Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
Warner Bros. Pictures | Release Date: November 18, 2005
7.8
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 1247 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
1,012
Mixed:
147
Negative:
88
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
8
DimitrisB.Jan 11, 2006
It is good film like other three.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
JeffP.Apr 4, 2006
I gave this film an 8, I have read all the books, my basic run down starts from 10, it lost one point for missing a few senses and lost another point for being a little hard to follow if you haven't read the books or seen the other I gave this film an 8, I have read all the books, my basic run down starts from 10, it lost one point for missing a few senses and lost another point for being a little hard to follow if you haven't read the books or seen the other three movies and thus know the characters. However we must all remember that when things change from book to movie that it's not going to be the same. The book was over 600 pages long, to fit everything the movie would have to be almost 4hours and 30 mins long. Some of us (me) wouldn't mind that but that hard to do with some people. All in all good movie likeable characters (even if one of them isn't explained entirely in their emotions to me (ron)), always room for improvement of course. Can't wait to see more.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
StephNov 21, 2005
the film was really good and far better than i expected! it is well worth going to see!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
JoeB.Nov 20, 2005
As one who has not seen the other three HP movies, I can't rate it in comparison, but I thoroughly enjoyed this film. Although I have read through book four, it has been a while, and did not remember every important aspect of the As one who has not seen the other three HP movies, I can't rate it in comparison, but I thoroughly enjoyed this film. Although I have read through book four, it has been a while, and did not remember every important aspect of the plotline. Nevertheless, I was quite satisfied with this adaptation of the novel. The guy that played Moody was superb, and Maggie Smith was hilarious as always.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
TomT.Nov 20, 2005
Considering a majority of the book was kept out, this film was fantastic. It flowd well, was fast-paced, yet didn't feel rushed or leave one confused as its predecessor is. Voldemort's performance was delicious: who would have Considering a majority of the book was kept out, this film was fantastic. It flowd well, was fast-paced, yet didn't feel rushed or leave one confused as its predecessor is. Voldemort's performance was delicious: who would have thought a young, agile, passionate creature would emerge from that...thing? No complaints here from someone who has disliked all movies preceding...… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
TriciaP.Dec 3, 2005
Perhaps even an 8.5...not as good as the third film but still very good, and entertaining. I've read the books and was glad because much was left out of this movie, by necessity; however, the film was much more of a thriller than its Perhaps even an 8.5...not as good as the third film but still very good, and entertaining. I've read the books and was glad because much was left out of this movie, by necessity; however, the film was much more of a thriller than its predecessors, and could easily be enjoyed without having read the books. Even knowing the plot and ending, I hated to leave the theater for even a moment.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
JackieAug 8, 2006
I must admit, I liked this movie. Lots of people are saying that it is not true to the book, but think about it. There is no way a book that is over 700 pages long is going to fit well into a movie. They put the parts into the movie that I must admit, I liked this movie. Lots of people are saying that it is not true to the book, but think about it. There is no way a book that is over 700 pages long is going to fit well into a movie. They put the parts into the movie that will be important later in the movies. I admit, I was disappointed with the parts about Nevilles parents; if you haven't read the books, you would defiantly miss that little bit in the Pensieve where Kakaroff mentions his parents. Harry should have talked to Dumbledore about it afterwards. It would take 5 minutes. Then we could cut that stupid dragon scene. Does Harry really need to be flying around the castle all the time?… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
BobX.Nov 18, 2005
Just saw it, pretty decent flick but if you need more assurance you can see that Michael Scraglow has given it his patented seal of crap low ratings. A Scraglow high rating is the kiss of death.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
DaveNov 19, 2005
I have read all of the books, only once though. The 3rd movie dispointed me quite a bit, changing much of the plot from the book. Going into this movie I was still expecting a lot and was generally not let down. Considering the amount of I have read all of the books, only once though. The 3rd movie dispointed me quite a bit, changing much of the plot from the book. Going into this movie I was still expecting a lot and was generally not let down. Considering the amount of content from the book...700 some pages, I think a good job was done in boiling the book down to its core so that it would work as a movie. There are many bits, some small others not, from the book that have been left out, but only a few of them I would have liked to see in the movie. Special effects were great, and I liked the "horror-movie" musical score, it seemed to help create suspense quite well. The acting has improved significantly, Harrys tears at the end seemed believable and true and Ron's jealousy was played well. Overall a good movie, not great but enjoyable.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
