I Think We're Alone Now
Momentum Pictures | Release Date: September 14, 2018
5.8
USER SCORE
Mixed or average reviews based on 21 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
8
Mixed:
10
Negative:
3
Watch Now
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
7
CosiMOLOGOOct 6, 2018
La película es selección oficial y compite en el Festival de Sitges 2018, se presentó en Sundance, donde fue galardonada con el premio a la realización excelente. Un mundo devastado por una extraña enfermedad que exterminó a todas lasLa película es selección oficial y compite en el Festival de Sitges 2018, se presentó en Sundance, donde fue galardonada con el premio a la realización excelente. Un mundo devastado por una extraña enfermedad que exterminó a todas las personas, en donde aparentemente, solo queda vivo un hombre que dice disfrutar de esa soledad, se ve "amenazado de compañía" cuando llega una segunda sobreviviente. Un dilema explorado en alguna películas, como Soy Leyenda del 2007, en donde un hombre queda "completamente" solo en el planeta, solo con la compañía de su perros e infectados de una extraña enfermedad que los convirtió en zombis. Acá no hay muertos vivientes que quieran comerse vivos al protagonista de la historia, interpretado magistralmente por Peter Dinklage, solo existe la soledad abrumadora que aparentemente el protagonista disfruta, pero que es puesta a prueba cuando conoce a Grace. Esta sensación de soledad se transmite al espectador con el ritmo de la película, algo lenta en partes, pero nunca llega aburrir.

Las ideas que Del tiene sobre la sociedad y la compañía son negativas, pero a medida que la película avanza descubrimos que esta falta de humanidad y pensamiento del protagonista pueden cambiar. Nos presentan a Grace, interpretada por la entrañable Elle Fannig, una chica que también sobrevivió a la enfermedad. Es joven e ingenua, no llega a darse cuenta que la "libertad" conlleva más responsabilidades (cual tío Ben). El director con una poesía visual y un ritmo pausado toca temas como la soledad y la pérdida, llegando a equilibrar todos los temas que se propone. con el telón de una historia de ciencia ficción. I think We´re Alone Now, posiblemente no llegue atraer al público que busca algo más simple de una historia de ciencia ficción, pero si asombrará a aquel que tiene ganas de reflexionar.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
John935Jul 26, 2020
I tend to like movies that are mindbangs and this is definitely that. The apocalyptic/sci-fi angle is not terribly important, it's just a fait accompli. But every banging other thing is (important). Moodier than Antonibangingoni. Director/DPI tend to like movies that are mindbangs and this is definitely that. The apocalyptic/sci-fi angle is not terribly important, it's just a fait accompli. But every banging other thing is (important). Moodier than Antonibangingoni. Director/DP Morano is one to watch out for, keep an eye on, etc. I Think We're Alone Now (ITWAN) is as if Bergman made a movie NOW in N. America with only 4 actors and just kind of let it bang people's minds.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
HotelCentralJul 30, 2019
1) Peter Dinklage is a really good actor and he makes characters more interesting than they would otherwise be.
2) His character in this film is an outsider, a loner, the guy who's never more alone than when surrounded by people he doesn't1) Peter Dinklage is a really good actor and he makes characters more interesting than they would otherwise be.
2) His character in this film is an outsider, a loner, the guy who's never more alone than when surrounded by people he doesn't connect with. If you've never felt like that at all (if you're always surrounded by tons of awesome friends) then you're probably not going to get the character and you probably won't like the film.
3) There's virtually no action in the typical sense. There's a little menace, now and again, because you never know what might be around the next corner, but that's about it. OK, we see a little bit of corpse dragging, but . . . you know . . .
4) We get almost nothing about the cause and nature of the apocalypse. A little disappointing but I got over it. On the other hand we do get a little fly fishing and fish gutting.
5) I didn't really appreciate the film's title until the very last scene and then it hit me like a sudden fountain of droll irony. If droll irony can actually fountain.
6) This is not a great film, but it's a solid entry into the genre because Dinklage makes it so. You should therefore "engage".… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
JLuis_001Sep 22, 2018
This is kind of a film adrift that sailed into an ocean and didn't know how to find its way back to the shore.

It starts well but also begins to get lost slowly, especially due to the slow narrative and although it tries to immerse you inThis is kind of a film adrift that sailed into an ocean and didn't know how to find its way back to the shore.

It starts well but also begins to get lost slowly, especially due to the slow narrative and although it tries to immerse you in its atmosphere, it never achieves it, in particular because everything feels conventional until the film shows surprisingly and out of nowhere its plot twist that instead of feeling shocking and unexpected feels more like something forced.

The ending that builds never achieves an emotional catharsis and the questions that leaves in the air don't help to leave a better impression.

I highlight the work of Peter Dinklage and Elle Fanning but above all Dinklage's who easily steals the entire film.

In the end it wasn't what I expected but I don't judge it with my expectations but with what the film gave me and sadly its proposal and story did not satisfy me. A shame… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
amirhassanOct 1, 2018
dinklage gives an incredible performance in an awful movie.fanning is acceptable under the shadow of dinklage.the movie has no way to make you keep watching it half way through and is much more predictable than you would think.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
pedrojoaovrJul 20, 2020
Na boa, esse filme é um saco. Perdi 1h40 da minha vida assistindo isso. Não tem historia muito menos entretenimento. Não assistam isso.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
SettsuOct 20, 2022
Starts out very strong then completely and utterly collapses in on itself at the third act. The final scene feels entirely unearned and belonging to a different movie than the one you just watched. The film succeeds as a master class inStarts out very strong then completely and utterly collapses in on itself at the third act. The final scene feels entirely unearned and belonging to a different movie than the one you just watched. The film succeeds as a master class in demonstrating how an actor’s exceptional performance (Dinklage’s, in case there was any question) can elevate a story far beyond its face value.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
More From This Movie

51 Critic Reviews

5.8 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 81 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
2 77 Project Hail Mary
3 75 Send Help
4 73 Hoppers
5 72 The Sheep Detectives
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL