Read User Reviews and Submit your own for Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone

10

Kevin_Manning_Aug 26, 2023

Prepare to be enchanted. "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone" is not just a movie; it's a portal to a world of wonder, adventure, and friendship that continues to captivate hearts worldwide. In a world where movies come and go, "HarryPrepare to be enchanted. "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone" is not just a movie; it's a portal to a world of wonder, adventure, and friendship that continues to captivate hearts worldwide. In a world where movies come and go, "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone" remains a beacon of pure cinematic magic. It invites us to embrace the childlike wonder within us, to believe in the extraordinary, and to cherish the enduring magic of friendship. So, whether you're rekindling your connection with an old friend or introducing the next generation to this masterpiece, be prepared to be swept away on a broomstick of nostalgia and wonder. Accio popcorn and enjoy the enchantment!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

canisfamiliarisJul 24, 2023

This movie holds so much nostalgia for me. My wife and I saw it when we were in highschool together as boyfriend/girlfriend. It was so great then, and it still holds up to this day. This movie kicked off our decades long obsession with the HPThis movie holds so much nostalgia for me. My wife and I saw it when we were in highschool together as boyfriend/girlfriend. It was so great then, and it still holds up to this day. This movie kicked off our decades long obsession with the HP universe. CLassic film here. See it and its sequels.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Bigwillyhaver69Jul 21, 2023

Amazing this movie, is really interesting, amazing, a bigger sorprise......

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

elunicoazazelMay 29, 2023

It is true that it could be much better, and that important things from the books should have been included.

Nevertheless, it is a very good adaptation that opens the Harry Potter universe.

I will always have a special affection for this movie.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

digimon-e-mMay 5, 2023

harry potter is my life, words can't describe the perfection of the books and the movies, and how i adore this world, harry potter and the sorcerer's stone is just magical, wholesome, scary, cosy, mysterious, epic, interesting, BEAUTIFULharry potter is my life, words can't describe the perfection of the books and the movies, and how i adore this world, harry potter and the sorcerer's stone is just magical, wholesome, scary, cosy, mysterious, epic, interesting, BEAUTIFUL movie that is a must watch for EVERYONE. a definitive, flawless 1010… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

phoenix_prjctApr 8, 2023

Final Thoughts:

Harry Potter would undoubtedly have been a classic in its book form, but, thanks to the cast and crew of the film adaptations, the series became a phenomenon. From detail-attentive storytelling to character castings that feelFinal Thoughts:

Harry Potter would undoubtedly have been a classic in its book form, but, thanks to the cast and crew of the film adaptations, the series became a phenomenon. From detail-attentive storytelling to character castings that feel like the creators performed real magic to pull them from the pages, Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone smartly uses its beefy runtime to tell an unmissable coming-of-age fantasy. A strong, old-timey feel creates distinct aesthetics, and John Williams’ musical score is a special magic of its own.

For the full review and more posts like it, visit my site: https://thephoenixprjct.com… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

egradeMar 26, 2023

la película es hermosa con una música grandiosa personajes carismáticos y adapto muy bien los hechos del libro para que se den una idea esta película dura 2 horas y un audiolibro de la piedra filosofal dura mas de 8 horas

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Fixer84Mar 16, 2023

The first chapter of a global phenomenon of a generation. Looking back on it today it almost feels very nostalgic, but it's still great.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Kdog152Jan 15, 2023

While it is slightly overrated, it's still the magical beginning of the Harry Potter Cinematic universe we all love to this day over 20 years later. The special effects were also good for a 2001 film.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

Manuel89qqNov 7, 2022

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Manuel189qqOct 21, 2022

⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

vlandovoigtOct 7, 2022

My favorite movie! It has its flaws, but I still love it a lot and give it a 10

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

koo_xinAug 20, 2022

The Harry Potter book series is consistently great. The movies, however, much less so.

The later films are not the greatest whilst the first film is an absolute masterpiece. Ironically it is one of the lowest rated. If you could travel backThe Harry Potter book series is consistently great. The movies, however, much less so.

The later films are not the greatest whilst the first film is an absolute masterpiece. Ironically it is one of the lowest rated. If you could travel back in time to the early 2000s you would quickly remember just how gigantic this film was. For YEARS, even after the 2nd film, it was this film that was constantly rerun on TV stations. It was HUGE and deservedly so.

The visuals are stunning, the pacing is fantastic, the dialogue is witty, the scary parts are truly terrifying, but most of all, the music is unforgettable and brilliant.

Harry's Wondrous World represents this movie so well. It makes you feel giddy with childish excitement while leaving you with an unmistakable sense of dread. JK Rowling owes a lot of her success to this masterpiece of a film.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

kacperiscool20Aug 14, 2022

This movie is based of the book, but unlike the book, the movie just skips the first part just so it can get to him going into hogwarts and all this wizard magic-ness faster. This movie is instantly forgetable, and I wouldn't recommend it to anyone.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

matthewb02jrJun 9, 2022

Amazing film! I love every second of it! I love how we go on the journey with Harry and he feels like he’s apart of the audience. It’s full of heart, great characters, amazing writing, and it’s a masterpiece imo.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Rdneck00May 9, 2022

This is my 5th favorite Harry Potter movie. I think its a great introduction to the franchise.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

PatFlores2003Apr 29, 2022

I like this movie being one of my favorites of the Fantasy genre, I must confess that it is my favorite of the franchise along with Deathly Hallows Part 2. An excellent movie that despite regular visual effects in several scenes, is no excuseI like this movie being one of my favorites of the Fantasy genre, I must confess that it is my favorite of the franchise along with Deathly Hallows Part 2. An excellent movie that despite regular visual effects in several scenes, is no excuse to watch in family this tremendous jewel of 2001 and the children deserve more to see this movie as well as the fans.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

karolRuedaApr 7, 2022

Comentario de Harry Potter y la piedra filosofal Harry Potter y la piedra filosofal es una película inglesa de genero fantasía, estrenada en el año 2001, dirigida por Chris Columbus y protagonizada por Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint y EmmaComentario de Harry Potter y la piedra filosofal Harry Potter y la piedra filosofal es una película inglesa de genero fantasía, estrenada en el año 2001, dirigida por Chris Columbus y protagonizada por Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint y Emma Watson. En la película un niño de once años llamado Harry Potter descubre que es mago y va a un colegio de magia donde conoce grandes amigos, vive aventuras y es expuesto a peligros inimaginables.
En general, Harry Potter es una historia fantástica, donde la amistad y la inocencia infantil es lo más importante sin dejar de lado el ingenio y la inteligencia de cada uno de los personajes. Es una película realmente increíble en la que cada escena y cada parte de la trama están bien pensadas y son muy fieles al libro en el que película se basa. El humor inocente y los diálogos bien pensados para crear tensión en los momentos más importantes hacen que en momentos la película llegue a enternecer al espectador, esto junto con la triste historia de Harry hacen que, aunque la película sea inicialmente pensada para niños se convierta en un placer verla a cualquier edad. La ambientación de la película es increíble incluso para la época, Hogwarts el colegio donde transcurre la película, es una maravilla de la arquitectura gótica y aunque no sea un edificio real no se duda de su belleza. Otros escenarios de la película son iguales de impresionantes. En definitiva, es una película maravillosa y muy recomendada para quienes quieren visitar un mundo diferente al ordinario y deseen darse una zambullida en la magia. Una muy buena película para pasar el rato y quedar maravillado con el mundo de Harry Potter. Merece una calificación de 10 estrellas en una escala de 0 a 10.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

kyle20ellisMar 25, 2022

I really liked this film, but I much prefer the book, which has a lot more magic and wonder. Daniel Radcliffe is very likable as Harry, and he is given solid support by a funny Rupert Grint and a good Emma Watson, though she was annoying atI really liked this film, but I much prefer the book, which has a lot more magic and wonder. Daniel Radcliffe is very likable as Harry, and he is given solid support by a funny Rupert Grint and a good Emma Watson, though she was annoying at times. The scene stealer was definitely Robbie Coltrane; I actually can't imagine anyone else playing Hagrid, Coltrane was just hilarious. Alan Rickman and Maggie Smith were also great, but for me the standout was the late Richard Harris. Now I much prefer Harris's interpretation of Dumbledore. He was soft-spoken, and actually fitted the part better. Both of these qualities were lost in the interpretation that Michael Gambon gave. I am not saying that Michael Gambon was bad, he just wasn't my ideal choice for Harris's replacement. The film is fairly faithful to its source material, and looks very beautiful. However, it is a bit long, and very young children may find Voldemort too frightening. I know because I have triplet brother and sisters who saw it, and couldn't sleep for about a month after viewing. In conclusion, a very good film, well performed and quite dark. 8/10 Bethany Cox… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

adeel12345678Mar 19, 2022

this movie is a classic. It's not as good as people say it is and it has all the bad things that people say it has, but still it's good. The CGI is outdated and the color grading is poor so don't expect much from the visuals because it's 2this movie is a classic. It's not as good as people say it is and it has all the bad things that people say it has, but still it's good. The CGI is outdated and the color grading is poor so don't expect much from the visuals because it's 2 decades old. The overall theme is highly childish for which I have mixed opinion. Director Chris Columbus directing style sometimes becomes annoying because he gave the movie a childish theme and it sometimes fits with the movie and sometimes not so well. I liked his style sometimes and sometimes, it wasn't bad, but, still, didn't fit.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

glommanJan 15, 2022

I didn't grow up with either the Harry Potter books or movies, but I still very much enjoyed this one. Sure, it's aimed at a teenage/child audience and a lot of the quirks of the wizarding world seem very infantile and not well thought out toI didn't grow up with either the Harry Potter books or movies, but I still very much enjoyed this one. Sure, it's aimed at a teenage/child audience and a lot of the quirks of the wizarding world seem very infantile and not well thought out to an adult audience. But it's still a fun and heartwarming adventure about courage, friendship, and even self-sacrifice.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

Dostoyevsky3Jan 8, 2022

A mixed tone, bloated runtime, uneven plotting, and unbearable expository pacing completely diminish the film's desire to provide a more cheery and empowering story that its following installments fail to achieve. The Sorcerer's Stone'sA mixed tone, bloated runtime, uneven plotting, and unbearable expository pacing completely diminish the film's desire to provide a more cheery and empowering story that its following installments fail to achieve. The Sorcerer's Stone's minuscule intentions are unable to overcome its colossal troubles to adapt the story.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

9

MuhamedHDec 31, 2021

The movie is fun and amazing. The story is very good and the world is very amazing. For acting, Harry was good and hurt some scenes where the acting was not strong, but it was good for someone acting for the first time. And Ron was veryThe movie is fun and amazing. The story is very good and the world is very amazing. For acting, Harry was good and hurt some scenes where the acting was not strong, but it was good for someone acting for the first time. And Ron was very excellent, and unfortunately he did not receive an award for it. And Hermione did not appear much but when she did, her performance was excellent. The rest of the actors were very good, the music is very, very nice. The movie is very nice, but there were some illogical and some incomprehensible things. The movie is very beautiful and interesting, and I recommend watching it… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

JJ2FAS4UDec 29, 2021

----------------------------------8.4/10-----------------------------------

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

GemsicleDec 9, 2021

Director Chris Columbus is profound when it comes to him working with children such as Macaulay Culkin from Home Alone and the Hillard child actors from Mrs. Doubtfire, which is evident enough for him to be the most ethical to establish thisDirector Chris Columbus is profound when it comes to him working with children such as Macaulay Culkin from Home Alone and the Hillard child actors from Mrs. Doubtfire, which is evident enough for him to be the most ethical to establish this adapted franchise. Columbus works with children who all enroll at the same campus, which makes him feel very delighted about his job, however, eighty-five percent of them are just consultants while the other fifteen percent are names JK Rowling put in her novel.

Little Daniel Radcliffe plays the orphaned Harry Potter who has lived for a decade with his callous cousins, the Dursleys, who have an opposing opinion with Harry when it comes to magic. “Magic” is a word forbidden in the Dursleys' residence. When magic occurs during a scene, we get to sit back and relax and watch the aesthetic philosophy of the Harry Potter world while charming and triumphant music plays in the background by the one and only John Williams. Harry Potter’s name is prominent in his new world, especially by his peers, which makes him feel astonished and questioned when he is introduced. Rubeus Hagrid, who brings Harry into the throng of Muggles and out of it into the throng of witches and wizards, substantiates Harry’s life origins and blissfully compasses him through his wizarding orientations. This movie shows us what it is like for a fresh student to enter a new league in education, (for a former child celebrity that is). This league begins at the age of eleven, which is like a child prodigy skips secondary school and begins college posthaste. It is also enough time to earn credits in college and end it at the age of a typical high school student, only with a master’s degree if they desire. This is a film that is so full of joy and delight that these children are overwhelmed to be out of a reality school and finally ready to learn about their future. From my point of view, the magical campus, Hogwarts, is like a school that is way more difficult than getting into Harvard, because it is restricted only to people who can manipulate motion, and it was established many centuries prior to Harvard just by looking at its furniture and construction. If you are interested in art or any kind of fantasy, definitely check out this flick; it is an engaging, triumphant, extravagant, charming, and overall envisioned motion picture event.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

adzcantillasNov 24, 2021

If throwback Who-Knows-When everyone's saying Witch Doctors are wishing a Discovery of an Elixir of Existence I'm like thinking going out a Modern Digital Age what if Cosmetic Medicine is pushing with knowing a Fountain of Youth. You knowIf throwback Who-Knows-When everyone's saying Witch Doctors are wishing a Discovery of an Elixir of Existence I'm like thinking going out a Modern Digital Age what if Cosmetic Medicine is pushing with knowing a Fountain of Youth. You know what? Everyone's just ending up with Death anyway knowing Body will Decay. Why not just go munching with Chocolates.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

ANTtheKNEEEENov 19, 2021

I'm very late to the harry potter scene. Watching them all now. This started it all. It's a great world :D

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

jomari18Nov 4, 2021

amazingly magical movie, definitely a highlight in my childhood days, a must watch

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

JAKEJACOBJORDSep 17, 2021

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Gamzguy17Aug 21, 2021

This is a film that succeeds at creating a whole new fantasy world for us to explore; populated by a cast of characters that are all very likeable and of course, magical. In fact, that's pretty much the film in a nutshell, magical. I mustThis is a film that succeeds at creating a whole new fantasy world for us to explore; populated by a cast of characters that are all very likeable and of course, magical. In fact, that's pretty much the film in a nutshell, magical. I must also place a huge emphasis on "cast" because every single actor and actress involved in this production were tailor made to play these characters. I couldn't think of anyone else in these roles after the credits rolled. Columbus' direction is also excellent; painting a picture of contrasting lights and shadows that clash to create a warm and welcoming picture quality. This is a film that continues to stay in my memory long after it is over because it excels at creating a believable fantasy world and characters. Luckily enough, sequels have followed to let us get more immersed into this world and the events that happen to the titular character. Congrats to the film crew as well as the author, J.K. Rowling.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

JanieGotAGunMay 31, 2021

A Really great movie!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

pur__0_0__May 8, 2021

I think I may sound like a stooge if I say this, but it is now that I have finally watched this movie. Throughout my life - school days, college, internet; I often used to see people going non-stop about Harry Potter (I think they are calledI think I may sound like a stooge if I say this, but it is now that I have finally watched this movie. Throughout my life - school days, college, internet; I often used to see people going non-stop about Harry Potter (I think they are called Potterheads). Harry Potter this, Harry Potter that. So finally yesterday I decided to give it a try and oh my god, it's amazing! Why didn't I see it back when I had the chance to?

It is kinda unbelieveable that such a nicely detailed CGI movie was released in 2001. I know the VFX had grown a lot better since Lord of the Rings trilogy was also made at the same time, but still I was not prepared for it. I was expecting it to be just some regular CGI that didn't age too well. Trust me, if you haven't watched the movie till now, it hasn't aged at all. It can very much still be the selling point of the movie.

I had watched some parts of the movie, like the beginning where Harry's cousin was brought back home after he fell in the snake's cage and the Quidditch scene, but I didn't have any powerful memory of any other scene from the movie. In the scene where Voldemort says to the professor, "Kill him!" somehow I used to remember that scene to be the teacher first saying "What should I do?" to which Voldemort replies that. And I'm glad I didn't have any previous memory of this movie, because that way I was able to experience everything for the first time.

This movie has the 2001 movie's vibe to it, where the story is very straightforward and the childish background music makes it seem very easy to understand. I haven't seen any other movie of the franchise, as I'm going to watch the next part after writing this review. But I hope it stays that way, since it's very easy to understand and thus I can watch the movie on my phone while doing my work on my laptop.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Gorbunov2004May 6, 2021

Очень прикольная задумка со школой волшебства! Я бы сам там с большим удовольствием учился!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

MaddoxWhiteApr 24, 2021

An amazing fantasy/mystery movie. Really good adaption of the books. Also Snape.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

geewahApr 21, 2021

Arguably the worst of all the Harry Potter movies.
It does play it safe when with it's source material it should of expanded our imagination a bit more, especially with a two and a half hour runtime.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

sebastianaliMar 24, 2021

Harry Potter y la Piedra Filosofal presenta un universo único, bastante interesante y que presenta conceptos que serian explotados posiblemente a futuro, sin embargo, hay muchas cosas que quedan sin quedar muy claras ya sea porque no seHarry Potter y la Piedra Filosofal presenta un universo único, bastante interesante y que presenta conceptos que serian explotados posiblemente a futuro, sin embargo, hay muchas cosas que quedan sin quedar muy claras ya sea porque no se explotan lo suficiente o directamente no se cuentan y para durar 2 horas y media esta muy desaprovechado. Ademas siento que Harry esta muy OP durante toda la película. Si, se que es el hijo de un hechicero, pero aun así, convenientemente resuelve situaciones difíciles como si nada. De la nada el derrota a Voldemort y nunca se sabe como lo hizo.
Lo que si destaco son los escenarios, representan muy bien lo que quiere ser, aunque eso si, los efectos especiales no han envejecido tan bien.
En resumen, una buena película e interesante, pero creo que esta lejos de ser una obra maestra al contrario de lo que muchos dicen.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

DaniortegaofMar 6, 2021

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. An amazing movie with an amazing cast!! Love it!! Would recommend 100% best movie I’ve ever watched!… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

9

gracjanskiFeb 28, 2021

There are plenty creative ideas in the movie and the fantasy world of Hagwort looks also great. The story is good, because it is interesting to discover this fantasy world and it has even some twists. The visual effects are top, you can enjoyThere are plenty creative ideas in the movie and the fantasy world of Hagwort looks also great. The story is good, because it is interesting to discover this fantasy world and it has even some twists. The visual effects are top, you can enjoy them even today.
The problem is of course, that kids are in the centre of the movie and their acting is just average.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

MrPajamasSep 8, 2020

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone launched a huge saga and a wizard named Harry, who made Daniel Radcliff famous like nothing. An excellent story with an excellent Hogwarts atmosphere, which looks absolutely luxurious, despite the factHarry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone launched a huge saga and a wizard named Harry, who made Daniel Radcliff famous like nothing. An excellent story with an excellent Hogwarts atmosphere, which looks absolutely luxurious, despite the fact that it is a film from 2001. Incredible effects for that time. The negative is also excellent and overall it is an excellent fantasy that you should not miss.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

KelvinSelimorFeb 9, 2021

Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone. The beginning of the story of the boy who survived. This is the most magical and interesting film. The actors fit perfectly into their characters. And the music is just great!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

iCampoRamilJan 2, 2021

El comienzo de una de las sagas más míticas de la historia del cine, y también de la historia de las novelas. Pero estamos aquí para hablar de películas y no de libros.
Para acabar con esta asociación a los libros, me gustaría decir que laEl comienzo de una de las sagas más míticas de la historia del cine, y también de la historia de las novelas. Pero estamos aquí para hablar de películas y no de libros.
Para acabar con esta asociación a los libros, me gustaría decir que la película es bastante fiel a la novela, pero eso no interviene en mi crítica, me baso solamente en la pantalla.
Empieza con muchas analogías a películas antiguas, clásicas de magia, y me da muy buena vibra, aunque al mismo tiempo, me da la sensación de recurrir a lo fácil y a lo comercial solo para gustar.
En lo primero que me fijé fue la banda sonora, John Williams está espectacular, es una maravilla, y suena durante toda la película, con las diferentes composiciones para que vayas cogiendo ese aire de familiaridad con la película y con los diferentes escenarios y secuencias, una maravilla.
Luego, lo que más resalta, es la paleta de colores, qué belleza visual, evidentemente, una película dirigida a un público infantil, con ciertos matices para los adultos, pero aún así, con esos tonos cálidos y suaves.
Hablando de lo infantil, a veces peca de ello, la construcción del villano es bastante maníquea, en plan, hay un bien y un mal, no hay más, y peca mucho de eso, su punto siniestro le da un puntazo, pero está demasiado medido para el público infantil, además, que las actuaciones de los niños no me convencen del todo, pese a tener un casting brutal, los mejores actores, mal aprovechados, como Alan Rickman.
Los chromas y los efectos especiales han envejecido un poquillo mal, se nota en ciertos puntos, y su revisión no la recomiendo demasiado, una vez que ya has entrado en ese mundo mágico, que ya has descubierto como funciona todo con el primer visionado, el segundo, se hace muy pesado, sobre todo por la narrativa lenta y su duración, bastante larga.
Un poco es eso, me centraría en lo visual, la banda sonora y el casting, aunque lo desaprovechan, y lo que no me gustó tanto fue la duración y la construcción en general, pero sobre todo del villano, aún así, si no la has visto, muuy recomendada.… Expand

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

1

HarryPotterSuckNov 27, 2020

Harry Potter sucks..........................................................

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

Mikibruno02Nov 8, 2020

Sweet, childish and ... for adults. Yes, this is my opinion, it is a film for children because it is magical, but that magic manages to make even adults become children again. John Williams does a "magical" job, an adjective that I will oftenSweet, childish and ... for adults. Yes, this is my opinion, it is a film for children because it is magical, but that magic manages to make even adults become children again. John Williams does a "magical" job, an adjective that I will often use in my analysis. The first film starring Daniel Radcliffe boasts a cast composed of, to name a few, Alan Rickman, Richard Harris, Maggie Smith ... exceptional. The plot, like that of the book, is well curated and adapted to a mistral script. No flaw except, perhaps, that of having remained a faithful film and that has not, how to say, made the big leap, yet it is epic despite its magical normality. Rating: 8 (would be 8.5)… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

ThejodjeremieNov 5, 2020

For me the movie was a nice beginning to the franchise but it was slow at parts. The special effects a fine for the time it came out but looked a little weird at parts. The actors all did great.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Cementer200Sep 27, 2020

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone is a good movie. it's a faithful adaption of JK Rowling book with the same name.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

RobwinzJul 31, 2020

A great start with an amazing cast, great memorable characters, funny moments, a pretty decent plot, a great quidditch scene, a well built up villain, some cheesy effects, the final fight scene is honestly class and the movie's got aA great start with an amazing cast, great memorable characters, funny moments, a pretty decent plot, a great quidditch scene, a well built up villain, some cheesy effects, the final fight scene is honestly class and the movie's got a beautiful score from the man himself John Williams.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

IAmaMovieGeekMay 28, 2020

Chris Columbus brought us the first Harry Potter film and it was fantastic! Great cast, and nice story. A+

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Movie_FreakMay 10, 2020

Good movie. On the bright side, the sets are great, fabulous special effects, the performance of the young cast is really good, and it has a truly mesmerizing score. The film does whisk you away on a beautifully made adventure, and has theGood movie. On the bright side, the sets are great, fabulous special effects, the performance of the young cast is really good, and it has a truly mesmerizing score. The film does whisk you away on a beautifully made adventure, and has the charm of the fantastic book. But it seems like Chris Colombus failed to make anything really better than the book, with the faithful approach being meddled by too many plot lines and shabby dialogue, does make it seem that this was only meant for children. The follow-ups were better… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

Mitya64Apr 22, 2020

Первый фильм в серии самой популярной фентези.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

Ryo91Apr 17, 2020

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hier hat alles angefangen. 9/10 * :-)

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

1

BroyaxApr 15, 2020

Ah le fameux Harry Potter ! j'en avais jamais vu un seul... alors comme ils passaient le tout premier à la télé, je l'ai enregistré. Et j'ai bien fait ! J'ai bien fait parce que sinon j'aurais pas pu accélérer, surtout après le premier tiersAh le fameux Harry Potter ! j'en avais jamais vu un seul... alors comme ils passaient le tout premier à la télé, je l'ai enregistré. Et j'ai bien fait ! J'ai bien fait parce que sinon j'aurais pas pu accélérer, surtout après le premier tiers grosso merdo -à moins que ce ne fût le premier quart seulement...

C'est que le bordel entier fait ses putains de deux plombes et demi, tu le crois ça ?... pas étonnant que primo ça n'avance pas... et que secundo, ça n'avance pas. Et tertio, ça ne raconte rien... ou si peu ? tout ça pour ça ?

Evidemment, je ne critique pas ce côté si enfantin, ominprésent, vu que c'est une mômerie pour les mômes masi tout de même... pourquoi aussi long, aussi lénifiant ? pauvres gamins, ils doivent ronfler au bout de 20 minutes...!

J'ai néanmoins trouvé amusant de comparer les bouilles respectives du petit Daniel et de la petite Emma... avec leurs tronches actuelles ! étonnant de constater que Daniel avait déjà sa trogne mais qu'Emma semble encore un bébé ici ! allez, rien que pour ça, j'accorde un... 1 !… Expand

1 of 2 users found this helpful11

All this user's reviews

10

Elizabeth2020Mar 29, 2020

The film was released when I was only six and I remember watching it in cinema, terrified by the last scene) memories

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

9

zNeverSleepingSep 14, 2019

Uma das melhores adaptações já feitas!

É impossível, para um fan, não se emocionar nesse filme. Se você leu o livro, sabe do que estou falando. A adaptação respeita a obra original e tenta ser fidedigna as possible. Inclusive, talvez esseUma das melhores adaptações já feitas!

É impossível, para um fan, não se emocionar nesse filme. Se você leu o livro, sabe do que estou falando. A adaptação respeita a obra original e tenta ser fidedigna as possible. Inclusive, talvez esse seja o filme mais fiel de toda a franquia.

A escolha dos atores foi certeira. Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson e Rupert Grint formam um trio com uma boa química que funciona. Fora o sotaque britânico que é de apaixonar. Também vale a menção a Richard Harris, que apesar de não ser meu Dumbledore favorito, definitivamente é o mais bem adaptado.

Em quesitos técnicos o filme se torna balanceado. Aqui temos uma OST fantástica, talvez uma das mais conhecidas do planeta terra - e não é por menos. Além de emocionante, marca uma grande presença no filme, que definitivamente não seria o mesmo sem. Quanto aos efeitos especiais, eles deixam a desejar - mesmo pra época -, mas em alguns casos, como na "projeção" de Hogwarts, é bem satisfatória. A duração do filme foi muito bem escolhida- não é muito longo a cansar e nem a ponto de se distanciar muito da obra original, mesmo que tenham cortado uma quantidade significativas de coisas do livro. Sendo assim, é obvio que o universo/atmosfera não é tão rica quanto a dos livros, mas isso alguma vez já foi possível?!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

2

FlipjeFeb 9, 2020

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Of all the films I have seen, this is the only one I walked out of the theatre on. Mind you, I have tried to be selective of many films and there have been bland ones I sat through, I found this piece of cinema back in 2001 absolutely cringe-worthy. I have not returned to it since but everything about it struck me as over-the-top, child wish fulfilment. J.K. Rowling's book turned to celluloid may have sold millions of tickets yet this is nothing more than a trite rehashing of the numerous collective tropes of the culture industry. Chosen one as orphan. Quirky side-kick. Bold and brash female friend. Obvious nemesis. Chosen one is adept at everything. Yawn after all the checkmarks are checked. This is pure fantasy and evokes nothing mature or three dimensional. Aesthetics of the film are modest while the main actors back then struck me as stilted and clunky in their delivery. The seasoned professionals, some Shakespearean actors stood out as moderately genuine and dedicated to their roles while the child actors motored along with unemotional delivery. But no, their ability to act was not the point. This whole venture was to make the audience not only relate to the character but long to be them. The Harry Potter books were marketed for a younger audience yet really they were blatent cash grabs, feeding on the fantasy of the uneducated. I admire someone like J.K.Rowling for her generosity and work with charity with her earnings yet she is guilty of arresting the development of an entire generation and this film is a contination of that. There is nothing edifying here and when the scene in the film where Ron wants to sacrifice himself for Harry over the perilous game of chess, I had it. "Harry, it's you who has to go on." Barf. Mental food poisoning. This is tripe dressed up. Digest at your own peril.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

manningn15Dec 27, 2018

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This is my 7th favorite Harry Potter movie. The performances from the cast were stupendous especially Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Robbie Coltrane, Alan Rickman, Richard Griffiths, Fiona Shaw, Maggie Smith, and Ian Hart and the voice over performance from Leslie Phillips as the Sorting Hat was great. The visual effects were gorgeously done especially during the Quidditch game and the three-headed dog fluffy. The scenery and sets were well done and really cool looking. The writing, story and screenplay were fantastically done. All of the costumes were very nice. The filming of the movie was great. Also the film score was amazing.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

KalabalaOct 26, 2019

i'm a huge fan of harry potter series and it's just the story and the characters who made this movie just awesome

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Jaredc324Jul 18, 2019

Both deeply enriching and wondrously enchanting. Chris Columbus puts the "m" in magic and makes Harry Potter the introductory chapter it needs to be and more.

3 of 3 users found this helpful30

All this user's reviews

9

JPKJun 14, 2019

Very Good Start
Philosopher’s Stone proves that you can adapt a book and massively succeed.

2 of 2 users found this helpful20

All this user's reviews

1

egoBorderApr 28, 2019

I guess it shouldn't be surprising considering the source material, but this movie is dull to a criminal degree. It's hard to believe they couldn't find better child actors for the lead roles, but come prepared to cringe hard at theI guess it shouldn't be surprising considering the source material, but this movie is dull to a criminal degree. It's hard to believe they couldn't find better child actors for the lead roles, but come prepared to cringe hard at the performances here. I guess Potter fans will accept this since liking the books is like admitting you have no taste… Expand

0 of 3 users found this helpful03

All this user's reviews

8

TomtagApr 14, 2019

Harry Potter's first movie gave us a great ibtroduction to wizards, magic and of course, Hogwarts. Its magic made it one of the best of the franchise

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

TyranianApr 9, 2019

This first Potter film is pretty decent with good acting and effects but the story has more holes than swiss cheese.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

sashmanMar 4, 2019

A great start to the Harry Potter Series! If you are new to this series you must start from the first one because a lot is explained. Each movie gets progressively gorier and more challenging for the characters. It is like you are transportedA great start to the Harry Potter Series! If you are new to this series you must start from the first one because a lot is explained. Each movie gets progressively gorier and more challenging for the characters. It is like you are transported to another world!… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

silbakkerJan 17, 2019

It does get boring after rewatching a lot of times, but this is easily the best children's movie ever!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

cameronhalmansJan 9, 2019

The Sorcerers Stone is just decent. Plagued with eh performances and boring direction. 55/100

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

Memelord118Dec 23, 2018

The movie was good but they cut out some stuff from the book. The acting was good and the environment was stellar.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

SaythatDec 8, 2018

All parts of this series are wonderful example how to follow the book closely and still keep the film intriguing. Children act okay and gradually improve to great, special effects are not only great, they are even harmonious. Total success inAll parts of this series are wonderful example how to follow the book closely and still keep the film intriguing. Children act okay and gradually improve to great, special effects are not only great, they are even harmonious. Total success in my opinion.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

MaxPayneIsGodNov 18, 2018

An enjoyable, family friendly fantasy movie for audiences young and old. Pretty solid performances by new-comers and industry veterans alike. Looking forward to watching how Harry's story unfolds.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Jk9785Nov 11, 2018

Though it kicked off the Harry Potter franchise, I can't help but feel a little underwhelmed by Chris Columbus' first entry in this franchise. Though the acting is great and it is faithful to JK Rowling's great novel, the film is just okay.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

7

eva3si0nOct 22, 2018

This movie beginning of one of the most known and cult film franchizes. And though the first movie about Harry Potter looks too children's and simple, he has begun a series. The plot of the movie as well as book is simple, but as it was fineThis movie beginning of one of the most known and cult film franchizes. And though the first movie about Harry Potter looks too children's and simple, he has begun a series. The plot of the movie as well as book is simple, but as it was fine to watch it for the first time.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

NameOfAccountSep 9, 2018

Gender-flipped remake of the old 'Worst Witch' children's series that's a little too "epic" for its own good. Stick with the originals; far more charm (and the film version features a delightfully absurd Tim Curry musical number). To Ms.Gender-flipped remake of the old 'Worst Witch' children's series that's a little too "epic" for its own good. Stick with the originals; far more charm (and the film version features a delightfully absurd Tim Curry musical number). To Ms. Rowling: What was wrong with the female protagonist? So-so Saturday night family viewing.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

rn42594Jun 25, 2018

This film does the book great justice. As we all know, books can't be directly translated to film, and this film is well translated. It stays true to the book for the most part, and the cast, along with the visuals, were incredible for 2001.This film does the book great justice. As we all know, books can't be directly translated to film, and this film is well translated. It stays true to the book for the most part, and the cast, along with the visuals, were incredible for 2001. I was just as captivated by this movie as I was for the books.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

bennewmanApr 19, 2018

Harry Potter is my favirote movie/ book franchise of all time and this is awesome
pro: almost everything
Con: cgi and to much expostiton but who cares Its HARRY POTTER

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

merijnjFeb 21, 2018

(84/100)
A fun setup to the franchise. CGI was a bit dodgy sometimes, but it is 2001 so I didn't expect much. Dialogue was also a bit dodgy.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

9

FilipeNetoFeb 12, 2018

Faithful to the book.

This film is an adaptation of the first book of Harry Potter's saga, written by the British author J.K. Rowling. Directed by Chris Columbus, a man with experience in making films for young audiences ("Home Alone" isFaithful to the book.

This film is an adaptation of the first book of Harry Potter's saga, written by the British author J.K. Rowling. Directed by Chris Columbus, a man with experience in making films for young audiences ("Home Alone" is paradigmatic), this film has a very young cast led by Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint and Emma Watson, in the roles of the apprentices wizards Harry Potter, Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger, while also features veterans actors of the British theater and cinema, as Richard Harris (in one of his last appearances in movies before his death), Maggie Smith and Robbie Coltrane, in the roles of Professor Dumbledore, school's headmaster, his main collaborator, Professor McGonagall and the school's gamekeeper, Hagrid.

This film marks the start of one of the most acclaimed and profitable franchises in the twenty-first century cinema, where several acting careers met its beginning or end. The film practically doesn't have a single negative note: he managed to pick up a book that was already a huge success and amplify it astronomically without sacrificing its authenticity. Anyone who has read the book recognizes it in this film and sees the book's magic gaining life, body and shape. The special effects, the details of the scenario, the costumes (any similarity between the school robes and the traditional black cloaks of university students of Portugal is not a mere coincidence, since Rowling lived in Portugal and has even married a Portuguese) all contribute to make us feel that this movie is the book we read and we have on our hands. Phenomenal, one of the best adaptations of a novel.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

6

mrdr4gonFeb 10, 2018

While dragged down by some conspicuous child acting and iffy writing, the first of the Harry Potter films is a decent enough family viewing experience.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

SrPepeJan 3, 2018

El comienzo de uno de los viajes más increíbles y una saga hermosa. Muy buena película.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

spacebear1Dec 11, 2017

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone is a film that I have loved since the first time I saw it. All of the casting is absolutely perfect. This film is also very lighthearted compared to how the series progresses. The villain, Professor Quirrell is a great first villain. My only real complaints are that the acting doesn't work in some parts but the acting is nowhere near bad and some of the special effects are a little dated. In the end, this is a great first installment and my rating is 8.7/10… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

puppylover527Dec 1, 2017

Harry Potter is definitely worth reading and then watching. There are so many twist and turns that just keep you on your feet! The magic fantasy world is so creative and well thought out; you just wish you could live in that world. SometimesHarry Potter is definitely worth reading and then watching. There are so many twist and turns that just keep you on your feet! The magic fantasy world is so creative and well thought out; you just wish you could live in that world. Sometimes when you're reading the book or watching the movie, you feel like you are right there with them. The storyline and plot is amazing. The personalities of the characters in the book are almost identical to them in the movie with maybe a few mishaps here and there. One piece of advice: read the book before watching the movie. If you don't, the movies can get a little confusing, and you might get frustrated with the lack of detail. But, all in all, it is definitely worth your time to get hooked in this thrilling book and movie series.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

inaneswineNov 14, 2017

So it's the one that started it all - also known as "the one you can't really criticise because it started it all". In other words, it makes me feel awful to have to say something negative about what is a good start to possibly the greatestSo it's the one that started it all - also known as "the one you can't really criticise because it started it all". In other words, it makes me feel awful to have to say something negative about what is a good start to possibly the greatest film franchise of all time. But I want to be objective. So, I'll try to just get the negatives out the way firstly and quickly: the film definitely has not aged well. Its PS2-worthy graphics are sometimes laughable, particularly in the troll and Quidditch sequences. In addition, the film sometimes struggles to cram everything into the short space it has - for example, that the first act with the Dursleys is so short is both a curse and a blessing: we don't get to experience the nitty-gritty early years of abuse suffered by Harry that is so well documented in the books - but on the other hand, it just means we get to the magic of Hogwarts so much faster. And finally, on a negative point, its decidedly light and almost twee tone makes it very much child-friendly, but may cause the adults to lose interest now and then. I'm sorry, but these things had to be said.

But let's face it - who cares? To anyone who's never seen or read Harry Potter before, this is the compulsory stepping stone in what turns out to be a most magnificent journey. So brilliantly crafted by Columbus and of course Rowling, Philosopher's Stone features some of the best acting talent Britain has to offer - special mentions going to Maggie Smith, Robbie Coltrane, the late Richard Harris and, in particular, Alan Rickman as Snape - the role he was born to play. The sets depict almost exactly what any reader has ever imagined, and the kids - well - they're pretty bloody cute.

Philosopher's Stone is not the best - it's just a taste test. What happens next is delicious.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

gDec 23, 2016

A childhood classic film I grew up watching when it opened in cinemas of Britain in late 2001 right before Fellowship of the Ring, maybe a month later, both interesting fantasy stories. First instalments that concentrates on meetingA childhood classic film I grew up watching when it opened in cinemas of Britain in late 2001 right before Fellowship of the Ring, maybe a month later, both interesting fantasy stories. First instalments that concentrates on meeting characters for the first time and the whole story. My childhood favourites.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

SpangleJul 2, 2017

Having not seen any Harry Potter in its entirety, it seemed that it was finally time to embark upon this franchise that dominated the childhood of many of my peers. Until today, the only time I had seen any portion of a Harry Potter film was,Having not seen any Harry Potter in its entirety, it seemed that it was finally time to embark upon this franchise that dominated the childhood of many of my peers. Until today, the only time I had seen any portion of a Harry Potter film was, I believe, this film in the car of a friend that had a dvd player in their parents car. It absolutely terrified me, rendering this a franchise that would get put off for a long time. Add in some parental worry regarding the depiction of witchcraft and it was obvious that this was not a franchise I would see as a child. As an adult, however, this became an inevitability and, well, the time has come. In this first entry into the series, The Sorcerer's Store is a Spielbergian film with a great sense of wonder, magic, and a child-like view of the world in which it inhabits that makes it a true expression of childish glee and joy, even when it can become quite cheesy and a bit hokey.

Those cheesy and hokey bits come at a few moments that can certainly be pin-pointed at the real lowlights of the film. The first is the Quidditch sequence. In 2001, the special effects in that scene were bad and they are somehow even worse in 2017. The flying as a whole is often quite rough, but the prolonged Quidditch scene is the most obvious portion that really fails to live up to expectations, especially because it is so long. Another bit that was a bit cheesy and cliche is the first act of the film. With young Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) dumped with his aunt and uncle after the death of his parents, he is constantly emotionally abused by his family with them constantly favoring their own son, Dudley. The exaggerated and cringy behavior of the family really never lands. It makes the audience hate the aunt and uncle, as they should, but it feels inauthentic and derived from a child's hyperbolic belief of how his guardians raise him, except it is all true. Overwrought and an entirely cliche way to introduce us to this magical world of wizardy, the opening is a rather pedestrian start to the beloved franchise. Finally, the ending is similarly pedestrian with the House of Gryffindor coming from behind after some last minute point additions. It is too much like a classic sports movie with the cliche of the protagonist team always snatching victory out of the jaws of defeat at the hands of the enemy - House of Slytherin, which includes Draco Malfoy (Tom Felton) and is led by Snape (Alan Rickman) - to really work. It is too happy and cheerful for a film that had already ended happily. Letting Gryffindor lose in the first year would have been a nice touch, as it gives them room to grow even in the game of Quidditch and not just as wizards.

Aside from those issues, however, it is hard to rely find fault in the first foray into the world of Hogwarts and magic. Potter is a modern icon for a reason: his story is damn captivating. With a Spielbergian sense of wonder - just see Hagrid (Robbie Coltrane) ride in on a bike akin to E.T. for how Spielbergian it becomes - The Sorcerer's Stone always delivers the goods. It delves into this world of wizardy just enough without ever diving into full-on exposition, instead it sprinkles in mythology every so often to really wet your palette. The refusal to divulge every secret of this world really keeps you hooked in and aching for the next installment to the series in order for more of those questions to be answered and more magical doors unlocked.

What makes the film so undeniably charming, however, has to be the cast. With young Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint, leading the way, this deeply British cast always makes the film incredibly appealing. Though child actors, the trio of young leads strike the right balance between childish earnestness and strong acting. They retain that confused innocence of their situation - especially Radcliffe throughout, particularly before he gets to Hogwarts - without ever letting their performances devolve into truly annoying childhood roles. Alongside them, the reliable cast of elders deliver excellent performances. John Hurt is delightful in a brief appearance as the wand salesman. Maggie Smith nails her role as the headmistress, really possessing the right look and demeanor for a nice, but expectant headmistress. Richard Harris is lightly used as Dumbledore, but nonetheless a positive and friendly presence. However, nobody really nails their role like Alan Rickman. Reserved, cold, calculating, and menacing, he plays Snape like a villain and makes Harry's confusion regarding Snape's intentions all the more believable. Whenever on screen, Rickman steals the show.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

SonicHD7May 31, 2017

Adaptation of the first of J.K. Rowling's popular children's novels about Harry Potter, a boy who learns on his eleventh birthday that he is the orphaned son of two powerful wizards and possesses unique magical powers of his own. He isAdaptation of the first of J.K. Rowling's popular children's novels about Harry Potter, a boy who learns on his eleventh birthday that he is the orphaned son of two powerful wizards and possesses unique magical powers of his own. He is summoned from his life as an unwanted child to become a student at Hogwarts, an English boarding school for wizards. There, he meets several friends who become his closest allies and help him discover the truth about his parents' mysterious deaths.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

4

FuturedirectorApr 12, 2017

A well-chosen cast and a strong script are wasted during a sorry attempt at saving this overrated flawed-storytelling and full-of-excessive-characters adventure that mostly only childish viewers can take as "unforgettable".

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

HPFANBOY1237Apr 9, 2017

The movie is slow at times and the direction is bland, but it is also so exciting and so much fun at the same time. By far the most book adaption of the movies, a must see!

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

SomePersonaJan 24, 2017

This movie is a breeze from its cold beginning to its warm, crisp end. Its characters are great, and the actors make them better. It is also better than its original source material.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

alejandro970Dec 24, 2016

The fortunate beginning of the J.K.Rowling beloved saga. Harris, Rickman and Smith wears well in the roles; the adapatation is faithful to book, with several winks to Dickens and Agatha Christie. May be a good gift for Xmas or a birthday.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

0

BeacherwahwahOct 21, 2016

Just watched this and it sucks hard! Horrible CGI effects, horrible acting from the youths (apart from Harry who was okay)....utterly charmless. I did like John Williams score though.

1 of 12 users found this helpful111

All this user's reviews

7

TheApplegnomeSep 13, 2016

A truly magical journey of mystery -- both characters and the basic premise is cleverly hidden behind this warm & happy character-diverse world. Well chosen actors and natural chemistry is a gigantic plus -- meanwhile a too simplistic andA truly magical journey of mystery -- both characters and the basic premise is cleverly hidden behind this warm & happy character-diverse world. Well chosen actors and natural chemistry is a gigantic plus -- meanwhile a too simplistic and slow story might bring it a but further down. Its far-stretched and slowly developed plot, but a happy one; is a wonder to follow. Add the never ending parallels with childhood & the struggles of being young and to grow up -- with a touching and never-forgetting score by Williams. It’s a classic first (but not flawless) entry.

Personal rating: 79/100
Critical rating: 77/100… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

BarneyOnMTSep 10, 2016

WHAT I LIKED: The first Harry Potter film was a success because, like most good franchise starters, it set up a world and a group of characters extremely well. This is not only thanks to the source material, but also the film's faithfulnessWHAT I LIKED: The first Harry Potter film was a success because, like most good franchise starters, it set up a world and a group of characters extremely well. This is not only thanks to the source material, but also the film's faithfulness to it, and the cast that backs it all up.
WHAT I DIDN'T LIKE: Also like most franchise starters, it fails rather dramatically in some story departments. Instead of a compelling sequence of events, we're left with a group of magical obstacle courses where the stakes seem somewhat forced and the reasoning is weak - even for my small brain.
VERDICT: It was a good start, but the franchise hadn't really got going yet at this point.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

8

reviewfrom19842Sep 5, 2016

A great first movie. Percent tone thought out the movies it a good started to the movies. All the charters are likeable and the story and source are pretty good.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

MrMovieBuffAug 22, 2016

A young boy's lonely life is turned around when he discovers that he is a wizard in "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone", a story written by J.K. Rowling and adapted onto the big screen.

Daniel Radcliffe plays the title character, HarryA young boy's lonely life is turned around when he discovers that he is a wizard in "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone", a story written by J.K. Rowling and adapted onto the big screen.

Daniel Radcliffe plays the title character, Harry Potter, who, as a baby, was left to be looked after by his aunt and uncle, along with his raging cousin, and they all mistreat him for years of his life.

Not long after Harry turns 11, a strange, huge and hairy man who goes by the name "Hagrid" (Robbie Coltrane) informs Harry that he is a wizard, and that his parents were exceptional students at a school named "Hogwarts", where gifted, magical youngsters are able to use their spells to their very best, and learn other new skills in regards to magic.

Harry begins to learn more about his past, such as the fate of his parents' death was caused a by a "Lord Voldermort", and how he managed to get the scar that is on his forehead.

Hagrid then decides to take Harry to the magical world of Diagon Alley, where Harry can purchase wands and broomsticks galore. After getting the essentials he needs, he then takes the train that leads directly to Hogwarts. It is there that he meets two other young students, Ron Weasley (Rupert Grint), and Hermione Granger (Emma Watson). He also comes across a very cynical young boy named Draco Malfoy (Tom Felton) who proves to be one not to be trusted.

The movie is filled with wonderful imagination, and a sense of strong, individual characters that many will choose to identify with. Director Chris Columbus ('Home Alone' and 'Mrs. Doubtfire') crafts an amazing magical adventure that is enchanting and thrilling all at the same time. The young actors do fine in their roles, although, there are some room for improvement, but they are young. The movie is also very well paced and should hold one's attention for longer than possible.

It is an excellent start to one of the most iconic franchises of all time. You wouldn't want to miss it.… Expand

0 of 2 users found this helpful02

All this user's reviews

6

JacobJul 30, 2016

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone will delight fans of the book with its mostly faithful adaptation hitting all the main points and representing the characters well especially the adult actors and others will no doubt be swept up by theHarry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone will delight fans of the book with its mostly faithful adaptation hitting all the main points and representing the characters well especially the adult actors and others will no doubt be swept up by the fantastic world Rowling has created and Columbus and crew have brought to life fully realized with special effects, score, and cinematography. With all that said though it doesn’t make for a coherent film. The director is so caught up in establishing the world and hitting all the necessary plot points that he forgets to flesh out the characters. Harry isn’t that interesting serving more as a vehicle to get exposition about the world and the transitions between scenes are jumpy with so much emphasis on hitting the main beats of the film that the story doesn’t flow. At 2 ½ hours the film can drag a tad. While the film is nothing great that doesn’t mean it isn’t a pleasure to watch. Seeing the story of Harry Potter come to life was and still is a major treat and considering how popular the books are/were the fact that it was done this well is impressive they gave the fans what they wanted. And when you consider all the failed attempts at starting a franchise seeing one succeed is magic.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Muskrat147Jul 14, 2016

Sticking tightly to its source material, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone is a great first entry into the massive fantasy of the franchise, boasting a brilliant score (by John Williams), impressive special effects, and a tense,Sticking tightly to its source material, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone is a great first entry into the massive fantasy of the franchise, boasting a brilliant score (by John Williams), impressive special effects, and a tense, action-packed story-line.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

10

imthenoobJun 16, 2016

The most loyal book to film adaption of the series. Everything is just spot on and there's truly not a single weak spot imo. It's just a wonderfully done movie that really brings the book to life.

0 of 1 users found this helpful01

All this user's reviews

8

Rutger-KikkertJun 5, 2016

For me my least favourite in the series. But it's still a good movie. It's just that it's more of a kids movie. I really like the darker tone the later movies were going for. This one is much more lighthearted. But my biggest concern withFor me my least favourite in the series. But it's still a good movie. It's just that it's more of a kids movie. I really like the darker tone the later movies were going for. This one is much more lighthearted. But my biggest concern with this movie is that it's not a focused movie. This movie is doing a great job introducing several things but while doing so it really forgets it's main plot with the sorcerer's stone. And that's why it really feels forced and weird when the movie focuses on that plot in the last half our of the movie. I also think younger kids won't understand all the stuff with the sorcerer's stone.
But still, it's not a bad movie. It's very entertaining, it's well written and looks good (even though the CGI really isn't all that great).… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

Aaron_WassermanMay 31, 2016

I read the Potter books, but I am not fanatic about them, that being said this movie is a solid adaption and started the Potter craze on the big screen. An enjoyable movie but not one that makes a lasting impression.

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

aadityamudharApr 17, 2016

Released in 2001, J.K. Rowling's international bestseller got its film adaptation here. While it must be admitted that it does have a nice charm to it, its sometimes lopsided pacing can break it off from the perfection it was so dramaticallyReleased in 2001, J.K. Rowling's international bestseller got its film adaptation here. While it must be admitted that it does have a nice charm to it, its sometimes lopsided pacing can break it off from the perfection it was so dramatically close to.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

koothrappaliFeb 1, 2016

A Pedra Filosofal é um marco de uma geração. Esse talvez seja o filme mais marcante de toda a franquia, pois é nele que que toda a jornada visual começa. Não é o melhor filme da franquia, mas é uma ótima introdução pra uma saga que no futuroA Pedra Filosofal é um marco de uma geração. Esse talvez seja o filme mais marcante de toda a franquia, pois é nele que que toda a jornada visual começa. Não é o melhor filme da franquia, mas é uma ótima introdução pra uma saga que no futuro evoluiu muito.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

7

hanneguacamoleJan 22, 2016

This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone had high expectations from the beginning – expectations from viewers who already loved the books and its intricate details. Such a viewer would be bound to notice the discrepancies and shortcomings which may affect overall enjoyment. But for a viewer simply watching The Sorcerer's Stone for the story and the entertainment may be in for a real treat.

The movie's strength is truly the story. Harry, Ron, and Hermione are a lovable trio that carries this enchanted world of wizardry to us Muggles in a way that we can only dream of being there. Hogwarts' enchantment is so spectacular that one may even forgive the movie for its, at times, incoherent and overly emotional plot. I will always love Harry Potter, but its best form is with every small detail showing through.

The soundtrack of this movie, however, was rather spectacular. Paired with graphics and scenery that shows wonders beyond our wildest dreams, this is where The Sorcerer's Stone wins. Marvelous details.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews

9

EpicLadySpongeJan 20, 2016

There's two different names for this movie.There's Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone and there's Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone. Even with the names being different, this movie is, without a doubt, the best start of the HarryThere's two different names for this movie.There's Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone and there's Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone. Even with the names being different, this movie is, without a doubt, the best start of the Harry Potter franchise.… Expand

0 of 0 users found this helpful00

All this user's reviews