MitchellF.Nov 21, 2005
I can help but wonder what the movie would be like if they went by the book. Although this was a good adaptation if the forth book, and had great special effects...they tried to pack a 600 page book into 2 hours and 17 minutes. It was I can help but wonder what the movie would be like if they went by the book. Although this was a good adaptation if the forth book, and had great special effects...they tried to pack a 600 page book into 2 hours and 17 minutes. It was skipping all over the place. All in all I recommend this movie for all you Harry Potter fans. The effects are great, the acting is good and Emma Watson is hot.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
JenB.Nov 26, 2005
Very enjoyable but it felt a big long. My favourite scene was Hermione appearing in her ball dress - after putting up with Ron's crap for so long it was fantastic to see her get one back. The whole adolesence/relationship thing was I Very enjoyable but it felt a big long. My favourite scene was Hermione appearing in her ball dress - after putting up with Ron's crap for so long it was fantastic to see her get one back. The whole adolesence/relationship thing was I thought in the end more enjoyable than the 'magic'. Both my kids loved it, and hey after all isn't that what it's all about. Although my son, (14) questioned why they left so much out. Personally I'm glad they left Dobby out and Hermione's obsession with the rights of house elves, but he liked those bits in the books. Different people like different things I guess. I recommend it.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
MarkB.Nov 28, 2005
The first two films in the series, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone and...Chamber of Secrets, directed by Chris Columbus, resemble what Harry Potter movies would look like if Harry's school chum Ron Weasley had been a film The first two films in the series, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone and...Chamber of Secrets, directed by Chris Columbus, resemble what Harry Potter movies would look like if Harry's school chum Ron Weasley had been a film director: like Ron, Columbus is generally quite competent at what he does, often a bit better when he applies himself, and generally he gets the job done. Potter movie #3, ...Prisoner of Akzaban, done by Alfonso Cuaron, resembles the work of Hermoine Grainger: smarter and more talented than most other folks out there, but trying so hard to make an impression or put an individual stamp on the material, that the result was more than a little off-putting (as the film's slightly disappointing box office and middling Metacritic viewer score illustrates). Mike Newell, who helmed ...Goblet of Fire, does so like Harry himself in his 4th year at Hogwarts: definitely facing some daunting challenges, he does so successfully and with confidence. As several other posters noted, Newell's and writer Steve Kloves' hardest task was to whittle down a 700-plus page book into a two and 1/2 hour film, and there's no question that something gets lost in the translation: I really liked the book's funny but heartfelt subplot involving Hermoine's lonely battle for House Elf Liberation, which is nowhere to be found here, and certain minor but significant characters (like Miranda Richardson's delightfully tart tabloid reporter Rita Skeeter) get significantly shortchanged. (On the other hand, my favorite Potter supporting figure, the endearingly clumsy Neville Longbottom, gets HIS role increased!) A friend once observed that perhaps J.K. Rowling's books would be better translated as TV miniseries than movies, because it wouldn't matter how long they ran and nothing would have to be omitted. I can't argue too much with her, but given what it was required to do, ...Goblet of Fire streamlined and intensified Rowling's material admirably. It focuses on the four-contestant wizard's contest almost out of the starting gate (Rowling doesn't really start on it until after over 300 pages); it allows the film to snowball in intensity as it goes along, successfully raises the stakes on the life-or-death importance of Harry's battles with Lord Voldemort, and allows Newell to show off his special-effects / action movie skills (which have grown considerably since his one other contribution to the fantasy-horror genre, 1980's forgettable Charlton Heston Egyptian mummy opus The Awakening). That's why the Hogwarts' formal ball that occurs midway through the film works as well as it does: it serves as intermission, comic relief, character analysis, study of the Hogwarts' kids as adolescents...and a chance for Newell to temporarily return to the skillful light but perceptive romantic comedy vein he handled so well in Four Weddings and a Funeral, Enchanted April and Pushing Tin. Best of all is Daniel Radcliffe, who continues to grow wonderfully as an actor in the title role; he perfectly communicates Harry's growing emotional complexity, fear and pain, especially at the climax of the final challenge: no wonder Newell employs so many close-ups of him! The actor has grown from "nice kid, but any teenager with a British accent can do this role" to "nobody in the world besides this guy could play it"! Radcliffe could very possibly join Sean Connery in the select group of actors who could very conceivably enjoy a long career in both a series-defining movie role AND in a series of challenging film roles outside the series: I'm really looking forward not only to the final 3 Potter installments but also to what parts Radcliffe has the capability of pursuing outside of Hogwarts Academy!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
MarkLDec 8, 2005
This is by favourite Pooter book (so far) but I had bad feelings about the film. Just how do you cram a 600+ page book into a reasonable film length? And when the film started, I though I saw this unfolding, the first half hour is madly This is by favourite Pooter book (so far) but I had bad feelings about the film. Just how do you cram a 600+ page book into a reasonable film length? And when the film started, I though I saw this unfolding, the first half hour is madly rushed and misses out on so much of the book. But after Harry gets picked for the tournement it gets a lot better. The ball, which I didnt take to in the book, works perfectly on screen and its great fun seeing Harry and Ron trying to score. The finale is transerred perfectly to screen and doesn't lose any of the awe. So this is a very good film and adaptation of the book. I think Azkaban worked slightly better just because of the sheer length of material this had to cram in, but 4*s overall. One thing though- isn't the whole tournement a bit of an eloborate way just to get Harry to touch a port key?… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
SteveL.Jan 27, 2006
Very good movie. I've never read any of the books so I am judging it on its own merits. Parts in the middle were a bt slow (e.g. anything involving dancing), but the action scenes delivered.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
BillW.Nov 18, 2005
Enjoyable film, but a bit too fast-paced and many great characters (and major ones to boot) barely get any screen time. Unfortunately (and admittedly), Michael Gambon has never read the books and us a complete flop as Dumbledore, rudley and Enjoyable film, but a bit too fast-paced and many great characters (and major ones to boot) barely get any screen time. Unfortunately (and admittedly), Michael Gambon has never read the books and us a complete flop as Dumbledore, rudley and loudly pushing his way around the movie, which is the last thing the character would ever do....… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
SangheeJ.Nov 22, 2005
None of the brilliance of the original books, but it was definetly the best of the three. The humor factor distracted me and made me laugh, so I didn't dwell on the negative during the movie, which made it much more enjoyable. Definetly None of the brilliance of the original books, but it was definetly the best of the three. The humor factor distracted me and made me laugh, so I didn't dwell on the negative during the movie, which made it much more enjoyable. Definetly more entertaining than the previous three, and a good movie. However, there were many characters left out, such as Winky, Ludo Bagman, Dobby, and the whole tickle-pear portrait was gone as well. there were major differences, but it was, as I said, much better than the last ones.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
MikeN.Nov 24, 2005
What this movie needed was less action and more exposition. Seriously. There are, after all, worse things than having exposition in a movie. Such as leaving your viewers with no friggin idea what the hell is happening. And this is pretty What this movie needed was less action and more exposition. Seriously. There are, after all, worse things than having exposition in a movie. Such as leaving your viewers with no friggin idea what the hell is happening. And this is pretty much what happened to me in the final twenty minutes of this film. I had a few moments of confusion early on, but I was pretty much following along until the final maze sequence, where events start moving very fast, nothing is explained and then, as a final, crowning insult, Harry Potter actually asks his school headmaster exactly what happened (took the words right out of my mouth, Harry) and, in reply, the old Professor mumbles two words --- in Latin--- and that, apparently, is supposed to explain that. Now, keep in mind that I have read Goblet of Fire, albeit some time ago. And, strangely enough, I've read Latin as well. Despite these facts however, I did not find that a short mumbled Latin phrase constituted an intelligable explanation of the end of this picture. My daughter has subsequently explaned it to me and I now understand it (I guess). I think, however, that it would have been bette r to make the story clear without forcing people to resort to an external gloss. That said, the movie is extremely beautiful and, more than any of the previous films, manages to make the school seem alive, perhaps simply because many more extras are employed. The CGI is superb and the magical effects generally manage the important trick of not looking like effects. The acting is up to or above previous standards but everything does seem a little rushed. In particular the major villian's return at the end of the film unwinds almost comically fast. A villian has to be given time to generate some sense of.... evil. All that Fiennes generates is a sense of being in a hurry.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
SeamusNov 28, 2005
Good but where was the quiddich match?
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
JonLDec 15, 2007
Doesn't handle the angst as well as it should, but otherwise another finely crafted and thrilling build on the series as a whole.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
GoldenEye16Aug 21, 2010
A very good and exciting movie that goes by the book reasonably well. It was really fast-paced and there was loads of action. However I wish two things better. First, the maze for the third task did not have any of the obstacles orA very good and exciting movie that goes by the book reasonably well. It was really fast-paced and there was loads of action. However I wish two things better. First, the maze for the third task did not have any of the obstacles or creatures from the book. Why take that out and put in really nothing is kind of stupid. Also, I really wish that they had Voldemort with his hood on like the book covers/illustrations. It really looks cooler that way and more menacing.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
SchroederRockFeb 13, 2014
Where the Prisoner of Azkaban saw a transition process from lighter fare and youth appeal, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire steps into an obviously-darker world where the student of Hogwarts begin to deal with realities that are yearsWhere the Prisoner of Azkaban saw a transition process from lighter fare and youth appeal, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire steps into an obviously-darker world where the student of Hogwarts begin to deal with realities that are years beyond them, mostly due to the growing influence of Lord Voldemort. The result is the best Harry Potter yet - one that will rope in more mature audiences while still remaining somewhat enjoyable for the younger viewers.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
MovieLonely94Jul 5, 2011
As Harry Potter and his friends begin their fourth year at hogswarts as well as meeting new friends from their respective schools, a Tri-Wizard tournament has just been taken place and only three students have been chosen. Now the fourthAs Harry Potter and his friends begin their fourth year at hogswarts as well as meeting new friends from their respective schools, a Tri-Wizard tournament has just been taken place and only three students have been chosen. Now the fourth student to overcome that event, little does Harry Potter know that the servants of the Dark Lord are planning to reborn their master as he encounters all three of these tasks. I was amazed and speechless (not to mention frightened) when I saw this dark and epic entry of the series and I was excited to see it taking the franchise into new heights. The actors did a lot of talent and charm of the now changed personalites of the characters, The action and CGI were pretty unique and very intense, The storyline from the fourth book stayed faithful and Ralph Fiennes deserved some credit (as well as the others) for his amazing performance as Lord Voldemort. Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire is the most darkest entry of the series that took the franchise into new heights in fantasy history and one of the best movies from the past five years. 8/10… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
8
HasrionaJul 20, 2011
An enjoyable, thrilling and alluring entry with better acting than the first three and some captivating debut performances. Itâ
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
8
JawsPapi87Aug 9, 2011
This is an incredibly entertaining movie. It has intense action sequences, solid performances all around and maybe the most interesting new characters in the whole series, such as Professor Moody.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
8
Potter17Oct 11, 2011
It has a more childish tone when compared to the dark tone of "The Prisoner of Azkaban" but Mike Newell gave a solid adaptation of a very extensive and detailed book. I think this is the last time in the series when a non-reader can reallyIt has a more childish tone when compared to the dark tone of "The Prisoner of Azkaban" but Mike Newell gave a solid adaptation of a very extensive and detailed book. I think this is the last time in the series when a non-reader can really understand the story.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
grandpajoe6191Sep 23, 2011
The movie's story is very linear. However, the Potter cast & crew makes the story very easy to follow. Overall a enjoyable summer blockbuster you can't miss.
6 of 10 users found this helpful64
All this user's reviews
8
ZilcellMay 25, 2012
Its most likely not the best Harry Potter, but the action and story are still pretty good after multiple sequels.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
StevenFJul 14, 2013
There is a lot going on in the fourth Harry Potter film, love is in the air, there is a magical wizarding tournament happening in Hogwarts and Harry Potter is beginning his fourth year, Mike Newell certainly has the eye for a set-pieceThere is a lot going on in the fourth Harry Potter film, love is in the air, there is a magical wizarding tournament happening in Hogwarts and Harry Potter is beginning his fourth year, Mike Newell certainly has the eye for a set-piece extravaganza, the new film is brimming with them. But we are also introduced to the darkest tale yet of the ongoing adventure, with the introduction of one of the most frightening characters to appear on screen.
But Harry, played again by the ever growing Daniel Radcliffe, and his ever tolerant friends Ron (Rupert Grint) and Hermione (Emma Watson) have their friendship with the leading man tested to its core when Harry's name is picked from the Goblet of Fire, something only seventeen year olds or over can do, Harry is then a true public enemy within the school as many wonder, including Harry himself, how is name was entered, when Harry says it wasn't him?
As the hostility and suspicion grows around Harry, we can see that this is a very different Potter film than we have seen before, the whole friendly shock and awe of 'this is magic' is gone, and we are shown a very credible threat to Harry and to the wizarding world, we have heard about Death Eaters, and we see them rein terror at the beginning of the film, they are signalling a return to power, a return that we don't have to wait too long to see.
With a large plot and addition of two wizarding schools for the Triwizard Tournament comes a much larger cast, we see the the likes of Snape (Alan Rickman) McGonagall (Maggie Smith) and various other characters make sporadic appearances, but we are introduced to an array of new faces, Viktor Krum (Stanislav Ianevski) a Triwizard 'champion' and Fleur Delacour (Clémence Poésy) the same. We also have Ralph Fiennes and Brendan Gleeson added to the cast. This indeed can be off putting as a reader of the book, simply because of the limited screen time these characters and actors receive, but also for the amount of scenes that obviously had to be removed.
There can be a sense of rush while watching the movie, even though it clocks in at over two and half hours, but when the film hits a high note, it hits it with some force, combining its riveting story with some spectacular special effects, including a frightening and edge of your seat chase through a maze and a fight in the air with a dragon.
Its clear to see how far the franchise, the story and the real life actors involved have come in four years, how much the story has developed into a less child friendly and more gritty approach, but being as faithful as they can to the source material, another epic adventure has been created, and certainly starts quite the interesting chain of events.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
spadenxDec 2, 2011
I think its easily the best film in the series so far. The acting is far better then it ever has been in the series and the older cast members have an expanded role as well (which is good). The confrontation at the end of the film is the peakI think its easily the best film in the series so far. The acting is far better then it ever has been in the series and the older cast members have an expanded role as well (which is good). The confrontation at the end of the film is the peak of the film and makes the film well worth watching for that alone.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Bruce722Dec 31, 2012
This movie easily has the most changes in terms of book-to-movie out of the four movies thus far. However, while there were many changes, this is also based on an incredibly long book so I totally expected it. Out of the changes, however,This movie easily has the most changes in terms of book-to-movie out of the four movies thus far. However, while there were many changes, this is also based on an incredibly long book so I totally expected it. Out of the changes, however, only one really bugged me. I hated what they did with Dumbledore's character. After Harry's name gets called by the goblet, he goes absolutely berserk in the movie and even shoves Harry. This never even almost happens in the book and is so outside of the character established already that it felt wrong. Nonetheless, if I try and look at it strictly from a moviegoer's perspective, it was probably the best of the movies so far. The acting was better than in the prior three, the plot progressed more smoothly, and the effects seemed better... especially the dragon sequence. While I wish they would've stuck more closely to the great book, they did do it justice. I would say I only deducted 2 points from the 10/10 maximum for the change to Dumbledore's character and for the fact that there seemed to be a couple of points in the movie where I would've missed what was happening if not for having read the book already. It's easy to get ahead of the movie somewhat if you already know the entire story so I might be exaggerating this effect somewhat but I thought it stood out. Still, this was a very good movie and I look forward to finishing the series.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Tss5078Dec 2, 2013
Since I got into the Harry Potter series a few months ago, I've been asking people what they think of it. To my surprise, most of them said they stopped after the Prisoner of Azkaban. Personally, I think Azkaban was the best one so far, soSince I got into the Harry Potter series a few months ago, I've been asking people what they think of it. To my surprise, most of them said they stopped after the Prisoner of Azkaban. Personally, I think Azkaban was the best one so far, so why not continue? The unanimous answer was that they didn't really want to see the kids grow up. In the Goblet of Fire, they aren't quite there yet, as in their 4th year at Hogwarts, the kids are 14. The story this time isn't centered around some mysterious artifact or person, but rather a world wide competition of student wizards. The Goblet of Fire decides who the best of the best are, allowing only one student from each school to participate. This film was special, but also lacked some of the intrigue that got us addicted to Harry Potter in the first place. Finally, a Harry Potter film focuses entirely on Harry and we get to see some of the great things that he is supposedly capable of. In fact, Ron and Hairmony's roles amount to little more than bit parts, where as in the other three films, they were all on equal ground. The fact that this was a competition takes something major away from the film. In the Goblet of Fire we aren't introduced to any new artifacts, games, or spells, there really isn't anything here that will amaze you. While it's a small thing, it's an expected thing, that does take something away from the film. What makes up for it is a terrific ending, that has to be seen in order to continue on with the series. For years, I thought Harry Potter was just overrated, pop culture, bull but once I sat down to actually watch it, I came to realize that this series is as magically as the world it portrays. Every one of the first four films has been fantastic and I can't wait to see what the future has in store for the wizards of Hogwarts.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
JrAgujaIsAGleekMay 27, 2014
When I watched it before becoming a Potterhead, this was my favorite HP movie. It still stands today as my favorite, for now.

But it wasn’t the same as before. I was amazed by the story that time before I got a chance to read the book. IWhen I watched it before becoming a Potterhead, this was my favorite HP movie. It still stands today as my favorite, for now.

But it wasn’t the same as before. I was amazed by the story that time before I got a chance to read the book. I was impressed with the book more than the movie.

Let me first start by saying about how much it was cut from the source material. I was upset at first, but then I remember how long the book and they cannot extend the movie longer. I understand why a lot of parts have to be cut.

But let me list down some of the things of the chances that I am not okay with because I felt like they’re unnecessary or they’re important to the story.

Hermione hugging Harry Potter before Rita Skeeter gets a chance to take a picture of them for more publicity of the Tri-Wizard Cup.
The scenes where Hermione was training Harry for the first task.
Mrs. Weasley, Dobby and Winky were absent in this movie. Those three characters had important character development, with the last two mentioned having important story development as well.
References of Dementors’ connection with Lord Voldemort is removed.

Despite the numerous cuts, I still enjoyed it. But it’s sad it comes along with the irritation of how many cuts it have to take for the required running time.

I feel like some parts of the movie might not be understandable to viewers who haven’t read the book beforehand. They would make sense to them if they do. This is a common problem for books being adapted into movies, though this problem is (kinda) solved for YA movies such as The Hunger Games and Divergent.

The humor is still retained in the movie which is good because Harry has some quite sassy humor in the books.

They showed Rita Skeeter but she wasn’t featured much in the movie. She is a lot worst when I read the books.

I give props to the scenes where the tasks were held. They were better than what I imagined.

The movie felt a bit of a teenager movie but then again, the characters are growing up and that shows maturity among the characters. This is actually good if you wanted a story about wizardry but it also has a sense of realism.

I like how the tone suddenly became dark in this one. I hope this isn’t an unpopular opinion.

I enjoyed the movie and this remains my favorite Harry Potter movie despite its flaws. I like the book better though, sad to say.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
OfficialNov 1, 2013
"Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire" is the fourth movie in the series and is the most complex and mature yet. Director Mike Newell has improved on the previous films on all edges and has made an excellent violent movie with style and craft.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
worleyjamersJun 7, 2013
The turning point in the series. The Goblet of Fire is probably my favorite HP film in the series. I loved the Tri-Wizard Tournament, and I really enjoyed Brendan Gleeson's performance as Professor Moody. Voldemort's first physical appearanceThe turning point in the series. The Goblet of Fire is probably my favorite HP film in the series. I loved the Tri-Wizard Tournament, and I really enjoyed Brendan Gleeson's performance as Professor Moody. Voldemort's first physical appearance is what made the film for me; the film builds perfectly to a strong ending that really adds depth to Harry's character. Ralph Fiennes is terrific as the Dark Lord.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
shpreaJun 28, 2013
Definitely one of the best Harry Potter movies. It's full of amazing set pieces, such as giant dragons and elaborate mazes, all of which seem alive and realistic. The acting, as usual, is very good. It is a very entertaining and easy toDefinitely one of the best Harry Potter movies. It's full of amazing set pieces, such as giant dragons and elaborate mazes, all of which seem alive and realistic. The acting, as usual, is very good. It is a very entertaining and easy to follow Harry Potter movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
mds03Apr 14, 2013
I thought that this one's action scenes and climax were awesome compared to the previous one. I especially liked how Voldemort finally came into the picture again after his absence in the third film. If you are a fan of the first three, thisI thought that this one's action scenes and climax were awesome compared to the previous one. I especially liked how Voldemort finally came into the picture again after his absence in the third film. If you are a fan of the first three, this one is simply a must see.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Movie1997Sep 8, 2013
While (in my opinion) it at first felt like it wasn't going anywhere as far as telling a story relating to the purpose of the books, it starts to feel more and more engaging as far as storytelling goes up until the big point in the movie.While (in my opinion) it at first felt like it wasn't going anywhere as far as telling a story relating to the purpose of the books, it starts to feel more and more engaging as far as storytelling goes up until the big point in the movie. Overall, truly eventually got better and better the further into this movie. Be sure check out my YouTube channel, "TheMovieManLife" for all things movies.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
nickrovertOct 24, 2013
'The Goblet of Fire's intriguing plot makes it one of the more tense films of the franchise, however, like its predecessor, its story line is mostly unimportant.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
RayzorMooseNov 13, 2013
Harry Potter bewitches a four installment with impressive entertainment.
The Goblet of Fire proves Harry is far from done, and that being a wizard really is all its cracked up to be.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
AaronWasserman2May 4, 2014
Harry is on a streak, because Goblet is a blast. The film runs on the long side but doesnt feel it because you get so invested in the story and characters. what a great time. keep it up Harry.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
DBPirate1129Jan 11, 2015
While it is the first installment in the HP series to be a step down from its predecessor and though it may have more book changes than the rest, Goblet of Fire has amazing storytelling and special effects that make it a strong installment.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
MovieManiac83Apr 23, 2015
Faced with the challenge of adapting an immensely popular 700-page-plus book to film, knowing full well that virtually every cut would be greeted with wails from the book's millions of fans worldwide, director Mike Newell and screenwriterFaced with the challenge of adapting an immensely popular 700-page-plus book to film, knowing full well that virtually every cut would be greeted with wails from the book's millions of fans worldwide, director Mike Newell and screenwriter Steven Kloves made an entirely reasonable decision: They cut virtually everything from Harry Potter And The Goblet Of Fire that would be redundant with the previous three movie adaptations of J.K. Rowling's record-breaking bestsellers. Gone from the story: the usual intro featuring Harry Potter's obnoxious relatives, any scenes of the boy wizard learning or experimenting with magic, most of the conflict between him and his rival Draco Malfoy, and so forth. What's left isn't quite lean and propulsive: At over two and a half hours, it's still bulky, and a handful of scenes drag dubiously, while the opening and closing both feel rushed. But whenever it hits its stride, it's a well-acted, vividly executed, full-speed-ahead special-effects extravaganza that puts as much bang as possible into every remaining scene.

The fourth installment in Rowling's Harry Potter series catches up with the returning cast of the first three movies as they enter their fourth year at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry, where a traditional three-school wizarding competition is about to be held. Against his will and against the rules, Potter (Daniel Radcliffe) gets dragged into the competition, though not before a great deal of setup involving portentous dreams, the Quidditch World Cup, and the inevitable arrival of Hogwarts' new Defense Against The Dark Arts teacher (Brendan Gleeson). Much of the movie is devoted to the contest, which lends itself to explosive setpieces involving dragons, mermaids, and a malevolent hedge maze, but Newell and Kloves manage to wedge in a great deal of economical setup and fulfillment, with foreshadowing, backstory, and intercharacter conflict all pared down to essentials but still given room to breathe.

By this point in the story, it's unlikely that the Harry Potter movies are going to win many new converts; to their credit, Newell and Kloves don't really try. With its slam-bang-whoosh-giggle-gasp mentality, Harry Potter And The Goblet Of Fire could be a halfway decent thrill ride for newbies to the series. But its less-explanation, more-momentum mentality is really aimed squarely at the fans, who'd likely rather see more well-timed business from their favorite characters than a pile of dreary exposition and reminders about the story to date. For all its length, Goblet Of Fire speeds past all too quickly. But the real accomplishment may be that for all its brevity, it still feels like it tells the important parts of Rowling's story.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
FrenziedPanda99Jul 17, 2015
In my opinion , the best film of the Harry Potter saga , coming from an exciting idea of JK Rowling about a tournament of sorcerers where pontificate (again ) the interpretations of the three main characters, Hagrid ( Robbie Coltrane ) and aIn my opinion , the best film of the Harry Potter saga , coming from an exciting idea of JK Rowling about a tournament of sorcerers where pontificate (again ) the interpretations of the three main characters, Hagrid ( Robbie Coltrane ) and a debutant Alastor Moody ( Brendan Gleeson ) .… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
kyle20ellisMar 25, 2022
I liked this film very much. It is much darker than the previous outings, but not as faithful to the source material. The only thing I didn't like so much about the book, was the subplot about Hermione trying to help house elves. It was cute,I liked this film very much. It is much darker than the previous outings, but not as faithful to the source material. The only thing I didn't like so much about the book, was the subplot about Hermione trying to help house elves. It was cute, but interfered too much with the dark overtones of the narratives. The film looks dazzling, especially the ballroom scene. Speaking of that scene, I adored that dress that Hermione was wearing, Emma Watson looked unrecognisable in that scene.Also the music by Patrick Doyle this time was beautiful. I don't think it's as dark as the book, and I wasn't too keen on some of the casting. Roger Lloyd Pack and David Tennant were fine in their roles as the Crouches, but their characters were changed significantly. I did wish they made Crouch's disappearance more mysterious, instead of giving it away, ruining the suspense that was quite compelling up to that scene. I am not too keen on Michael Gambon's Dumbledore, I just don't remember Dumbledore being violent as they made him. As I've said already, I much prefer Richard Harris as the character. I am also on the fence about Mad Eye Moody. Brendan Gleeson is a very talented actor, evident in films like In Bruges and The General. He looked the part, but his voice wasn't exactly what I had in mind for Moody. I have listened to the audio tapes by Stephen Fry, and I imagine Moody's voice as low and gravelly. Although Gleeson mostly succeeded with his role, I personally think he tried too hard. My brother also noted that he didn't like the execution of the three tasks. I didn't like the third task, and the other two were fine. I did think on a positive note that Ralph Fiennes as Voldemort was suitably scary, and with the exception of Dumbledore everyone else was well done. All in all, a flawed but quite engrossing film, that doesn't quite live up to the darkness of the book. 8/10 Bethany Cox… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
