Inside Man
Universal Pictures | Release Date: March 24, 2006
7.3
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 356 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
272
Mixed:
60
Negative:
24
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
3
DanielJ.Apr 13, 2006
This is hack work. I was a fan of Lee's even when the buzz around him died. And I love all the major actors in this movie. But I thought it was one of the clumsiest movies I've seen in a long time. No energy, momentum, style. The This is hack work. I was a fan of Lee's even when the buzz around him died. And I love all the major actors in this movie. But I thought it was one of the clumsiest movies I've seen in a long time. No energy, momentum, style. The script was anemic and corny. I'm not sure how this film was supposed to translate. As suspense it failed because it telegraphs everything in advance. It has a distracting sublot with a nazi sympathizer that is based on an ubelievable premise. It also has too many A-list actors like Jodie Foster and Christopher Plummer doing small parts that are little to work with and that is something I always find distracting. I'm not trying to be a hater, but I really disliked this movie and am taking the time to write this because I disliked it so much.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful
0
WillieG.Aug 9, 2006
This is truly one of the worst films I've ever seen. On several occasions, this mess was nothing more than thinly veiled racial jabs masquerading as a crime thriller that goes nowhere. We see Spike's usual M.O. on display This is truly one of the worst films I've ever seen. On several occasions, this mess was nothing more than thinly veiled racial jabs masquerading as a crime thriller that goes nowhere. We see Spike's usual M.O. on display throughout the film, which basically amounts to making caucasians feel guilty about...well being caucasians. Spike Lee was in way over his head on this one. Case in point...Lee is the only dolt transparent enough to cast Jodie Foster as a manipulative power broker (who's white of course since white=manipulative in Spike Lee joints) then proceed to name the character Ms. White. Even the overt racial sarcasm falls flat as his breathless pursuit of half cocked social commentary drags this sophomoric production down to the abyss of most forgettable films of all time.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
3
DWillyMar 30, 2006
Pretty terrible, really. The masterful Denzel, even more so than with "Man On Fire," is swimming upstream here and Clive Owen better think of a way to add some vulnerability to his hardass act soon because it's wearing thin. There is Pretty terrible, really. The masterful Denzel, even more so than with "Man On Fire," is swimming upstream here and Clive Owen better think of a way to add some vulnerability to his hardass act soon because it's wearing thin. There is some really painful dialog as our heros dissassociate from the grave danger threatoning fifty human lives, and, while Spike himself doesn't appear, there is scene after scene featuring talentless people demonstrating his acting technique of very nearly winking directly into the camera.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
1
BlisterfishCafeAug 7, 2006
Here we have the second worst film I have ever seen. This DVD should come with a packet of "eye bleach". Boorish from it's inception, this film quietly reminds you why Hollywood is dead. I gave it a "one" because Ms. Foster's knees Here we have the second worst film I have ever seen. This DVD should come with a packet of "eye bleach". Boorish from it's inception, this film quietly reminds you why Hollywood is dead. I gave it a "one" because Ms. Foster's knees look like tadpoles in the gullet of a large pelican.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
3
BayLeafSep 9, 2006
A silly and limp "thriller" by an otherwise intelligent director. There were laughs in all the wrong places.
1 of 1 users found this helpful
6
[Anonymous]Apr 12, 2006
No one can deny that this movie has a great cast. The acting is terrific. The directing is classic Spike Lee--brilliant at times, but he takes every chance to work in commentary about race, religion and ethnicity. All in all, this movie No one can deny that this movie has a great cast. The acting is terrific. The directing is classic Spike Lee--brilliant at times, but he takes every chance to work in commentary about race, religion and ethnicity. All in all, this movie presents a good picture and the plot depicts what would be a brilliant heist if it were true. However, there are serious flaws in the plot (which are gracefully glossed over by expert acting), but the end result is that we really don't know the various character's motivations for their behavior. At one point we are told by one of the theives "I did it for the money", but that doesn't seem to add up with what was taken. Similarly I'm still trying to figure out exactly what motivated Denzel to bring Jodie a telephone number in one of the last scenes. The sequence of the movie is expertly executed to both provide hints and keep you guessing. Denzel's character is likeable, funny and feels real. Jodie Foster's character is a bit unbelievable in terms of profession. Oh, and keep an eye out for the Albanian woman. I thought she was excellent.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
3
FrankD.Apr 18, 2006
Due to the generally positive response to this film, I asumed I would like it. Wrong!!! Sorely lacking in style, this potboiler is all over the place! The writing of Denzel Washington's character is often ridiculous; and he works Due to the generally positive response to this film, I asumed I would like it. Wrong!!! Sorely lacking in style, this potboiler is all over the place! The writing of Denzel Washington's character is often ridiculous; and he works valiently to overcome it. The only real entertainment value for me were the unintential (I assume) moments of camp; notably, the telephone scene between Denzel and his girlfriend; and the bizarre performance from Jodie Foster, who seems to be trying to channel Ann Coulter! Foster's attempts at being cool and cunning come off as simply laughable. I'm not sure how Christopher Plummer kept a straight face in his scenes with her. For me, only Foster's performance fiasco made this film worth my viewing time. And why was Willem Dafoe's participation needed here? I used to believe Spike was good film director, but a poor screenwriter. After seeing "Inside Man." I now have my doubts about his skills as a director. I think most of the "names" signed on for the money.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
3
EricY.Jul 31, 2006
you think the movie is clever, but its not, there's way better movie out there than is one, and please, don't take your girlfriend to a movie like this one.
1 of 1 users found this helpful
1
JohnB.Aug 10, 2006
The worst thing about Inside Man is not that it is such a terrible film, (which it is) but that it received such good reviews. What's the deal? Are the critics just so used to lousy movies that they give a bomb like this good marks? The worst thing about Inside Man is not that it is such a terrible film, (which it is) but that it received such good reviews. What's the deal? Are the critics just so used to lousy movies that they give a bomb like this good marks? This is a really bad script, poorly acted (what is up with Jodie Foster?-i've seen better acting at my kid's school play), and poorly directed by Spike Lee-who hasen't made a good film since-maybe never. Boring, stupid and a waste of time!… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
1
OrsonDec 21, 2006
Of all the films of 2006, the largely favorable critical reception of this one is truly the most baffling. It actually manged to make at least one film critic's 10 Best List!!!! Slick? Yes. Good? Absolutely not! The only reason I give Of all the films of 2006, the largely favorable critical reception of this one is truly the most baffling. It actually manged to make at least one film critic's 10 Best List!!!! Slick? Yes. Good? Absolutely not! The only reason I give this film "1" point is for the highly-entertaining, unintentionally laughable performance by Jodie Foster -- she's so awful in her seething intensity, that she's wonderful! Foster's megacorporate red-herring heavy-breathing was the only aspect of the film that kept me interested -- just to see what she would do next... The whole enterprise is slick garbage! I'm sure they all enjoyed cashing their checks when the project was finished.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
2
JeremyK.Mar 26, 2006
The best part of this movie is the trailer you see on tv.. looks great.. till you get there and the two hours of your life is over. Boring not enough action.. Jody Foster has lost her acting abilities. I wanted to not the fack smile off her The best part of this movie is the trailer you see on tv.. looks great.. till you get there and the two hours of your life is over. Boring not enough action.. Jody Foster has lost her acting abilities. I wanted to not the fack smile off her face.. But i dont hit woman.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
2
SteveO.Mar 26, 2006
I agree that the best part of this movie is the trailer on TV. Unnecessary social commentary inserted into useless waste of time scenes (at one point, denzel instructs a low level patrolman not to use ethnic slurs and the bank robber owen I agree that the best part of this movie is the trailer on TV. Unnecessary social commentary inserted into useless waste of time scenes (at one point, denzel instructs a low level patrolman not to use ethnic slurs and the bank robber owen tries to steer a child away from playing a violent video game, lame for a supposed heist movie) jodie foster's character was useless and the acting belonged in "mean girls". If you're looking for a plot with standard rising action/climax/falling action don't expect any from this film. Yes I understand the ending but that doesn't mean that it was clever or interesting. Over half of the theater waited throughout the entire ending credits with a desperate hope that they would eventually get there money's worth and a portion of the plot would be seen to completion. no such luck. Loose ends are everywhere from the role of clive owen's fellow bank robbers to how the robbers got all of their information to how they were at all connected to Case. Although Denzel's observation that "this ain't no bank robbery" is correct, I was disappointed with the "deep" and "complex" conspiracy that for some reason involved the mayor of new york, although his character seemed unaware of even his own role halfway through the movie… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
0
JoshC.Sep 17, 2007
Lee, for one, is long beyond his days as a civic provocateur and voice for the radical social world. Like John Singleton, he may have found his legs as a pulp manufacturer whose least arguable claim to fame is that he can do fast, funny, Lee, for one, is long beyond his days as a civic provocateur and voice for the radical social world. Like John Singleton, he may have found his legs as a pulp manufacturer whose least arguable claim to fame is that he can do fast, funny, attitudinal genre films better than Tony Scott. Washington and Foster, for their parts, are merely dukes in a sick kingdom, taking what roles they're offered for people their age (and sex) just to keep their careers afloat in the public brain-pan. Lee is playing the genre like a board game, and his film is a sniggering riff, filled with hyperbolic New York stereotypes, sexist jokes, puns, scattershot commentary on racial profiling and smug banter. As bogus in its way as Richard Donner's 16 Blocks, Inside Man has an even more irritating disrespect for the verities of police work and for the emotional life of urban Americans. There are a few rousing achievements on the table, in particular a comical police debate--instigated by a faux riddle tossed by Owen, about trains, U.S. currency and Grand Central Station--as well as a fast joke involving a Sikh hostage who, outraged by profiling, acknowledges that yes, he can easily hail a cab in Mid-Eastern-cabbie-saturated New York. But heist films are hardly what they used to be; for decades, they were a vehicle for postwar desperation and fatalism, and today the genre has an empty tank of frisson to offer without film noir's acknowledgment of doom. The difference between, say, Stanley Kubrick's 1956 masterpiece The Killing and contemporary daydreams like Inside Man is the difference between a luckless hell on earth and a dull weekend in the Poconos.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful
7
grandpajoe6191Oct 3, 2011
Too much Characters are introduced and ignored in the movie, but nevertheless "Inside Man" is a powerful heist movie full of ready-tension.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
0
SirShelbyMar 26, 2006
This movie is an insult to intelligent movie making in every imaginable sense. The story is flat out lame, with the super "surprise" ending being nothing more than a tired joke. Now it seems that everyone from critics to casual movie goers This movie is an insult to intelligent movie making in every imaginable sense. The story is flat out lame, with the super "surprise" ending being nothing more than a tired joke. Now it seems that everyone from critics to casual movie goers have been willing to excuse this movie solely based on the great cast. Which would have been understandable, had the acting itself not been the greatest weakness of this pretentious mess. Washington gives one of the worst performances of his career here, playing a sarcastic know-it-all cop who is annoyingly juvenile and devoid of any compelling thoughts or emotions.i.e., he and his partner stare at a female victim's large chest while interogating her, making light of her emotions. (this is supposed to be funny) Foster is also terrible playing a mysterious liason with her own agenda. Dafoe is miscast as a clueless police captain. Owen is the only exception here, suffering through an under-developed role. The movie is ruined by random attempts at comedy, both intentional and unintentional, which ruins any suspense or tension that might have helped it. THE BOTTOM LINE: A pretentious hollywood film that trys to pass itself off as an updated Dog Day Afternoon, but instead feels more like a failed comedy with an A-list cast.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful
10
Zak21Jul 7, 2014
Inside Man was an action packed, tense and suspense filled, and overall exciting movie. This movie is going into my book as my favorite movie. The actors were absolutely amazing and they fit their part.

If I had to watch a movieInside Man was an action packed, tense and suspense filled, and overall exciting movie. This movie is going into my book as my favorite movie. The actors were absolutely amazing and they fit their part.

If I had to watch a movie over-and-over again, this would be it. It is filled with energy and is absolutely incredible. The soundtrack was amazing and fit well in the movie. The actors were well placed, and were great at their job.

Clive Owen's ego and personality really fits the character "Dalton Russel" as explained. Denzel Washington also did a fantastic job of "Detective Keith Frazier." Overall the actors of this movie really had a place and knew what they were doing.

If you are looking for an action-packed, somewhat comedic, and suspense-filled movie, you should really check out "Inside Man." Spike Lee has outdone himself on this one, as it is a well put together film that is sure to please you. It is rated 'R' so be careful who watches it. Overall great movie.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
9
MrBlackTronJul 28, 2014
Mükemmel kurgulanmış benzerlerinden oldukça farklı çok değişik bir tat veren olağanüstü oyuncu kadrosuyla ve yönetmen spike lee eşliğinde daha önce neden izlemediğimi düşündürten film. Kesinlikle klasikler arasında yerini alacaktır mutlakaMükemmel kurgulanmış benzerlerinden oldukça farklı çok değişik bir tat veren olağanüstü oyuncu kadrosuyla ve yönetmen spike lee eşliğinde daha önce neden izlemediğimi düşündürten film. Kesinlikle klasikler arasında yerini alacaktır mutlaka izlenmeli...… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
JPKJul 8, 2019
Very Unique
Inside Man is a thriller that has the terrific talents of it’s cast.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
DavidA.Apr 2, 2006
This movie is almost flawless, its not the classic American movie where the good guy beats the bad guy, in here there's no bad guy, everybody is just trying to make it. The ending is awsome, and helps u comprehend the whole movie. There This movie is almost flawless, its not the classic American movie where the good guy beats the bad guy, in here there's no bad guy, everybody is just trying to make it. The ending is awsome, and helps u comprehend the whole movie. There hasn't been a better thriller since the sixth sense.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
WalkenM.Mar 27, 2006
Though certainly Lee's most mainstream film to date, Inside Man is much more political than most critics are giving it credit for. Ultimately, Lee reveals detective and bank robber as dual protagonists, fighting corporate and government Though certainly Lee's most mainstream film to date, Inside Man is much more political than most critics are giving it credit for. Ultimately, Lee reveals detective and bank robber as dual protagonists, fighting corporate and government systems that reward corruption, injustice, and opportunism at every step. Between this, V for Vendetta, and Dave Chappelle's Block Party, I'm feeling revolutionary. Down with the white majority!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
LauraW.Mar 30, 2006
Thought it was great!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
PanayiotisS.Apr 3, 2006
Clever and entertaining. It seems as Mr. Lee wanted to show the world he could make a good "normal" film and he did it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
MikeG.Apr 7, 2006
A movie where the whole didn't add up to the sum of its parts. Solid if not spectacular performances by Denzel, Jodie and Clive, decent enough pacing, but there was something missing. The story was VERY anticlimactic...the twist with A movie where the whole didn't add up to the sum of its parts. Solid if not spectacular performances by Denzel, Jodie and Clive, decent enough pacing, but there was something missing. The story was VERY anticlimactic...the twist with Christopher Plummer was revealed very early, and movies like this are more effective when they end with a bang than a whimper. It was so-so...I wouldn't recommend it.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
DougR.Apr 9, 2006
The writer and producer think they are so clever, but the basic plot is ridiculous. Spike Lee makes it interesting with various directing techniques. The last 15 mnutes is a big letdown. Lucky Sleven does this type of movie much better.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JeffS.May 18, 2006
One of the best caper flicks in years. Only The Score comes to mind among recent ones as being anywhere near as good.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
DanaM.May 4, 2006
No it's not perfect, but it sure is entertaining. And thats all that counts isn't it?
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
CraigA.Jun 2, 2006
This is just great. An entertaining heist movie with (thanks to being directed by Spike Lee) a social conscience. The best bits being the portrayals of everyday predjudice and the dangers inherent in a generation growing up playing This is just great. An entertaining heist movie with (thanks to being directed by Spike Lee) a social conscience. The best bits being the portrayals of everyday predjudice and the dangers inherent in a generation growing up playing 'harmless' videogames.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
DanB.Aug 13, 2006
Go with the critics on this one. Excellent movie! Spike Lee is consumate film maker. He pays attention to the details. Easy to understand why artists perform for him. I compare this one to Usual Suspects which Roger Ebert gave a 38 rating in 1995.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
AndrewT.Aug 24, 2006
Taut, compelling thriller; it kept me on the edge ot my seat and wanting more throughout. This is the best movie I have seen this year. Nonetheless the movie had a few weaknesses: the characters lacked depth and I found the ending a little Taut, compelling thriller; it kept me on the edge ot my seat and wanting more throughout. This is the best movie I have seen this year. Nonetheless the movie had a few weaknesses: the characters lacked depth and I found the ending a little weak, but these are really nitpicks. An excellent movie. Strongly recommended.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
TheDudeSep 11, 2006
This film can be summarized in five words: "All flash and no substance." The lead actors deliver solid performances (as you would expect from the likes of Denzel Washington, Jodie Foster, and Christopher Plummer) but are unfortunately This film can be summarized in five words: "All flash and no substance." The lead actors deliver solid performances (as you would expect from the likes of Denzel Washington, Jodie Foster, and Christopher Plummer) but are unfortunately expected to carry a largely incomprehensible story where the plot is vague and convoluted and the motivations of the characters are poorly defined. Top it all off with a resolution that leaves more questions than answers and you have a film that is hard to recommend. To Spike Lee's credit, he can be confident and inventive director, but he still goes for "film student gimmickry" when the film would have been better served with more restraint and a tighter focus on the narrative. "Inside Man" is entertaining enough as a popcorn flick, but there are better films more deserving of your time.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
AdamR.Mar 25, 2006
Very slick indeed, all actors are playing to strengths here and it shows. Great dialogue brings alive a tried formula.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
RHMar 25, 2006
If the ending were as good as the rest of the movie I would have given it a 10. Most of the way through the movie was great... good plot, good acting... then it ends, and leaves you feeling "what happened." Four of us went together and none If the ending were as good as the rest of the movie I would have given it a 10. Most of the way through the movie was great... good plot, good acting... then it ends, and leaves you feeling "what happened." Four of us went together and none of us could figure out what happened at the end. Very frustrating!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
DanS.Mar 27, 2006
Entertaining and compelling to the end. Not a flawless film but a fun and engaging ride.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
J.D.Mar 29, 2006
Judging by the reviews on this site I was anticipating a good movie but I was dissapointed. It had its moments and had the right idea but went wrong in a lot of area's. Overall it was incredibley cheesey. But I expected that as soon as Judging by the reviews on this site I was anticipating a good movie but I was dissapointed. It had its moments and had the right idea but went wrong in a lot of area's. Overall it was incredibley cheesey. But I expected that as soon as I saw the opening credits and was reminded that it was A SPIKE LEE JOINT.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
AlisionH.Mar 30, 2006
Thought it was very well done. Excellent acting by Washington and Owen. Lots of action and a good story line. Great movie. Got to be good with Denzel Washington playing the lead. Excellent.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
JohnApr 1, 2006
I generally do not like Lee's movies, but this is an exception. The story keeps you on your feet and although I generally do not like Washington he was pretty good in this one. I only see about two or three movies a year and I'm I generally do not like Lee's movies, but this is an exception. The story keeps you on your feet and although I generally do not like Washington he was pretty good in this one. I only see about two or three movies a year and I'm happy this is one I did see.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
MatthewP.Apr 1, 2006
This movie is a must-see movie. It's not the best movie in the world for sure, or even close to that, but it's a movie everyone should see in the big screen.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
RobApr 15, 2006
It resembles "The Usual Suspects" in many ways, although the cast definitely has more star power. My expectations were met; I was entertained, I was surprised, and I laughed. This is the one and only Spike Lee film I've ever liked.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
MarkC.Apr 15, 2006
I am a big fan of Spike Lee, and think a lot of his other moveies have been very underrated. So I saw this with high expectations and was quite disappointed. The movie has little suspense, the plot is unbelievable, and some of the minor I am a big fan of Spike Lee, and think a lot of his other moveies have been very underrated. So I saw this with high expectations and was quite disappointed. The movie has little suspense, the plot is unbelievable, and some of the minor characters are so stereotypical, they are both unbelievable and distracting. The only really great performance in the movie was by Clive Owen, who is mesmerizing. The other main actors (Denzel Washington, Jodie Foster) are good, but have been better in other movies.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
FrancescoT.Apr 16, 2006
Beautiful.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
RandalApr 9, 2006
This is the PERFECT genre movie and has been completely underrated by almost everyone. I expected very little from this other than a competent heist movie and was completely overwhelmed by both the cleverness of the action and pacing, the This is the PERFECT genre movie and has been completely underrated by almost everyone. I expected very little from this other than a competent heist movie and was completely overwhelmed by both the cleverness of the action and pacing, the way that Spike Lee played with your expectations, and the taught character interplay. Everything about it was an unexpected pleasure. The only movies that this can really be compared to are the great French thrillers like Rififi or Les Diaboliques, which were made (like this) by great directors who fully respected the conventions and limitations of the genres they are working inside.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
TerryB.May 16, 2006
100% Satisfaction guaranteed! Highly recommended! Spike lee's best for years.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
M.AustinAug 14, 2006
I'm surprised at the number of negative comments posted on this movie. Although not perfect, this movie is certainly entertaining and is better put together than most junk you see on the screen these days.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
AlecB.Sep 18, 2006
I enjoyed watching this movie. A very surprising thriller.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
JaredC.Dec 4, 2007
Filmmaker Spike Lee's first foray into big-studio genre movies, Inside Man is a twisty thriller that makes up for its flaws with star power and sharp observations about post-2001 New York. It's about the volatile showdown between a Filmmaker Spike Lee's first foray into big-studio genre movies, Inside Man is a twisty thriller that makes up for its flaws with star power and sharp observations about post-2001 New York. It's about the volatile showdown between a determined cop and a perfectionist bank robber is sent spiraling toward disaster when a scheming power broker steps in to take control of the situation in this hair-raising heist flick directed by Spike Lee and starring Denzel Washington, Clive Owen, and Jodie Foster. Dalton Russell (Owen) is a bank robber with a difference. In his quest to execute the perfect heist, Dalton has taken every possible factor into consideration. Dalton's uncanny ability of staying one step ahead of the law thwarts even-tempered Detective Keith Frazier's (Washington) best efforts. But there's another factor at play. The bank president (Christopher Plummer) has requested the services of high-profile negotiator Madeline White (Foster). Despite her commendable track record, Madeline is something of a wild card, and before the day is over, this bank robbery will go down in history as one of the most elaborate heists ever executed. Inside Man's plot is exciting, and the acting by Washington, Owen, and Foster all have a stellar performance of their own. I couldn't have liked it more.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
TonyB.Aug 12, 2007
"Inside Man' is at its best when Jodie Fisher, Clive Owen and Christopher Plummer are on screen.; theirs is acting on a consistently high level. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for Denzel Washington who is often too mannered; "Inside Man' is at its best when Jodie Fisher, Clive Owen and Christopher Plummer are on screen.; theirs is acting on a consistently high level. Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for Denzel Washington who is often too mannered; this is not his finest hour.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
DavidH.Sep 2, 2007
This movie has all the trappings a heist movie ought to have, engaging plot, solid and diverse cast, slick direction, decent score. all works and looks great together.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
MarkM.Mar 25, 2006
Implausible yet oddly entertaining, a testament to the fine job of the cast and director I suppose. Given the way the plot (finally) plays out, it's quite ironic that the "getaway car" is a Volkswagen.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
DexterJ.Mar 25, 2006
Wow.. This movie was spectacular.. I really enjoyed it. The theatre I was in unfortunately had a fire alarm when it got to the part where Clive Owen walked out of the bank just like he said. And words cannot describe how bad I want to see Wow.. This movie was spectacular.. I really enjoyed it. The theatre I was in unfortunately had a fire alarm when it got to the part where Clive Owen walked out of the bank just like he said. And words cannot describe how bad I want to see what was going to happen after that.. Once again.. fantastic movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
ChipK.Mar 25, 2006
A fantastic film! I'll be seeing this one again and buying the DVD when it comes out!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
DavidC.Mar 25, 2006
If you pay really close attention to small details, there are no surprises as you stay ahead of the game. It's a matter of being able to sort through some of the post-modern elements. Nevertheless, Inside Man is a great story and worth seeing.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
ShelH.Mar 26, 2006
A thoroughly satisfying movie. Compelling from start to finish. (For those who didn't understand the ending, you must not have been paying attention. My wife and I both knew exactly what happened.) Acting is superb, down to the smaller A thoroughly satisfying movie. Compelling from start to finish. (For those who didn't understand the ending, you must not have been paying attention. My wife and I both knew exactly what happened.) Acting is superb, down to the smaller parts, pacing is perfect, and dialogue is original. So far, the best movie I've seen this year.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
KurtC.Mar 26, 2006
I was left feeling bored and unamused. After all the positive reviews I have heard (critics and users alike) I was really expecting a fresh and exciting film, but was disappointed. Washington plays his typical tough-guy under duress role, I was left feeling bored and unamused. After all the positive reviews I have heard (critics and users alike) I was really expecting a fresh and exciting film, but was disappointed. Washington plays his typical tough-guy under duress role, and Foster fails to inspire like she has so often in the past. There is nothing new in Spike Lee's exploration of racial tensions and corruption of power in this weak, slow-moving, and watered down "suspens/thriller." Save your money.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
TonyL.Mar 28, 2006
It has some flaws, but overall I thought it was pretty good. I loved the loud talking, well bosomed lady. Maybe the success of this movie will give Spike the clout to film a project that is close to his heart.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
LarryS.Mar 28, 2006
First 2/3red of the movie was very well done but the last 1/3rd was a big disappointment. What in the world were they thinking casting Jodie Foster in this role. Viewers did not needed to be fed the story with a spoon. Not one of First 2/3red of the movie was very well done but the last 1/3rd was a big disappointment. What in the world were they thinking casting Jodie Foster in this role. Viewers did not needed to be fed the story with a spoon. Not one of Spike's best. The social commentary was lost in the messy plot and sub plots. Clive Owen is terrific!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
FantasyMar 28, 2006
After the garbage I have seen for the better part of a year and a half this was an entertaining film as it kept you on your toes. Denzel Washington was out performed by Clive Owen. Jodie Foster was unnecessary and added little to the film. After the garbage I have seen for the better part of a year and a half this was an entertaining film as it kept you on your toes. Denzel Washington was out performed by Clive Owen. Jodie Foster was unnecessary and added little to the film. The star of the movie was the NY ethnicticty which shined through but only New Yorkers would understand New Yorkers. The ending was a bit of a disappointment as it never explained how Clive learned what was in the box? Still all in all kudo's to Spike Lee, who for once, made a commerical film demonstrating his directing talents without need of using the race card.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
S.GoldMar 29, 2006
A good film with the best thing being the acting from the leads (especially Foster) but Lee's inserts only subtract from the film, a fun film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
JudyT.Mar 29, 2006
Very good film, nice ensemble cast and good storytelling.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
RyanApr 14, 2006
This movie was very well done. The story was intriguing, the acting was great, and there were enough plot twists to keep you guessing. This is definetly a thinking man's movie. Excellent use of the cameras and pacing. This being my This movie was very well done. The story was intriguing, the acting was great, and there were enough plot twists to keep you guessing. This is definetly a thinking man's movie. Excellent use of the cameras and pacing. This being my first Spike Lee movie (I was too young to see most of them), I will most definitely check out his back catalog. A great movie overall.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
TonyA.Apr 17, 2006
different take on a heist flick. pretty original, and very clever.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
DerrickA.Apr 23, 2006
Excellent suspense film. Loved the way the robbery went down. Nothing is what it seems, eh? I was thinking "now who's going to have the last laugh". The movie clearly answered that.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
TonyD.Apr 26, 2006
I rarely see a Spike Lee Joint and end up liking it. Until now. The first lines of this film belong in the most memorable list. Clive Owen steal the screen from Denzel Washington when the 2 are together on screen. Do Not misunderstand me. I rarely see a Spike Lee Joint and end up liking it. Until now. The first lines of this film belong in the most memorable list. Clive Owen steal the screen from Denzel Washington when the 2 are together on screen. Do Not misunderstand me. Denzel Washington Is a fantastic actor. One of my favorites. But Clive Just Rocks. This one of those rare flicks that combine everything from action to comedy to thriller and works. The part when Jodie Foster is called the "C" Word is just classic. If some did not say it i would have. When I said I Have rarely seen a Spike Lee Joint And LIked it. I meant it. "Clockers" "Malcom X" And Now "Inside Man" So Far this one is my fave.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
MarshallApr 5, 2006
it's more of a 9.3. but i gave it a 9 just because it wasn't totaly perfect. but it was amazing nonetheless! i was so entertained it wasn't even funny. but it kinda of was for some reason. :-] anyways, go see it! def. worth a gander.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
billys.Apr 5, 2006
A very entertaining "think thriller" thats a little easy in the "think" department. Spike Lee sells out and makes a big studio Movie For The Masses with a big ticket cast so now he can finance his next two joints without the suits telling A very entertaining "think thriller" thats a little easy in the "think" department. Spike Lee sells out and makes a big studio Movie For The Masses with a big ticket cast so now he can finance his next two joints without the suits telling him what they want!!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
KebbieB.Apr 8, 2006
Solid acting by all (I've seen better by Denzel but still good). Unpredictable twists somehat in the vein of Usual Suspects. Very good movie overall.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
MarcK.Apr 9, 2006
Absolutely overrated. Based on 2005 film reviews and the review of this movie, it is clear to me that most movie reviewers are shills for the film industry, "rooting" for certain films to do well. Great cast, but bad acting, especially Jodie Absolutely overrated. Based on 2005 film reviews and the review of this movie, it is clear to me that most movie reviewers are shills for the film industry, "rooting" for certain films to do well. Great cast, but bad acting, especially Jodie Foster, who had a smirk on her face the entire movie, and I had no idea why. The plot builds for us to see the "twist," and when it's revealed, it's nothing special at all.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
CharlieN.May 17, 2006
Smart and gripping, one of the best movies so far this year!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
KenG.May 26, 2006
Film drags too often, and there is definite fat here that could have been cut out. One of the prroblems with Spike Lee is that in the last few years he's allowed himself to become too self-indulgence, in exchange for discipline.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JoshJul 7, 2006
I thought it was one of the best heist movies Ive seen in a while, it kept me wondering all the way up until the end!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
PeteS.Aug 18, 2006
Great movie, Denzel my favorite actor, looking forward for his next movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
ScottB.Aug 28, 2006
An interesting plot, good acting and character development all fall apart in the last 30 minutes. An utterly unbelievable and inconclusive ending makes this a disappointment.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
RyanS.Aug 9, 2006
Spike Lee, one of my all-time favorite movie directors, notably for his work in the critically acclaimed, "Do the Right Thing", surprisingly changes his style of direction with "Inside Man", a cop based thriller about a bank robbery done by Spike Lee, one of my all-time favorite movie directors, notably for his work in the critically acclaimed, "Do the Right Thing", surprisingly changes his style of direction with "Inside Man", a cop based thriller about a bank robbery done by a brilliant thief. Unlike Lee's previous dramas, "Inside Man" works, even as an action flick, which is a genre that he's never taken before. Like a "Spike fan" may suspect, he still keeps that racy energetic tone, and also keeps his film-making old fashioned. Overall, the shots look great, you'll find some sizzling action, plenty of tense sequencing, and a lot of great dialogue. But the aspect that makes "Inside Man" a true winner, is the work of the ensemble cast, done by Oscar winning-nominated actors Denzle Washington , Jodie Foster, and Clive Owen. They are all terrific here. The movie does have it's shortcomings though, like the awful music and the corn-ball intro. One thing that I also found unappealing was the pull-off : a conclusion too Denzle's line, "Come on this aint' no bank robbery!", that you've probably seen in commercials or trailers. It seemed way too convoluted for such a well-made movie that was perfectly executed for the first 100 minutes. Although it somewhat disappointed me to some extent knowing it could have been a Grade A thriller, "Inside Man" is nevertheless great, classy entertainment, and it stays with you.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
H.CarterSep 5, 2006
The "snappy banter" as one critic put it, fell flat with me---it was ok at first, but it got stale real quick. the story started off good as well, but became transparent and a total let down by about midway through. the direction was pretty The "snappy banter" as one critic put it, fell flat with me---it was ok at first, but it got stale real quick. the story started off good as well, but became transparent and a total let down by about midway through. the direction was pretty good, the actors were pretty good---so I guess it was the writing and the story that were just medicore at best. I'm glad I waited for it on DVD.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
BearOneMar 24, 2006
Solid, witty, but perhaps lacking a punch at the end of the film. Casting and dialogue great. You won't be disappointed too much, but no Usual Suspects.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
MarcD.Mar 24, 2006
Whatever you do, enjoy the movie as it's given to you. Don't hold out for a spectacular ending. Revel in the smallest details. I think this is one of Lee's best directing jobs. And Jodie Foster is excellent. Denzel? Oh yeah.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
SheilaP.Mar 25, 2006
I thoroughly enjoyed this film. There are so many small details you need to pay attention to but the end worth wating for. Acting superb and directing outstanding. Don't miss it!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
BitBurnMar 25, 2006
Best film I've seen so far this year! All actors play Oscar worthy performance, storyline is very slick. Spike Lee impresses me!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
BillC.Mar 25, 2006
Crisp and smart, with a wry sense of humor. A clever heist with a great multi-layered plot. Great acting, though Jody Foster was a bit unconvincing in her role as super fixer. Loved Denzel and Clive, and all the many character actors. Superb Crisp and smart, with a wry sense of humor. A clever heist with a great multi-layered plot. Great acting, though Jody Foster was a bit unconvincing in her role as super fixer. Loved Denzel and Clive, and all the many character actors. Superb soundtrack too!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
AndyG.Mar 26, 2006
I was expecting something spectacular from the reviews, but the movie was a letdown. Denzel was good and Clive was good, but the movie just did not seem suspenseful. There are many weaknesses with the theft. The movie did seem to drag down I was expecting something spectacular from the reviews, but the movie was a letdown. Denzel was good and Clive was good, but the movie just did not seem suspenseful. There are many weaknesses with the theft. The movie did seem to drag down and Jodie F's role was not needed and not inspiring. The movie is better than most from the acting, but that is not saying much due to today's movie crapola. You would be better off to see the Thomas Crown Affair (old one and remake) and avoid this one.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
YaritsaH.Mar 27, 2006
I give this movie an 8 because it was well planned out. The actors did a ver good job acting in this movie i enjoyed it very much and the whole movie had me guessing what was going to happen next.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
BarryS.Mar 29, 2006
People you are rating this movie low are the problem with the average movie going public these days. Throw a few explosions at them, and some wacked out main character that solves his problems with fists and they rate it a ten. And you get People you are rating this movie low are the problem with the average movie going public these days. Throw a few explosions at them, and some wacked out main character that solves his problems with fists and they rate it a ten. And you get extra points for CGI it seems. This movie was great! It reminds me of some of the old detective fictions that were made in the 30's and 40's like the Maltese Falcon, and then later on in the 70's Chinatown. No, Denzel didn't use a gun and blow stuff up ever chance he got, but he was intelligent and methodical in solving the case. This movie moved us through the 3 stages of a detective fiction very fluidly. It also managed to do it in a modern context. While using all the new tricks of film and the technology that we have developed, the film still adhereing to the classic detective fiction motiff. The filming was excellent, and the director managed to get tons of great shots in that helped to set the tone for the movie. The closeups on the characters, the rackish angles that cause uneasiness, and the double focuses helped to present us with a story and feeling that is really unsurpassed by just about anything that has come out this year. AND BEST OF ALL IT IS AN ORIGINAL MOVIE, NOT A SEQUAL, A COMIC BOOK, OR A REDO! Thank you Spike Lee for doing something real and different!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
AnnK.Mar 31, 2006
I found this movie highly entertaining. Yes the plot is implausible at times but the three main leads kept my attention. I enjoyed the dialogue, action shots and the overall theme.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
HansjakobW.Apr 12, 2006
Entertaining but a little self-satisfied, Lee's film has moments of great energy and tension interspersed with scenes that seem interminable. And what's with that old chestnut, the Nazi war criminal? Can't anyone count any Entertaining but a little self-satisfied, Lee's film has moments of great energy and tension interspersed with scenes that seem interminable. And what's with that old chestnut, the Nazi war criminal? Can't anyone count any more? The Christopher Plummer character would have to be in his 90s if the film's "explanations" had any roots in reality. Find some other reasons why movie characters can be odious and evil, WW ended over 60 years ago!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
BillS.Apr 12, 2006
This is Spike Lee's best and puts him in the same league as directors like Hitchcock. The photography, tricks and straight, direction, and the unfolding story kept me rapt and on the edge of my seat the whole time. Denzil's This is Spike Lee's best and puts him in the same league as directors like Hitchcock. The photography, tricks and straight, direction, and the unfolding story kept me rapt and on the edge of my seat the whole time. Denzil's character was a bit too self-righteous, but that's ok as the leading character. Jody Foster's performance was enigmatically appropriate, one of her most complex and interesting since she played the single mom in Little Man Tate. She told great stories with small gestures. Kept me guessing until the end and was a lot of fun. (Loved the lady who solved her unpaid ticket problems using a little Albanian.)… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
MichelleJun 19, 2006
Honestly? I was somewhat disappointed. Jody Foster's role was kind of dumb.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
DanC.Aug 18, 2006
This movie is just okay. Better than many, but at no point does it approach true excellence. It is certainly better than the dreck that Spike Lee has put out too often in his career (what happened to the energetic genius of Do the Right This movie is just okay. Better than many, but at no point does it approach true excellence. It is certainly better than the dreck that Spike Lee has put out too often in his career (what happened to the energetic genius of Do the Right Thing?). I strongly agree with Ebert's review.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
SarahP.Aug 24, 2006
When i saw the commericals i thought it looked stupid but once i actually saw it, i really liked it tho it did confuse me a bit.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
ButteredPopcornAug 28, 2006
Thoroughly entertaining. Spike Lee has a very subtle but pervasive sense of humor. Engrossing. A lot to like about this movie and i can find no fault with it at all.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
RobC.Feb 29, 2008
'Inside Man' never really tries for greatness, and that's fine by me. An excellent premise (the robbery) is somewhat tempered by so-so dialogue (though there are a few exceptions-I think others have pointed them out). The 'Inside Man' never really tries for greatness, and that's fine by me. An excellent premise (the robbery) is somewhat tempered by so-so dialogue (though there are a few exceptions-I think others have pointed them out). The witness interviews were drawn out and a bit unnecessary. And of course there was the standard racial commentary one can expect from Spike Lee. But in the end, this movie delivers where it counts: as a suspenseful, tense thriller with an electrifying performance by Clive Owen as the robber.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
NagaganookNov 4, 2010
Acting -- great, as would be expected. The film doesn't work though: All the twists are revealed or amply clear by about the mid-point, so the thing just sort of stops, but doesn't have an ending. Secondly, Clive Owen steals the papers toActing -- great, as would be expected. The film doesn't work though: All the twists are revealed or amply clear by about the mid-point, so the thing just sort of stops, but doesn't have an ending. Secondly, Clive Owen steals the papers to bribe Christopher Plummer later, right? But then why leave the ring and send Denzel to investigate Plummer? The result of that will be that Plummer's past crimes will be exposed in which case the papers Clive stole become valueless. Right?… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
TyranianMar 6, 2020
Decent heist film with solid acting. The story feels fairly familiar and the screenplay has problems but it's just entertaining enough.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
imthenoobMar 9, 2016
It's a very performance driven film and the actors do a great job at it. Owen and Washington were fantastic but sadly never fully used during the film. Lots of needless sub-plots, Lame attempts at misdirection, and the lack of having a fluidIt's a very performance driven film and the actors do a great job at it. Owen and Washington were fantastic but sadly never fully used during the film. Lots of needless sub-plots, Lame attempts at misdirection, and the lack of having a fluid plot (where one scene just sort of flows into the next) makes Inside Man the kind of film that just fails to live up to it's potential.

It's a good enough movie to watch but I think under the direction of another director, It probably could have been great.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
OnAnarchyJan 20, 2013
Good but not great. Solid acting from all the contributors, but the film doesn't feel like a thriller or heist film. Was expecting more, but a decent film nonetheless.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
beingryanjudeAug 27, 2014
Filled with countless strong performances and Spike Lee at the helm, Inside Man holds all the necessary means to being a successful top-notch thriller. But something is missing, can't quite pinpoint it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
SpangleMay 24, 2014
Overall, Inside Man is a good heist movie with enough negatives to detract from what is truly a really thrilling and entertaining heist. First, the positives. Clive Owen kills it as the bank robber. Really, he and the heist as a whole areOverall, Inside Man is a good heist movie with enough negatives to detract from what is truly a really thrilling and entertaining heist. First, the positives. Clive Owen kills it as the bank robber. Really, he and the heist as a whole are what make this film a success. The trickery and deception he employs really make this a fun and entertaining watch. Denzel Washington also has a good turn as the detective, though he certainly takes a back seat to Owen, as well as Jodie Foster who does great in her role as a "fixer". As we watch the events unfold, it is very entertaining to watch the head-to-head battles between the three as they all represent competing interests concerning the heist. Finally, the ending is great as we learn how everything transpired. There are still some things that make no sense, but I will let it slide here.

On the negative side, as with all Spike Lee films, there are parts where race is shoved down your throat. Luckily, it did not choke the life out of this one, but still felt forced, irrelevant to the storyline, and unnecessary. In addition, the camera work is at times spotty and left me scratching my head and wondering why they chose to use that angle or use that effect, etc. Two scenes in particular (one in which Washington's character runs to the bank doors and one in which Foster's character is patted down by one of the bank robbers) where the camera work is annoying and takes you out of the film entirely.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
ThegodfathersonDec 15, 2013
Inside Man is a sarcasm-packed thriller that remains interesting because of all the talent involved. It’s a refreshing movie that gets your adrenaline racing and continues the potential Spike Lee reignited with 25th Hour four years ago. WhileInside Man is a sarcasm-packed thriller that remains interesting because of all the talent involved. It’s a refreshing movie that gets your adrenaline racing and continues the potential Spike Lee reignited with 25th Hour four years ago. While not every twist in the script works, there are enough goods to keep its shortcomings from mattering too heavily. During these dreary cinematic months, Inside Man is prime entertainment and a much-needed bang for your buck.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
frederikbhJan 28, 2019
Good at times, decent most times, downright embarassing when it tries to be funny. Pacing was way off and the film had me losing interest at times. Spike Lee tries too hard to make his characters funny, badass and likeable and ended upGood at times, decent most times, downright embarassing when it tries to be funny. Pacing was way off and the film had me losing interest at times. Spike Lee tries too hard to make his characters funny, badass and likeable and ended up putting prime junk on-screen whenever the protagonist spoke.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
gracjanskiMar 26, 2021
I like such intelligent movies, especially when criminals are being shown as smart one. There are many clever elements, that surprise you and making you ask, how the counterpart will react to it.
The actors were great also.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
heeldavidJul 21, 2014
Inside Man is really (not to be too cliche) a thrilling ride and probably some of Spike Lee's best work. The performances from Washington, Owen and Foster are just great and approriate for this heist thriller.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
DAL1960Jan 1, 2021
I once thought "Malcolm X was Spike Lee's best collaboration with Denzel Washington. After seeing "Inside Man", for what I think the fourth time,I changed my mind.
Washington stars as Detective Keith Frazier, a hostage negotiator for theI once thought "Malcolm X was Spike Lee's best collaboration with Denzel Washington. After seeing "Inside Man", for what I think the fourth time,I changed my mind.
Washington stars as Detective Keith Frazier, a hostage negotiator for the NYPD. His task for one hot day is figure out how to get dozens of hostages out of bank that was just robbed. His adversary is actor Clive Owen. I've never understood why the public doesn't see more Owen. He's good looking, British and a great actor. Owen and Washington go toe to toe in a two hour plus thriller.
Add the legendary actors Jodie Foster and Christopher Plummer, you have a tense thriller.
This is definitely Lee's most commercial and accessible movie. On a New Year Eve's night where I was basically doing nothing, this was a treat.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
prev
Page:
More From This Movie

76 Critic Reviews

7.3 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 81 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
2 77 Project Hail Mary
3 75 Send Help
4 73 Hoppers
5 72 The Sheep Detectives
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL