Read User Reviews and Submit your own for Last Knights

6

quincytheodoreApr 4, 2015

With distinct visual style Last Knights is a decent light fantasy flick, although the narrative might feel too familiar and slow. It's odd that a medieval fantasy movie with respectable cast nearly flies off radar. Last Knights is not an epicWith distinct visual style Last Knights is a decent light fantasy flick, although the narrative might feel too familiar and slow. It's odd that a medieval fantasy movie with respectable cast nearly flies off radar. Last Knights is not an epic tale, in fact the plot heavily resembles that of 47 Ronin and considering even Keanu Reeves' journey is inspired by multitude of per-existing works, this plot is unoriginal at best. The pacing is slow, creating a rather bloated runtime. Still, the cast as well as cinematography produce nice atmosphere, especially in latter half, just making Last Knights a moderately enjoyable popcorn flick.

Raiden (Clive Owen) is a commander with a dark past, he was taken by his lord Bartok (Morgan Freeman) and granted opportunity to lead the knights. As a man of integrity Bartok openly opposes Minister Gezza Mott (Aksel Hennie), this doesn't end up well for him as he loses his land and riches, amongst other things. Thus the tale of coping and possible vengeance begins. The premise is far too predictable, more so if you have watched 47 Ronin, the screenplay almost mirrors one another.

Clive Owen has the rugged commander look, but he doesn't seem engaging. I can't help but seeing the solemn Keanu Reeves' persona as neither of them barely exhibits any meaningful expression. Morgan Freeman is as dependable as ever, he's charismatic and does pretty much what one expected. As for the villain, Aksel Hennie performs admirably. He does seem corrupt, conniving and slightly paranoid. The script gives him ominous vibe that audience would love to hate.

Supporting cast is oriented towards the mix of European and Asian, props for the casting department to pull off the eclectic assemble. They also have some experience in action movies and TV shows overall, so it’s not all obscure faces. The setting puts emphasis on hybrid culture, architectures and costumes appear to be from ancient Persia with an oriental touch. It's a quaint atmosphere and presents a few lavish set pieces. Cinematography uses grayish filter for most of these areas and outfits, in exception of certain characters or definitive environment which are more vibrant.

While it looks presentable, the plot may deter some audiences. Its script tries to engage with intriguing lines, and it's mildly successful. Unfortunately, the film spends more than half of its runtime stuttering to find its rhythm. This is made worse by the outdated screenplay, the plot devices are not only foreseeable, they are also heavy-handed in execution.

The last act fares better as it offers more polished action sequences, although there is no surprise twist to be had here. Last Knights is made from tired elements of the genres, it doesn't do enough for a fascinating spectacle. However, with a presentable graphic and production design, it’s barely sufficient for a light watch.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

7

byno1985Apr 5, 2015

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Don't listen to the critics. They is one of those instanced where they bash an action move because they feel there is no art there. *Spoiler* This movie is another re-imagining of the Japanese historical event/legend of the 47 ronin. The legend is supposed to be a an account of when 47 ronin waited and plotted a year in order to get revenge for there daimyo (feudal lord) when he was compelled to commit seppuku (ritual suicide) for assaulting a court official. The story is supposed to example of the samurai code of honer. The movie stayed true to the techniques they used to deceive the court official who they planned to kill but its a bit awkward in the setting of knights and Clive Owen. They also didn't change what the call the Emperor when they decided to used knights, so you have an Emperor instead of a king. Overall a good movie with good acting. It has good action as well but its more about the story that the fighting. If you love the story of the 47 ronin(not the **** Keanu Reeves movie) you will like this movie.… Expand

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

9

juliasharinMay 18, 2015

In my opinion it was a good movie for me its been a while since The Last Samurai that I have enjoyed the intensity of a code of honor type of movie. I love Clive Owen and Morgan Freeman. To the critics I cant write on the different aspects anIn my opinion it was a good movie for me its been a while since The Last Samurai that I have enjoyed the intensity of a code of honor type of movie. I love Clive Owen and Morgan Freeman. To the critics I cant write on the different aspects an expert looks at in reviewing a movie but as a fan of the movies I have a particular interest in certain types of movies and The Last Knight is one of them. Clive Owen is so good looking and the seriousness of his expressions are amazing. Morgan Freeman has taken on roles that he carries so well. thank you to the crew and cast who made this movie for people like me.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful10

All this user's reviews

9

ColdlucidityApr 3, 2015

Fighting for Honor and doing the right thing regardless, great movie. I would recommend you ignore the critics and give this movie a go, 27 overall? You've got to be **** me.

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

10

lilkillpappyMay 9, 2015

I like this film very much. The critics are really showing their pretentiousness with this one. They are incapable of enjoying a film that is simply entertaining. The visual style of the film is great, the look and feel of the characters isI like this film very much. The critics are really showing their pretentiousness with this one. They are incapable of enjoying a film that is simply entertaining. The visual style of the film is great, the look and feel of the characters is unique, the action is beautiful and fluid, the acting is solid, and the revenge plot is always satisfying especially when you throw in some unpredictability. I think we have a cult hit. I feel sorry for the critics that couldn't enjoy it, because there is a lot of entertainment value here.… Expand

4 of 6 users found this helpful42

All this user's reviews

10

witdocApr 10, 2015

For someone that's hard to keep seated during a movie, it kept me seated and very interested. The plot kept me wondering about the main character, I kept wondering what he was about. Near the end I found that I was relieved and pleased. IFor someone that's hard to keep seated during a movie, it kept me seated and very interested. The plot kept me wondering about the main character, I kept wondering what he was about. Near the end I found that I was relieved and pleased. I thought it a very good movie. I think critics spend too much time comparing one movie against another, or past movies. Today finding a sparkling new twist to a story that may have been told before may not always have a new twist just a human experience to be told. I'm a forever SciFi lover, I rarely find movies today that peak my interest, thought all of the comic book scifi is not to my liking. Look up the word epic, I think it falls in that description. Well, since I don't really watch a lot of medieval movies, and not many to "compare with" I thought it very good!… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

10

faithmariaApr 21, 2015

I thought this movie is very good. The character of Clive Owen makes the movie worth watching. It is very well executed. An action movie that gently touches one's heart. We've cried watching the movie towards the end, leaving the virtue ofI thought this movie is very good. The character of Clive Owen makes the movie worth watching. It is very well executed. An action movie that gently touches one's heart. We've cried watching the movie towards the end, leaving the virtue of honor, dignity, and integrity. Overall, I was very impressed.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

8

TheRealViewApr 6, 2015

Don't listen to the career critics. This movie is well worth the watch. Clive Owen gives a good genuine performance and Morgan Freeman makes the most of his time on the screen. Something we have never seen before is multiculturalism inDon't listen to the career critics. This movie is well worth the watch. Clive Owen gives a good genuine performance and Morgan Freeman makes the most of his time on the screen. Something we have never seen before is multiculturalism in medieval movies. This new representation on this genre is played out very believably by the supporting casts and you can't help but to want to see more.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

MadCat6669Apr 12, 2015

Its a good but not perfect "westernized" adaptation of the story of the 47 ronin, The acting by the main characters is a bit bland, but it doesn't hurt the movie, the action sequences are done well.... A recommended watch for sword action fans.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

8

CanisrahJun 7, 2015

I approached this film with low expectations given the dismal critic score it received. What I saw was an exciting and at times inspiring story which had me hooked and eager to see how things played out.

You can tell this is a WesternisedI approached this film with low expectations given the dismal critic score it received. What I saw was an exciting and at times inspiring story which had me hooked and eager to see how things played out.

You can tell this is a Westernised version of a story set in feudal Japan - the context would make perfect sense where it in the Samurai genre. Transplanting it to a fantasy setting takes some getting used too but it does work. One thing I did think the film failed on was an attempt to bow to modern notions of multiculturalism - it doesn't quite work and comes off jarring.

But beyond that - there's a lot about this movie that inner city trendy, social justice warrior, feminist film critics will hate; it is unashamedly masculine in the traditional sense of the term, in all the ways that third wave feminism is trying so desperately to kill. The film extols male virtues of strength, honor and loyalty. There's no sign of a female warrior character implausibly mincing it with the men - the female characters adopt more traditional roles - as damsels to be rescued or wives awaiting the coming of their husbands. If they had done the film in a feudal Japanese setting it would be OK because it's historically accurate, but in a fantasy setting the film makers are expected to adhere to the new religious dogma of feminist revisionism and they didn't - so the wimpy career critics have savaged it accordingly.

It's not a perfect film - but it's a good one with a strong cast and a great story. A trifle predictable, but in the most satisfying way.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

gamerzxDec 28, 2017

Surprisingly good plot twist. I enjoyed the movie. It could have been part of a series. It is in a fantasy setting . Very little backstory. After finding the time to watch it the plot twist took me by total surprise.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

3

Hallow_99Jun 8, 2015

How people can say that it's a good movie? Maybe it's not awful, but it's bad. When I sarted to watch it, I thought: "Well, it's gonna be a well-made medieval epic movie...", and the film said: "F*%k you, the man-who-is-watching-me! I'm gonnaHow people can say that it's a good movie? Maybe it's not awful, but it's bad. When I sarted to watch it, I thought: "Well, it's gonna be a well-made medieval epic movie...", and the film said: "F*%k you, the man-who-is-watching-me! I'm gonna be a political drama with a little bit asian epic film-style action!"... the biggest disappointment of the year.… Expand

0 of 6 users found this helpful06

All this user's reviews

9

Costs1129Jun 17, 2015

Don't know why the critics are so hard on this one. Yes Morgan feels like he phoned it in. Otherwise, it was a fairly good movie. It was refreshing to see a westernized take on the extreme honour system. The mix of styles was fun too.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

LyciusJan 30, 2017

This movie was better than 47 Ronin by far. The costuming, choreography, visuals, acting, and sound were all superb. Was this an Oscar caliber film? No. It was a very entertaining movie.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

10

Marinela12Jun 29, 2018

Hello, I sign up just to write a review for this movie. I will start by saying that I have watched this movie at least 5 times and each time it left me emotional and brought tears to my eyes. Amazing work from every actor. I have not watchedHello, I sign up just to write a review for this movie. I will start by saying that I have watched this movie at least 5 times and each time it left me emotional and brought tears to my eyes. Amazing work from every actor. I have not watched a bad movie of Morgan Freeman yet. Clive Owen is absolutely phenomenal !
This movie reminds me of the first life values my grandfather thought me, honor, respect, devotion, loyalty and pride. This is a very inspirational movie and we should watch it when we feel confused about ourselves. I understand how some people cannot be moved or comprehend by the deepnest of this movie, perhaps due to environment superficiality they surround themselves with. "Honor is something that all men are born with. It cannot be taken from you nor can it be granted. It must only not be lost."… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

6

LeZeeMay 23, 2016

When the knights rise after the fall of their master.

I had a feeling that I know this story from somewhere else like a deja-vu, but more than that I felt it should have been a ninja story than the knight's. So when I checked the crew listWhen the knights rise after the fall of their master.

I had a feeling that I know this story from somewhere else like a deja-vu, but more than that I felt it should have been a ninja story than the knight's. So when I checked the crew list and I found the Japanese director who made 'Goemon'. That's not at all, it was indeed a version of the Japanese classical hit 'The Loyal 47 Ronin'. Honestly, I haven't seen that, but have seen the other versions like the Keanu Reeve's recent '47 Ronon' et cetera.

It was the story of a group of knights led by Raiden played by Clive Owen. After their master was tricked to death by a corrupted minister in the court of law, everyone thinks the knights would avenge for it. But that does not happen and as the years pass, slowly the hope fades away. And then comes a twist with some good action sequences before the end credits roll up.

It was a great story, but the transforming it from a ninja tale to a knight's did not give that solid revenge seeking effect. Because the ninja fights are kind of stylish, because the stunt choreography and costumes for ninjas has changed in the present scenario. Whereas the knight's remained same for the decades, that means it was a very normal like a medieval European sword fight. So you can call it a realistic, yet there's a filmy thing which lacks in it.

That's fine because the entire film was almost a slow drama. So don't assume it is a complete action film. In that perspective, it will definitely disappoint a few viewers, but I think it is still worth giving a try. The cast and the production were awesome, but still there's something is holding back it to the B movies list than an A. And finally, seeing the way it ended, I think there will be another film to follow.

6/10… Expand