Neon | Release Date: August 2, 2019
7.2
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 44 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
31
Mixed:
9
Negative:
4
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
5
GreatMartinSep 6, 2019
"Luce" is a picture with many questions and very few answers, not giving you enough information to know what the questions are!

We have a white couple (Naomi Watts and Tim Roth) who adopted a black 7 year old boy(Kelvin Harrison Jr.) who was
"Luce" is a picture with many questions and very few answers, not giving you enough information to know what the questions are!

We have a white couple (Naomi Watts and Tim Roth) who adopted a black 7 year old boy(Kelvin Harrison Jr.) who was born in war torn Eritrea, Africa, and now is a model teenager who went through intensive therapy to be the perfect student and son. He is a soon-to-be valedictorian, a track star, football player, the debate team captain and to one of his black history teachers (Octavia Spencer) he represents what every black male should be who may or may not overstep her authority. She feels women must stand up for themselves using a student( Andrea Bang)) who may or may not have been assaulted by school jocks as an example and that men must be certain way.

Luce, (Harrison Jr), writes an essay the history teacher (Spencer) asks the class to submit assuming the voice of a historical figure and instead of using someone like FDR as the teacher expected Luce uses the voice of Frantz Fanon, a French West Indian psychiatrist and revolutionary who talked about violence as a weapon.

The screenwriters JC Lee and Julius Onah do not give you enough information on many points and Onah, who also directed, confuses things further by making cuts that make absolutely no sense.

All of the cast are first class from the leads, especially Kelvin Harrison Jr, Noah Gaynor and Omar Brian Bradley as his friends with the latter losing a sports scholarship because he isn't a Luce model, Marxha Stephanie Blake as the history teacher's sister with a personality disorder plus Leo Norbert Butz as the principal of the school.

"Luce" would have been a much better movie if either it made more sense or cleared up exactly what problems were involved and/or gave more information so a sensible debate could have taken place after the movie about some, if not all, the issues brought up.
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
10
franceshaSep 7, 2019
The most important American film of the decade. Run to see it, it will shake you to the core
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
Bertaut1Nov 19, 2019
A slightly repetitive, but nonetheless fascinating societal drama that rewards concentration

Adapted from the play of the same name by J.C. Lee, Luce was written for the screen by Lee and Julius Onah, and directed by Onah. Tackling all
A slightly repetitive, but nonetheless fascinating societal drama that rewards concentration

Adapted from the play of the same name by J.C. Lee, Luce was written for the screen by Lee and Julius Onah, and directed by Onah. Tackling all manner of issues, including race, class, gender, power, privilege, #MeToo, academic achievement, liberal elitism, revolutionary rhetoric, the importance of language in encoding societal/political power structures, it also works as a thriller about a young man who may, or may not, be a dangerous sociopath posing as the embodiment of the American Dream. Without question, it asks a lot of the audience, and it's by no means perfect, but, by and large, this is strong work.

In Arlington, VA, 17-year-old Luce Edgar (Kelvin Harrison, Jr.) is the adopted son of Peter (Tim Roth) and Amy (Naomi Watts). Born in Eritrea, Luce spent the first seven years of his life as a child soldier. However, with the love of his adopted parents and a lot of therapy, he has grown into an exceptional young man; all-star athlete, captain of the debating team, all-round honour student. However, when his history teacher Harriet Wilson (Octavia Spencer) gives an assignment to write from the perspective of a revolutionary, Luce chooses Frantz Fanon, the Pan-Africanist writer who argued that colonialism could only be defeated by violence. Disturbed by Luce's apparent endorsement of Fanon's theories, Wilson searches his locker without his permission, finding powerful fireworks, and so sets out to convince the Edgars that their son may be dangerous.

In a film which takes in countless themes, one of the most prevalent is race, especially the notion of differences in black identity – both Wilson and Luce are black, but Luce is also an immigrant with a vastly different frame of socio-political reference. He is an immigrant, whilst she is a child of the 60s, with direct experience of the Civil Rights Movement. However, perhaps because of this, she subscribes to respectability politics, seeing all black people as sharing a common bond. Luce disagrees, arguing there's no such thing as a monolithic black identity, and refusing to conform to Wilson's conception of what a successful black student should be. To conform to preconceived and idealised notions would be to define himself on other peoples' terms.

And, of course, it's important not to forget that amidst all the ideological differences between Luce and Wilson, their initial conflict is a more tangible one – after writing a paper about violence, he's profiled in a way that a white student would not be. The fact that Wilson herself is black is irrelevant to this – she reads what he says about violence and she assumes he shares Fanon's sentiments, and hence could very well be dangerous.

One of the things the film does especially well is toy with audience expectations. Wilson, like much of society, seems to think of Luce in binary terms – he's either a bastion of what's possible in the land of dreams or he's violent and dangerous. Cinema audiences too are conditioned to think in such binaries – we want ambiguous characters such as Luce to ultimately be revealed as one thing or the other. However, Onah delights in complicating things at every turn – when a grinning Luce mentions fireworks to Wilson, is he threatening her or is it an innocent reference to the Fourth of July; when an amiable Luce meets Wilson and her drug-addict sister Rosemary (a stunning performance by Marsha Stephanie Blake) in a supermarket, is it a coincidence or did he follow them?

In terms of problems, the audience has to do a lot of the leg work, and it's something which will be immediately distasteful to some, especially those who demand rigid binaries and clear explanations from their narratives. Personally, I loved the inherent ambiguity, but I understand that some won't. The same is true of many of the themes, which tend to be raised in something of a phenomenological vacuum, exiting almost as hypotheticals rather than prescribed answers, and again asking the audience to connect some of the dots. The film also runs too long, with much of the dramatic tension slackening in the last act. It's also prone to repetition, and it features a few too many issues, several of which are taken virtually nowhere. A subplot involving a possible sexual assault at a party, for example, pays lip-service to #MeToo but does very little beyond that.

Nevertheless, I was impressed with Luce. What it says about the US's (in)ability to engage in meaningful dialogue regarding important socio-political topics isn't flattering, but it is compelling. Essentially a film about pressure, as exerted by parents, by schools, by teachers, by friends, by society, by oneself, it's at least partly an exposé on the bitter divisions inherent in Trump's America. It does spread itself a little thin and the ambiguity won't be to everyone's taste, but this is brave filmmaking with a lot on its mind.
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
3
KenRSep 18, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Stylishly produced and very well acted, with the makings of ‘some’ good writing – yet somehow Luce trips over its own cleverness. There are so many ‘statements’ on life lessons, history (both modern and past) political correctness, complex relationship issues and just about anything else that could be crammed into its running time. So much so, that it seems writers/producers/director, JC Lee and Julius Onah appeared to have a little difficulty tying it all together, failing to convey a satisfactory understanding of all the issues. The situations in question are all way too serious to gloss over, deserving a far more solid resolution to justify the disturbing end results.

Naomi Watts gives her usual sterling performance as Luce’s mother and there’s excellent support from all those around her. The Music score, while interesting, at times tends to come across as overbearing. Some will say they understood all the convoluted characters and their various activities but if questioned, will probably find they missed an important thread or two. It’s also doubtful a teacher would use four-letter words when talking to a parent about their son! Some of the content is interesting, but let down by a somewhat overly open ending - that has obviously left many of its audience unsatisfied.
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
0
lovelyltFeb 8, 2020
What a disturbing movie!! Coming from an Asian woman’s perspective, I give this movie 0 stars for its complete degradation of an Asian woman. Not only does it show how men can get away with rape but how Asian women can’t do anything about it.What a disturbing movie!! Coming from an Asian woman’s perspective, I give this movie 0 stars for its complete degradation of an Asian woman. Not only does it show how men can get away with rape but how Asian women can’t do anything about it. Completely and utterly appalled by this disgusting sexist movie. It leaves you in a very uncomfortable place and this is the kind of harmful **** that needs to disappear for good on the big screen!!! Do not watch. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
4
LamontRaymondAug 3, 2019
The acting is good - especially Tim Roth and Octavia Spencer - but the story falls apart in the end. It's one big tease. I'm getting tired of this kind of movie.... can't recommend it.
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
8
GinaKAug 21, 2019
Luce is a riveting mystery with a wonderful cast that keeps you guessing right to the end. Even though it is set in a high school (not my favorite), some of the characters are extraneous, and occasionally the film tries a bit too hard to beLuce is a riveting mystery with a wonderful cast that keeps you guessing right to the end. Even though it is set in a high school (not my favorite), some of the characters are extraneous, and occasionally the film tries a bit too hard to be “relevant,” the film kept me interested from beginning to end – and the acting (especially Naomi Watts and Octavia Spencer) was excellent. And it is a bit too long. That said, I was never bored and the details and plot kept me guessing from beginning to end. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
9
Brent_MarchantAug 11, 2019
A riveting psychological thriller filled with endless twists and turns that leaves audiences guessing right up until the very end. What's more important, though, is that the film forces us to face some incendiary questions about race,A riveting psychological thriller filled with endless twists and turns that leaves audiences guessing right up until the very end. What's more important, though, is that the film forces us to face some incendiary questions about race, redemption, privacy, trust, perception and prejudice, all the while showing us that things may not be as simple or clear cut as they seem. The picture's superb script, fine film editing and excellent ensemble cast (most notably Octavia Spencer, Naomi Watts and Kelvin Harrison Jr.) make for one of the best offerings of 2019, a release that sincerely deserves serious consideration come awards season. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
9
katezoeNov 13, 2019
Trump’s toxic America, has turned race, privilege, and class into incendiary topics while amplifying intolerance. The powerfully constructed “Luce,” mixes all these socio-political subjects into a provocative Molotov cocktail that shatters,Trump’s toxic America, has turned race, privilege, and class into incendiary topics while amplifying intolerance. The powerfully constructed “Luce,” mixes all these socio-political subjects into a provocative Molotov cocktail that shatters, burns and leaves no easy answers. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
PurpleCrayon4UOct 24, 2019
EVERYTHING HAS A HIDDEN MEANING .. Everyone has a hidden agenda. The characters portrayed are not who they appear to be. LUCE is a good film, worthy of your time. LUCE is not OSCAR material under any category, but the performances are aboveEVERYTHING HAS A HIDDEN MEANING .. Everyone has a hidden agenda. The characters portrayed are not who they appear to be. LUCE is a good film, worthy of your time. LUCE is not OSCAR material under any category, but the performances are above average. At the conclusion of LUCE, you will understand that EVERYONE LIES and EVERYTHING IS A LIE. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
ganonymousNov 16, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It was pretty entertaining to watch the the tug of war between Luce and his teacher. His teacher didn't seem to like Luce because he came from a white privileged family and he was good student good at alot of things around school. And i think she wished she had this kind of lifestyle when she was in school but she wasn't so lucky. So she decides to try to sabotage Luce's picture perfect image by doing things to uncover some not so nice things that Luce did that he wanted to keep private. And Luce starts to notice this and starts to aggravated with his teacher and starts to find out things about her life and starts to bring the to the light as well. Then the tug of war begins. And Luce eventually comes away the victor. Especially when his teacher's mentally ill sister has mental breakdown for the school to see. And usually say certain graphic scenes aren't needed in most movies i review but feel this was one was because it's when the storyline start to shift and became more intense. And i have to give credit to the actress for shooting a scene like that because know it most have been tough especially being around such great actors actresses on this movie. But she did good job and gave the emotion that that difficult scene need she a good actress i like alot of movies she is in. But Luce became the victor when his teacher was removed from the school. But Luce is still not as perfect as his image portrays. So that why was wondering what the message of the movie was supposed to be. But it still was a pretty good movie Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
3
LetoAtreides82Jul 4, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The acting was great but the story is bad. By the end the force of good and there's only one good person in the movie loses out to the forces of evil. If you're evil you'd probably enjoy this movie. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
aydge89Nov 1, 2019
A real shame this one has flown under the radar. It's a great script and well acted. Very thought provoking. This is a movie that embraces the ambiguities and complexities of 2019 and doesn't offer easy answers. Easily the best movie of 2019 so far.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
DeanomiteJan 10, 2020
This was a great movie. What struck me most is that how people act is connected to how they are treated, especially in the context of defending themselves. Trust is hard to come by and more rare all the time. What value is family when theyThis was a great movie. What struck me most is that how people act is connected to how they are treated, especially in the context of defending themselves. Trust is hard to come by and more rare all the time. What value is family when they turn against themselves at the first opportunity? I have read that family is not really based on trust and loyalty but on a hierarchy of mutual deceit, a Machiavellian structure in synecdoche of the larger society. That is a subject that could be interesting, a sort of film noir based on family dynamics, in the spirit of Brick. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
JLuis_001Sep 2, 2019
No gadgets, no ornaments of any kind. A really solid drama driven entirely by the good story and the good work of its actors. I was actually quite surprised.

It gets lost a little towards the end and the ending doesn't close tightly but
No gadgets, no ornaments of any kind. A really solid drama driven entirely by the good story and the good work of its actors. I was actually quite surprised.

It gets lost a little towards the end and the ending doesn't close tightly but still kept me totally focused and I did enjoyed it.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
amheretojudgeAug 27, 2019
Not for a single moment does the film turns into a preaching-to-the-choir tone, and that is its biggest achievement.

Luce Onah's political film isn't exactly political. If anything it is a thriller. And that's what I loved the most about
Not for a single moment does the film turns into a preaching-to-the-choir tone, and that is its biggest achievement.

Luce

Onah's political film isn't exactly political. If anything it is a thriller. And that's what I loved the most about the film than any other theme or twist or trick it showcases. The co-writer and director Juilius Onah and the play by J.C. Lee- who also co-wrote the screenplay- from which it is adapted, eventually has a political film to endorse about. But that's as far as it would go. The debates, the ideologies or the profound theories are definitely circling around these sensitive subjects, but for the most part of the film, it is all a distraction. The actual heart of these arguments lie on the arrogance of these incredibly smart character on not bowing down to each other's theories.

And from this spirals out a tug-of-war where step after step both of them (Octavia Spencer and Kelvin Harrison Jr.) are trying to outsmart each other. I cannot help myself but compare these throbbing philosophical and provoking arguments to Christopher Nolan's The Prestige and its take on fame, art and sacrifice. Spence and Harrison Jr. from the very beginning are tangled into unfathomable circumstances giving them an excuse of a specific perspective that acts as a double edged sword for both of them.

Their denial isn't what's lagging or stretching this juicy case but is what's making it fun, entertaining and engaging. And this is the brilliance of the narration, What could have easily comes off as a pretentious or tedious detour, is instead smoothly spicing up this political drama. Tim Roth and Naomi Watts too are integrating the performance scale to a whole new level. Just watch them all sit in a room and greet each other, in the last act of the film, the tension cuts across their ability to harness a single good intention in this meeting where they gather to talk about Luce.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
Mauro_LanariFeb 20, 2023
(Mauro Lanari)
Even in culture, art and cinema there is a difference between local and global themes: I consider the first to be nationalisms, neocolonialisms, neoimperalisms. For example, why should I be interested in everything that happens
(Mauro Lanari)
Even in culture, art and cinema there is a difference between local and global themes: I consider the first to be nationalisms, neocolonialisms, neoimperalisms. For example, why should I be interested in everything that happens in the United States when some of the phenomena denounced are exclusive to them? Why should I be interested in the account of all forms of social conflict or racial issue if they are not interchangeable but follow different causal dynamics from country to country? Why should I endorse the synecdoche that any particular problem would have general value? Why should I care about Hollywood's eternal self-reflection on itself? What happened to reasoning on universal topics? Why should I be surprised and saddened if these acclaimed indie products are box office flops?
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
moaltaAug 29, 2019
Incredible writing and acting. Most thought-provoking movie I have seen in the last year.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews