Warner Bros. Pictures | Release Date: October 21, 2005
8.5
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 500 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
434
Mixed:
34
Negative:
32
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
3
DamienA.Nov 12, 2005
Great movie if you think two guys kissing is hilarious... or two guys seeing an 'ugly and fat' mental patient naked puts you in stitches... or if a gay investigator's cell ringtone being a gay anthem (I Will Survive?) is your Great movie if you think two guys kissing is hilarious... or two guys seeing an 'ugly and fat' mental patient naked puts you in stitches... or if a gay investigator's cell ringtone being a gay anthem (I Will Survive?) is your idea of HA HA.... What I hate about this film is that it presents itself as so 'knowing' and 'ironic' that it thinks it can do anything it wants without copping any flack... GOD! I felt ill a lot of the time with the stupid jokes... and finding out that it's directed by the guy who wrote the lethal weapon franchise makes a lot of sense... Yes, perhaps I'm a film snob but I really think this is a film by a macho, sexist, elitist, juvenile mind. Yes there are good things in the film.. the acting, the energy, some of the jokes... but I really feel that this film really is just an updated Lethal Weapon made to please a cynical modern audience. I don't see many Hollywood films... but I thought this might be in the quality of Pulp Fiction, Usual Suspects, Mullholland Dr... How wrong I was. More Naked Gun than anything else I can think of. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
1
PaulWNov 27, 2005
Just awful..plain boring. You just don't care what happens to the characters in the film and whats the story with the script ??!! Kilmer looks like hes put three stones on and is just going through the motions in this film..east money Just awful..plain boring. You just don't care what happens to the characters in the film and whats the story with the script ??!! Kilmer looks like hes put three stones on and is just going through the motions in this film..east money for him as hes doesnt even have to try and act in this turkey.. Avoid at all costs...I actually want to leave the cinema it was that bad...go and watch "Crash" Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
0
Lambo442May 29, 2016
Couldn't get pass the first five minutes of this gimmicky nonsense. It jumps from scene to scene, from plot thread to plot thread so rapidly, you completely lose any sense of continuum. The narrator addresses the viewer directly, which isCouldn't get pass the first five minutes of this gimmicky nonsense. It jumps from scene to scene, from plot thread to plot thread so rapidly, you completely lose any sense of continuum. The narrator addresses the viewer directly, which is jarring and takes you out of the fictional world, reminding you you're watching a film. It's also very unbelievable and hohoho Val Kilmer plays a gay man - how novel and funny. The first scene he's in involves another man discussing his gayness with him, just a hint of the hijinks to come. The Nice Guys looks like it will be much better than this pretentious crap. Expand
0 of 10 users found this helpful010
All this user's reviews
3
ourtimehascomeOct 22, 2017
Kiss Kiss Bang Bang might be Shane Black's worst film. Its narration is jarring and annoying, and its characters are unlikable. None of the actors seem to show any amount of range; Downey Jr. might as well be playing himself. Black's primaryKiss Kiss Bang Bang might be Shane Black's worst film. Its narration is jarring and annoying, and its characters are unlikable. None of the actors seem to show any amount of range; Downey Jr. might as well be playing himself. Black's primary problem is he thinks his cleverness is enough to carry the plot, and it's not. It is merely a diversion from the lack of truly original ideas. A bunch of incoherent threads are haphazardly linked together. None of them meaning much in the lackluster ending. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
3
shschDec 20, 2005
This film tried much too hard to be cute and it didn't work for me. I thought the hero/narrator played by Robert Downey Jr was especially irritating and the plot overly confusing and stupid. If you're looking to waste a couple of This film tried much too hard to be cute and it didn't work for me. I thought the hero/narrator played by Robert Downey Jr was especially irritating and the plot overly confusing and stupid. If you're looking to waste a couple of hours at a comedy, go see the Ice Harvest. Not a much better movie, but at least I found John Cusack somewhat sympathetic, not obnoxious, as the hero here. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
MattSDec 9, 2005
Just not very interesting. The narration was annoying and the ending was silly.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
1
leefMar 5, 2008
Had a good premise, but i turned it off after 30 min...like ebert said...it was spinning its wheels, but for me the dialogue wasn't funny.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
2
EricD.Oct 15, 2006
I wanted to like this movie, but it didn't happen for me. I like Val Kilmer and Robert Downey Jr. but thought this was just plain bad.
0 of 0 users found this helpful