Jumper

Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation | Release Date: February 14, 2008

7.5	USER SCORE Generally favorable reviews based on 645 Ratings

USER RATING DISTRIBUTION

Watch Now

Stream On

Buy on

Stream On

Expand

Review this movie

VOTE NOW

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Please sign in or create an account before writing a review.

Check box if your review contains spoilers

0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User score By date Most helpful

Compi24Nov 28, 2012

Poor acting and a lackluster story completely submerge the film's somewhat intriguing premise in a mire of forgettability .

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

JekSpaceyMay 3, 2014

After seeing "In time" I said "brilliant idea, but it could be done better," but as far as the basic idea of "In Time" had been crapped with the usual cliches film, the film is not a product poor, indeed it is worth to see it at least once inAfter seeing "In time" I said "brilliant idea, but it could be done better," but as far as the basic idea of "In Time" had been crapped with the usual cliches film, the film is not a product poor, indeed it is worth to see it at least once in their life because as in "The truman show" the whole movie is a great metaphor for real life!
For Jumper I thought the same thing, but with a small big difference, is the whole movie to be poor! Aside from a few funny sequence say, this film is really bad! The basic idea could not have been handled worse than that!
I did not like anything about this movie, the actors are bad (samuel jackson is not served to bring up the level), the direction is bad, the picture is horrible, and the assembly sickening! In conclusion, a film to be avoided… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

JalumbiApr 27, 2015

''Jumper'' sets a very interesting premise and gives interest to public with its somewhat original story, but all this is spoiled by its extremely tiny script and cheesy acting by all of its cast (unfortunately, Samuel L. Jackson too).

1 of 11 users found this helpful110

All this user's reviews

zNeverSleepingSep 25, 2020

Eu lembro de assistir esse filme quando criança, e é obvio que eu achava o máximo. Conceito no minimo intrigante, com um elenco bonitinho e um ou outro famoso. Isso já era o suficiente para me divertir. Mas hoje, tendo uma visão completamenteEu lembro de assistir esse filme quando criança, e é obvio que eu achava o máximo. Conceito no minimo intrigante, com um elenco bonitinho e um ou outro famoso. Isso já era o suficiente para me divertir. Mas hoje, tendo uma visão completamente diferente de cinema como arte, o que acho desse longa?

Desde o principio, eu já sabia que se tratava de um blockbuster, então mesmo gostando bastante da obra, minhas expectativas não era altas. Mas isso não significa que o filme tem de ser vazio e ruim em tudo que faz, né?!

A premissa do filme é muito convidativa, pois lida com uma "habilidade" que qualquer pessoa iria querer, mas o desenvolvimento a partir disso é muito ruim. Primeiro temos os personagens, que se agarram a arquétipos e se esforçam muito para não sair deles. O roteiro insiste em chicles e não para um segundo para desenvolver nem se quer o protagonista, não de forma efetiva. É como se os roteiristas tivessem medo de quitarmos durante o filme, por isso ele tenta forçar um clima onde sempre está acontecendo na tela, enquanto o background da trama é jogado no lixo. Temos diversas perguntas em mente, 95% delas não são respondidas e o filme não tem medo de fazer um furo atrás do outro, com contradições até mesmo no código de moral do antagonista. A personagem feminina é uma das mais mal escritas que tive o desprazer de acompanhar. O roteiro usa dela na cara dura pra motivar atitudes burras por parte do protagonista. O pior é que tudo que tudo que acontece no filme vem a partir de conveniências e condutas incompreensíveis, desde o assalto no banco a "saltar" em público, pra qualquer um ver. Tá me dizendo mesmo que o protagonista nunca se questionou sobre outros Jumpers ou "puts, acho melhor não fazer isso em publico"?

As cenas de ação eram muito boas - na minha imaginação, mas só nela mesmo. A câmera é tremida e a cinematografia é confusa. É muito difícil entender o que está acontecendo quando tudo que você pode ver são planos fechados e atores fazendo expressões de raiva, surpresa e dançando. A falta de conteúdo no filme é tamanha que chega um momento que é necessário exibicionismo gratuito [na cena do carro teleportando no meio da cidade] só para satisfazer o desejo de espectadores burros - é assim que os roteiristas nos enxergam.

Enfim, como conclusão, acho que a melhor coisa a se fazer é deixar uns filmes no passado mesmo.

Audio: English, with Portuguese subtitles. Q60T 50' TV Speakers [DTS 5.1]
Quality: 1080p SDR [Bluray]… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

AdamM.Mar 30, 2008

Completely awful... treats it's viewers as if they would enjoy the special effects enough to where nothing else would matter. Characters do things no person would, say things no person would say, things happen that never would, and even Completely awful... treats it's viewers as if they would enjoy the special effects enough to where nothing else would matter. Characters do things no person would, say things no person would say, things happen that never would, and even if they asked you to sustain disbelief, there is nothing worth watching. I went into this movie expecting something bad, as I had heard it was, and they STILL managed to disappoint. Everyone would let this movie be made should be fired, and the screenplay writer should be SHOT. No kidding, it really is that bad.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

DanielVladuFeb 23, 2008

this movie had no plot, terrible acting, incredibly boring dialogue, and just cruddy cinematography. However, I give it a one because of Samuel L. Jackson's "This shit I don't need" look in the end.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

LevS.Jul 14, 2008

I've watched it. I cannot unwatch it. What a shame. I wonder if Liman got the job by saying, "The locations are all over the world. I've filmed all over the world (Bourne Identity). Give me the gig." What a hack.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

PaulS.Jul 4, 2008

The concept was good. Unfortunately, that's the only good thing going for it.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

O.MMar 2, 2008

I went into it knowing that it wouldn't be 'just like the book', but I expected it to hold onto the same general story line for at least 2 minutes before turning into something that felt completely disconnected, and unrelated I went into it knowing that it wouldn't be 'just like the book', but I expected it to hold onto the same general story line for at least 2 minutes before turning into something that felt completely disconnected, and unrelated even to itself. Yes, the jump fights were kind of cool, but it didn't make up for the fact that it barely managed to grab my attention before losing it in a major way. It had great potential, but didn't even make it out of the gates.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

JohnS.Feb 15, 2008

This movie was terrible. It sucks a lot. I give it a 1. It should go have sex with itself.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

TheQuietGamerFeb 19, 2011

Jumper is by far one of the worst movies i've ever seen, the story is crap, and the characters are unlikable (but what did you expect when the main character is the guy who ruined Star Wars), it's ultimately a really unenjoyable movie.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

JermsNov 22, 2013

After seeing this dreadful version of the so called jumper movie I was appalled. The original book was a well written and interesting read that should never have been ruined by such a terrible rewrite. This is a prime example of moviesAfter seeing this dreadful version of the so called jumper movie I was appalled. The original book was a well written and interesting read that should never have been ruined by such a terrible rewrite. This is a prime example of movies ruining perfectly good story lines that have been laid out before them by excellent books. If only the movie producers could get their heads out of their buts and realize that people go to see movies that were originally books in hope that they are going to see the story that they know and love brought to life, not botched and ruined. No one goes to see films based on books in hopes that the movie is a far cry from the original story, nobody.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

JustinS.Mar 30, 2008

Anyone who rated this movie higher than a 5 is a fricken idiot. You are the kind of people who allow big budget, special effects dependent movies that have no good acting or plot continue to be made. I sincerely would like to gang beat the Anyone who rated this movie higher than a 5 is a fricken idiot. You are the kind of people who allow big budget, special effects dependent movies that have no good acting or plot continue to be made. I sincerely would like to gang beat the people who thought it deserved awards. The special effects were cool, sure, but without a back story, without any good writing, it is pure trash. It saddened me to read the reviews of a couple people who could actually speak intelligently, yet posted a review of a 10 for this garbage. So you mean to tell me this is as good as all the best movies out there??? Keep giving hollywood your money people, and agree with them that americans are dumb sheep and only need "shiny things" in front of our eyes to be entertained.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

IanCFeb 15, 2008

Awful awful awful awful. I WAS completely awestruck by Jumper, at how on earth this kind of junk gets made any more. The special-effects-only era is over, isn't it? We're in the dawn of a new era of a return to plot, character Awful awful awful awful. I WAS completely awestruck by Jumper, at how on earth this kind of junk gets made any more. The special-effects-only era is over, isn't it? We're in the dawn of a new era of a return to plot, character development, story as a basic requirement, aren't we? Hayden C has got to be one of the least charismatic actors around, he doesn't even LOOK the part. it's like he can't be bothered to even try acting half the time. This crud isn't worth the substance you excrete to coat your eyeballs so they don't dry out as you stare at this unbelievable heap of dreadfulness. As for the comments Oscars, irony surely? Hopefully? PLEASE?… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

TheSwamiFeb 19, 2008

This movie was horrible. Nothing was explained in the background to the two sides...Rachel Bilson magically just ignored the guy being gone for years and fell in love with the older version with no background in seconds...no idea why the This movie was horrible. Nothing was explained in the background to the two sides...Rachel Bilson magically just ignored the guy being gone for years and fell in love with the older version with no background in seconds...no idea why the other Jumper Griffin was so antagonistic to meeting/working with one of his kind...overall an abomination. I want my money back.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

MurrayMar 1, 2008

What a snoozer! Never before did I think I could fall asleep in a movie, but this one was just terrible! The effects, I must concede, were good, but it really didn't help the atrocious plot. Nothing was explained. How did he get the What a snoozer! Never before did I think I could fall asleep in a movie, but this one was just terrible! The effects, I must concede, were good, but it really didn't help the atrocious plot. Nothing was explained. How did he get the powers? Like, did they just appear? It made zero sense. Stay away… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful

BobFMar 9, 2008

Predictable movie and confirmation that Hayden Christianson cannot act. Don't waste your time. I hate to see the category of sci-fi associated with crap like this.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

TommyF.May 6, 2008

Damn! Who would want to watch this movie?

0 of 0 users found this helpful

HaydenCFeb 20, 2008

Worst movie I've seen in years. No dialogue or set story line. Every person involved with this film seemed to just "go through the motions." Not even fun to watch.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

DarinC.Feb 28, 2008

Never saw it, but gave it a 0 to counter James B's 10

0 of 0 users found this helpful

ZekeB.Jun 11, 2008

90 minutes of my life i will never get back.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

MauricioL.Jun 28, 2008

This movie was horrible and I really hated it, it had a lot of wholes and the acting waws bad , I thought it was a waste of time and i really like si fi flicks.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

DearGod...Jul 11, 2008

I really wish I could have "jumped" out of the theater. It was terrible. I could make better movies in my sleep.

0 of 0 users found this helpful

BroyaxJan 18, 2017

Handicap lourd au démarrage, Jumper est réalisé par ce crevard de Doug Liman, ce crétin qui surdécoupe chaque scène d'action en très petites lamelles d'un tiers de seconde comme dans une réclame publicitaire pour ados : mal de crâne assuré.Handicap lourd au démarrage, Jumper est réalisé par ce crevard de Doug Liman, ce crétin qui surdécoupe chaque scène d'action en très petites lamelles d'un tiers de seconde comme dans une réclame publicitaire pour ados : mal de crâne assuré. Autre souci très sévère également : la présence permanente d'Hayden Christensen, le branlo de la prélogie Starre Warzes, jeune acteur complètement naze qui devrait se limiter aux pubs pour gel coiffant.

On ne sait pas trop ce que vient faire Samuel L. Jackson dans cette galère mais un vieux, faut que ça mange. Les cheveux teints en blanc pour faire bien méchant, il joue par conséquent un méchaaant empêcheur de se téléporter en rond. Et ce n'est pas tout : une petite pétasse fait la petite amie du branquignole, une brune aussi écervelée qu'une blonde avec la vulgarité en plus (cadeau bonus).

Comme si cela ne suffisait pas, le scénario gribouillé sur les restes d'un rouleau de pet-cul a raison un peu trop vite de notre patience et tolérance à la stupidité galopante de cette imbécillité qui cumule à la fois le grotesque et le ridicule.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

prev next

Page: