Warner Bros. | Release Date: May 12, 2017
7.2
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 637 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
436
Mixed:
135
Negative:
66
Watch Now
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
10
domthom1016May 12, 2017
Looking at the mixed reviews, I was pleasantly surprised when seeing King Arthur. Even my anti history and fantasy movie girlfriend admitted that she liked it and can't wait till the sequel. For anyone that reads this, give the movie aLooking at the mixed reviews, I was pleasantly surprised when seeing King Arthur. Even my anti history and fantasy movie girlfriend admitted that she liked it and can't wait till the sequel. For anyone that reads this, give the movie a chance. You may think it's not for you, but I'm telling you, you'll be pleasantly surprised and will enjoy some point of the ride that is King Arthur Legend of the Sword. Expand
33 of 51 users found this helpful3318
All this user's reviews
10
helicopterpiratMay 24, 2017
Recently I've seen Alien Covenant, Guardians of the Galaxy 2, John Wick 2, and Kong.

I liked King Arthur more than all of those movies. Not that I disliked the movies above, but out of all of them, if I had to watch one movie again, it
Recently I've seen Alien Covenant, Guardians of the Galaxy 2, John Wick 2, and Kong.

I liked King Arthur more than all of those movies. Not that I disliked the movies above, but out of all of them, if I had to watch one movie again, it would be this one.

I've seen other Guy Richie movies, and I've seen other King Arthur movies(probably all of them). I loved this movie. I can't explain it, I feel like I shouldn't...but I do. A lot of the the reviews here bring up some good points, but despite that, I really enjoyed the movie. I felt the story was solid, the pacing was good, the cinematography was great, as was the soundtrack.

I'm sure there are plenty of ways to pick this movie apart, but for my part, I had a great time.
Expand
8 of 12 users found this helpful84
All this user's reviews
7
Faust-RSIAug 19, 2017
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Pretty interesting story and good visuals, but sometimes the plot is hard to understand and there are too many plot-holes. Negroids, Mongoloids and Indians in England of X century??? A mage that could kill the main antagonist ALONE long time ago with that giant snake (as well as his army), but did nothing? That's a bit too much. Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
9
impartialreviewMay 25, 2017
This is not the King Arthur you have ever see. No cute boy in the woods or sappy musical. This is the story of using the sword, controlling the sword within the action and good story line. The graphics are outstanding and the acting is good.This is not the King Arthur you have ever see. No cute boy in the woods or sappy musical. This is the story of using the sword, controlling the sword within the action and good story line. The graphics are outstanding and the acting is good. Some have complained that it is not historically accurate. What is historical about pulling a sword from stone. Yo will enjoy the settings, the types of characters and unpredictable endings. Great for dates, taking the grand-kids as well as mature audiences. Expand
4 of 7 users found this helpful43
All this user's reviews
10
DavidMolinaMay 13, 2017
I loved this movie! I just created a Metacritic account to help do it justice, given that most critics gave it poor ratings and reviews. Critics please, take into consideration that there is a public that love this kind of movies. PLEASE,I loved this movie! I just created a Metacritic account to help do it justice, given that most critics gave it poor ratings and reviews. Critics please, take into consideration that there is a public that love this kind of movies. PLEASE, give them fair reviews accordingly!

This movie is a MASTERPIECE. The story is relatively simple (given that it's inspired by a centuries-old tale), but the excecution is outstanding. It has almost every part of the King Arthur mythos, although there could have been more Merlin, but it wasn't necessary to complete the experience. The actors are incredible... All of them. The environments are spectacular and beautiful. There is a lot of fantasy elements that are wonderful as well.

The action and adventure are executed perfectly, as expected of the amazing director Guy Ritchie... IT EXCEEDED my expectations BY FAR! It has you on the edge of your seat every second, and even a lot of the sequences are absolutely jaw-dropping.

The story is conclusive but it has GREAT potential for follow ups, and I can't wait to see them. I hope this movie gets enough support from fans so there can be a sequel. I reccomend this movie to any fan of: Guy Ritchie, the King Arthur mythos, The Lord of the Rings, The Hobbit, Pirates of the Caribbean and the also ufairly reviewed but absolutely great Warcraft movie.

EXCALIBUR!!
Expand
9 of 17 users found this helpful98
All this user's reviews
8
BorgorosMay 12, 2017
Finally a movie about a legendary character that doesn't use too much time on the origin-story. Cool action, music, characters that are true to themselves and a exiting story that uses the film's playtime for what it's worth.
8 of 16 users found this helpful88
All this user's reviews
10
zu-foxMay 12, 2017
Honestly, throughout the whole film I was sitting and smiling like a child. I loved fantasy books of 80-s and this film gave me exact same feelings. Some people find it to be historically inaccurate, but it's an action movie, a fantasy move,Honestly, throughout the whole film I was sitting and smiling like a child. I loved fantasy books of 80-s and this film gave me exact same feelings. Some people find it to be historically inaccurate, but it's an action movie, a fantasy move, one that entertains. I loved characters in it, I loved jokes (though, not many people were laughing in the cinema) and I can tell that that's the movie I would gladly rewatch and buy a blu-ray copy once it's out. It's ok that different people have different tastes, but it almost seems that nowadays hits are either Marvel movies or soon-to-become-mass-market author movies. Expand
8 of 16 users found this helpful88
All this user's reviews
10
djmine46May 13, 2017
I have an obsession for sword-fighting and fantasy like Game of Thrones. This movie exceeded my expectations, it played with my emotions and the action in this movie was stunning!
8 of 16 users found this helpful88
All this user's reviews
10
sshinkleMay 17, 2017
I was honestly shocked by all of the negative critic reviews for this movie after going to see it. Reading through a few blurbs of them, they seem to be upset that Guy Ritchie made a film that looks like a Guy Ritchie film. for one, I am gladI was honestly shocked by all of the negative critic reviews for this movie after going to see it. Reading through a few blurbs of them, they seem to be upset that Guy Ritchie made a film that looks like a Guy Ritchie film. for one, I am glad that I decided to not listen to critics this time and just went and saw it. It delivered exactly what I was hoping it would. It was fast paced and fun, with a great cast and beyond incredible music. I think this movie is a perfect example of how flawed our system of rating and critiquing movies is these days. People look at a low number on metacritic or rotten tomatoes and then don't even bother with the movie or even reading the why of the low scores. This movie didn't earn its low score or low box office numbers. If you want an exciting, action packed Guy Ritchie film, this is one delivers. Expand
8 of 16 users found this helpful88
All this user's reviews
10
XendomMay 16, 2017
Beautiful movie! Photography is exceptional, engaging music and well-characterized actors. Guy Richie is a great director. Can't understand the hate from critics. Go see it!
7 of 14 users found this helpful77
All this user's reviews
10
forevervagueMay 16, 2017
The movie was great. I loved it. I actually made an account just to review because I'm so surprised about the rating. It's stupid that only the critics score displays on google when most of the profit come from the public.. I haven't enjoyedThe movie was great. I loved it. I actually made an account just to review because I'm so surprised about the rating. It's stupid that only the critics score displays on google when most of the profit come from the public.. I haven't enjoyed a movie like I did this one in ages. Expand
6 of 12 users found this helpful66
All this user's reviews
10
KNDLAINMay 25, 2017
This movie is EPIC!! I had to go watch it again and REALLY want to see it a third time just in case I missed something. Did the critics even watch this? I read an article today an why this movie "flopped" and the writer even states that heThis movie is EPIC!! I had to go watch it again and REALLY want to see it a third time just in case I missed something. Did the critics even watch this? I read an article today an why this movie "flopped" and the writer even states that he never watched it. If there is something to blame for the "flop" of this movie, it was the marketing it received. After seeing the previews, I thought I might go see it but it wasn't at the top of my list. In fact, we only watched it because there was nothing else out that we hadn't seen. And now...this movie has topped my list of favorite movies of all time. It has elements like 300 and Lord of the Rings. I bought the soundtrack the minute I left the theater and have already pre-ordered this on VUDU. If you believe the critics, you are cheating yourself out of seeing one AMAZING movie. Expand
6 of 12 users found this helpful66
All this user's reviews
7
bloopbymimiMay 19, 2017
King Arthur: Legend of the Sword is, you know… an interpretation of the story of King Arthur; as in Knights of the Round Table, Merlin the Magician, etc., King Arthur. It’s one of those stories that has been told many, many times and in manyKing Arthur: Legend of the Sword is, you know… an interpretation of the story of King Arthur; as in Knights of the Round Table, Merlin the Magician, etc., King Arthur. It’s one of those stories that has been told many, many times and in many ways on film, including animation, satire, fantasy/action/adventure/drama. And I totally had to go see it after I heard Sandy Kenyon’s review, which was just too sad to even be funny.

Where this film goes wrong lies with two crucial elements of this movie are just “off.”

#1 – Director. Not that I don’t care for Guy’s work. He’s okay with me. But here he imposes his sleek, modern style of film making into this late 5th-early 6th century tale and the result is at times it works well and is charming, and at other times it’s a painfully bad fit. I use the word “imposes” because during the course of the entire movie things just feel very forced; when had his style been “infused” into the film it might have flowed more effortlessly. For example, in one scene Charlie Hunnam walks across the set with all the swag of Jax Teller and it is as if Jax Teller were playing King Arthur! No! No! No! Nobody in 5th century England was likely walking with a bop in their step; I mean it’s possible, but not probable. Little things like this made the movie laughable at times (and I’m not talking about the good kind of laughable, or the moments that were intended to be funny – and there were a few), and with just a bit more care and effort, we all could have had a better movie.

#2 – The screenplay. Guy helped co-write the screenplay, and the story felt as though it had more than a few hands on it – as if it had been a bit overwritten. This story didn’t quite know if it wanted to be historical, mystical, beautiful, comical, dramatic, tragic, epic – it was just all over the place and it did not work as all of these things at once. The balance in the story just wasn’t there. The story itself is definitely stale, having been told many times over the years, but the attempt to “freshen” the material with Ritchie’s style was a mistake, unless he was going to modernize the setting or just make the characters straight-gangster and make an R-Rated version. Now THAT would be a movie worth making and one I would be more likely to pay to see. I must say that this is the most multicultural cast of characters I have ever seen in the telling of this particular story, and I appreciated that. It is a beautiful thing to see people of color working on the big screen – BUT, it did absolutely nothing to modernized the story in any meaningful way (because the setting was still 5th century England), nor did it change the story in a way that made it more interesting or entertaining. Someone else may feel differently about it. Me personally, I don’t care if the entire cast is whatever nationality, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or whatever, as long as the movie is good. And as far as the story itself, it may have worked on paper, and in theory I can even see where it might work, but the execution fails.

While watching Mr. Kenyon’s review he made mention of the terrible acting by David Beckham (I believe he mentions another critic claimed it is some of the worst acting he’d ever seen on film or something to that effect). But let me just say, Becks (see how I refer to David Beckham as though we’ve met…) only had two lines and they were two terribly written lines. The worst part of this movie by far for me was listening to Astrid Bergès-Frisbey as The Mage. I thought she was absolutely and tragically, terrible. This character has no presence, no energy (as she tried to be “ethereal” and came off as horror movie creepy), no emotion (yes, I understand she is The Mage, but give us something) and her accent was super-annoying. I mean, to point out one character with such a small role, just because it’s Becks and exclude this horrible, large (she is billed second on IMDB) role from criticism, is unfathomable to me. Now I’m critiquing the critic! I’m done with this movie!

What saves the movie from being a total wash out is the wardrobe (particularly the well tailored clothes on Hunnam), the cinematography/camera work, the choreography of the battle scenes, the effects, some of the acting, the jokes, and I gotta tell ya – looking at Charlie Hunnam for two hours will never a problem for me (unless something goes horribly, horribly wrong, heaven forbid, and God bless him).
Expand
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
All this user's reviews
9
yezoMay 21, 2017
I personally enjoyed the movie. I think it is comical, clever and imaginative.
It gave me a sense of a magical world.
I am aware the professional review dislike the film because of various reasons but I believe there is a reason I am giving a
I personally enjoyed the movie. I think it is comical, clever and imaginative.
It gave me a sense of a magical world.
I am aware the professional review dislike the film because of various reasons but I believe there is a reason I am giving a user review.
Expand
3 of 6 users found this helpful33
All this user's reviews
8
KingslyaAug 2, 2017
You know how sometimes you watch a movie, without reading any reviews or hearing very little about it, and after watching it you say, that was pretty good? That's exactly how I felt about King Arthur Legend of the Sword.

Further to watching
You know how sometimes you watch a movie, without reading any reviews or hearing very little about it, and after watching it you say, that was pretty good? That's exactly how I felt about King Arthur Legend of the Sword.

Further to watching it, I read reviews and have to disagree with most of the critics out there, they didn't like it, and I disagree on the points they had made. I am not saying its the best movie in 2017 nor the best Arthur movie ever (Disneys The Sword in the Stone, and Excalibur are still the best) but it's got a fresh look on Arthurian Legend and much better than recent previous attempts.

This is a Guy Ritchie movie, and the director has an announced way of how dialogue is done in his movies, as well as filming action scenes, and I really personally enjoy it. Who didn't like Lock Stock and Two Smoking Barrels? Witty colourful, large cast, street smart, and ultimately always ALWAYS cool, and all of that we can see in King Arthur.
If people haven't realised it yet, the movie industry is going through what I like to call the continuity revolution - the one-off movie hit doesn't work anymore, especially not on fantasy or sci-fi. Everyone wants to like a character and see their development, and why should King Arthur be different? It's Legend, and there are many Arthurian stories which have never been portrayed on the big screen, so I am glad that it looks like a franchise.
Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
7
TyranianApr 13, 2019
Ritchie at his best, this has awesome action and visuals, cool music and all Ritchie's trademarks.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
LeZeeNov 29, 2017
A different take on the sword in the stone!

This one came with a little surprise. I know it was a Guy Ritchie film and I had enjoyed all his previous flicks. But for some reasons, I felt I'm not that interested in this. Even trailer looked
A different take on the sword in the stone!

This one came with a little surprise. I know it was a Guy Ritchie film and I had enjoyed all his previous flicks. But for some reasons, I felt I'm not that interested in this. Even trailer looked okayish. Watching the film now I realised that I've totally misjudged it. Still not a masterpiece, but a much better entertainer. The graphics were awesome. The settings were totally encouraging to glue to it. The story, stunts, with some of the slow- motions, very detailed and muscularly enchanting.

Everybody knows the basic storyline of King Arthur. In this, it opened with two brothers feud and following a young man grew up in a brothel. When the city slowly gripped with the myth that the legendary prince would return to the crown, now the king, Vortigern vows to find him first and end the threat. But what comes after him was beyond his expectation. He has to finish it off what he had failed years ago. On the other hand Arthur has all the support, particularly the legendary sword passed on to him by his father.

I had liked the Disney animated film back when I was a kid. This was completely a different film. For the live-action, it stood and delivered what viewers had expected. The music was another advantage. All the actors were good. The rise of Charlie Hunnan. His recent films were pushing him to the next level. Surely a lookout star. Despite a poor box office, it is a much better film. Once again the film critics got it all wrong. Good for one time watch.

7/10
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
RODIMUSNov 7, 2018
Looking at user ratings. And comparing this with the assessment of the administration of the site. METACRITIK's assessment is sucked. They are not reliable. Do not rely on their assessments. And the movie is great, they are not goodies andLooking at user ratings. And comparing this with the assessment of the administration of the site. METACRITIK's assessment is sucked. They are not reliable. Do not rely on their assessments. And the movie is great, they are not goodies and special effects straight from the mega. He gives him comfortably 8.0 It's a pity I watched him so badly. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
kimikazioJun 7, 2019
Really good movie. Won't be too memorable but you'll enjoy every minute of it.
It's believable, it has a fantastic and magic side really well done. The cast and the acting was great too. The storyline it's not the best in the world, but
Really good movie. Won't be too memorable but you'll enjoy every minute of it.
It's believable, it has a fantastic and magic side really well done. The cast and the acting was great too. The storyline it's not the best in the world, but everything makes sense and it's well carried.
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
RalfbergsSep 29, 2017
Guy Ritchie as usual provides, even though this is not the best of his movies. Still great movie and an even greater soundtrack. Has some funny moments throughout too.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
spencieOct 23, 2017
Highly entertaining film with a great performance and a great lead character. The side characters are all boring though and the story isn't anything fresh or new. The visuals are crazy and different and so are the action sequences. DirectorHighly entertaining film with a great performance and a great lead character. The side characters are all boring though and the story isn't anything fresh or new. The visuals are crazy and different and so are the action sequences. Director Guy Ritchie adds a lot of fun, quippy dialog, and a lot of quick, funky editing to make the movie very enjoyable. The movie is a blast and nothing else. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
apannilssonJul 29, 2018
It's good! I wish the slightly odd pace of narrative and writing could have taken a bigger part. Those segments were funny and gave it a unique and quirky sort of storytelling. Unfortunately some parts become very typical. EspeciallyIt's good! I wish the slightly odd pace of narrative and writing could have taken a bigger part. Those segments were funny and gave it a unique and quirky sort of storytelling. Unfortunately some parts become very typical. Especially surrounding some old and well used story tropes etc. So not the most original story. Good characters though. Also might have overused special effects at some points. It just looks like a video game in some parts. Kinda breaks the spell. Very enjoyable though. Shame there won't be more. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
9
whostosayJan 9, 2018
If you are one of those movie fans who salivate over exuberant, picturesque period sets that are a marvel to watch beginning to end, then this is the movie for you. And although the flash card montages were off putting at times, this is oneIf you are one of those movie fans who salivate over exuberant, picturesque period sets that are a marvel to watch beginning to end, then this is the movie for you. And although the flash card montages were off putting at times, this is one good romp of an entertainment. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
DominArsenDec 8, 2018
Le Roi Arthur: La Légende d'Excalibur
Je l'attendais pour une seule raison l'acteur principal ! #SonsOfAnarchy
Arthur est devenu "Moi je fais comme ça! Si tu n'es pas content retourne chez ta mère" ce qui fait qu’à part la phrase précédente
Le Roi Arthur: La Légende d'Excalibur
Je l'attendais pour une seule raison l'acteur principal ! #SonsOfAnarchy
Arthur est devenu "Moi je fais comme ça! Si tu n'es pas content retourne chez ta mère" ce qui fait qu’à part la phrase précédente et quelque défaut minime rien ne m’a déçu!
Mais ce qui m’a surpris c'est la photographie; certains plans sont magnifiques.
Et les effets spéciaux sont impressionnants au niveau de la composition. Ils sont extrêmement savoureux, tellement qu'on en redemande #RalentiStopMotionPsychédélic.
Une musique EPIC à tout instant j'ai adoré la Soundtrack faire du vieux avec du récent c'est chouette.
Bref aller voir ce film juste pour le plaisir des yeux et des oreilles (si vous aimez l'Epic)
Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
9
PerryDaviesJan 4, 2018
It does not follow the true story, no. BUT WHO CARES, Its a great movie. Enjoy it for what it is. I was expecting a flop because of the reviews and totally loved it. Its a mix of Excalibur , 300 and Snatch. And it worked for me. IIt does not follow the true story, no. BUT WHO CARES, Its a great movie. Enjoy it for what it is. I was expecting a flop because of the reviews and totally loved it. Its a mix of Excalibur , 300 and Snatch. And it worked for me. I seriously don't understand some of the reviews. Sit back and enjoy it Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
9
CoKronakanMar 6, 2018
This movie is very untrue to the original legend of King Arthur. I mean sure there are some elements keep the same, but it's highly westernized. And very well at that. It lights a spark that wasn't there until, know to draw in new audiences.This movie is very untrue to the original legend of King Arthur. I mean sure there are some elements keep the same, but it's highly westernized. And very well at that. It lights a spark that wasn't there until, know to draw in new audiences. Also the protagonists charismatic character only helps this, as well as some amazing directing sequences. It's very entertaining, very well paced. This new approach on the Legends of the Sword is also welcomed and makes this not that cliche. Very well acted, and shot. A very good movie. Definitely worth a watch! Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
usmanmasoodMar 5, 2018
**** the critics! The movie was awesome!!!! .....................................
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
8
SirKrustyMar 8, 2018
Definitely one of the better movies of 2017, I am very sad that they cancelled the sequels. Amazing Visual Effects and Battle Scenes make this movie a must see for anyone looking for a great Action/Fantasy movie. Plot is sometimes a littleDefinitely one of the better movies of 2017, I am very sad that they cancelled the sequels. Amazing Visual Effects and Battle Scenes make this movie a must see for anyone looking for a great Action/Fantasy movie. Plot is sometimes a little hard to follow, and if you are looking for a pure historically accurate movie don't see this Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
VovandemortJan 3, 2019
Great movie, bad for not seeing the sequel. Very cool style. Guy Ritchie makes a great movie.I do not understand why such a low score of critics .. Money is not brought?
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
9
denisgrechkoMar 30, 2019
Excellent film. Which captures and does not let go. Very dynamic and interesting. Especially cool music and shots of fights. Waiting for the continuation
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
9
LadyViper_23Jun 19, 2020
The critics' review just don't make justice to this movie. It's epic, funny, fast and really enjoiable. It's a shame we won't see a sequel. Charlie Hunnam is perfect for this role and Guy Richie's vision for these franchiase could have beenThe critics' review just don't make justice to this movie. It's epic, funny, fast and really enjoiable. It's a shame we won't see a sequel. Charlie Hunnam is perfect for this role and Guy Richie's vision for these franchiase could have been epic. I expecially love the photography and the soundrack. Go see it! Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
AceTrigger94May 12, 2017
Don't trust the critics this time. This movie is probably gonna flops but 10 years from now, it's going to be a cult movie and people are going to realized that this movie was actually awesome to begin with.
8 of 17 users found this helpful89
All this user's reviews
10
NarthilMay 13, 2017
This was a great movie that surprised me in several ways. It's like a hybrid between a video game movie, an en epic movie and a dark movie. Different style, completely underrated. Good surprise.
6 of 13 users found this helpful67
All this user's reviews
10
RKmericaMay 16, 2017
Saw this last night after screening was overbooked couple weeks ago. It was a great movie... from beginning to end. Regarding the bad reviews? Apparently, none of the critics have seen a Guy Ritchie movie. Maybe they should try watching oneSaw this last night after screening was overbooked couple weeks ago. It was a great movie... from beginning to end. Regarding the bad reviews? Apparently, none of the critics have seen a Guy Ritchie movie. Maybe they should try watching one before throwing eggs at this one. Just a minor suggestion for some clueless a-holes that call themselves movie critics. Good tip: start with Snatch and go from there. Expand
5 of 11 users found this helpful56
All this user's reviews
8
TheVilonius15May 14, 2017
Me agrada cuando se intenta hacer algo distinto y resulta de buena manera. Quizás las técnicas usadas por Guy Ritchie y su equipo, no son tan novedosas en el cine general, muchas de estas técnicas ya han sido utilizadas antes en películasMe agrada cuando se intenta hacer algo distinto y resulta de buena manera. Quizás las técnicas usadas por Guy Ritchie y su equipo, no son tan novedosas en el cine general, muchas de estas técnicas ya han sido utilizadas antes en películas independientes y otros montajes audiovisuales, pero esta es una de las pocas veces en las que podemos ver muchas de estas técnicas, y más encima bien hechas y aplicadas, en una película de alto presupuesto del muy criticado actual Hollywood.

La película está fuertemente desarrollada a través de montajes, prácticamente todo el desarrollo de la historia ocurre a través de ellos, esto no es nada malo, por el contrario, la mayoría de ellos están bien pensados y desarrollados. Sin adentrarme mucho y solo tomando en cuenta el montaje inicial, vemos el crecimiento del protagonista desde su infancia hasta su adultez, la secuencia no se hace más larga a dos minutos y logra dejar muy claro quién es, que es lo que sabe y que es lo que aprecia, además ser una introducción al estilo en cuanto a música y ambientación. Este tipo de montajes se repite a lo largo de toda la película, y si bien en algunas ocasiones puede resultar abrumador para los espectadores que no están atentos, la técnica utilizada no hace más que hacerla única en el género medieval, funciona excelente para las escenas de acción, el desarrollo de personajes y también de la narrativa, logrando presentar en tan solo dos horas y seis minutos, una historia que perfectamente podría abarcar toda una temporada de una buena serie. Hablando de buenas series y entendiendo que toda creación surge a través del remix. Todo fanático de Game of Thrones rápidamente se dará cuenta de que hay muchos elementos de la serie presentes en la película. Ya sean las locaciones abiertas, reales y silvestres (dejando de lado el abuso de CGI para crear estos ambientes), la fijación y detención en la población y actividades medievales, un similar trato con los personajes, y las actuaciones que intentan apoderase de un extraño tipo de acento británico (sobre todo a la hora de decir “mi lord”). Demás esta mencionar que, para hacerlo menos sutil, hay dos actores de la serie presentes en la película, Michael McElhatton (Roose Boton) y Aidan Gillen (Petyr Baelish), uno ahora interpretando un papel menor y otro como personaje secundario. Solo falto agregar un poco más de “gore” y teníamos al primo lejano de la serie en la pantalla grande.

Terminando con algunas especificaciones técnicas y una breve conclusión. “El Rey Arturo”, logra crear su propio estilo a la hora de contarse a sí misma, posee un soundtrack un tanto peculiar para su género, y el mayor elogio se lo lleva su dirección, aplicar toma experimentales y poco regulares, sin duda marcan la identidad durante toda la película. Ideas que no solo son sacadas del cine, sino que de los videojuegos también, God of War y Shadow of the Colossus son un claro ejemplo de ello. En fin, esta nueva película es totalmente recomendable, tanto para los más dedicados y atentos al séptimo arte, como para el espectador común que solo busca entretenimiento cinematográfico.

https://jpvilo15blog.wordpress.com/2017/05/14/resena-el-rey-arturo-la-leyenda-de-la-espada/
Expand
5 of 11 users found this helpful56
All this user's reviews
9
pendratMay 15, 2017
Loved the movie from start to finish. Great music, nice banter and a few really cool scenes. A bit heavy on cgi at times and nothing too surprising plot wise but overall a great movie. Can't understand the hate from critics. A strong eight inLoved the movie from start to finish. Great music, nice banter and a few really cool scenes. A bit heavy on cgi at times and nothing too surprising plot wise but overall a great movie. Can't understand the hate from critics. A strong eight in my books, giving it a nine just for King Arthur. Expand
5 of 12 users found this helpful57
All this user's reviews
10
unfhuntMay 19, 2017
The story of the king Arthur is a legend so many times spoken, i really glad to see something fresh and daring like this on. This is like a new dark fantasy wave. Such modern middle ages. Full of stylish and solemn moments that touched me soThe story of the king Arthur is a legend so many times spoken, i really glad to see something fresh and daring like this on. This is like a new dark fantasy wave. Such modern middle ages. Full of stylish and solemn moments that touched me so deeply with the help of a good music choice. I even watched it twice and i realy don't understand so many negative critics reviews. That is unfair and that's what motivates me to write my one review to the glory of justice! Expand
4 of 10 users found this helpful46
All this user's reviews
7
TheQuietGamerAug 18, 2017
A movie that wants so badly to be the next Lord of the Rings. Unfortunately it's plot is delivered in a choppy and inconcise manner as it tries to cram way too much plotting into a roughly two hour movie, so it doesn't have the narrativeA movie that wants so badly to be the next Lord of the Rings. Unfortunately it's plot is delivered in a choppy and inconcise manner as it tries to cram way too much plotting into a roughly two hour movie, so it doesn't have the narrative chops to back it up. Guy Ritchie does manage to fill the movie with a lot of impressive action, gorgeous special effects, and a great sense of style. So while it is not destined to rise to the heights of Peter Jackson's excellent trilogy of Tolkien adaptations, it at least has legs to stand on in the entertainment department. It provides an interesting new take on the King Arthur legend.

Giant mythological creatures are around every corner and Excalibur gives Arthur some crazy super powers this time around for some reason. Mix in some delightfully sarcastic and genuinely funny dialog and you've got a movie where there is rarely a dull moment. You still have to sit through the fairly standard plot and Arthur groaning in that typical reluctant hero sort of way. We've all seen it before. although we haven't seen it delivered this awkwardly before. The movie's habit of cutting back and forth in time during several scenes is visually impressive, but jarring and at times a bit confusing from a story standpoint. It's also worth noting that this is the most dude-bro version of King Arthur we've had since Starz Camelot series. Charlie Hunman does make this incarnation more likable than Jamie Campbell Bower though. He's got genuine grit to back up that smart mouth and streetwise, rugged charm.

A touch ham-fisted with it's plot and world-building, Guy Ritchie's take on Arthurian legend does manage to be more fun and exciting than it has any right to be. It's understandable why the professional critics hated it. It is kind of one of those overblown, spectacle driven, and kind of dumb fantasy movies that are usually duds all the way around. However in Ritchie's capable hands "Legend of the Sword" manages to avoid the usual pitfalls and elevates itself to simply good, flashy fun. It's clear that perhaps the director had loftier ambitions in mind, but at the end of the day I'm just glad he managed to get simply entertaining out of what could have been a potential train wreck.
Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
8
normypJul 1, 2017
That film was great. Best I've seen in a long time even if I realised towards the end it's basically the plot of the Lion King but set in a medieval magic world. Still, it's got some great editing, good usage of special effects and is prettyThat film was great. Best I've seen in a long time even if I realised towards the end it's basically the plot of the Lion King but set in a medieval magic world. Still, it's got some great editing, good usage of special effects and is pretty funny. It won't leave your jaw wide open but it will satisfy you if you want an action medieval film to watch. Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
8
eva3si0nAug 24, 2017
I don't understand why the movie was carried by critics, the movie has turned out excellent if of course to reject a tolerance subject (from where **** at 11-12 a century in England?). Excellent style of Guy Richie. There is no plot as it,I don't understand why the movie was carried by critics, the movie has turned out excellent if of course to reject a tolerance subject (from where **** at 11-12 a century in England?). Excellent style of Guy Richie. There is no plot as it, but as the tie of the trilogy will descend. As usual Jude Law has played excellently. Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
7
Creeper3455May 22, 2017
I'm surprised by how critics slammed this movie with so much hate,because this was a perfectly watchable movie.I mean,it has the flaws,but other than that,it's still watchable. We can notice how it's hardly tring to tell the story of KingI'm surprised by how critics slammed this movie with so much hate,because this was a perfectly watchable movie.I mean,it has the flaws,but other than that,it's still watchable. We can notice how it's hardly tring to tell the story of King Arthur in a serious tone while making the audience laugh. When 1st act begins,i had no idea what was going on,but then 2nd act rolls in,and we now understand what's happening . The 3rd act was okay,and that's where the CG becomes horrendous (well,sort of). The CG was fine,but it's a mess when 3rd act goes on. All of the performances were decent,the only good actor in this movie was Jude Law. The action scenes were okay to watch,but at some point,it's the same thing over and over. But in the end 'King Arthur Legend Of The Sword' was surprisingly enjoyable,with a decent cast,an intriguing story and some decent effects. Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
10
MovieLover1988Jun 2, 2017
Fabulous movie to see on the Big Screen...Critics were ridiculously hard on this film. It is great entertainment, exciting and thrilling with amazing effects perfect for the big screen. Acting was great...Money well spent! Went to see itFabulous movie to see on the Big Screen...Critics were ridiculously hard on this film. It is great entertainment, exciting and thrilling with amazing effects perfect for the big screen. Acting was great...Money well spent! Went to see it with ages 25, 28, 32, 60 and 63. Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
10
FIONARJul 12, 2017
Honestly I created this account only to write review about this movie. During summer all the other movies I have watched, King Arthur is my most favorite. I love everything on this movie, and the soundtrack is amazing. I really do not haveHonestly I created this account only to write review about this movie. During summer all the other movies I have watched, King Arthur is my most favorite. I love everything on this movie, and the soundtrack is amazing. I really do not have any idea why there are so many bad critics reviews. If you watch this movie, you will know how entertaining the movie is. This is a kind of movie that you can watch again and again and never feel bored. I have watch three times already and I am sure gonna watch it again. Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
10
ArgonautMay 17, 2017
Most of the critics' statements are just bad excuses for them being unable to stomach the storytelling of Guy Ritchie. Or they are simply biased against fantasy.
Not tr00 story? Seen through Rithcie's filter? Common, that's the whole point:
Most of the critics' statements are just bad excuses for them being unable to stomach the storytelling of Guy Ritchie. Or they are simply biased against fantasy.
Not tr00 story? Seen through Rithcie's filter? Common, that's the whole point: we have already seen so-called true versions of King Arthur, we already know the story, we want the execution. And it's a damn fine one.
Underdeveloped secondary chars? Yes, it all revolves around protagonist and antagonist, it is a classic fairy tale. Not a 5-season series here. All supporting actors deliver strong performances.
Too much VFX? Go and see yet another super-hero cocktail you gave a good score last week, was it really any better than this fantasy film? VFX is inseparable part of all uncanny narratives, live with it.
Bad writing? Well, I might be interested to see a version where they talk in verse, but I bet the street talk was much more common in dark ages. The king and his buddies are street-wise, not university wise.
Finally, I think this version of King Arthur is as good and as valid as any before it. The film is good, go see it. I do not believe in sequels, but for the first time in 10 years, I am actually craving one.
Oh, and I am very glad it did not steer away from dark-fantasy tale to e.g. throw-in some second-hand romance. There's simply no time for romancing, when you have to learn how to fight your demons.
Expand
5 of 13 users found this helpful58
All this user's reviews
10
wakeboardjakeMay 17, 2017
This movie contains one of the most accelerated, vibrant scenes that synced along with Daniel Pemberton's amazing music makes for one of my top favorite movie experiences, EVER! BOY Oh Howdy! I almost listened to critics and didn't go see it.This movie contains one of the most accelerated, vibrant scenes that synced along with Daniel Pemberton's amazing music makes for one of my top favorite movie experiences, EVER! BOY Oh Howdy! I almost listened to critics and didn't go see it. I would have regretted that! This movie is original in composition, style, orchestration, and especially MUSIC! Don't make the mistake of not seeing this in theaters. A lot will be lost watching it on a 15 inch laptop. Expand
5 of 13 users found this helpful58
All this user's reviews
10
RiotshieldMay 13, 2017
I hope we will become a second one. This Movie was great and a masterpiece. I can not accept the press ratings ignore them this is really irritating that they underrate every Fantasy Movie.
6 of 16 users found this helpful610
All this user's reviews
7
thehatcheteerMay 13, 2017
It's not Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels, but then again, it shouldn't be. Richie takes on a project much more like his Sherlock endeavor here, and I think his style is much more suited to medieval action than Victorian gum-shoeing.

If
It's not Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels, but then again, it shouldn't be. Richie takes on a project much more like his Sherlock endeavor here, and I think his style is much more suited to medieval action than Victorian gum-shoeing.

If you go into this movie with the right expectations (i.e. sword-swinging, fast-paced fun) you will almost certainly have a good time. If you want Oscar bait, you are going to be disappointed. I think that sums it up.
Expand
3 of 8 users found this helpful35
All this user's reviews
7
Rutger-KikkertMay 13, 2017
King Arthur: Legend Of The Sword is a pretty fun, enjoyable, throw-away movie with some good performances of Charlie Hunnam, Jude Law and most of the supporting cast (except for the lady who plays the mage). The movie suffers from some issuesKing Arthur: Legend Of The Sword is a pretty fun, enjoyable, throw-away movie with some good performances of Charlie Hunnam, Jude Law and most of the supporting cast (except for the lady who plays the mage). The movie suffers from some issues with storytelling. It has some of those typical Guy Ritchie sequences where the story is told on a unique and rapid way. But those sequences tell actually the most interesting and funny parts of the story, but they're glossed over like they aren't of any importance what's so ever. The movie would also be much better if it had a longer runtime, now it's a two hour long generic knights and fantasy movie with the name King Arthur wich makes it less generic. It could've been more if it had some more scenes where the supporting characters are more fleshed out (so we as audience could actually care more about them) and if it worked out those unique storytelling sequences more. Also it is clearly to see where the money went when it comes to CGI. Some sequences have beautifl CGI others look like something straight out of an animation movie from 2005. The same with the action: sometimes it's filmed and directed beautiful other times it's hard to see what's going on. But besides all those problems (wich by the way don't make the movie a bad watch) King Arthur: Legend Of The Sword is a good movie to watch with not too much expectations; a great movie for on tv on a friday night to watch with some familymembers or friends. I would even recommend seeing it in theaters or buy on blu-ray (not for the full price though). Expand
3 of 8 users found this helpful35
All this user's reviews
10
XanditzMay 17, 2017
The movie is awesome. First, lets just say it: It's not a classical view of the legend. But for real? Does anyone though it would be? Just check any trailer that you would know better. Ok, with this out of the way, the movie is a really coolThe movie is awesome. First, lets just say it: It's not a classical view of the legend. But for real? Does anyone though it would be? Just check any trailer that you would know better. Ok, with this out of the way, the movie is a really cool Action/Fantasy thriller. Great shots, awesome fights and and really fantasy stuff like magic and monsters. The story isn't anything different than Hollywood has been offering over the last decades; A classical path of the reluctant hero. The pace of the movie is really fast, and because of it some characters has not a proper developments, so you don't feel really attached to them when they die. But I'll repeat here: Is a ACTION movie. If you put a proper mind set you'll see the beauty of it. Expand
3 of 9 users found this helpful36
All this user's reviews
7
johnem95Jun 24, 2017
"King Arthur: Legend of the Sword" may not be the most faithful adaptation of the classic tale, but it's nonetheless an entertaining adventure with stylish action, good performances, and an awesome soundtrack.
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
7
silkLRMay 18, 2017
Très loin de ce que Guy Ritchie peut faire, c'est un film d'action avec de mauvaise images de synthèse. Les 30 minutes de snatch médiéval sauve le film...
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
10
Great_OnealJun 11, 2017
Based off critic reviews compared to audience scores across this site (41 vs. audience 78), imDb(7.3 from 41,000 users) and Rotten Tomatoes(28% critic score vs.75% audience) it is clear that critics didn't even give this movie a chance. It'sBased off critic reviews compared to audience scores across this site (41 vs. audience 78), imDb(7.3 from 41,000 users) and Rotten Tomatoes(28% critic score vs.75% audience) it is clear that critics didn't even give this movie a chance. It's pathetic these days where a quality film can be so over-looked and clearly widely panned by critics. But, it is not their opinions or prolific write-ups that matter. It's what we as regular movie-goers think and feel and that is clearly evident based off the above scores.

Now on to the movie. There wasn't a thing that I didn't like about it.(my second viewing clearing up any issue I took after the first viewing).

Guy Ritchie's visual style and film making talent are on full display here and even more so with the Fantasy setting to my utter enjoyment. And what I love is he pulls it off here whether it's the subtle details in the background that can easily be missed the first time through or the more often in-your-face awesomeness from the outstanding visuals, camera work(interesting overhead shots and angles), great performances and interesting characters and unique pulse-pounding score.

If you hate Guy Ritchie movies, you will most likely not enjoy this movie. His common stylistic flourishes and storytelling tropes are in full use here but to great effect.

This is a different approach to the King Arthur we have seen in movies past. Missing is a love interest between Guinevere(actually this character was altogether left out) and Arthur or Lancelot(who was also left out) which I happily enjoyed. Instead, in their place, is King Arthur's strong connection and camaraderie with his friends and the women who looked after him when he was growing up. It was a nice change compared to the many movies that feel a love interest is needed. Also Merlin exists but only mentioned and in his place as "his guide" is a female character known only as "Mage". Those are not the only differences, but I will spare the rest so as not to spoil them.

I already mentioned the cool visuals but also the action is well choreographed and shot. The epic opening scene alone will attest to both.

The characters, which there are many, have enough character development(strangely some critics mention too little character development which was baffling) and stand out as unique and interesting with one even holding a past grudge that plays out so well and in an entertaining way I won't spoil it. Bottom line is that you CARE about them. Something so rarely achieved in some of these big blockbuster summer movies or in general.

Charlie Hunnam's performance as King Arthur was so enjoyable to watch! His character evolves and develops as he struggles with the weight of who he is and what he must do. The Villain portrayed by Jude Law does an excellent job as a jealous and power hungry brother to the King. And we see him also struggle with what he will do to accomplish that power to a disturbing degree. The last thing I'll mention, because I could go on and on, is the outstanding soundtrack or musical score performed by Daniel Pemberton that truly stands out and is one of the best that I have heard in a long time( Incorporating actual breathing in a couple tracks). The score overall enhanced the mood and took to the the next level every scene it was used in. "This isn't your usual Hollywood epic adventure, it's a Guy Ritchie Hollywood epic adventure," explained Pemberton. "That means usual rules don't apply. In fact no rules apply. All that matters is can you make a score that sounds like nothing else? That was the mission."

This version of Guy Ritchie's Arthur is a truly enjoyable, engaging, awesome and entertaining experience. Isn't that why we go to the movies anyway? To be moved, inspired, scared or just plain entertained? I will say this about King Arthur: Legend of the Sword and all it's parts: Mission accomplished.
Expand
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
8
arcubalAug 24, 2017
I love the hectic, almost schizofrenic, shooting/editing style of Ritchie and if you don't, this one is not for you. Like Sherlock Holmes, the story is told through frantic pieces of action and exposition, shifting the action from (not just)I love the hectic, almost schizofrenic, shooting/editing style of Ritchie and if you don't, this one is not for you. Like Sherlock Holmes, the story is told through frantic pieces of action and exposition, shifting the action from (not just) plot events to the way the story is told. Amazing visuals make this (like Sherlock) a very interesting and engaging film to see. Way more original than the last few takes on the Arthurian legend. Expand
2 of 6 users found this helpful24
All this user's reviews
9
SibJul 10, 2017
Legends need to be reinvented, suit the times in which they are narrated. I'm surprised that most of the critics seem to fail to understand. I was really enchanted with Richie vision, the world seems believable, characters are cool and theLegends need to be reinvented, suit the times in which they are narrated. I'm surprised that most of the critics seem to fail to understand. I was really enchanted with Richie vision, the world seems believable, characters are cool and the dialogues are well written. Highly recommended. Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
10
DoubleTrippleNov 17, 2017
Movie is just insane ride from start to end. Its an action/fantasy popcorn movie, so thats what you are getting. If you are into that, it does not get much better. Personally, i think that the actors performances were amazing. It makes meMovie is just insane ride from start to end. Its an action/fantasy popcorn movie, so thats what you are getting. If you are into that, it does not get much better. Personally, i think that the actors performances were amazing. It makes me realy sad we most likely wont be getting any of the planned sequels, because movie flopped. If only they would make at least some smaller budget sequel. Probably most fun i had in cinema in 2017. Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
9
ConradoflightJun 30, 2017
Ritchie is not one of the great directors. But he got his own style where he excels and is more or less unmatched by anyone since he created this style. I would probably not have watched this but the overly negative critique made me take aRitchie is not one of the great directors. But he got his own style where he excels and is more or less unmatched by anyone since he created this style. I would probably not have watched this but the overly negative critique made me take a look. I don't regret that. Only thing I regret is that I didn't watch it on a huge screen with surround sound. Great pace, dialogue and performance all through. Technically this is a 10 movie. Missed some more story depth though so 9 will do. The soundtrack is married to this movie, such a great match. I will watch this again. Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
9
Kubasa_UndeadJul 2, 2017
This is outrages! I don't know what problems all these critics have because this movie is amazing. I have to admit it, I've had no expectations whatsoever going to see this movie but somehow it was so absorbing that I never during screeningThis is outrages! I don't know what problems all these critics have because this movie is amazing. I have to admit it, I've had no expectations whatsoever going to see this movie but somehow it was so absorbing that I never during screening looked at my phone. There was not a single second while I could be bored! You can say that I'm overreacting and that's probably true, but I just want to express how much this movie surprised me. Now let's cut to the case. The music is so good and works so well with what is happening on screen that I'm seriously amazed. The camera work is perfect for this type of film and even the CGI effects were really good. Overall, I generally liked that movie. I wasn't hoping for much but I receive a (and I'm not afraid to use that word) masterpiece. Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
7
AcclamationOct 2, 2017
It's a film for men in America, that have been trivialized by American culture. It's very inspiring for men, and there aren't many left in America, so this film will get mostly bad ratings. If you are a Man, then the beginning is slow andIt's a film for men in America, that have been trivialized by American culture. It's very inspiring for men, and there aren't many left in America, so this film will get mostly bad ratings. If you are a Man, then the beginning is slow and painful, but if you can accept the feminine, fantasy crap, like most of us can survive to have sex with the hot ones here, then you'll be ok.
It isn't a great film in any way, other than special effects, which seems to be the norm nowadays.
It's a film for the few, with the special effects to wow the idiots, with a message for the best of us. It's hard to find positive messages in Hollywood nowadays. I hope my review isn't a death sentence for the production crew or cast.
Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
10
ThaddeusDec 16, 2017
Critics need to get their brains checked, because this was such a well made movie. Had the best sword fight, music, and acting you will ever see. Guy Ritchie has a very unique style of directing, which I love. Too bad they will not make any sequels.
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
10
ThordinDec 25, 2017
It's a new take on the Arthur Legend, it's entertaining and a nice setup for future movies.
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
9
Terry006Jan 2, 2018
It’s exciting, unique and has exceptional quality. The scores is not good reflection of how it truly is and only the people who have never heard about the story of Arthur would be lost. Which almost everyone has so it was nice to see a movieIt’s exciting, unique and has exceptional quality. The scores is not good reflection of how it truly is and only the people who have never heard about the story of Arthur would be lost. Which almost everyone has so it was nice to see a movie that didn’t waste so much time on the tales which we already know. Richie is a great director and going from his usually style of films to this was more enjoyable that expected. Those who gave a poor review just lack imagination and decided the score before watching it because the film I saw was not below average. We have all seen average and that would be another typical movie where characters behave like we expect. This was something new and fresh from a well known story that has be depicted over and over. Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
7
FranbarrmanMar 15, 2018
Give this one a chance is really fun movie.charlie hunnam looks like he enjoyed every second he spends con this film and also i notice the hurt he puts todo his caracther.
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
9
MallshalayMay 13, 2017
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Okay, I must say I went in there with high expectations as you do when you want to see a new movie from a director that you know has never failed you and I was not dissapointed at all.

Great epic movie about one of the biggest myths ever that mixes serious scenes with fun elements that are typical for Guy Ritchie and ALL of it is filled with an awesome soundtrack music, especially that scene when Arthur (Charlie Hunman) is bitten by a magical snake a rides a horse back to Camelot, and I couldn't help myself but to enjoy it from start to end and for that I thank you, Guy.
Expand
4 of 13 users found this helpful49
All this user's reviews
10
KordunJun 23, 2017
In my opinion, I found this film very well. Magic world and a king that wont be a king at the beginning until he find his destiny. Dont understand the bad rating from the agencies.
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
7
Jess_HillJun 2, 2017
Medieval Lockstock is a grand spectacle that's actually a fun, if ridiculous, interpretation of the classic tale. Ritchie's distinctive style has been turned up to eleven, with the script and editing reflecting his love of the British workingMedieval Lockstock is a grand spectacle that's actually a fun, if ridiculous, interpretation of the classic tale. Ritchie's distinctive style has been turned up to eleven, with the script and editing reflecting his love of the British working class vernacular and super fast cuts that are only occasionally disorienting. The cinematography and creature design provide some exceptional moments, and the esoteric soundtrack gives this film a unique quality. The storyline covers a great deal, though with little depth, and the performances are solid, with plenty of excuses for Hunnam to take his shirt off. An entertaining, if not a cerebral, experience. 7.01/10 Expand
2 of 7 users found this helpful25
All this user's reviews
10
Aggie82May 19, 2017
Return of the King meets Matrix with Guy Ritchie smartass all over it! Loved it! I was laughing many times when no one else in the theater appeared to get it. Going to see it in theater again! Official "movie critics" never get it right!
3 of 11 users found this helpful38
All this user's reviews
8
StayloneMay 14, 2017
The only thing I could say is bad about this film - scenario and plot. Narrative is pretty bad too. But everything else is splendid. Graphics, nice fighting scenes, good and disclosed characters, decent soundtrack. Defienetly should beThe only thing I could say is bad about this film - scenario and plot. Narrative is pretty bad too. But everything else is splendid. Graphics, nice fighting scenes, good and disclosed characters, decent soundtrack. Defienetly should be watched, thanks rotten tomatoes and other "critics" for 41% Expand
3 of 12 users found this helpful39
All this user's reviews
9
kendrickdkMay 17, 2017
Loved It! I love how the dialog was carried out... felt like ocean's 11 meets Excalibur. The acting was top notch. Plot was pretty good. The most important thing was that it was fun.
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
9
rohail6May 16, 2017
Awesome movie! Cinematography is amazing, music that keeps you on the edge of your seat and and acting is great too. For comparison, it's better than GuardiansV2. Can't understand the hate from the critics. Charlie Hunnam's acting isAwesome movie! Cinematography is amazing, music that keeps you on the edge of your seat and and acting is great too. For comparison, it's better than GuardiansV2. Can't understand the hate from the critics. Charlie Hunnam's acting is fantastic too he's the perfect hero. And Guy Ritchie does this thing with some of the scenes where he tells the story before and during and its hard to describe but really cool while it's happening. Give it a chance and go see it! Expand
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
10
BloodyrusMay 21, 2017
Определенно, лучший фильм этой весны и определенно один из лучших фильмов Гая Ричи. Не любить этот фильм невозможно. Будем надеяться на продолжение, которое по идее ожидается.Определенно, лучший фильм этой весны и определенно один из лучших фильмов Гая Ричи. Не любить этот фильм невозможно. Будем надеяться на продолжение, которое по идее ожидается.
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
9
JuliagiaMay 15, 2017
I loved it. Guy Richie is one of the unique directors this days. Can't say it's his best work, but it's still pretty good. Too bad it had a bad start fees. Critics got paid by Disney for bad reviews :D
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
8
One_RifleMay 16, 2017
This film was weird, strange, and fantastic, full of Guy Ritchie-isms and style.The climax was absolutely ridiculous that left me wondering if people around me were seeing what I was seeing (in a good way). Absolutely love the Soundtrack fromThis film was weird, strange, and fantastic, full of Guy Ritchie-isms and style.The climax was absolutely ridiculous that left me wondering if people around me were seeing what I was seeing (in a good way). Absolutely love the Soundtrack from Daniel Pemberton just as good as the film. Would definitely recommend this. Expand
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
9
BuggeurMay 16, 2017
I was really hype for that movie since I saw the first trailer and I wasn't disappointed. Sure the movie is not perfect and the 10-15 first minutes are not the best way to introduce the story. But except than that the rythm was good, theI was really hype for that movie since I saw the first trailer and I wasn't disappointed. Sure the movie is not perfect and the 10-15 first minutes are not the best way to introduce the story. But except than that the rythm was good, the action and fight scenes were pretty intense and well realized, the actors do their part (no oscar winners but still we believe in the characters and that's really enough, also Charlie hunnam is pretty convincing as Arthur and Jude law as the villain), the music is great and well integrated to the scenes, and finally I loved the fact that they included the fantasy part. So please don't listen to the critics and give this movie a shot, you'll have a great time :). Expand
2 of 8 users found this helpful26
All this user's reviews
8
NasherMay 25, 2017
This is a FUN movie. I don't know what the "critics" are on about. The "classic" King Arthur tale has been done to death many times, this was something original. Go and see it.
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
9
RealMuthaFAug 11, 2017
Seriously, again? Again, Guy Ritchie makes an awesome movie with potential for sequels and an outstanding kick-ass soundtrack from Daniel Pemberton, and again it fails to get good critic reviews and solid box office performance?

If there are
Seriously, again? Again, Guy Ritchie makes an awesome movie with potential for sequels and an outstanding kick-ass soundtrack from Daniel Pemberton, and again it fails to get good critic reviews and solid box office performance?

If there are two most unfair box office performance patterns these days, those are Disney's frame-by-frame "live-action" (i.e. CGI) worthless remakes of their classic cartoons getting billions of dollars and Guy Ritchie's two last movies (this and the equally amazing U.N.C.L.E.) severely underperforming financially. Let's see the outcome when those two trends collide with Ritchie making an Aladdin movie.

In the meantime, don't listen to the so-called "critics" and watch The Legend of the Sword. It's a great, hugely entertaining action movie with solid performances from the main (Hunnam, Law) and the side characters alike. The pacing is impeccable, with the action not letting you go throughout the film. It's got some great, Ritchie trademark humor and dynamic editing, too. The CGI can look cheap, and that's probably my only complaint aside from a few minor ones. Oh, and did I mention the kick-ass soundtrack? I did, but again, it's so good I stayed through the credits just to listen to it, and immediately got myself the album after watching the movie.

Warner Bros., please, take some of that comic book money and let Ritchie make Arthur 2 or U.N.C.L.E. 2, the world will be a better place.
Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
10
xfxAug 15, 2017
Fun, entertainment action movie with nice story and excellent soundtrack. Seems like critics opinion, these days, worth nothing. You just have to go and see everything yourself, and make your own opinion, or other way, you will keep thinkingFun, entertainment action movie with nice story and excellent soundtrack. Seems like critics opinion, these days, worth nothing. You just have to go and see everything yourself, and make your own opinion, or other way, you will keep thinking that "...last good movies were made in 50th" and "...last good music were made in 60th".
11/10. Guy Ritchie Rocks
Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
9
lboddeMay 21, 2017
I don't know why all the hate on this movie. I thought it was great. I was pulled in and entertained for the length of it. Granted, if you are looking for the 'romantic' version of Camelot, this is not it. But it was contemporary, visual asI don't know why all the hate on this movie. I thought it was great. I was pulled in and entertained for the length of it. Granted, if you are looking for the 'romantic' version of Camelot, this is not it. But it was contemporary, visual as hell, and well acted. The details were impeccable. There were some off moments with editing/direction decisions and they pulled me out of the story a few times. So it's not a perfect movie but I'd spend my money to see it again and I don't say that often. Compared to the horror that was the 'Great Wall', this is practically movie nirvana. Jude Law was the perfect casting choice and he seems to be so under-rated. He's been a revelation lately (see The Young Pope). And Charlie Hunnam? Well, yeah. Sexy as hell and coming up the ranks in his acting ability since Sons of Anarchy. I hope the move forward with their plans to make this a series because I definitely want to see more. Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
9
ergenecondomAug 25, 2017
Bir efsaneyi efsaneleştirmişler film 10 numara sürükleyici ilgi çekici içine kapıyor sizi charlie hunnam role tam uymuş ihtişamlı bir film olmuş
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
9
blindmanchavezAug 5, 2017
If I only had one word to describe this movie, it would be - FUN! The visuals are insane, the music is on point and phenomenal, and the re-imagining of the tale of King Arthur is unique and makes for an interesting premise. It's almost moreIf I only had one word to describe this movie, it would be - FUN! The visuals are insane, the music is on point and phenomenal, and the re-imagining of the tale of King Arthur is unique and makes for an interesting premise. It's almost more of an original story more than it is a movie about King Arthur. The CGI gets a little over-done [like in The Matrix Series] in 2 or 3 action scenes, but it's not enough to change the fact that this is a FUN movie that I'm glad I watched. If your in the mood for some care-free action bliss with AMAZING visuals, this is the movie for you! P.S. The cast they were able to pull together for this movie is really astounding - people from Game of thrones, Marco Polo, Sons of Anarchy, Gladiator... The list goes on and on! Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
10
MrsMovieLoverAug 18, 2017
The Good: First things first, I absolutely loved the cast of this movie. Been a huge fan of Hunnam since Sons of Anarchy and in this movie, he did NOT disappoint. Loved the witty King Arthur, along with his fellow warriors. Secondly, theThe Good: First things first, I absolutely loved the cast of this movie. Been a huge fan of Hunnam since Sons of Anarchy and in this movie, he did NOT disappoint. Loved the witty King Arthur, along with his fellow warriors. Secondly, the movie's graphics, man... mind blowing! The fight scenes were EPIC! You'd almost feel like you're in a video game, at some point, the graphics is THAT awesome. What I loved about the plot is that nothing about the movie is dilly or dally, it's quick and to the point. The Bad: The movie was kinda overwhelming. IT was intense, it was quick, it didn't build up the excitement. It was like, BOOM and then CRAAAAASH! This might have frazzled the nerves of quite a few, I can say.
The Ugly: NONE. There's nothing ugly about this movie, not to me at least. Thoroughly enjoyed this movie, was a great watch and would take a top sit (Right beside 300) on my list of EPIC As F*** MOVIES.
Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
9
WeskerrrMay 13, 2017
I have to say I was skeptical before going to see this movie with all the negative reviews but since it's Guy Ritchie I decided to give it a try...Very good decision. This is my kind of action movie: fast paced and action packed, the scenesI have to say I was skeptical before going to see this movie with all the negative reviews but since it's Guy Ritchie I decided to give it a try...Very good decision. This is my kind of action movie: fast paced and action packed, the scenes are very well shot and sometimes even beautiful. The pace rarely slows down.

The critics giving this movie a bad score seem to be confused. Make no mistake this is an action movie and it delivers as an action movie. The story is not going to be amazing and the movie has it fair share of flaws: from the main actor trying a little too hard to be convincing with his British accent to some wtf scenes. Also, some scenes could have been way more developed.

Overall the movie is highly entertaining and captivating, you are pulled into the world of Camelot and I can't wait for the sequel. Highly recommend 9/10
Expand
2 of 10 users found this helpful28
All this user's reviews
9
AlexanderTurnerMay 22, 2017
Really very enjoyable and me for (being of the younger generation) a new take on the historical fantasy type genre. (I'm not a Guy Ritchie aficionado)

I thought the casting was excellent and the story definitely held me for the whole film.
Really very enjoyable and me for (being of the younger generation) a new take on the historical fantasy type genre. (I'm not a Guy Ritchie aficionado)

I thought the casting was excellent and the story definitely held me for the whole film.

Worth seeing.
Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
7
russiangamerMay 20, 2017
Хорошее кино.
Что понравилось: Визуальная часть получилась отличной, режиссёрские фишки Ричи работают и выглядят потрясно, хороший саундтрек.
Равнодушным оставил только сюжет, просто скучноватый он, но не настолько, чтобы заснуть прямо в
Хорошее кино.
Что понравилось: Визуальная часть получилась отличной, режиссёрские фишки Ричи работают и выглядят потрясно, хороший саундтрек.
Равнодушным оставил только сюжет, просто скучноватый он, но не настолько, чтобы заснуть прямо в кинотеатре, как это сделал мужик сзади меня.
Лично я сделал для себя такой вывод: если бы я не пошёл в кино, то, наверное, ничего важного для своего киноманского взора не упустил. Идите на ваше усмотрение, если нравятся фентези или Ричи.
Expand
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
9
ZiburinisJun 23, 2017
Strange average score from critics... For it's genre it's superb movie! It is fast paced, no dumb romance involved and sometimes you really feel that it is Guy Ritchie's movie.
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
9
AdamJohnson80May 14, 2017
I was looking forward to this movie since I heard about it last year. I really enjoyed the movie and hope they are able to make the planned sequels. I was entertained throughout the movie because it had plenty action and more laughs than II was looking forward to this movie since I heard about it last year. I really enjoyed the movie and hope they are able to make the planned sequels. I was entertained throughout the movie because it had plenty action and more laughs than I anticipated. I recommend this movie if you're looking to be entertained. Expand
1 of 8 users found this helpful17
All this user's reviews
8
JerryPetrolAug 20, 2017
I absolutely loved the movie. After we saw it in the theater, we wanted to watch it again. Guy Ritchie is awesome and this is one of his best movies. Charlie Hunnam is also fantastic. I hope they make a sequel. If you like movies with lots ofI absolutely loved the movie. After we saw it in the theater, we wanted to watch it again. Guy Ritchie is awesome and this is one of his best movies. Charlie Hunnam is also fantastic. I hope they make a sequel. If you like movies with lots of action and a fun group of characters, this is worth giving a rent, or even buying. I got it on Xbox Movies the day it came out. Also, the soundtrack is pretty sick! Expand
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
10
RidiculousDeathOct 11, 2019
An original spin on a legend, and a great movie. One negative is that a story moves too fast.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
10
masterwishxJan 29, 2020
Very Interesting movie , one of the best Guy Ritchie film.
Top Video graphics, video effects,top music and sound.
Must be watched
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
Happy-KMay 26, 2019
Its Fun. I honestly don't have much more to say. Its isn't perfect because the story isn't special and some of the Characters are one dimensional even if the Actors show an good performance. But Guy Ritchies fast style makes the MovieIts Fun. I honestly don't have much more to say. Its isn't perfect because the story isn't special and some of the Characters are one dimensional even if the Actors show an good performance. But Guy Ritchies fast style makes the Movie entertaining and re watchable.The action is great the CGI is fantastic and Charlie Hunnam is an great Arthur. Its sad that we never gonna see an 2 Movie. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
FC_AC-playOct 4, 2019
Great music, scenario and effects. Watched this movie five times! Do not consider critic’s reviews seriously
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
ElenaroMar 11, 2020
Он офигенен. Не имеет ничего общего с легендой про Артура, но как самостоятельный фильм смотрится очень хорошо. Хотя "боевая мега форма" злодея просто ужасно нелепая.Он офигенен. Не имеет ничего общего с легендой про Артура, но как самостоятельный фильм смотрится очень хорошо. Хотя "боевая мега форма" злодея просто ужасно нелепая.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
Joe8827Apr 22, 2020
This movie is fun as hell and an awesome take on a boring story otherwise. Watch it
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
NotoriousFraudMay 16, 2017
Guy Ritchie is still in top form for "King Arthur: Legend of the Sword". Charlie Hunnam channels both inner strength and charisma as Arthur Pendragon, which he knocks out of the park. There really was not a lot i didnt like about this movie,Guy Ritchie is still in top form for "King Arthur: Legend of the Sword". Charlie Hunnam channels both inner strength and charisma as Arthur Pendragon, which he knocks out of the park. There really was not a lot i didnt like about this movie, with the scathing "critic" reviews and horrid box office you would think this would be one of the worst movies ever. Well if you thought that then be ready for a surprise. With a rich lore filled story packed with some of the best special effects i've seen in big blockbusters, "King Arthur" is by far the best movie about Arthurian legend. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
DaggerrimFeb 4, 2021
Amazing, epic, funny and unique. These are all the things that make the movie work. Don't listen to the critics and watch it for yourself. I don't think it's for everyone but if you love fantasy you will find this to be a wild and exciting ride.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
AWESOM-0Jul 1, 2020
I’m a huge fan of Arthurian tales and I usually don’t like drastic changes but this movie was entertaining and Guy Richie’s unique style worked for the most part. There was a flat and repetitive vibe about half way thru but overall it wasI’m a huge fan of Arthurian tales and I usually don’t like drastic changes but this movie was entertaining and Guy Richie’s unique style worked for the most part. There was a flat and repetitive vibe about half way thru but overall it was still good. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
MxClassicGameAug 13, 2022
well i think it was a good Movie , the ending is kinda goofy tho but i liked it
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
ChandracadabraJan 14, 2021
Cool movie.. I thought some of the blonde haired supposed to be king role could of been a lil bit toned down and a lil bit more mature. Just a little
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
sujay65May 1, 2021
Thoroughly enjoyable movie if you like this genre. Special effects are well done and cast is good.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews