Warner Bros. Pictures | Release Date: July 16, 2010
8.7
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 4778 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
4,299
Mixed:
237
Negative:
242
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
7
DavidHJul 23, 2010
The challenge in seeing a movie with such great hype and expectations is that the bar just may be set too high. That's the case, to some degree, with my reaction to Inception. The first third is setup, sometimes too talky and dry. The The challenge in seeing a movie with such great hype and expectations is that the bar just may be set too high. That's the case, to some degree, with my reaction to Inception. The first third is setup, sometimes too talky and dry. The suspension of disbelief on this one?--too much. The premise is such a stretch. Plus, when the movie picks up steam on the back end, it has a familiar, high tech chase movie feel. (By the way, there are so many missed gun shots -- how could the aim be that off from so many bad guys, but the good guys are on the money?! Distracting and cheap.) On balance, it's a kick to see some of the special effects. The actors are solid. Very watchable. And the troubled lead role, ably played by D'Caprio adds depth, along with the layered, clever story. The ending is perfectly structured--love the thinking behind that approach. It's a big screen movie that deserves that scale of viewing. Far better than the average no-brain-required action flick. But, far from groundbreaking. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
DanBJul 26, 2010
After seeing this movie for the second time it made a bit more sense, but the problem with the whole thing is that it didn't actually had to make sense but it tricks us all the way in to pretending that it does. But the core problem of After seeing this movie for the second time it made a bit more sense, but the problem with the whole thing is that it didn't actually had to make sense but it tricks us all the way in to pretending that it does. But the core problem of it is that is difficult to feel anything for those characters that we never really get to know and what is supposed to be love is just an annoying nightmare. On the positive side, it sure is entertaining (if you're not bothered by the pompous soundtrack) and there are some great (unintentional) shots of Joseph Gordon-Levitt's butt. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
JamesLJul 27, 2010
This film is one to be seen but Nolan makes a mistake by masking the story as an over the top action film. Sometimes, we need a moment to pause and reflect on what we are seeing. The sensory over load here really detracts from feeling This film is one to be seen but Nolan makes a mistake by masking the story as an over the top action film. Sometimes, we need a moment to pause and reflect on what we are seeing. The sensory over load here really detracts from feeling satisfaction or appreciation for the movie. I also thought that Ellen Page was simply wrong in her role. She contradicted the complexity upon which everything was based. David Lynch knows how to do this type of film. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
DanF.Jul 16, 2010
Good but i have seen this movie before, it was called Existenz.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
RichardH.Jul 18, 2010
It looked interesting, but the tight camera shots and rapid scene changes incorporating a lot of physical motion, and some of the effects, like bending half of the city of Paris skyward, literally made me feel dizzy and I had to leave the It looked interesting, but the tight camera shots and rapid scene changes incorporating a lot of physical motion, and some of the effects, like bending half of the city of Paris skyward, literally made me feel dizzy and I had to leave the theater early. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
DanaM.Jul 18, 2010
The first 45 minutes of the movie I had NO idea what was going on, made more bizarre by flash forwards and back in time. Be prepared to have to really think to follow this bizarre plot. Fairly long movie as well. Worth seeing on the big The first 45 minutes of the movie I had NO idea what was going on, made more bizarre by flash forwards and back in time. Be prepared to have to really think to follow this bizarre plot. Fairly long movie as well. Worth seeing on the big screen though. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
JackCJul 18, 2010
It was alright. I was kinda confused by what was going on.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
SteveGJul 24, 2010
Interesting science fiction movie that kind of devolves into an action movie. The movie requires a certain amount of attention and concentration, as it becomes a little convoluted. Much like Nolan's earlier work Memento, there are more Interesting science fiction movie that kind of devolves into an action movie. The movie requires a certain amount of attention and concentration, as it becomes a little convoluted. Much like Nolan's earlier work Memento, there are more than a few times when you are challenged to understand what is really happening and in which demension, and that challenge is kind of fun. There are a few wonderful visuals, most of which are early in the film, when we are being introduced to the conceptual framework of the cinematic universe, It is a entertaining, interesting movie, though it probably could have been so much more had the second half not become such a formulaic action movie. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
SusanSJul 27, 2010
Highly enjoyable summer film, but ultimately not terribly imaginative or emotionally captivating to me. On the one hand, I love the "form and function" filmmaking skills of Nolan--he uses the editing of the film as much as the plot to tell Highly enjoyable summer film, but ultimately not terribly imaginative or emotionally captivating to me. On the one hand, I love the "form and function" filmmaking skills of Nolan--he uses the editing of the film as much as the plot to tell the story, which is great. On the other hand, I could never really invest myself in any character, as I wasn't really given a reason to. Ultimately, I didn't care what happened to Tom Cobb, and the characters I did care more about weren't at all the focus of the narrative, although they were masqueraded to be. So, blah blah blah, it's a summer movie, I know, but I'm going to buy into that, then I will say outright that Terry Gilliam's Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus was the recent film that most captivated me emotionally and imaginatively, and that Inception is a great summer blockbuster, but not worthy of the "best of the year" title. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
annaAug 12, 2010
The movie had great special effects but it was lacking in its plot.The director should tell us more about this dream technique and if he wanted to confuse us he should try something different because the only thing he succeeded is to make usThe movie had great special effects but it was lacking in its plot.The director should tell us more about this dream technique and if he wanted to confuse us he should try something different because the only thing he succeeded is to make us throw up. Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
7
Leinad177Aug 12, 2010
I think i was expecting too much from this movie. Christopher Nolan and Leonardo DiCaprio just sounded so awesome. The storyline was A LOT less confusing then i had hoped, but the average joe might have a bit of trouble with it. I would sayI think i was expecting too much from this movie. Christopher Nolan and Leonardo DiCaprio just sounded so awesome. The storyline was A LOT less confusing then i had hoped, but the average joe might have a bit of trouble with it. I would say this is his 4th best film and it's one of the best movies to come out this year. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
FitriAmirrolNov 19, 2010
Nolan provides another lengthy look at his expertise yet again with Inception, two ingenious hours well built with substantial writing and solid performances, despite its innovative yet awfully bewildering premise.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
PaxsterAug 20, 2010
After all the hype I found the film mildly dissapointing. I don't feel enough was done with the clever concept and the amount of gun fire was over the top. Despite this De Caprio does very well as does his side kick. However, this is not onAfter all the hype I found the film mildly dissapointing. I don't feel enough was done with the clever concept and the amount of gun fire was over the top. Despite this De Caprio does very well as does his side kick. However, this is not on the level of 'The Dark Knight'. Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
7
Pete2584Aug 18, 2010
I don't agree with the people who totally slated this film and yet I'm not prepared to side with the people who attack anyone who thought this film was over hyped and offered very little. Personally, I think the film was quite good. However,I don't agree with the people who totally slated this film and yet I'm not prepared to side with the people who attack anyone who thought this film was over hyped and offered very little. Personally, I think the film was quite good. However, in my opinion where this film failed was that it really didn't cause me to feel anything or to even question or think about any aspect of the film. Give me the Matrix, The Usual Suspects, The Sting or a good Alfred Hitchcock thriller any day.

7/10
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
sreekiranMay 29, 2011
awesome movie. a mind blowing script. and the screenplay of course, taking into the dream world. seeing curvy buildings, zero gravity etc. nolan"s dream world has been narrated well. the direction and lead casts performances are pictureawesome movie. a mind blowing script. and the screenplay of course, taking into the dream world. seeing curvy buildings, zero gravity etc. nolan"s dream world has been narrated well. the direction and lead casts performances are picture perfect. cinematography and visual effects are the stunning parts of the movie. the effects like water gushing , bridge setups and mirror mazes. some effects like the limbo state where dreams are constructed and buildings look exactly like a dream land. this is awesome. art work is terrific here. action scenes are novel and unique. the excitement never goes down. the climax is interesting. watch it now!! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
jetboyAug 22, 2010
it looked cool. sounded cool. a movie about a team of people who rob information from a person's dreams. and the movie was cool. that sadi it was confusing and mind boggling, after a while i had no idea what was going on. i was so confusedit looked cool. sounded cool. a movie about a team of people who rob information from a person's dreams. and the movie was cool. that sadi it was confusing and mind boggling, after a while i had no idea what was going on. i was so confused that im not even sure if i liked the movie Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
ChewySmokeyAug 27, 2010
It was alright, a little hard to follow at times, but not too complicated. I would have appreciated a little more expository narrative instead of just taking the main character's word for it, like "this is how it is" "...okay". It was veryIt was alright, a little hard to follow at times, but not too complicated. I would have appreciated a little more expository narrative instead of just taking the main character's word for it, like "this is how it is" "...okay". It was very pleasing visually and I was surprised to see as much action in it as there was, though there were quite a few instances that seemed to just drag on throughout the movie, even some of the action scenes seemed to drag on. All-in-all, an alright movie, though not one I would care to see again and I don't really feel I would have missed anything if I had never seen it at all. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
kris2furAug 28, 2010
I don't know how all you "smart people" are have trouble understanding this damn movie. And don't go listing how your a particle physicist or other rubbish, trying to show how smart you are. If you don't follow this movie you won't get it. IfI don't know how all you "smart people" are have trouble understanding this damn movie. And don't go listing how your a particle physicist or other rubbish, trying to show how smart you are. If you don't follow this movie you won't get it. If you aren't willing to go see a movie with an open mind you won't get it. If you can't watch a movie and accept the rules in place set by that film and think in your dreams there are no rules, you won't get it. With this in mind if you are willing to accept all the above, then prepare for the most thought out physiological movie of the year. The "layering" of the storyline is perfect with each dream. If you don't follow these rules just rate it a zero (Which is ridiculous.) write no positive points and how the expendables was heaps better. Even though your an idiot because they are two completely category films. If you don't like the film you should at least admit it had original ideas, or you could continue to throw feces on you wall whilst making monkey noises. Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
7
Film_Fanatic_15Nov 22, 2010
Christopher Nolan has definitely developed one of the most intriguing and original ideas in Hollywood ever. The only issue here is that Nolan holds on to that simple idea too much, of stealing people's secrets by going into their dreams. TheChristopher Nolan has definitely developed one of the most intriguing and original ideas in Hollywood ever. The only issue here is that Nolan holds on to that simple idea too much, of stealing people's secrets by going into their dreams. The idea is then transformed into amazing and spectacular special effects, but also having too much going on and not introducing them at the appropriate times. As well as an inconsistent flow of what scenes are slowed down, when they should be accelerating into a thrilling moment. And the direct opposite. By the end of the film, it seems that Nolan's intent is unclear and should be shown again to become clearer. Despite the flaws, the main reason that this film is good is due to Nolan's original idea and the cast line-up. Every cast member is notable and all delivering a decent performance. But it seems to much for a film and too much of a great idea, that it seems great when seeing several shots in a trailer, but doesn't execute well in a theater. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
lholzFeb 17, 2011
Inception has a good Syfy idea at its central core basically derived from Roger Zelazny's idea in Dream Master. As the Amazon review summarizes...

"His name is Charles Render, and he is a psychoanalyst, and a mechanic of dreams. A Shaper. In
Inception has a good Syfy idea at its central core basically derived from Roger Zelazny's idea in Dream Master. As the Amazon review summarizes...

"His name is Charles Render, and he is a psychoanalyst, and a mechanic of dreams. A Shaper. In a warm womb of metal, his patients dream their neuroses, while Render, intricately connected to their brains, dreams with them, makes delicate adjustments, and ultimately explains and heals."

Too much shoot em up action for the box office dollars but I still enjoyed it enough to give it a 7.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
FDT44Jul 6, 2011
How far can one man push the limits of filmmaking? What Christopher Nolan creates here is brillantly original and staggering; a masterpiece composed of complex ideas, logical arrangements, mind-blowing effects, 'Memento'-like sequences,How far can one man push the limits of filmmaking? What Christopher Nolan creates here is brillantly original and staggering; a masterpiece composed of complex ideas, logical arrangements, mind-blowing effects, 'Memento'-like sequences, stellar control, and a premise that can only be dreamt of. "Inception" is one of those seldom cinematic pieces that keeps you scratching your head and feeding on your brain throughout, after, and even after-after that. The only complaint, hence a 7 instead of a 10, is not of anything of this film, but those of Hollywood who are so dumbed-down that this blockbuster hit, comparably, has the viewer feeling like a character out of "Idiocracy; at times a bit TOO much to absorb. If grading substance alone over enjoyment, the film is in a class of itself. As metaphysical as it plays, however, the casual moviegoer will be lost within minutes of "Inception." The film demands your full attention, not even a look down to your popcorn can be had in this one. Get ready to think, and think, and think: am I even thinking right now? That's what you can expect---but honestly, shouldn't a film convey such cephal-activity? Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
juliankleissJan 7, 2011
An action story is the means for the movie's real question: is our world real or is it a dream? The danger this idea can create is that people might commit suicide more easily, expecting they will then wake up in the real world. But really,An action story is the means for the movie's real question: is our world real or is it a dream? The danger this idea can create is that people might commit suicide more easily, expecting they will then wake up in the real world. But really, does it matter if our world is real or only a product of our fantasy? If the dream is a paradise compared to the real world (as it also is in the Matrix trilogy) why bother about reality? Why would anyone want to live in a worse world just because it is "real"? In fact, philosophical scepticism claims that our senses are not reliable and therefore cannot tell what is real anyway. Therefore, the only thing I can be certain of is that I am because I am able to think, and rational thinking does not require my senses. However, the protagonists of Inception (as well as in The Matrix) do strive for the "real" world, which keeps the whole movie going, leading to that one last point, when they think they are in the real world again. This movie is just an introduction to lucid dreaming and only tangents philosophy, but it is definitely worth watching. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
rotkuSep 18, 2011
Clever and entertaining mix of sci fi and thriller with plenty for fans of both genres. If anything the side plot of the main character, while giving him some depth, distracts from the main focus of the movie. Well worth watching and and niceClever and entertaining mix of sci fi and thriller with plenty for fans of both genres. If anything the side plot of the main character, while giving him some depth, distracts from the main focus of the movie. Well worth watching and and nice to see an original concept although the fight scenes are not up to the standard of the Matrix. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
beingryanjudeAug 24, 2014
It's difficult to deny Christopher Nolan the brilliance of his concept. Especially when it is presented as beautifully as it is. An ensemble that will go down in history... but I can't help but wishing it was a tad bit shorter.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
MarkMusicMar 20, 2013
Hell, this isn't the best film ever but it's definintely one of the best of 2012. Complex and creative. This should be the number one film over Avatar. At least this was written with since and actual creativity and originality. I would sayHell, this isn't the best film ever but it's definintely one of the best of 2012. Complex and creative. This should be the number one film over Avatar. At least this was written with since and actual creativity and originality. I would say this is one of the top 10 films in 2010. The CGI like for instense ("The city folding over ontop of itself") was pretty good and creative. I say watch it for something different. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
NBAluke579Sep 26, 2013
Inception is a great summer blockbuster. It's pretty intelligent, it's very well thought-out and it manages to be simultaneously entertaining to casual movie-goers as well as film-buffs. I really did enjoy watching this film. But is this filmInception is a great summer blockbuster. It's pretty intelligent, it's very well thought-out and it manages to be simultaneously entertaining to casual movie-goers as well as film-buffs. I really did enjoy watching this film. But is this film a masterpiece or something extremely original? Not at all. I do like Christopher Nolan's films, but him being hailed as a "genius" is hilarious. There are countless directors much better than him, and there are hundreds upon hundreds of films much better than this one. The more I think about this movie, the more I realize that it's nothing more than a solid summer blockbuster. The film is full of stock characters, the film has a lack of any philosophical ambitions or heavy complex themes to truly make it a work of art that can be analyzed for decades to come. What Nolan did do is create a smart summer blockbuster. In this day and age, that's gotta count for something. My Rating:7.8 Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
AndremaxOct 30, 2018
Nothing against the movie, but it's too chewed for a sci-fi movie and soundtrack playing all-the-time is annoying. Despite excellent final, interesting and well elaborated plot, as like Interstellar, looks like Nolan wanted to make sci-fi forNothing against the movie, but it's too chewed for a sci-fi movie and soundtrack playing all-the-time is annoying. Despite excellent final, interesting and well elaborated plot, as like Interstellar, looks like Nolan wanted to make sci-fi for the masses. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
RayzorMooseNov 17, 2013
Inception is exceptional.
The movie is incredible with great special effects and an impressive script. Nolan once again puts on one of his famous ending twists making the film extremely entertaining in and out. The acting is good and the
Inception is exceptional.
The movie is incredible with great special effects and an impressive script. Nolan once again puts on one of his famous ending twists making the film extremely entertaining in and out. The acting is good and the idea is genius.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
ernstApr 4, 2014
This movie without a doubt has one of the best directors of all time. All the shots were perfect in my opinion. The actors/actresses in this movie were really good as well. The thing that really turned me off about this movie is the fact thatThis movie without a doubt has one of the best directors of all time. All the shots were perfect in my opinion. The actors/actresses in this movie were really good as well. The thing that really turned me off about this movie is the fact that my mind would coast and just go somewhere else, it was a really complex movie and confusing to understand. The thing about this movie is it makes you think, a lot. Even the little things in this movie confused for example the names in it were so unheard of and complex I couldn't tell who was who. The only character I knew by name was the one Leonardo DiCaprio played because he played a character with a really simple name. Another thing that really bothered me was the sound, it was so bad I had to turn my TV up all the way for various parts of the movie, then the sound would get really loud and I'd have to turn my TV back down and that's just something that really annoyed me when watching this movie. Overall I didn't like this movie because it was really hard to concentrate on it and understand what exactly is going on. When I did know what was going on it was an amazing movie. The movie had a spectacular ending it made my heart tingle. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
PfenderStrat621Mar 27, 2015
Good movie with some interesting aspects that makes you think about them, but the movie is not as intelligent as everyone thinks it is. With some inconsistent elements that doesn't respect some of it's rules, the movie's world falls apartGood movie with some interesting aspects that makes you think about them, but the movie is not as intelligent as everyone thinks it is. With some inconsistent elements that doesn't respect some of it's rules, the movie's world falls apart sometimes. The script could have been better, there were parts of the film were some sub-plots didn't make sense (like the murderer of Cobb's wife), and at the time the characters were explaining the dream world, they sounded like they were speaking to the audience. But overall, great movie that could have been better If it wasn't a little pretentious. Even with some issues i had with the movie, i admire the effort that was put on it, Christopher Nolan is a talented director. I recommend this film. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Ali_MarashianMar 13, 2017
This one is actually entertaining. Again so "Nolanish", who Im not a fan of, but the imagination is impressive.The film is again, about a story that, well no surprise, I feel is just for the hours you sit to watch the movie, I dont thinkThis one is actually entertaining. Again so "Nolanish", who Im not a fan of, but the imagination is impressive.The film is again, about a story that, well no surprise, I feel is just for the hours you sit to watch the movie, I dont think about the plot after the movie, it doesnt matter really. But look at Inside Out, which is also very original but the story, coming of age, resonates with all of us. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
JumpmanJan 4, 2016
An interesting movie which could be a lot better without the disappointing acting and the weak action. The partial complexity did confuse at some points but overall the plot was ok.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
VirgonoShakaMay 26, 2018
Let's get this out to start; Inception has of the cleverest special effects I have seen, period. That alone makes it worthwhile. The rest is serviceable, with a story that although not that unique, still has some interesting ideas, and coolLet's get this out to start; Inception has of the cleverest special effects I have seen, period. That alone makes it worthwhile. The rest is serviceable, with a story that although not that unique, still has some interesting ideas, and cool characters. My biggest gripe probably would be the music, I like Hanz Zimmer, but I'm sick of his "THIS IS IMPORTANT" tone, and inception is a clear example of it going to far. In the end, I would recommend for the effects alone, but this is one dream that I probably won't have a second time. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
halllllooJan 31, 2018
Inception ist kein Film für jeden, denn er fordert den Zuschauer dazu auf ganz genau darauf zu achten was passiert und wie dies möglich ist. Träume sind dabei das Hauptthema des Films, der Situationen immer wieder clever hinterfragt, undInception ist kein Film für jeden, denn er fordert den Zuschauer dazu auf ganz genau darauf zu achten was passiert und wie dies möglich ist. Träume sind dabei das Hauptthema des Films, der Situationen immer wieder clever hinterfragt, und dabei trotzdem nicht zu philosophisch wird. Man bekommt eine spannende Geschichte geboten, die zwar den Zuschauer dazu zwingt sehr gut aufzupassen,(da man sonst wichtige Elemente des Films nicht versteht)einem jedoch mit einer tiefgründigen, musikalisch schön untermalten und gut inszenierten Geschichte belohnt. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
FilipeNetoMay 12, 2018
This film revolves around the theft of ideas, pushed to the limit, with the thief entering into the mind of another person through a dream made for that purpose. It has the main actors Leonardo DiCaprio, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Ellen Page, TomThis film revolves around the theft of ideas, pushed to the limit, with the thief entering into the mind of another person through a dream made for that purpose. It has the main actors Leonardo DiCaprio, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Ellen Page, Tom Hardy (all in the guise of a team of thieves of ideas) and Ken Watanabe (in the role of a powerful Japanese chairman). Christopher Nolan took charge of the script and direction.

It is undoubtedly an interesting, intellectually challenging and well-crafted film. The rich and intricate script gives us a solid, well-imagined story with good characters (the two main characters, attributed to DiCaprio and Watanabe, are even more worked and function as antagonists). Despite this, the contained and reserved form as the characters demonstrate emotions makes the movie a bit cold from the emotional point of view. The emotions are there, they just prefer to demonstrate them in a discreet way. The script could have even explored the emotional and psychological consequences of stealing ideas, for the thief and for those who are robbed, but prefers to remain in the realm of material consequences. The end of the film is good but, from a certain moment, it becomes slow and predictable. Despite this, praise is given to the performance of Nolan as well as the main actors. DiCaprio fulfilled our expectations, Ellen Page was a pleasant surprise and the rest of the cast was up to the challenge.

Although not a perfect movie, there is no doubt that it is good. It's a movie that will be more pleasing to the more intellectual, audiences who do not like movies where thinking is needed to understand it will probably have more difficulty in enjoying it.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
RidlerJul 6, 2018
El concepto es muy original y creativo pero lo que se me da a mi es que tratan a los sueños como un escenario y nunca se plantea su naturaleza, ademas si el director queria que nos plantearamos si estamos en un sueño o no tendria que haberEl concepto es muy original y creativo pero lo que se me da a mi es que tratan a los sueños como un escenario y nunca se plantea su naturaleza, ademas si el director queria que nos plantearamos si estamos en un sueño o no tendria que haber combinado elementos de la vida real con los de un sueño porque cuando vemos cosas que no tienen sentido queda claro que estamos en un sueño y el unica vez que se plantea si estan soñando o no es al final de la pelicula. Aparte de esto Nolan tiene talento para crear una trama, pero en el resto de puntos generales no tanto, el principal problema son las conveniencias todo pasa porque asi nesecita Nolan que pasen las cosas y hay muchos agujeros de guion que se nota que Nolan esta forzando a la trama. Tampoco es que sabe manejar la camara, mete puntos de transicion en donde no deberia y por ultimo es que siempre se detiene a explicar que esta pasando, para que los mas lentos se enteren. Es una buena pelicula pero ahi se queda no llega a ser mediocre ni tampoco excelente. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
mandrake88Jun 26, 2019
the relevant first movie i can remember that tells you about a dream within a dream. No tragic turns, but a decent plot.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
MahmusSep 25, 2020
This movie is pure exposition, especially the first act. Once the mission starts it gets a bit better, but unfortunately the exposition never stops, and the characters delivering it are honestly not all that interesting.

I also hate how it
This movie is pure exposition, especially the first act. Once the mission starts it gets a bit better, but unfortunately the exposition never stops, and the characters delivering it are honestly not all that interesting.

I also hate how it justifies all the exposition. They literally get rid of a character that knows all the rules and replace him with someone who knows nothing, all so they can explain the rules to her / us. That's the only reason Ellen Page's charcter is in the movie. It feels very lazy.

This is a major flaw in almost all Nolan movies. The characters feel like tools to explain the story and perform the plot rather than real people.

It mostly makes up for this with its concept and structure (aside from the purely expository first act), but even then, it doesn't go as far as it could. For a movie set inside dreams, there was so much potential for surrealism, but Nolan limits himself to rather mindane things like a train in a street, or an avalanche.
The wildest thing is the spinning/zero-gravity hallway, but I kinda would have prefered if it had presented it as an actual spinning hallway by actually keeping the camera static so we see the rotation (like that one still sugests the scene is like). While we get some shots that look like that, it's mostly just poeple flying around and fighting on the walls, which while still impressive, has been done many times.

It also never pays off a lot of its setups.
The whole folding city thing is never done in the actual mission despite being set up in the planning stage. The Penrose stairs are done again, but the effect is not repeated, so it's kinda hard to tell what's happening. The only reason I know it was the penrose thing again it's because Arthur said "paradox" again.

Still, despite all my criticims of this film (many of which apply to most Nolan movies), I think that this movie is very entertaining to watch thanks to it's structure, editing (between the dream layers. For some reason simple conversation scenes are very weirdly edited), music and ending.

It's good. I really like it, but definitely very overrated. Also, not anywhere near ass confusing as many claim (I wish it was more confusing). It's the most Nolanesque Nolan film, for better and for worse.
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
Sosmooth1982Dec 29, 2022
Another one of my favorite movies. I've never seen a movie like this before. Imagine if you really did have a clock that tells you when your going to die.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
xxJohnstonJul 15, 2020
Awesome fresh idea.
Best experience is the first viewing.
Probably not a movie worth watching more than two or three times.
Odds are you will just find yourself liking the film less with each successive viewing.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Am-I-A-MartianMar 22, 2021
An interesting plot that loses a bit of its charm when it insists on action movie cliches. But it's very worthwhile nonetheless.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
AmadouIraklidisNov 10, 2022
This was an alright film. The concept was interesting, and it left some lingering threads for viewers to mull over, and was tense, so it was an exciting viewing with great actors.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
kevinmJul 22, 2010
Any movie that expends a considerable amount of time explaining by its characters what is happening is ultimately not worth seeing except fo some cool fx/alternate realities.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
AngieK.Jul 17, 2010
Movie was not original at all. All the concepts have been used before...left the movie feeling very cheated!!!
3 of 9 users found this helpful
6
BruceS.Jul 18, 2010
I enjoyed this movie til it jumped the shark one too many times. the build up was entertaining, but once it entered the final phase it became one giant chase, each getting more absurd than the last. visually it was stunning, storywise it was lacking
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
HazaelC.Jul 24, 2010
It's not good enough than dark knight...but nolan put di caprio and he's good in this movie!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
Vs.DobbsJul 16, 2010
This movie is visually stunning but also boring as all get-out. The first 20 minutes are okay and the last are okay, but the middle 9 and a half hours are slow moving, inconsistent, and downright sloppy.
4 of 7 users found this helpful
6
JimK.Jul 17, 2010
Sure this has extreme special effects just like any other blockbusters. However, none that one hasn't been seen before. Actually Matrix was the first film of it's kind that totally blew my senses! Inception I felt actually stole Sure this has extreme special effects just like any other blockbusters. However, none that one hasn't been seen before. Actually Matrix was the first film of it's kind that totally blew my senses! Inception I felt actually stole some of it's idea from Matrix but not as effective. Dream within a dream within a dream is nothing new. Central idea is brilliant however could've been executed with better actors. Mostly I'm getting weary of Leonardo DeCaprio's redundant character of this "tortured soul" acting with his wife..very reminiscent of the movie "Shutter Island". In fact the character is one and the same. Same mannerism, redundant accent he seem to have acquired from the movie "Aviator" is becoming very annoying for the subsequent movies he's played in so far. Mainly a very good music soundtrack would've really helped the movie but that was absent making the movie seem very long and slow to get to the point. The ending of the movie however definitely made me think and analyze. I would not recommend this movie to a friend but advise them to wait until it comes out on blu-ray or DVD. Overall I felt cheated as I left the theater. Expand
2 of 5 users found this helpful
6
LizetteCJul 24, 2010
I went to see this movie because my husband was told so many great things about it and the previews looked really good.. It was a good movie but thats about it.. it was not great!!! I would have waited to see it when it came out on DVD.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
JohnPJul 25, 2010
It is a better film than its contemporaries, but is honestly not as good as it has been made out to be. An incredible portion of the film is just superfluous action, and halfway through the movie I began to become bored, as it is quite long It is a better film than its contemporaries, but is honestly not as good as it has been made out to be. An incredible portion of the film is just superfluous action, and halfway through the movie I began to become bored, as it is quite long overall. As well, a few things within the film are repeated so often they become trite and banal, like the stock-audio cacophony used for stereotypical childrens' laughter, and for me only detracted from the film, which was good but not great. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
SteveM.Jul 16, 2010
Not Airbender bad. But not what the commercial makes it out to be. Watching it once was more than enough.
3 of 6 users found this helpful
6
LorenD.Jul 16, 2010
I was waiting so long to see this movie. Leo was great. It was kinda trippy at first, then it just got boring. The movie looked great though.
3 of 5 users found this helpful
6
SebaW.Jul 16, 2010
The only letdown of the movie is its horrible story, its like it was completely left out in the movie and it makes the entire experience just confusing.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
SusanJul 17, 2010
Fight scene was great, otherwise this movie was disappointing. The plot was just absurd--scifi should make SOME attempt to connect with reality...
2 of 3 users found this helpful
6
SueJul 17, 2010
Great effects, good performance by DiCaprio. But the plot is so lame...a dream within a dream within a dream within...Please!
2 of 3 users found this helpful
6
HollyR.Jul 18, 2010
This movie is no MATRIX!! I was hoping for so much more, but in the end it is really about DeCaprio and his relationship with his wife (big yawn). I didn't find myself really caring about any of the characters or the lame premise This movie is no MATRIX!! I was hoping for so much more, but in the end it is really about DeCaprio and his relationship with his wife (big yawn). I didn't find myself really caring about any of the characters or the lame premise (corporate greed) that lead them on their merry chase. Call me BORED. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
AdMJul 21, 2010
Inception has to be one of the most hyped films of this year. I do not blame it (have you SEEN the rubbish that
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
JSetJul 22, 2010
Compared to Avatar, this film overtops it. However, some films continously get good reviews despite the overlying errors within. If you fully understood this film, you are out of your freaking mind. Check yourself into the nearest mental Compared to Avatar, this film overtops it. However, some films continously get good reviews despite the overlying errors within. If you fully understood this film, you are out of your freaking mind. Check yourself into the nearest mental hospital while you're at it. Christopher Nolan had this insane idea with, ironically, is not the most creative. No where near the Dark Knight. That movie had excellent symbolism, story, and character development. This just had an interesting concept. I guess that's just about it with this film. The beginning was confusing, but the rest of the film kinda made sense. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
kateJul 25, 2010
Another over hyped chris nolan film. it's beautifully shot & all the actors hit there marks but there's no thought provoking genius in the script. this is no 'the matrix'. more 'vanilla sky'.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
ConnieDJul 25, 2010
This movie was impossible to follow! It was hard to tell what was real and what was dreams and who was alive and who was dead. The low point was an extended "polar scene" where everyone was dressed in heavy padded white winter wear including This movie was impossible to follow! It was hard to tell what was real and what was dreams and who was alive and who was dead. The low point was an extended "polar scene" where everyone was dressed in heavy padded white winter wear including snow goggles and there were snow plows and skis, but nobody's breath turned white! Without a doubt, the bad guys in this movie were the worst shots in movie history! Over and over again, the white van was bombarded with tons of bullets, but only one of the passengers was hit (a flesh wound from which he recovered). The bad guys in the snow scene were even poorer shots! Very good special effects, but overall not worth the price of the ticket. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
lancekJul 27, 2010
The clever and well-designed details of the beginning quickly fade into a bunch of chase scenes of the most militaristic sort. Sadly, there isn't enough surreality to match the premise that all of this goes on in dreaming minds. The clever and well-designed details of the beginning quickly fade into a bunch of chase scenes of the most militaristic sort. Sadly, there isn't enough surreality to match the premise that all of this goes on in dreaming minds. It's like a Bond movie adding in some dreamy ideas. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
MaxAug 17, 2010
It's not as good -- or as difficult -- as many would lead you to believe. It's easily consumed entertainment (it's two and a half hour running time moves by quite quickly) that likes to think it's much smarter than it actually is. It's muchIt's not as good -- or as difficult -- as many would lead you to believe. It's easily consumed entertainment (it's two and a half hour running time moves by quite quickly) that likes to think it's much smarter than it actually is. It's much better and smarter than most of your typical Hollywood fare, but it fails to live up to expectations. Its characters are flat, and its plot is derivative. It's only slightly better than average. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
NF123Aug 23, 2010
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I loved the film but at the end of the day a dream sequence is a dream sequence and I detest dream sequences. Otherwise a really good film but still it can't completely redeem itself Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
acade365Aug 14, 2010
It was a good movie, but definitely overrated. I watched it expecting a lot more but, while I liked the concept of a dream within a dream, the execution was poor. Sure, the CGI and special effects were great, but there was absolutely noIt was a good movie, but definitely overrated. I watched it expecting a lot more but, while I liked the concept of a dream within a dream, the execution was poor. Sure, the CGI and special effects were great, but there was absolutely no character development for the supporting cast. Also, the constant state of climax made it feel bland: If everything is climax, then nothing is climax. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
tonyGreenAug 28, 2010
Original conceit and great special effects. Invites comparisons to The Matrix, but falls short in my opinion. My main problem is with the pacing - at nearly 2 1/2 hours in length I started to suffer stimulation overload in the second halfOriginal conceit and great special effects. Invites comparisons to The Matrix, but falls short in my opinion. My main problem is with the pacing - at nearly 2 1/2 hours in length I started to suffer stimulation overload in the second half which never stops to catch it's breath Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
sr_81Aug 31, 2010
After the Dark Knight I was expecting something as impressive if not more. Alas it's not to be. Not the hugest DiCaprio fan in the world for a start. He seems to play the same character in every film he's in nowadays. My main problem withAfter the Dark Knight I was expecting something as impressive if not more. Alas it's not to be. Not the hugest DiCaprio fan in the world for a start. He seems to play the same character in every film he's in nowadays. My main problem with the film itself is that its just too overly complicated to be truly entertaining. There are some clever ideas such as the dream within a dream concept and how this can affect the physics of that dream world. You really have to pay close attention though. The sub plot involving Marion Cotillard's character is more intriguing. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
WeyesSep 10, 2010
This film was completely monotonous, and far too long. The characters had no depth at all. When you think about what 'plot' means, you would be able to see that the plot of Inception was so plain and thoughtless that it insults every viewerThis film was completely monotonous, and far too long. The characters had no depth at all. When you think about what 'plot' means, you would be able to see that the plot of Inception was so plain and thoughtless that it insults every viewer it hands out its complimentary rose shades to. Inception may have amounted to something of substance if it had spent more time thinking about what it was lacking and less time running around in zero gravity squealing 'Yay! Look at what I can do!' Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
6
MadMonkSep 12, 2010
It's started out very well but the rest of the movie is merely set pieces for the actions before returning to the main storyline of a man trying to get home to his children. For a movie dealing with dreams, the logic is too logical after aIt's started out very well but the rest of the movie is merely set pieces for the actions before returning to the main storyline of a man trying to get home to his children. For a movie dealing with dreams, the logic is too logical after a while and all the wonderful ability in dreams is no longer explored. Like one of the character said, "why not dream bigger?" Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
6
TubieNov 2, 2010
A decent movie and a very good performance by Leonardo DiCaprio. I think people are over blowing the whole concept of this movie, it's not really that hard to understand, the movie just makes it seem more complicated than it is. The ending isA decent movie and a very good performance by Leonardo DiCaprio. I think people are over blowing the whole concept of this movie, it's not really that hard to understand, the movie just makes it seem more complicated than it is. The ending is particularly good. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
immerkeineahnunDec 14, 2010
really great for all the technicians aspects of the movie...
...(obviously) impressive...(with such names in the crew)...
but about the screenplay...check south park!
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
The_orudJan 8, 2011
Dreams layered on top of dreams makes this a difficult movie to follow. The great action is inhibited by the confusing layers of dreams. Let the confusion be your friend and enjoy the action.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
DeathrompFeb 19, 2011
Without the relentless editing; bevy of name actors; clean, stylish direction; seamless special effects - this would have been a catastrophe. Christopher Nolan has somehow entangled kinetic action with analysis to make a theater experienceWithout the relentless editing; bevy of name actors; clean, stylish direction; seamless special effects - this would have been a catastrophe. Christopher Nolan has somehow entangled kinetic action with analysis to make a theater experience beyond casual - there's a grandiosity, yet artful, almost European smartness to this film that makes for a thoroughly satisfying time. The film somewhat falters in it's last third, yet the wit involved in orchestrating such a feat is enough to make thoughtful action fan giddy with excitement. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
cameron326Feb 26, 2011
A really interesting concept, but the movie falls short in many, many aspects. Character development, apart from Cobb (which is only adequate), is non-existant. Therefore I wasn't emotionally invested in the movie at all. Dialogue is a bitA really interesting concept, but the movie falls short in many, many aspects. Character development, apart from Cobb (which is only adequate), is non-existant. Therefore I wasn't emotionally invested in the movie at all. Dialogue is a bit clunky, with so many expositions at the beginning of the film. The SFX were nice, but we've seen a lot of it before. They lacked the wow factor of say the Matrix, Avatar or Terminator 2. The climax felt rushed and there was way too much actiona and big explosions for what is supposed to be a thoughtful sicence fiction film. Plotholes in a complex plot such as this are inevitable, but for me, there were simply too many.

In summary a great idea, but too much action and not enough character development. The ideas in this movie and the 'setup' at the beginning felt forced in a way that, say, the Matrix never did. This is a clever film for a blockbuster, but its execution falls well, well short of the user reviews on here. The critics are nearer the mark on this one.
Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
6
AlienSpaceBatsJul 30, 2011
Inception should have opened to Mark Twain's famous quote; "other people's dreams are dreadfully wearisome". Thanks to the media machine surrounding Inception, it became impossible for me to approach without wanting to cast aspersions on theInception should have opened to Mark Twain's famous quote; "other people's dreams are dreadfully wearisome". Thanks to the media machine surrounding Inception, it became impossible for me to approach without wanting to cast aspersions on the whole film. Yes, it's more intricate than the majority of run-of-the-mill action films that are released year after year, but that isn't saying much. It's an OK film, if a little boring and with its head firmly up its own arse, but throughout I was reminded of examples where the subject matter was tackled far more effectively. It's sort of like The Matrix of its time; here's a dream, a world of complete imagination! Now, let's solve our problems with automatic weapons. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
DodgerApr 29, 2012
Kind of enjoyed this movie. The concept behind the movie was good but i felt the execution of it wasn't. The story was average and i didn't really like any of the characters.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
RolentoAug 31, 2014
Meh. A good cast and a good premise wasted. I went and watched this expecting cool action with some psychological twist, what I got was arbitrary mechanics not too far from The Matrix and a movie that doesn't even manage to respect its ownMeh. A good cast and a good premise wasted. I went and watched this expecting cool action with some psychological twist, what I got was arbitrary mechanics not too far from The Matrix and a movie that doesn't even manage to respect its own set of rules. Once again, Nolan is acclaimed for doing something incredibly average and adorning it with its dark film colors and serious acting to make it look like it's something more than what it is.

Also, open endings really grind my gears, to me they shout "we want to keep the public guessing so that they'll talk about the movie, even though we didn't put thought at all into this scene, but whatever they'll just think it's intentional and deep and that it stimulates critical thinking!".
Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
MDawgDec 17, 2012
Chris Nolan is hands down one of my favourite directors of recent times, however Inception fall short of the standards he has set so incredibly high. It pains me to say that the story was needlessly convoluted (but not confusing) andChris Nolan is hands down one of my favourite directors of recent times, however Inception fall short of the standards he has set so incredibly high. It pains me to say that the story was needlessly convoluted (but not confusing) and relatively uninteresting. It was unable to grip me even though his use of music and cinematic devices were as per usual of high quality. Di Caprio gave a sense of unease in the role he played but it seemed similar to that of Shutter Island and several other roles he has played in the past. He is capable of so much more but I felt it was not the refined performance he was aiming for. It was a brilliant idea for a film but alas Nolan seemed to be caught up in the idea of "Inception" and thus lost his direction. All in all a good film but personally I won't be watching it again any time soon. Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
6
TrilobiteGJan 10, 2016
Perhaps what I liked the most about Inception, is that from a film making standpoint it is an absolute marvel, directorial wet dream. However, from a story standpoint Inception has a habit of delving (or to be audacious, dreaming) to far intoPerhaps what I liked the most about Inception, is that from a film making standpoint it is an absolute marvel, directorial wet dream. However, from a story standpoint Inception has a habit of delving (or to be audacious, dreaming) to far into it's concept as well as con-skewing itself to Dom Cobb without any massaging to why we have a relationship or a care for his character apart from that he's a father. Don't get me wrong, I like the balls it had to go so far into such a complex idea, the execution is just disappointingly masking pretentious slop. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
ZlayaJul 30, 2013
I tried to watch this movie hew times, and it just doesn't work! Part about dreams is really incredible, but I was immediately turned off after first fifteen minutes of pointless lies about dreams and dreaming. Film is so boring for me andI tried to watch this movie hew times, and it just doesn't work! Part about dreams is really incredible, but I was immediately turned off after first fifteen minutes of pointless lies about dreams and dreaming. Film is so boring for me and has no magic to keep my eyes and mind concentrated. Respect for Nolan, but this one and The Dark Knight are greatly overrated movies, and I leave no chance to tell everyone about it. Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
demolisher7778Sep 30, 2014
One of the most overrated movies of all time. It tries to be a modernized Matrix. But the action was exhilarating and the effects were spectacular which is why Inception gets a 6/10 (decent).
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
6
diogomendesDec 14, 2014
This was such a letdown, really. "Inception" is the rare film that I don't quite agree with the critics. It's got some impressive special effects and an appealing cast, but really that's about it, everything else is way too complex. ProbablyThis was such a letdown, really. "Inception" is the rare film that I don't quite agree with the critics. It's got some impressive special effects and an appealing cast, but really that's about it, everything else is way too complex. Probably have to watch more times to fully understand it, but man... wow, what disappointment.

Pros:

+ Well-chosen cast
+ Good special effects
+ Gorgeous cinematography

Cons:

- Convoluted narrative
- Expository dialogue
- Uninteresting premise

What a shame.
Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
6
Le__XenomorphDec 22, 2014
Using Director Christopher Nolan's slight of hand, he distracts viewers from a convoluted and boring plot with plenty of awesome actions scenes and special effects and Leonardo DiCaprio gives one of his dullest performances of all time. 6/10 (OK)
4 of 5 users found this helpful41
All this user's reviews
6
ArcanaThe4thMay 29, 2019
Despite being visually stunning, Inception does not delve as deep into the themes it presents as I would like, leaving me unable to really sink down in it. Though, for all effects, I was still entertained all through the movie and enjoyed it.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
AlexeySoltanDec 30, 2021
the rules of dream travel are invented on the fly
i started watching it after looking on its score
but i didnt really like it
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
PeterParker2479Jan 3, 2020
I understand why some may adore it, but I just don’t love it. I admire Nolan’s efforts and the cast’s dedication, but overall, it doesn’t sit with me. The premise is great, the directing is solid, the acting is tight, but the film itselfI understand why some may adore it, but I just don’t love it. I admire Nolan’s efforts and the cast’s dedication, but overall, it doesn’t sit with me. The premise is great, the directing is solid, the acting is tight, but the film itself doesn’t hold up to its high points. Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
6
NickTheCritickNov 14, 2021
This last phase of Nolan's filmography (as opposed to the first) fails to excite me. I consider inception a barely watchable film, not bad but really without any particular merit.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
JohnF.Jul 16, 2010
Special effects are spectacular at times, but repetitious. Storyline is weak and confused. Good acting by entire cast.
1 of 4 users found this helpful
5
roberti.Jul 18, 2010
Almost walked out in boredom. Ambiguous, unarticulated mishmash that doesn't let you in on the secret, and, at a certain level, who cares. All sound and light without the signification.
1 of 4 users found this helpful
5
AshmerielJul 16, 2010
"Inception" is a visually dazzling film, whose individual images never quite cohere under a clunking script that throws piles of red-herrings at viewers in a failed attempt to leave them with the same brain tinglings that films like Total "Inception" is a visually dazzling film, whose individual images never quite cohere under a clunking script that throws piles of red-herrings at viewers in a failed attempt to leave them with the same brain tinglings that films like Total Recall and the Matrix left. Nolan gets credit for his ambitious aspirations; but the real question is why bother making a story that has nothing new to offer on the world of dream/thought creation? In the end, "Inception" is a sanguine attempt to repackage old concepts in a sleek, empty way. Stay home and read a Borges book until this is available for rent. Expand
6 of 12 users found this helpful
5
JoeNJul 21, 2010
Bloated dialogue, never ending music, and a storyline that will give you headaches, stop Inception from being a decent movie.
1 of 3 users found this helpful
5
DavidP.Jul 23, 2010
If you go to a movie but don't understand what's going on with the plot yet the visuals and acting are good, did you really see a good movie? If you need to see the movie 2 or 3 times to understand the preise and plot, does that If you go to a movie but don't understand what's going on with the plot yet the visuals and acting are good, did you really see a good movie? If you need to see the movie 2 or 3 times to understand the preise and plot, does that mean it is a great movie? If you must go to the internet to have the plot of the movie explained to you, does that mean the movie was too complex? In my opinion there is a difference between being mentally stimulated as opposed to trying to untie a Gordian Knot! Momento was complex enough to be entertaining. This movie left me dumbfounded. Those folks who said they understood the movie are lying. I'll prove it: Explain how Leo Di and his wife can grow old in limbo (they were in there for 50 years), but still be young. Explain why Saito was so old initially in the film? Explain how Leo and Saito got out of limbo? Why can't Leo see his kids face (but can see his wife's)? IN my opinion what we saw is that Leo is trapped in limbo!!!!! The whole movie was one big dream. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
JamesD.Jul 26, 2010
Not very good really. I've heard the word visionary thrown Nolan's way, but this film was the work of a rather sterile imagination. Yes, it had many layers of narrative cleverly interweaved with eachother, but there was little to Not very good really. I've heard the word visionary thrown Nolan's way, but this film was the work of a rather sterile imagination. Yes, it had many layers of narrative cleverly interweaved with eachother, but there was little to compel me at its core. The root cause of Cobb's state of mind just didn't grab me - partly as this relationship was never given the chance to develop to a tangible level. The elements of subconscious displayed were tame and the approach to the dreamworld rather banal - focusing as it did mainly on bland designs, bendy gimmicks and exploding things. There was little edge to Nolan's vision, he seemed quite happy to drown us in relentless exposition and unimaginative slow-mo shots. Scenes were very quick and at no point approached the atmosphere and interest of a real dream. A shame, because at their best, this is what films can do - engineer the quality of a waking dream. Compare Inception to the more intriguing work of Lynch, where scenes seduce with the perfect balance of the real and surreal, and whose images tend to linger in the mind. On top of this, Nolan is simply not a very good director of action; he is quite loose with the camera, and I yearned for more flair and invention in these scenes. Instead, he relied on an incredibly insistent score to give the action some punch. For a film about dreams and the subconscious, it was curiously impersonal and mechanical. Certainly, the real danger and sexuality of the subconscious might scare off mainstream audiences, but Nolan was given free reign to do what he wanted - so why not do something more interesting? Freud and Jung would find little to interest them here, as the film is less concerned with psychology and more with the narrative possibilities afforded by a convoluted dreamworld fiction. Perhaps Nolan does dream of corporate worlds and Bond fortresses. Unfortunately, such things don't interest me. Expand
19 of 59 users found this helpful
5
TBoneGJul 16, 2010
Can we please stop giving these directors such freedom to screw with us and explain their nonsensical b.s. as a "dream" or a "flashback"? Enough with you film school dropouts who walk away from movies like this not understanding jack yet Can we please stop giving these directors such freedom to screw with us and explain their nonsensical b.s. as a "dream" or a "flashback"? Enough with you film school dropouts who walk away from movies like this not understanding jack yet exclaiming "that was brilliant"!!! Expand
6 of 12 users found this helpful
5
LoriG.Jul 17, 2010
The idea behind this movie seemed original enough, but I didn't much care for it. Normally, I love this genre of film, but truth be told, both my sister and I kept falling asleep, despite the very loud volume in the theater. I just The idea behind this movie seemed original enough, but I didn't much care for it. Normally, I love this genre of film, but truth be told, both my sister and I kept falling asleep, despite the very loud volume in the theater. I just didn't find any of the characters compelling, and the plot seemed full of holes. Some great special effects, but that was about it for me. Expand
4 of 8 users found this helpful
5
MarkV.Jul 20, 2010
People... it wasn't THAT good. Hard to follow and frankly not that interesting.
12 of 24 users found this helpful
5
MartinS.Jul 16, 2010
Okay... I expected so much from this movie, and it was such a freakin' let down. This is not the second coming Nolan fans. this movie sucked and there is no connection to Kubrick other than wow -- he had water popping out and an Okay... I expected so much from this movie, and it was such a freakin' let down. This is not the second coming Nolan fans. this movie sucked and there is no connection to Kubrick other than wow -- he had water popping out and an elevator sequence shot on a huge ferris wheel... big whup. Expand
4 of 8 users found this helpful
5
SausageJul 27, 2010
Okay...I get it!! This movie is the most hyped piece of celluloid since last months flavour!! But does that make it good?...No!!! I hate to break it to all u lovers of everything 'new', but this story is old hat! Through the Okay...I get it!! This movie is the most hyped piece of celluloid since last months flavour!! But does that make it good?...No!!! I hate to break it to all u lovers of everything 'new', but this story is old hat! Through the twilight zone years, shutter island and every other 'am I dreaming' movie this has been done, its just more complex and full of its own 'amazingness'!!! Dont get me wrong, this movie was clever in its own way, it had pretty good special effects and the fact that Nolan could hold this jenga tower together is a testiment to his ability. However what didnt work for me, was it tried to be way to clever for its own good, the music was copied and pasted from shutter island etc etc, but the worst above all was that the underlying current through the entire movie...was greed!! Everything that was done, was for ones self gain, Think about it.... When the dust settles down I hope everyone realises that it was not the fact that this movie was so great and life bending, but that it was the first blockbuster in a long time that made us think...obviously some more than others...and for that Im giving it its marks!! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
batsAug 12, 2010
Great when viewed again, otherwise credit goes to SFX and camera shots. I was about to give 7 but after reading JaneC review, this person seems to give the most unbiased reviewng- mentioning the Japs coudn't speak a single english word.Great when viewed again, otherwise credit goes to SFX and camera shots. I was about to give 7 but after reading JaneC review, this person seems to give the most unbiased reviewng- mentioning the Japs coudn't speak a single english word. Music added the depth and the script was going in a whole new direction until the controversial ending made me cold! Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
wisaakaAug 19, 2010
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Inception... where do I begin? Well, perhaps my expectations were a bit high after one of my film snob friends called it "the first truly important film of the century." It's moderately entertaining, but calling it anything more than a decent movie is a bit of a stretch. People call it original, but it's like a dreamworld version of the Matrix (which used ideas that had already been around a while, but at least made it exciting). However, a dreamworld should be so much more than just a sterile, realistic environment. My thoughts about how bland the dreams are here was magnified after watching the Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus. That's a movie that showed true imagination and creativity.

I do enjoy other Nolan films (i.e. Memento, TDK), but I felt no thrills here. Part of the problem is that there is no real consequence of failure. Sure, you may be stuck in "limbo", but it's just another level of dream and you may not be able to escape, but at least you aren't dead.

The snow level was particularly irritating as it just seemed like it was pulled straight out of a modern shooter game. It was very reminiscent of a level of Call of Duty: MW2.

It's also amusing to me that the antagonist is named Mal, which means "bad". Really, we couldn't have come up with a better name to call our villain than "bad"? It was by no means horrible, but really, I don't see why it's called original, or amazing when it's merely entertaining. It's an average movie with an above average effects budget.
Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
5
Leonix7791Aug 22, 2010
Personally,the concept of the movie is not bad.But the plot is just too hard to follow,less action,and some "Why" comes to my mind in some scene.When i was watching this,i keep telling myself "when is this movie going to end ?" Because itPersonally,the concept of the movie is not bad.But the plot is just too hard to follow,less action,and some "Why" comes to my mind in some scene.When i was watching this,i keep telling myself "when is this movie going to end ?" Because it just plain boring in my opinion.Maybe i'm just not good at appreciate "new idea".Hell...even The Dark Knight was 1000X better then this :/ Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews