Lady in the Water

7

DanN.Jul 31, 2006

Contrary to most of the media critics on here I actually enjoyed the movie. Part of the problem is that in the previews it was billed as a scary movie which it certainly is not. It's more fantasy than anything and should be viewed as Contrary to most of the media critics on here I actually enjoyed the movie. Part of the problem is that in the previews it was billed as a scary movie which it certainly is not. It's more fantasy than anything and should be viewed as such. Just relax and watch a decent bedtime story.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

PopR.Jul 31, 2006

If this movie was made by Sofia coppola or Spielberg without changing anything Critics would give an excelent review to Lady, but their critics are about Night Shyamalan not about the movie, therefore his movies are not made for they, are If this movie was made by Sofia coppola or Spielberg without changing anything Critics would give an excelent review to Lady, but their critics are about Night Shyamalan not about the movie, therefore his movies are not made for they, are made for us, the common public who without prejudices only go to the theaters to enjoy a fantastic and original tale. Remember he ( Night ) gave us the best performances of Bruce willis, Mel gibson, Holey joel osment and Bryce dallas...etc.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

JohnC.Jul 31, 2006

A very good film. Ive read many reviews by closedminded people who apparently did not see the film for what it is. Paul Giamatti is definitly in the running for Best Actor with a stellar performance. The reason I believe some critic are A very good film. Ive read many reviews by closedminded people who apparently did not see the film for what it is. Paul Giamatti is definitly in the running for Best Actor with a stellar performance. The reason I believe some critic are giving film lower marks is because it is made by Shamalan, and it did not live up to what they expected. It could have had a few things dont differently but all and all it is a pretty solid film. The bottotm line is go see the film, but do not go in expecting anything. And take the film as its giving, and hopefully you will see it the way I did and enjoy it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

MarkD.Jul 31, 2006

Better than reviews! Snobby movie critic probably made most critics angry and snipey.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

SarahB.Jul 31, 2006

Being a fan of Shyamalan I couldn't wait for this movie to come out. I believe he did not disappoint. One thing with M. Night that I love is that you have to get past the "horror" in his movies and look for the deaper meaning and Being a fan of Shyamalan I couldn't wait for this movie to come out. I believe he did not disappoint. One thing with M. Night that I love is that you have to get past the "horror" in his movies and look for the deaper meaning and intricate story. I thought "Ladyin the Water" was his most spectacular attempt in story telling, as beautiful stories go. I loved the symbolism, the humor, the suprise. It was Shyamalan and I loved it! Perhaps I'm biased, but I think everyone should give this one a try.… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

8

BitBurnJul 30, 2006

This was, yet, another strong picture by M.Night and yes its right up there with Sixth Sense, Signs and The Village. A matter of fact, the movie was exactly what I come to expect from M.Night and I mean this in a good way. Yes, he uses the This was, yet, another strong picture by M.Night and yes its right up there with Sixth Sense, Signs and The Village. A matter of fact, the movie was exactly what I come to expect from M.Night and I mean this in a good way. Yes, he uses the same twists and spookiness as usual and this is possibly why he was booed by Hollywood critics but, come on, the guy has nothing to prove here. His recipe works, just like a Big Mac, and that's why we like it so much!… Expand

1 of 1 users found this helpful

10

AaronA.Jul 29, 2006

Tremendous film. The critics missed the point entirely.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

JustinS.Jul 29, 2006

I did enjoy this movie. Surely it wasn't my favorite M. Night Shyamalan film; I daresay my least favorite. Still, I think the horrid reviews it has received have gone overboard. I do think a lot of the negative critiques are valid. I did enjoy this movie. Surely it wasn't my favorite M. Night Shyamalan film; I daresay my least favorite. Still, I think the horrid reviews it has received have gone overboard. I do think a lot of the negative critiques are valid. There's a LOT of holes in it. While there is an outstanding cast in "Lady", there are many unneeded characters. I found it especially odd that the tenants in "The Cove" who were least helpful to the Lady's cause were given the most screentime, and as a result came off as more heroic than the actual suppossed heroes. And, to finish with my own negative critiques, I had difficulty seeing what the overall message was that the animals wanted the human vessels to hear. The majority of critiques I've read of the film pay particular attention to the arrogance of Shyamalan shown through the film. While I have read a number of articles that point to a definite ego and insularity the filmmaker is unfortunately guilty of, I think many of the critics comments are unwarranted. First off (and I'd say most importantly to note), Shyamalan didn't depict himself as a "hero whose writing would change the world in the future." Yes, his character is promised this fate in the film. But the character is a social/political commentary. He's not making movies. He's actually cast off as quite humble, though a bit of a smart ass to his sister. He doesn't seem to take himself to seriously at first, but rather just wants to get down in writing a few ideas of what he sees as wrong in America. Shyamalan, unless I'm REALLY missing something, has (aside from the Village, perhaps my favorite of his films) never had political commentaries in his films. I don't even know what his political beliefs are. "Lady in the Water" never reveals the particular characters beliefs, thus saving it from being overly partisan. I also do not think the films depiction of "critics" should be taken THAT seriously...though the critics I've read thus fart, particularly Roger Ebert (my personal favorite) show an enormity of sympathy for Mr. Farber (played hilariously by Bob Balaban). Yes, Mr. Farber is an isolated, antisocial literary and film prick who thinks he has the concept of story mastered. And yes, Shyamalan probably was trying to send a sort of pre-emptive strike against the films inevitable cultured despisers. Still, Mr. Farber's main flaw wasn't the very fact that he was a critic, or even that he was arrogant about it. In his own odd way he was quite helpful to the quest and the Lady. Rather, his fault was the isolated life he chose to live. He shows no interest at all in his neighbors, is grumpy, and is totally unapproachable. Worst of all, he has no love for stories any longer. His approach to critiquing them and his social behavior destroys any passion he may have once had for the stories that connect people together. I think this is a sin many critics are often guilty of, and I'm glad to see it in a movie. The films biggest fault in its depiction of him (and criticism in general) is the disturbing way his death is shown, and the untactfull comic relief incorporated in it. Yes, Lady in the Water was pretty silly. But it was, I must admit, very fun to watch. It was refreshing to be brought back to to the world of fairy tales, albeit imperfectly. And even if the film doesn't change the world (and I'm pretty sure it won't), it at least brought us back a certain "childlike spirit" in reviving good ol' fashion "Big Bad Wolf" stories that many of us miss .… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

ChadS.Jul 29, 2006

"The Lady in the Water" plays like a wet dream for people who indulge in role-playing games like Dungeons and Dragons. How all the tenants readily accept their roles without even a shred of initial skepticism just doesn't work because "The Lady in the Water" plays like a wet dream for people who indulge in role-playing games like Dungeons and Dragons. How all the tenants readily accept their roles without even a shred of initial skepticism just doesn't work because the filmmaker failed to establish the right tone, a platform in which the fantastical could negotiate itself within its realistic setting. But if you're adamantly against the way big-budgeted major studio films are written, in most cases, more than one writer, you'll probably enjoy the quirks, warts and all. In melding the fantastical with the everyday, even the artwork for Helium's "The Magic City" is more successful. "The Lady in the Water"(who should be mute, or learned to speak English like Daryl Hannah in "Splash") has a naive charm; there's an unawareness of how loopy this whole cinematic ordeal really is.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

DavidP.Jul 29, 2006

Muggles dont understand this amazing film, they want movies about sex and wars to give good reviews, dont let our children lose the power of imagination or surprise, this tale is about love , come on!, is not an horror film, Nights Style is Muggles dont understand this amazing film, they want movies about sex and wars to give good reviews, dont let our children lose the power of imagination or surprise, this tale is about love , come on!, is not an horror film, Nights Style is suspense ( can see the difference? ).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

BellaF.Jul 29, 2006

Beautiful story, I like it more than Pirates and Superman, this was made with a lot of heart.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

GuilleresJul 29, 2006

A jewel out of time, Alfred Hitchcok is back with good tales. Excelent!.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JenniferP.Jul 29, 2006

It's a fairy tale. I went into the theatre aware that this movie was going to be a fairy tale, and it was everything I expected it to be. This sort of movie is for the kind of person that believed all those bedtime stories as a child, It's a fairy tale. I went into the theatre aware that this movie was going to be a fairy tale, and it was everything I expected it to be. This sort of movie is for the kind of person that believed all those bedtime stories as a child, and still wants to to believe in them now. There are little nuances, touches of humanity and humour in the film that bring it to life and flesh out the characters. The professional, paid critics out there may have seen too many movies for this one to truly ring as it should. Who should watch it? The casual moviegoer, the dreamer, the person who is satisfied with a simple story.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

Rev.RikardJul 29, 2006

The trailers led us to believe we could expect an experience in horror or suspense. Instead we were treated to a fairytale. Even the fairytale wasn't that original; even the "monsters" were similar to the "grassy" red beasts in "The The trailers led us to believe we could expect an experience in horror or suspense. Instead we were treated to a fairytale. Even the fairytale wasn't that original; even the "monsters" were similar to the "grassy" red beasts in "The Village." The difference between the advertising campaign and the actual story borders on dishonesty. Shyamalan admitted this movie arose from a nightime story told to his children that developed over time. It should have stayed there.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

PhishLJul 29, 2006

Either you love it or hate it. i think we should watch it with an open mind, keeping in mind its a fairy tale. also its something different, not like all the other formulaic crap that comes out of hollywood's bowels every single day!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

MichaelO.Jul 28, 2006

The movie was excellent. It wasnt the same sort of twist as is usual for M. Nights movies, however the acting and little bits of flavor added throught were wonderful. The human element in this movie is unmissable.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

GaryM.Jul 28, 2006

Let me tell you why I gave this film an "8." This movie deserves to be seen. It deals with what should be true humanity and what being good is all about. Nowadays, being good is severely underrated. Empathy is only but a hazy dream. How do Let me tell you why I gave this film an "8." This movie deserves to be seen. It deals with what should be true humanity and what being good is all about. Nowadays, being good is severely underrated. Empathy is only but a hazy dream. How do we strive to become better? Survive life's ordeals? With love, unity, selflesness? It's true this movie has noticeable flaws, but overall it is the message, the complete product, which is truly overwhelming. This is this summer's nicest, feel good movie yet. But, hey, ... that is just my opinion.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

AngelG.Jul 28, 2006

A very good option for this season not so commercial and more creative than others.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

ScottB.Jul 27, 2006

This is among the worst studio pictures I have ever seen. I have never gone online before to offer my opinion of a film, but this one was so annoying to me, I wanted to at least make an effort to do a good deed by perhaps convincing someone This is among the worst studio pictures I have ever seen. I have never gone online before to offer my opinion of a film, but this one was so annoying to me, I wanted to at least make an effort to do a good deed by perhaps convincing someone to avoid wasting their time and money on this movie. Gave me the feeling that the whole story was made up in fifteen minutes at an improv drama class. My eyes were sore from rolling them throughout the film. Very annoying for M. Night to put himself in such a prominent role as well as use his film as a soapbox for his critics (with Bob Balaban's character). Why would Paul Giamatti agree to be in such a tookie film? Kept waiting at least for the signature Shalaman twist at the end to redeem something, but it never came. Terrible waste of time.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

CynthiaL.Jul 27, 2006

I found the movie entertaining. A story, that kept my attention to the very end. I think the critics wanted this movie to fail. They were panning it before people got a chance to see it for themselves.

1 of 1 users found this helpful

8

SGJul 27, 2006

Critics are incredibly stupid to rate this movie, which is a fairy tale told in modern symbols, as having a lack of logic. They didn't get it!! It's not meant to be taken seriously or to be a magic to modern life type Critics are incredibly stupid to rate this movie, which is a fairy tale told in modern symbols, as having a lack of logic. They didn't get it!! It's not meant to be taken seriously or to be a magic to modern life type story---it's a bed time story for childreren, and nothing more. I think they just don't know how to advertise his movies properly. The characters are all simple because they live inside of the director's "childeren' book" which apparantly he concocted for his own kids. The only one of his movies that should be examined under the logics of real life is 6th sense. The others, like this one, are just folk tales or fairy tales. Critics are a waste of space. This was not a bad movie, if you recognize that its a fairy tale for kids. He has some damn good atmpospher tricks that no other director has. nuff said.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

LomaxH.Jul 27, 2006

It is a depressing social signal that M. Night Shyamalan can, through the goodwill built up from one decent movie (made in 1999 mind you), be able to produce stinker after stinker. Unbreakable, Signs, The Village, and now Lady in the Water. It is a depressing social signal that M. Night Shyamalan can, through the goodwill built up from one decent movie (made in 1999 mind you), be able to produce stinker after stinker. Unbreakable, Signs, The Village, and now Lady in the Water. What a pathetic resume.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

LaoW.Jul 27, 2006

A brilliant contemporary adult fantasy with a certain amount of gleeful tweeking of film and film critics. Fantasy films of this type (Roan Innish, Cocteau's Belle et Bete etc) are rarely blockbusters, but this is a small delight with a A brilliant contemporary adult fantasy with a certain amount of gleeful tweeking of film and film critics. Fantasy films of this type (Roan Innish, Cocteau's Belle et Bete etc) are rarely blockbusters, but this is a small delight with a bigger box office than its audience oddly enough.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

AlexR.Jul 27, 2006

Good movie & a surprise for this summer.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

MissL.Jul 27, 2006

Gosford park, lost in traslation, The new world are some of the critic's favorite movies, they gave them good reviews, they like boring stories with out feet niether heads, and I think they hate the Talented Mr. Night Shyamalan...but Gosford park, lost in traslation, The new world are some of the critic's favorite movies, they gave them good reviews, they like boring stories with out feet niether heads, and I think they hate the Talented Mr. Night Shyamalan...but ok, The lady is a great movie that must be seen for all who believe in art, creativity...well I almost believe He is our Alfred Hitchcok. And could be better!!.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

ChadM.Jul 26, 2006

Is Lady in the Water a great film? Certainly not. But a 36? No, no, no, no, no. The incredibly harsh reviews Lady has received must be the byproduct of the current anti-Shyamalan movement apparently sweeping through Hollywood and critic Is Lady in the Water a great film? Certainly not. But a 36? No, no, no, no, no. The incredibly harsh reviews Lady has received must be the byproduct of the current anti-Shyamalan movement apparently sweeping through Hollywood and critic circles. The film suffers through a few inexcusable plot holes and some shamefully self-serving moments that are clearly Shyamalan's chosen method, albeit an immature one, of dealing with criticism. The majority of the film, however, is an interesting, original and beautifully filmed tale. Like him or not, Shyamalan is very skilled at creating mystery and fear for his audience, and that fact that he manages both again in light of the often absurd script only reinforces the idea that this guy does have some talent after all. He just needs someone to stand by him and smack him every time he comes up with a great idea like casting himself as a prolific writer or using some silly plot device such as a bedtime story told in inexplicably sporadic chunks to further the plot.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

6

KevinS.Jul 26, 2006

This movie is not nearly as bad as the critics are saying - they clearly don't get it. Lady in the Water isn't Shyamalan's best either. Giamatti does a brilliant job - and some of the special effects are great.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JoS.Jul 26, 2006

This movie was such a unique and beautiful breath of fresh air after sequals, triquals, and remakes of the past four years. The story of every humans' unique purpose in the mundane world of reality, and urge to believe is poignently This movie was such a unique and beautiful breath of fresh air after sequals, triquals, and remakes of the past four years. The story of every humans' unique purpose in the mundane world of reality, and urge to believe is poignently told through a imaginative myth, and is remarkably and beautifully acted.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

TavoS.Jul 26, 2006

I like it a lot !!, some critics can go hell. The relevant for me is what people say.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

FrankM.Jul 26, 2006

Giamatti was brilliant as usual. Will I go see it again in the theaters like I did Signs and The Village? -yes. Will I rent or buy the DVD when it comes ou?t -yes of Couse!!. For me the creativy is the best.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

JeremyW.Jul 26, 2006

For the record: I loved "6th Sense" & "Signs", but hated "Unbreakable" & "The Village"--especially "The Village. So, that said, I was very skeptical when I paid my $10 to go see this movie. As it turned out, I was pleasantly surprised. This For the record: I loved "6th Sense" & "Signs", but hated "Unbreakable" & "The Village"--especially "The Village. So, that said, I was very skeptical when I paid my $10 to go see this movie. As it turned out, I was pleasantly surprised. This movie is not great, but it is entertaining. Most importantly, M.Night does not try to tack on some lame, completely implausible twist ending as in "The Village". He basically just made a bedtime story full of colorful characters and evil beasties. Compared to a lot of the other crap Hollywood has tried to force on us this Summer, this movie holds it's own around 7.0… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

5

EliasK.Jul 26, 2006

Giamatti was brilliant as usual. Without him I shutter to think what the film would have been. Will I go see it again in the theaters like I did Signs and The Village - no. Will I rent or buy the DVD when it comes out - not likely.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

MireC.Jul 26, 2006

Good, amazing, original, I love this kind of suspense and the tales made for the kid inside of me always looking for surprises.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

HeidiH.Jul 26, 2006

Garfield 2 better than this amazing movie?, come on Critics!, sometimes you are so absurd!, this Night's movie has all that I want to see in the theaters: Art, why are you so afraid to recognize it, giving the same opinion that others ( Garfield 2 better than this amazing movie?, come on Critics!, sometimes you are so absurd!, this Night's movie has all that I want to see in the theaters: Art, why are you so afraid to recognize it, giving the same opinion that others ( critics ). Open your eyes,,, mmm! and your mind.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

[Anonymous]Jul 26, 2006

Good movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

AngelM.Jul 26, 2006

A powerful metaphor with a lot of heart -- which probably isn't what people expected or wanted from it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

LarryH.Jul 26, 2006

A beautiful fairy tale that forces it's way into The Cove's reality. I don't understand why the critics are bashing this film. It's superb storytelling and great acting. Give me a film like this over the overly praised A beautiful fairy tale that forces it's way into The Cove's reality. I don't understand why the critics are bashing this film. It's superb storytelling and great acting. Give me a film like this over the overly praised Spiderman movies any day! Shyamalan is one of the best (if not the best) storytellers around.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

DavidL.Jul 26, 2006

My friends and i were unable reach a consensus...was it embarrassingly bad, laughably bad, or tragically bad? however, we did all agree on contrived, pretentious, and stupefying. All of which is especially disappointing for me personally, as My friends and i were unable reach a consensus...was it embarrassingly bad, laughably bad, or tragically bad? however, we did all agree on contrived, pretentious, and stupefying. All of which is especially disappointing for me personally, as i thought, and still think, that "The Sixth Sense" is a masterpiece, and a far better picture than that year's Oscar winner "American Beauty" i rate "Lady In The Water" a '2' rather than a' zero' for two reasons: a beautifully evocative and sometimes truly haunting atmosphere (the cinematography and score, both excellent); and an against-all-odds beautiful and haunting lead performance by Bryce Dallas Howard, who is compellingy otherworldly and somehow entirely convincing (in a critical, but very difficult-to-carry-off part), despite the inconsistent and idiotic (and shockingly predictable) script. Without her presence the film would have been all but unwatchable, but probably even a whole lot funnier...unintentionally, of course. So, ultimately, i guess, it's really tragically bad, given the director's obvious and previously established talent, and also his apparent lack of humilty and self-awareness as an artist; he needs to spend less time and energy manufacturing and proclaiming his own cultural significance, and more time doing what he has so effectively done in the past: just create entertainment. In the end it's about the AUDIENCE, Mr Shyamalan, not about YOU.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

8

KirinH.Jul 25, 2006

Heard the bad reviews and went to see it anyways. I liked it a lot. Of course, I loved Unbreakable and many hated that one too. I think he is a genios...who else can be that imaginative? At least it is not a rehash of everything else!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JayE.Jul 25, 2006

M. Night Shyamalan's movies from this point out will all have a crippling flaw--they are not Sixth Sense. Any person who walks into a theater will expect a haunting thriller with a Big Twist at the end. When they see a heart-warming M. Night Shyamalan's movies from this point out will all have a crippling flaw--they are not Sixth Sense. Any person who walks into a theater will expect a haunting thriller with a Big Twist at the end. When they see a heart-warming though dark fairy tale with eccentric and interesting characters... they will be grossly dissapointed. What we have is a children's fairy tale that is told for the grownups, with dark visuals and off-beat characters with some very funny moments. We need to approach it as we approached the fairy tales of our youth. We know how to do that. What we have is a Tim Burton movie as told by M. Night Shyamalan.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

ZamF.Jul 25, 2006

Better than lost in traslation?, so far!!, that critics favorite boring movie in wich nothing happens, copy from a Japanese movie and they decided to give an oscar for being original?? ja, ja, Original script is Ladiy in the water, ( and not Better than lost in traslation?, so far!!, that critics favorite boring movie in wich nothing happens, copy from a Japanese movie and they decided to give an oscar for being original?? ja, ja, Original script is Ladiy in the water, ( and not boring ).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

SpongeeeJul 25, 2006

I guess it's pretty easy to write a script as you go along...I mean what's something like logic have to do with anything. This director sucks, he's way overated, and needs to stop trying to be "deep." Only thing deep was the I guess it's pretty easy to write a script as you go along...I mean what's something like logic have to do with anything. This director sucks, he's way overated, and needs to stop trying to be "deep." Only thing deep was the freakin pool. But Giamatti's stuttering was good acting, so I had something to laugh at...M Night Shamamamama sucks ding dong!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

WayneP.Jul 25, 2006

Considering the films that usually make tons of money ~ the Hollywood sequels of sequels of forgotten TV shows, and the predictably predictable romantic sit-coms crowded with the latest, hotest "STARS" ~ it's hardly surprising that Considering the films that usually make tons of money ~ the Hollywood sequels of sequels of forgotten TV shows, and the predictably predictable romantic sit-coms crowded with the latest, hotest "STARS" ~ it's hardly surprising that Shyamalan's films are generally unappreciated. Admittedly Shyamalan is an something of an acquired taste, but for anyone who is simply too tired of the fast-food films that crowd the multi-plexs to even moan anymore, Lady in the Water, like all of Shyamalan's films, is deliciously different and unselfconscious fantasy.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

ElginB.Jul 25, 2006

Frankly, I think this movie was just a big F.U. to Shyamalan's critics, and not just with the film critic character. In fact, the movie breaks lots of "rules" filmmakers and other storytellers are supposed to follow. The characters are Frankly, I think this movie was just a big F.U. to Shyamalan's critics, and not just with the film critic character. In fact, the movie breaks lots of "rules" filmmakers and other storytellers are supposed to follow. The characters are thinly drawn and often stereotypical; the plot twists in the movie seem almost ad hoc and are often advanced by exposition instead of through action. Beyond that, Shyamalan has a lot of fun with his reputation by casting himself as a Messianic writer who's opus is entitled "The Cookbook"-- sounds like a reference to the Twilight Zone, to me. And, of course, there's the character of Farber himself who is made fun of in a much more overt fashion. Anyway, I think this movie was Shyamalan's attempt at showing that he can do everything the wrong way and STILL make an entertaining movie. The fact that he succeeds only shows how much of a true talent he is.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

RichardD.Jul 25, 2006

[***SPOILER***] As an experienced movie viewer, and self-esteemed critic, compared to the other movies I've seen this year, (Pirates of the Carribean 2, The Omen, among others...) this movie was a breath of fresh air. Here's where[***SPOILER***] As an experienced movie viewer, and self-esteemed critic, compared to the other movies I've seen this year, (Pirates of the Carribean 2, The Omen, among others...) this movie was a breath of fresh air. Here's where it is different from those others...it was hilarious, it was of appropriate length, the acting was great (except for the girl who played story...she didn't really impress), the plot was involved and actually went somewhere. I hated this movie for it's lack of the trademark Shyamalan twist, and yet I loved every minute of it. This movie is not "The Sixth Sense 5" as many expected. This movie stands alone as a great work, and Paul Giamatti stands as one of my favorite actors of the day. For all the critics who say "Shyamalan just wanted to justify his own work by casting himself as a writer whose work will eventually influence a great leader of the future (forecasted by the narf)." Now, OK, I would have agree with those critics about that prior to seeing the movie, but now after watching it, I really think he's just giving a giant middle finger to those critics. And if directors are not allowed to make a movie of their own...not allowed to involve creative spirit in the process of making the movie, then we will be left with a myriad of movies just like The Omen...plastic, pre-packaged copies of the same movies over and over again. Justification? One of the characters of the Lady in the Water, Mr. Ferber, is a fervent, realistic movie critic. One of the finest lines of the movie comes directly from his mouth: "Originality doesn't exist in Hollywood anymore." Shyamalan just said in six words what I have rambled about for an eternity in this post - that he made an original movie. Show me a movie you think is related to this one, and I'll tell you how you are wrong. I stand by Shyamalan as one of the premier directors of today, picking up where Spielberg, Lucas, and other great directors of the past four decades have left off. (Honestly, what was the last good Spielberg flick you saw?) I am a creative mind, and I respect others with creative purpose. See any movie by Darren Aronofsky and you will agree (I can't wait to see the Fountain).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JordanB.Jul 24, 2006

This movie was fantastic. No it wasn't like The Sixth Sense with a huge surprise at the end and I don't believe it was meant to be. It was a fun story full of characters that are likeable and in the case of the narf and This movie was fantastic. No it wasn't like The Sixth Sense with a huge surprise at the end and I don't believe it was meant to be. It was a fun story full of characters that are likeable and in the case of the narf and giamatti's character loveable. I consider this Giamatti's best work, and I sure hope that Shyamalan keeps turning out great films. also the critics can suck it. They thought New World was good and that was the biggest pile of self inflated bs (and more boring than alexander) I have ever seen.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

AlbitaMc.Jul 24, 2006

Full of surprises for me. My critique is short because T.L.I.W. Is another Night phenomenon. Excelent!.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

LucasR.Jul 24, 2006

We live in an age where we no longer celebrate originality. in fact we celebrate the lack of it. in a world of crap movies we have a movie like "Lady in The Water" it may not be perfect, or M.Night Shamalayns best work, but it tells a story. We live in an age where we no longer celebrate originality. in fact we celebrate the lack of it. in a world of crap movies we have a movie like "Lady in The Water" it may not be perfect, or M.Night Shamalayns best work, but it tells a story. It has humor, its focused, and your supposed to latch on to something here. You're supposed to hold on to the idea that no matter what circumstance you are in, no matter where your life has taken you, you can have an awakening. You can wake up one day and realize that you are not alone, you can believe in something, and others will believe in you when you do that. Its about hope. In an age of war, terrorism, and celebration of our moral decay. You have one guy who wants to tell a story, and he did. I swear M.Night Shalayan is way ahead of his time. His ability to create a world within a world and be able to relate to his audience is his most valuable gift. "think outside of the box". Too many critics follow a sort of rule/path in which they can compare and "intelligently" critique a movie. Art is art and at the end of the day, I walked out of that theatre feeling good about myself, and thats all that really mattered to me.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

VanneG.Jul 24, 2006

Special and unique!!, there are many things that critics does not want to see, but I wanna see it again and again.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

MattH.Jul 24, 2006

A very self-serving movie -- really a vehicle for Mr. Shylaman to attack the critics he so reviles. Who casts themself in a high profile part in their own movie anyway? And for someone who strives so intently to bring together a diverse A very self-serving movie -- really a vehicle for Mr. Shylaman to attack the critics he so reviles. Who casts themself in a high profile part in their own movie anyway? And for someone who strives so intently to bring together a diverse cast, his depictions of some groups -- for instance, the Korean characters in the movie -- are extremely stereotypical. This movie is a really poor effort all the way round. The final effect is dull and boring. I do still have a huge crush on Sarita Choudoury though...she's gorgeous!!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

HalB.Jul 24, 2006

I was really hoping that the (vast) majority of legitimate critics out there were wrong; but alas, most of them are spot-on correct: this is egocentric, pretentious New Age hooey at its worst. Fine cinematography, arresting visuals and I was really hoping that the (vast) majority of legitimate critics out there were wrong; but alas, most of them are spot-on correct: this is egocentric, pretentious New Age hooey at its worst. Fine cinematography, arresting visuals and earnest performances simply cannot make up for the silly story and self-absorbed symbolism. Nothing terribly new here -- very predicable and very disappointing. It's really quite a shame, because Shyamalan has proved himself to be a real talent in most of his past work. He attempts to be Spielberg, and falls flat on his face. Of course, this is just my opinion... If you like pretentious New Age drivel, this one may be to your liking.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

AmberR.Jul 24, 2006

Best movie of the summer---beating Pirates & Superman anyday. Endearing, charming, gentle, funny, scary, and imaginative.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

PattyR.Jul 24, 2006

Excelent actings into a very original tale, a cool reason to go to the movies!.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

DesireeD.Jul 24, 2006

My favorite of M.N.S. , some critics hate his movies, why?, I love his style.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

JulietteJul 24, 2006

Simply a very good movie!!. you must see it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

SusanM.Jul 24, 2006

I thought this movie had a great story, and excellent acting by Paul Giamatti, Bryce Dallas Howard and the supporting cast. Even Shyamalan was pretty good! There is a lot of beauty and hope in this film, and it is my favourite of his films I thought this movie had a great story, and excellent acting by Paul Giamatti, Bryce Dallas Howard and the supporting cast. Even Shyamalan was pretty good! There is a lot of beauty and hope in this film, and it is my favourite of his films to date. I really felt touched when I left the theatre, which was such a nice feeling. I am actually very shocked by all the terrible things that are being said about it...I guess you have to have an open mind going into it, don't expect it to be like the last 10 films you saw because it isn't. It's just special.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

KevinF.Jul 24, 2006

Fails to establish it

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

JimP.Jul 24, 2006

There's a great story about Groucho Marx who attended a party and as he was leaving said to the hostess "I've had an unforgettable evening." Then, before she could gush out a reply, added "unfortunately, this wasn't it." That There's a great story about Groucho Marx who attended a party and as he was leaving said to the hostess "I've had an unforgettable evening." Then, before she could gush out a reply, added "unfortunately, this wasn't it." That roughly sums up my response to LITW, which I wanted to like much more than I did. There were people in the cast I enjoy seeing in anything, including the very underused Mary Beth Hurt. But when trying to sum up a film you find yourself saying "well, it wasn't the worst movie I've seen all year" you know in your heart it has to be a contender.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

MichaelK.Jul 24, 2006

Erin D.- given that your response is the most rational of all, there should be no reason for you to question it. this movie just made me cringe more and more as it became hopelessly derailed. the dialogue was clumsy and entirely unrealistic, Erin D.- given that your response is the most rational of all, there should be no reason for you to question it. this movie just made me cringe more and more as it became hopelessly derailed. the dialogue was clumsy and entirely unrealistic, characterization was rote and forced, cinematography was nonexistent or at least very plain (except for the one shot at the very end which removed from context was pretty cool) and the story was overburdened to the point where it might as well have not been there. Best part of the film, the minute-long stick figure animated piece at the beginning which was the ONLY part free of pretension. The only salvation that night was following it up with Kevin Smith's Clerks II to wash out the horrendous aftertaste. Now I would actually look forward to one of Shamylan's contrived twists.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

1

ErinD.Jul 23, 2006

I've been reading blogs and posts to see if i missed something. So far, nobody's been able to convince me why this movie ever made it into theaters, nonetheless past someone's crazy thoughts. i refuse to walk out of movies,I've been reading blogs and posts to see if i missed something. So far, nobody's been able to convince me why this movie ever made it into theaters, nonetheless past someone's crazy thoughts. i refuse to walk out of movies, always the optimist. if there were one, this would be it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

TheWatcherJul 23, 2006

The critic in me wants to boo and hiss and cry in disappointment. The 5-year-old in me wants to stand up and applaud." I just copy this great review !!. The most adecuate to this film. Thank you MR. Alex Sandell of JUICY CEREBELLUM

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

LiddyaS.Jul 23, 2006

Mizzle D. is completely insane...and dont know appreciate the real art of movies, because no one like this great movie deserves less than 6, and there are a lot of art here, hey wake up...and you poor anonymous!!. Dont go to the movies if Mizzle D. is completely insane...and dont know appreciate the real art of movies, because no one like this great movie deserves less than 6, and there are a lot of art here, hey wake up...and you poor anonymous!!. Dont go to the movies if you hate 'em.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

KatherineW.Jul 23, 2006

Don't let the critics fool you. Lady In The Water is a beautiful film, filled with subtle symbolism and hidden meanings. If you leave the film without having caught the Christ figure, the anti-war leanings, or the director's Don't let the critics fool you. Lady In The Water is a beautiful film, filled with subtle symbolism and hidden meanings. If you leave the film without having caught the Christ figure, the anti-war leanings, or the director's statement about his own work, then you didn't look hard enough. This movie is a fairytale, a story that represents greater things that the characters themselves. It is, ultimitely, a story of hope in a grey world, and I am amazed that so few people can see beneath the surface of this wonderful film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

MichasiJul 23, 2006

Usually, personal films like this tend to marginalize audiences, but it

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

LindaS.Jul 23, 2006

The crowning compliment came from my daughter as we were discussing the film on the way home from the movies today ... "Shyamalan's movies may not always be knock-down excellent, but I love going to them because they are different -- The crowning compliment came from my daughter as we were discussing the film on the way home from the movies today ... "Shyamalan's movies may not always be knock-down excellent, but I love going to them because they are different -- 'always something you don't expect." And I agree. M. Night is original. That's what keeps me going to his movies. And I suspect that LITW grows on you with multiple viewings much like The Village did. It bothers me that both TheVillage and LITW were marketed as horror movies. Neither one of them fit that bill. The Village was a haunting romance and LITW was a story of rebirth and new beginnings. 'Loved it. (I voted it an 8 instead of a 10 because SIGNS is my #10 MNS movie.) :)… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

BillyB.Jul 23, 2006

M. Night Shyamalan has based Lady in the Water on a bedtime story he read told his children and that is the biggest flaw (of many) of the movie- It plays as if someone is making up the story as it unfolds "There was a lady who lived in the M. Night Shyamalan has based Lady in the Water on a bedtime story he read told his children and that is the biggest flaw (of many) of the movie- It plays as if someone is making up the story as it unfolds "There was a lady who lived in the drain of the pool and when she came out there were terrible grass monsters that wanted to eat her but ther were also some good tree monkeys that wanted to help her......" that is how the whole movie plays out, no suspense, no twists just lots of "come on's" and "are you kidding's". There is not one credible acting performance from any of the residents living in the Condos where the story takes place and it will probably knock Giamatti down a few notches on the get list while Bryce Howard's best scene is when she says "narf" and proceeds through the rest of the movie looking like a deaf-mute Carrie. "I see wet people" and nothing much more in this absolute waste of time!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

LuisG.Jul 23, 2006

Well then DISNEY execs were actually correct in trying to convince the writer and director to go somewhere else because this is by far the worst film ive seen so far ....the village was playing it safe i enjoyed the thrill of the creature butWell then DISNEY execs were actually correct in trying to convince the writer and director to go somewhere else because this is by far the worst film ive seen so far ....the village was playing it safe i enjoyed the thrill of the creature but here we dont even ge to see anything or experience anything but questions " wheres the twist, wheres the story,wheres the monster" the monster was actaully the director himself really what an awful film....it wouldnt even play well when i was reading those goosebumps books in elemetary school....what a waste of talent ..dallas was perhaps the only particular character and thats a stretch.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

JamesG.Jul 23, 2006

This movie started out slowly, in order to introduce the characters. It then shifted gears to boring with ridiculous, plodding "plot twists" (I use that term generously) and then ended up by downshifting to a plain waste of time and money. This movie started out slowly, in order to introduce the characters. It then shifted gears to boring with ridiculous, plodding "plot twists" (I use that term generously) and then ended up by downshifting to a plain waste of time and money. You end the movie with no love for the emotionless lead actress, nor do you care for the plight of any of the hapless characters. Do everyone a favor and avoid this movie so we can send a monetary incentive to Mr. M. Night...no more pulp please! I don't know what you did with the man who wrote and directed "The Sixth Sense", but your evil must stop!"… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

J.K.Jul 23, 2006

Wow! Embarrasingly bad. What was MSN thinking?

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

MizzleD.Jul 23, 2006

This is really the worst movie I have seen in a long time. M. Night has fallen off the deep end. Here are a few reasons why: 1-Basically the entire story is explained through exposition. The mystical lady is not allowed to talk about her This is really the worst movie I have seen in a long time. M. Night has fallen off the deep end. Here are a few reasons why: 1-Basically the entire story is explained through exposition. The mystical lady is not allowed to talk about her world so we have to hear it from a very stereotypical asian woman whose voice is incredibly annoying and slightly offensive. As a minority filmmaker you would think that Night might try to give some good roles to other minorities but no, he gives those roles to himself and white actors. 2-no one in the whole story is slightly skeptical about the water lady. When the situation is explained they all just go along no questions asked. 3-Night cast himself in the [spoiler omitted] role which is so pretentious I don't know where to begin. 4-The undelying theme here is about the movie industy. The lady's name is STORY and they are all trying to save her. The FILM CRITIC character is unlikeable and [spoiler omitted]. VERY SUBTLE! 5- I can't go on...I am too annoyed. Seriously, only go see this if you are into torture or if you are half-retarded.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

BobD.Jul 23, 2006

This is the reason cinema exists. so what if shyamalan pats himself on the back on this one, portraying a writer who's book will change the world ? he deservs it ! note that not many people can stay indifferent to this movie after theyThis is the reason cinema exists. so what if shyamalan pats himself on the back on this one, portraying a writer who's book will change the world ? he deservs it ! note that not many people can stay indifferent to this movie after they have seen it- either they walked out, or they couldn't talk 2 hours after it. this is the trademark of a piece that comes from one's mind and heart, without box office considirations. it seems like shyamalan is saying :"ok, I made my money, now it's time to make a movie for myself, no matter what they'll say". it'e personal, it shows, and I love it. amazing acting as usual in shyamalan's movies.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

LauritoJul 23, 2006

Hey, some critics are crazy!!, You must go and see it...If you enjoyed Signs ang the sixth sense, maybe the village, this could be your favorite movie of M. Night, yes!, the misunderstood director of our times, but a real filmaker, director, Hey, some critics are crazy!!, You must go and see it...If you enjoyed Signs ang the sixth sense, maybe the village, this could be your favorite movie of M. Night, yes!, the misunderstood director of our times, but a real filmaker, director, producer, writer and also a good actor, The lady is so original, that others Hollywood commercial options will be forgettables as soon as you leave the theaters!, I discover that Mr. Night can laugh about critics who are so bad to call themself critics, because they write on a diary , magazine o appears on T.V. are better? than a Complete Director as Night, no!, If they were filmmakers dont could be this movie better, it dont need it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

RobertM.Jul 23, 2006

BORING. Lame. weak plot line, wasted talet. Convenient story line (again). Ego-driven director needs a reality check. Yeah right he's next Steven Spielberg. Ha!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

LuckyLuxJul 23, 2006

I wonder with this picture, Shyamalan is a great director and actor, many have envy of him?, maybe, others , want names?, are too but too overrated, but this Lady is into the water of my imagination.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

NannyR.Jul 23, 2006

I´m not in agreement with critics, they only want to see mistakes in movies, I just want to see a good movie and enjoy it, and this film has everything to make me feel like a child again. These kind of stories must see them twice to I´m not in agreement with critics, they only want to see mistakes in movies, I just want to see a good movie and enjoy it, and this film has everything to make me feel like a child again. These kind of stories must see them twice to appreciate each detail, they only see once and looking for mistakes, I can not imagine them eating pop corn ! je, je !.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

GalanshysJul 23, 2006

This is the kind of storiy I Can enjoy, and very original, others are remakes and sequels, this guy always take risks doing his own creatitvity.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

HeatherC.Jul 23, 2006

I go to movies to be entertained. I've been told a good movie is one that makes you forget you're wearing a watch so you never look to see how long it's been going. This movie did that for me. True it's contrived and not I go to movies to be entertained. I've been told a good movie is one that makes you forget you're wearing a watch so you never look to see how long it's been going. This movie did that for me. True it's contrived and not very believable but isn't that what a fairy tale is. While there's not much entertainment in the world right now it was a fun 2 hours to go to the theater and be swept away by this story and the incredible acting of Bryce Dallas Howard. I've enjoyed all of Shyamalan's movies and I think I'm one of a few so I feel this was money well spent and a good way to spend the day in rainy New England.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

OliverC.Jul 23, 2006

This movie is very different than what the commercials suggested, it isn't really a scary movie though it has scary parts. Its fun, a lot of fun, and the problem people have with this movie is that they take the plot too seriously. Of This movie is very different than what the commercials suggested, it isn't really a scary movie though it has scary parts. Its fun, a lot of fun, and the problem people have with this movie is that they take the plot too seriously. Of course it doesn't make perfect sense because it's a fairy tale. It means more than that, to me it tried to show how important all of the people you meet in life are even if they have small roles and how people can accomplish things if they work together. It also has cool monsters.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

MatthewX.Jul 23, 2006

Tina B. has proven to me in her review that she simply did not understand the point, message, or purpose of this excellent fairytale. The fact that she refers to is as not plausible shows that she was not willing to accept any sort of Tina B. has proven to me in her review that she simply did not understand the point, message, or purpose of this excellent fairytale. The fact that she refers to is as not plausible shows that she was not willing to accept any sort of fantastical child's story that personally made me feel like I was five again. One of the reason's Shyamalan is a genius is the subtle lines ans scenes he carefully puts in to remind the audience that they should forget about all the serious crap that plagues us today and remember what it was like to be a child when you would truly believe a story like this could be real. It was a very affecting and inspiring movie that I recommend everyone see. Critics needs to stop being so old and take the sticks out of their you know wheres.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

A.BryanJul 23, 2006

Very charming story, however M's choice to play the role he did came across as very pretentious. Overwise enjoyable, Paul Giamanti as always did a wonderful job!

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

DavidB.Jul 23, 2006

Disaster. What an absolute mess. Would be a 0 if not for some unintended comedy from the narfs, tartutics, scrunts, and the great eatlon. Can't help but get a laugh when the tartutics jump out of the trees to attack the scrunt, which is Disaster. What an absolute mess. Would be a 0 if not for some unintended comedy from the narfs, tartutics, scrunts, and the great eatlon. Can't help but get a laugh when the tartutics jump out of the trees to attack the scrunt, which is a evil grass hyena. ;)… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful

8

SilusG.Jul 23, 2006

Not MNS's best, but certainly a solid showing... and his larger budget is nicely reflected in better creature work. The difficulty is that this movie is a fairy tale

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

EricH.Jul 23, 2006

Fun summer movie, definitely better than how the critics are portraying it. Although some parts did seem a bit self-indulgent, the overall effect of the movie imparted that same magical feel that the best of MNS' works possess. Great Fun summer movie, definitely better than how the critics are portraying it. Although some parts did seem a bit self-indulgent, the overall effect of the movie imparted that same magical feel that the best of MNS' works possess. Great escapist experience.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

MichaelR.Jul 23, 2006

It's interesting to me that people either strongly like or strongly dislike this movie. There is much more to LITW than meets the eye. This "Story" is clearly a very personal offering about MNS himself and the inspired muses who he It's interesting to me that people either strongly like or strongly dislike this movie. There is much more to LITW than meets the eye. This "Story" is clearly a very personal offering about MNS himself and the inspired muses who he feels (rightly) are sent to him from God. Would that we all felt such a sense of responsibility for those things we are blessed with, temporal and spiritual.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

3

MikeAJul 23, 2006

This wasn't as strong a strory as "The Village". It didn't have a story that really drew us in. Plus the kid reading spiritual things off of the cereal boxes. Come on this movie "jumped the shark" from that point on.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

TylerW.Jul 23, 2006

An interesting peice of work. Giamatti and Howard are excellent;Shyamalan's role in the cast of this film was not at all bad.As for some of the nay-sayers out there who hated this movie I have this to say;Shyamalan does not glorify An interesting peice of work. Giamatti and Howard are excellent;Shyamalan's role in the cast of this film was not at all bad.As for some of the nay-sayers out there who hated this movie I have this to say;Shyamalan does not glorify himself by acting in a key role.That's like saying Mel Gibson's role as William Wallace in Braveheart [which he directed] was an egotistical, selfrightous decision. And Shyamalan's choice to kill off the film cridict wasn't meant to give a big fuck you to the critics who misjudge him, but it was supposed to show what happened to the non-believer,cynic of The Cove appartment complex. Sadly though, most film criticts are very cynical, narrow-minded people.This film wasn't what I expected, but it was still a fine vessal of a story.It's a lot more entertaining than the sundance Indie. sh.. that has been popular lately.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

4

BirdL.Jul 23, 2006

Is it just me or did anybody else see that stupid microphone hanging from the top of the screen almost all the way through the movie. i mean what a distraction for 8.00 dollars.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

PhilJul 23, 2006

Easily his worst movie. What made it so bad was that it had the potential to be interesting, immersive, and unique. Lady actually ended up exasperatingly stupid, with 'narfs' and 'scrunts' and 'tootie-fruities' Easily his worst movie. What made it so bad was that it had the potential to be interesting, immersive, and unique. Lady actually ended up exasperatingly stupid, with 'narfs' and 'scrunts' and 'tootie-fruities' or whatever those grass ape things were. The monologues with more and more incoherent combinations of all the made-up words served as the greatest unintentional comedy I've seen at a movie theater. Aside from that, it was a boring slog featuring a slew of forgettable performances and as a whole fell far short of what the trailers would lead you to believe. I wish I could sue Shyamalan for the $9.50 that I spent seeing this movie. Had I flushed my money down the toilet instead, at least I could have spent two more enjoyable hours with a plunger trying to get it back.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

0

TinaB.Jul 23, 2006

The most magical thing about this movie is the spell that Shyamalan's fans seem to be under. Somehow it suspends not only their disbelief, but their intelligence, discernment, good taste, and need for logic, coherence and plausability.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

BlakeK.Jul 23, 2006

This movie might not be scary, but it's definately good. The whole movie is basically a bedtime story come true. Not big on twists, but I think it has a nice pace, and has some thought provoking ideas. This isn't the best movie M. This movie might not be scary, but it's definately good. The whole movie is basically a bedtime story come true. Not big on twists, but I think it has a nice pace, and has some thought provoking ideas. This isn't the best movie M. has made, but it's not horrible. Don't listen to the critics, it's worth seeing.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

10

SriHarshaKJul 23, 2006

WOW and Awesome were the two words tht came to my mouth after watching the film. Almost perfect.....one of his best. And critics should just shut up and limit themselves to the normal crap that they like. Worth watching twice and i am dying WOW and Awesome were the two words tht came to my mouth after watching the film. Almost perfect.....one of his best. And critics should just shut up and limit themselves to the normal crap that they like. Worth watching twice and i am dying to watch it again.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

JakeJul 22, 2006

Great film, great acting, and great story. critics...they dont know anything.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

PaulD.Jul 22, 2006

Loved the movie. MNS's best so far. He uses cinema elements in a very effective way. often you have scenes where more than one character are involved but the framing is such that you only see one character and in some way are connected Loved the movie. MNS's best so far. He uses cinema elements in a very effective way. often you have scenes where more than one character are involved but the framing is such that you only see one character and in some way are connected to their thoughts and feelings while aware of the other characters presence. This forces your imagination to fill in the blanks. Well done cinematography. Shyamalan also uses speed ramping in a very effective way, and allows the viewer to understand the pace of the film and continue the suspense properly. While the plot meanders, the plot devices seem a little canned but are none the less compelling. the acting is superb and the blend of Mythology and real life is interesting and engaging. A beautiful film that tells a story using all of the tools a good filmmaker should: cinematography, sound, editing, and mise en scene. Wish it wasn't getting such poor reviews, because it's such an intelligent film. Great work Shyamalan!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

DentonM.Jul 22, 2006

The movie was excellent. It checked the box on another genre for M. Night: fairy tale. For some reason the system decided to not like M. Night, and they've taken it out in ad homonym attacks on him. It's too bad, because they are The movie was excellent. It checked the box on another genre for M. Night: fairy tale. For some reason the system decided to not like M. Night, and they've taken it out in ad homonym attacks on him. It's too bad, because they are guilty of what they accuse him of doing, using their craft to promote their own selfish agenda. This movie is an excellent movie and will stand the test of time.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

9

EddieS.Jul 22, 2006

Definitely better than what the critics would have you believe. maybe they were offended by the movie critic character in the movie...

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

JustinL.Jul 22, 2006

Every Shyamalan movie is different, requiring an open mind to consider yourself a fan of his work. Though unique, all have merit. Lady in the Water is a rare original fairy tale, and the most humor-rich of his films. I found a lot of it Every Shyamalan movie is different, requiring an open mind to consider yourself a fan of his work. Though unique, all have merit. Lady in the Water is a rare original fairy tale, and the most humor-rich of his films. I found a lot of it overly convenient to be believable, but the overall experience was a positive one. Shymalan weaves a wonderful web, also knowing that everything doesn't need to be shown on the screen. Giamatti was great, Howard was mysteriously less-is-more, and the ensemble cast was cleverly entertaining. Glad I saw it in theaters before reading any reviews or watching trailers. I imagine our home will own the DVD, too -- just like The Village.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

7

NatS.Jul 22, 2006

Not bad, though not great. Cool story, but just a little too weird and absurd to compare it to The Sixth Sense

0 of 0 users found this helpful

2

GregM.Jul 22, 2006

The fact that this is a FAIRY TALE does not excuse it from being bad. Sorry to all of those who seem to think so. It is still bad, very bad, so pretentious (which does not make it smart or brilliant, just pretentious) in its earnestness thatThe fact that this is a FAIRY TALE does not excuse it from being bad. Sorry to all of those who seem to think so. It is still bad, very bad, so pretentious (which does not make it smart or brilliant, just pretentious) in its earnestness that I cringed. The best fairy tales tell us something about ourselves, this fairy tale tells us about MSN, his ego, and his lack of coherence. For the love of god and everything that is good in the world, could someone inform him that as a director he makes a pretty but pretty bad movie, but as an actor he is absolutely HORRID? Not to mention it shatters our suspension of disbelief, which, last I looked, is why I go to movies. Instead I sit there thinking: ah, hey, here's the director, making his dumb cameo for which there is no reason, and isn't he a windowlicker for it?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

1

LarryM.Jul 22, 2006

Shyamalan has the biggest ego in movies since Orson Well's, and this movie is an example of absolute power corrupting absolutely. The dialog is humerous in its lack of direction.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

8

MelecioR.Jul 22, 2006

I enjoyed it a lot, forget the critics. Its definitely very original.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

Lady in the Water

User Reviews