Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
Warner Bros. Pictures | Release Date: November 16, 2001
7.8
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 1039 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
874
Mixed:
112
Negative:
53
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
8
HPFANBOY1237Apr 9, 2017
The movie is slow at times and the direction is bland, but it is also so exciting and so much fun at the same time. By far the most book adaption of the movies, a must see!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
SonicHD7May 31, 2017
Adaptation of the first of J.K. Rowling's popular children's novels about Harry Potter, a boy who learns on his eleventh birthday that he is the orphaned son of two powerful wizards and possesses unique magical powers of his own. He isAdaptation of the first of J.K. Rowling's popular children's novels about Harry Potter, a boy who learns on his eleventh birthday that he is the orphaned son of two powerful wizards and possesses unique magical powers of his own. He is summoned from his life as an unwanted child to become a student at Hogwarts, an English boarding school for wizards. There, he meets several friends who become his closest allies and help him discover the truth about his parents' mysterious deaths.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
spacebear1Dec 11, 2017
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone is a film that I have loved since the first time I saw it. All of the casting is absolutely perfect. This film is also very lighthearted compared to how the series progresses. The villain, Professor Quirrell is a great first villain. My only real complaints are that the acting doesn't work in some parts but the acting is nowhere near bad and some of the special effects are a little dated. In the end, this is a great first installment and my rating is 8.7/10… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
merijnjFeb 21, 2018
(84/100)
A fun setup to the franchise. CGI was a bit dodgy sometimes, but it is 2001 so I didn't expect much. Dialogue was also a bit dodgy.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
Mikibruno02Nov 8, 2020
Sweet, childish and ... for adults. Yes, this is my opinion, it is a film for children because it is magical, but that magic manages to make even adults become children again. John Williams does a "magical" job, an adjective that I will oftenSweet, childish and ... for adults. Yes, this is my opinion, it is a film for children because it is magical, but that magic manages to make even adults become children again. John Williams does a "magical" job, an adjective that I will often use in my analysis. The first film starring Daniel Radcliffe boasts a cast composed of, to name a few, Alan Rickman, Richard Harris, Maggie Smith ... exceptional. The plot, like that of the book, is well curated and adapted to a mistral script. No flaw except, perhaps, that of having remained a faithful film and that has not, how to say, made the big leap, yet it is epic despite its magical normality. Rating: 8 (would be 8.5)… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
silbakkerJan 17, 2019
It does get boring after rewatching a lot of times, but this is easily the best children's movie ever!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
TomtagApr 14, 2019
Harry Potter's first movie gave us a great ibtroduction to wizards, magic and of course, Hogwarts. Its magic made it one of the best of the franchise
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
glommanJan 15, 2022
I didn't grow up with either the Harry Potter books or movies, but I still very much enjoyed this one. Sure, it's aimed at a teenage/child audience and a lot of the quirks of the wizarding world seem very infantile and not well thought out toI didn't grow up with either the Harry Potter books or movies, but I still very much enjoyed this one. Sure, it's aimed at a teenage/child audience and a lot of the quirks of the wizarding world seem very infantile and not well thought out to an adult audience. But it's still a fun and heartwarming adventure about courage, friendship, and even self-sacrifice.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
RobwinzJul 31, 2020
A great start with an amazing cast, great memorable characters, funny moments, a pretty decent plot, a great quidditch scene, a well built up villain, some cheesy effects, the final fight scene is honestly class and the movie's got aA great start with an amazing cast, great memorable characters, funny moments, a pretty decent plot, a great quidditch scene, a well built up villain, some cheesy effects, the final fight scene is honestly class and the movie's got a beautiful score from the man himself John Williams.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
MrPajamasSep 8, 2020
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone launched a huge saga and a wizard named Harry, who made Daniel Radcliff famous like nothing. An excellent story with an excellent Hogwarts atmosphere, which looks absolutely luxurious, despite the factHarry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone launched a huge saga and a wizard named Harry, who made Daniel Radcliff famous like nothing. An excellent story with an excellent Hogwarts atmosphere, which looks absolutely luxurious, despite the fact that it is a film from 2001. Incredible effects for that time. The negative is also excellent and overall it is an excellent fantasy that you should not miss.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
adzcantillasNov 24, 2021
If throwback Who-Knows-When everyone's saying Witch Doctors are wishing a Discovery of an Elixir of Existence I'm like thinking going out a Modern Digital Age what if Cosmetic Medicine is pushing with knowing a Fountain of Youth. You knowIf throwback Who-Knows-When everyone's saying Witch Doctors are wishing a Discovery of an Elixir of Existence I'm like thinking going out a Modern Digital Age what if Cosmetic Medicine is pushing with knowing a Fountain of Youth. You know what? Everyone's just ending up with Death anyway knowing Body will Decay. Why not just go munching with Chocolates.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
JJ2FAS4UDec 29, 2021
----------------------------------8.4/10-----------------------------------
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
GemsicleDec 9, 2021
Director Chris Columbus is profound when it comes to him working with children such as Macaulay Culkin from Home Alone and the Hillard child actors from Mrs. Doubtfire, which is evident enough for him to be the most ethical to establish thisDirector Chris Columbus is profound when it comes to him working with children such as Macaulay Culkin from Home Alone and the Hillard child actors from Mrs. Doubtfire, which is evident enough for him to be the most ethical to establish this adapted franchise. Columbus works with children who all enroll at the same campus, which makes him feel very delighted about his job, however, eighty-five percent of them are just consultants while the other fifteen percent are names JK Rowling put in her novel.

Little Daniel Radcliffe plays the orphaned Harry Potter who has lived for a decade with his callous cousins, the Dursleys, who have an opposing opinion with Harry when it comes to magic. “Magic” is a word forbidden in the Dursleys' residence. When magic occurs during a scene, we get to sit back and relax and watch the aesthetic philosophy of the Harry Potter world while charming and triumphant music plays in the background by the one and only John Williams. Harry Potter’s name is prominent in his new world, especially by his peers, which makes him feel astonished and questioned when he is introduced. Rubeus Hagrid, who brings Harry into the throng of Muggles and out of it into the throng of witches and wizards, substantiates Harry’s life origins and blissfully compasses him through his wizarding orientations. This movie shows us what it is like for a fresh student to enter a new league in education, (for a former child celebrity that is). This league begins at the age of eleven, which is like a child prodigy skips secondary school and begins college posthaste. It is also enough time to earn credits in college and end it at the age of a typical high school student, only with a master’s degree if they desire. This is a film that is so full of joy and delight that these children are overwhelmed to be out of a reality school and finally ready to learn about their future. From my point of view, the magical campus, Hogwarts, is like a school that is way more difficult than getting into Harvard, because it is restricted only to people who can manipulate motion, and it was established many centuries prior to Harvard just by looking at its furniture and construction. If you are interested in art or any kind of fantasy, definitely check out this flick; it is an engaging, triumphant, extravagant, charming, and overall envisioned motion picture event.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Rdneck00May 9, 2022
This is my 5th favorite Harry Potter movie. I think its a great introduction to the franchise.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Manuel189qqOct 21, 2022
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Manuel89qqNov 7, 2022
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
elunicoazazelMay 29, 2023
It is true that it could be much better, and that important things from the books should have been included.

Nevertheless, it is a very good adaptation that opens the Harry Potter universe.

I will always have a special affection for this movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
AndrewN.Aug 11, 2007
Average but has its merits for remaining faithful to the book and giving a good insight into Harrys world.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
RuanH.Aug 12, 2007
It gets better with the second attempt, but does not quite capture me as much as I would like it to. The actors are becoming better in their roles, which leaves a big promise for the next installment.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
TomK.Aug 19, 2007
The film is fun very enjoyable, but it's not matching the book's environment as well, it's a little bit more childish than the books.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
Film_Fanatic_15Nov 22, 2010
The first installment of a great intriguing series from J.K. Rowling, becomes to be a dark and addictive fantasy film that makes you like Harry Potter. He finds out he is a wizard, and asks to stray from his evil step-parents to attend theThe first installment of a great intriguing series from J.K. Rowling, becomes to be a dark and addictive fantasy film that makes you like Harry Potter. He finds out he is a wizard, and asks to stray from his evil step-parents to attend the Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. More secrets about his close evil relationship with Lord Voldemort unveil and he cannot wait to meet him. The film in general was well directed, but the film lacks a sense of greatness. Despite it's PG rating, it has several instances of dark sequences of action that might frighten small children. The film's maturity should appeal to anyone who has read the book, but the instensity of the film could be more intense, but with a young cast and a PG rating, the direction and tone of the film is mild.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
7
TokyochuchuSep 23, 2012
The Sorcerer's Stone is a decent opener for the Harry Potter franchise. There is a lot of fun to be had discovering the world of Hogwarts. The film isn't perfect however; hefty over-length and an uneven final third keep it from joining theThe Sorcerer's Stone is a decent opener for the Harry Potter franchise. There is a lot of fun to be had discovering the world of Hogwarts. The film isn't perfect however; hefty over-length and an uneven final third keep it from joining the truly brilliant Potter outings.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
jimmytancrediMay 29, 2011
The lack of discernment between the boundaries by literature and the cinema compromises part of the movie, which seems oddly limited and unimaginative in a universe that is just the opposite. Chris Columbus, with a monstrous technicalThe lack of discernment between the boundaries by literature and the cinema compromises part of the movie, which seems oddly limited and unimaginative in a universe that is just the opposite. Chris Columbus, with a monstrous technical department, prepares the magical world beautifully, however fills the air. The scenes seem a succession of sketches made strategically to put the narrative in motion, without any soul or your driving style. The soundtrack by John Williams, however, besides having a theme already unforgettable simply creates beside the photograph the whole mood and atmosphere of Hogwarts. As a product, is a beautiful film and well done, but it suffers from the absence of a different taste and own something that is only acquired later along the saga goes on.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
CRLJul 27, 2011
This was where one of the highest grossing and most critically acclaimed series began, with a somewhat humble adaptation of J.K. Rowling's bestseller. These actors back then were completely unknown, and though they weren't at the level theyThis was where one of the highest grossing and most critically acclaimed series began, with a somewhat humble adaptation of J.K. Rowling's bestseller. These actors back then were completely unknown, and though they weren't at the level they are now, they were still good enough for a movie that depended on a wonderful and well-represented story as well as some of the best directing of the series.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
moviesfanJul 24, 2011
SO The HP saga begins with the sorcerer stone. I started writing the reviews after the last movie come out so i really understand the all the films. So where i began the first movie was a good movie where you saw that harry has magical powersSO The HP saga begins with the sorcerer stone. I started writing the reviews after the last movie come out so i really understand the all the films. So where i began the first movie was a good movie where you saw that harry has magical powers and begins on hogwarts the school for wizardy. It was a spectacular movie with good specialeffects and good acting especially for the litle harry. But there a few minors in the first movie that was later be solved by other directors, professor dumbledore is much better in the next films than in the firts 2 and the old look at hogwarts does not fit in the movie, further is was a thrill and it was a good firts harry potter but not the best. so i give it an 7… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
JawsPapi87Aug 9, 2011
Even though this movie was eventually topped by almost all of the following films in the series, it is a modern classic and a very satisfying first chapter. There are also some stand-out adult performances that elevate this movie (Alan Rickman)
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
7
Bruce722Dec 30, 2012
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This was a really well done movie. I was really intrigued to see how well they would portray the book on film and I must say, they did a fantastic job. There were undoubtedly some major and minor differences but I felt almost all of these were perfectly fine. Obviously it's impossible to include every aspect but there were some things that I think they could've/should've done differently. For one, I understand you can't add everything and that some things might have to be changed in order to make the movie work but if that's the case, why add things that are completely unnecessary? For example, the moving stairs. As for the things taken out or changes, I have no problem with all of them, except one. In the end when they're making their way through the various challenges, they took out Snape's potion riddle. To me, that was the second most important and memorable challenge of them all behind the chess challenge. This would've only added another minute or two and should've been included in the movie. Nonetheless, this was a well done book-to-movie adaptation. The acting of some of the students left a little to be desired but it wasn't too bad and I've heard it improves as they, and the book/movies age.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
beingryanjudeAug 25, 2014
An enchanting debut to a magical series of films. You'll be transported into an exciting world that you'll learn to crave despite the resonating evil within it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
potatoes351Aug 14, 2012
We all know the story to Harry Potter. Orphan who has nothing turns into the greatest wizard of all time. The first film instalment sticks true to the original book and includes some good special effects but nothing that will stand out fromWe all know the story to Harry Potter. Orphan who has nothing turns into the greatest wizard of all time. The first film instalment sticks true to the original book and includes some good special effects but nothing that will stand out from anything but a kids film.… Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
7
charlieW24Feb 10, 2013
At times it does feel to family orientated and isn't as dark as you'd like, but the first in the 'Harry Potter' franchise is a fun mystery adventure that introduces us to the world of Hogwarts, while being a wonderfully magical adaptation ofAt times it does feel to family orientated and isn't as dark as you'd like, but the first in the 'Harry Potter' franchise is a fun mystery adventure that introduces us to the world of Hogwarts, while being a wonderfully magical adaptation of the classic J.K Rowling novels.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
SpangleJul 2, 2017
Having not seen any Harry Potter in its entirety, it seemed that it was finally time to embark upon this franchise that dominated the childhood of many of my peers. Until today, the only time I had seen any portion of a Harry Potter film was,Having not seen any Harry Potter in its entirety, it seemed that it was finally time to embark upon this franchise that dominated the childhood of many of my peers. Until today, the only time I had seen any portion of a Harry Potter film was, I believe, this film in the car of a friend that had a dvd player in their parents car. It absolutely terrified me, rendering this a franchise that would get put off for a long time. Add in some parental worry regarding the depiction of witchcraft and it was obvious that this was not a franchise I would see as a child. As an adult, however, this became an inevitability and, well, the time has come. In this first entry into the series, The Sorcerer's Store is a Spielbergian film with a great sense of wonder, magic, and a child-like view of the world in which it inhabits that makes it a true expression of childish glee and joy, even when it can become quite cheesy and a bit hokey.

Those cheesy and hokey bits come at a few moments that can certainly be pin-pointed at the real lowlights of the film. The first is the Quidditch sequence. In 2001, the special effects in that scene were bad and they are somehow even worse in 2017. The flying as a whole is often quite rough, but the prolonged Quidditch scene is the most obvious portion that really fails to live up to expectations, especially because it is so long. Another bit that was a bit cheesy and cliche is the first act of the film. With young Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) dumped with his aunt and uncle after the death of his parents, he is constantly emotionally abused by his family with them constantly favoring their own son, Dudley. The exaggerated and cringy behavior of the family really never lands. It makes the audience hate the aunt and uncle, as they should, but it feels inauthentic and derived from a child's hyperbolic belief of how his guardians raise him, except it is all true. Overwrought and an entirely cliche way to introduce us to this magical world of wizardy, the opening is a rather pedestrian start to the beloved franchise. Finally, the ending is similarly pedestrian with the House of Gryffindor coming from behind after some last minute point additions. It is too much like a classic sports movie with the cliche of the protagonist team always snatching victory out of the jaws of defeat at the hands of the enemy - House of Slytherin, which includes Draco Malfoy (Tom Felton) and is led by Snape (Alan Rickman) - to really work. It is too happy and cheerful for a film that had already ended happily. Letting Gryffindor lose in the first year would have been a nice touch, as it gives them room to grow even in the game of Quidditch and not just as wizards.

Aside from those issues, however, it is hard to rely find fault in the first foray into the world of Hogwarts and magic. Potter is a modern icon for a reason: his story is damn captivating. With a Spielbergian sense of wonder - just see Hagrid (Robbie Coltrane) ride in on a bike akin to E.T. for how Spielbergian it becomes - The Sorcerer's Stone always delivers the goods. It delves into this world of wizardy just enough without ever diving into full-on exposition, instead it sprinkles in mythology every so often to really wet your palette. The refusal to divulge every secret of this world really keeps you hooked in and aching for the next installment to the series in order for more of those questions to be answered and more magical doors unlocked.

What makes the film so undeniably charming, however, has to be the cast. With young Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint, leading the way, this deeply British cast always makes the film incredibly appealing. Though child actors, the trio of young leads strike the right balance between childish earnestness and strong acting. They retain that confused innocence of their situation - especially Radcliffe throughout, particularly before he gets to Hogwarts - without ever letting their performances devolve into truly annoying childhood roles. Alongside them, the reliable cast of elders deliver excellent performances. John Hurt is delightful in a brief appearance as the wand salesman. Maggie Smith nails her role as the headmistress, really possessing the right look and demeanor for a nice, but expectant headmistress. Richard Harris is lightly used as Dumbledore, but nonetheless a positive and friendly presence. However, nobody really nails their role like Alan Rickman. Reserved, cold, calculating, and menacing, he plays Snape like a villain and makes Harry's confusion regarding Snape's intentions all the more believable. Whenever on screen, Rickman steals the show.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
kbm1Oct 19, 2012
Released in 2001, J.K. Rowling's international bestseller got its film adaptation here. While it must be admitted that it does have a nice charm to it, its sometimes lopsided pacing can break it off from the perfection it was so dramaticallyReleased in 2001, J.K. Rowling's international bestseller got its film adaptation here. While it must be admitted that it does have a nice charm to it, its sometimes lopsided pacing can break it off from the perfection it was so dramatically close to.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
dante_finnAug 11, 2014
This is such a cool movie. With seeing the wizarding world and going to Hogwarts. The effects were also prettty sweet. Daniel Radcliffe did a good job woth potraying Harry Potter. The presentation to this film was dramatic which made meThis is such a cool movie. With seeing the wizarding world and going to Hogwarts. The effects were also prettty sweet. Daniel Radcliffe did a good job woth potraying Harry Potter. The presentation to this film was dramatic which made me prepared for the film. Looking back nowadays this is a classic in my opinion hat will never leave my childhood memory.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
FilmEqualsJoyNov 10, 2012
Such a magical film for kids everywhere. I remember seeing this for the first time when I was a kid. It was spellbinding. Every time I watch Sorcerer's Stone I still feel that old feeling of happiness, but HP1 is not as dark and gritty asSuch a magical film for kids everywhere. I remember seeing this for the first time when I was a kid. It was spellbinding. Every time I watch Sorcerer's Stone I still feel that old feeling of happiness, but HP1 is not as dark and gritty as later Harry Potter's that I believe to produce more emotional depth. Some people prefer this one and think it is the best one. What more could Potter fans ask for? This is a wonderful film to watch. It starts off a series in spectacular fashion.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
MetaGazJan 2, 2013
The main characters acted well for children. There were some boring parts, but overall, it was enjoyable. It had a bright point of view and a dark point of view. The background music was well conducted. Graphics were good for a movie made 12The main characters acted well for children. There were some boring parts, but overall, it was enjoyable. It had a bright point of view and a dark point of view. The background music was well conducted. Graphics were good for a movie made 12 years ago. But there were some parts that connected the seens in the book, while in the movie, there isn't some connecting scenes from one sceene to another, so people that didn't read the book and only watched the movie might be a little confused, but it was great, and I hope that they keep on developing, and make movies that get top scores.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
TrilobiteGAug 3, 2015
Not a bad start to one of the most successful franchises in history, mainly because it does so well with character introduction and development, but this movie gets slightly boring in a sense that they could show off so much more magic too itNot a bad start to one of the most successful franchises in history, mainly because it does so well with character introduction and development, but this movie gets slightly boring in a sense that they could show off so much more magic too it and go into more detail with the drusleys and more fantasy action in the third act. Pretty good movie… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
sil3nt_nickMar 24, 2013
Remarkably well acting by a group of eleven-year-old children who would eventually become superstars in the film world. Very strong effects for the early 21st century.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Movie1997Sep 8, 2013
Not only was it a great start to one of the most beloved book series/franchise of all time, it stayed loyal to the books and introduced children everywhere to a whole new breed of wizardry. Overall, this is the same guy who made "TheNot only was it a great start to one of the most beloved book series/franchise of all time, it stayed loyal to the books and introduced children everywhere to a whole new breed of wizardry. Overall, this is the same guy who made "The Lightening Thief"? Be sure to check out my YouTube channel "TheMovieManLife" for all things movies.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
TheApplegnomeSep 13, 2016
A truly magical journey of mystery -- both characters and the basic premise is cleverly hidden behind this warm & happy character-diverse world. Well chosen actors and natural chemistry is a gigantic plus -- meanwhile a too simplistic andA truly magical journey of mystery -- both characters and the basic premise is cleverly hidden behind this warm & happy character-diverse world. Well chosen actors and natural chemistry is a gigantic plus -- meanwhile a too simplistic and slow story might bring it a but further down. Its far-stretched and slowly developed plot, but a happy one; is a wonder to follow. Add the never ending parallels with childhood & the struggles of being young and to grow up -- with a touching and never-forgetting score by Williams. It’s a classic first (but not flawless) entry.

Personal rating: 79/100
Critical rating: 77/100… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
cag11Nov 30, 2013
Even though it was all kids, or for the most part, Chris Columbus did it pretty well this time in 'Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone'. It stayed really true to the book and had decent effect for its time.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
joao1198pedroNov 28, 2013
this is an good adaptation of the j.k. rowlling book wich defines a good start point for this franchise,it is not a so perfect movie.Unfortunately daniel redcliffe isn't a so good actor to make this rule.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
RayzorMooseNov 12, 2013
A spellbinding story of a young wizard that electrifies.
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone enchants audiences with a well forged script and impressive young actors.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
7
inaneswineNov 14, 2017
So it's the one that started it all - also known as "the one you can't really criticise because it started it all". In other words, it makes me feel awful to have to say something negative about what is a good start to possibly the greatestSo it's the one that started it all - also known as "the one you can't really criticise because it started it all". In other words, it makes me feel awful to have to say something negative about what is a good start to possibly the greatest film franchise of all time. But I want to be objective. So, I'll try to just get the negatives out the way firstly and quickly: the film definitely has not aged well. Its PS2-worthy graphics are sometimes laughable, particularly in the troll and Quidditch sequences. In addition, the film sometimes struggles to cram everything into the short space it has - for example, that the first act with the Dursleys is so short is both a curse and a blessing: we don't get to experience the nitty-gritty early years of abuse suffered by Harry that is so well documented in the books - but on the other hand, it just means we get to the magic of Hogwarts so much faster. And finally, on a negative point, its decidedly light and almost twee tone makes it very much child-friendly, but may cause the adults to lose interest now and then. I'm sorry, but these things had to be said.

But let's face it - who cares? To anyone who's never seen or read Harry Potter before, this is the compulsory stepping stone in what turns out to be a most magnificent journey. So brilliantly crafted by Columbus and of course Rowling, Philosopher's Stone features some of the best acting talent Britain has to offer - special mentions going to Maggie Smith, Robbie Coltrane, the late Richard Harris and, in particular, Alan Rickman as Snape - the role he was born to play. The sets depict almost exactly what any reader has ever imagined, and the kids - well - they're pretty bloody cute.

Philosopher's Stone is not the best - it's just a taste test. What happens next is delicious.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
NerdConsultantOct 26, 2014
this film is still pretty good and has a funner edge that a lot of the films from order of the Phoenix onwards didn't have but it's biggest problem is that as Il Neige pointed out the books weren't finished so no one knew what to highlightthis film is still pretty good and has a funner edge that a lot of the films from order of the Phoenix onwards didn't have but it's biggest problem is that as Il Neige pointed out the books weren't finished so no one knew what to highlight and what to cut but it has also got special effects that haven't aged well. still good movie and i can watch it and will recommend it… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
MovieManiac83Apr 23, 2015
To date, J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter books have sold more than 100 million copies, won mostly adulatory reviews, and inspired a fervent cult following, becoming one of those increasingly rare occasions in which the literary world has had anTo date, J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter books have sold more than 100 million copies, won mostly adulatory reviews, and inspired a fervent cult following, becoming one of those increasingly rare occasions in which the literary world has had an impact on popular culture. Much as a film adaptation was inevitable, it's almost a shame that Rowling's fantastical universe has been lifted off the page, co-opted from the imagination of millions of readers. And it's an even bigger shame that the chief imagineer is director Chris Columbus (Home Alone, Stepmom, Bicentennial Man), a Steven Spielberg protégé whose weakness for precocious brats and cynical button-pushing suggests that he learned all his lessons from Hook. Entrusted with the Potter franchise, Columbus was determined to stay faithful to the source, so if Harry Potter And The Sorcerer's Stone turns out to be his best film in a walk, it's a testament to the strength of Rowling's vision and the peerless cast that brings it to life. Working from a solid script by ace screenwriter Steve Kloves (Wonder Boys), Columbus fares best when he stays close to his wry, sweet-natured hero and tells the story through his bespectacled eyes. Defying an unhappy cinematic tradition of bowl-haired moppets, Daniel Radcliffe gives a modest and winning performance as Potter, an orphaned boy who has spent the last 10 years living under the stairs of his adoptive parents' house, unaware of his grand destiny. On his 11th birthday, Radcliffe gets whisked away by an affable giant (Robbie Coltrane) who acquaints him with his supernatural gifts and invites him to study at Hogwarts School Of Witchcraft And Wizardry. A magical castle surrounded by a black forest, Hogwarts is led by benevolent headmaster Richard Harris and a team of instructors (Maggie Smith, Ian Hart, and a wonderfully sinister Alan Rickman, among others) who teach students to cast spells, make potions, and master their broomsticks and magic wands. But Radcliffe and his two outcast friends (Rupert Grint and Emma Watson) face a larger challenge when they confront the wizard who killed his parents. A grab bag of storybook elements plucked from Tolkien, Dahl, and C.S. Lewis, Harry Potter gets off to a rousing start, as Rowling's hand-me-down universe opens up for its hero and seems fresh from his astonished perspective. But Columbus doesn't let a special effect pass without overdoing its sense of wonderment, as if the audience won't know to be awed unless he lays on a John Williams score with extra sprinkles. Harry Potter begins to lose its grip during an expensive-looking "Quidditch" match, a game that's like a cross between Rollerball and the pod race in The Phantom Menace, but is about as exciting as watching someone else play a video game. At 152 minutes, the film tries to squeeze in as much of the Rowling tome as possible, but the length grows more oppressive just as it should be gaining momentum for the finale. More Potter movies are in the pipeline, but the franchise seems exhausted halfway through the first.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
hanneguacamoleJan 22, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone had high expectations from the beginning – expectations from viewers who already loved the books and its intricate details. Such a viewer would be bound to notice the discrepancies and shortcomings which may affect overall enjoyment. But for a viewer simply watching The Sorcerer's Stone for the story and the entertainment may be in for a real treat.

The movie's strength is truly the story. Harry, Ron, and Hermione are a lovable trio that carries this enchanted world of wizardry to us Muggles in a way that we can only dream of being there. Hogwarts' enchantment is so spectacular that one may even forgive the movie for its, at times, incoherent and overly emotional plot. I will always love Harry Potter, but its best form is with every small detail showing through.

The soundtrack of this movie, however, was rather spectacular. Paired with graphics and scenery that shows wonders beyond our wildest dreams, this is where The Sorcerer's Stone wins. Marvelous details.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
aadityamudharApr 17, 2016
Released in 2001, J.K. Rowling's international bestseller got its film adaptation here. While it must be admitted that it does have a nice charm to it, its sometimes lopsided pacing can break it off from the perfection it was so dramaticallyReleased in 2001, J.K. Rowling's international bestseller got its film adaptation here. While it must be admitted that it does have a nice charm to it, its sometimes lopsided pacing can break it off from the perfection it was so dramatically close to.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
BarneyOnMTSep 10, 2016
WHAT I LIKED: The first Harry Potter film was a success because, like most good franchise starters, it set up a world and a group of characters extremely well. This is not only thanks to the source material, but also the film's faithfulnessWHAT I LIKED: The first Harry Potter film was a success because, like most good franchise starters, it set up a world and a group of characters extremely well. This is not only thanks to the source material, but also the film's faithfulness to it, and the cast that backs it all up.
WHAT I DIDN'T LIKE: Also like most franchise starters, it fails rather dramatically in some story departments. Instead of a compelling sequence of events, we're left with a group of magical obstacle courses where the stakes seem somewhat forced and the reasoning is weak - even for my small brain.
VERDICT: It was a good start, but the franchise hadn't really got going yet at this point.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Muskrat147Jul 14, 2016
Sticking tightly to its source material, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone is a great first entry into the massive fantasy of the franchise, boasting a brilliant score (by John Williams), impressive special effects, and a tense,Sticking tightly to its source material, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone is a great first entry into the massive fantasy of the franchise, boasting a brilliant score (by John Williams), impressive special effects, and a tense, action-packed story-line.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Aaron_WassermanMay 31, 2016
I read the Potter books, but I am not fanatic about them, that being said this movie is a solid adaption and started the Potter craze on the big screen. An enjoyable movie but not one that makes a lasting impression.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
gDec 23, 2016
A childhood classic film I grew up watching when it opened in cinemas of Britain in late 2001 right before Fellowship of the Ring, maybe a month later, both interesting fantasy stories. First instalments that concentrates on meetingA childhood classic film I grew up watching when it opened in cinemas of Britain in late 2001 right before Fellowship of the Ring, maybe a month later, both interesting fantasy stories. First instalments that concentrates on meeting characters for the first time and the whole story. My childhood favourites.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
eva3si0nOct 22, 2018
This movie beginning of one of the most known and cult film franchizes. And though the first movie about Harry Potter looks too children's and simple, he has begun a series. The plot of the movie as well as book is simple, but as it was fineThis movie beginning of one of the most known and cult film franchizes. And though the first movie about Harry Potter looks too children's and simple, he has begun a series. The plot of the movie as well as book is simple, but as it was fine to watch it for the first time.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Jk9785Nov 11, 2018
Though it kicked off the Harry Potter franchise, I can't help but feel a little underwhelmed by Chris Columbus' first entry in this franchise. Though the acting is great and it is faithful to JK Rowling's great novel, the film is just okay.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
Jaredc324Jul 18, 2019
Both deeply enriching and wondrously enchanting. Chris Columbus puts the "m" in magic and makes Harry Potter the introductory chapter it needs to be and more.
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
7
sebastianaliMar 24, 2021
Harry Potter y la Piedra Filosofal presenta un universo único, bastante interesante y que presenta conceptos que serian explotados posiblemente a futuro, sin embargo, hay muchas cosas que quedan sin quedar muy claras ya sea porque no seHarry Potter y la Piedra Filosofal presenta un universo único, bastante interesante y que presenta conceptos que serian explotados posiblemente a futuro, sin embargo, hay muchas cosas que quedan sin quedar muy claras ya sea porque no se explotan lo suficiente o directamente no se cuentan y para durar 2 horas y media esta muy desaprovechado. Ademas siento que Harry esta muy OP durante toda la película. Si, se que es el hijo de un hechicero, pero aun así, convenientemente resuelve situaciones difíciles como si nada. De la nada el derrota a Voldemort y nunca se sabe como lo hizo.
Lo que si destaco son los escenarios, representan muy bien lo que quiere ser, aunque eso si, los efectos especiales no han envejecido tan bien.
En resumen, una buena película e interesante, pero creo que esta lejos de ser una obra maestra al contrario de lo que muchos dicen.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
ThejodjeremieNov 5, 2020
For me the movie was a nice beginning to the franchise but it was slow at parts. The special effects a fine for the time it came out but looked a little weird at parts. The actors all did great.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Movie_FreakMay 10, 2020
Good movie. On the bright side, the sets are great, fabulous special effects, the performance of the young cast is really good, and it has a truly mesmerizing score. The film does whisk you away on a beautifully made adventure, and has theGood movie. On the bright side, the sets are great, fabulous special effects, the performance of the young cast is really good, and it has a truly mesmerizing score. The film does whisk you away on a beautifully made adventure, and has the charm of the fantastic book. But it seems like Chris Colombus failed to make anything really better than the book, with the faithful approach being meddled by too many plot lines and shabby dialogue, does make it seem that this was only meant for children. The follow-ups were better… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Cementer200Sep 27, 2020
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone is a good movie. it's a faithful adaption of JK Rowling book with the same name.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
iCampoRamilJan 2, 2021
El comienzo de una de las sagas más míticas de la historia del cine, y también de la historia de las novelas. Pero estamos aquí para hablar de películas y no de libros.
Para acabar con esta asociación a los libros, me gustaría decir que laEl comienzo de una de las sagas más míticas de la historia del cine, y también de la historia de las novelas. Pero estamos aquí para hablar de películas y no de libros.
Para acabar con esta asociación a los libros, me gustaría decir que la película es bastante fiel a la novela, pero eso no interviene en mi crítica, me baso solamente en la pantalla.
Empieza con muchas analogías a películas antiguas, clásicas de magia, y me da muy buena vibra, aunque al mismo tiempo, me da la sensación de recurrir a lo fácil y a lo comercial solo para gustar.
En lo primero que me fijé fue la banda sonora, John Williams está espectacular, es una maravilla, y suena durante toda la película, con las diferentes composiciones para que vayas cogiendo ese aire de familiaridad con la película y con los diferentes escenarios y secuencias, una maravilla.
Luego, lo que más resalta, es la paleta de colores, qué belleza visual, evidentemente, una película dirigida a un público infantil, con ciertos matices para los adultos, pero aún así, con esos tonos cálidos y suaves.
Hablando de lo infantil, a veces peca de ello, la construcción del villano es bastante maníquea, en plan, hay un bien y un mal, no hay más, y peca mucho de eso, su punto siniestro le da un puntazo, pero está demasiado medido para el público infantil, además, que las actuaciones de los niños no me convencen del todo, pese a tener un casting brutal, los mejores actores, mal aprovechados, como Alan Rickman.
Los chromas y los efectos especiales han envejecido un poquillo mal, se nota en ciertos puntos, y su revisión no la recomiendo demasiado, una vez que ya has entrado en ese mundo mágico, que ya has descubierto como funciona todo con el primer visionado, el segundo, se hace muy pesado, sobre todo por la narrativa lenta y su duración, bastante larga.
Un poco es eso, me centraría en lo visual, la banda sonora y el casting, aunque lo desaprovechan, y lo que no me gustó tanto fue la duración y la construcción en general, pero sobre todo del villano, aún así, si no la has visto, muuy recomendada.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
adeel12345678Mar 19, 2022
this movie is a classic. It's not as good as people say it is and it has all the bad things that people say it has, but still it's good. The CGI is outdated and the color grading is poor so don't expect much from the visuals because it's 2this movie is a classic. It's not as good as people say it is and it has all the bad things that people say it has, but still it's good. The CGI is outdated and the color grading is poor so don't expect much from the visuals because it's 2 decades old. The overall theme is highly childish for which I have mixed opinion. Director Chris Columbus directing style sometimes becomes annoying because he gave the movie a childish theme and it sometimes fits with the movie and sometimes not so well. I liked his style sometimes and sometimes, it wasn't bad, but, still, didn't fit.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Fixer84Mar 16, 2023
The first chapter of a global phenomenon of a generation. Looking back on it today it almost feels very nostalgic, but it's still great.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
JonLDec 15, 2007
Unlike the second one, does not show it's length, and with a fine cast and set design to keep things afloat, but slavishly workmanlike and deadening in it's writing and directing and with rather mediocre special effects in key scenes.
3 of 5 users found this helpful
6
JacobJul 30, 2016
Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone will delight fans of the book with its mostly faithful adaptation hitting all the main points and representing the characters well especially the adult actors and others will no doubt be swept up by theHarry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone will delight fans of the book with its mostly faithful adaptation hitting all the main points and representing the characters well especially the adult actors and others will no doubt be swept up by the fantastic world Rowling has created and Columbus and crew have brought to life fully realized with special effects, score, and cinematography. With all that said though it doesn’t make for a coherent film. The director is so caught up in establishing the world and hitting all the necessary plot points that he forgets to flesh out the characters. Harry isn’t that interesting serving more as a vehicle to get exposition about the world and the transitions between scenes are jumpy with so much emphasis on hitting the main beats of the film that the story doesn’t flow. At 2 ½ hours the film can drag a tad. While the film is nothing great that doesn’t mean it isn’t a pleasure to watch. Seeing the story of Harry Potter come to life was and still is a major treat and considering how popular the books are/were the fact that it was done this well is impressive they gave the fans what they wanted. And when you consider all the failed attempts at starting a franchise seeing one succeed is magic.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
asylumspadezNov 26, 2011
Wasnt as bad as I remembered. The older cast members were great and played their parts perfectly, The young cast was solid as well. The movie was decent and was as loyal to the book as it could be. However it lacked originality and the CGIWasnt as bad as I remembered. The older cast members were great and played their parts perfectly, The young cast was solid as well. The movie was decent and was as loyal to the book as it could be. However it lacked originality and the CGI wasnt that good either (The troll looked poorly done).… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
LetzTalkMoveezSep 18, 2011
The first in the highly lucrative wizard franchise is heavy on magic, low on character. The visuals are pretty dreadful, too. Still, it's a fun introduction to the Harry Potter mythology and boasts some great performances by the supporting cast.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
TyranianApr 9, 2019
This first Potter film is pretty decent with good acting and effects but the story has more holes than swiss cheese.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
spadenxDec 2, 2011
While it does a good job taking a bulk of the details from the book and putting it into film, The movie is pretty corny and rather childish (yes I know it's based off a childrens book). The acting is solid but I am a bit disapointed that theyWhile it does a good job taking a bulk of the details from the book and putting it into film, The movie is pretty corny and rather childish (yes I know it's based off a childrens book). The acting is solid but I am a bit disapointed that they didnt use their experianced older cast members more. It was enjoyable for the most part though.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
watithink123May 3, 2012
The first Harry Potter in the movie series of Harry Potter film's. The start had no interest for me at all. But after the troll scene it start's to get really good, but the start effects this movie in ,a big way. The middle and the end of theThe first Harry Potter in the movie series of Harry Potter film's. The start had no interest for me at all. But after the troll scene it start's to get really good, but the start effects this movie in ,a big way. The middle and the end of the film did it for me. Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone 6.9/10… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
jfrotylpe532Dec 21, 2012
Though it was a good start to the most sucessful trilogy of all time, I thought it was a little childish and not extremeley well written. Other than that the movie was a sucess.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
6
Annoymous1May 18, 2013
Close to the book but still entertains. Excitingly enough I thought it would be great though it fared lower than most of its sequels. Zeal needed but a total failure when it came to dialogue. But very good stuff.

Next Movie!
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
6
mrdr4gonFeb 10, 2018
While dragged down by some conspicuous child acting and iffy writing, the first of the Harry Potter films is a decent enough family viewing experience.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
cameronhalmansJan 9, 2019
The Sorcerers Stone is just decent. Plagued with eh performances and boring direction. 55/100
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
NameOfAccountSep 9, 2018
Gender-flipped remake of the old 'Worst Witch' children's series that's a little too "epic" for its own good. Stick with the originals; far more charm (and the film version features a delightfully absurd Tim Curry musical number). To Ms.Gender-flipped remake of the old 'Worst Witch' children's series that's a little too "epic" for its own good. Stick with the originals; far more charm (and the film version features a delightfully absurd Tim Curry musical number). To Ms. Rowling: What was wrong with the female protagonist? So-so Saturday night family viewing.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Memelord118Dec 23, 2018
The movie was good but they cut out some stuff from the book. The acting was good and the environment was stellar.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
geewahApr 21, 2021
Arguably the worst of all the Harry Potter movies.
It does play it safe when with it's source material it should of expanded our imagination a bit more, especially with a two and a half hour runtime.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
ItsRaininMenJul 25, 2013
The movie is honestly... overrated. There is far too much talking, and too many scenes where people aren't really doing much, with a few exciting scenes, and that's about it. Talking scenes are okay for books, but, for movies, I'd like to seeThe movie is honestly... overrated. There is far too much talking, and too many scenes where people aren't really doing much, with a few exciting scenes, and that's about it. Talking scenes are okay for books, but, for movies, I'd like to see a lot more. And, even though it's common for dramatic movies to have uncolorful lighting, for a world of magic, it sure looked a bit dull. Not very memorable.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
AaronWasserman2May 4, 2014
When I was a kid this was incredible. The imagination of the book put onto the screen...the desire to be at hogwarts. once your older the novelty wears off. And you see while this movie has alot of positives...it is not one of the better Potters
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
JmsbppJul 24, 2013
Tiene un buen contenido de algo que se desviaba a la brujeria cursi pero la pelicula es realmente es relmente aburrida y con nombres raros desde el principio
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
FuturedirectorApr 12, 2017
A well-chosen cast and a strong script are wasted during a sorry attempt at saving this overrated flawed-storytelling and full-of-excessive-characters adventure that mostly only childish viewers can take as "unforgettable".
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
JohnD.Jul 12, 2007
The story was kind of fun, but the kids couldn't act and many scenes dragged on and on and on...
2 of 13 users found this helpful
3
NecromusJan 3, 2013
I saw this at a friend's house along with the second Harry Potter movie after it was released on video. This movie just bored me to death. I don't see what all the hype is about. Maybe you had to read the book, my friends who have read theI saw this at a friend's house along with the second Harry Potter movie after it was released on video. This movie just bored me to death. I don't see what all the hype is about. Maybe you had to read the book, my friends who have read the book tell me that the book is way better than the movie. Rating it as a bad movie since it was so boring I only remember two parts, the beginning and the end and neither or those were that exciting either. I thought the ending was stupid actually. After seeing the first two movies, I have never bothered seeing any others since I was so bored by the first two.… Expand
1 of 4 users found this helpful13
All this user's reviews
2
FlipjeFeb 9, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Of all the films I have seen, this is the only one I walked out of the theatre on. Mind you, I have tried to be selective of many films and there have been bland ones I sat through, I found this piece of cinema back in 2001 absolutely cringe-worthy. I have not returned to it since but everything about it struck me as over-the-top, child wish fulfilment. J.K. Rowling's book turned to celluloid may have sold millions of tickets yet this is nothing more than a trite rehashing of the numerous collective tropes of the culture industry. Chosen one as orphan. Quirky side-kick. Bold and brash female friend. Obvious nemesis. Chosen one is adept at everything. Yawn after all the checkmarks are checked. This is pure fantasy and evokes nothing mature or three dimensional. Aesthetics of the film are modest while the main actors back then struck me as stilted and clunky in their delivery. The seasoned professionals, some Shakespearean actors stood out as moderately genuine and dedicated to their roles while the child actors motored along with unemotional delivery. But no, their ability to act was not the point. This whole venture was to make the audience not only relate to the character but long to be them. The Harry Potter books were marketed for a younger audience yet really they were blatent cash grabs, feeding on the fantasy of the uneducated. I admire someone like J.K.Rowling for her generosity and work with charity with her earnings yet she is guilty of arresting the development of an entire generation and this film is a contination of that. There is nothing edifying here and when the scene in the film where Ron wants to sacrifice himself for Harry over the perilous game of chess, I had it. "Harry, it's you who has to go on." Barf. Mental food poisoning. This is tripe dressed up. Digest at your own peril.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
Dostoyevsky3Jan 8, 2022
A mixed tone, bloated runtime, uneven plotting, and unbearable expository pacing completely diminish the film's desire to provide a more cheery and empowering story that its following installments fail to achieve. The Sorcerer's Stone'sA mixed tone, bloated runtime, uneven plotting, and unbearable expository pacing completely diminish the film's desire to provide a more cheery and empowering story that its following installments fail to achieve. The Sorcerer's Stone's minuscule intentions are unable to overcome its colossal troubles to adapt the story.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
2
kacperiscool20Aug 14, 2022
This movie is based of the book, but unlike the book, the movie just skips the first part just so it can get to him going into hogwarts and all this wizard magic-ness faster. This movie is instantly forgetable, and I wouldn't recommend it to anyone.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
1
BroyaxApr 15, 2020
Ah le fameux Harry Potter ! j'en avais jamais vu un seul... alors comme ils passaient le tout premier à la télé, je l'ai enregistré. Et j'ai bien fait ! J'ai bien fait parce que sinon j'aurais pas pu accélérer, surtout après le premier tiersAh le fameux Harry Potter ! j'en avais jamais vu un seul... alors comme ils passaient le tout premier à la télé, je l'ai enregistré. Et j'ai bien fait ! J'ai bien fait parce que sinon j'aurais pas pu accélérer, surtout après le premier tiers grosso merdo -à moins que ce ne fût le premier quart seulement...

C'est que le bordel entier fait ses putains de deux plombes et demi, tu le crois ça ?... pas étonnant que primo ça n'avance pas... et que secundo, ça n'avance pas. Et tertio, ça ne raconte rien... ou si peu ? tout ça pour ça ?

Evidemment, je ne critique pas ce côté si enfantin, ominprésent, vu que c'est une mômerie pour les mômes masi tout de même... pourquoi aussi long, aussi lénifiant ? pauvres gamins, ils doivent ronfler au bout de 20 minutes...!

J'ai néanmoins trouvé amusant de comparer les bouilles respectives du petit Daniel et de la petite Emma... avec leurs tronches actuelles ! étonnant de constater que Daniel avait déjà sa trogne mais qu'Emma semble encore un bébé ici ! allez, rien que pour ça, j'accorde un... 1 !… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
1
egoBorderApr 28, 2019
I guess it shouldn't be surprising considering the source material, but this movie is dull to a criminal degree. It's hard to believe they couldn't find better child actors for the lead roles, but come prepared to cringe hard at theI guess it shouldn't be surprising considering the source material, but this movie is dull to a criminal degree. It's hard to believe they couldn't find better child actors for the lead roles, but come prepared to cringe hard at the performances here. I guess Potter fans will accept this since liking the books is like admitting you have no taste… Expand
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
1
HarryPotterSuckNov 27, 2020
Harry Potter sucks..........................................................
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
SamjamJun 20, 2012
Harry Potter the movie was great! Yes the book was better, but isn't that always the way when there is a novel to film adaptation? There was magic, friendships and basically evil magicians going around wanting to win the world and killHarry Potter the movie was great! Yes the book was better, but isn't that always the way when there is a novel to film adaptation? There was magic, friendships and basically evil magicians going around wanting to win the world and kill specific people. Great movie and fun for the kids and a good family viewing movie.… Expand
2 of 15 users found this helpful213
All this user's reviews
0
BeacherwahwahOct 21, 2016
Just watched this and it sucks hard! Horrible CGI effects, horrible acting from the youths (apart from Harry who was okay)....utterly charmless. I did like John Williams score though.
1 of 12 users found this helpful111
All this user's reviews
next
Page:
More From This Movie

65 Critic Reviews

7.8 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 77 Project Hail Mary
2 75 Send Help
3 73 Hoppers
4 72 The Sheep Detectives
5 68 Crime 101
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL