Warner Bros. Pictures | Release Date: June 4, 2004
8.3
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 1105 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
975
Mixed:
88
Negative:
42
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)
8
CCJul 29, 2008
Excellent film.as always the central trio undermine the fantastic story and characters with wooden performances and overall dislikability but theyre poor acting is not enough to overshadow awesome stints from Oldman,Rickman and Thewlis to Excellent film.as always the central trio undermine the fantastic story and characters with wooden performances and overall dislikability but theyre poor acting is not enough to overshadow awesome stints from Oldman,Rickman and Thewlis to name but a few. its hilarious to read the geeky fan-boys reviews stating how poorly the director adapted their beloved rowlings book to film when we all know theyre clearly in the wrong.cuaron did a masterful job with a difficult piece of childrens fiction and should have stayed on to direct the other films rather than allowing rank amateurs to toe the line as rowling had intended all along. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
TomK.Aug 19, 2007
Cuaron did genius work ignoring the previous of Chris Columbus. The third film in series is matching the film in style, it's darker and deeper. The work that Elfonso Cuaron did changed the Harry Potter film forever, for good.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
JonLDec 15, 2007
Too episodic to be great, but visually sumptuous and with an actual director at helm, shows the world with far more creativity and authenticity, rather than a visualization of the novels, which aren't much good in the first place.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
MovieLonely94Jul 5, 2011
Harry Potter learns that someone is after him and that person is known as Sirius Black. As he and his friends start their third year at hogswarts, they encounter new dangers that lie just ahead of them as they try to prove whether Sirius isHarry Potter learns that someone is after him and that person is known as Sirius Black. As he and his friends start their third year at hogswarts, they encounter new dangers that lie just ahead of them as they try to prove whether Sirius is innocent of not killing his parents or not. This was the only Potter movie that I've missed in theaters. That was pretty sad. Now to my opinion. Like the first two movies, there's nothing negative to say about this one. The actors were very entertaining (again) and I can say nothing more about Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, or anyone else. The only actor that I have to say to is Michael Gambon for his wonderful performance as Professor Dumbledore. The CGI was cool (again) and even the action was cool (again). The storytelling was amazing and the storyline was well-paced. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is a magnificent third entry of the Potter franchise with a lot of depth to the third book of the series. 8/10 Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
asylumspadezNov 20, 2011
Probably the best film in the series. You not only see a huge increase in skill for the younger cast but you finally see them put the older cast members to some use. I think the long run time is pushing it a little though. The script doesntProbably the best film in the series. You not only see a huge increase in skill for the younger cast but you finally see them put the older cast members to some use. I think the long run time is pushing it a little though. The script doesnt really do that good of a job transitioning from book to film and it doesnt do a good job of explaining.

Also I think Michael Gambon was a great addition for the re-casting of Albus Dumbledore.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
TheGorillaDec 18, 2011
This installment has some depth, and it's enough mature, unlike the first two childish ones.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
DramaStormFeb 16, 2011
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Hello, everyone! I am DramaStorm. And this is my review for the third Harry Potter Movie: Prisoner of Azkaban. Well, this movie is simply really great. There's no two ways about it. Harry and his friends are trying to solve yet another mystery while trying to keep up with their magical schoolwork. Well, thankfully, they are able to save more than just one innocent life in this film and nobody dies. The best part of this movie: When Harry saves himself from getting destroyed by the Dementors. The worst part of this movie: LOL, probably the mishap at the Dursley's house. But you've got to admit, it was pretty funny. Fin. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
filmtrashreviewJul 6, 2011
So the third film takes a much darker route then the first two. I don't mind the darkness and acclaimed best Potter film but this is the shortest and yet it feels like the longest of the films. This film was dumbed down to Hollywood standardSo the third film takes a much darker route then the first two. I don't mind the darkness and acclaimed best Potter film but this is the shortest and yet it feels like the longest of the films. This film was dumbed down to Hollywood standard and honestly I don't feel that this director saved the series at all. The twists in this film are a lot better then "The Chamber of Secrets" and the new look of Harry Potter is visually stunning but I still feel that the filmmakers thought audience members were stupid. They included a pointless segment of the Willow Tree just to show the changing of season. We dealt without this in the first two films, why do we need it now? The only reason that I can think of is the fact that the art direction was completely lacking in this film. We couldn't tell the changing of seasons without those pointless Willow Tree shots and on top of that every character seems to now be wearing fashionable clothing. When watching the behind-the-scenes of this film I found out that the actors were allowed to choose what they wanted to wear. I feel in doing this, Alfonso and his crew wanted to make a summer blockbuster more then the wanted to make a good fantasy film. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
grandpajoe6191Sep 23, 2011
Finally, a harry potter movie that starts childlike and ends with maturity! Bravo Alfonso Cuaron!
14 of 17 users found this helpful143
All this user's reviews
8
AquophisDec 28, 2011
Not as good as the first two, I'm afraid - I wasn't too fond of the inconsistent art direction. The three leads were inexplicably strutting around Hogwarts in their street clothes rather than their usual school robes. While it lacks much ofNot as good as the first two, I'm afraid - I wasn't too fond of the inconsistent art direction. The three leads were inexplicably strutting around Hogwarts in their street clothes rather than their usual school robes. While it lacks much of the warmth and whimsical enchantment of the first two films, and the transition into "dark and gritty" may come across as abrupt to some, the more subdued mood of the movie fits in well with its events - a murderer IS on the loose, after all. Overall, it's a great movie and a satisfying adaptation, but the other ones are better. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
beingryanjudeAug 25, 2014
With Alfonso Cuaron at the helm, the third installment in the Harry Potter series features a deeper, more spectacular visual than the previous two films. While Richard Harris is surely missed, Gary Oldman's Sirius Black is an outstanding addition.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
watithink123May 4, 2012
Now this was the film that started making the film's get really, really good. This was a bit darker than the other two and maybe a bit scary as well for some people. But a must see from me. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban 8.0/10
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
jfrotylpe532Dec 21, 2012
This is were the Harry Potters get great. Gary Oldman surely impressed me with his amazing performance as Sirius Black not to mention David Thewlis excellant acting as Lupin. Plus instead of continuing the playful happy mood like first onesThis is were the Harry Potters get great. Gary Oldman surely impressed me with his amazing performance as Sirius Black not to mention David Thewlis excellant acting as Lupin. Plus instead of continuing the playful happy mood like first ones it added mind-blowing foreshadowing and visuality that the first could not come close to having. Not mention they finally learned how to make a scary yet awesome creature(The Werewolf). This film is the reason that the Harry Potter trilogy stayed strong. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
DisasterpieceMKJan 13, 2013
The first of the film series that I really enjoyed throughout. It has a more definite British feel and sensibility about it, mixing in all of the wonder and magic that Rowling described in her series. A great blend of light and dark, withThe first of the film series that I really enjoyed throughout. It has a more definite British feel and sensibility about it, mixing in all of the wonder and magic that Rowling described in her series. A great blend of light and dark, with those dreary greys that can really make the magic pop on screen. I am certainly glad that they ended up changing directors - Cuaron did a job better than Colombus. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
worleyjamersJun 8, 2013
I don't think this is my favorite HP film, but it certainly is one of the best. Alfonso Cuaron's direction is what holds The Prisoner of Azkaban together There are many brilliant sequences throughout the film, but there are also some momentsI don't think this is my favorite HP film, but it certainly is one of the best. Alfonso Cuaron's direction is what holds The Prisoner of Azkaban together There are many brilliant sequences throughout the film, but there are also some moments where I felt the jumbled plot could have ruined the film, but Cuaron's vision and direction holds it all together and makes for a wonderful viewing experience. This film lacks some of the magic that the first films had, but the performances, writing, direction, cinematography, and tone are all spot-on. Really liked it! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
TrilobiteGAug 3, 2015
With the addition of Remus lupine and the time turner scenario to shadow mediocre dialogue from the main trio, the third instalment of this franchise is just as good as the second
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
mds03Apr 14, 2013
Not quite as good as the first two but it manages to keep you constantly entertained and constantly amazed the whole ride through. I really do think this one brought a whole new style to the Harry Potter series. It seems that as the HarryNot quite as good as the first two but it manages to keep you constantly entertained and constantly amazed the whole ride through. I really do think this one brought a whole new style to the Harry Potter series. It seems that as the Harry Potter movies keep coming out they keep getting less family friendly and more intense and dark. My only word of advice is that you shouldn't let a child below the age of 10 see it because of the werewolf scenes and the dementor scenes. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
SEROJMar 28, 2013
Very interesting story and great action in this one! It's really great, i never get tired of it.... It is possible for you not to understand this if you're watching it for first time or you haven't seen the previous Harry Potter series. SoVery interesting story and great action in this one! It's really great, i never get tired of it.... It is possible for you not to understand this if you're watching it for first time or you haven't seen the previous Harry Potter series. So remember there's NO simple movie in this saga. My final score for the "the Prisoner of Azkaban" is 8/10! Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
sil3nt_nickMar 24, 2013
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Harry returns to his third year at Hogwarts and is joined by his loyal friends, Ron and Hermione. While attending the school, he learns a man by the name of Sirius Black is out to get him-- and is told that he was the one that turned his parents into Voldemort that led to him becoming an orphan. Later on, Harry learns that Sirius may not be as evil as the media portrays him. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Movie1997Sep 8, 2013
Definitely (at the time) the best of the series. It shows a darker side of the Harry Potter world without losing its kid-friendly stage. This movie really does take you on a journey throughout the whole movie with its amazing cinematography.Definitely (at the time) the best of the series. It shows a darker side of the Harry Potter world without losing its kid-friendly stage. This movie really does take you on a journey throughout the whole movie with its amazing cinematography. Who better to direct this than the guy who made "Children of Men" and is going to make "Gravity" (can't wait for that one). Overall, it's a Harry Potter movie that we should have had from the start. Be sure to check out my YouTube channel "TheMovieManLife" for all things movies. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
cag11Dec 1, 2013
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. It has that darker feeling of Harry Potter, which I do like. In the fourth book, you have the first death of the series, and then one in every book and movie afterwards. In order for that to happen, I feel that they needed to darken the tone from the lighter first two movies. And they did a great job with it. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
joao1198pedroNov 28, 2013
this is absolutely the best film of all harry potter saga,alfonso cuaron os definetely better than chris columbus,it had all the magic plus an incredebly cuaron style.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
nickrovertOct 24, 2013
'Prisoner of Azkaban' is one of the best-directed films of the franchise, however its thin story line makes it generally forgettable compared to the other films in the franchise.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
AaronWasserman2May 4, 2014
Finally the Potter film that kicks of this film adaption the right way. New director Alfonso is superior to Chris Columbus in almost all ways. Taking away the kid like fluff and inserting some darkness. The young stars finally get a chance toFinally the Potter film that kicks of this film adaption the right way. New director Alfonso is superior to Chris Columbus in almost all ways. Taking away the kid like fluff and inserting some darkness. The young stars finally get a chance to shine and own their roles. Harry 3 is good to go. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
kyle20ellisMar 25, 2022
This is certainly darker than the first two instalments, and not as funny. But based upon a truly excellent but complex book, it is a very good film nonetheless. In my reviews on the first two films, I forgot to mention the music by JohnThis is certainly darker than the first two instalments, and not as funny. But based upon a truly excellent but complex book, it is a very good film nonetheless. In my reviews on the first two films, I forgot to mention the music by John Williams. In all three movies, it is very good, but not Williams's best work. His scores to Star Wars, ET and Home Alone are better. The only real quibble i had with the movie was Michael Gambon as Dumbledore. Richard Harris, the first and better Dumbledore, had died, and although Gambon was good, Harris suited the character a lot more in terms of looks and sincerity. The three leads are still likable, and they are given solid support by Maggie Smith, Alan Rickman and Robbie Coltrane. The real treat lies in the newcomers though, namely David Thewlis as Lupin, Emma Thompson as Trelawney and Gary Oldman as Sirius. Timothy Spall I felt was a little odd for Wormtail. The Dementors I felt quite terrifying, a lot more chilling than they were in the book. All in all, very good. 8/10. Bethany Cox Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
gdiego135Dec 4, 2015
Great 3rd installment to an awesome franchise. It starts off really funny, and then get's dark but still very interesting, i used to have this movie on VHS so i would watch it a lot, now im getting it on blu-ray.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
aadityamudharApr 17, 2016
This one transcends fantasy and becomes a magical epic. it has an emotional resonance that the other two somewhat lacked. This time, you can actually relate to the characters and the difficulties they go through. The human side of PotterThis one transcends fantasy and becomes a magical epic. it has an emotional resonance that the other two somewhat lacked. This time, you can actually relate to the characters and the difficulties they go through. The human side of Potter comes clear. None of the Potter movies were bad, but this one takes the cake, and sets a new standard. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
americanbeautyJan 17, 2016
Este é, de longe, o melhor filme de toda a saga Harry Potter. O livro foi muito bem aproveitado - embora tenha sentido falta de algumas cenas como a do Lupin explicando sobre os Marotos na Casa dos Gritos -, possui algumas falhas, claro, masEste é, de longe, o melhor filme de toda a saga Harry Potter. O livro foi muito bem aproveitado - embora tenha sentido falta de algumas cenas como a do Lupin explicando sobre os Marotos na Casa dos Gritos -, possui algumas falhas, claro, mas isso não tira a excelência do filme. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Muskrat147Jul 30, 2016
Arguably the best of the series (next to Deathly Hallows Part 2), Prisoner of Azkaban is a brilliant shift from its lighthearted predecessors, and also improves on the special effects, acting, pacing, and direction.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Aaron_WassermanMay 31, 2016
My favorite Potter film. It is so rewatchable and it never bores me. It is suspenseful and a much darker and mature addition to the Potter franchise than the previous two installments.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
gNov 15, 2016
The cinematography of the film is naturally still compared to Lubeski's camerawork, Cuaron's direction gets better throughout the film from a family-drama to investigation to the battle what Harry is trying to do and what he must do in everyThe cinematography of the film is naturally still compared to Lubeski's camerawork, Cuaron's direction gets better throughout the film from a family-drama to investigation to the battle what Harry is trying to do and what he must do in every episode of the series. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
SonicHD7May 31, 2017
Harry Potter's (Daniel Radcliffe) third year at Hogwarts starts off badly when he learns deranged killer Sirius Black (Gary Oldman) has escaped from Azkaban prison and is bent on murdering the teenage wizard. While Hermione's (Emma Watson)Harry Potter's (Daniel Radcliffe) third year at Hogwarts starts off badly when he learns deranged killer Sirius Black (Gary Oldman) has escaped from Azkaban prison and is bent on murdering the teenage wizard. While Hermione's (Emma Watson) cat torments Ron's (Rupert Grint) sickly rat, causing a rift among the trio, a swarm of nasty Dementors is sent to protect the school from Black. A mysterious new teacher helps Harry learn to defend himself, but what is his secret tie to Sirius Black? Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Jaredc324Jul 18, 2019
Just a spectacular movie. Cuaron puts the edge into Harry Potter and gives it a new breath of style & craft that awakens new boundaries and evolutions to the story and world. As we begin to mature with the characters and the world they're in.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
zNeverSleepingSep 28, 2019
O filme tem uma nova atmosfera - um pouco mais sombria - que advêm com, tanto os novos personagens adentrados na franquia, quanto aos já presentes. Simplesmente espetacular. A trilha sonora é unica, como sempre. O roteiro é bom; corta muitasO filme tem uma nova atmosfera - um pouco mais sombria - que advêm com, tanto os novos personagens adentrados na franquia, quanto aos já presentes. Simplesmente espetacular. A trilha sonora é unica, como sempre. O roteiro é bom; corta muitas coisas do livro, mas tendo em vista que o filme mesmo assim já é longo, não sei se eles puderam fazer muita coisa. Aconselho muito que leiam o livro, caso contrario, talvez fiquem um pouco perdidos - o que definitivamente não é um mérito do próprio roteiro. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
ThejodjeremieNov 5, 2020
This film is my favorite so far in the franchise. The special effects look great and the tone of the film feels more serious. The story is great and not too complicated.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
MrPajamasSep 8, 2020
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is a little different from previous works. The characters grew up for us and the story is a little more serious. The plot is also different and again very successful, of course, with an excellentHarry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is a little different from previous works. The characters grew up for us and the story is a little more serious. The plot is also different and again very successful, of course, with an excellent soundtrack. Overall, the story leaves the previous episodes far behind and focuses mainly on Harry's relationship with Black, and it works. Another excellent sequel. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
geewahApr 21, 2021
Close to if not the best of the series.
A new director brought a much needed change in direction for the franchise that put it on a path to coming close to reaching it's potential.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
adzcantillasNov 24, 2021
Sirius ending up down Azkaban even if he didn't do Wrong is a Symbol of Injustice which is Nothing New. I'm like a Law somehow existing within Society going out Money ending up jailing Innocent Ones while Criminals are getting away with it isSirius ending up down Azkaban even if he didn't do Wrong is a Symbol of Injustice which is Nothing New. I'm like a Law somehow existing within Society going out Money ending up jailing Innocent Ones while Criminals are getting away with it is Nothing but Trash. You know what? I'm thinking it's not what we do 'coz what weighs a Great Degree is Why We Do Everything We Do. If y'all ask me I just wanna grabbing shots ending up Happy without doing Wrong but I'm not a Saint so if Who-Such-Is did something destroying Who I Am myself is just chillin' out waiting when Heavens will throwing out a Hell such Evil Folks should ending up with. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
gm101Jan 20, 2011
A decent adaptation, but felt there were kinda too many changes from the book. This used to be my least favorite Harry Potter movie, until the Half-Blood Prince movie came out and took that honor.
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
7
TokyochuchuNov 10, 2014
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is, in my opinion, one of the weakest Harry Potter movies. I can't really place my finger on exactly why but the film seems to drag somewhat. Although it's shorter than part 2, it actually feels a lotHarry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is, in my opinion, one of the weakest Harry Potter movies. I can't really place my finger on exactly why but the film seems to drag somewhat. Although it's shorter than part 2, it actually feels a lot longer. That said, Prisoner of Azkaban is still excellent entertainment (as are all of the Potter movies). Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
jimmytancrediMay 29, 2011
This and the Goblet of Fire are unique in the saga. Both were directed by directors who didn't make any other drive then. What made them both very different from the others, that here was a great result! The most bucolic of the saga, the bestThis and the Goblet of Fire are unique in the saga. Both were directed by directors who didn't make any other drive then. What made them both very different from the others, that here was a great result! The most bucolic of the saga, the best performance of John Williams soundtrack (especially the beautiful Buckbeak's Flight) and the cast far more grown up. A little heavy, this film begins the process of maturation of both the characters and the fans, which may even scare some parents off guard, but the unique beauty of this unique film saga makes it worth taking a chance on him. Cuaron's direction has improved a lot and the course of the series. The director has several moments of great creativity throughout the film. Most infidelity script from the book than the first two films also helped a lot to the improvement of the series, since this was much less tiring than its predecessors. The junior improved performances (Rupert Grint decreases in the faces), but Radcliffe, disappointing especially in the scene where he discovers a secret about Sirius Black and starts crying (pathetic performance in this scene). Technically also represented a major advance. This movie has the best visual effects for the whole saga. The Buckbeak, the Dementors, the Animagi and werewolf are just fantastic. In addition, the trail of John Williams is the better of him in the series (Buckbeak's Flight is wonderful). There is also a beautiful photograph. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Bruce722Dec 31, 2012
This was just as good as the first two movies, probably even better if I were to ignore the book. The problem is, the book was outstanding and this movie had more variation than either of the first two adaptations. And as I have said numerousThis was just as good as the first two movies, probably even better if I were to ignore the book. The problem is, the book was outstanding and this movie had more variation than either of the first two adaptations. And as I have said numerous times before, I understand that certain things must be changed or cut out entirely for time purposes but in this movie there were plenty of things they needlessly added and many other things they changed that had no reason to be changed whatsoever. Change for changes sake is rarely good. Still, it was a good movie but I'm interested to see how they adapt the much larger books that follow this one. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
potatoes351Aug 14, 2012
After a little break the Harry Potter franchise is back on track. After the poor show that was Chamber of Secrets, Prisoner of Azkaban puts all right that was once wrong. Once again sticking true to the books and only using SFX where needed,After a little break the Harry Potter franchise is back on track. After the poor show that was Chamber of Secrets, Prisoner of Azkaban puts all right that was once wrong. Once again sticking true to the books and only using SFX where needed, not all the time. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
OfficialNov 1, 2013
"Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban" is the third movie in the series. Does it top the previous two though? Not exactly. The movie has a slightly disjointed feel and lacked the beauty and the craft, which made the first too brilliant."Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban" is the third movie in the series. Does it top the previous two though? Not exactly. The movie has a slightly disjointed feel and lacked the beauty and the craft, which made the first too brilliant. That being said, the world of Harry Potter is still quite delightful and sophisticated. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
SpangleJul 13, 2017
Heralded as the best entry in the Harry Potter film franchise, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is certainly the best film thus far, though I do hope it is not the best film overall. Perhaps, in writing this review, it is a good timeHeralded as the best entry in the Harry Potter film franchise, Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is certainly the best film thus far, though I do hope it is not the best film overall. Perhaps, in writing this review, it is a good time to admit one of my greatest cinematic sins: I really do not see the hype with Alfonso Cuaron. In fact, I really do not like his work all that much. Having seen all but two of his films, it is becoming increasingly clear that there is something in his films that really turns me off. They look, feel, and sound like cinematic classics, but lack that crucial element to make them truly soar above the competition, when they are good as is the case with Prisoner of Azkaban and Gravity. While A Little Princess left me feeling a little indifferent, I found Children of Men to be impeccably underwhelming and I really had to gut it through Y Tu Mama Tambien, which was one of the worst films I have ever seen due to how juvenile, crude, and vulgar of a film it turned out to be. Yet, in saying all of this, I let myself get overhyped for Prisoner of Azkaban due to word of mouth and the presence of Cuaron. Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me five times, definitely shame on me at this point.

What really holds the film back is how rushed everything feels. While the film's plotting is surprisingly tight and lacking in exposition and diversions into various wacky elements of the wizarding world, the film is a weird position. It is still a long film (though shorter than its predecessors), but feels far more rushed than either of them. It would have been better served being as long as the other films, even though those films were hurt by their length. By further developing scenes, characters, and dialogue, the film would feel more adequately paced instead of being a speeding bullet to the finish line. The film's climax and falling action are particularly susceptible to this with the film ditching its slow build-up to revealing Sirius Black (Gary Oldman), exploring the dementors, and building fantastic atmospheric tension. With the film introducing time travel during the climax, quickening the pace is perhaps a technique used by Cuaron to make the film less repetitive. However, the quickened pace really undermines the most important of the film: Harry meeting his godfather Sirius and learning the truth behind his parent's death. Instead of letting the emotional weight of this reveal take hold, the film rushes through and then half-heartedly tries to go back to these moments with characters explaining exactly how they felt, such as when Harry explains the secrets behind the encounter by the lake to Hermione. It is admittedly a series aimed at children, yet like its predecessors, it feels the need to explain details that are either inconsequential or obvious to the children in the audience. As a result of this, the film never really convinces anybody regarding Sirius' turn around from lead villain to kind godfather. Harry seems all too willing to believe anything about this man who he was told was loyal to Voldemort. It makes no sense, even if the film does it best to try and go back to convince you it made sense. It is touching, sure, but Cuaron never really made the moment feel earned or realistic. Thus, the film feels rather lacking in heart and soul. It has spirit for sure, but feels far too pedestrian and safe to really knock it out of the park, which is a real Cuaron trademark.

That said, Cuaron really does add some terrific touches in bringing the novel to life. Taking the Spielbergian child-like wonder of Chris Columbus' first two films and blending it with a much darker world, the first hour of the Prisoner of Azkaban is a master class in atmospheric tension. Starting off with the ominous train ride in which the dementors are introduced and the groundwork for Sirius Black's shocking escape from Azkaban prison is laid out, the film becomes both a treat for the eyes via good special effects and a thrilling experience. With the slow reveal of the dementors via the freezing of the bus and their terrifying encounter with Harry on the train, Cuaron sets the scene perfectly for just how terrifying these figures will become in the film, often far exceeding Sirius' menacing exterior in the beginning. It is honestly this tremendous build-up for Sirius with such an ominous feeling in the air whenever he is mentioned that the film's ending feels so unconvincing. Fortunately, that build-up is so good, it is hard to deny that the film is a truly haunting and mesmerizing experience for much of its runtime.

Cuaron also smartly takes advantage of the design of Hogwarts to add to the ominous nature of the film. With the pictures watching the kids' every move, the film begins to feel very much like a gothic horror at times with how much the building factors into the fright factor. With an intricate design as always, the long looming features of the school are an ominous sight on their own.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
dante_finnDec 22, 2012
A wondourus spellbinder with laughs and shivers
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
RayzorMooseNov 12, 2013
Harry Potter imprisons its audience with entertainment.
Harry Potter rolls out its third film in the series with a repetitive but very in-depth theme. The Prisoner of Azkaban unlocks new visions into the characters mysterious pasts, and
Harry Potter imprisons its audience with entertainment.
Harry Potter rolls out its third film in the series with a repetitive but very in-depth theme. The Prisoner of Azkaban unlocks new visions into the characters mysterious pasts, and finds the same magic it had in the first two with a continuously darker storyline.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
MovieManiac83Apr 23, 2015
It's interesting to note that, of the three Harry Potter novels thus far filmed, the longest on the written page has turned into the shortest on screen. This is a good thing, because it means that the filmmakers are becoming less literal andIt's interesting to note that, of the three Harry Potter novels thus far filmed, the longest on the written page has turned into the shortest on screen. This is a good thing, because it means that the filmmakers are becoming less literal and more cinematic in their adaptations. A flaw of the first two movies, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone and Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets, is that they tried to cram every nuance into the screenplay - an act that had a negative impact upon the films' pacing. For Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, script-writer Steve Kloves has pared J.K. Rowling's story to its essence, resulting in a more streamlined motion picture.

Although Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban stands well enough on its own, it has a "middle chapter" feeling. In other words, there's no real beginning or ending. Little is resolved and the film's climax is low-key. The villain of the first two chapters and the overall series, the dreaded Voldemort, is absent. His apparent replacement is Sirius Black (Gary Oldman), although appearances can be deceiving. All of this doesn't make The Prisoner of Azkaban inferior to its predecessors. The appeal is much the same, but the "feel" is a little different. The tone is darker and more claustrophobic. I attribute this to the change in directors. Chris Columbus, who helmed the first two movies, has stepped into the producer's chair, leaving the primary behind-the-camera duties to Alfonso Cuarón (who establishes this closer in nature to A Little Princess than Y Tu Mama Tambien).

There's no question that Cuarón has put his stamp on this movie. The return of so many familiar characters will keep viewers comfortable, but the stylistic changes make it seem as if this Harry Potter adventure is taking place in a different universe. The most obvious change is to Hogwarts. Although outwardly the same, the school is photographed and presented in a manner that makes it more ominous and less friendly than in the previous two installments. Wardrobe is another seemingly minor yet significant alteration. Harry, Ron, and Hermione have abandoned the school uniforms that were their standard garb in The Sorcerer's Stone and The Chamber of Secrets. Instead, they dress in "normal" clothing: sweatshirts, jeans, sneakers, etc. This has the effect of making Hogwarts feel more alien than before.

Moments of character development are widely spaced. (That has a lot to do with the deeper cuts made to the source material.) Still, we learn a few things about Harry's background. The Malfoy/Potter feud enters another chapter. And we see the beginnings of a tentative affection between Ron and Hermione. (The two of them exchange glances and hold hands. There's little question where Rowling is going with this relationship, especially considering the predictability of romance in fantasy stories.)

The recent bankability of fantasy has resulted in a large number of copycat possibilities entering the production pipeline. With both The Lord of the Rings and the Harry Potter movies proving to be solid box-office performers, there's little question that the genre is here to stay. Although Tolkien's story is done, J.K. Rowling's has at least four more installments to go (the final two of which haven't even been published). If the filmmakers continue to keep the quality level high, there will be plenty of pleasurable hours ahead. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban proves that a new director with a different perspective can freshen a series that could otherwise resort to stale repetition.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
PanchogulDec 4, 2018
Tristemente debo decir que esta es la entrega que menos me gusta de la franquicia a nivel pelicula/libro, pero refiriendome unicamente a la pelicula es excelente a nivel cinematografico, pues es obvio ya que Alfonso Cuarón es un verdadero genio.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
FuturedirectorApr 14, 2017
A satisfying mix of muddled stunts with an overrated dark storytelling and a notably talented cast with a surprisingly smart direction. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban opens another chapter to its every-time-better saga on a betterA satisfying mix of muddled stunts with an overrated dark storytelling and a notably talented cast with a surprisingly smart direction. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban opens another chapter to its every-time-better saga on a better successful way. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
razMNApr 10, 2022
It's like the best Harry Potter movie: fun, the characters are well developed, the visuals are ok and it doesn't involve Lord Voldemort as much, yet it's underwhelming, it has a lot of useless scenes and throws around a lot of lore piecesIt's like the best Harry Potter movie: fun, the characters are well developed, the visuals are ok and it doesn't involve Lord Voldemort as much, yet it's underwhelming, it has a lot of useless scenes and throws around a lot of lore pieces without exactly explaining why, and the final act of the movie is super rushed. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
CoreGamer1408Apr 14, 2022
Just seemed a filler movie(book) for the next movie(book). The dementors are genuinely creepy things though. Pretty interesting until the weak ending.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
cameronhalmansJan 9, 2019
The best in the franchise so far, directed by a genius in Alfonso Cauron, but still holds on to the same old predicatabilites. The direction is right with this one however. It’s dark and gritty, as a film like this should be.

65/100
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Mikibruno02Nov 8, 2020
I loved this book ... I liked this movie, that's right, I didn't love it. Starting from the fact that directing did not drive me crazy, even "too much adolescence" made me sick. New entries in the cast and interpretations always up toI loved this book ... I liked this movie, that's right, I didn't love it. Starting from the fact that directing did not drive me crazy, even "too much adolescence" made me sick. New entries in the cast and interpretations always up to expectations, if not further. I find it too emotionless and aloof, even John Williams took a step back while doing a good job. It's not a bad movie, but I don't think it's great either: 7. Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
glommanFeb 28, 2022
A good but very dense and isolated movie in the Harry Potter universe. As usual the series doesn't really know what to do with the plethora of characters, stories, and places the books portray, leaving you after more than 2 hours like you'veA good but very dense and isolated movie in the Harry Potter universe. As usual the series doesn't really know what to do with the plethora of characters, stories, and places the books portray, leaving you after more than 2 hours like you've just watched nothing of particularity. Still an entertaining and very dark and "adult" movie for Harry Potter standards Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
pur__0_0__May 12, 2021
After watching The Chamber of Secrets I was a bit skeptical to continue watching the franchise. That was what I had in mind when I began watching this - Will it also show filthy, cringy characters? Is there going to be terrible CGI withAfter watching The Chamber of Secrets I was a bit skeptical to continue watching the franchise. That was what I had in mind when I began watching this - Will it also show filthy, cringy characters? Is there going to be terrible CGI with literally no beautiful locations? Are there going to be tons of disgusting scenes? Turns out this movie is better in terms of all those things. And definitely worth a watch if you haven't done it already (I know you muts have, I am the only 90's-born stooge who still hasn't watched this series).

The story this time takes a much dark, complicated turn. In the beginning of the movie itself Harry kills his aunt, or so it seems since it has been left ambiguously. He doesn't even hesitate from using his magical powers to scare his family anymore, although it is never explained how his uncle knows that he's not allowed to use his powers. This time, just like every other time he is to escape from home and go to Hogwarts station. But this time he does it in a bus being driven by a ghost. I like how every time Harry has to escape from home it always happens in a funny and wholesome manner. Those are the scenes that I could watch forever without getting tired.

As the series is progressing, Harry Potter is having a higher budget, which is clearly visible by the fact that now it is following the "show, don't tell" principle of storytelling way more often. And that's why the story is using a lot less runtime giving exposition or conversations but rather on actually doing things. I learnt this the hard way. I was doing my project on my computer while watching the movie on the phone, and I missed a lot of scenes and had to rewind to see them again. This is a habit that I had developed from the last two movies of the franchise. And I'm really happy to see that supposedly the Potterheads must have really enjoyed seeing it in the theatres or wherever they saw it. They wouldn't have wasted any time on the talkikng scenes like sci-fi movies normally do.

However, I am more used to having Harry Potter having a simple story, just like the movies of that time like Narnia and Lord of the Rings. I was doing a project while watching the movie on my phone, so I stopped seeing the movie for like, 5 minutes and by then everything had changed. I never understood when Harry and Hermione went to the past and what exactly were they trying to change. I also didn't know who that guy was who sat on the flying creature and flew away. Also what finally happened of the Dementor, I completely missed out on that part.

There is something about the Harry Potter movies that stops me from wanting to watch them, and I have no idea why. I also get this feeling with Stuart Little and Narnia. So I can't say for a guarantee that I will rewatch it to watch the scenes that I skipped. Although this movie is a major improvement over Chamber of Secrets, it doesn't match the standard that Sorcerer's Stone has set. I have heard enough about Harry Potter and how much it means to everyone, but personally for me it's not a franchsie I could possibly bond with for some reason. I hope I change my mind soon after future movies.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Cementer200Sep 27, 2020
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is a good movie. it's good to see the harry potter book series turn into a movie series.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
omnifaceMar 8, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. a semi magical movie for a good time

pros
magic
good ending
good people good knowledge cons
poor start
the prisoner scene slightly redeeming graphics
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
MuhamedHJan 3, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. everything take 10/10 except the story. I don’t like the idea and I’m don’t like loop idea and I don't know who is the villain for this I’m give the story 7/10 Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
TyranianApr 9, 2019
Potter 3 is another solid entry with good effects and slightly fewer plot holes.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Rox22Apr 26, 2015
One thing I don't get about this movie is all the overwhelming praise it gets. In my opinion this one of my least favorite of the Harry Potter movies.

Granted the effects are top notch, as usual, acting is mostly OK but perhaps a bit over
One thing I don't get about this movie is all the overwhelming praise it gets. In my opinion this one of my least favorite of the Harry Potter movies.

Granted the effects are top notch, as usual, acting is mostly OK but perhaps a bit over the top at times. The plot, while interesting, feels rushed and the movie on th e whole feels like th e cliff notes to a much bigger story (one could argue that all the movies are like this, but this one just feels like it more.)

The darker atmosphere, while done well, really is brought on too quickly when compared to the lighter hearted predecessors. It felt too much like the new director was trying too hard to give it a look and feel of his own.

Overall:
HPatPoA is good movie, it just feels like it is missing something that left me thinking "Is that it?"
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
6
SrPepeJan 3, 2018
La verdad que a mi gusto es la peor de las 8 pero eso no la hace mala ...
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
jalalA.KJul 27, 2010
BRILLIANT!
0 of 3 users found this helpful
5
AndreaDec 15, 2005
I just finished watching the first 3 Harry Potter films on DVD, in preparation for seeing the fourth film in the theatres tomorrow. Watching the films in this way really emphaszies how different the third film is from its predecessors. If I I just finished watching the first 3 Harry Potter films on DVD, in preparation for seeing the fourth film in the theatres tomorrow. Watching the films in this way really emphaszies how different the third film is from its predecessors. If I had not seen the first two films I would probabyl have rated this film a bit higher, but what bothered me was that this director chose to change both the scenery and Hogwarth's structure/routines. I liked that the first two films played up Hogwarth's similarities to traditional English boarding schools, and I was especialyl disappointed to see that this new director chose to "modernize" so many things (including the street clothing the characters wear for much of this film). Most significant is the castign change for the role of Professor Dumbledore. Another reviewere noted here that Dumbledore is the centre of the novels, and it's important to really feel that he's trustworthy as a leader. The late Richard Harris was wonderful; the new actor plays Dumbledore as a bit of a joke, and this bothered me. Dumbledore is portrayed in this film as a doddering old man, which is absolutely contrary to the books themselves and to the prior 2 films. All in all, this film will probably be most appreciated by people who haven't read the books or seen either of the previous films. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
5
GoldenEye16Aug 21, 2010
Definitely not as good as the first to. I feel like it lacked the craft, beauty, and authenticity of the first two films and was really immature, especially at the end. I don't understand how you can end a movie, especially Harry PotterDefinitely not as good as the first to. I feel like it lacked the craft, beauty, and authenticity of the first two films and was really immature, especially at the end. I don't understand how you can end a movie, especially Harry Potter with that last scene/image. It really felt cheesy when it should be majestic and beautiful. It wasn't bad but really I didn't like it as much. Expand
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
5
GavGav96Aug 15, 2010
High on special effects and much more spooky, funny and mature than the two previous films, but the direction seems to be a lot more lazy than the other films. This has resulted in my least favourite in the whole series (this far)
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
Film_Fanatic_15Nov 22, 2010
The third time around didn't charm me as well as the first two movies in the franchise. They changed the director, which had a big effect on the overall tone of the movie. It was dark and unrelenting to watch. The only thing that appealed toThe third time around didn't charm me as well as the first two movies in the franchise. They changed the director, which had a big effect on the overall tone of the movie. It was dark and unrelenting to watch. The only thing that appealed to me was how it ended and the magical scenery around Hogwarts. The rest, I could forget about it. There never was a bright moment in the movie, and the only thing Harry has to hold onto is his two friends, Hermoine and Ron. Harry has enemies, he has friends. He still hasn't fully understood that he will in the end have an epic battle with Voldemort because he has an ultimate desire too. Lord Voldemort is very powerful, but his lurking presence around the halls of Hogwarts doesn't frighten him as much as it used to. The director gives us an uncomfortable viewing experience that I wan't happy with and wish this doesn't happen again in the next film. Expand
2 of 9 users found this helpful27
All this user's reviews
5
spadenxDec 2, 2011
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Overall it was another basic HP film that doesnt really do much for the series. While it does start to make use of the older cast members, The acting from the young cast members is probably some of the worst in the series (A lot of over acting from them).

Also the film is rather corny through out and it doesnt even come close to the emotional feel that the book had.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
csw12Mar 25, 2012
Harry Potter has suffered it's first little hiccup. I didn't really enjoy the new kind of filmmaking. The story suffers from a disjointed feel which i believe which not play well with people who have read the book, like me.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
FilipeNetoFeb 12, 2018
Interesting but not surprising.

This film is the adaptation of the third book in the Harry Potter's saga written by J.K. Rowling, and is the first in the franchise that isn't directed by Chris Columbus, who makes way for Alfonso Cuarón. The
Interesting but not surprising.

This film is the adaptation of the third book in the Harry Potter's saga written by J.K. Rowling, and is the first in the franchise that isn't directed by Chris Columbus, who makes way for Alfonso Cuarón. The cast, however, remains the same, which allows to this film doesn't seems a totally different thing from the first two, although there are changes in the way the story is told and seen. One of the most obvious changes is the gradual abandonment of the use of black school robes, almost ubiquitous in the first two movies. For some fans, its a transition to another stage of the film franchise. Also notable is the arrival of Michael Gambon to the role of Albus Dumbledore, left vacant by the death of Richard Harris. Although loyalty and attachment to the original book and it's details is a feature that will come to gradually disappearing, this movie still follows closely the history of the book. For all these reasons, this movie entertains, delights but haven't nothing surprising.
Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
KarlK.Sep 5, 2006
It's not as magical as the first two films. The sounds were also very poor, it doesn't seem to compliment the mood of the scenes. The only thing I liked about the movie was the environments were more detailed. Over-all, it was a It's not as magical as the first two films. The sounds were also very poor, it doesn't seem to compliment the mood of the scenes. The only thing I liked about the movie was the environments were more detailed. Over-all, it was a bit disappointing. Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
4
sebastianaliJun 3, 2022
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. To be honest, this movie is terrible, much worse than the previous two. I have practically the same criticism with this movie as with Harry Potter 2, so just check out that review, i wouldnt repeat myself. And the time traveling aspect is so underdeveloped...
There are some moments in the movie where it shines though, like the visuals, all of the conversations with Harry and Remus Lupinand and Hagrid still manages to being the "comfort" point when the series needs it. Unfortunately the generic villian, the underdeveloped story and all of the forced situations kills this one. This movie shouldnt be three hours long.
Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
AustinM.Jan 8, 2009
This one just doesn't give me that feeling the first two gave me and it lacks the action of the 4th and 5th films. By far the worst so far.
3 of 23 users found this helpful
2
MiguelT.Jul 16, 2009
By far the worst Harry Potter movie. The adaptation is horrible, and the story-telling is lousy. The director gives a lot of time to stupid details [the bus, the spider-book, the boggart class...] instead of telling important passages in the By far the worst Harry Potter movie. The adaptation is horrible, and the story-telling is lousy. The director gives a lot of time to stupid details [the bus, the spider-book, the boggart class...] instead of telling important passages in the story. And, the worst of all: the ending. The ending SUCKS. Looks like they ran out of money. Fortunately this was the only movie directed by Cuaron. Expand
0 of 4 users found this helpful
0
RitaS.Sep 22, 2007
Seriously, it needs to be redone. Professional reviewers, most of whom have no idea what the book is about, give it a good review because of what? The special effects? The "dark"ness? Did they read the book? Did the !@^%$#!&! director even Seriously, it needs to be redone. Professional reviewers, most of whom have no idea what the book is about, give it a good review because of what? The special effects? The "dark"ness? Did they read the book? Did the !@^%$#!&! director even read the book!?!?! Or did someone just give him a 2 minute summary of it and he made the movie out of what he could remember from it? How did JKR agree to this? Did she even? I can only imagine her feelings of horror as she watched her book getting murdered. It seems these questions will go unanswered. Feels like scenes were mixed up and a lot of stuff has been horribly changed and a lot has been left out. Good thing the director didn't stick around for the fourth part. Good riddance. Expand
0 of 5 users found this helpful