|
Warner Bros. Pictures |
Release Date:
May 6, 2005
|
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
432
Mixed:
80
Negative:
81
|
Watch Now
| Review this movie |
|
| Check box if your review contains spoilers | 0 characters (5000 max) |
User Reviews
Aug 14, 2012
One of the worst films of all time. Bottom line for the poor performance of Paris Hilton. Does she really think that's an actress? Note 1. Because dying to see Paris Hilton always worthwhile.
4 of 8 users found this helpful44
May 7, 2007
Not scary and dull. I kept pausing it and walking away.
1 of 2 users found this helpful
Dec 28, 2005
I expected this movie to follow in the footsteps of the orignal classic House Of Wax. Totally disappointed with screenplay and artwork.
1 of 2 users found this helpful
Feb 28, 2007
1 of 2 users found this helpful
Sep 26, 2011
The wax statues were well-done as well as the ghost town. And I must admit that I had some chills but, even them weren't enough to compensate the bad acting (except for Cuthbert) and poor storyline.
7 of 15 users found this helpful78
May 9, 2016
A disgrace to the 1953 film that makes you wonder why it still exist up to this day and for on and on. House of Wax is nowhere near that horrifying from the original that is way better (but not scary as well) than this film.
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
Jul 29, 2018
The main problem is that the supporting characters are unlikable, and the overall plot structure and setup are very weak.
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
Nov 1, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
Feb 12, 2021
A boring in name only remake This Thriller is not worth watching but I’m glad that Jaume Collet-Serra has moved onto better things and I’m glad his directorial flare is still there
0 of 41 users found this helpful041
Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
