Universal Pictures | Release Date: February 3, 2023
5.5
USER SCORE
Mixed or average reviews based on 146 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
61
Mixed:
54
Negative:
31
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
5
Stream2BigScreeFeb 3, 2023
Okay, Streamers, I know we all have been waiting on pins and needles for M. Night Shyamalan’s next feature film, and it’s finally here. Oh, was that only me? Okay, then… Anway, I was anticipating Knock at the Cabin since I saw the firstOkay, Streamers, I know we all have been waiting on pins and needles for M. Night Shyamalan’s next feature film, and it’s finally here. Oh, was that only me? Okay, then… Anway, I was anticipating Knock at the Cabin since I saw the first trailer last fall. Home invasion and the end of the world movies build on reasonable fears that many people have, so let’s see what Shyamalan was able to do with the mix of these two.

Knock at the Cabin is based on a novel by Paul Tremblay, “The Cabin at the End of the World.” Shyamalan and his co-writers have adapted that novel into this movie. The basic premise is that a gay couple and their adopted daughter are on a vacation in a remote cabin in Pennsylvania when four strangers come to the cabin and tell them that the world will end unless they decide to sacrifice one of their own. It’s a moral dilemma – kill someone you love in order to save billions of people you don’t even know. What would you do if these hijinks ensue.

Here’s the thing – the premise of this movie is very interesting. It immediately makes the audience question what decision they would make and what questions they would ask if put in this situation. In that way, the movie easily grabs you. The problem is that Shyamalan doesn’t do much more than pose the question and go through the motions of telling you what these guys do. It gets repetitive and there isn’t enough development of the gay couple as characters to help the audience care about them or why they make the decisions they make. Therefore, the movie becomes pretty frustrating and unsatisfying.

On the other hand, there are some good aspects. Dave Bautista, who plays one of the strangers, Leonard, is an inviting presence on screen. He can be menacing by his sheer size, but his performance ably fights against first impressions. Rupert Grint, who play another stranger, Redmond, brings a bit of dark humor. He’s probably the scariest of the strangers. I’ll also mention that even though I don’t believe they are well-developed characters, Ben Aldridge and Jonathan Groff, who play the gay couple, Eric and Andrew, have good chemistry and react appropriately in this situation. I’ll also say that no one does anything really dumb in this movie, which typically happens in these home invasion movies. Eric and Andrew, generally, make smart decisions to help protect each other and their daughter. So, the movie isn’t frustrating because anyone is dumb.

I also don’t know why this movie is rated R. There isn’t really any gore. There isn’t anything visually scary about it. There may be some curse words, but I can’t imagine they were enough to justify this not being PG-13.

In conclusion, Knock at the Cabin is a decent entry in the Shyamalan filmography. It is not one of his best, but it also certainly not one of the worst. There is a good premise, but the movie doesn’t do anything more than present it as a morality play, which eventually becomes repetitive. Although there are good performances, there isn’t enough character development to sustain interest in these individuals. Knock at the Cabin is only good enough for a handful of popcorn – there’s no urgency to see this in a theater.
Expand
6 of 6 users found this helpful60
All this user's reviews
5
TVJerryFeb 9, 2023
Jonathan Groff and Ben Aldridge play daddies who are out for a vacation with their daughter in the titular cabin. Almost immediately, four ominous people show up with a mind-boggling decision: One of the family members must die by the handsJonathan Groff and Ben Aldridge play daddies who are out for a vacation with their daughter in the titular cabin. Almost immediately, four ominous people show up with a mind-boggling decision: One of the family members must die by the hands of their spouse and they must choose which one. Why? To save the world from yet another apocalypse. Being that this is the latest from M. Night Shyamalan, you can expect some tension from his juxtaposition of languid camerawork and forceful moments of emotion. The actors all ramp up the drama with their intense performances. This basically boils down to an extended debate with the daddies doubting the inevitable and the quartet desperately pleading to save the world. As such, there aren't any scares and the stress level stays at the same mild buzz without ever building to any crescendo.  Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
4
Rebecca31Feb 16, 2023
Knock At The Cabin feels like Funny Games meets The Cabin in the Woods with a bit of Knowing thrown in the mix. The result being an underwhelming and frustrating movie with a good idea and a terrible ending.

Eric (Jonathan Groff), Andrew
Knock At The Cabin feels like Funny Games meets The Cabin in the Woods with a bit of Knowing thrown in the mix. The result being an underwhelming and frustrating movie with a good idea and a terrible ending.

Eric (Jonathan Groff), Andrew (Ben Aldridge) and their daughter Wen (Kirsten Cui) take a holiday in a remote cabin in the woods and are very quickly taken hostage by four strangers. The group led by Leonard (Dave Bautista), believe the apocalypse is imminent and the only way to stop it is for this chosen family to make an impossible choice. With no connection to the outside world, Eric and Andrew must decide what to believe before it’s too late. And this is why you don’t take a vacation in a dodgy looking cabin in the middle of nowhere. We’ve all seen enough horror movies to know that isn’t going to end well.

For an M. Night film Knock at the Cabin is surprisingly predictable and hugely underwhelming. Normally I get a lot of enjoyment from Shyamalan’s movies, even the bad ones but this was lacking any tension or horror. The set up was very well done but after that it’s quickly downhill, plodding along until the seemingly dramatic ending it’s been trying to build up to. An ending so awful it just left me annoyed. No spoilers here but there was two obvious endings that they could have gone with and unfortunately for everyone they went with the really dull one that I can’t imagine went down well with most people because honestly it was one of the most lackluster endings I’ve ever seen in a horror movie. This had potential to be a much deeper psychological thriller. A wasted opportunity and apparently didn’t do the book much justice.

Dave Bautista is easily the best thing about Knock at the Cabin, his performance as the hugely intimidating Leonard who the audience is never sure is crazy or not is the only thing that stopped me falling asleep. But what should have been a tense movie that keeps you on the edge of your seat was just unexciting, uninteresting and instantly forgettable.

At this point, there’s far more bad Shyamalan movies than good ones. Enough for me to reconsider whether I should bother anymore. There was lots of wasted potential with Knock at the Cabin so best to go into it with low expectations. Recommended for any of the M. Night Shyamalan fans who liked The Happening, there’s probably not many of you but you might enjoy Knock at the Cabin.
Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
4
moviecritic68Feb 14, 2023
Barely stayed out of the red category. To put it bluntly the movie is lame. Poor acting & casting
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
2
chevkochFeb 23, 2023
A disappointingly linear stage piece that rides on a shallow mystery which inner workings remain unexplained. Everything in the end is simply the way as it has been presented. Violence that does not serve to make the story more interesting,A disappointingly linear stage piece that rides on a shallow mystery which inner workings remain unexplained. Everything in the end is simply the way as it has been presented. Violence that does not serve to make the story more interesting, hints at divine reasons for the apocalypse a mere exercise in vacuity. Utterly bland. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
4
frnzchrstphrFeb 22, 2023
I am not really sure what they are really telling, this supposed to be thrilling but I am not thrilled the whole time.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
2
Brent_MarchantFeb 4, 2023
Writer-director M. Night Shyamalan truly is a filmmaker who has lost his way. The once-promising auteur has delivered yet another in a string of cinematic disappointments with this long-winded, overly talky, patently obvious, unsuspensefulWriter-director M. Night Shyamalan truly is a filmmaker who has lost his way. The once-promising auteur has delivered yet another in a string of cinematic disappointments with this long-winded, overly talky, patently obvious, unsuspenseful account of an unexpected visit to a vacationing family (a pair of same-sex parents and their young adopted daughter) by the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse (no, I’m not giving anything away here – that’s apparent from the trailer, let alone the excessively delayed revelation in the film). The members of this alternative household are given the option by their unforeseen visitors to sacrifice one of themselves in order to forestall the end of the world, an inevitability sure to pass if they fail to comply. And, if they refuse, the bringers of doom will themselves be sacrificed, after which various calamities will be unleashed against humanity. As intriguing as this premise is, though, the players in this story, quite ironically, talk this possibility to death, leaving viewers wishing for something to happen to make the production even moderately interesting (talk about yawn city). In addition to the endless dialogue, audiences are fed a diet of cheesy, sometimes-implausible special effects, gratuitous violence (even if only by implication), and, surprisingly, the lack of a twist, one of this director’s signature artistic tricks. What’s more, actor Dave Bautista, as capable as he might be in any number of supporting roles, simply isn’t up to carrying the lead here; he’s just not a strong enough performer for that. But what’s most troubling are the themes permeating this work, even if unintentional or only cautionary in nature. The “be very afraid of everything” message runs strong and deep, as does the picture’s conventional fire and brimstone religiosity. Even its well-meaning support of the gay community boomerangs on itself and ultimately reinforces (albeit inadvertently) stereotypically homophobic sentiments and outlooks. At this point, given the filmmaker’s track record, I’m puzzled that any backers would want to continue giving money to Shyamalan to keep making movies. It’s been a long time since he’s made anything worth watching, and this offering merely continues a trend that’s been going on for years now. Expand
7 of 8 users found this helpful71
All this user's reviews
2
hnestlyontheslyFeb 5, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. KatC is a livewire act of dumb filmmaking. Someone needs to stop M Night from doing this. He shouldn't be allowed to gaslight us with half-formed movies anymore and every time he does we lose a little bit of our dignity, a little bit of our standards erode.

Look, I am not someone unsympathetic to the art of creepypasta doomsday predictions. There's a game that I've played with Wife before, usually when we're on vacation and I feel like she's getting too comfortable: how many times could you hear the same song out in the wild before you started questioning your reality? We took a walk through the park by the beach once and heard the same song from two or three different passersby, on a boom box, blasting out of a boat, through the earphones of some jogger, prompting us to wonder if we'd encountered the same radio station looping a popular song over the course of the hour. I keep a little news clip on my desktop, one that I at this very moment am wary of sharing because of 1) how it will make me look maybe a little bit unwell and 2) how unwell I'll feel if suddenly my corroborating evidence suddenly vanishes: a screenshot of an article that's clearly a typo about deforestation, but which looks like something that was accidentally posted from the future into the present, a kind of glitch in the Matrix that tests your ability not to be weirded out. The article is still up there, still hasn't been fixed after more than a year as of this writing, which somehow makes it weirder.

Which is to say, I'm game for some weird end of days stuff. Sign me up, hey I'll even bring my anxieties about time travel along for the ride if you let me. This movie was not an invitation into the uncanny. The deep exhale you take because the film begins exactly where one would hope, no preamble, just cold hard home invasion from the trailer, doesn't actually accelerate the plot into something new and unexpected. Part of the immense disappointment, the deep shame, palpable within everyone who looked around for confirmation of their poor decisions at the cut to black, is that there, as far as I can tell, is no depth to this story at all. It is entirely concept: what if doomsdayers happened to be right one particular time? Could they convince a normie that it was real? The real monkey wrench that you're waiting for, the hiccup that's going to send you reeling? Minor. Barely an inconvenience. Our access to verification that the End Times are nigh is freely available on cable television. The set of compounding coincidences seem fairly compelling by the third "plague" released by the Horsemen. Rather than leave some strategic ambiguity, as the term is used in foreign policy, M Night and his goons resort to some heavy-handed realism. There is some dispute among Friends on this, one maintains that the "twist" is that it's all real, but I think anyone who's been subjected to the trailer is already prepared for some of even the most final scenes of the movie. The twist I detect, if it can be called that, is that the victims have already encountered some of the Horsemen previously, which is, hey, not a terrible complication, but also seems a little bit sidelined by the fact that so many bad things are happening in such quick succession. Wife, during our quick debrief at the end of the night, asked if it felt at all like Ready or Not ("I maintain that was a good movie," she reiterated just now), where the end's twist really does put into question and complicate some of the comedy of earlier in the movie. "It was just 'everything's real, deal with it'," I said, deflated. "Was any of it redeemable?" I asked, distraught, as Friends scattered to the winds in the parking lot, and what I think I meant was, would it have been better if all the bad things had been a little... smaller? I suppose? If a nascent pandemic had come on the heels of a few aircraft failures during an especially bad day of war? If, in other words, it had been February 2020? But that's White Noise, that's Don't Look Up.

The slow disaster that we can't see coming because it's creeping up on us so slowly or we're so blinkered, so consumed in our own drama, we don't even notice. Maybe that would've been a trite commentary, but instead, we got a crisis of faith plot on training wheels, which, as one Friend put it, at no point ever trusted the audience to understand nuance.

I'm frustrated at myself for thinking this could be more than the sum of its parts. I'm frustrated that I thought an end credits scene could redeem the first ninety minutes of it. I'm frustrated but you don't need to be. I had a Friend who I invited who never showed up and he dodged a bullet, which is more than I can say for any of the characters in this movie.
Expand
6 of 7 users found this helpful61
All this user's reviews
4
royalguy07Feb 3, 2023
Honestly this just had a shockingly low amount of tension. The way its presented there is no reason to fear for the protagonists, and the "end of the world" angle wasn't really helping for caring for anyone else.
6 of 7 users found this helpful61
All this user's reviews
1
TyrakFeb 3, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. M Night Shyamalan's big twist this time is that he took the ending of the book and made it terrible.

Like, I'm not kidding, this movie follows the plot of the book it's based on almost *religiously* (hah), until the point where the original story had a major twist that lead into an interesting and dramatic end with a thoughtful message. This adaptation removes that twist, and replaces it with... Being predictable? I guess that's the twist?? That it's got a **** ending this time???

I genuinely don't know what the point of this film was supposed to be, but whatever it was, it was depressing and unsatisfying. If the concept sounds interesting, just read the book I guess. This ain't it.

(... Dave Bautista was an inspired casting choice, though, so he alone gets points on this one.)
Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
6
JLuis_001Feb 4, 2023
Even if its menacing atmosphere remains the best constant of suspense for its narrative, the resource lacks variations after its introduction, since basically everything that follows after the revelation of what the story is about are onlyEven if its menacing atmosphere remains the best constant of suspense for its narrative, the resource lacks variations after its introduction, since basically everything that follows after the revelation of what the story is about are only basically reactionary moments that only have the purpose of advancing the plot and to make sense, since the closed area where the events take place does not allow for anything else.

It's a good exercise in tension and suspense, not necessarily horror. It's hardly thought-provoking, as I've read in some professional reviews, but Shyamalan manages to make his film work from start to finish, even with its marked flaws and suspension of believability.
It's his best film since Split, but that's not saying much.

If you want to see the best he's currently doing you'd better watch Servant on Apple TV+, though I definitely won't tell you in any way not to give this story a chance.
Expand
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
5
DolphinReviewsFeb 7, 2023
it's alright...................................................................
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
3
GameBossFeb 21, 2023
The main issue is the complete lack of mystery, that MNS is known for: you are absolutely sure about what will happen, who will die, and if the apocalypse actually exists or not. Everything else is good, the camera is in place, and the actorsThe main issue is the complete lack of mystery, that MNS is known for: you are absolutely sure about what will happen, who will die, and if the apocalypse actually exists or not. Everything else is good, the camera is in place, and the actors are doing their job, but the lack of any uncertainty is just boring. Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
0
heloheFeb 8, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. What kind of **** adaption is this? Did Shyamalan even read and understand the book? The whole story is supposed very ambiguous. Wen is supposed to die for nothing. And they are not supposed to choose anyone in the end. The whole book is a story of the absurdity and cruelty of the idea of a god. This movie clearly did not get this. This feels like a christian apologist marathon. In the book they do not make a sacrifice in the end because they do not give a **** about a cruel god who would make them do something so messed up. Expand
8 of 11 users found this helpful83
All this user's reviews
3
kpaulFeb 23, 2023
This movie is pretentious and exhausting. Worst kind of woke. Characters making unrealistic choices, no one is relatable, and goals aren't believable. Acting is great but with such bad material in such a bad vehicle, it's not noticeable.This movie is pretentious and exhausting. Worst kind of woke. Characters making unrealistic choices, no one is relatable, and goals aren't believable. Acting is great but with such bad material in such a bad vehicle, it's not noticeable.

Dialog is stilted and unreliable. Angles and cuts are jarring and is more disengaging then the story and characters.

As someone who's been trying to make a living as a filmmaker for 20 years, It's mind boggling that something like this gets made.
Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
1
NorthPeruvianCJun 18, 2023
A thinly veiled horror/suspense story wrapped in modern w0keisms pushing an agenda which constantly detracts from any good storytelling. It's about "the message" and pushing the two dads narrative, no interesting dialogue, bland action, aA thinly veiled horror/suspense story wrapped in modern w0keisms pushing an agenda which constantly detracts from any good storytelling. It's about "the message" and pushing the two dads narrative, no interesting dialogue, bland action, a terrible plot with the central focus of the entire film actually about sexuality and life choices. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
1
2qew3rst567uMay 13, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I usually am a huge Shyamalan fan but this movie had NO TWIST, I repeat, this movie had no twist!!!

Also, the characters are bland, the plot is weak and I struggled to give a **** about the movie.
Forgot the daughter existed from how shallow she was, the dads were lame since they just loved each other and were traumatized by a bar fight AND THATS IT, THATS THEIR PERSONALITIES!! The apocalypse felt half assed too, it wasn't severe enough, we haven't been shown enough about it as well.
The only good thing is Dave Bautista, he was pretty neat.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
Daniel_EndureFeb 3, 2023
Don't go in expecting any twists, turns, or surprises. This movie is about as straight-forward as they come. It's like Bros, but a thriller.
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
10
ZiggingZebraFeb 3, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Before I begin, I just want to say if you don’t like M. Night movies, you might not like this one. I love nearly all of his movies. He’s my favorite director. I’m aware that some may not like his style, but I love it, even with ideas I’m not completely sure of from the trailer.

That brings me to the trailer for this film. When I saw the trailer for the first time, I was a little underwhelmed. I saw the elements of what an M. Night movie, but I felt like I was missing something. Ironically, what I found was that it wasn’t what was missing, it was everything that was there. It’s a simple concept that’s more horrifying to think about than to watch on screen — unless you jump into story head first. It starts quickly, so you have to choose to go with it from the beginning, but once you do go with it, there’s a lot of dread to be found. It’s classic M. Night writing as well, where it seems more like he’s writing a book than a movie and that’s what makes his movies the most interesting to me. Yes, this is adapted from a book, but M. Night’s writing style is paperback, maybe even a little comic-booky. Once you let yourself believe there are people in this world that can predict an apocalypse, everything falls into place, but you won’t be massaged into it. For better of for worse, this has been his style. And yes, you can say there’s a “twist” in the film, but I won’t spoil that. Make the choice.
Expand
4 of 12 users found this helpful48
All this user's reviews
1
Perseus69May 12, 2023
A movie in which literally the first dialogue is about how "cool" is for a young kid to have two dads, and how bigot and obtuse everyone else at school is. Hard pass. I can't stand this **** anymore.
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
9
alanpotter17Feb 5, 2023
É bem verdade que, por ser uma adaptação, a construção do roteiro foi facilitada para que Shyamalan pudesse fazer o seu filme, e de certo modo ele consegue extrair o máximo dentro das limitações da história, temos aqui um filme muitoÉ bem verdade que, por ser uma adaptação, a construção do roteiro foi facilitada para que Shyamalan pudesse fazer o seu filme, e de certo modo ele consegue extrair o máximo dentro das limitações da história, temos aqui um filme muito competente.
Em primeiro lugar, as interpretações estão todas muito boas, especialmente da família, conseguem passar com veracidade a sensação de medo (destaque para a menina, que achado). Daí pra frente a simbologia referente à religião e ao fato de serem um casal gay soa até simples, mas dignamente apresentada. Os arcos estão amarrados, as motivações são claras e objetivas, o filme flui, não tem um tempo excessivo.
Por possibilitar discussões que vão além do seu material, este é um filme do Shy que já entra entre meus favoritos e me atiçou a conhecer o livro. Filmaço.
Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
8
BigL78Feb 4, 2023
Shyamalans best work in years and Dave Bautistas performance was exceptional. A genuinely tense thriller that had me on the edge of my seat and remained thought provoking hours after leaving the cinema
1 of 8 users found this helpful17
All this user's reviews
8
tremaultFeb 6, 2023
Par for the course for an M Night Shyamalan movie. I actually really enjoyed this. Maybe I just really enjoy watching Dave Bautista. I was thankful that they didn't rely on gratuitous gore to get the point across, that's the main thing I wasPar for the course for an M Night Shyamalan movie. I actually really enjoyed this. Maybe I just really enjoy watching Dave Bautista. I was thankful that they didn't rely on gratuitous gore to get the point across, that's the main thing I was afraid of. This was tastefully done and very emotional. Expand
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
6
RalfbergsFeb 28, 2023
While I do think it was quite ok, it did feel like it had something missing to make it more thrilling or interesting. Like - the story was too straightforward or something. By the trailer it seemed it will be much more interesting
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
GLADIADORFeb 5, 2023
Um bom suspense com uma leve pitada de tensão, batem a porta é muito competente em fazer a gente se importar com a familia do filme, apesar de alguns flashback fora de tempo
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
7
TomMondayFeb 11, 2023
It’s not bad. If this were a first film from a new director, people would hail it as genius. But because the movie bears some of M’s perennial questionable techniques (too many close-ups, fool’s logic, etc.), it’s hard to see the picture asIt’s not bad. If this were a first film from a new director, people would hail it as genius. But because the movie bears some of M’s perennial questionable techniques (too many close-ups, fool’s logic, etc.), it’s hard to see the picture as anything but a solid entry in the director’s workmanlike mid-career. Expand
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
7
iCampoRamilFeb 8, 2023
Recomiendo no ver el tráiler, llama mucho la atención la incertidumbre que genera, no sabes de qué va el rollo, el porqué está pasando las cosas. Cuando descubres el trasfondo y te planteas tú mismo el enigma, te va a molar.

· Cosas buenas:
Recomiendo no ver el tráiler, llama mucho la atención la incertidumbre que genera, no sabes de qué va el rollo, el porqué está pasando las cosas. Cuando descubres el trasfondo y te planteas tú mismo el enigma, te va a molar.

· Cosas buenas: la incertidumbre y su trasfondo, todo cobra sentido. Las interpretaciones son muy buenas, el uso del sonido y de la música acompaña muy guay. Algunos planos y zooms muy Shyamalan.
· Cosas malas: se me hace demasiado correcta, le falta algo de riesgo, un giro de Shyamalan. Mola porque tú mismo reflexionas, pero luego se cierra a la no interpretación. Molaría que la dejasen algo más abierta.
· Conclusión: merece la pena verla, pero como ya dije, no recomiendo ver el tráiler e ir en completa ignorancia, te va a molar la presentación de la idea, luego una vez se "calma" todo, puede que se te haga algo lentilla, pero acaba mereciendo la pena.
Expand
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
7
MattyIce34Feb 3, 2023
Some flashbacks and clunky M. Night dialogue hold back the tension, but Bautista continues to choose interesting projects. Mostly enjoyed this, Shyamalan’s best film since The Visit.
0 of 5 users found this helpful05
All this user's reviews
8
ALAMLEDPFeb 9, 2023
In M Night Shyamalan's Knock at the Cabin, a peaceful family vacation is disrupted by four mysterious visitors, each wielding elaborate medieval weapons. Dave Bautista stars as one of the strangers, who demands entry into Eric (JonathanIn M Night Shyamalan's Knock at the Cabin, a peaceful family vacation is disrupted by four mysterious visitors, each wielding elaborate medieval weapons. Dave Bautista stars as one of the strangers, who demands entry into Eric (Jonathan Groff) and Andrew's (Ben Aldridge) holiday home, along with their adopted daughter Wen (Kristen Cui). Despite their reluctance, the strangers eventually gain entry and explain to the family that they must sacrifice one of their own to save the rest of humanity. Through this taut and suspenseful home invasion thriller, Shyamalan creates an atmosphere of existential dread, as the family must decide whether or not to trust the strangers' motives. Adapted from Paul Tremblay's novel, Knock at the Cabin is a gripping, efficient picture with a captivating performance from Bautista.
________________________

En Knock at the Cabin de M Night Shyamalan, cuatro visitantes misteriosos interrumpen unas tranquilas vacaciones familiares, cada uno empuñando elaboradas armas medievales. Dave Bautista interpreta a uno de los extraños, que exige entrar en la casa de vacaciones de Eric (Jonathan Groff) y Andrew (Ben Aldridge), junto con su hija adoptiva Wen (Kristen Cui). A pesar de su desgana, los extraños finalmente logran entrar y le explican a la familia que deben sacrificar a uno de los suyos para salvar al resto de la humanidad. A través de este tenso y lleno de suspenso, Shyamalan crea una atmósfera de terror existencial, ya que la familia debe decidir si confiar o no en los motivos de los extraños. Adaptada de la novela de Paul Tremblay, Knock at the Cabin es una imagen apasionante y eficiente con una actuación cautivadora de Bautista.
Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
8
KyleWaitFeb 12, 2023
In a psychological horror film set in the present day, we find an array of shots throughout the film that commend Shyamalan’s skill for tension and buildup, accompanied by unique angles of scenes and potentially symbolic, quicker shots. WhileIn a psychological horror film set in the present day, we find an array of shots throughout the film that commend Shyamalan’s skill for tension and buildup, accompanied by unique angles of scenes and potentially symbolic, quicker shots. While it’s not entirely concrete as to how this family was chosen for the events in the movie, the audience is left to decide on why what happens, happens. The answer to this question ultimately comes down to perception; the proof of the clashing viewpoints is vague enough for the viewers where it could really go either way. One thing that is clear in the entire film is that the power of manipulation and coercion is ever present throughout, which leads the audience to constantly doubt itself. Although this film has religious undertones, it certainly deals with psychological and emotional manipulation and how it can factor into some very intense and somewhat believable decision-making, possibly leaving its audience with some self-reflection, especially in a case where no matter what decision is made, it will not fully favor the one making it. Expand
0 of 5 users found this helpful05
All this user's reviews
10
jonathan1818Feb 13, 2023
One of the latest best films by M. Night shlamayan. Good scenery, characters and atmosphere just as its director knows how to do
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
7
dharma2Mar 5, 2023
Knock at the Cabin is M Night Shyamalan's latest thriller, and it's his usual forte. If you are a fan, you will be intrigued. Other viewers may be perplexed on what the fuss is all about, as many viewers just weren't there during Night's 'heyday'.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
ArianmovieFeb 22, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It was a good and entertaining movie, for me the theme of the movie was cool and impressive, but one of the flaws of the movie in my opinion was the type of death of the four members of the group, which I think would have been more beautiful if each of them had died in a different way. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
triadneMar 15, 2023
Par for the course for an M Night Shyamalan movie. I actually really enjoyed this. Maybe I just really enjoy watching Dave Bautista. I was thankful that they didn't rely on gratuitous gore to get the point across, that's the main thing I wasPar for the course for an M Night Shyamalan movie. I actually really enjoyed this. Maybe I just really enjoy watching Dave Bautista. I was thankful that they didn't rely on gratuitous gore to get the point across, that's the main thing I was afraid of. This was tastefully done and very emotional.

Also, I'd like to beg the question, why does a Shyamalan movie always have to have some 'twist' to it? Sure, I expect the movie to give me food for thought but is there some secret surprising 'twist' to the story? I didn't get that impression from the trailers and the movie didn't seem to be suggesting one and I just enjoyed each moment for what it was. In the end, I was satisfied with the way it went, regardless of whether or not I already knew the end or guessed the end or didn't guess it.
Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
2
AgarritMar 25, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The scene at the end with the daughter and father, with the radio, was my favorite scene. I wasn’t super impressed overall and mostly just hated the plot. I didn’t care for some of the directing. Premise is interesting but the flow of the plot is lacking. Very clunky. A few too many stereotypes represented for me. I mostly enjoyed the actors, but I can’t get passed the story and the poor writing choices (or maybe it’s more poor directing choices). I wanted to like it more but it fell short for me. Good for representation of the queer community. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
3
imthenoobMar 27, 2023
No issues with the acting or directing but there were two key flaws with this film. The first being that the story was way too predictable and left little to the imagination. The second is that the film felt incredibly padded. This would haveNo issues with the acting or directing but there were two key flaws with this film. The first being that the story was way too predictable and left little to the imagination. The second is that the film felt incredibly padded. This would have made for a far better short film than a feature-length film because it was stretched out way more than it should have been, even though the film is only 100 minutes long. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
andy_indierockFeb 27, 2023
What the heck! I thought M Night would give a surprise ending like his films always do. So nothing special about this film, only regular thriller film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
BrianMcCriticApr 10, 2023
M. Night has shown the ability to make a film that captivates, shocks, keeps us guessing, and in some cases leaves us scratching our heads with how terrible it is. When it comes to Knock at the Cabin he plays it safe and what we get is aM. Night has shown the ability to make a film that captivates, shocks, keeps us guessing, and in some cases leaves us scratching our heads with how terrible it is. When it comes to Knock at the Cabin he plays it safe and what we get is a solid film that fits somewhere in the middle of his catalog. 7/10 a B Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
SHADOWSTRIKE1Jul 2, 2023
The cinematography is the only outstanding part of this film adaptation of “The Cabin at the End of the World”. Strange decisions were made in the screenplay to alter the original story unnecessarily, and make us less invested in theThe cinematography is the only outstanding part of this film adaptation of “The Cabin at the End of the World”. Strange decisions were made in the screenplay to alter the original story unnecessarily, and make us less invested in the characters. It cuts out important moments from the book that leaves the story feeling empty. The change of ending is also not a great trade. The movie’s marketing made it feel like the film was going to lean heavier into the horror aspect rather than the family (which the book focuses on), but strangely censors itself to avoid gore or anything that would leave the viewer uneasy. Overall, the film felt rushed, and the decisions felt forced. Not much left for discussion which was a strong point of the book. It’s strange, because this really shouldn’t have been hard to adapt to film. I wouldn’t say the book was amazing, but the movie is certainly a downgrade. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
SoulWarfareMar 12, 2023
It is better than his previous movie, Old, but not by much. It really feels like this movie needed more twist and turns which is strange coming from this director.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
Mauro_LanariApr 28, 2023
(Mauro Lanari)
The disaster movie would like to distinguish itself from apocalyptic cinema ignoring that the term/concept of Apocalypse was born in the Judeo-Christian tradition to indicate the end of the world as a not ruinous but salvific
(Mauro Lanari)
The disaster movie would like to distinguish itself from apocalyptic cinema ignoring that the term/concept of Apocalypse was born in the Judeo-Christian tradition to indicate the end of the world as a not ruinous but salvific cosmic event, a prerequisite for the advent of the divine and messianic kingdom. In theological terms: eschatology as soteriology. Instead, "in the cinematographic imagination, as in the common one, the word 'apocalypse' evokes more destruction than healing, more catastrophe than salvation, so that the latter assumes, for the most part, the aspect of pure escape. The subsistence of the world 'as it is', which for apocalyptic hope had appeared an unacceptable form of resignation, now risks to appear as asupreme achievement. What at the beginning seemed little, at the end it appears a lot" (Piero Stefani 2008). Shyamalan's fideistic home invasion is no exception, indeed he adds the Four Horsemen and the Christological sacrificial-expiatory rite, so he is not at all thought provoking and I have run out of popcorn supplies.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
AigleAveugleJul 9, 2023
This is the first time in my life that I threw the disc in the garbage after watching it. There is no way this is the guy who made Sixth sense, Unbreakable series, Signs or The Village. That was so soft. So easy. So worthless. SoThis is the first time in my life that I threw the disc in the garbage after watching it. There is no way this is the guy who made Sixth sense, Unbreakable series, Signs or The Village. That was so soft. So easy. So worthless. So unimaginative. So undesired. So unneeded. So forgettable. I felt ashamed that this has your name on it. I felt ashamed for you, Shyamalan. Old was boring, but this one was bad. I dont trust you anymore. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
JLauJun 11, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Dave Bautista comes to your cabin and wants you to kill a family member and if you don't, he and his followers are going to kill themselves until you do. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
jonjohn048May 10, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I remember seeing the trailers for this movie a while ago and thought the premise was solid and intriguing so I waited until it was available on Peacock since I never even heard of the book and I wanted to see if this movie could give me an idea of what makes it special and it overall, I really don't think it does the book justice because if this is really what made the book special, I'm genuinely concerned on what people have been smoking. The first thing I'll say is that all the actors in this movie are great at their role and do a great job of showcasing genuine dread and desperation in order to hook you into the movie. Also, the fact there are two men who are gay, it's something I don't have a problem with if you can help me feel like their relationship makes sense and feels earned and while it's not the whole point of the film, I feel like it does feel earned with how it showcases their past with how they're willing to help each other and when one of them dies, it feels unfair and tense since you saw what they've been through and to see their relationship end this way and leaving the other one to care for their daughter alone is enough to help you sympathize with them. The writing is pretty good and helps out to ensure the characters aren't stupid and are genuinely taking the situation very seriously. Finally, the themes it showcases are subtle but are revealed at the end helping you realize what the movie has been about the whole time. And that's about all the positives I can come up with since the movie barely left that much of an impression on me. One of the problems I have is this weird plot-hole where it's revealed at the beginning that Wen likes grasshoppers and so does Leonard, but then it never comes back later on in the film making this character trait meaningless. Speaking of Wen, she isn't used NEARLY enough in this film to make me care and considering she's a main character whose life we're supposed we're supposed to fear for, that's a major failing on the director's part. But the worst part about this movie for me is that it's revealed that one of the intruders named Redmond apparently messed up one of the guys but he dies so early that it was never hinted that he ever actually did this and the "twist" that he was the one who did it feel shoehorned in without context and probably should've been cut. Overall, the only reason I'm interested in reading the book now is only because there is no way this movie actually does the story justice on what makes it special aside from the gay couple story and the performances. So overall, if you're interested in this story, try to go in with an open mind but even then, I still don't recommend this movie. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
MalwareLordMay 16, 2023
Good Experience Good Experience Good Experience Good Experience Good Experience
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
quittit1Jul 7, 2023
If you know the plot before watching it spoils it so the most I will say is that a family gets kidnapped. The acting is great and so is the pacing. You are given a decent amount of time with most characters.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
JoA1973Feb 22, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Doesn't make the top three of Shyamalan movies but its okay. There are some story points that bothered me, things that were ignored to steer the plot, but it still worked. I just don't like when obvious logical problems aren't worked out by characters, like why don't they just leave the TV on to see the ongoing coverage if they think the events are taped or rehearsed, etc. Stuff like that irks me. Otherwise the tension and acting were good. Entertaining. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
squarefenix00May 6, 2023
Predecible, sin tensión alguna. Bien para pasar el tiempo, pero para eso hay muchísimas más y mejores opciones.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
DoctorOKAug 11, 2023
Amazing plot and premise. All actors did a superb job. Even the political agenda was done well. Very surprised by this movie and very impressed. Best M. Night movie I've seen in a WHILE
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
AREXPFeb 26, 2023
Review: Entertainment: 2/5
Acting: 3.5/5
Story: 2.5/5 Score/Screenplay/Sound: 3.5/5 Length: 4/5 Is it worth watching a second time: NO Watch it Alone or In a Group Setting: Both work fine Keywords: Christianity, Suspense, Super-Natural,
Review: Entertainment: 2/5
Acting: 3.5/5
Story: 2.5/5 Score/Screenplay/Sound: 3.5/5
Length: 4/5

Is it worth watching a second time: NO

Watch it Alone or In a Group Setting: Both work fine

Keywords: Christianity, Suspense, Super-Natural, LTGB P.S. Only thing going for it is, it keeps you guessing, but in the end, you feel like you wasted your time because the ending is bland
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
abc1234567890Mar 9, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The best of Dave Batista!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
cosmicheartApr 5, 2023
I really loved the story. It was unexpected and I think made the impact worth it. Definitely rewatching it to see if I missed any easter eggs.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
SereneSBSMay 22, 2023
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. 1. Why did they think talking to a little girl without her parents around would somehow help the situation and not freak the parents out immediately?

2. Why didn’t they ask to speak to everyone outside where they would feel comfortable? Why bash down the door?

3. Why did they not send one person, a woman or smaller man, who is non threatening to explain everything first as a buffer, instead of showing up as a gang with weapons?

4. Why did so many natural disasters that were impossible to have effects so quickly after the sacrifices keep happening? Like the planes falling from the sky? Seconds after the sacrifice, it looked like they had been falling out of the sky for at least 10 minutes or so. The flu? That would have taken days to hit the media.

5. Why did these people kill themselves over their vision? What made them so desperate to save humanity when all they got were visions? Why not assume they were experiencing some delusion or had tumors in their brain or something that would be much more reasonable of an explanation? It was never really established why these people were so convinced other than visions, which for most people, is simply not enough to end your own life in front of two husbands and their little child.

6. What happens if these cultists didn’t kill each other? Each person’s death released a plague right? So? Just don’t kill the cultists, then what happens? No plagues? Cool!

They’re like “I want to save people from dying, so I’m going to let these other people kill me, which will kill people who I don’t want to die… DERP.”

7. They never showed previous examples of this happening in the past, yet they implied it happened before. Where are the visions of this happening before? Where is the context? What could have possibly motivated these people to take it so seriously when the concept itself is unknown to most everyone on Earth? It’s so random and illogical that the behaviors of the actors itself are the plot hole.

8. Why did they suddenly believe it at the end, and have one husband kill the other when they were skeptical the whole time? “Oh, the WWE Wrestler died so that means it’s real.” No, that means you can escape now and return to civilization a normal functional person… who just saw a bunch of cult people off themselves so maybe normal + trauma.

9. Why would a lawyer/prosecutor who is very very aware of the law just go around murdering people? Specifically his own husband? Even assisted suicide is illegal so? He knows there would be horrible consequences if they were wrong. Lawyers mostly think in terms of the law, there was no legal justification for what he was doing.

10. The radio station scene at the end was incredibly upsetting. Why are they jamming to the radio after the person they both loved more than anyone just died? Hello? Hello? Hello???
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
schtoopididiotMay 24, 2023
M. Night still has some dialogue issues to figure out, and it doesn't alwasy make thee most sense and can come off as boring, but with a tightly written script and a handful of very good acting performances, I'd say you have a job well done,M. Night still has some dialogue issues to figure out, and it doesn't alwasy make thee most sense and can come off as boring, but with a tightly written script and a handful of very good acting performances, I'd say you have a job well done, Shamylan. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews