Gramercy Pictures (I) | Release Date: October 18, 1996
7.3
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 21 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
15
Mixed:
1
Negative:
5
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
10
TrevorP.Jan 3, 2010
Incredible experience. Great acting, great cinematography, greta score.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
josecJan 8, 2010
Not true to the novel, epsecially the proto-feminist lunacy of Winslets character. Ridiculous screenplay, poorly directed and woodenly acted.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
RaveendraB.Jun 25, 2010
The director doesn't do justice to Thomas Hardy. What was the need for showing all that nude scenes? The novel is unforgettable for its pathos. I pity the director who could not grasp the novel.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
DawdlingPoetJan 6, 2022
A bleak and sobering watch, this film has good central performances from Christopher Eccleston and Kate Winslet. Its an average watch overall I'd say - a bit of a slow burn, plot wise, at the start - its an alright watch, though its not aA bleak and sobering watch, this film has good central performances from Christopher Eccleston and Kate Winslet. Its an average watch overall I'd say - a bit of a slow burn, plot wise, at the start - its an alright watch, though its not a film I'd actively recommend, unless your particularly keen on the main stars already mentioned. Also, I should perhaps point out that this film features a rather explicit (understandably very bloody) scene when Kate's character, Sue, gives bith. There is definitely a taboo element to the story but I wouldn't say its an out and out thrilling watch. It's an ok film though. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Stagger74Jul 13, 2021
********************************************************
》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》》
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews