Read Mixed User Reviews for London Has Fallen

4

SeanVincentMay 15, 2016

The film is just another generic action film with wasted talents. Plot is a mess,action might be okay but the sheer number of action films that I've seen in recent years are better than this pile of turd.With a great and talented cast whichThe film is just another generic action film with wasted talents. Plot is a mess,action might be okay but the sheer number of action films that I've seen in recent years are better than this pile of turd.With a great and talented cast which again was wasted because of how horrible the film was equip with terrible action set pieces,the film didn't live up to it's predecessor because the movie takes place in a huge city rather than just one building,the film did nothing original just another generic action film that no one wants.… Expand

5 of 6 users found this helpful51

All this user's reviews

4

csw12Apr 13, 2016

London has Fallen is loud, lazy and cheap looking. It takes a serious issue, something the critics don't won't to address, and turns it into a video game.

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

5

TheApplegnomeJun 14, 2016

A failed attempt to reproduce the “somewhat” glamour-ish ‘Olympus Has fallen’, but failed with originality, character depth and basic storytelling. It’s a big action-sequel but it doesn’t have the thrills nor the breathtaking aspects that’sA failed attempt to reproduce the “somewhat” glamour-ish ‘Olympus Has fallen’, but failed with originality, character depth and basic storytelling. It’s a big action-sequel but it doesn’t have the thrills nor the breathtaking aspects that’s supposed to define the genre. Add non-existing & despicable characters; well that’s ‘London Has Fallen’. The whole flick is about the fast plot and plot only, which is fun for some individuals but meh for others, and the structure of the film is one big mess with expositions and predictability all over the place. The actors though. Damn great! But what a waste of their careers. Another film with destruction of famous landmarks, but it’s a fast-paced and somewhat enjoyable (but messy) ride.

Personal rating: 50/100
Critical rating: 37/100… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

5

Q8MarrongGlaceMay 17, 2016

Good cast and acting with a common action movie plot , I would probably give it a 6 as I did for Olympus Has Fallen 2013 rate it 6 to me 6 is a not bad score from my point of view watchable movies started with 5 up . below 5 if you like toGood cast and acting with a common action movie plot , I would probably give it a 6 as I did for Olympus Has Fallen 2013 rate it 6 to me 6 is a not bad score from my point of view watchable movies started with 5 up . below 5 if you like to kill some time movies , The reason I give this 5 because of it's bad special and visual effects failure I know its so poor and some scene looks like a game but I can't just take out more than 1 score for that and totally forget about the movie so there you have it . Please rate a movie wisely some users don't do 2 to 9 they only rate 1 for bad and 10 for good that's why we get fooled by most of that high rated movies and the same of very low rated movies that actually deserves more points !… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

4

MayankkumarMar 8, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. i watched this last night.. and i am going to talk about story or do spoilers...
I was expecting something very great but i get nothing... if i will talk from the start, movie was okay but when the blast happened and effects where that bad that you can easily judge it.. story was OK. effect was worst literally worst, story line was bad. movie can't hold you till the end may be your expectation will do..

i was hoping for something good but i get nothing.. while watching HOMELAND series came to my mind because of Drone and all.. **** from the start they showed drone so i was expecting very awesome things.. i gave 4 stars because of actors hard work.. don't go with any kinda expectations, just watch it.. and if you're expecting like the previous once then please don't watch it. Review by Mayank @itsbymayank and ya the last bomb blast was real thank you maybe… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

6

quincytheodoreMar 5, 2016

Rather implausible and predictable, but the bullets and knives rip mercilessly enough for visceral action delight.

From the previous title, or even this title, audience would have a clear idea of what's promised here. It's "save theRather implausible and predictable, but the bullets and knives rip mercilessly enough for visceral action delight.

From the previous title, or even this title, audience would have a clear idea of what's promised here. It's "save the president" themed action movie, sets in London. There are famous names actors to elevate the story, but it should be no surprise that the drama portion is average. They do succeed on advancing the action into full blown combat spectacle from continuous shoot-out and rapid brutal slashing.

Benjamin Asher (Aaron Eckhart), the president of USA, has an obligation to attend the funeral of British Prime Minister. Along with his trusty bodyguard and soon-to-be part time dad, Mike Banning (Gerard Butler) he embarks in the trip, and as we all know it, London is eventually hit with terrorist attack. The story is plain it operates on a strict linear motion with barely any twist at all even though it has actors who worked on this genre before.

The main idea is the same patriotism and duty-bound motive, which is arguably worked slightly better than the predecessor, but it often becomes too flat in delivery. Some of the scenes feel too forced to create tension and it ends up too cliché in the process. Script doesn't produce any solid interaction as it relies on too much on misguided bravado and the comedy aspect only works partially. Furthermore, the intended twist is far from effective since it doesn't develop nicely, if any at all.

Fortunately, this is a definite step up action-wise. Chase scenes, melee brawls and gun fights are far more intense and better choreographed. It has the luxury of great continuous shots action in no shortage of speed and impact, almost similar to video game sequences. There's also the addition of CG for large scale attack, understandable since they have to present actual London under siege, though it's inferior to the psychical combat counterpart.

"London Has Fallen" is miles from the predecessor in term of action, but it might not be an appealing visit for those wanting complex narrative.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

5

MattBrady99Mar 6, 2016

London Has Fallen is a dumb action movie with no story or any development, and that's what I was expecting going in and that's what I got. I would be lying if I said I didn't enjoy myself watching this movie, because I did (for what it is).London Has Fallen is a dumb action movie with no story or any development, and that's what I was expecting going in and that's what I got. I would be lying if I said I didn't enjoy myself watching this movie, because I did (for what it is). There were a few good actions scenes that was pretty well done and Gerard Butler makes for an enjoyable lead. I know this movie isn't suppose to be taken too seriously, because you would look like a right fool if you take any of this movie serious, but i can't pretend or act like i don't see the major flaws in this movie. I think the biggest thing that really hurt this movie is the noticeable CGI, which is absolutely awful and looks completely unfinished. Aaron Eckhart basically plays the male version of a damsel in distress and Jackie Earle Haley doesn't even do anything in this film.

Overall, if you want a movie that's non-stop action and doesn't make any sense at all, but you want to have a good time, then London Has Fallen is the movie for you.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

5

NightReviewsAug 23, 2016

Action movies, regardless of their explicit intent or savage coincidences, always tend to be a blend of entertainment, and implicitly, a political mine-field waiting to be criticized for its portrayal of the bad guys. Bad guys, no matter howAction movies, regardless of their explicit intent or savage coincidences, always tend to be a blend of entertainment, and implicitly, a political mine-field waiting to be criticized for its portrayal of the bad guys. Bad guys, no matter how hard you try to justify them, are always the main concern and heavily scrutinized subject of many critics and talks within action movies. Now, after 2013’s obsession with White House abduction movies, White House Down and the original Olympus Has Fallen, which spawned our currently reviewed London Has Fallen, its hard not to be political when the main players in the film are today’s world leaders.

In 2013, London’s predecessor Olympus Has Fallen showed a very political situation of a North Korean terrorist trying to unify Korea by capturing the American President, and using it as leverage to remove American opposition in North Korea for a South Korean invasion. While London Has Fallen does not have as much of a very intellectual plot as its original, one thing is for sure, the action, language and kick-ass Mike Banning (Gerard Butler) are amped up to mirror signature John McClane moments, but never ever quite passes them.

London Has Fallen is a less thought-out actioner, yet, the film tries to out-do its predecessor’s actions, with a smaller budget, which never boasts well for action movies. Usually, when studios give a smaller budget to sequels, their faith in the subject matter is not very convincing. Yet, London Has Fallen is a more aggressive, solid action film that Olympus on many levels, and perhaps thats because of the cast and crew’s fun with the material, rather than a serious tone found in the first film.

Rugged with grit and braun, London Has Fallen is easily a fun and mindless action movie for die-hard action movie fans, as well as passive fanfare for casual action fans to the genre as well. Filled with ridiculous one-liners, sometimes really animated and disgraceful action special effects and some serious contemplative moments of justification and reveal, London Has Fallen is the perfect post-Oscar action movie to cozy up to for the month of March.

As mentioned above, Olympus was a much more plot-heavy and politically savvy action film, while London is nothing short of a revenge film. But who is to say revenge films are bad? Anyone remember Kill Bill or Mad Max: Fury Road?

The baddie this time, Aamir Barkawi (Alon Aboutboul) is a arms-dealing terrorist, arming any nation or any one body, with deep enough pockets, with weapons that could take out some of the world largest and longest standing national landmarks. When his dealings get him directly entangled with the interests of the United States, the United States military orders a drone strike attack on Aamir and his family. Of course, to amp up the melodrama and emotions, despite all of the intelligence of the United States government, the day of the strike is the same day as Aamir’s youngest daughter’s wedding. Barely escaping the bombing of the United States, Aamir and his son Kamran Barkawi (Waleed Zuaiter) spend two long, hard year, devising a plan that will get their revenge and debt in blood.

Upon the news of the sudden death of the British Prime Minister, President Benjamin Asher (Aaron Eckhart) along with his top personal Secret Service Agent Banning, make their way to the UK for a highly publicized funeral for the former Prime Minister. Gathering some of the biggest leaders in the world, Barkawi’s plans being to unfold, trapping leaders, bombing landmarks and killing off thousands of people, including innocent civilians, in an attempt to capturing the leader of the free world, and globally broadcasting his execution. Banning, whose steps ahead of every nations top security outlets, goes above and beyond his duties, not informing a single soul of the President’s movements and plans. His quick decisions saves the President for as long as he can, until he in inevitably captured and planned to be publicly executed for fear propaganda.

Some of the most interesting parts of London Has Fallen aren’t even within the scenes of the film, but facts surrounding the film as a whole make for one interesting little pop culture entry. Olympus, which was directed by American go-to action director Antoine Fuqua (Southpaw and The Equalizer) dropped out of the sequel, and was replaced, surprisingly by Iranian born filmmaker Babak Najafi, the man behind the Easy Money sequel and Berlin Film Festival darling Sebbe. What’s truly surprising with London is the studio’s confidence in an International director taking the reigns of a quite heavy Pro-America action film, one that has no problem showcasing the always tacky shots of the tattered American flag victoriously whisking in the wind over a sunrise or sunset.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

4

RobBob99Nov 17, 2016

Is Gerald Butler a badass? Sure he is. Is it enough to save this entire movie? Nope. Other than a cool tracking shot in the third act, London Has Fallen is an overall idiotic movie. I understand it's meant to be over the top and a throw backIs Gerald Butler a badass? Sure he is. Is it enough to save this entire movie? Nope. Other than a cool tracking shot in the third act, London Has Fallen is an overall idiotic movie. I understand it's meant to be over the top and a throw back to classic 80s action films but it was style over substance through and through.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

4

MrAlexWildMar 11, 2016

The only reason this got a good score is because of Mr freeman, I think personally its silly and childish, One man places the SAS secondary to himself and takes on a whole building... No I don't think so. Not quite hit it this time i'm afraid.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

GyrushoMay 31, 2016

Decent movie where Gerald Butler is portrayed as the fighter/defender in which he shines. The plot was pretty straight forward but nevertheless was it catchy enough to stay in the story. You can expect some decent action throughout the movieDecent movie where Gerald Butler is portrayed as the fighter/defender in which he shines. The plot was pretty straight forward but nevertheless was it catchy enough to stay in the story. You can expect some decent action throughout the movie which keeps you hooked but don't expect to much of a plot, which was in my eyes decided and "revealed" in the first 10 minutes.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

TheQuietGamerSep 13, 2016

It's the type of movie you watch just to see people get shot and stuff get blown up. So don't expect things like intelligence or even originality. What you can expect is a whole lot of American, anti-terrorism pride. The kind anyone who lovesIt's the type of movie you watch just to see people get shot and stuff get blown up. So don't expect things like intelligence or even originality. What you can expect is a whole lot of American, anti-terrorism pride. The kind anyone who loves this country can cheer for, but still be a little embarrassed about around non-Americans. All in all though it's decent patriotism porn.

And at the end of the day the action is just fun. The special effects might scream budget action movie, but when the bullets are flying and buildings are popping it's hard to care. It's also a surprisingly brutal movie. There are a few scenes where it really doesn't pull any punches and gets graphics with it's depiction of things like torture. Almost to the point of sadism.

The plot is nothing more than an excuse to get all the mayhem started. The terrorists are doing, you know, terrorist stuff and Gerard Butler is acting as a one man army on a rampage to save the president because you don't mess with the USA. I can put up with all that. I'm only here for the violence anyway. It's just a shame I have to listen to the dialog though. Oh, and every character but the one Butler is playing is an idiot.

Seriously though, this dialog sucks. The characters just say dumb stuff. When it tries to get all emotional and dramatic on us, it's just too cheesy and cliché to buy into. Not too mention a lot of these actors just aren't up to par with likes of Morgan Freeman. Seriously what is he doing in a movie like this? The guy deserves better than his recent run of films.

So if you haven't picked up on this yet, what I'm saying is show up for the boom boom and nothing else. This isn't high art and certainly isn't intelligent. Yet, I can't say I wasn't entertained. I liked the not so good looking action and it got my inner patriot cheering for another win for America. I'd be embarrassed to show it to my non-American friends or the ones who demand a little more thoughtfulness from their movies. When it comes down to it though, it's disposable, mindless entertainment. A reminder that these colors don't run, that can be some stupid fun.

6.6/10… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

TyranianApr 12, 2019

Not terrible but unless you love Gerard Butler you won't find much to like in this film.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

5

EludiumQ36Sep 10, 2016

This film by a second-film director runs hot and cold. Sometimes you're on the edge of your seat, other times you're throwing popcorn at the screen. The central characters just aren't cast well either. Aaron Eckhart as a gun-slingingThis film by a second-film director runs hot and cold. Sometimes you're on the edge of your seat, other times you're throwing popcorn at the screen. The central characters just aren't cast well either. Aaron Eckhart as a gun-slinging president is a bit too much, and why? We've had a black president for 7 yrs now, why not cast a black guy for the part? And Gerard Butler was great as King Leonidas in "300" but is so many kinds of wrong as head of the presidential security detail. Then there's the whole premise as to how ANY organization could plot such a sophisticated takedown of London without being found out makes you wonder how this film ever got the green light and funding. You know why? Because of the platform it gives us to tell the terrorists to bite the big one. There were several moments belonging to Gerard's character and Aaron's that were devoted to telling the terrorists to GTH. And that's the whole point of the film so that's why it was made and why you watch.… Expand