Joker

7

DubeauNov 10, 2019

Joker is for the most part a psychology movie. This is still an origin movie but with focus on Arthur descent into insanity. And in a sens, his fate seems linked to the city itself. There is no fx here. The action is minimal and there areJoker is for the most part a psychology movie. This is still an origin movie but with focus on Arthur descent into insanity. And in a sens, his fate seems linked to the city itself. There is no fx here. The action is minimal and there are some violent moments. The performance of Phoenix is amazing (Oscar's worthy). And it has a good cast around him. The music is interesting and sound like some parts of The Dark Knight. Some areas of the movie are a bit slow. I personally didn't like the constant smoking. I give it 75%. Really good acting and interesting story.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

WalterJohsnonOct 20, 2019

A good movie that I'll definitely see again, but I felt that this was less a Movie about the DC Super Villain Joker, and more a movie about a Man's descent into madness, and they just threw in a bunch of Batman references to help market theA good movie that I'll definitely see again, but I felt that this was less a Movie about the DC Super Villain Joker, and more a movie about a Man's descent into madness, and they just threw in a bunch of Batman references to help market the movie better.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

7

antoniosousa83Oct 15, 2019

Bem o filme vale pela interpretacao de Joaquin Phoenix, no entanto, o filme acaba por ser demasiado nihilista, para uma personagem que nao necessitava de um filme de origem. Nao acho que seja a obra-prima que falam, mas a composicao e entregaBem o filme vale pela interpretacao de Joaquin Phoenix, no entanto, o filme acaba por ser demasiado nihilista, para uma personagem que nao necessitava de um filme de origem. Nao acho que seja a obra-prima que falam, mas a composicao e entrega do actor acaba por merecer todo o destaque, ofuscando as fragilidades do material.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

DiogaOct 4, 2019

Three words: American Psycho 3 If you watch the movie you know what I mean.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Honest-YanOct 10, 2019

Good acting and entertained me for the duration of the film. Not as thought provoking or deep as critics lead me to believe. Good film but not one I would watch again.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

BerikOct 11, 2019

Joker, based on the DC villian, is a drama movie about Arthur Fleck who through a life of hardship becomes the calamity that is called Joker. It is dark, it is brutal and it is a good movie.

Arthur Fleck was dealt the worst hand imaginableJoker, based on the DC villian, is a drama movie about Arthur Fleck who through a life of hardship becomes the calamity that is called Joker. It is dark, it is brutal and it is a good movie.

Arthur Fleck was dealt the worst hand imaginable when he was born. He was adopted by a delusional, mentally ill woman that had an abusive boyfriend. Other than that, she stood by as this man beat and abused her adopted son... You feel that? That depression? Well now imagine if that kid grows up, becomes a clown while having mental problems, and the city is going through a recess of sorts that cuts the funding of his social worker that prescribes his anti-depressive medication! We meet Arthur when he's already at the edge of falling down, but when he stops receiving his medication and accepts his own emotions towards society's standards, he finally finds himself. And with him Gotham city takes justice in its own hands, becoming sodom and gomorra. What is great, is how we see a very different perspective of Thomas Wayne and the elite class then we are used to from the Batman movies. It is refreshing.

It was an enjoyable watch, with a good performance by Joaquin Phoenix. I give it a 7/10. Though this version of the Joker is interesting, i can't help but feel that Heath ledger's version was more impactfull.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

LordFarquadDec 9, 2019

The film didn’t seem particularly cool to me, it is very overrated, in principle, you can watch it. A good game of the Phoenix, the plot will come off, filmed and mounted is also good. The film conveys the gloomy atmosphere well. This filmThe film didn’t seem particularly cool to me, it is very overrated, in principle, you can watch it. A good game of the Phoenix, the plot will come off, filmed and mounted is also good. The film conveys the gloomy atmosphere well. This film shows the current society well. The Joker is a film that suggests thinking.… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

7

UniversalReviewOct 5, 2019

2019's "Joker" is honestly a bit of an enigma, with controversy on one side, acclaim on the other, and a debate as to the film's true messages and quality raging all the while. So as someone who went in with next to no expectations, only a2019's "Joker" is honestly a bit of an enigma, with controversy on one side, acclaim on the other, and a debate as to the film's true messages and quality raging all the while. So as someone who went in with next to no expectations, only a rudimentary knowledge of the background discussion, and a healthy distrust of many of DC's more recent film offerings, what did I think?

I think "Joker" is most-definitely a good film, but not a great one, all down to one fatal flaw. It unfortunately never stops leaping for that mystical "higher bar", the legendary status enjoyed by films like The Dark Knight, and in that eagerness overreaches and kills its true potential. At its most sincere, "Joker" succeeds in being a convincingly fiery crucible to forge such a legendary villain, but especially in the beginning, turns up the heat even more to the point of self-parody.

When we're first dropped onto the dismal-yet-familiar streets of Gotham, the film wastes no time in setting the world against Phoenix's Arthur Fleck, and that over-eagerness was my core issue. There's no buildup, no hope, no sense of potential wasted: Without any world-building or context, Fleck existing just to get beaten down and beaten down is shockingly ineffective, proving the film's priorities are focused on the goal, rather than the beginning. Gangs of bullies and ruthless bosses feel more forced than villainous, transparent mechanisms that exist solely to get the character where he needs to be, rather than to provide the organic descent and societal backdrop we were promised. It feels shallow, and in essence, the film would've benefited from taking its foot of the accelerator for a moment and smelling the roses, because as it stands, "Joker" starts off doing 90 mph in a fifty, and hits you with all the subtlety and depth of a freight train.

However, once the wheels are in motion and Fleck's descent begins, director Todd Phillips and Phoenix are more able to run wild, and this is where the film truly shines. After a shaky opening, the ensuing roller-coaster ride is truly a sight to behold. And why wouldn't it be? Hasn't the Joker always been more effective in the present, did Heath Ledger need a backstory to succeed? No! As we watch both Gotham and Fleck unravel, every revelation and every depraved act comes as a gut-punch, all building up to a live finale that perfectly fits the tone of the film while feeling authentically Joker, and an ending that wisely avoids the expected cliches and ends on a note of glee. Here, the Joker becomes a twisted hero in his own way. It wasn't the success Arthur Fleck had hoped for, but it feels like destiny nonetheless, and by the end all force and stiffness from the start of "Joker's" world fades away into a feeling of chilling plausibility.

So to conclude, I would recommend "Joker" for anyone looking for a fresh take on the classic character. This isn't your typical superhero flick, and while the darkness and violence may be a turn-off for some, it's an experience most will enjoy. It's a film that starts off unconvincingly, but is sure to leave an impact by the end. And with such large clown-shoes to fill, "Joker" more or less reaches the bar.… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

7

ArtilleryJayOct 6, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Joker came out this weekend with mixed reviews, viewers seemed to (mostly) really enjoy it, while critics reviewed it poorly. I watched it Sunday night, and the theater was mostly empty. I for the most part enjoyed the film myself; with a huge exception. The characterization of the Joker was far from what I expected. Allow me to explain, and please, stick with me until the end. This article will contain some plot point spoilers, so be forewarned! If you have not yet seen the film (and I think that you should), please click away now and watch it first!
I’ll start with what I loved about Phoenix's Joker. His insanity was explained in a way that is believable, his delusions and his ‘condition’ help to shape and mold the character. That being said, I am a firm believer in never explaining the monster, when you do that it becomes less frightening. The way that the film explained it though (since it is an origin story).
The big issue that I took with the characterization is this: The Joker (eventually) will have battles of wits with The Batman, who is, for all intents and purposes, the greatest detective alive. Keeping this in mind, it is imperative that The Joker be equally as intelligent as, if not more than, Bruce Wayne. That is not The Joker that we meet in this film! It is as if the writers placed all the points into luck and none into intelligence! They painted the character as a bumbling fool, he never outsmarted the police, he never tricked the mayor, he just stumbled into a way out of each situation until the end of the film.
It feels like the writers did not understand the source material, or if they understood it, they simply did not care about it. There was no future proofing it. If they created in this Joker an idiot, there is no way that they can have that same Joker face Batman down the road. Like I said, I did enjoy the film mostly, I just took issue with the intelligence of (or lack of) the character.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

MarkHReviewsOct 12, 2019

“Joker” is a lot like the musical “Wicked.” Both offer backstories for iconic characters. “Wicked” retells “The Wizard of Oz”; “Joker” explains the genesis of Batman’s arch-nemesis. “Joker,” however, is “Wicked” without the upbeat music,“Joker” is a lot like the musical “Wicked.” Both offer backstories for iconic characters. “Wicked” retells “The Wizard of Oz”; “Joker” explains the genesis of Batman’s arch-nemesis. “Joker,” however, is “Wicked” without the upbeat music, the dancing, the redemptive friendships of key characters or songs with original, cleverly observational lyrics.

What makes this film worth watching is Joaquin Phoenix, once again fully immersed in a troubled character. When Phoenix steps into the role of Joker, his devotion to the role is absolute, his commitment is complete. His presence is so commanding that the moviegoer simply can’t look away. With the exception of Christopher Nolan’s Dark Knight series, “Joker” soars high above the other films that have addressed this comic book series. Some will even see elements of Scorsese’s “Taxi Driver” at various points. Director Phillips clearly aspires to offer much more than most of the films in this franchise. Because of Phoenix, he succeeds. The fatal flaw for “Joker” is that it is a one-note tune. In the vision of Writer/Director Todd Phillips, life is tedium interspersed with cruelty and violence, some of it random, some intentional. With one small exception, any sense of kindness or human connection is just a hallucination. In other words, apparently, it’s 42nd Street in New York City in the 1970s.

Against this barren landscape, Phillips engages in a little social commentary – the impact of the disintegrating mental health safety net, the grinding consequences for most when they are caught in the ever-widening gap between rich and poor. Clearly, these are topics with current relevance, but the subjects receive only glancing blows, not deep consideration.

What’s more frustrating, though, is that the script assumes that offering a chronology of events about Joker eliminates any obligation to engage in actual character development. We are given information about Joker’s tragic childhood, we observe him in his occupation as a low-level clown (in case we don’t get the point, the song “Send in the Clowns” is deployed to underline the idea), we see the consequences of his complete social isolation. But, critically, we never see Joker evolve in any way. He is no more self-aware than when the film begins. He’s just a tragic character lurching from one day to the next, moving closer and closer to a boiling point, heading toward a conclusion as obvious as it is unfortunate.

“Joker” is depressing, frustrating, upsetting, powerful and riveting. You can’t take your eyes off Joaquin Phoenix and the spectacle he ultimately creates. Sometimes, you may wish you had.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

chinesebeanNov 5, 2019

The Joker is great in almost everything - the acting, the colors, the visuals, the dialogue, the makeup - but like the main character, it's completely empty inside. Like Arthur, who sits in a dark room and fantasises about a better life,The Joker is great in almost everything - the acting, the colors, the visuals, the dialogue, the makeup - but like the main character, it's completely empty inside. Like Arthur, who sits in a dark room and fantasises about a better life, Phillips's Joker wants so badly to be something more than a superhero (or supervillain?) movie.
It tries to be a critique to modern society, but fails at being realistic.
It tries to be an elegy to nihilism, but its protagonist is more of a common criminal than an Übermensch.
It tries to be complex, but its black and white perspective makes it something you would expect in fanfiction. There is nothing new in Arthur's descent into madness and more importantly there is no real conflict. The viewer knows from the start what will happen, he knows that Arthur is supposed to be the victim who finally snaps and gets revenge on the real bad guys (namely everyone else). This movie feels like a "gut punch" to some people because of its emotional intensity - but is this feeling genuine? Or is there something more to it? The writers tried to make Arthur Fleck as real as possible, to make him a tragic character, but in the end it looks like they googled "Buttmonkey" and built him around that concept.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

hello_worldOct 24, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The Joker is an entertaining movie and its depiction of the titular character was compelling from begging to end. Joaquin Phoenix's performance was outstanding and will be remembered as on of the better Joker performances. Unfortunately, the movie falls flat when it comes to its themes and what it wants to say.

It seems like it wants us to be on the side of the working class. After all, the joker is a working class man who's issues are exacerbated by the upperclass. The government cut funding to mental health services, leaving him without his therapist and medication. Thomas Wayne seems uncaring and critical of the poor and even his celebrity hero made jokes at his expense. Following the Joker's actions, you can see how the class divide came to a head with the working class finally having enough of the oppression of the upper class and want social change.

However, this falls apart when you consider the actions of the Joker and rioters. The Joker, while more sympathetic in this iteration, is still a psychopathic killer and he is propped up as the hero of the working class. The working class started rioting and one even murders the Waynes in the alley as a form of revenge on the upper class. If the film wants us to take the side of the working class as the ones being taken advantage of, it failed. The upperclass were **** but the working class are dangerous criminals. This isn't helped by the fact that the movie showed the murder of the Waynes. We all know what will become of young Bruce. He becomes the hero of Gotham. He is also the top 1% Billionaire playboy. So eventually the hero of Gotham will be a rich man saving Gotham from people like his parent's murderer, who happens to be a poor and angry at the rich.

Even if the movie wanted to try to take a 'both sides' argument, it fails because the actions of the working class were way worse than the actions of the upperclass. The upperclass are the ones getting murdered in the streets. The working class are the ones idolising a killer clown. It seems very one sided.… Expand

8 of 9 users found this helpful81

All this user's reviews

7

RentawilOct 11, 2019

It took just a few inferences that "Joker" is a prequel to the earliest Batman comics and movies, let alone only the Batman character. As opposed to typical fluff and cartoonish action scenes, however, this film doesn't horse around withIt took just a few inferences that "Joker" is a prequel to the earliest Batman comics and movies, let alone only the Batman character. As opposed to typical fluff and cartoonish action scenes, however, this film doesn't horse around with pale expectations from the supervillain-following crowd. "Joker" takes itself entirely seriously and unapologetic in it's many-faceted presentation of the main character, played by former renegade actor Joachin Phoenix, with the apparent attempt to dissect this guy's psyche' within the framework of a totally serious explanation of humour vs. tragedy and evil vs. good. To the surprise of few, these analytics go only so far, leaving the audience to stitch the elements together for themselves.

The effort was noble, successful in a limited sort of way given how hampered this film is by some rather intrusive flaws. First and foremost to my eye -- or more precisely, to my ear -- is miscasting Phoenix as a clown who doesn't quite get the clown-laugh down convincingly; then again, perhaps this was an intentional faux pas (either by Direction or good Acting) in conveying Arthur Fleck's (Joker's) strain and frustration in playing the part of a professional funny man, when his personal life is in ruins. Personally, I found the rendition more ear-hurting and off-color than convincing, but who can say ?

The other quite noticeable bug-a-boo in this deeply disturbing tale is how, once in a while, random elements of older films are deliberately inserted into the action, not so much to enhance the story line but to throw in talking points among viewers. The most recognizable was the choice of Robert Di Niro as TV variety show host Murray Franklin in, for those who can recall, a blatant re-seating of the same star as wannabe show host Rupert Pupkin in 1982's black comedy "The King of Comedy", easily a better and more engaging flick. Tho it may be a facsimile of "Joker"'s intent to date it relative to its setting and scenes' demands, Franklin's jokes and one-liners were awfully lite and minimally funny -- once again a probable counter-play to Fleck's ironic humorous twists, given that he is by this point in the picture revealed as a murderer.

Another example of surreal connection to an earlier cinematic work was when rioting clowns protesting the mayoral campaign of Tom Wayne -- that's right, the father of future crime-fighter Batman -- began chanting something along the lines of "We're mad as hell and won't take it anymore !!" a la 1975's landmark movie "Network" starring Peter Finch and Faye Dunaway. Perhaps this critic is too dense to pick up on some deep significance of this "borrowed" mass quotation, yet all I know is its use was so distracting that it only served as a mild giggle, tending to take away from the built-up drama of the story.

It is understandable the upset many have over the release of this subject matter in a time of firearm mayhem, but what really bothers me is the timing vis-a-vis Halloween. Here's hoping sanity and security prevail, so as not to end up with a Thursday-Bloody-Thursday . . .… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

7

chaputomOct 7, 2019

That TIME magazine review is whack, lol. The movie was just fine. Dark, different, and complex character development.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

CristoParadoOct 5, 2019

In a fictional city that looks a lot like NYC, where public services are failing left and right and social tensions are rising, “Joker” tries and succeeds at telling two origins stories at once by presenting them as poignant counterparts andIn a fictional city that looks a lot like NYC, where public services are failing left and right and social tensions are rising, “Joker” tries and succeeds at telling two origins stories at once by presenting them as poignant counterparts and consequences of a society cannibalizing itself. The movie does a great job as a cautionary tale on the dangers of the epidemic of mental illness of our time and of the urgent need to shed a new light on it. It has the audience questioning the unnecessary inequalities that surround us and the imperstive need to reflect deeply on the social movements that promise change from a place of resentment. While Joker tumbles between reality and fantasy he’s at times frightening, seductive, pathetic, repulsive and endearing. He’s so right at questioning the sanity of a world that has him completely disenfranchised that I found myself rooting for him to get justice although I could never condone his violence. He just deserves to see that world go up in flames, and the world definitely deserves this son for no one could deny that he has come from its loins.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

makingscores0Oct 6, 2019

It's a good film, nothing more, nothing less. Based on all the talk about this film last month, id expected it to be really impactful, but it's not really any darker or any more shocking than what we've seen before. Joaquin Phoenix does aIt's a good film, nothing more, nothing less. Based on all the talk about this film last month, id expected it to be really impactful, but it's not really any darker or any more shocking than what we've seen before. Joaquin Phoenix does a fantastic job as the lead roll; scenes with his forced laughter are some of the best in the film. However outside of his acting, nothing about this film really stands out. - 7/10 expected more.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

FilmreactiviewOct 4, 2019

JOKER Film.reactiviews Audience REACTIONS at its North American PREMIERE:

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

7

AZAD_SHAKARAMIOct 13, 2019

THIS FILM NOT A MASTERPIECE BUT ONE OF THE BEST MOVIES BASED ON A COMIC FILM. BECAUSE THIS WASNT A SUPERHERO FILM. THIS IS A REAL FILM ABOUT HUMAN INTERIORS. How to become alienated And start a revolution.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

ArsenachosOct 7, 2019

Coming from the dude who made the hangover films (which I dont think highly of) I was surprised to see joker, not watching any trailers I was surprised with the final product. Acting was amazing. Cinematography was phenomenal. However theComing from the dude who made the hangover films (which I dont think highly of) I was surprised to see joker, not watching any trailers I was surprised with the final product. Acting was amazing. Cinematography was phenomenal. However the major flaw to this film is the pacing. It jumped alot and there were moments where I asked myself why this part was important. Lots of slow mo wide shots pan the film tine to reach over the 2 hour mark. Its action is intense which is brilliant. Watch it… Expand

5 of 6 users found this helpful51

All this user's reviews

7

KrakenOfPepsiOct 15, 2019

Beta-Taxi Driver that despite being held down by it's unfortunate connections with DC, actually manages to be a fairly enjoyable film overall.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Shabbir09Oct 22, 2019

A confused representation of insanity from a perspective of a sane person, a celebration of madness and chaos.
At last, I have watched one of the most anticipated movies of this year.
I experienced sadness, creepiness, joy, rage, confusionA confused representation of insanity from a perspective of a sane person, a celebration of madness and chaos.
At last, I have watched one of the most anticipated movies of this year.
I experienced sadness, creepiness, joy, rage, confusion altogether, and it felt good.
The story was above average, sometimes the director seemed confused about what he's trying to say.
There were so many beautiful distinct pieces scattered throughout the film that gives you chills but ultimately they failed to form a complete landscape, eventually it became a gorgeously crafted baroque film with a sheer hollow inside.
It criticizes our self-centered, pretentious, empathy less society but ironically the movie itself falls under its own sword.

Welcome, Tod Phillips to the big boy's club! His direction was crafty and pretty awesome though lack a little bit of originality. His trick with Arthur's illusion seemed a bit risky given its context. We will never know for sure if Arthur did go Murray's show or not!

The cinematography was superb, there were plenty of scenes that'll enter your mind and stay there for a while.

Joaquin Phoenix did his best, tried hard to embody the magnanimous character of Joker, he did pretty well, but sometimes it felt he was just trying too hard. Despite it's unfair to compare him with great heath ledger I must say he was able to pull it off impressively and takes this Joker to a distinct level. It was a one-man show and he's gonna get nominated for the academy award for sure.

One of the most entertaining and satisfying aspects of this film is its music composition, damn! It was too good, and you'll get to see some insane dance move as a bonus.
The main problem with this film is the lack of originality and a precise plot, sometimes it felt like the movie itself was confused and wandering aimlessly! That's why it failed to become a complete cinematic art rather than a montage of eye pleasing scenes, and nothing more.

Overall, despite its shortcomings, this movie is definitely one of the most exciting movie of this year.

My Rating:7.5/10… Expand

3 of 4 users found this helpful31

All this user's reviews

7

seventhobjectOct 25, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Слишком спорное отношение к фильму. Потому и не слишком понятно по каким критериям выставлять оценку. Не то, что фильм отвратителен или ещё чего. Нет. Великолепная игра Хоакина Феникса, отличная работа кинооператора и идеально подобранный сауднтрек, все это есть в этом фильме. А спорное отношение потому, что ты не знаешь - можно отнести этот фильм полноценно к кинокомиксам или ко взрослой картине про окончательно съехавшего с катушек психопата. Да, может действие картины и происходит по вселенной DC, но при всем при этом чувствуется некая отчужденность от классической серии. Если в"Хранителях", которые не менее мрачны, ещё чувствуется, что это вселенная DC, то в данном фильме, как я уже и сказал, не особо.
Непосредственно, сам Джокер появится в конце да и то, хочется сказать, что вот, да, это тот самый Джокер, который творит просто безбашеные поступки, приходя на телевидение и заявляя, что это он убил тех парней, а в итоге и затреливает самого ведущего. Это похоже на Джокера. Но ключевое слово - похоже. Это не Джокер. Это просто психопат, который на него похож.
Ах, и да. Чудесный киноляп - на моменте, когда Артур расстреливает тех трех парней в метро, он стреляет семь раз из шестизарядного револьвера. … Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

thouzeOct 25, 2019

Outrage has really ruined the conversation about movies. Not that it’s a bad thing, but outrage tends to overshadow movie's overall intentions. It’s no surprise that Joker ends up getting a nice share of the outrage, but it often leads theOutrage has really ruined the conversation about movies. Not that it’s a bad thing, but outrage tends to overshadow movie's overall intentions. It’s no surprise that Joker ends up getting a nice share of the outrage, but it often leads the question: Is the film worth all the controversy or is it a small issue blown up into a big one?

The film follows Arthur (Joaquin Phoenix) is older down on his luck man suffering through various mental illnesses, particularly his uncontrollable laughter in various scenarios. As his world crumbles around him, he finds himself teetering on reality and fantasy as he seeks to find some form of acceptance as he becomes the legend known as the Joker.

This is no surprise when I say that Joaquin Phoenix pulls out an amazing performance as the Joker. He finds a perfect line trying to humanize his character's disability and bringing the viewer into his mind and often sweeping the rug under our feet with an “unreliable narrator” presentation where it makes you wonder what really happens and what doesn’t. The film gorgeously re-creates an early 1980’s New York aesthetic with the grime, trash and somehow frames it in a pretty well-shot way.

The biggest problem is when portraying a character with disabilities, Director Todd Phillips shoots the film in the foot with often falling back on cliche old demeaning natures. Particularly one character who’s only character trait is his dwarfism and is often made fun of his height, that even involves a pretty dark scene later on which is hard to tell if it’s a payoff for a joke or not. Also, the film borrows a couple too many pages from Taxi Driver, which ironically stars Robert De Nero who’s in this film as well and is pretty great as a talk show host.

Joker will divide many people and I think that’s the goal of the film. Many will like the portrayal of the villain, and many will dislike the violence and how certain things are represented. But I feel what many will agree on is how Joaquin Phoenix knocks it out of the park.… Expand

5 of 6 users found this helpful51

All this user's reviews

7

fractadilOct 26, 2019

one of the best movies ever made . you can see,feel and react after seeing all the struggle that Arther Fleck have been through.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

ckeppnerOct 27, 2019

Joker is a compelling drama that is surprisingly sad. It's certainly not as graphic as the critics have suggested. However, the whole film is a pretty dreary look at mental health treatment in America. Overall, it's a really entertainingJoker is a compelling drama that is surprisingly sad. It's certainly not as graphic as the critics have suggested. However, the whole film is a pretty dreary look at mental health treatment in America. Overall, it's a really entertaining movie with great acting and well worth the watch.… Expand

4 of 5 users found this helpful41

All this user's reviews

7

oysteimsOct 30, 2019

The Joker was a very good movie, I won't say it's the best movie I have seen this year, but it was a good movie. There are probably some deserved criticism and praise, although I disagree with the people hailing this as a masterpiece and theThe Joker was a very good movie, I won't say it's the best movie I have seen this year, but it was a good movie. There are probably some deserved criticism and praise, although I disagree with the people hailing this as a masterpiece and the people trashing it.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

SrCobeNov 4, 2019

El cine de superheroes por lo general me suele gustar poco y no lo consumo mucho más allá de algunas excepciones... Y puedo decir que esta es una de ellas, realmente disfrute de la película, muy buenas elecciones en la música y visualmenteEl cine de superheroes por lo general me suele gustar poco y no lo consumo mucho más allá de algunas excepciones... Y puedo decir que esta es una de ellas, realmente disfrute de la película, muy buenas elecciones en la música y visualmente hermosa. El personaje y la situación por la que pasa genera mucha empatia e incomodidad. Si bien estuvo genial verla en el cine, no puedo esperar a verla más detenidamente en mi casa.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

morebutterplzNov 4, 2019

This was worth seeing~ mind you this isn't your run of the mill kick your ass, guns blazing and lethal social experiment Joker involved film. This was a dramatic origins story of our favorite sick and psychotic villain The Joker.
This wasThis was worth seeing~ mind you this isn't your run of the mill kick your ass, guns blazing and lethal social experiment Joker involved film. This was a dramatic origins story of our favorite sick and psychotic villain The Joker.
This was very relatable and you start to gain a better understanding of how the Joker came to be. Highly recommend you watch this flick.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

BarbaLongdoOestDec 3, 2019

Joker é bom; mas não é tudo isso, é um filme que carece de uma emoção e de uma caminhada que cative, o filme tenta ser complexo e profundo mas só o que consegue é uma abordagem seca e sem filtro, no final das contas a única coisa que vale aJoker é bom; mas não é tudo isso, é um filme que carece de uma emoção e de uma caminhada que cative, o filme tenta ser complexo e profundo mas só o que consegue é uma abordagem seca e sem filtro, no final das contas a única coisa que vale a pena aqui é atuação de Joaquin Phoenix,um filme que só tem uma boa atuação não faz dele automaticamente bom… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

EduardoBrennerDec 6, 2019

Joker is a good movie that wants to think it's the film of a decade. Interesting, irreverent but still falls into the well know good vs. evil war, where things are never really full represented, but one way viewed. Essentially, joker is aJoker is a good movie that wants to think it's the film of a decade. Interesting, irreverent but still falls into the well know good vs. evil war, where things are never really full represented, but one way viewed. Essentially, joker is a film that emerged for the audience due an enormous identification with a character's resentment over others, society and the self failure he blaimes the world for. Still, can't find the subtlety the theme needs to find truth and dimension on the character construction. Again, Joker (2019) is a beautiful film that needs to understand it's nature and stop pretending to be a life changing story telling, accepting it's faults and growing on them.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

PooheadJan 8, 2020

Joaquin phoenix's performance is amazing but the film itself is a bit messy and some odd choices overall its a solid film with a good main performance

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

BearpooJan 3, 2020

Great cinematography, beautifully shot and directed, good color-grading and a lot of love went into this film... But the story feels empty and just dragging along. This could have been a great short-film. There could have been a bit moreGreat cinematography, beautifully shot and directed, good color-grading and a lot of love went into this film... But the story feels empty and just dragging along. This could have been a great short-film. There could have been a bit more development in character or story. And they could have just let go of the whole Batman Universe, it doesn't add anything special... It's not a movie I would watch a second time.… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

BukyxJan 13, 2020

Buena, pero algo sobrevalorada solo por llamarse JOKER, un guion con mula profundidad que se basó demasiado en 2 peliculas de Martin scorsesse

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

7

Stream2BigScreeJan 28, 2020

Joker But Not A Joke

Knock, knock. Who’s there? Stream to Big Screen. Stream to Big Screen, who? Stream to Big Screen the best site for movie reviews on the internet! Corny? I think not. Welcome back everyone! This week we were able to viewJoker But Not A Joke

Knock, knock. Who’s there? Stream to Big Screen. Stream to Big Screen, who? Stream to Big Screen the best site for movie reviews on the internet! Corny? I think not. Welcome back everyone! This week we were able to view the highly anticipated movie, Joker, starring Joaquin Phoenix. Joker is a standalone origin film of many people’s favorite DC Comics villain. The movie is set in the worst of times in Gotham where violence is rampant, civil unrest is prevalent, and the rodent population is no joke. This movie follows Phoenix as the main character, Arthur Fleck. Arthur is a young man longing to fit in and aspiring to be a comedian but is dealing with a bevvy of issues, primarily mental illness. The film leads us through Arthur’s path to becoming the titular Joker.

While this movie is titled Joker, the theme/takeaway from this movie is no joke. Ultimately, this movie hits way too close to home for American society presently. The bullied, belittled, forgotten person in society deals with mental illness without an appropriate support system, and he has access to a gun. This storyline has become an all too familiar in mainstream media today. For this reason, Joker is a very good conversation piece. But didn’t we come to see a movie based on a comic book? This isn’t what I wanted! Well, this is important to know. DON’T go into this movie expecting a comic book like story or a connection to the comics, other than the name.

With that said, Warner Bros. couldn’t have found a better or more experienced lead actor than Phoenix. Phoenix definitely has practice acting like a power seeking maniac begging to be remembered. I’m looking at you Commodus! From the beginning to the end, Phoenix takes us through every single range of emotion Arthur experiences. It truly is quite impressive. Phoenix’s acting and the movie provide a great feeling of anxiety, not necessarily suspense, throughout. Unfortunately, the director either held Phoenix back or chose to feature too many early movie boring set up scenes. When Phoenix acts his craziest, the movie is epic but there is just far too little of it to get over the boring parts. In a way, I felt deceived by the intense commercials and trailers. We’ve been waiting for nearly a year to see this movie. Yes, the movie provides a few intense moments but far too few. And, far too little of Zazie Beetz! Honestly, they could’ve interchanged her with any actress to do the same thing. Nevertheless, her presence was still welcomed.

And then when I wasn’t bored, I was predicting exactly what was supposed to be a surprise or twist in the movie. I’m not sure if it was the scene selection or a purposeful directorial decision, but at times the same scenes just didn’t make sense when I was watching them. Eventually, my suspicions were confirmed and I just said ,”duh!”

All of that said, Joker delivers in some aspects (I didn’t even mention the great score in the movie) but ultimately will let you down. Joaquin does a good job as the Joker, but he’s never going to be regarded like a Heath Ledger once the dust settles. Try to check this movie out at a matinee time, if your a big Joker/DC fan. Everyone else, you may be disappointed in a matinee price but for a reasonable price it’s worth it or an early streaming rental.

The Stream: Takes unbelievably long to get moving and then supremely predictable.

The Big Screen: Joaquin delivers an uneven performance but worth watching.

The Final Bill: Joker is an overhyped film that will create some conversations about mental health issues in society.

-S2S: Movie Review… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

PsofixFeb 6, 2020

Despite Phoenix's huge performance that deserves an oscar ,the film hasn't anything more to give.

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

7

RedUnicycleMar 27, 2020

This is the type of film that only succeeds to be amazing on surface level, but not a truly great movie. It’s visually stunning, it’s brilliantly acted by incredible actor Joaquin Phoenix, it’s empowered by the chilling musical score ofThis is the type of film that only succeeds to be amazing on surface level, but not a truly great movie. It’s visually stunning, it’s brilliantly acted by incredible actor Joaquin Phoenix, it’s empowered by the chilling musical score of talented composer Hildur Guðnadóttir. Everything in this movie is exceptional except two things: screenplay and direction. The movie is strongly derivative of Scorsese’s Taxi Driver and The King of Comedy, yet sadly fails at being anywhere near as deep, clever or subtle as either of them. But hey, at least Todd Phillips recognizes good films, despite his pretensions in making a culturally important one.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

IAmaMovieGeekMay 7, 2020

Joaquin Phoenix definitely deserved his oscar for this film. He has an outstanding, incredible performance as Joker in this movie. Probably DC's most impressive film so far. The soundtrack is amazing, the cinematography is great, and it'sJoaquin Phoenix definitely deserved his oscar for this film. He has an outstanding, incredible performance as Joker in this movie. Probably DC's most impressive film so far. The soundtrack is amazing, the cinematography is great, and it's good movie with some dark themes. It isn't perfect thou. It gets a 7/10.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

JordanLaytonApr 30, 2020

Overhyped in the name of getting quotes like "there is the world before Joker and there is the world after Joked" spread all over the internet for reviewer clout. This movie is far from disappointing, but ANYTHING would have been after allOverhyped in the name of getting quotes like "there is the world before Joker and there is the world after Joked" spread all over the internet for reviewer clout. This movie is far from disappointing, but ANYTHING would have been after all the hype this film got (supposed standing ovations at festivals and winning an award a bunch of best picture winners have won previously).

Now, about the actual movie In a lot of ways, its Taxi Driver with a DC skin. It has the same tone and a lot of the same themes, but plot beats and base character motivations are drastically different. What you've heard about Phoenix's performance is all true, but I also loved the sometimes demented, sometimes classic style of cinematography and how the score would switch back and forth between sounding like what the character's perceived feelings on the events/situations were in a scene and what a sane person's perceptions of that same scene would be (triumphant vs. horrific).

In addition to Jaoquin's performance, I thought that the few brief moments the supporting cast were given to play in were acted flawlessly as well. Zazzy Beats, Bryan Tyree Henry, and Deniro all had a brief moment to shine and they all took full advantage. I only have two real complaints about the film. First, I thought almost all additional tie-ins to the DC universe were the weakest parts of the movie. One with pearls felt particularly shoehorned in. And second, I wish the film had cut to black on the last line of dialogue Phoenix delivered. It would have been just a bit more effective than the more drawn out ending we got, I think, because that last line has some real punch to it. Maybe it would have felt cheesy. Lmk. Not a masterpiece, but I really enjoyed it and will definitely see it again.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

wayrezMay 15, 2020

I'd like to pay tribute to the creators: how talented under the vernacular of a comic book people were sold psychological acute social drama.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

Toasty87Jul 10, 2020

A very good modern take on the joker character I approve the concept and design but wished it continued a little bit more with the ending.

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

7

AdamWalker-Sep 27, 2021

I think people greatly overvalue this movie because the protagonist is one of the most important villains in history, but if we change the name? Would they continue to give him the same attention that they gave him at the time?

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

RexloxSep 28, 2021

Many told me that this movie was the best of the past decade ... are you sure you didn't see a different movie?

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Rickniks38May 8, 2022

Like how this film establishes an origin story of sorts for the Joker instead of Ace chemicals being the reason why he is evil. Instead, society created the Joker in a way by basically telling him oh you like laughing at being a horribleLike how this film establishes an origin story of sorts for the Joker instead of Ace chemicals being the reason why he is evil. Instead, society created the Joker in a way by basically telling him oh you like laughing at being a horrible person and hurting people? okay than I guess I will be the worst one of them all, which is fitting since he wanted to become a comedian.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Farwell3dOct 6, 2019

Very good lead performance + very mediocre script + a good cast + boring direction + good cinematography = the most over hyped 6/10 movie ever.

1 of 11 users found this helpful110

All this user's reviews

6

netflicOct 21, 2019

I am not a big fan of comic book movies or superhero vs. super-villain ones.
Even though the action happens in the imaginary City of Gotham, this film does not fit properly into that category. There is no hero in the movie, and the Joker isI am not a big fan of comic book movies or superhero vs. super-villain ones.
Even though the action happens in the imaginary City of Gotham, this film does not fit properly into that category. There is no hero in the movie, and the Joker is hardly THE villain.

Without spoiling the movie I would like to mention that I do not agree with all the hype about it. Especially with its moral and political message.

The movie is done extremely well technically. Joaquin Phoenix is a great actor (what a surprise!). Is it his best role? I don't think so. For an actor of his caliber it is not that difficult to play a mentally disturbed person. No doubt, he carries the whole film.

I did not like the script except the very end of it that puts the whole content into a question. Did it ALL happen? Or was it just a hallucination of a sick mind?

As a serious movie it is not working. But you cannot expect if from Marvel series.
As piece of entertainment, it definitely found huge audience. Me excluded.

I do not regret that I saw it. But I will not want to see it the second time.
Your mileage might vary.… Expand

2 of 7 users found this helpful25

All this user's reviews

6

bl_nkMar 1, 2022

Was initially excited to see a plausible Joker origin story, but the transition from the build-up to the conclusion was very abrupt and disjointed. The Joker's climactic monologue was a non-sensical jumble of adolescent edgelord talkingWas initially excited to see a plausible Joker origin story, but the transition from the build-up to the conclusion was very abrupt and disjointed. The Joker's climactic monologue was a non-sensical jumble of adolescent edgelord talking points with no relation to what came before it. Not a coherent movie, this is a simple person's idea of a masterpiece.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

crnppsclsOct 19, 2019

It was ok. Some of the highlights were that Phoenix carried the whole film, and comfortably. The cinematography was so elegant to show the descent of Fleck into the abyss, as if to instil empathy in the viewer, bravo.
The score wasIt was ok. Some of the highlights were that Phoenix carried the whole film, and comfortably. The cinematography was so elegant to show the descent of Fleck into the abyss, as if to instil empathy in the viewer, bravo.
The score was atmospheric and i also enjoyed the stylising although it could've been set in the 60's and not the 80's.

Didn't love the screenplay. There were a few plot holes and the story simply wasn't engaging enough. It's like they try make you empathic to the protagonist by showing you his run of bad luck and fortune but he actually rides it pretty well.
The bouts of ultra violence are sporadic yet seem forced. Ultimately, the portrayal of how his psychosis manifests is not believable. If the movie was just called "Fleck" i wouldn't have bothered. It's been shelved in the 'ok but don't need to see it again' part of my brain along with Taxi driver, Requiem for a dream , Leaving las vegas etc.
Disappointing.… Expand

3 of 11 users found this helpful38

All this user's reviews

6

Lord-XaffaxOct 27, 2019

I gave this movie a 6 because it is not a bad movie. However, as a movie about the Joker it misses the mark completely. In the world of super villains the Joker is one of the darkest most unnerving charachters ever. The most commonI gave this movie a 6 because it is not a bad movie. However, as a movie about the Joker it misses the mark completely. In the world of super villains the Joker is one of the darkest most unnerving charachters ever. The most common misconception is that the Joker has anything to do with comedy or being funny...He is the personification of something far more evil. The darkest part of the human psyche. The tendensy to find gratification and pleasure in the pain, suffering and death of other human beings. Sadism... The makers of this movie totaly seem to miss this point. In fact this Joker barely could be called a super villain. He doesn't scheme, he isn't that bright, and he doesn't kill that many people. He certainly doesn't prey on the weak and vulnarable...Actualy... he has nothing in common with the creep we know as THE JOKER… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

joehmooreOct 25, 2019

This is solely based on the last twenty minutes. Otherwise it was a total waste of time.

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

6

nyran125tkOct 15, 2019

It was ok. For the type of controversy its getting, i was expecting something really realistic and dramatic on a much harder level than this. But to be honest, that train acene was just self defense, if it was a ounch or a knife or a gun,It was ok. For the type of controversy its getting, i was expecting something really realistic and dramatic on a much harder level than this. But to be honest, that train acene was just self defense, if it was a ounch or a knife or a gun, those guys deserved it and the carnage scenes where he shoots Robert Di Niro, that would be something The Joker would do to get attention anyway. I think The Dark Knight was way more interesting, fun to watch and had more deadly violence like blowing up.a hospital in a terrorost attack, was much more provoking than this. This Joker was a
Sad individual that eventually blamed his mom for everything. Fine. But the controversy surrounding this, is completrly ridicous. sick, twisteed, sad ind… Expand

2 of 8 users found this helpful26

All this user's reviews

6

Brent_MarchantOct 4, 2019

Despite a mostly solid (though occasionally hammy) performance by Joaquin Phoenix and an excellent production design, this much-awaited origin story about Batman's vile nemesis falls short on a number of other levels. Problems with unevenDespite a mostly solid (though occasionally hammy) performance by Joaquin Phoenix and an excellent production design, this much-awaited origin story about Batman's vile nemesis falls short on a number of other levels. Problems with uneven pacing, mishandled back story revelations, heavy-handed sociopolitical allegories, excessive narrative elements, violence bordering on gratuitous and plot holes aplenty all conspire to weaken an otherwise-ambitious story aimed at taking the comic book genre in a new direction. What's more, the film features an ending that's out of place compared to the apparent climax that preceded it. And then there are derivative elements taken almost verbatim from a variety of other pictures, including "Falling Down," "Network" and "The King of Comedy," among others. But what's perhaps most distressing is the message the film sends, one that's dangerous, even if accurate in its depiction of the state of affairs in the US today. What this film gets right is impressive, but, unfortunately, there's not enough of that compared the package overall.… Expand

0 of 15 users found this helpful015

All this user's reviews

6

TejasNairOct 9, 2019

Despite the hardcore and jumpscare violence, the so-so portrayal of mental illness and its consequences when it goes untreated, the eerie score played on repeat, great dialogues 90% of which are polished as punchlines, the brilliant backstoryDespite the hardcore and jumpscare violence, the so-so portrayal of mental illness and its consequences when it goes untreated, the eerie score played on repeat, great dialogues 90% of which are polished as punchlines, the brilliant backstory of the DC universe, and a charming performance (of a life time) by Joaquin Phoenix, Joker was an underwhelming crime drama for me. TN.… Expand

2 of 11 users found this helpful29

All this user's reviews

6

ohnomrbillOct 15, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. loved this powerful movie only until it was not clear what was really happening and what was only in his mind. they sabotage most of the action by suggesting much of it was possibly in his overactive imagination, WTF? sorry, for me, that killed the movie.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

6

quake2thNov 24, 2019

A masterpiece, but let me explain my vote of 6.

This is an art-film, it has absolutely nothing to do with Batman or Joker. It's crystal clear that they had a script that was ready, but no one was willing to produce it because it's notA masterpiece, but let me explain my vote of 6.

This is an art-film, it has absolutely nothing to do with Batman or Joker. It's crystal clear that they had a script that was ready, but no one was willing to produce it because it's not "superhero movies", so they put the title "Joker" on it and added some Batman backstory.

Joaquin Phoenix is absolutely phenomenal, it's a masterclass in theatre-acting, obviously it's not cinema acting, but who cares.

Photography is insanely good, each scene is perfectly framed to the point of perfection.

I'm giving 6 because it's a shame that such a great movie had to put "Joker" in the title just to pitch the movie to some movie studio manager. It's a real shame and people should not accept it.

Masterpiece and oscar winning performance, shameful actions by production companies, it's unexcusable.… Expand

5 of 8 users found this helpful53

All this user's reviews

6

Taser123Oct 14, 2019

Not a bad film but surely an overrated one. I really don't understand why it's considered a masterpiece. The only actor in this film that does an excellent job is Phoenix, giving an awesome, gripping, Oscar worthy performance. Aside fromNot a bad film but surely an overrated one. I really don't understand why it's considered a masterpiece. The only actor in this film that does an excellent job is Phoenix, giving an awesome, gripping, Oscar worthy performance. Aside from that, the film is missing another 30 minutes of character development for Arthur Fleck at least. His transition is too quick. That said, this isn't the Joker. It's a 21st century rendition of Taxi Driver, designed to make loads of cash by having Joker's image plastered all over. The rioting makes no sense, and cannot be excused by having someone say "It's Gotham so it makes sense." The idea that the media would put a murder of three businessmen on the front pages and give it such a wide coverage in an already murder-infested town of Gotham barely makes any sense. Also, easily one of the worst things about this film is, they spoiled ALL of the "epic" lines in the trailers. The script isn't really anything to make you amazed or perk your eyebrows. It kind of seems that the director had a good vision, but got lazy halfway into the making of this film. There isn't a single scene in this film that would make me go back to it, not a single scene that made my hairs stand up or anything like that. Not gonna watch it again.… Expand

0 of 4 users found this helpful04

All this user's reviews

6

JLuis_001Oct 4, 2019

The message Joker appears to give it's simple: If you're laughing of me instead of with me then you will suffer and despair because of me. A harsh and obscure statement but it's not away from reality.

For comic book readers this film can beThe message Joker appears to give it's simple: If you're laughing of me instead of with me then you will suffer and despair because of me. A harsh and obscure statement but it's not away from reality.

For comic book readers this film can be considered as a story of the disappeared Elseworlds label or the new DC Black Label. However, there's something that bothers me a lot about it and that is that Joker itself has nothing of the Joker.

Although the film seems to take certain inspirations from the character's stories, especially The Killing Joke, in a way, an essential way, Todd Phillips created the story of a mentally ill person and disguised him as the Joker and that's a problem because although it addresses a different perspective of the character's beginnings, in reality the Joker, the image itself is just a simple collateral element of the film's character's job.

The clown means nothing, not even in the political and social context that the director tried to give to his story.
The clown is only the chosen costume. It could have been something else but that ultimately wouldn't have been the Joker and believe me when I tell you that a film about a mentally ill person with murderous tendencies is much more commercial when you sell it as a famous character, than if you had only made a film about a mentally ill person with murderous tendencies.

Unfortunately Joker is an interesting story of misery and rot but unable to be more provocative and frankly the story is barely enough to compensate for the entire film. It's the performance of Joaquin Phoenix that sustains it.
Todd Phillips makes clear how limited he is as a filmmaker because he never achieves a memorable or spectacular scene, he just drives the story while letting Phoenix do his job. No one else in the cast is relevant, not even De Niro, they're just people around Arthur Fleck and his mental descent which reaches its breaking point in that violent final stretch but unfortunately never feels like the Joker, or at least the Joker who has always been known.

Joker isn't a bad film at all but I don't see nothing great either.
It's a different perspective and a different approach to comic book adaptations and shows that contrasting takes can be made with such stories and characters and for me that's a good thing.

And personally despite the good work of Phoenix and although the comparison might be unfair, Heath Ledger's performance remains unrivaled.… Expand

0 of 12 users found this helpful012

All this user's reviews

6

abdallah9luluOct 5, 2019

i think it is overrated its a good movie nevertheless with great scenes but not good enough to deserve all that praise

3 of 17 users found this helpful314

All this user's reviews

6

Jaredc324Apr 9, 2022

The marvel boyband fans are here to praise. But what we have is a movie about a victimized person who puts his shame out there for the world to laugh at, and we're suppose to stand with him. I don't think the approach to the character was allThe marvel boyband fans are here to praise. But what we have is a movie about a victimized person who puts his shame out there for the world to laugh at, and we're suppose to stand with him. I don't think the approach to the character was all that integral, but what holds up is Joaquin Phoenix's graceful performance. But i've seen better works from him in "The Master" and "Walk the Line." The aesthetic is pleasing nonetheless.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

chem11Oct 5, 2019

This film is nice reference to Scorsese’s film. Starting from screen play up to some visual decisions and composition. Some storylines are seems a bit spare to all story. They’re just for ( maybe) future connections to cinematic universe.This film is nice reference to Scorsese’s film. Starting from screen play up to some visual decisions and composition. Some storylines are seems a bit spare to all story. They’re just for ( maybe) future connections to cinematic universe. This is film of our time, contemporary. Scorsese never wouldn’t film something like this, but is it good?… Expand

1 of 8 users found this helpful17

All this user's reviews

6

toonvailoFeb 1, 2020

Abstract:
The Joker is a love letter to Scorsese, a call back to favorite art films with a universally recognized man at its center. Truthfully it hammers away at its audience that society treats the mentally ill, and anyone who is remotelyAbstract:
The Joker is a love letter to Scorsese, a call back to favorite art films with a universally recognized man at its center. Truthfully it hammers away at its audience that society treats the mentally ill, and anyone who is remotely different, terribly. If you were unaware of this fact and want to feel “artsy”, this film is for you. Otherwise it’s a hard pass. Review:
A foreword, my personal bias may have tainted this review as it was impossible to escape the controversy leading up to this film. It was also unavoidable to ignore the way the movie bragged about copying other “art films”.

Where to begin with the Joker. This film is beautifully shot, and thoughtfully tries to recreate the classic aesthetic of films like Taxi Driver or the King of Comedy. Joaquin Phoenix masterfully throws his all physically and emotionally into the ill mind of Arthur Fleck, aka the Joker. Sadly for all that the film tries to replicate, it remains just that; a replication. It lacks the true heart behind art films, and insists upon itself that it truly is a work of art. Let’s break down the two key elements the movie tries to convey. Mental Illness: While the movie tries to paint the image that Arthur is mentally ill, being diagnosed with a “vague disorder”; by the movie’s end it undoes the effort it puts in. We see Arthur hallucinate about being on TV or in a relationship with his neighbor, but these are short lived; he’s not delusional he’s daydreaming. And the emotion Phoenix puts into these realizations show us that he knows what’s real and what’s not. Next let’s examine his nervous tick, his uncanny laughter. Ticks are not a mental illness, everyone has small ticks; this one is just unnerving. But rolling with this being a “sign of mental illness” is still hard to swallow, the execution and timing are off. His laughter is neither convenient for the plot, nor random enough to be a consistent piece of his character. The only consistency with his laughter is to show that society is mean. A great segue into the next theme:

Cruel Society: It should be no shock to anyone that society and mobs can be cruel. However the citizens of Gotham seem to be an extra special brand of terrible. They go out of their way to not only berate and belittle Arthur, but to physically attack and assault him. In a movie based “in reality” I could not suspend belief long enough to imagine three Wayne Enterprise employees breaking into song together to attack a stranger. That brings us to the vengeance of Thomas Wayne. Now I was keen to see this take on Wayne. It makes sense for a man in his position to be a villain to Arthur. I could understand him being cruel, or two-faced; showing vile contempt for the man claiming to be his bastard son, while smiling and feigning charity while on camera. But this isn’t the case. Thomas Wayne is as cruel on camera as he is to Aruthur’s face. Is this really supposed to be the man championed as a Pillar of Gotham? Needless to say these two themes coalesce into Joker’s main point: If you are mentally ill, or different, or a minority, or look weird, society will treat you horribly. This should not be profound, nor does it need to be lauded. Nevertheless it spends 2 hours and 2 minutes elaborating on this until you feel sick. Actually to the film’s credit it does that quite well; it doesn’t forgive or excuse Arthur for his eventual crimes and murders. By the end you are horrified.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

SgtviperOct 13, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It was interesting to see the Joker get a standalone film. I feel as if people over hyped the film not to say it was bad. There were some scenes in the film that felt unnecessary but what made it worth it was exposure of Arthur's mentality. The idea of having a monster come from a society that is supposed to be normal was exceptional. The constant laughing was somewhat annoying though I'd let that slide. Another thing worth mentioning was Arthur killing his adoptive mother, it wasn't dramatic enough. I will give the writers praise for how Thomas Wayne and Arthur met, simply gold. I understand that most of the way how the character was used wasn't based from the comics but it's fun to see things from a different perspective. If there is a sequel to be intact in the future, moving the storyline from the comics wouldn't be bad as long as it's not too far from the source.… Expand

1 of 5 users found this helpful14

All this user's reviews

6

EqFistOct 3, 2019

Is it a Joker ?!

No, and again no ... Only the name is left of the character. Absolutely boring and dull film. Probably at Batman vs. Superman level. The atmosphere is extremely repulsive, depressing, which contributes to the unremarkableIs it a Joker ?!

No, and again no ... Only the name is left of the character.

Absolutely boring and dull film. Probably at Batman vs. Superman level.
The atmosphere is extremely repulsive, depressing, which contributes to the unremarkable and the same type of soundtrack and painful florist from which gives death.

The film is a hodgepodge from Taxi Driver and King of Comedy, which is extremely unsuccessful, it can be seen that Phillips is impotent in terms of ideas, this is evidenced by the weak script of the film, which works only because it shows the realities of the world. I personally was not interested in looking at it, because it’s already been wiped into holes.

The game is partially saved from despondency by the game of the Phoenix, it is not in vain that they consider him a good actor, but it could not do without replay, he does not pull on Oscar. The Ledger version is extremely far away.

As a result, we have a noticeably overestimated film, which in fact is one-time. There is no desire to review.… Expand

8 of 35 users found this helpful827

All this user's reviews

6

UncleWillardDec 18, 2019

So I finally saw the joker, and it didn't really surprise me. I expected it to appeal to a certain demographic, and it absolutely does. Phoenix's performance is stellar, which I expected given past performances in The Master and You WereSo I finally saw the joker, and it didn't really surprise me. I expected it to appeal to a certain demographic, and it absolutely does. Phoenix's performance is stellar, which I expected given past performances in The Master and You Were Never Really Here, but the plot was predictable. I get it, it's an origin story, but if you stack it up against Ledger's performance, I don't like this Joker at all. It's Taxi Driver if Travis Bickle were a victim of abuse and overt mental illness. It mirrors that movie in many ways, but one thing I'll say for Travis, we didn't have to set him up as this ultimate victim. Unlike Ledger's Joker, a sociopath who would have made this Joker's past a lie to feign victimhood, throwing off his adversaries, Phoenix's Joker is a victim. He's a man with no agency who finds it in a gun. It's the dream of every incel and nutjob who's ever felt they were given a raw deal and finally snapped into a beautiful swan song of violence and retribution. What's truly terrifying about the joker is the mob. Much like Antifa or the alt-right today, the mob is looking for any excuse to be a mob, and they look to this broken man who's only claim to fame is shooting unarmed people (granted, the first time is in defense). It's as if the entire population of disaffected white 20-somethings rallied around Dylan Roof or the guy who shot up the theater in Colorado. Again, Phoenix's performance is legendary and he dives into this character. He is Arthur Fleck, who is a more interesting character to me than the Joker. I don't know if that was the intent of the film, but it kind of undercuts the agency of superheroes/villains. You don't walk away from Joker hating the bad guy. Many walk away on his side. On the side of the mob, where it's far easier to protest and react violently in the face of adversity than it is to actually do the hard work of fixing problems or people. It's the lazy internet route to social change that leaves the same problems covered in a layer of poopy pants that no one realizes how special someone is. In fact, you could rename this Travis Bickle's Afterbirth.… Expand

7 of 11 users found this helpful74

All this user's reviews

6

Mauro_LanariNov 14, 2019

(Mauro Lanari)
"Wired" wrote it is "useful for teaching young people who Travis Bickle is". But is it so necessary to know "Taxi Driver"? And then is this "Joker" reducible to a remake only of that movie or of "The King of Comedy" (1983)? If(Mauro Lanari)
"Wired" wrote it is "useful for teaching young people who Travis Bickle is". But is it so necessary to know "Taxi Driver"? And then is this "Joker" reducible to a remake only of that movie or of "The King of Comedy" (1983)? If anything, it's a Scorsesian roundup in which minor works are often better than major ones, and Todd Phillips is adept at paying homage also to the first ones, from the sequences on the stairs of "New York, New York" (1977) to the ambulances of "Bringing Out the Dead" (1999). It's a film that flows fast, but that is so much a merit as a defect: for example, there is no serious deepening of the (bidirectional?) link between psychic discomfort and social unease, a "praise of folly" more exhibited than explained, or of the problematic integration of subjectivity into the Warholian world of entertainment (and in fact the failed seminarian dedicated an entire film to each of these aspects). In short, it lets itself be seen, often even to its detriment. And I would have left the invasion of mice at the Camus of "La Peste" (1947).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

o_retyMar 20, 2021

Americans and their pathetic attempts at building a mythology. Apart from the "twist" with the black girl, thanks to the unreliable narrator shtick, nothing resembling any sense whatsoever ever happens in this movie and all this convolutedAmericans and their pathetic attempts at building a mythology. Apart from the "twist" with the black girl, thanks to the unreliable narrator shtick, nothing resembling any sense whatsoever ever happens in this movie and all this convoluted drama doesn't work on me, at all. And don't think the programming is off here. You see, violence is fun. It will make all of your problems go away. Also, aren't people crazy? Unhappy for no reason. And life is a failed comedian stage. And you're the comedian.… Expand

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

6

Johnnybravo8125Oct 3, 2019

Very few parts felt like he was the Joker. The build up is slow and drawn out. Easily could have been thirty minutes shorter. The acting is great but the character is poorly written.

8 of 33 users found this helpful825

All this user's reviews

6

RecepJan 25, 2020

Evet film güzel ancak aşırı derecede gereksiz filmin gidişatını yavaşlatan sahneler var bunun dışında hikayeyi güzel bir biçimde aktarıyor ama filmin sonu hariç hiç bir aksiyonlu jokeri yansıtan işler yok sırf jokeri karakterinin nasılEvet film güzel ancak aşırı derecede gereksiz filmin gidişatını yavaşlatan sahneler var bunun dışında hikayeyi güzel bir biçimde aktarıyor ama filmin sonu hariç hiç bir aksiyonlu jokeri yansıtan işler yok sırf jokeri karakterinin nasıl doğduğu nasıl bu hale geldiğini bayağı bi anlatıyor film idare eder ancak izlemezsenizde bir şey kaybetmezsiniz… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

sbgskylordNov 20, 2019

It doesn't respect to the source material so if you expect a comic accurate Joker origin story you'll be disappointed. There are some nods to different storylines of the Joker but not enough to make us feel like we are watching "The ClownIt doesn't respect to the source material so if you expect a comic accurate Joker origin story you'll be disappointed. There are some nods to different storylines of the Joker but not enough to make us feel like we are watching "The Clown Prince of Crime". Only thing really shines about this movie is Phoenix's acting performance. Basically it's a descending into madness story with borrowed popularity of The Joker.… Expand

3 of 5 users found this helpful32

All this user's reviews

6

RodukaOct 14, 2019

It's a movie about a guy that is really bad at something, but he thinks he's good. He fails in succeed, and then he blames everyone but him for his failure. And he decides to kill everyone who is honest with him, 'cause he can't be upset.It's a movie about a guy that is really bad at something, but he thinks he's good. He fails in succeed, and then he blames everyone but him for his failure. And he decides to kill everyone who is honest with him, 'cause he can't be upset. Original? No. Deep? Hell No! A masterpiece? Are you on crack? But I bet you've met a lot of young folks just like that, Don't you? Full of self pity, and no self-criticism. That's Joker. Now the technical aspects of the movie are good. The acting is over but pretty good, the cinematography is great and the music is the best part of it. And compared to other Marvel movies ... it's Apocalypse Now. But it's not the best Joker, not even the second best. It's not Phoenix's best work, not even his second best work. And it's not the best, not the second best, not even the third best movie I've seen this year. But if The Black Panther made it to the best movies list last year, why not this movie?… Expand

3 of 11 users found this helpful38

All this user's reviews

6

oIHLoOct 4, 2019

A bold, fascinating while problematic and, worst of all, manipulative portrait of a d deranged man. A certain subplot and subsequent it-is-not-my-fault mentality really bothered me.

2 of 16 users found this helpful214

All this user's reviews

6

DaUnknownCriticOct 4, 2019

Joker has problems. Pun intended. And I’m not referring to Arthur Fleck, -Todd Phillips’ latest incarnation of the Clown Prince of Crime – but the picture itself.

As if the weight of 80 years in print or 5 decades on the screen weren’tJoker has problems. Pun intended. And I’m not referring to Arthur Fleck, -Todd Phillips’ latest incarnation of the Clown Prince of Crime – but the picture itself.

As if the weight of 80 years in print or 5 decades on the screen weren’t oceanically crushing enough, we now are served another incarnation of an antagonist as ubiquitously immortal as Moriarty or Hannibal Lecter. What more can be said? Is there any meat left on the bones of the mythology?

If one were to believe the marketing, we’re going to see a Taxi Driver meets The King of Comedy meets The French Connection. Sounds great, right? It would be, but it was marketing.

What Joker does deliver is a thin screed on mental illness in an even sicker society. This society in decline has sensibilities contemporary to our own, despite the trappings of the 1970’s which seem like an aesthetic afterthought. Those versed in Batlore are presented Warner Brothers intellectual property anchors to orient themselves in the expanding cinematic graphic novel universe, but they are halfhearted name dropping at best. Trappings.

At the heart of Joker is Arthur Fleck – ironically named. Joaquin Phoenix is masterful, more charming and sad than haunting. Despite his valiant energies, he’s not given much with which to work. Often times, he’s left to his own devices to soft shoe it to bridge scenes. No joke – Phoenix does quite a bit of improvisational dancing in Joker. Phillips and Scott Silver’s script give Phoenix very little to do other than riff on a psychological tick for two hours.

Arthur Fleck is a mental illness cliche. Abused, medicated and neurotic. There is no arc for Fleck. Fleck lurches from one unfortunate circumstance to another. There’s no growth, no descent into madness – just an already poor, disturbed, delusional Arthur. We are never given any reason to empathize with Fleck. An excellent counterpoint to this character is another Phoenix played, Theodore Twombly in Spike Jonze’s superior Her (2013). Twombly is equally marginalized like Fleck, but Jonze and Phoenix give us little glimpses of the character’s humanity in the midst of his existential horror. We never get those in Joker. We, like Arthur, receive unsatisfactory reveals with epic portent and paltry emotional punch.

Joker also lacks unifying tonal elements. Phillips can’t seem to decide if Joker is a moody, introspective independent character study or if it wants to wax epic. A solo cello pervades throughout the score, but at key moments Hildur Guðnadóttir seems to dial it up to full Zimmer. The production design is as anachronistic and as disjointed as the score. Everything feels dressed up, the elements are there but the mise-en-scène is missing. This world is too much our own. Joker is one of those rare pictures where the sum of its parts don’t equal the whole. I couldn’t help but think, why wasn’t it shot on film stock using vintage lenses? Though there is not much CGI, Joker is very crisp, very digital and that works against it.

One thing that does work is the vintage music. One can imagine the creative possibilities of what wanted to be a lyrical, musical picture edited around classic songs. That was a glaringly missed opportunity.

Zazie Beetz is all but an afterthought in this picture, a wasted talent and a virtual plot device.

Phillips’ Coup de Gras in this disjointed ramble through mental illness mythology is an equally disjointed monologue at the end. I’ll not spoil it, but it’s a cheap, self conscious, point blank expository shot at society. There’s no teeth to it, it’s not menacing at all. It’s banal and abrupt. For those that wish or worry that this film will be the Anarchist, Alt-Right or Incel manifesto … don’t. This film just isn’t that smart or that creative. There’s a denouement, but there’s not much to it other than cinematic padding.

If you pay close attention, you’ll see little homages to The King of Comedy, The Dark Knight, Psycho and Network. They’re not egregiously plagiaristic, just flair for the sake of flair. The Era of Easter Eggs needs to end.

On the up side, the 20 minutes of trailers prior to Joker was exciting. A breath of fresh, serious cinematic air after a long hot Summer of Spandex.

On a scale of 5, I give Joker a 2.75 and charitably round it up to 3.

I’d wait for a $2.99 Amazon Prime rental for this one, folks. Hell, maybe just wait for Netflix.

As old blue eyed Sinatra said, That’s Life.… Expand

2 of 11 users found this helpful29

All this user's reviews

6

AashiqOct 5, 2019

Every aspect of the movie seems to be working well only when looked at individually.

2 of 16 users found this helpful214

All this user's reviews

6

Chrisjohnson01Oct 7, 2019

While the performances, music and the overall shot composition are pretty great, The script really holds the film back. There are so many moments where the film makes massive leaps in logic that made me feel more confused and frustrated thenWhile the performances, music and the overall shot composition are pretty great, The script really holds the film back. There are so many moments where the film makes massive leaps in logic that made me feel more confused and frustrated then enthralled in the narrative. Arthur's motives are defined in the loosest possible terms and do not match what the end of the film is trying to say about this version of Gotham. I would recommend that you go and see it for yourself, but if all you have is a slight interest in the film, you may be able to just wait until it releases on blu ray… Expand

1 of 7 users found this helpful16

All this user's reviews

6

GeziOct 7, 2019

Good stand alone film but as an origin story for one of the most diabolical villain minds ever, it lacks.

It is well done but repetitive. There is a minor arch in the character but mostly it is the story of a suicidal smoker

1 of 7 users found this helpful16

All this user's reviews

6

Endo21Oct 8, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Although Joker leaves you wanting more at the end of the film, it also fails to keep you on the edge of your seat during the majority of it. Like a boxer who ends his rounds swinging hard during the last 30 seconds to gain favor in the judge's eyes. Joaquin does a great job interpreting the Joker when he finally gets to. However during most of the film rather than disturbed I only felt sorry for a man who, do to childhood trauma, let everyone walk all over him. The slightest rejection from anyone would trigger his hysteria. Surprisingly, they didn't add a scene where he buys an ice cream cone and as he gets his first taste the scoop completely falls and he has a panic attack. Hanging by a thread, thanks to his medication. When fundings for it are cut off and after finding out the truth about his mother. The Joker is born 90 mins into the movie. I sat thru it. At the theater I attended, I witness about 6-10 people leaving during the fist hour. When it was over an individual clapped, four about 8 seconds, when no one follow he stopped. Wasn't the worst movie I ever saw but definitely not a masterpiece.… Expand

4 of 13 users found this helpful49

All this user's reviews

6

JamesCollierOct 15, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. An interesting film to think about and worth watching for the cultural factor alone. We know that Arthur Fleck (Joaquin Phoenix) is the Joker and this is his origin film so I won't talk about the outline of the plot in chronological order. The club scenes where he is laughing at the wrong times and he cannot tell his own jokes later on for his uncontrollable laughter are some of the most compelling scenes in the film. The production values were all good as you would expect from a big studio picture. I liked the approach of making the film darker and grittier than your standard comic book movie, you really felt as if Gotham was this volcanic cesspit ready to erupt. The buildup of the revolution with the talk of garbage everywhere and the government closing Arthur's program down and cutting his medication, his 'crazy' mother Penny Fleck (Frances Conroy), this makes the altercation on the train where he kills the guys all the more understandable and real. Thomas Wayne (Brett Cullen) calling the lower class clowns, I can see an outcry but this definitely felt overblown for me with how they then viewed the subway killings and this clown figure which is Arthur as some messiah for them to follow and rebel against the upper class. I did like how Thomas Wayne appeared less like this benevolent god as he is always seemingly portrayed though.

However, the film felt very predictable and soulless for me. I didn't believe that Arthur and Thomas Wayne were related because his mother was obviously mentally disturbed and Frances Conroy is the stereotypical unstable or strange woman (Six Feet Under' and 'American Horror Story'). There was every chance they were related however with the inscription on the back of the photo of Penny by "T.W", either way the question becomes irrelavant because we know Arthur is an unreliable narrator and his path has been set because it is a film about the Joker's origins so it had to be this way. The worst parts of the movie were with Sophie Dumond (Zazie Beetz) but not because of her perfromance, she performed as well as anyone in the film, it was a solid ensemble performance but she was let down with a poor screenplay as were the rest of the cast. They showed Arthur was delusional before his encounters with Sophie and you are expected to believe they embrace in her doorway and after his laughing fit at the comedy club, she is seen a short while after laughing with him? It was far too obvious. but it is meant to be a big revelation that he imagined it, of course he did, he is a creep.

The biggest thing for me is I felt as if I was watching some 'Taxi Driver'-'The King of Comedy' mish mash to the point where it was not its own film for me. I thought the whole time that I would rather be watching those films and whilst I largely liked the final act, it was again so obvious that Arthur was going to kill Murray Franklin (Robert De Niro) to the point where I lost interest almost completely and I was not overwhelmed by some euphoric cinematic cruscendo of a moment when it happened, because it was typical. Arthur gets his chaos anyway and it is a decent character arc, they should have ended the film with the scene before Arthur is running around the corridors because where Arthur says something along the lines of "You wouldn't get it" in the room with the woman and then the song comes on, that was the perfect time to end it, that was very good. I had mixed feelings on showing Bruce Wayne's (Dante Pereira-Olson) parents being killed, simply because I have seen it so many times but I guess it was an alright idea to connect it to Arthur's character arc. I don't think Joker needed an origin film and this should be a mystery aka 'The Dark Knight', this is not to say I went into the film with an automatic disliking for the film because the film did have its merits and I love to keep an open mind to every film obviously, I just did not see the point of this film before going in and I largely feel the same after seeing the film. 'Logan' did for me what this film could not, a dark comic book film that felt like it was its own thing. I do not think I could give it more than a six being truthful, it does not resonate with me but its foundations are solid. I would forget the hype it has got but I would also especially forget the people criticising the violence. There are more violent films that have been made and that will be made, it is 2019 and we do not need the incessant attempts by people in the media industry who are saying that forms of media, e.g. Video Games, Films, TV shows, Podcasts and so on are directly responsible for every violent or illegal act committed. The evidence proves it is quite the contrary and it is a minority of already disturbed individuals in most cases.… Expand

5 of 11 users found this helpful56

All this user's reviews

6

peanutbutterwohOct 29, 2019

A fantastic performance by Joaquin Phoenix, the violence is impactful and surprising. The movie stumbles with some awkward flashback sequences, and the ending is very messy, with a DC universe reference that feels forced. A wanna be TaxiA fantastic performance by Joaquin Phoenix, the violence is impactful and surprising. The movie stumbles with some awkward flashback sequences, and the ending is very messy, with a DC universe reference that feels forced. A wanna be Taxi Driver homage.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

6

i_m_a_blowfishNov 9, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. The brilliant acting must be appreciated but other than that its plain and simple. There is very stupid humor somewhere in film which is disgusting to see. I like lighting in all the scenes but theres not much visual story telling. The worst thing is that they have adapted some scenes from brilliant movies but a whole damn scene from modern times is used as it is in a movie theater.… Expand

1 of 3 users found this helpful12

All this user's reviews

6

PerikolizMoviesNov 23, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I loved the performance. It was an amazing acting by Phoenix . But the character was exposing so much of his feelings by dancing that got me tired. I had the expectation to watch the most amazing movie of all time and i didnt . It was a nice popcorn movie but nothing more… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

DMLYxCriticDec 29, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I do get why people love this movie. Simple: Joaquin Phoenix’ performance. True, he may have given one of the best, if not, the best performance of his career, I simply cannot stand the vapidity of this film. What’s the point? Sure, this is about mental illness, but what about the other aspects? The “kill the rich” arch the film seems to be bandying about? That is beside the point, I guess. If this film solely focused on the mental aspect, I would have given it a higher score. It got too muddled up that the second act was a boring drag of useless scenes showing the character’s descent into madness.… Expand

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

6

Dcuniverse101Feb 19, 2020

Phoenix’s performance is amazing and the score is absolutely fantastic. However the blueprint and elements from films such as king of comedy and taxi driver feel a bit too similar.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

Sosmooth1982Jul 6, 2023

Really crazy dramatized movie. Slowly watching him go crazy. Pretty shocking ending and I wasn't expecting it.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

pijgogoJul 24, 2020

Good movie if like The Dark Knight, Batman or Joaquin Phoenix. One of the best versions of Joker that gives answers as to why he is insane. Feels new and revealing, whereas versions before Heath Ledger were merely madmen with lessGood movie if like The Dark Knight, Batman or Joaquin Phoenix. One of the best versions of Joker that gives answers as to why he is insane. Feels new and revealing, whereas versions before Heath Ledger were merely madmen with less explanation and depth. In the end though, you have to extrapolate to find meaning. The plot provides social unrest, circumstances, and a Joker without aligning them with specific political views or ideology.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

6

Willywonka180Apr 10, 2021

While Joker has some great points. It fails overall. The depiction of mental health is phenomenal first of all, I have no faults with that part of the film. But the story is messy and I found myself confused way too much. Although I see whyWhile Joker has some great points. It fails overall. The depiction of mental health is phenomenal first of all, I have no faults with that part of the film. But the story is messy and I found myself confused way too much. Although I see why people like it I just couldn't bring myself to say it is good. It isn't awful though, and I agree with some of the Oscars it got nominated for. The acting cannot go unseen. The editing is great. But the story is just so messy man! But if you like drama/thrillers I guess you could enjoy it.… Expand

2 of 3 users found this helpful21

All this user's reviews

6

rideawaveDec 7, 2020

I think people like this movie more because they love the Joker character. As a movie, it's average at best. It's a little too broad and basic for my tastes but the final act picks it up a bit. I don't think it's a great movie but there areI think people like this movie more because they love the Joker character. As a movie, it's average at best. It's a little too broad and basic for my tastes but the final act picks it up a bit. I don't think it's a great movie but there are some good scenes.… Expand

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

6

guffreyDec 28, 2020

This movie’s plot is confused and doesn’t have the same oomph I think the director intended it to have. Joaquin absolutely carries this film with his portrayal of the Joker.

2 of 4 users found this helpful22

All this user's reviews

6

ColincNov 6, 2020

The true art of lighting, music & acting brings up the perfect theme; However ruined by the lack of a acceptable story.

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

6

PhoenixReveiwsMar 30, 2021

I liked this movie, but I didn't love it. I cant really explain it but I know anyone under 15 shouldn't even take a glance at this movie. As it's easily the darkest movie I've ever seen.

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

6

DarkwingSchmuckMar 3, 2022

Joaquin Phoenix elevates an underwritten character with a strong showcase performance in this surprisingly hollow and toothless film. Joker works neither as a character study of a sociopath, nor as an adaptation of the classic Batman arch-nemesis.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

5

fbnaulinOct 4, 2019

Great background for the character to develope, sadly, director and writers didn't know what to do when the story needed to keep going. Every scene and dialog in the second half makes you feel idiot or ashamed, due to its simplicity, idiocy,Great background for the character to develope, sadly, director and writers didn't know what to do when the story needed to keep going. Every scene and dialog in the second half makes you feel idiot or ashamed, due to its simplicity, idiocy, and unbelief. Flashback sequences are the worst offender.… Expand

0 of 19 users found this helpful019

All this user's reviews

5

LordoftheDanceOct 9, 2019

It is not an "enjoyable" movie, other than a few very dark jokes.... But it is very well done, Phoenix brings it; amazing acting. The movie really makes you think in many ways, and certainly keeps you on the edge of your seat.

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

5

katezoeOct 12, 2019

Worth seeing because of the performance by Joaquin Phoenix who will get an Oscar nomination. Movie about a what makes a psychopath....been done before and nothing new is revealed.

3 of 15 users found this helpful312

All this user's reviews

5

RealMuthaFJan 2, 2020

As expected, Joker is not the masterpiece everyone makes it out to be.

The first 3/4ths of the movie is a generic tear-squeezing sob story about a socially awkward guy who is constantly abused by right about anyone (seriously, he gets beatenAs expected, Joker is not the masterpiece everyone makes it out to be.

The first 3/4ths of the movie is a generic tear-squeezing sob story about a socially awkward guy who is constantly abused by right about anyone (seriously, he gets beaten up by randoms twice within the first hour or so), and eventually snaps into violence. Up until the final half an hour I leaned towards a 2-3/10, but it finally managed to produce some tense, if predictable scenes. Funnily enough, the movie got better when the titular character started resembling more of its classic version, while all the "bold reimagining" only managed to produce an unlikeable and unrelatable loser.

From the technical standpoint, Joker looks slick with pretty good cinematography. As for acting, Phoenix grimaces too hard here, and I was overall left unimpressed. Have to give credit for the severe weight loss he underwent for the role, though. The music, while mostly fitting, sometimes also adds to the already overly-forced sobbing atmosphere with the least subtle violin ever played. The handful of Batman references here are largely unnecessary for the plot and only work to sell the movie to the broader audience, which, as we all know, worked out pretty well.

All in all, Joker tries to be pretentious, artsy and deep, but is only capable to churn out an outplayed moral that our society is toxic and violent, an overacting Phoenix and a few bloody scenes to look more edgy. Forgettable and overrated, although I expected nothing more.… Expand

3 of 7 users found this helpful34

All this user's reviews

5

dredstimpsonOct 12, 2019

DON'T believe the hype. (by the way, nice job on marketing "people are walking out on this movie" - I KNOW why and if your're thinking it's because it's BORING, you would be right)
I honestly don't understand how some people can rate thisDON'T believe the hype. (by the way, nice job on marketing "people are walking out on this movie" - I KNOW why and if your're thinking it's because it's BORING, you would be right)
I honestly don't understand how some people can rate this movie a 10. (Even Goodfellas is not a 10, and I LOVE!!!! Goodfellas) Are they robo-reviews or from people who have never seen a movie before in their life and are just awestruck at the marvels of the cinema? I would have given this a 1 just to try to add balance, but 5 seems adequate. Here's why: Would I ever watch this movie movie again? short answer, NO; long answer NO.
Was it terrible, no, was it watchable, as a family drama, barely (not a big fan of family dramas)
Anyway, not a 10. Jacqueline Phoenix, Az. does a nice job at playing a tormented/delusional person. Cinematography was great, but that does not in itself make for a great movie. ( I can't really recall a set piece that stands out except for the ling stairs in the promo photo)… Expand

5 of 20 users found this helpful515

All this user's reviews

5

ExemplisOct 10, 2019

Cinematography is superb, but this is not the Joker. Instead of a Nietzschean Superhuman, the destroyer of morality, the angel of chaos we get a pathetic sick loser getting wrecked by ordinary surcumstances. Wasted acting potential.

7 of 21 users found this helpful714

All this user's reviews

5

AmirhosseinghOct 6, 2019

My Biggest Problem with this is that this is not faithful to its source.its just uising a popular comicbook character name to guarantee its sell.you joker is not a crazy man who is the nemesis if batman in this movie.its just victim that youMy Biggest Problem with this is that this is not faithful to its source.its just uising a popular comicbook character name to guarantee its sell.you joker is not a crazy man who is the nemesis if batman in this movie.its just victim that you can be sympathic to him.however,plot twist in this movie is unacceptable for Comic fans.I dont why joker fanboys are like that.its fan score is more than The Dark Kight now!!!!… Expand

2 of 16 users found this helpful214

All this user's reviews

5

JP32Mar 25, 2020

Just be a comic book movie. If you want to be serious, take your cues from The Killing Joke, not Taxi Driver.

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

5

actiniumApr 12, 2020

/ .

1 of 4 users found this helpful13

All this user's reviews

5

DominArsenOct 27, 2019

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. A particular film because it is an author film sold as a blockbuster under 17 years old. The plans are slow, working just like the light and the angle of approach not to mention the environments and the different places. This is the story of a character coming to embrace the madness of the world to make something of coloring red. The film is particularly good for his illness and is done in a rigorous way. Nothing has the area to be left to chance .. But I do not find this film excellent. It fits like a very good anti-hero movie such as we rarely see today alongside super-hero movies breaking the box office. The success of this joker can be because it fits in a time when the forbidden becomes allowed -17Ans, but especially that compare to what can do Marvel or DC; tries a sneakier and cinematic approach. Finally it may be the only movie that shows the cinema that we could see people fan of superheroes. That says a lot about our time. Thank you

Un film particulier, car c'est un film d'auteur vendu comme un blockbuster moins de 17ans. Les plans sont lents, travailler tout comme la lumière et l'angle d'approche sans compter les environnements et les différents lieux. C'est l'histoire d'un personnage venant embrasser la folie du monde pour en faire quelque chose de colorier en rouge. Le film rend particulièrement bien sa maladie et le fait surtout de manière rigoureuse est prolongé. Rien n'a l'aire d'être laissée au hasard.. Pourtant je ne trouve pas ce film excellent. Il s'insère comme un très bon film d'antihéros tel qu'on en voit rarement aujourd'hui à côté des films de super héros qui casse le box-office. Le succès de ce joker vient peux être du fait qu'il s'insère dans une époque ou l'interdit devient permis #-17Ans, mais surtout que comparer à ce que peux faire Marvel ou DC; tente une approche plus sournoise et cinématographique. Finalement c'est peux être le seul film qui montre ce qu'est le cinéma qu'on pu voir les gens fan de super héros. Cela en dit long sur notre époque. Merci accompagnatrice… Expand

1 of 7 users found this helpful16

All this user's reviews

5

bacchus_playsNov 11, 2019

Get's a 10 from me for the cinematography and the hilarious miniature golf joke (you'll know what I mean when ya see it) Phoenix does a terrific job but in the end it's another comic book movie. Bruce Wayne gets mentioned and my eyes roll.Get's a 10 from me for the cinematography and the hilarious miniature golf joke (you'll know what I mean when ya see it) Phoenix does a terrific job but in the end it's another comic book movie. Bruce Wayne gets mentioned and my eyes roll. Should have been about a guy who embraces his inner clown after losing his job. Would have been more interesting because as it stands it feels like it sticks to the source material for the Joker and as a result I lost interest. The early parts of the movie are definitely the best. It sort of hovers between Taxi Driver and Batman. Can't decide whether it wants to be a serious movie or a comic book movie.… Expand

4 of 7 users found this helpful43

All this user's reviews

Joker

User Reviews