Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban
Warner Bros. Pictures | Release Date: June 4, 2004
8.3
USER SCORE
Universal acclaim based on 1105 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
975
Mixed:
88
Negative:
42
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
9
Annoymous1Jul 10, 2013
Just like Deathly Hallows, this movie is an attention grabbing masterpiece of the dark arts. And if thats not enough, Peter Pettigrew acted like he had rabies, hilarious indeed!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
AReviewsJun 24, 2013
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is impressive and glorious, with new ideas and funny moments, I loved it, the best one...YET, the visuals are outstanding as usual but the story gets more interesting and scary!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
BrunoADJun 14, 2013
In my opinion HP3 is the second best of franquia.Motivos:

We have a new director, new Hogwarts and a climate more positive sombrio.Esse is the HP3 had a new director a director with a different vision, a director who made ​​a radicalIn my opinion HP3 is the second best of franquia.Motivos:

We have a new director, new Hogwarts and a climate more positive sombrio.Esse is the HP3 had a new director a director with a different vision, a director who made ​​a radical change to the franchise that worked.
And this time Kloves motrou not need a movie 160 minutes to show that is true to the book. We have a movie 140 minutes incredibly magical, intelligent, great and amazing. Wonderful art direction, with effect otimos and with a handkerchief young woman who is very amadureçenco.

Not to talk about the negatives because it has.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
worleyjamersJun 8, 2013
I don't think this is my favorite HP film, but it certainly is one of the best. Alfonso Cuaron's direction is what holds The Prisoner of Azkaban together There are many brilliant sequences throughout the film, but there are also some momentsI don't think this is my favorite HP film, but it certainly is one of the best. Alfonso Cuaron's direction is what holds The Prisoner of Azkaban together There are many brilliant sequences throughout the film, but there are also some moments where I felt the jumbled plot could have ruined the film, but Cuaron's vision and direction holds it all together and makes for a wonderful viewing experience. This film lacks some of the magic that the first films had, but the performances, writing, direction, cinematography, and tone are all spot-on. Really liked it!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Tss5078May 11, 2013
In year three, our cast of unique and magical characthers have to deal with a new threat, an escaped prisoner, from Azkaban Prison, who seems to want to kill Harry Potter. Azkaban was a return to the magical formula that made Harry PotterIn year three, our cast of unique and magical characthers have to deal with a new threat, an escaped prisoner, from Azkaban Prison, who seems to want to kill Harry Potter. Azkaban was a return to the magical formula that made Harry Potter legendary. The story here is suburb and unlike the Chamber of Secrets, it isn't dummied down or rushed for us. New elements are introduced such as the secret map and time travel, but perhaps most important of all we finally see Harry demonstrate some of this incredible power that has led to his fame at Hogwarts. The story was terrific, the action was great, the performances were off the chart, and the childish stuff was kept to a minimum, but was Azkaban perfect? Many critics will tell you that this is the best of the Potter films and it was terrific, but personally I was hoping to see more of the world outside of Hogwarts. I was looking forward to possibly seeing the inside of Azkaban prison and some of the people who are locked up there. While I appreciate the different views and new filming location, it was still centered at Hogwarts. Not a bad thing, but personally I'd have liked to have seen something else. Aside from that, new Director, Alfonso Cuaron, does use parts of the story that were excluded in the previous films, he also does give us a new location, and view of things. Overall, Cuaron really does do a tremendous job, making this film geared more toward young adults than children. Azkaban is much closer to being what J.K. Rowling intended than the Chamber of Secrets was. I absolutely loved this film, there are just some parts of this film that are truly amazing. If you're picky like I am, and are only going to give Harry Potter one shot, then I suggest the film you watch is The Prisoner of Azkaban.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
9
HaithamBayazeedMay 10, 2013
My favorite of the series, amazing and darker than the rest with more mysteries to figure out and I think it deserves a hard PG! More for families and teens
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
mds03Apr 14, 2013
Not quite as good as the first two but it manages to keep you constantly entertained and constantly amazed the whole ride through. I really do think this one brought a whole new style to the Harry Potter series. It seems that as the HarryNot quite as good as the first two but it manages to keep you constantly entertained and constantly amazed the whole ride through. I really do think this one brought a whole new style to the Harry Potter series. It seems that as the Harry Potter movies keep coming out they keep getting less family friendly and more intense and dark. My only word of advice is that you shouldn't let a child below the age of 10 see it because of the werewolf scenes and the dementor scenes.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
SEROJMar 28, 2013
Very interesting story and great action in this one! It's really great, i never get tired of it.... It is possible for you not to understand this if you're watching it for first time or you haven't seen the previous Harry Potter series. SoVery interesting story and great action in this one! It's really great, i never get tired of it.... It is possible for you not to understand this if you're watching it for first time or you haven't seen the previous Harry Potter series. So remember there's NO simple movie in this saga. My final score for the "the Prisoner of Azkaban" is 8/10!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
sil3nt_nickMar 24, 2013
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Harry returns to his third year at Hogwarts and is joined by his loyal friends, Ron and Hermione. While attending the school, he learns a man by the name of Sirius Black is out to get him-- and is told that he was the one that turned his parents into Voldemort that led to him becoming an orphan. Later on, Harry learns that Sirius may not be as evil as the media portrays him.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
DisasterpieceMKJan 13, 2013
The first of the film series that I really enjoyed throughout. It has a more definite British feel and sensibility about it, mixing in all of the wonder and magic that Rowling described in her series. A great blend of light and dark, withThe first of the film series that I really enjoyed throughout. It has a more definite British feel and sensibility about it, mixing in all of the wonder and magic that Rowling described in her series. A great blend of light and dark, with those dreary greys that can really make the magic pop on screen. I am certainly glad that they ended up changing directors - Cuaron did a job better than Colombus.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Bruce722Dec 31, 2012
This was just as good as the first two movies, probably even better if I were to ignore the book. The problem is, the book was outstanding and this movie had more variation than either of the first two adaptations. And as I have said numerousThis was just as good as the first two movies, probably even better if I were to ignore the book. The problem is, the book was outstanding and this movie had more variation than either of the first two adaptations. And as I have said numerous times before, I understand that certain things must be changed or cut out entirely for time purposes but in this movie there were plenty of things they needlessly added and many other things they changed that had no reason to be changed whatsoever. Change for changes sake is rarely good. Still, it was a good movie but I'm interested to see how they adapt the much larger books that follow this one.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
dante_finnDec 22, 2012
A wondourus spellbinder with laughs and shivers
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
jfrotylpe532Dec 21, 2012
This is were the Harry Potters get great. Gary Oldman surely impressed me with his amazing performance as Sirius Black not to mention David Thewlis excellant acting as Lupin. Plus instead of continuing the playful happy mood like first onesThis is were the Harry Potters get great. Gary Oldman surely impressed me with his amazing performance as Sirius Black not to mention David Thewlis excellant acting as Lupin. Plus instead of continuing the playful happy mood like first ones it added mind-blowing foreshadowing and visuality that the first could not come close to having. Not mention they finally learned how to make a scary yet awesome creature(The Werewolf). This film is the reason that the Harry Potter trilogy stayed strong.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
FilmEqualsJoyNov 10, 2012
The best Potter film out of all 8 movies. Incredible! This is when the series starts to get dark and exciting. Werwolves, dementors, and many more interesting elements make this film unforgettable. The cast shows their acting abilities.The best Potter film out of all 8 movies. Incredible! This is when the series starts to get dark and exciting. Werwolves, dementors, and many more interesting elements make this film unforgettable. The cast shows their acting abilities. Radcliffe, Watson, and Grint are the perfect team. Gary Oldman (Sirius Black) is my favorite part of this film. This is all I could ask for in a Potter film.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
cameronmorewoodNov 8, 2012
This is a new, equally entrancing look at the world of Harry Potter, a darker, haunting film that sticks with you.
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
7
potatoes351Aug 14, 2012
After a little break the Harry Potter franchise is back on track. After the poor show that was Chamber of Secrets, Prisoner of Azkaban puts all right that was once wrong. Once again sticking true to the books and only using SFX where needed,After a little break the Harry Potter franchise is back on track. After the poor show that was Chamber of Secrets, Prisoner of Azkaban puts all right that was once wrong. Once again sticking true to the books and only using SFX where needed, not all the time.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
MonsieurEamesJul 12, 2012
One of my favorite films ever. Alfonso Cuaron takes the series in a whole different direction, and it is for the better. The first two films were great, but it was time to take on a more adult approach, and that's exactly what they did. CastOne of my favorite films ever. Alfonso Cuaron takes the series in a whole different direction, and it is for the better. The first two films were great, but it was time to take on a more adult approach, and that's exactly what they did. Cast continues to charm as well as brilliant sets and effects.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
ZilcellMay 25, 2012
Its one of the best in the series because of great organization of the story.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
8
watithink123May 4, 2012
Now this was the film that started making the film's get really, really good. This was a bit darker than the other two and maybe a bit scary as well for some people. But a must see from me. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban 8.0/10
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
MegWhiteleyMar 28, 2012
Other interesting movie, and the second better of Potter (the first is Deathly Hallows Part 2), is amazing, incredible interesting, emotive, I love this film of Harry Potter.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
csw12Mar 25, 2012
Harry Potter has suffered it's first little hiccup. I didn't really enjoy the new kind of filmmaking. The story suffers from a disjointed feel which i believe which not play well with people who have read the book, like me.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
9
ryflemanJan 24, 2012
One of the great things about this film is the fact that it you are able to follow it without ever reading or watching any of the previous installments. A basic understanding of 'They're wizards, the main characters parents got murdered byOne of the great things about this film is the fact that it you are able to follow it without ever reading or watching any of the previous installments. A basic understanding of 'They're wizards, the main characters parents got murdered by some bloke named Voldemort, and the 3 main characters are BFFs' is all you need to understand this.

Of course this isn't the only shining part of the movie. The characters are starting to mature, making it easier to relate to the characters and make them overall even more likable. The new characters are all appealing, and the twist end was done very will. For a newcomer, your going to be better off starting with the first two, but if, for some strange reason, can't this will be a good starting point and one of the best in the series.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
javis10Jan 11, 2012
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, an excellent film by mexican director Alfonso Cuarón. I admire him and not only because I'm mexican too. He understood very well the magic of the book. Impressive images, excellent musciHarry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, an excellent film by mexican director Alfonso Cuarón. I admire him and not only because I'm mexican too. He understood very well the magic of the book. Impressive images, excellent musci by "maestro" John Williams. This is the movie that show us to continue our lifes and have a good frinedship. It really shows how love is powerful against the darknest. ¡BIEN HECHO ALFONSO CUARÅ Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
AquophisDec 28, 2011
Not as good as the first two, I'm afraid - I wasn't too fond of the inconsistent art direction. The three leads were inexplicably strutting around Hogwarts in their street clothes rather than their usual school robes. While it lacks much ofNot as good as the first two, I'm afraid - I wasn't too fond of the inconsistent art direction. The three leads were inexplicably strutting around Hogwarts in their street clothes rather than their usual school robes. While it lacks much of the warmth and whimsical enchantment of the first two films, and the transition into "dark and gritty" may come across as abrupt to some, the more subdued mood of the movie fits in well with its events - a murderer IS on the loose, after all. Overall, it's a great movie and a satisfying adaptation, but the other ones are better.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
TheGorillaDec 18, 2011
This installment has some depth, and it's enough mature, unlike the first two childish ones.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
heyitsmegrif4Dec 17, 2011
With strong performances stand out Emma Watson, thrills, a great score, great emotional depth, and dazzling visuals make this one of the best of the potters. I give this film 90% of a good movie.
6 of 10 users found this helpful64
All this user's reviews
9
Potter17Dec 11, 2011
Alfonso Cuaron made a true revolution in the series. He grasped the story and made the story flows quickly and smoothly. He also gave to the franchise a visually stunning look, a dark and more matured tone that Harry Potter deserves. It is aAlfonso Cuaron made a true revolution in the series. He grasped the story and made the story flows quickly and smoothly. He also gave to the franchise a visually stunning look, a dark and more matured tone that Harry Potter deserves. It is a shame that he only directed this movie and not the entire franchise… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
spadenxDec 2, 2011
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Overall it was another basic HP film that doesnt really do much for the series. While it does start to make use of the older cast members, The acting from the young cast members is probably some of the worst in the series (A lot of over acting from them).

Also the film is rather corny through out and it doesnt even come close to the emotional feel that the book had.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
10
Jboy2468Nov 22, 2011
A new director, a new mood. Things are getting darker in the wizarding world, and the director shows this perfectly. The story starts to really build up, and many new characters are introduced well. Professor Trelawney's strange ways areA new director, a new mood. Things are getting darker in the wizarding world, and the director shows this perfectly. The story starts to really build up, and many new characters are introduced well. Professor Trelawney's strange ways are presented with outstanding character and Sirius Black really captures who he is as a person. Another 10 for Harry Potter!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
asylumspadezNov 20, 2011
Probably the best film in the series. You not only see a huge increase in skill for the younger cast but you finally see them put the older cast members to some use. I think the long run time is pushing it a little though. The script doesntProbably the best film in the series. You not only see a huge increase in skill for the younger cast but you finally see them put the older cast members to some use. I think the long run time is pushing it a little though. The script doesnt really do that good of a job transitioning from book to film and it doesnt do a good job of explaining.

Also I think Michael Gambon was a great addition for the re-casting of Albus Dumbledore.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
marnee96Nov 4, 2011
This Harry Potter is imaginative, dark, well acted, complex and visually dazzling. Alfonso Cuaron came in and maintained the story of Harry Potter but also gave it a fresher, more vivid feeling than that of Chris Columbus'. 4/4 stars.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
grandpajoe6191Sep 23, 2011
Finally, a harry potter movie that starts childlike and ends with maturity! Bravo Alfonso Cuaron!
14 of 17 users found this helpful143
All this user's reviews
9
JawsPapi87Aug 9, 2011
A surprising improvement on the first and second installments in acting, artistic elements and emotional involvement in the story. It was darker and with this darkness came a more real movie, plus a pretty cool climactic battle
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
CRLJul 27, 2011
Prisoner of Azkaban's cinematography itself blows you away, and the world of Hogwarts leaps from the screen almost as well as Pandora (and without the help of 3D). Several new great characters (and actors) enter at this point, stirringPrisoner of Azkaban's cinematography itself blows you away, and the world of Hogwarts leaps from the screen almost as well as Pandora (and without the help of 3D). Several new great characters (and actors) enter at this point, stirring darker themes up for the first time. The storyline is also my favorite of the series, and this movie sticks to the source material incredibly well. Emotionally charged, incredible acted, and superbly directed, this is easily for me the best movie of the series.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
10
HasrionaJul 20, 2011
Much better than the first two, with a new dark feel and magical essence, Prisoner of Azkaban leaps to cinematic brilliance with an enchanting cast, compelling storyline and a truly wondrous tone throughout. It's sublime, and certainly one ofMuch better than the first two, with a new dark feel and magical essence, Prisoner of Azkaban leaps to cinematic brilliance with an enchanting cast, compelling storyline and a truly wondrous tone throughout. It's sublime, and certainly one of the best Harry Potter films.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
prudent00Jul 14, 2011
That statement that this film is the best of the set is incontrovertible!

Stylish, menacingly darker, engaging and the funniest movie of the franchise. Alfonso has done an amazing job in the seat of the director, as has john Williams withThat statement that this film is the best of the set is incontrovertible!

Stylish, menacingly darker, engaging and the funniest movie of the franchise. Alfonso has done an amazing job in the seat of the director, as has john Williams with the soundtrack, the cinematographer and the CGI wizards.

The only drawback is the questionable appointment of Michael Gambon as the replacement of the late Sir Richard Harris for the role of Albus Dumbledore. E.g. he personifies this character with an Irish accent simply because he thought it was a good idea, and he never reads the source material from where his character is derived from and only depicts his characters in a way he that reflects his own personality (grumpy, dull and moody). Hence, we lose the mystic and omnipresence that personifies Dumbledore in the novels.

Enough of the little snag, don't let it spoil the movie because this is the best of the set.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
AVCITYJul 12, 2011
Magical. By making Harry's inner struggles the center of the film, Alfonso Cuaron has made a visual masterpiece with rich emotional depth. The film doesn't linger on the sets and classes for too long, a liberty well taken after two previousMagical. By making Harry's inner struggles the center of the film, Alfonso Cuaron has made a visual masterpiece with rich emotional depth. The film doesn't linger on the sets and classes for too long, a liberty well taken after two previous ventures in the same setting. Instead he enhances the world through Harry's point of view. The film is emotionally darker and much more engaging. The visuals are superb, the score the best of the series so far and the cinematography outstanding. And as always the cast is top notch. This is not just a good movie for Harry Potter, it's a great film period.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
AlnORTIZJul 11, 2011
Prisoner of Azkaban is certainly darker and creeper than the first two films and books in the Harry Potter series. But that's why this is my favorite film in the series. Once again, the performances and story are all amazing in this film, asPrisoner of Azkaban is certainly darker and creeper than the first two films and books in the Harry Potter series. But that's why this is my favorite film in the series. Once again, the performances and story are all amazing in this film, as well as the direction this film went towards. But the visuals are a real treat because of how dark toned they are! This all makes up to be a very worthy addition to the film series.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
filmtrashreviewJul 6, 2011
So the third film takes a much darker route then the first two. I don't mind the darkness and acclaimed best Potter film but this is the shortest and yet it feels like the longest of the films. This film was dumbed down to Hollywood standardSo the third film takes a much darker route then the first two. I don't mind the darkness and acclaimed best Potter film but this is the shortest and yet it feels like the longest of the films. This film was dumbed down to Hollywood standard and honestly I don't feel that this director saved the series at all. The twists in this film are a lot better then "The Chamber of Secrets" and the new look of Harry Potter is visually stunning but I still feel that the filmmakers thought audience members were stupid. They included a pointless segment of the Willow Tree just to show the changing of season. We dealt without this in the first two films, why do we need it now? The only reason that I can think of is the fact that the art direction was completely lacking in this film. We couldn't tell the changing of seasons without those pointless Willow Tree shots and on top of that every character seems to now be wearing fashionable clothing. When watching the behind-the-scenes of this film I found out that the actors were allowed to choose what they wanted to wear. I feel in doing this, Alfonso and his crew wanted to make a summer blockbuster more then the wanted to make a good fantasy film.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
MovieLonely94Jul 5, 2011
Harry Potter learns that someone is after him and that person is known as Sirius Black. As he and his friends start their third year at hogswarts, they encounter new dangers that lie just ahead of them as they try to prove whether Sirius isHarry Potter learns that someone is after him and that person is known as Sirius Black. As he and his friends start their third year at hogswarts, they encounter new dangers that lie just ahead of them as they try to prove whether Sirius is innocent of not killing his parents or not. This was the only Potter movie that I've missed in theaters. That was pretty sad. Now to my opinion. Like the first two movies, there's nothing negative to say about this one. The actors were very entertaining (again) and I can say nothing more about Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, or anyone else. The only actor that I have to say to is Michael Gambon for his wonderful performance as Professor Dumbledore. The CGI was cool (again) and even the action was cool (again). The storytelling was amazing and the storyline was well-paced. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is a magnificent third entry of the Potter franchise with a lot of depth to the third book of the series. 8/10… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
jimmytancrediMay 29, 2011
This and the Goblet of Fire are unique in the saga. Both were directed by directors who didn't make any other drive then. What made them both very different from the others, that here was a great result! The most bucolic of the saga, the bestThis and the Goblet of Fire are unique in the saga. Both were directed by directors who didn't make any other drive then. What made them both very different from the others, that here was a great result! The most bucolic of the saga, the best performance of John Williams soundtrack (especially the beautiful Buckbeak's Flight) and the cast far more grown up. A little heavy, this film begins the process of maturation of both the characters and the fans, which may even scare some parents off guard, but the unique beauty of this unique film saga makes it worth taking a chance on him. Cuaron's direction has improved a lot and the course of the series. The director has several moments of great creativity throughout the film. Most infidelity script from the book than the first two films also helped a lot to the improvement of the series, since this was much less tiring than its predecessors. The junior improved performances (Rupert Grint decreases in the faces), but Radcliffe, disappointing especially in the scene where he discovers a secret about Sirius Black and starts crying (pathetic performance in this scene). Technically also represented a major advance. This movie has the best visual effects for the whole saga. The Buckbeak, the Dementors, the Animagi and werewolf are just fantastic. In addition, the trail of John Williams is the better of him in the series (Buckbeak's Flight is wonderful). There is also a beautiful photograph.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
TheQuietGamerMar 19, 2011
Another fantastic Harry Potter movie, fans of the previous movies will enjoy, fans of the books should enjoy I personally don't know if you will as I did not read any of the books but I don't see why you wouldn't, one of the best in the series.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
S_HenagerMar 10, 2011
Of all the Harry Potter movies, (with the possible exception of 7.1 and 7.2), this feels most like its own movie. Yes, it has similarities in plot and characters with the book, but it doesn't feel like as much of an adaptation as the otherOf all the Harry Potter movies, (with the possible exception of 7.1 and 7.2), this feels most like its own movie. Yes, it has similarities in plot and characters with the book, but it doesn't feel like as much of an adaptation as the other movies, and doesn't feel as chained to the books.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
DramaStormFeb 16, 2011
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Hello, everyone! I am DramaStorm. And this is my review for the third Harry Potter Movie: Prisoner of Azkaban. Well, this movie is simply really great. There's no two ways about it. Harry and his friends are trying to solve yet another mystery while trying to keep up with their magical schoolwork. Well, thankfully, they are able to save more than just one innocent life in this film and nobody dies. The best part of this movie: When Harry saves himself from getting destroyed by the Dementors. The worst part of this movie: LOL, probably the mishap at the Dursley's house. But you've got to admit, it was pretty funny. Fin.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
gm101Jan 20, 2011
A decent adaptation, but felt there were kinda too many changes from the book. This used to be my least favorite Harry Potter movie, until the Half-Blood Prince movie came out and took that honor.
0 of 3 users found this helpful03
All this user's reviews
5
Film_Fanatic_15Nov 22, 2010
The third time around didn't charm me as well as the first two movies in the franchise. They changed the director, which had a big effect on the overall tone of the movie. It was dark and unrelenting to watch. The only thing that appealed toThe third time around didn't charm me as well as the first two movies in the franchise. They changed the director, which had a big effect on the overall tone of the movie. It was dark and unrelenting to watch. The only thing that appealed to me was how it ended and the magical scenery around Hogwarts. The rest, I could forget about it. There never was a bright moment in the movie, and the only thing Harry has to hold onto is his two friends, Hermoine and Ron. Harry has enemies, he has friends. He still hasn't fully understood that he will in the end have an epic battle with Voldemort because he has an ultimate desire too. Lord Voldemort is very powerful, but his lurking presence around the halls of Hogwarts doesn't frighten him as much as it used to. The director gives us an uncomfortable viewing experience that I wan't happy with and wish this doesn't happen again in the next film.… Expand
2 of 9 users found this helpful27
All this user's reviews
10
MasternoNov 20, 2010
this one is the best in the series. i have watched all of them even the nr.7 and i liked this best out of all of them. it felt so alive and magic with those things and all that happened the same year at the school. you gotta se it. my listthis one is the best in the series. i have watched all of them even the nr.7 and i liked this best out of all of them. it felt so alive and magic with those things and all that happened the same year at the school. you gotta se it. my list from top to bottom is first Nr.1 Harry Potter 3
Nr.2 Harry Potter 4
Nr.3 Harry Potter 1
Nr.4 Harry Potter 7 Part 1
Nr.5 Harry Potter 6
Nr.6 Harry Potter 2
Nr.7 Harry Potter 5

But still if i have a list all of them are good though. all of the harry potter movies can i see again… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
GoldenEye16Aug 21, 2010
Definitely not as good as the first to. I feel like it lacked the craft, beauty, and authenticity of the first two films and was really immature, especially at the end. I don't understand how you can end a movie, especially Harry PotterDefinitely not as good as the first to. I feel like it lacked the craft, beauty, and authenticity of the first two films and was really immature, especially at the end. I don't understand how you can end a movie, especially Harry Potter with that last scene/image. It really felt cheesy when it should be majestic and beautiful. It wasn't bad but really I didn't like it as much.… Expand
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
10
nboley08Aug 16, 2010
Might be the best of the series. It's certainly the most impressive visually, as Hogwarts, which sometimes felt as thrilling as a funeral home during Columbus' films, comes vividly alive in the third film. Sirius Black is such an intoxicatingMight be the best of the series. It's certainly the most impressive visually, as Hogwarts, which sometimes felt as thrilling as a funeral home during Columbus' films, comes vividly alive in the third film. Sirius Black is such an intoxicating and great character, he really ties the movie together greatly. This was arguably Rowling's peak in the series.… Expand
22 of 26 users found this helpful224
All this user's reviews
5
GavGav96Aug 15, 2010
High on special effects and much more spooky, funny and mature than the two previous films, but the direction seems to be a lot more lazy than the other films. This has resulted in my least favourite in the whole series (this far)
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
5
jalalA.KJul 27, 2010
BRILLIANT!
0 of 3 users found this helpful
9
HelpUJul 19, 2009
Man, this is like the last good movie and last good book in the Harry Potter series rolled into one. Mildly confusing if you didn't read the books though. It actually alludes to how lacking of logical emotion the series will become.
2 of 3 users found this helpful
2
MiguelT.Jul 16, 2009
By far the worst Harry Potter movie. The adaptation is horrible, and the story-telling is lousy. The director gives a lot of time to stupid details [the bus, the spider-book, the boggart class...] instead of telling important passages in the By far the worst Harry Potter movie. The adaptation is horrible, and the story-telling is lousy. The director gives a lot of time to stupid details [the bus, the spider-book, the boggart class...] instead of telling important passages in the story. And, the worst of all: the ending. The ending SUCKS. Looks like they ran out of money. Fortunately this was the only movie directed by Cuaron.… Expand
0 of 4 users found this helpful
3
AustinM.Jan 8, 2009
This one just doesn't give me that feeling the first two gave me and it lacks the action of the 4th and 5th films. By far the worst so far.
3 of 23 users found this helpful
8
derekbNov 3, 2008
I am a huge fan of the harr potter series, i have only read the first 2 books but i have watched all the movies and i was more impressed with the 2nd film more than the rest of them, but im reviewing the 3rd one, i thought it was good, I am a huge fan of the harr potter series, i have only read the first 2 books but i have watched all the movies and i was more impressed with the 2nd film more than the rest of them, but im reviewing the 3rd one, i thought it was good, sometimes during the film i lost interest but the fact that harry wanted to avenge his parents when he finds out the guy responsible is on the loose and looking for him, he wants to kill him and i love it when harry is doing anything to find this man....the darkness of the film kept me interested and some didn't but overall this film was just Ok...i give it an 8 because im a fan of the harry potter series and although it didn't impress me as much as the 2nd film, it's still good.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
CCJul 29, 2008
Excellent film.as always the central trio undermine the fantastic story and characters with wooden performances and overall dislikability but theyre poor acting is not enough to overshadow awesome stints from Oldman,Rickman and Thewlis to Excellent film.as always the central trio undermine the fantastic story and characters with wooden performances and overall dislikability but theyre poor acting is not enough to overshadow awesome stints from Oldman,Rickman and Thewlis to name but a few. its hilarious to read the geeky fan-boys reviews stating how poorly the director adapted their beloved rowlings book to film when we all know theyre clearly in the wrong.cuaron did a masterful job with a difficult piece of childrens fiction and should have stayed on to direct the other films rather than allowing rank amateurs to toe the line as rowling had intended all along.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
AdnanAJul 19, 2008
Now this movie has been praised for turning away from the book and creating something new and different. Personally, changing things is the weakest point of this movie. If you haven't read the book then you'll either find it very Now this movie has been praised for turning away from the book and creating something new and different. Personally, changing things is the weakest point of this movie. If you haven't read the book then you'll either find it very confusing or you'll love it, but if you've read the book then nothing will stop you from finding faults and flaws. The story... well If they just wouldn't have deleted some main plots, it would have been as good as its predecessors. Not including the plots from the book is understandable but introducing new things is unacceptable. Acting... the trio have matured very much and I'd still say they were born for these roles. All the adults are great as usual. The two new actors, David as Lupin was perfect but Michael Gambon as Dumbledore... oh boy! Erase what I said in the beginning about the alterations in the plot being its weakest point. No! Michael Gambon is the weakest point of the movie. He sucks big time!!! He has tarnished the Dumbledore portrayed by the versatile actor Richard Harris and the character created by the prolific writer J.K.Rowling. Michael Gambon - one of the major reasons why I disliked the movie, the other reason was the tiny whomping willow. Direction... I don't know why Warner bros removed Chris. It's not that Alfonso is not talented, but changing a director breaks a smooth flow which was found between movie 1 and 2. Sorceror's and chambers felt like it was from the same world but this movie feels like a whole new world, only the characters are same. Chris had improved upon chamber of secrets by making it dark and suspenseful and with prisoner he would have made a hell of a movie (mean it in a positive manner). Visuals... for a 2004 movie it's visuals are excellent. Even today they look fantastic! Overall I'd rate this movie a B+. I would have given it an A if the director hadn't changed the small details which makes it very different from the books and the predecessor movies.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
JonLDec 15, 2007
Too episodic to be great, but visually sumptuous and with an actual director at helm, shows the world with far more creativity and authenticity, rather than a visualization of the novels, which aren't much good in the first place.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
0
RitaS.Sep 22, 2007
Seriously, it needs to be redone. Professional reviewers, most of whom have no idea what the book is about, give it a good review because of what? The special effects? The "dark"ness? Did they read the book? Did the !@^%$#!&! director even Seriously, it needs to be redone. Professional reviewers, most of whom have no idea what the book is about, give it a good review because of what? The special effects? The "dark"ness? Did they read the book? Did the !@^%$#!&! director even read the book!?!?! Or did someone just give him a 2 minute summary of it and he made the movie out of what he could remember from it? How did JKR agree to this? Did she even? I can only imagine her feelings of horror as she watched her book getting murdered. It seems these questions will go unanswered. Feels like scenes were mixed up and a lot of stuff has been horribly changed and a lot has been left out. Good thing the director didn't stick around for the fourth part. Good riddance.… Expand
0 of 5 users found this helpful
9
JonathanF.Aug 28, 2007
Fantastic, very close to the best in the series.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
TomK.Aug 19, 2007
Cuaron did genius work ignoring the previous of Chris Columbus. The third film in series is matching the film in style, it's darker and deeper. The work that Elfonso Cuaron did changed the Harry Potter film forever, for good.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
RuanHAug 12, 2007
The most engaging and entertaining film of the series to date. This is Harry Potter, darker and more serious than before. Good adaptation from the book.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
SophieJul 31, 2007
Really, not just an excellent Potter movie but a genuinely good movie on its own. I don't think it's as good as Order Of The Phoenix, but still, excellent job. Emma Watson was good in this movie, and it's a shame she Really, not just an excellent Potter movie but a genuinely good movie on its own. I don't think it's as good as Order Of The Phoenix, but still, excellent job. Emma Watson was good in this movie, and it's a shame she hasn't delivered that same performance.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
ChrisDJul 13, 2007
Firstly if anyone else uses the phrase magical to decscribe the harry potter movies I will break their legs. It's so annoying. Also this has been the best film so far. The first two, Radcliffe couldn't act or make anything look at Firstly if anyone else uses the phrase magical to decscribe the harry potter movies I will break their legs. It's so annoying. Also this has been the best film so far. The first two, Radcliffe couldn't act or make anything look at all natural. At least there was a slight increase in acting quality there. Also I thought the effects were well included and didn't look out of place. And also no need to keep comparing them to the books, as it is obviously very difficult to transpose an entire year into pictures and keep the pacing reasonable.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
TapangaJun 26, 2007
I did not like the cliffhanger at the very end otherwise I would've given Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban a 10.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
4
KarlK.Sep 5, 2006
It's not as magical as the first two films. The sounds were also very poor, it doesn't seem to compliment the mood of the scenes. The only thing I liked about the movie was the environments were more detailed. Over-all, it was a It's not as magical as the first two films. The sounds were also very poor, it doesn't seem to compliment the mood of the scenes. The only thing I liked about the movie was the environments were more detailed. Over-all, it was a bit disappointing.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
9
RaghuM.May 31, 2006
A great movie.Infact the best of the lot.This movie possesses a certain warmth and security that was absent in the earlier Harry Potter films.The visuals are spectacular, so is the casting and direction.Alfonso Cuaron deserves all the A great movie.Infact the best of the lot.This movie possesses a certain warmth and security that was absent in the earlier Harry Potter films.The visuals are spectacular, so is the casting and direction.Alfonso Cuaron deserves all the accolade he is getting for putting together a polpular yarn into the big screen without displeasing most fans and critics.I was rather amused to see this film as my expectations were very low after being treated to two dry affairs previously.I would have given the movie a rating of 10, if it had not been for the miscasting of Dumbledore and that screaming Sirius Black poster.Michael Gambon is a decent Dumbledore,but he doesn't meet the poignant expectations created by the late Sir Richard Harris.I still firmly believe that Sir Ian Mckellen would have made an excellent Dumbledore. Overall a great movie recommended for any Harry Potter fan.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
ChristinaP.Jan 5, 2006
The best movie(and the goblet of fire) i've ever known! i live HARRY POTTER!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
5
AndreaDec 15, 2005
I just finished watching the first 3 Harry Potter films on DVD, in preparation for seeing the fourth film in the theatres tomorrow. Watching the films in this way really emphaszies how different the third film is from its predecessors. If I I just finished watching the first 3 Harry Potter films on DVD, in preparation for seeing the fourth film in the theatres tomorrow. Watching the films in this way really emphaszies how different the third film is from its predecessors. If I had not seen the first two films I would probabyl have rated this film a bit higher, but what bothered me was that this director chose to change both the scenery and Hogwarth's structure/routines. I liked that the first two films played up Hogwarth's similarities to traditional English boarding schools, and I was especialyl disappointed to see that this new director chose to "modernize" so many things (including the street clothing the characters wear for much of this film). Most significant is the castign change for the role of Professor Dumbledore. Another reviewere noted here that Dumbledore is the centre of the novels, and it's important to really feel that he's trustworthy as a leader. The late Richard Harris was wonderful; the new actor plays Dumbledore as a bit of a joke, and this bothered me. Dumbledore is portrayed in this film as a doddering old man, which is absolutely contrary to the books themselves and to the prior 2 films. All in all, this film will probably be most appreciated by people who haven't read the books or seen either of the previous films.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful
10
BrianGNov 22, 2005
The best Harry Potter movie in the series.
1 of 1 users found this helpful
9
LeeC.Nov 20, 2005
Great, but not as good as the fab book! Emma Watson and that are other guy(Cedric Diggory) are absolute gorgous (not together). I don't think Ron and Hermione should get together, Hermione is way to good for Ron.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
ScottC.Nov 17, 2005
Absolutely fantastic!!
1 of 1 users found this helpful
9
HarryPotterRules!GinnyWeasleyRocks!Oct 20, 2005
I realy liked all the action in it, I recomend it to ages 9+
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
MaddieS.Sep 27, 2005
From what I've seen people either adore this film or loathe it.I personally adore it. I think the actors are great (spesh Dan Radcliffe!) even though Richard Whats-his-name was actually better than Michael Gambon. The special effects in From what I've seen people either adore this film or loathe it.I personally adore it. I think the actors are great (spesh Dan Radcliffe!) even though Richard Whats-his-name was actually better than Michael Gambon. The special effects in the film are great as well and as I want to be an actress when I'm older I wish I could have acted in it. I can't wait for the 4th film to come out (Nov. 18) and I'm also waiting for the 7th book. As you can see I'm an avid Harry Potter fan. Apparently the 5th film is out in 2007.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
10
ChrisSep 24, 2005
This one is definitely the best out of the first three movies. It seems much darker than the others and no longer feels like a film just for the kids. The graphics have improved a lot and so has the quality of the acting. Definitely a thumbs This one is definitely the best out of the first three movies. It seems much darker than the others and no longer feels like a film just for the kids. The graphics have improved a lot and so has the quality of the acting. Definitely a thumbs up 10/10.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
next
Page:
More From This Movie

82 Critic Reviews

8.3 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 77 Project Hail Mary
2 75 Send Help
3 73 Hoppers
4 72 The Sheep Detectives
5 68 Crime 101
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL