against the supreme council and killed Jor-El to retrieve the stolen codex. Despite Zod’s rebellion was stop and sentence to the imprisonment in the Phantom Zone, Krypton explodes after that.

Years after arrived on Earth, Kal-El is adopted by Jonathan and Martha Kent, whom they named him Clark Kent (Cavill). Clark has faced difficulties in his childhood due to his special abilities. During his adulthood, he goes on a journey for years and found an ancient Kryptonian scout ship where he finally learnt everything he needs to know from the hologram of his late biological father. Daily Planet journalist, Lois Lane (Adams), who has been investigating the ancient scout ship for some stories, is saved by Clark after she accidently triggers the ship’s security system.

After that, he dons a Kryptonian suit with the symbol of his birth family. Finally embracing his alien heritage, he becomes humanity’s hope and inspiration. Meanwhile, General Zod, who have been freed from the Phantom Zone after the destruction of Krypton many years ago, have finally discovers Clark’s location due to the reactivation of the same ancient scout ship.

In comparison between the late Christopher Reeves and Henry Cavill, both of them are great and there is no clear winner. Reeves’ version is more light-hearted and campy which is suited in the old days while Cavill’s version is more serious-orientated and realistic which more suited for the modern day era. Even Michael Shannon’s take on General Zod is totally amazing and definitely one of the best comic book villain in the big screen.

The music in this movie is totally awesome especially during the fight scenes between Superman and the villains. The combination between the music and the fights scenes creates a huge hype up and very exciting. Two thumbs up to Hans Zimmer, whose music has never ceased to impress me. As for the plot, it was good start up for an origins story.

On the downside, Superman got too much character development at the cost of supporting characters in the movie getting less character development which makes it less interesting for them to be care about. The movie also lacked some sense of humours and comedy relief moments. Nevertheless, the movie is still fun to watch. I am looking forward towards the next instalment.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

AvengersIWDec 24, 2018

I am just going to start with the negatives and get those out of the way. While I liked what they were going for with the tone and storyline, I think the latter was very badly executed. The Story starts off in Krypton. The first problem isI am just going to start with the negatives and get those out of the way. While I liked what they were going for with the tone and storyline, I think the latter was very badly executed. The Story starts off in Krypton. The first problem is that we spend way too much time here some 15-20 mins that we probably could forget what we are really watching. Not only that but it is very confusing what is going on (maybe its just me) and the dialogue doesn't help out. We cut to earth and the movie randomly cuts to flashbacks and it's confusing. So I think they made an interesting Clark Kent character, it took way too long for the actual plot to kick in. At the 1.5 points, the Kryptonians invade earth. My problem with this is that it is pretty much an entire hour of nonstop action and a ton of collateral damage. Invincible characters keep punching each other can be fun for the first 5 mins but can get very exhausting for an hour. Collateral damage is stupid, Superman ends up killing millions perhaps. He could have noticed that punching a Kryptonian through buildings isn't helping but is hurting instead. So I finally think that the story is poorly structured, it wastes time, not put together very well, and the plot kicks in very late and further on when it does it becomes an hour long of invincible people punching each other over and over again. Shaky Cam was annoying for me and i dont see anyone else complaining. The shaky cam made this a chore for me to get through. Now on to the good parts, the tone i think is really good a least to me. Zod was a servicible villain and the movie had its momments here in there. But i think what hurt this movie movie for me was that it was boring. How could a superhero movie in the 2010s be boring? Overall, messy plot but great idea, the cg is alright, acting solid, action good but way too much of it, superman was done right though.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

miltondanjoelDec 22, 2018

SIN DUDAS LA MEJOR PELÍCULA DE SUPERMAN, EXCELENTE BANDA SONORA, EXCELENTES ARMADURAS, EXCELENTES EFECTOS. ME PARECIÓ UNA PELÍCULA PERFECTA DEL HOMBRE DE ACERO

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

ARGzelderDec 17, 2018

Esta moderna adaptación de Superman es bastante interesante, peca de querer emular la estructura narrativa de la trilogía de Batman de Nolan, y la tonalidad oscura. Pero se las arregla para ser su propia historia, con grandes escenas SCi-Fi yEsta moderna adaptación de Superman es bastante interesante, peca de querer emular la estructura narrativa de la trilogía de Batman de Nolan, y la tonalidad oscura. Pero se las arregla para ser su propia historia, con grandes escenas SCi-Fi y batallas enérgicas a la altura del personaje.
La historia del origen es bastante densa, el cambio constante en la línea del tiempo desorienta, aunque lo visual esta bien logrado, es atractivas a la vista, como aquella en el aula de clases donde un jóven Clark comienza a descubrir sus poderes de rayos X y su superoído.
La acción es el gran punto fuerte de "Man of Steel", ver a los héroes volando y golpeándose con fuerza sobrehumana es increíble. Aunque los villanos son algo genéricos, ya que salvo Zod que tiene una actuación bastante exagerada los demás enemigos carecen de personalidad.
En conclusión ésta nueva entrega de Superman por Snyder es una película fascinante, ver esta versión más compleja del héroe descubriendo quién es, luchando y descubirendo sus capacidades es fresco pero hay decisiones que no se sienten propias del personaje. Visualmente esta recreación sobresale, pero necesita de contenido que la haga una experiencia satisfactoria completa.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

d0vla11Dec 16, 2018

I got to admit, i've never liked Superman as a character. But, BUT when i saw this movie in cinema, my opinion had totally changed. Henry Cavill nailed it as Clark. Movie has a solid story and awesome OST.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

KanjiDec 10, 2018

Certainly a slow burner, but oddly satisfying and ultimately fulfilling its purpose. Man of Steel pulls the curtains on who Superman really is and his origin. It’s not without its contrived moments and occasional slogs but it made me learn aCertainly a slow burner, but oddly satisfying and ultimately fulfilling its purpose. Man of Steel pulls the curtains on who Superman really is and his origin. It’s not without its contrived moments and occasional slogs but it made me learn a lot about the hugely renowned hero; the film truly explodes into life later on with some fantastic visuals and lovely action. Henry Cavill is the perfect actor to play as Superman, he fits into the role seamlessly and looks the part. The rest of the cast are not without compliments either, there is good character development everywhere and it makes it that much more wholesome and rewarding. Solid film in my books.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

Detento4587Nov 27, 2018

Note:8.2
Man Of Steel is undoubtedly the most realistic movie about heroes based on comics, it shows more or less how it would be if a Super Human existed, the dialogues and flashbacks are of crying so beautiful that it is, it portrays wellNote:8.2
Man Of Steel is undoubtedly the most realistic movie about heroes based on comics, it shows more or less how it would be if a Super Human existed, the dialogues and flashbacks are of crying so beautiful that it is, it portrays well the HQ The Last Days Of Krypton and the fights are sensational,but two problems that bothered me was Lois Lane (SHE IS EVERYWHERE IN THE MOVIE) and some problems with the script during the fight against Zod, because Superman destroyed the whole city without thinking about the people, and in the end he wants to save they ... but that does not detract from the film's brilliance.
Man Of Steel is a great movie with thoughtful thoughts around the film.… Expand

4 of 4 users found this helpful40

All this user's reviews

10

Kirollos-NoahNov 29, 2018

First DCEU movie wasn't disappointing at all, as some people say. For me, this movie has everything anyone wants in any movie.

The action sequences mixed with a great CGI, with one of the greatest soundtracks of all the time, and for sure, aFirst DCEU movie wasn't disappointing at all, as some people say. For me, this movie has everything anyone wants in any movie.

The action sequences mixed with a great CGI, with one of the greatest soundtracks of all the time, and for sure, a great reason for everything, and that creates a spectacular story! With a great performances! Well, that what I meant to say by saying "this movie has everything anyone wants in any movie".

I guess I said all I want to say..… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

amehannaNov 20, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Unlike most accounts, excluding the WB television series SMALLVILLE, when we first meet Clark Kent in MAN OF STEEL, he is kind of lost, trying to find his place but feeling very out of place, which is something we've all felt at some point in our lives – immediately making Clark the most lifelike he’s ever been.

The path that Clark is on here is a heavily emotional one, and more importantly about the consequences that arise from the choices that life forces you to make.

Throughout his journey in MAN OF STEEL, Clark has to reconcile the teachings from his Kryptonian father, Jor-El, and Jonathan Kent, his father from Earth, if he is to become the man that, arguably, both fathers would want him to be, in their own ways, ultimately having to find acceptance and come to terms with who he is.

This is not the colorful Superman tale of old that flies with the swelling orchestral music of John Williams, this is a more relatable figure who deals with very human issues of love, divided loyalties and family, even as he is anything but human himself.

From the vital flashbacks that take the audience across Clark’s childhood, teen years, and post high-school years, to the very controversial yet powerful scene where Superman kills Zod, every moment within this film is a fragment of the puzzle that is Clark trying to understand himself.

All these themes stand-out more powerfully than they did before – and the violence that is spread out throughout the film becomes the least exciting.

Cinematographically, Snyder opts for a handheld feel throughout the film where the camera zooms in harshly during the action-packed moments – a journalist filming the action as it happens – and softer hand-held scenes during the more intimate moments – a family member filming for a home video.

With that in mind, the film has some breathtaking visual moments.

The film is quite CGI heavy, but what super-hero film isn’t nowadays? At least the CGI in MAN OF STEEL has purpose and doesn’t stand out like it does in a certain Wakandian film.

Many, including myself, complained about the level of destruction and violence that occurred in the film but this is the consequence of war, and an allegory at Superman’s internal turmoil. Instead of uttering the phrase, “I’m being torn apart,” Snyder and co. decided to show and not tell.

War is not oversaturated heroes flying around defeating bad guys without it taking a toll on them – war is ugly, it’s devastating, and damaging both externally and internally.

During a scene that shows Clark fighting with his father Jonathan, Snyder yet again uses nature’s rage to parallel Clark’s, this time by the means of a tornado.

Clark is ordered by his father to take his mother to safety, and when Martha realizes that she’d forgotten the family dog in the truck, it is Jonathan that decides to go save it, which he does, only to be injured and lose the ability to get himself back to safety.

Clark, seeing this, moves forward to save his father using his abilities, only to have Jonathon raise his hand and subtly shake his head no, due to the countless witnesses around forcing Clark to stand by and watch his father perish.

This heart wrenching moment haunts Clark and is the basis of his identity crisis having lost the only father he’d known up until this point, and no other connection to his birth parents.

Never had we seen this amount of heaviness in a Superman film – and this is why MAN OF STEEL is as powerful as it is.

It’s all in the choices that Clark makes – the decisions that later carry consequence.

On the other side of the coin, General Zod, the film’s antagonist is one whose choice was taken from him at the time of his artificially designed pre-determined role to fill Krypton’s society.

He was designed to fight for Krypton and as such knows nothing else and cannot chose anything else to fight for nor live for.

Zod’s arc brings forth the theological aspects of the film.

His initial feud with Clark’s father is due to Jor-El being very much an advocate of free choice, which made him a criminal and an enemy of the State on Krypton.

Jor-El, an advocate of free will, sends his only son Kal-El in the hope that he will continue that philosophy and bring hope to the people of Earth.

Hans Zimmer’s musical landscape for MAN OF STEEL is another crucial layer of this film.

Zimmer brings forth the souls of the characters with the sounds of his melodies and the rage of Superman with the gusto of his percussions.

Earth, one of the final tracks on the soundtrack, is a bittersweet theme for the trinity of Clark Kent: the son/man, the hero, the heart.

Ultimately, this film is about the internal fight of a man who is trying to figure out who he is, where he belongs, and what his purpose on this planet called Earth is, and the brilliance of it is that the film ends with Clark only taking one step towards figuring it out. It's the Superman chapter we needed.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

GarethBNov 16, 2018

A mixed bag, some excellent shots, the start on krypton is very sci fi. Engaging main villains but superman himself is dull and the end descends into destruction porn of the dullest order.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

EgeBerkSep 28, 2018

don't know if there's ever been a film about Superman's history, his planet and his family.That's what I liked most about this movie.

it just bothered some times I had so much war scene I didn't expect to have so much action,could have beendon't know if there's ever been a film about Superman's history, his planet and his family.That's what I liked most about this movie.

it just bothered some times I had so much war scene I didn't expect to have so much action,could have been less than his was good.
Superman is very well chosen I like a superman,at the same time as the body of this man Superman liked you say.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

ErikTheCriticSep 25, 2018

This reboot has beautiful visuals and an abundance of intense action sequences, and proves that Henry Cavill was a great casting choice as Superman.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

PolDissectorSep 1, 2018

Henry Cavill does an outstanding job as the Superman Icon. Out of all of Zack Snyder's movies, Man of Steel is the greatest.

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

6

4zaAug 2, 2018

I feel bad for this movie. I see the idea, but I just don't think it worked all that well. There is still enough to enjoy in this film to make it a fun watch, but it definitely is flawed.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

4

natedeugJul 25, 2018

The movie starts strong, but, by the end, I was just confused about how I should feel.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

NolanLundgaardJun 26, 2018

Man of Steel was a lot better than I thought it would be, but it still failed to be as good as some stories from MARVEL. The plot was good, if not a little slow at times. The special effects/CGI were amazing in the action and the fightMan of Steel was a lot better than I thought it would be, but it still failed to be as good as some stories from MARVEL. The plot was good, if not a little slow at times. The special effects/CGI were amazing in the action and the fight scenes, but everywhere else they looked like the filmmakers could have done a better job. Bottom line: Great movie, but it could have been better.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

seanreneauMay 13, 2018

Man of Steel while very dark for Superman is very entertaining and has a solid villain. Overall Man of Steel packs a solid punch.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

LivingTribunalApr 23, 2018

I know what critics are trying to say, but this movie was amazing in my opinion. It still made us have hope that DC Universe is not that bad. I loved Hans Zimmer's beautiful score, and I loved the villain. I loved the action sequences, but II know what critics are trying to say, but this movie was amazing in my opinion. It still made us have hope that DC Universe is not that bad. I loved Hans Zimmer's beautiful score, and I loved the villain. I loved the action sequences, but I hated the place where Superman fought, Metropolis. It was so unrealistic, and I couldn't even see a shop or at least a park. I know that it's crowded city in the comics, but it didn't have its own characteristics in the movie. I think the movie was good compared to other next DC movies.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

CTHReviewsMar 13, 2018

Man of Steel is pretty great in my opinion. To anyone complaining it's too dark, I just reject that notion. We've seen many serious superhero movies that were based on silly comic books (The Dark Knight, Captain America: The Winter Soldier,Man of Steel is pretty great in my opinion. To anyone complaining it's too dark, I just reject that notion. We've seen many serious superhero movies that were based on silly comic books (The Dark Knight, Captain America: The Winter Soldier, Logan, etc.) and nobody complained about those. The "too dark" criticism is just a scapegoat excuse for not being able to properly criticize a movie.

Henry Cavill's Superman is treated like an actual human being in the 2010's. Having powers isn't easy, and suddenly finding out that you're not even from this world is just emotionally brutal.

The internal conflict is also fantastic. One father (Pa Kent) saying you need to be a good man and hide your powers from the world and another father (Jor-El) saying you need to be the savior of the human race. I love Man of Steel. Best Superman movie yet.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

merijnjFeb 21, 2018

(76/100)
Great movie, too much destruction and immortal beings fighting in my opinion but still a fun movie.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

AngryIgorFeb 16, 2018

this is basically RIP DCEU part 1. Zack snyder cant do a movie... when you have already boring and ridiculous character its hard to create good movie... terrible plot, characters, villains, this is really like some kind of bad joke. Learnthis is basically RIP DCEU part 1. Zack snyder cant do a movie... when you have already boring and ridiculous character its hard to create good movie... terrible plot, characters, villains, this is really like some kind of bad joke. Learn from marvel DCEU...… Expand

1 of 6 users found this helpful15

All this user's reviews

8

arkinkaulJan 15, 2018

MAN OF STEEL is a more realistic take on the superhero genre. This is what would happen if there actually was a superman. The cinematography is really good and visually appealing. A really good movie by Zack Snyder.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

4

luke100Jan 9, 2018

The dark, gritty atmosphere doesn't really suit Superman, but I appreciate the attempt. The vast majority of movie is somewhat boring and the disjointed story is not as well-executed as in Nolan's Batman trilogy, but parts of the finale wereThe dark, gritty atmosphere doesn't really suit Superman, but I appreciate the attempt. The vast majority of movie is somewhat boring and the disjointed story is not as well-executed as in Nolan's Batman trilogy, but parts of the finale were pretty kick-ass.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

SrPepeJan 3, 2018

Un Superman prometedor, espero que cumpla con su cometido en el futuro. El villano y la historia regular.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

ReubenIsAGodJan 6, 2014

SO for me with flicks, I've kinda been trying to be more critical and think, more so, about how this film has affected me, how has it moved me, or affected me on an emotional spiritual level. Did it stand the test of time and make me go WOW,SO for me with flicks, I've kinda been trying to be more critical and think, more so, about how this film has affected me, how has it moved me, or affected me on an emotional spiritual level. Did it stand the test of time and make me go WOW, so fantastic, and how much do i remember enjoying. I actually really enjoy many elements of this flick. Its kinda just really entertaining, and I actually really enjoying seeing Zack Snyder's vision...But its very very very bland. Like, eh, the actual script is quite the mundane clique superhero story. It's alright. It's just light entertainment really.… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

7

spacebear1Dec 9, 2017

Zack Snyder's Man of Steel is, for me personally, the best Superman film yet. Henry Cavill was an amazing choice for Superman and I also liked Michael Shannon as General Zod. A lot of people complained that the film was dark in both tone andZack Snyder's Man of Steel is, for me personally, the best Superman film yet. Henry Cavill was an amazing choice for Superman and I also liked Michael Shannon as General Zod. A lot of people complained that the film was dark in both tone and absence of a lot of color. I have two things to say about that. One, that's just Zack Snyder's style. Two, not all superhero films have to be rainbows and unicorns and always happy. In the end, this is a film that is very enjoyable and is great with some room for improvement. My rating would be 7.8/10… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

StewmistaNov 26, 2017

A bunch of boring set up with an even more boring finale. Good casting couldn't help this snooze fest from its terrible action, terrible villain and poorly constructed introduction on Krypton with a bunch of nonsense with Russel Crow.

1 of 9 users found this helpful18

All this user's reviews

6

mrdr4gonNov 15, 2017

Somewhat underwritten, the visceral nature of the action scenes paper over the cracks and make you overlook the sheer excess of it all for the most part.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

Bugger217Sep 3, 2017

Man of Steel is a well-intentioned film that doesn't always hit the mark, but when it does, it hits hard. There's some strong thematic work in here, and while those themes aren't always fully explored, it's still more interesting to watchMan of Steel is a well-intentioned film that doesn't always hit the mark, but when it does, it hits hard. There's some strong thematic work in here, and while those themes aren't always fully explored, it's still more interesting to watch than a lot of other superhero movies. It helps that Zack Snyder is a strong visual director. The film is stunning to look at and the action is some of the best ever in a film like this. That's not to say the movie isn't over-indulgent or misguided at times, because it is, but the things it gets right, in my mind, more than make up for the missteps.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

Termin8terSep 7, 2017

Look, this film was nowhere near as good as Nolan's The Dark Knight, but is a great flick. The production values are great, Hans Zimmer's soundtrack is amazing, the fight secenes are epic, and the acting and writing is on point mostly. YouLook, this film was nowhere near as good as Nolan's The Dark Knight, but is a great flick. The production values are great, Hans Zimmer's soundtrack is amazing, the fight secenes are epic, and the acting and writing is on point mostly. You may not like it, but this film should be given a shot by anyone who likes DC or any recent DC film adaptions.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

Kes4278Aug 1, 2017

I thought it was a great origin movie.It's definitely my favorite superman film.Henry Cavill was great as the man of steel.Amy Adams was meh. I give a 10/10

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

HJRodrigoJun 16, 2013

I feel this movie was lacking in heart and wholesomeness, something that I would have expected to find in a Superman origin story. This adaptation completely failed to immerse me into, or even introduce me to, the world of Superman... and byI feel this movie was lacking in heart and wholesomeness, something that I would have expected to find in a Superman origin story. This adaptation completely failed to immerse me into, or even introduce me to, the world of Superman... and by "world" I mean Metropolis and Smallville. The destruction of Metropolis and death of Pa Kent failed to illicit any emotion out of me, as the movie did not develop these key elements of Superman's life. The audience is just expected to care about these occurrences by default. However, these are not my primary issues with the movie. For a first installment of a franchise, this movie went overboard on its plot and action. DC should have had this movie's plot take place on a smaller scale, therefore giving a sequel sufficient room to up the ante. Marvel did this very well with their superhero franchises. Marvel started their hero's initial movie on a fairly small scale and increased the threat level in subsequent films till it reached the high level of world destruction we saw in the "Avengers". Unfortunately "Man of Steel" has already desensitized the audience to the world being at risk of destruction; therefore, the only way a Justice League movie can up the ante is now with the destruction of the galaxy or universe. I don't even know how a sequel to the "Man of Steel" can up the ante properly. Zod is arguably the only villain to be Superman's true equal as they are both Kryptonians. The ridiculous level of collateral damage done in this movie, due their battle, was way over the top and made the fight between the Hulk and Abomination from "The Incredible Hulk" look like child's play. In order for a sequel to top this movie, Superman will have to face somebody on the scale of Doomsday, Darkseid or Brainiac. In future installments, A villain like Lex Luthor would seem too tame in comparison to Zod. How could a villain like Lex Luthor compare with the total annihilation of humanity? In my opinion, Lex Luthor should have been the first villain introduced and the story should have started out on the smaller scale of stopping the villain from taking over the city or country.… Expand

1 of 8 users found this helpful17

All this user's reviews

10

gzayas91Dec 21, 2014

The real superman film I wanted. I didn't not care for original series. I thought they were lame and boring, the acting, the action, writing, the story, BLAND!!!. This is the film that should been critical acclaim and adore by fans. TheThe real superman film I wanted. I didn't not care for original series. I thought they were lame and boring, the acting, the action, writing, the story, BLAND!!!. This is the film that should been critical acclaim and adore by fans. The better story, acting, writing, action, and climax.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

5

eva3si0nJun 11, 2017

Rather sad movie. The single plus is special effects and setting. Quite good mounting and computer graphics, but scenario totally ludicrous. There is no development of characters, generally there is should speaks what motives are pursued byRather sad movie. The single plus is special effects and setting. Quite good mounting and computer graphics, but scenario totally ludicrous. There is no development of characters, generally there is should speaks what motives are pursued by characters? It is necessary only to guess ¯/_(ツ)_/¯… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

bfoore90Jun 10, 2017

I panned this film at first glance, it almost felt like a Michael Bay movie with mass explosions and a bare bones story. After a second and maybe third viewing, I think this movie grew on me a bit more. Its a solid origin story that focusesI panned this film at first glance, it almost felt like a Michael Bay movie with mass explosions and a bare bones story. After a second and maybe third viewing, I think this movie grew on me a bit more. Its a solid origin story that focuses on Clark's time in Krypton and General Zod's lust for power in a time of crisis. The standouts for me are Kevin Costner, Russell Crowe, Michael Shannon, Diane Lane and Henry Cavill who were all good castings and did well with their rolls. The story does a good job of being its own movie while not trying too hard to set up for future movies or installments. On the downside, I did find the film to be unnecessarily dark at times, there was also I felt a over use of CGI and not enough practical effects.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

TJUC123Jun 8, 2017

A beatiful origin story and a beautiful movie overall. Man of Steel is a story of heartbreak and rises to happiness. It is a twist on a story we have seen before. Sure there are things that I don't like personally like, but I will put thatA beatiful origin story and a beautiful movie overall. Man of Steel is a story of heartbreak and rises to happiness. It is a twist on a story we have seen before. Sure there are things that I don't like personally like, but I will put that aside as this is a movie for everyone, an not just an individual. Overall this movie is a recommendation for families who just want to leave the real world for a moment and just have fun.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

mrmonsterJun 4, 2017

A first glance, I did not like it that much, but after the second viewing, I realized how great of a movie it was. Great cast, great action, great script.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

007FilmReviewerJun 4, 2017

my body is ready my body is ready my body is ready my body is ready my body is ready my body is ready my body is ready my body is ready my body is ready

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

Equalizer_77Jun 3, 2017

For what it represents, by history, by music and effects,I think it is a film that is very little valued.Is a very good start to good saga. The act of amy adams did not have much argument to give, but the rest in the movie was very good.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

SonicHD7May 31, 2017

With the imminent destruction of Krypton, their home planet, Jor-El (Russell Crowe) and his wife seek to preserve their race by sending their infant son to Earth. The child's spacecraft lands at the farm of Jonathan (Kevin Costner) and MarthaWith the imminent destruction of Krypton, their home planet, Jor-El (Russell Crowe) and his wife seek to preserve their race by sending their infant son to Earth. The child's spacecraft lands at the farm of Jonathan (Kevin Costner) and Martha (Diane Lane) Kent, who name him Clark and raise him as their own son. Though his extraordinary abilities have led to the adult Clark (Henry Cavill) living on the fringe of society, he finds he must become a hero to save those he loves from a dire threat.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

MonkiReviewsMay 27, 2017

I enjoyed the action and story of this movie. The only downfall was when the story was going slow, and lasted longer than it should. It deserves a watch.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

connor34May 18, 2017

A beautifully shot movie and one that does extreme justice to Superman. I'm happy that Zack Snyder took this seriously and didn't introduce DC as a Marvel Movie. This is a proper DC movie.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

ZerpnosMar 4, 2017

Biraz geç kalınmış fakat Marvel'ın ardından sinemaya evrenini aktarmaya çalışan DC ilk olarak dünyayı yok etmek isteyen Superman'in düşmanları ile evrene başlamış ve Superman'e yer vermiştir. Hikayenin orta seviye olduğu filmde aksiyonBiraz geç kalınmış fakat Marvel'ın ardından sinemaya evrenini aktarmaya çalışan DC ilk olarak dünyayı yok etmek isteyen Superman'in düşmanları ile evrene başlamış ve Superman'e yer vermiştir. Hikayenin orta seviye olduğu filmde aksiyon yeterli düzeyde.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

MindtricksFeb 28, 2017

Despues de superman 1, Man of Steel se convirtio en una de las mejores peliculas de superheroes seguido de Watchmen, The Dark Knight, y Spiderman 2, Zack Snyder logra darle un giro nuevo a Superman exitosamente demostrando como seria si unDespues de superman 1, Man of Steel se convirtio en una de las mejores peliculas de superheroes seguido de Watchmen, The Dark Knight, y Spiderman 2, Zack Snyder logra darle un giro nuevo a Superman exitosamente demostrando como seria si un kriptoniano existiera en la vida real, acompañado con un hermosos soundtrack, increibles batallas y escenas memorables que logran convertirla en mi top de mejores peliculas de Superheroes.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

amai2739Jan 25, 2017

Zack Snyder's Man of Steel to me was absolutely what we deserve of the hero. If Superman was to exist in the real world, this is how I'd imagine it to be. The story, the visual, and the action choreography (was 1 of the best for a superheroZack Snyder's Man of Steel to me was absolutely what we deserve of the hero. If Superman was to exist in the real world, this is how I'd imagine it to be. The story, the visual, and the action choreography (was 1 of the best for a superhero movie). I remember when fans would complain that Superman was a boring character because not anyone can take him on, so the director had him take on General Zod & kneel before him. Henry Cavill is my favorite Superman to date.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

0

DanielfosterJan 7, 2017

Worse than X-Men Last Stand and Spiderman 3. None of the story makes sense as the whole film is full of contradictions. Several characters manage to impossibly show up wherever the plot needs them to as well. It's hard to side with supermanWorse than X-Men Last Stand and Spiderman 3. None of the story makes sense as the whole film is full of contradictions. Several characters manage to impossibly show up wherever the plot needs them to as well. It's hard to side with superman in this film as you watch him do more harm than good.… Expand

2 of 11 users found this helpful29

All this user's reviews

10

TheMoeJan 4, 2017

Man of Steel takes Superman and makes him realistic. The movie has superman fighting like he never has before and truly shows a world where superheroes can live in. The movie is amazing in its character development and action scenes.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

FreedomFightersJan 3, 2017

You win some, you lose some, I guess. Not every superhero film can come out and be a well-received, outstanding film, a la "The Dark Knight." And it's a shame, because after seeing the film multiple times, I really don't want to say that "ManYou win some, you lose some, I guess. Not every superhero film can come out and be a well-received, outstanding film, a la "The Dark Knight." And it's a shame, because after seeing the film multiple times, I really don't want to say that "Man of Steel" is just okay. I really want to give the film a higher score and I want to say that I loved the film, but unfortunately, I just can't bring myself to say that. Visually, it's stunning, and it's also well-acted, action-packed and generally exciting. That said, the writing and the characters just aren't as amazing as the pretty visuals and the action, and it's a shame. I really really want to say that "Man of Steel" is an amazing Summer blockbuster film that everyone will enjoy, but I just can't say that. I can say that "Man of Steel" is a decently entertaining superhero film, just nothing extremely spectacular. Go in with your expectations tempered.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

moheetoDec 22, 2016

This is good. I think it's user score reflects that this film is much more highly regarded than various internet douches would have you believe. I liked the structure, it mixed things up a bit but was entirely coherent. It looks gorgeous, ofThis is good. I think it's user score reflects that this film is much more highly regarded than various internet douches would have you believe. I liked the structure, it mixed things up a bit but was entirely coherent. It looks gorgeous, of course. The performances are universally good. Zod is threatening but you can see why he does what he does. Clark and Superman are beautifully portrayed by Henry Cavill. I love the uncertainty he brings to early Superman. The Smallville action scene is genuinely awesome. On the downside, the climax is mis-judged, not because of the amount of death and destruction but it's just too long and the CGI grates. The scene on board the Kryptonion ship is a bit hokey. But I do believe this to be in the top three super-hero movies ever made.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

Iserlohn14Dec 18, 2016

Pure exhilaration. Nolan's contributions to the script definitely helped, but it looks like Snyder finally found a story that brings out his best qualities as a director. Probably has the best superhero action scenes ever, to boot. Cavill wasPure exhilaration. Nolan's contributions to the script definitely helped, but it looks like Snyder finally found a story that brings out his best qualities as a director. Probably has the best superhero action scenes ever, to boot. Cavill was born to play this role.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

8

MasterRileyDec 11, 2016

Man of Steel in some ways is an odd origin story for Superman but overall I still really enjoy watching this film. I like the casting choices and the heart the movie has. Many don't like the ending, but I personally appreciated the differentMan of Steel in some ways is an odd origin story for Superman but overall I still really enjoy watching this film. I like the casting choices and the heart the movie has. Many don't like the ending, but I personally appreciated the different take on Superman's character.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

LinttaFlamingoNov 25, 2016

Man of Steel looks and sounds good, and it has some very well directed action, but it has some pacing issues and a lot of weird information pours that felt a bit off in my opinion, but I would say that it's a successful way to introduceMan of Steel looks and sounds good, and it has some very well directed action, but it has some pacing issues and a lot of weird information pours that felt a bit off in my opinion, but I would say that it's a successful way to introduce Superman to the DC Extended Universe.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

ClipStateNov 14, 2016

This is perhaps the best film to introduce the modern audience to Superman. Gripping straight from the start, Man of Steel takes the audience from the new and improved Krypton to the revised childhood of Clark Kent to his first climacticThis is perhaps the best film to introduce the modern audience to Superman. Gripping straight from the start, Man of Steel takes the audience from the new and improved Krypton to the revised childhood of Clark Kent to his first climactic encounter with his titular nemesis Zod. It does everything right in a reboot, and it does it exceptionally well. Zack Snyder's choice for more graphical/ stylistic cinematography more akin to the comics is well implemented and brings back the strength of Superman. Cavill's portrayal of the beginning superhero is near perfect. Casting choices were great albeit character relations seemed a tad off. Despite this, the action never ceases to be engaging and fight scenes were amazingly done on a massive scale. I believe that this movie is extraordinarily underrated as it is able to capture the essence of the modern Superman perfectly. We get to see more of Kent's backstory as well as a more emotional take on the characters around him. The lack of a solid relationship with Amy Adam's character is preferred but not necessarily essential as it has been thoroughly established by the past few films. Overall, this is a magnificent start to the DCEU and sets the stage for the (also excellent) Batman v Superman. There can always be parts that can be be improved upon, but for now this is the best introduction to the modern Superman anyone can get. More emotional than the stiff Superman Returns, while also packing the action nessecary to captivate this ages audience. I think Man of Steel should be the standing example of what a good superhero film should be today. Side Note: When in comparison to films like The Dark Knight, it obviously isn't as well crafted but I'd like to think that TDK Trilogy is in a league of its own.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

AfNinoAug 23, 2016

What Man of Steel delivers in great action sequences, visual effects and musical score, it dearly fails in its poor storytelling, dull tone and bad direction. The overall pacing of the film was my biggest dislike, going from extreme action toWhat Man of Steel delivers in great action sequences, visual effects and musical score, it dearly fails in its poor storytelling, dull tone and bad direction. The overall pacing of the film was my biggest dislike, going from extreme action to slow storytelling and flashbacks, right back to fast action without keeping consistency on how the plot is developing. The final fight was, even though great action, pretty much pointless from the plot's point of view. Character development outside of Superman was, well....to be fair there pretty much was none. The dull tone of the movie really went in the opposite direction as to what Superman is and what he should be. The moments between Clark and Lois Lane seemed off. There didn't seem to really be a connection.

On the other side though, there are some things this movie does right. Michael Shannon made a great villain in General Zod. Hans Zimmer once again delivers a musical score that, even though at times delivers an unnecessary darker tone, connects the audience with the power that Superman has.

Overall, if you're willing to bypass the obvious storytelling flaws just to see Superman do battle in epic action sequences, this is the movie for you. Everyone else, proceed at your own risk.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

UNARMED_JORDAug 21, 2016

although its extreme action sequences are as far fetched as ever, Man of steel offers a different perspective upon the superman story and overall emotion and action are balanced out which make this film a possible masterpiece.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

Muskrat147Aug 15, 2016

Though infused with substantial action sequences and mild bits of emotion, Man of Steel still can't make up for its over-the-top direction, thinly-written story, and controversial finale.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

selim99Aug 10, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Man of Steel is neither the best DC film nor the best movie that Zack Snyder has ever created. However, it is the Superman movie that we deserved. Although there are some pacing issues; the story is solid, the acting is great, the action sequences are awesome, and the musical score is just perfect.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

nsroehlAug 7, 2016

One of my favorite super hero movies ever made. After seeing this the first time I really like it. Now after seeing it multiple times and as a few years have passed I absolutely love this movie. There will always be parts that could haveOne of my favorite super hero movies ever made. After seeing this the first time I really like it. Now after seeing it multiple times and as a few years have passed I absolutely love this movie. There will always be parts that could have been done a little better, but over all this is the best superman adaption ever brought to the big screen. The music is great, the thought put into the villain and their motivations is great, the thought put into superman feeling like an alien and coming to grips with this is great, and the action is amazing if a bit much at times in the end but what do you expect from Snyder. Easily in my top 5 favorite super hero movies.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Antgiog1202Jul 29, 2016

Man of Steel is one of the most underrated superhero movies of all time! My excitement for this movie definitely payed off as it is beautifully directed by Zack Snyder as he rivets me from scene to scene. He is not the greatest director ever,Man of Steel is one of the most underrated superhero movies of all time! My excitement for this movie definitely payed off as it is beautifully directed by Zack Snyder as he rivets me from scene to scene. He is not the greatest director ever, but he does manage to give us a pretty bad-ass superhero flick that we should come to expect out of Superman. With his masterpiece of Watchmen, he has proven us that he can indeed create a breathtaking comic-book adaptation -- excluding Batman v. Superman.

Rating: 7/10… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

5

CinemaphileJul 29, 2016

Slower than a Malick flick, less powerful than the Lost finale, able to leap critical narratives points with multiple bounds. It's a turd. It's, uh... lame. It's ...

Supermeh! Though well photographed, well acted, and well trussed withSlower than a Malick flick, less powerful than the Lost finale, able to leap critical narratives points with multiple bounds. It's a turd. It's, uh... lame. It's ...

Supermeh!

Though well photographed, well acted, and well trussed with photo-realistic CG, Zach Snyder's Man of Steel is missing the key element present in his best film, Watchmen - a
compelling story. The Dark Knight's Christopher Nolan, opts to abandon the core Moses/Achilles archetype, retooling the mythology as a darker, more brooding, conflicted Kryptonian orphan questioning his identity. The choice was ill advised and works against the ethos of nearly a century of the character's canon. There are far too few moments which capture the "hope" Superman's sigil is now purported to symbolize. Ultimately, Man of Steel is disjointed, flashback riddled mess with little or no narrative arc. Sadly, Kal El doesn't emerge as the savior of truth, justice or the American way, but an ineffectual buffer against the fallout of his own planet's dysfunctional end. Where Snyder effectively fails is that he doesn't rely on those writers such as Alan Moore, John Byrne or Frank Miller who could - no pun intended - gotten to the core of Kal El's DNA. In fact, Kal El's DNA epitomizes what's wrong with Man of Steel - plot elements need to be connected and purposeful, qualities this incarnation lack in abundance. Though workmanlike in his performance, Henry Cavill cannot give Kal El the gravitas, or the stature the roll demands. Again, trying to give Superman the angst of Bruce Wayne is this film's critical flaw, one which no cast or CG can overcome.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

silencerJul 28, 2016

So, I'm not a comic book fan, so I take this movie for what it is - an entertainment.
And, tbh, it's not a bad entertainment at all.
Sure, the first half is a bit slow, and riddled with flashback, but hey, you gotta develop the characterSo, I'm not a comic book fan, so I take this movie for what it is - an entertainment.
And, tbh, it's not a bad entertainment at all.

Sure, the first half is a bit slow, and riddled with flashback, but hey, you gotta develop the character somehow.

The 2nd half is non-stop action, and, stupid fun as it may be, it's still entertaining. Everything is so structurally unsound and apparently filled with explosives it's hilarious! Yes, there's an obvious plot hole based on miscommunication, but I guess they needed to create the tension somehow.

For those who say it's dark and moody - you should really go watch Dark Knight again: that movie was dark and depressing on so many levels. This one is just literally 'dark' because of the color palette used, but other than that, no major deaths and the S-man is always there to save the day. Imho, Terminator 2 has a darker tone than this movies, and that's saying something.

To summarize, it's a nice blockbuster movie with decent entertainment value. It's nothing to write home about, but it's worth the time to see it.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

MovieLover123Jul 26, 2016

Man of Steel is the best interpretation of the Superman character I have seen so far. Many critics don't know how hard it is to create a Superman movie without it becoming corny or downright boring aka Superman Returns. Conclusion, ZackMan of Steel is the best interpretation of the Superman character I have seen so far. Many critics don't know how hard it is to create a Superman movie without it becoming corny or downright boring aka Superman Returns. Conclusion, Zack Snyder, proceed!… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

luisfelipe1986Jul 5, 2016

an amazing visual film with a modern take on the character a movie that works together with the DCEU movies especially Batman v Superman in terms of character development. a great new superman.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

Aaron_WassermanJun 1, 2016

Man of Steel is the best Superman movie in my opinion. I was never that into him until I saw this movie. Cavill is the definitive Superman. My gripe with this movie is the over the top action and fight sequences that went on for too long.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

timjunior5May 18, 2016

Sure, the script is lacking and the action is a bit over-the-top, but "Man of Steel" still succeeds as a fantastic superhero story. The characters seem real and intense, and the score is breathtaking. If you love Superman, you're going toSure, the script is lacking and the action is a bit over-the-top, but "Man of Steel" still succeeds as a fantastic superhero story. The characters seem real and intense, and the score is breathtaking. If you love Superman, you're going to love this movie!… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

Jimi360May 13, 2016

I seriously enjoyed this movie. It is by no means perfect, and the darker tone can sometimes make it a little dull, considering how difficult it is to make a genuinely good Superman movie I feel Man of Steel delivered.

One thing I wantedI seriously enjoyed this movie. It is by no means perfect, and the darker tone can sometimes make it a little dull, considering how difficult it is to make a genuinely good Superman movie I feel Man of Steel delivered.

One thing I wanted to see was Zack Snyder establish the Man of Steel, and highlight that this is an ORIGIN story. I feel that he delivered here. Superman is instantly shown to be a flawed individual, who has conflicting morales and emotions and, though as he gains more experience as the hero he will become the Superman that we know and love, this current inexperienced, young and emotional Superman is perfect for this new DC Universe. Henry Cavill plays the role very well, I enjoyed his performance and feel he will only get better as the Man of Steel. The score is incredible, and captures the tone and feeling of the movie in different scenes perfectly. Smaller roles such as Kevin Costner's Jonathan Kent and Lawerence Fishbourne's Perry White make excellent additions to the movie also. The main attraction here, as it is with most of Snyder's movies, is the action. The fight scenes with Zod's army and Zod himself are unbelievable, and the best action scenes of any superhero movie I have ever seen. Though it can sometimes become a little hard to follow, there special effects are unreal and must be seen for yourself.

I was not crazy on Amy Adams' Lois Lane, despite being a fan of her acting. I feel she was slightly more of a damsel in distress than she should have been. I also think that sometimes the dialogue and story does fall flat on occasion, which is fairly standard in Zack Snyder movies.

All in all though, I believe the critics have got this one very wrong. It is a very enjoyable movie which could be the start of something great for DC. If they don't mess it up.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

johan12345May 11, 2016

This is how a Superman movie should be made. It was a thriller from start to finish and I enjoyed every second of it. The fight scenes in this movie are legendary.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

EmpyreaMay 11, 2016

This movie is just great. It has everything: good plot, actors, spectacular special effects and a fantastic soundtrack. The suit of Superman has been improved and is more sofisticated and real than in other movies. I love this movie so much!This movie is just great. It has everything: good plot, actors, spectacular special effects and a fantastic soundtrack. The suit of Superman has been improved and is more sofisticated and real than in other movies. I love this movie so much! If you like superheroe movies and sci-fi, you must see this film.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

MetaHumanCriticMay 5, 2016

A lot of the hate against this film is because of the attachment that long time fans had to the late 70's version of Superman. Christopher Reeve did an amazing job with Superman. For it's time and for that vision. He did great. People areA lot of the hate against this film is because of the attachment that long time fans had to the late 70's version of Superman. Christopher Reeve did an amazing job with Superman. For it's time and for that vision. He did great. People are attached to that version of Superman. In 1978 where Lois Lane can't tell the difference between Superman and Clark Kent. Even the 1978 version of Superman had moments of darkness where he went through self doubt in the fortess of solitude and grew a beard and punched people at a diner.
Man of Steel's Superman is so compelling and so well written and acted out by Henry Cavill. It's a compelling story of self discovery. Clark Kent does not become Superman until he is 33 years old. The acting in this film is terrific, Michael Shannon and Russell Crowe steal the show as General Zod and Jor El, Superman's Krypton father. The first 20 minutes of the film are amazing. Sent to earth in Moses like fashion. Rather than being treated like a campy hero in this universe. Superman is a strange alien who is seen as a threat almost devil like. This is exactly what would happen in today's society. Ultimately, Superman accepts the responsibility of being the earth's savior. So many religious tones in this film. Great looking and great feeling film. Very emotional and compelling. Hans Zimmer's music is mesmerizing. Such a beautifully made film that is treated by some in a very ugly fashion.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

MCSnoahApr 27, 2016

Man of Steel is by the best Superman movie to DATE. Henry Cavill is worthy to the role of Superman once perfected by Christopher Reeve. Michael Shannon as General Zod intimated me and you feel for his character as he wants to make sureMan of Steel is by the best Superman movie to DATE. Henry Cavill is worthy to the role of Superman once perfected by Christopher Reeve. Michael Shannon as General Zod intimated me and you feel for his character as he wants to make sure krypton will still exist regardless of the amount of people he kills. Amy Adams as Lois Lane impressed me because for so long Lois Lane was the stereotypical girl who would always be in danger, where as in this movie she is a self independent woman who give up on a story.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

UrbanlistenerApr 20, 2016

Great film, definitely one of the better DC movies, Zack Snyder took a drastic new direction with this Superman compared to ones we had before. Much darker, violent and grittier, a style Snyder is known for. You'd think for a Superman movieGreat film, definitely one of the better DC movies, Zack Snyder took a drastic new direction with this Superman compared to ones we had before. Much darker, violent and grittier, a style Snyder is known for. You'd think for a Superman movie this wouldn't work, but it really does, the movie has a lot of emotional weight and you feel more involved. The acting is great, the special effects are incredible and the kind of never seen before Superman storyline is coherent, intriguing and interesting, we also get a lot of Krypton which is very nice. Deserves at least a 75% certified fresh on Rottentomatoes, 56% is very disrespectful to the quality and the efforts put into this movie.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

reviewerd1Apr 18, 2016

I really enjoyed watching this film. There is a lot of action to keep you entertained especially the fight scenes. The characters are played really well and I never got bored. The graphics are impressive and the story line is really strong. II really enjoyed watching this film. There is a lot of action to keep you entertained especially the fight scenes. The characters are played really well and I never got bored. The graphics are impressive and the story line is really strong. I can't see any reason why you wouldn't want to watch this. I highly recommend.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

aadityamudharApr 17, 2016

Man of Steel (2013) is a modern day take on the Superman lore, it introduces the viewers to Superman's past and his birth on Planet Krypton. The movie wastes no time and plunges the viewer into great action set pieces, while building theMan of Steel (2013) is a modern day take on the Superman lore, it introduces the viewers to Superman's past and his birth on Planet Krypton. The movie wastes no time and plunges the viewer into great action set pieces, while building the foundation for the movies lore.

The characters are believable and their performances are very solid for this type of movie. The so called critics who slam the movie for not having enough humour or for over the top action or for whatever unprofessional reason are completely unfounded in their "arguments" and just prove how arrogant non objective they are, this is not 1970's, hero movies must retain a serious tone to be relevant nowadays.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

4

drlowdonApr 11, 2016

Henry Cavill makes for a good Superman and there are some entertaining scenes but, to be honest, the movie is a bit of an unstructured mess and I didn't really have much idea what was going on most of the time. I did make it to the end but IHenry Cavill makes for a good Superman and there are some entertaining scenes but, to be honest, the movie is a bit of an unstructured mess and I didn't really have much idea what was going on most of the time. I did make it to the end but I was bored well before the final credits rolled.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

farzyy12Apr 11, 2016

The best Superman origin story ever told in a movie format.

Henry Cavill looked and felt like the Superman the world deserves and needed. Russell Crowe was superb as Jor-El. Filled with over-long action sequences and a re-telling of theThe best Superman origin story ever told in a movie format.

Henry Cavill looked and felt like the Superman the world deserves and needed. Russell Crowe was superb as Jor-El. Filled with over-long action sequences and a re-telling of the most iconic Superhero to ever exist in our modern time.
Michael Shannon as General Zod was frightening & intense while at the same time you can understand the reason as to why he does the things he does. Sorely for the people of Krypton!

The romance arc between Clark and Lois felt forced and lacked any real reason as to why they even fell for each other, however I did enjoy the way Lois found out about Superman.

The kryptonite for this film was its weak script. While it didn't kill the film, it certainly hurt it and made it suffer. The dialogue and the pacing could've been handled a lot better with certain sequences being executed poorly.

What did this film do best? It brought a perfect being we know as Superman into a world that is not so perfect. It threw away the Silver Age character we knew of and threw it into a pool we call realism. And that turned a perfect hero into a hero with flaws which made me care about the character. (Why care for a superhero that is always perfect?)… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

4

ElectroNickApr 8, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Zack Snyder's first outing with the DC Cinematic Universe shows some promise but it also faces major stumbling blocks. This reboot tries to depict a more humanized Superman as he tries to be the ultimate bridge between Earth and Krypton. I admire the film for its ambition and there are some good elements that are unfortunately balanced out by serious problems. The film is not your typical Superman movie for better and worse. For instance the entire movie is tinted in a greyish- blue kind of color which sucks the life out of the frame. This choice is supposed to reflect the somber mood but there is barely a balance of life in the frame. Another major failing on the technicals is the excessive use of Shaky cam. There are some scenes when it is called for such as Superman flying for the first time and a few of the crashes but there are other scenes when the shaky cam is used during quiet scenes. It especially got bad during the one scene when Johnathan Kent was trying to teach Clark a life lesson and the shaky cam got in the way of me trying to connect with the scene. On that note, Kevin Kosner played the worst portrayal of Johnathan Kent to this date as he is very apathetic and even encouraged his son to let his classmates die. Lois Lane appears to only be in this film out of obligation since her contribution to the film was very limited at best. Superman himself is very emotional detached and is reckless in his actions causing so much collateral damage that it would even make Michael Bay blush. General Zod is the one character who appears to have some depth to him as he wants to save Krypton at the cost of all life on Earth. The biggest scene that caused controversy is the scene when Superman snaps Zod's neck. This act goes against everything that the character stands for. Superman is a character that represents the best of humanity and he is a character who shows mercy to his enemies as he fights for everyone. This moment could have worked if the film had better established Superman's moral code against killing but it was never built up to that point. A better example of a hero who had to make a moral compromise by going against his no-killing code was Trigun. Trigun was an aneme that heavily establishes Vash's qualm against killing and thus it had more of an impact when he finally had to take a life to save his friends. In this film's case however, the emotional impact of Superman's actions are never brought up again. Despite these glaring issues there are some good elements in this film. The opening scene on Krypton was well done as it shows the despair of the Kryptonions in their inevitable doom. The relationship with Clark and Martha Kent is also well done as she teaches Clark how to focus his powers. In short I do see how people enjoy this film but I cannot. This is a potentially profound film that doesn't live up to its potential.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

MovieMasterEddyApr 6, 2016

At once frantically overblown and beautifully filigreed, “Man of Steel” will turn on everyone it doesn’t turn off. Summer blockbusters have a way of encouraging multiplex Manichaeism, though I propose a middle way. It won’t be easy. EvenAt once frantically overblown and beautifully filigreed, “Man of Steel” will turn on everyone it doesn’t turn off. Summer blockbusters have a way of encouraging multiplex Manichaeism, though I propose a middle way. It won’t be easy. Even those who patiently ride out the bludgeoning excesses of the film’s final 45 minutes may wonder what happened to the movie — the one about human and humanoid struggles — they watched for the first 100. They may also wonder why no one, anyone, smacked the director, Zack Snyder, in the head and reminded him that he was midwifing a superhero franchise, as the film’s first image, of a yelling, straining woman signals, not restaging the end of days.

Apocalypse Now (a movie that Mr. Snyder nods at), Apocalypse Then: The 21st century has been tough for Superman, at least at the box office. After decades of saving the world on the screen and on the page, the movie character seemed stuck, particularly after the dreary 2006 reboot, “Superman Returns.” The Superman story had been told in so many ways and in so many moods in the comics — he has married and mourned, died and been reborn — but shaping these transformative cycles into a new film, much less a viable series, remained elusive. Christopher Nolan went dark and then darker with another DC Comics legend in the Dark Knight films, but this was Superman, idealism embodied. What was there left to say about the man in the primary-color suit, especially after Sept. 11?

For starters, return to basics, and add a fighting-trim Russell Crowe, a howlingly mad Michael Shannon, that emotional guidepost Amy Adams and a superdude — the British actor Henry Cavill — so ripped that he’s nearly shredded. Much like “Batman Begins,” the first part of the Dark Knight trilogy, “Man of Steel” narrates the how and why of its character, tracing an existential arc from child to man. The difference is that while Batman has to journey into the world (with a layover in a bat cave) to acquire his particular skill set, Superman comes fully loaded. He just needs to burrow into his innermost self, hang out at the Fortress of Solitude and meet the right woman.

He does all that in “Man of Steel,” which was written by David S. Goyer from a story that he created with Mr. Nolan that extracts the canonical account from 75 years of seemingly infinitely layered supermythology. To that end, the film begins at the beginning, back on Krypton where Jor-El (Mr. Crowe) attempts to persuade its council, wearing dour expressions and ornate headdresses evocative of Gothic tracery, that their planet is doomed. It’s a measure of the film’s striking design here that the headdress latticework is echoed in some of the pleated clothing, as well as in the curvilinear buildings, suggesting that someone behind the scenes (the production designer is Alex McDowell) is an admirer of the architect Zaha Hadid and her flowing organic forms.

These graceful contours are further picked up in spaceships that float like jellyfish and in suits of armor that evoke crustaceans, adding to this alien world’s striking conceptual unity. Lovely and imperious, the headdresses are also emblems of the countervailing forces that have led to the ruin of Krypton, a civilization undone by its own advances. The resemblances to Earth are blunt enough for an eco-savvy kindergartner and pop off the screen like speech balloons. But, then, this is Superman, and Mr. Snyder, whose earlier movies include a stillborn adaptation of the graphic novel “Watchmen,” is here playing with different narrative forms as he toggles between cinematic realism and the kind of comic-book-style exaggeration that distills ideas into images.

For roughly 100 minutes, or the running time of an average movie, Mr. Snyder is in control of his material. His handling of the story’s many flashbacks, which fill in piecemeal Superman’s Kansas childhood as Clark, is fluid and apt. Each return to the past becomes another tile in the mosaic, adding to the emerging portrait of the adult wanderer and seeker he has become. His adoptive parents, Martha (Diane Lane) and Jonathan (Kevin Costner), come into focus, as does the bewildered child (played by Cooper Timberline and Dylan Sprayberry), who doesn’t understand why he’s so different. Mr. Snyder borrows too many canted camera angles and too much sun-kissed fluttering laundry from Terrence Malick, but the Kansas scenes solidify the human foundation of a divided identity.

The last 45 minutes is when Mr. Snyder piles on the hammering special effects, becoming yet one more director gone disappointingly amok.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

4

nicholas_lindenApr 2, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Zack Snyder's first outing with the DC Cinematic Universe shows some promise but it also faces major stumbling blocks. This reboot tries to depict a more humanized Superman as he tries to be the ultimate bridge between Earth and Krypton. I admire the film for its ambition and there are some good elements that are unfortunately balanced out by serious problems. The film is not your typical Superman movie for better and worse. For instance the entire movie is tinted in a greyish- blue kind of color which sucks the life out of the frame. This choice is supposed to reflect the somber mood but there is barely a balance of life in the frame. Another major failing on the technicals is the excessive use of Shaky cam. There are some scenes when it is called for such as Superman flying for the first time and a few of the crashes but there are other scenes when the shaky cam is used during quiet scenes. It especially got bad during the one scene when Johnathan Kent was trying to teach Clark a life lesson and the shaky cam got in the way of me trying to connect with the scene. On that note, Kevin Kosner played the worst portrayal of Johnathan Kent to this date as he is very apathetic and even encouraged his son to let his classmates die. Lois Lane appears to only be in this film out of obligation since her contribution to the film was very limited at best. Superman himself is very emotional detached and is reckless in his actions causing so much collateral damage that it would even make Michael Bay blush. General Zod is the one character who appears to have some depth to him as he wants to save Krypton at the cost of all life on Earth. The biggest scene that caused controversy is the scene when Superman snaps Zod's neck. This act goes against everything that the character stands for. Superman is a character that represents the best of humanity and he is a character who shows mercy to his enemies as he fights for everyone. This moment could have worked if the film had better established Superman's moral code against killing but it was never built up to that point. A better example of a hero who had to make a moral compromise by going against his no-killing code was Trigun. Trigun was an aneme that heavily establishes Vash's qualm against killing and thus it had more of an impact when he finally had to take a life to save his friends. In this film's case however, the emotional impact of Superman's actions are never brought up again. Despite these glaring issues there are some good elements in this film. The opening scene on Krypton was well done as it shows the despair of the Kryptonions in their inevitable doom. The relationship with Clark and Martha Kent is also well done as she teaches Clark how to focus his powers. In short I do see how people enjoy this film but I cannot. This is a potentially profound film that doesn't live up to its potential. Collapse… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

Swishalicious29Apr 1, 2016

A silly and over-the-top action film. The cast is pretty good and I found the scenes on Krypton to be interesting. Flashbacks to Superman's younger years were good as well. The climax is so ridiculous and the action scenes have no tension dueA silly and over-the-top action film. The cast is pretty good and I found the scenes on Krypton to be interesting. Flashbacks to Superman's younger years were good as well. The climax is so ridiculous and the action scenes have no tension due to it. The tone is too serious at times also which made it feel pretentious. The middle act is pretty boring as well. Man of Steel is a decent popcorn flick, but it really lacks the substance to make it anything more than that.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

RedeadhoodMar 28, 2016

And Snyder has divided the audience once again. The movie is definitely flawed but seriously doesn't deserve the backlash. We shouldn't have expected to see the same Superman, especially not when the times have changed and even when theAnd Snyder has divided the audience once again. The movie is definitely flawed but seriously doesn't deserve the backlash. We shouldn't have expected to see the same Superman, especially not when the times have changed and even when the Superman in the comics is no longer what he was. All I can say is that I had a great time and Micheal Shannon was definitely a compelling villain (which most Marvel movies lack).… Expand

8 of 9 users found this helpful81

All this user's reviews

8

NehuenMar 27, 2016

Muy buen reinicio para este super héroe. Años esperando una adaptación decente para el Hombre de Acero, después de bodrios (III, IV: The Quest for Peace & Returns), al fin llega una película que le hace justicia al personaje. A pesar que elMuy buen reinicio para este super héroe. Años esperando una adaptación decente para el Hombre de Acero, después de bodrios (III, IV: The Quest for Peace & Returns), al fin llega una película que le hace justicia al personaje. A pesar que el Nolan estuvo involucrado en la producción de la película, tiene algunas fallas, tanto en algun desarrollo de a lo largo de la película, aunque no es tan malo. Me encantó que Zack Snyder muestre el verdadero poder del Hombre de Acero en esta película, desde hace tiempo que quería ver a un Superman así. El soundtrack de Hans Zimmer es magnífico en toda la cinta, y en las escenas de acción lo logra mostrar mejor. Me encantó el enemigo de la película interpretado por Michael Shannon, "General Zod", un buen villano, para comenzar este reboot, incluso me parece mejor que la versión de Superman II. Muy recomendable para aquellos que desconfiaban que no iba a haber otra buena adaptación del Hombre de Acero.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

AaronWasserman1Mar 26, 2016

Man of Steel is the best Superman movie in my opinion. I was never that into him until I saw this movie. Cavill is the definitive Superman. My gripe with this movie is the over the top action and fight sequences that went on for too long.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

2

musicforallMar 25, 2016

Pa Kent is not supposed to fill Clark with fear of humanity. That bothered me much more than the mass destruction. Clark's father believed in both his son and humanity that tomorrow would be better if people weren't afraid to hope. Also,Pa Kent is not supposed to fill Clark with fear of humanity. That bothered me much more than the mass destruction. Clark's father believed in both his son and humanity that tomorrow would be better if people weren't afraid to hope. Also, Clark does not find himself traveling the world but rather is grounded in being from a small, rural American town with family who love and believe in him. That contrast against Batman makes both characters more compelling but the movie tries to make everything like Batman because he sells,

Watchmen was a great movie. Zach Snyder seems to enjoy reflecting heroes in a dark way largely because there's pressure for money and to follow gritty trends but it is disrespectful to the character of Superman.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

PeterParkerMar 25, 2016

This is one of the best DC Super Hero Movies ever. Superman is one of my favourite characters ever, i love this version of Lois Lane because is very similar to one of my favourite characters of Family Guy: Joyce Kinney. A great movie.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

ShetlandVikingMar 24, 2016

Let's get the negatives over-with: I would preferred Ed Harris as General Zod, as he would have been more intimidating. While Michael Shannon is a good actor, there's something a bit goofy about the way he speaks in the role. I did not likeLet's get the negatives over-with: I would preferred Ed Harris as General Zod, as he would have been more intimidating. While Michael Shannon is a good actor, there's something a bit goofy about the way he speaks in the role. I did not like the tornado scene. I liked certain things said by Jonathan Kent, but didn't like the way he was written overall. The were a couple of times certain plot-points could have been resolved more logically. The pacing was a bit off, and there didn't need to be so much CGI spectacle.

Other than that, this is the movie the made me like Superman. That's an achievement in itself. Great action contrasted by some touching little moments with characters like Martha Kent. The visual design of the Kryptonian elements were genius.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

5

Super-Evil-DOOMMar 23, 2016

It has a lot of the same problems Superman Returns did, with more flaws to call it's own. No amount of punches or action can make up for a soulless attempt at making Superman into Batman for the modern audience. It's a boring, pretentious,It has a lot of the same problems Superman Returns did, with more flaws to call it's own. No amount of punches or action can make up for a soulless attempt at making Superman into Batman for the modern audience. It's a boring, pretentious, drawn out film with dull, grim tone that hopes the audience will overlook it because there's a lot of punching going on.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

TheApplegnomeMar 21, 2016

Man of Steel – Revisited

DC has entered the cinematic universe, and it all begins with this 2013 entry – ´Man of Steel´. The basics aren’t that well presented, it even goes a bit meh after a couple viewings, even though it still got itsMan of Steel – Revisited

DC has entered the cinematic universe, and it all begins with this 2013 entry – ´Man of Steel´. The basics aren’t that well presented, it even goes a bit meh after a couple viewings, even though it still got its action-glamour. Plot holes, messy action & rushed storylines somehow didn’t get caught up in the writing process. A great background of the man from Krypton is a wonderful aspect yes, it even managed to bring a few ethical dilemmas to light, but the basics didn’t. The action is without any doubt great, but to fail to enlighten the audience a better, and a less odd storyline that doesn’t leave them with an “ugh that was odd”-feel; that’s bad storytelling. Our antagonist is on the other hand understandable, and both him and our main hero are very well established, and we get a lot insides to their past self, even though Zod just is a classic angry-villain. One thing is for sure and undeniable fact with this Snyder-flick; Hans Zimmer’s score might be the best aspect. Meanwhile shaky cam, an overly packed amount of vague CGI & some small fragments of overacting; that’s something BvS really got to overcome. But will Zach Snyder be able to look beyond his past and truly succeed with BvS? For the sake of the DC Universe, he better will.

Personal rating: 70/100
Critical rating: 51/100… Expand

2 of 5 users found this helpful23

All this user's reviews

7

Cinemassacre94Mar 20, 2016

Man of Steel represents the latest attempt by Warner Brothers to revive a Superman franchise that, since its stunning 1978 revival, has been abominably treated for about 30 years (ever since Richard Donner was unceremoniously fired fromMan of Steel represents the latest attempt by Warner Brothers to revive a Superman franchise that, since its stunning 1978 revival, has been abominably treated for about 30 years (ever since Richard Donner was unceremoniously fired from Superman II). This movie certainly looks and feels a lot different than any of its predecessors, and that's not just because of the crappy 3-D. It's more of a science fiction/fantasy adventure than a superhero movie. In a way that's good, because it doesn't come across like a tired retread of every origin story we've ever seen. On the other hand, it's not good, because the sci-fi feel has been overly influenced by the likes of Independence Day and Transformers. That's right: blow everything up, real good! Pyrotechnics! Special Effects! CGI up the wazoo! For those who crave cinematic mayhem, Man of Steel is right up your alley (and it will make a ton of money). But something important has been lost along the way: heart. This is a cold, sterile motion picture. The characters are so thinly drawn that it's tough to get much feel for them. And one senses that director Zack Snyder is less interested in Superman than he is in the orgy of destruction he gets to rain down on Metropolis. Somewhere, Roland Emmerich and Michael Bay are smiling.

Man of Steel is, first and foremost, a great spectacle. The effects work is first rate and the action sequences, of which there are many, are delivered with a kinetic punch. The tone is dour - humor is at a premium and, on those rare occasions when it's there, the delivery is decidedly low-key. The movie wants desperately to be taken seriously and viewed as something more than a comic book film. Perhaps, in the end, that's one reason why Man of Steel rarely feels heroic and never truly soars. Sure, Superman eventually wins but at the cost of thousands of lives (we're not given a specific body count but it has to be very high).

Christopher Nolan's influence will be hotly debated, especially since the producer has been coy about the full extent of his involvement in the final product, stating only that "it's Zack Synder's film." Indeed, Man of Steel is closer to Watchmen than Batman Begins in terms of its look and feel. It's a style over substance thing, spectacle over heart. Snyder never ceases to amaze visually but one could make a compelling case that he "misses" what defines Superman's uniqueness. It makes sense for Batman to live in the dark but Superman has always been a figure of light and truth. That's one reason he's a difficult movie subject because there's no ambiguity about who he is and what he represents, and there's something about the darkness that pervades Man of Steel that feels wrong for the character.

The choice of Henry Cavill to don the cape is inspired; Cavill is easily the most accomplished actor thus far to fill the role and, while no one will ever fully eclipse what Christopher Reeve brought to the screen, Cavill uses Man of Steel as an opportunity to lay the foundation for what could be a long and memorable run. He combines the matinee appeal of Reeve and Brandon Routh with a stronger resume although, truth be told, the screenplay underuses his range. The main requirement for Cavill is to look the part.

As a cookie cutter supervillain, Michael Shannon does a good job overacting. He snarls and yells and exudes menace. He rants and does all sorts of nasty things. In the end, however, it's the name "Zod" that puts Shannon at a disadvantage because it forces him to exist in the long shadow of Terence Stamp. Stamp's Zod is arguably one of the twenty most memorable movie bad guys and Shannon doesn't touch him. The other casting miscalculation is Amy Adams as Lois Lane. The part doesn't fit. On the other hand, there are some great choices, although most of them are sadly underused. Laurence Fishburne makes a terrific Perry White, although he has very little screen time. Kevin Costner and Diane Lane are great as Clark's Earth parents although Costner in particular deserves more screen time.

Man of Steel delivers forcefully on its promise to take Superman in a different direction. Perhaps that's a good idea; after all, Richard Donner (with an assist from Richard Lester) has done the "traditional" Superman as well as it can be done. But a lot is missing, and the most telling absence is the element that makes Superman more the hero of his own story rather than the pawn of special effects. This is a less promising opening act than Batman Begins because it mines so little new territory. Remakes like Man of Steel are about intangibles like tone and style and how well the soul of the central conceit has been maintained. Snyder succeeds in making this movie sufficiently different to justify its existence. The open question is whether this Superman can spearhead a franchise that aspires to greatness or whether this new "dark vision" is merely window dressing.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

SanDiegoMar 14, 2016

This is the best movie in 2013, it's awesome, it's heart pounding like hell, Henry Cavill is the best superman I have ever known. The fight scenes is extremely awesome, the world engine is heart pounding, this is an awesome superhero movie ever

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

6

FuturedirectorMar 12, 2016

Man of Steel cannot be called "action film". And we gotta add that Superman's new aspect is not the real one. Could be better, developed, but it's not the Superman that we used to watch. Unfortunately, this film is also more violent thanMan of Steel cannot be called "action film". And we gotta add that Superman's new aspect is not the real one. Could be better, developed, but it's not the Superman that we used to watch. Unfortunately, this film is also more violent than action-packed film, but it's able to be called "science-fiction" film, at least. It also brings a great short love story to the cinema, and powerfully moving scenes. Maybe it could have low-human characters, but, why do we spect about superheroes films?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

3

IxSaruMar 2, 2016

Man of Steel is a partyof special effects,
trying to create morally correct characters, but you get to see cynics , and in some cases gaps ( more than once left a lousy message to the viewer )
thus creating an epic plot fomented by a greatMan of Steel is a partyof special effects,
trying to create morally correct characters, but you get to see cynics , and in some cases gaps ( more than once left a lousy message to the viewer )
thus creating an epic plot fomented by a great soundtrack, but it has no real or credible basis or based.
It has very little coherance many facts , is extremly fantastic and what else to say , try to be serious, but it is difficult take it seriously.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

1

MaxBoyzFeb 28, 2016

Well, I will try to keep this short. I love super hero movies, hater the D.C. universe in particular, and yes I have read the comics, seen previous movies and cartoons. I dont like DC comic. because it's dickhead

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

gameguardian21Feb 24, 2016

I liked this superman movie. The action is fabulous, with destroyed buildings, lots of punches, and just superman being a badass again. The story does a good job of explaining supermans orgin as. The only problem I have with this story is theI liked this superman movie. The action is fabulous, with destroyed buildings, lots of punches, and just superman being a badass again. The story does a good job of explaining supermans orgin as. The only problem I have with this story is the love story between superman and lois lane. The villian, zod, is a great dc villian. His quest to controlling earth to rebuild kripton(i dont know how to spell it) is what made him a great character. I think this was a great superman film since superman 2 from the 80s… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

10

pierov100Feb 24, 2016

I just don't have any good enough words to say about MoS.
Its been over 2 and half years now and it is still my best Superhero movie of all time.
I saw it more than 10 times over those 2 years and it gets better every time. Well the truthI just don't have any good enough words to say about MoS.
Its been over 2 and half years now and it is still my best Superhero movie of all time.
I saw it more than 10 times over those 2 years and it gets better every time.
Well the truth is Supermen's my favorite superhero of all time so this was the movie I have been waiting since the day I firs laid eyes on the big S 20 year ago.
And it is probably my biggest disagreeing with critics ever, I don't know what they saw but I guess not the same movie I did hahaha! ;)… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

8

JB562Feb 22, 2016

A nice reboot to the Superman live-action film series. Although the story seems unevenly paced in a few ways, the action scenes are undeniably incredible. In fact, the action scenes are kind of like Dragon Ball Z according to some commentators.

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

7

AgentVenom117Feb 22, 2016

Although this film is filled with over the top action and forced Jesus symbolism with Superman, I can't say I didn't have a lot of fun with this movie and I am excited to see what DC has in store for us in future movies such as Batman vAlthough this film is filled with over the top action and forced Jesus symbolism with Superman, I can't say I didn't have a lot of fun with this movie and I am excited to see what DC has in store for us in future movies such as Batman v Superman and Suicide Squad coming out this year. Although Zack Snyder clearly has problems directing and I'm glad Ben Affleck is there to maybe talk some sense into him when he gets to excited and forgets to explain things such as why Lois is so important to Zod in this movie to the point where he demands to have her in this ship. Check it out if you're a DC fan or a Superman fan or watch it with some friends if you want to see a dumb action film.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

Man of Steel

User Reviews