aadityamudharApr 17, 2016
The movie's story is very linear. However, the Potter cast & crew makes the story very easy to follow. Overall a enjoyable summer blockbuster you can't miss.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
PanchogulDec 4, 2018
Solía ser mi favorita en su momento, actualmente la veo y la encuentro demasiado "teen" para una película de Harry Potter pero pese a ello no le quito mérito alguno, es buena.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
FuturedirectorApr 14, 2017
Harry Potter and the Globet of Fire is still conserving the darkness and eye-catching mystery of its predecessors. And thanks to its every-time-better interpretations and it's smart storytelling, there's no way it cannot truly soar.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Aaron_WassermanMay 31, 2016
Another great installment in the Potter franchise, even darker than Azkaban. I really enjoy this movie, it is the most fun of the 8 films. The triwizard tournament are some of my favorite moments in the potter movies.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
eva3si0nOct 28, 2018
The excellent movie in the saga. Upon the 4th part is critical in a series, the Dark Lord has appeared. And the movie acquaints us with Devourers of death. I advise all to viewing.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
Jk9785Nov 11, 2018
This is a great film, though not quite as magical as Potter number three. This is the first PG-13 Potter film, and it definitely shows. Certainly the darkest of the first four.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
CoreGamer1408May 19, 2022
Never read the books. Quite a tense grim fantasy for sure. I think I prefer this older Harry Potter and so do the little kids in family. Looking forward to the follow up movies.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
cameronhalmansJan 9, 2019
The Gobblit of Fire adds something to this franchise that it didn’t have before. Conflict between the three main characters, an incredibly entertaining and adventurous Gobblit of Fire, and finally a story of the past that isn’t boring toThe Gobblit of Fire adds something to this franchise that it didn’t have before. Conflict between the three main characters, an incredibly entertaining and adventurous Gobblit of Fire, and finally a story of the past that isn’t boring to watch, that has believable weight, emotion, and consequences. As the three main leads get older, they become so much more. A great film. Can’t wait to see where it goes from here.

74/100… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
TomtagApr 14, 2019
There was more darkness here. The movie showed us the main villain with his one and only plan. The story changed into competitions and proved that Harry Potter was much braver than the audiences thought
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
MrPajamasSep 8, 2020
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire is, in my opinion, the best part of the whole series. He has an excellent story with an excellent plot with a cup. Every challenge Harry has to go through here is excellent, and the revelation at the endHarry Potter and the Goblet of Fire is, in my opinion, the best part of the whole series. He has an excellent story with an excellent plot with a cup. Every challenge Harry has to go through here is excellent, and the revelation at the end really worked out. If I had to continue why this episode is my favorite, I'd get to the spoilers, which I don't want. The only thing I can write is that this is another excellent sequel from the Harry Potter series.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
benko13Oct 7, 2020
Most thrilling movie in the franchise, with epic ending of showing Voldemort at iconic graveyard scene. In Top Three HP movies with the Prisoner of Azkaban and Deathly Hallows part 2.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
geewahApr 21, 2021
One of the best Harry Potter movies.
What it does well is crank up the fear factor, particularly in the 2nd half and with that helps move this away from being a franchise just for kids.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
adzcantillasNov 25, 2021
Sportsmanship is what Goblet of Fire ending up talking of. You know what? Everyone does not throwing out grabbing shots playing Sports just knowing Sportsmanship. I'm like why not just embracing Fiascos 'n what not without PessimisticSportsmanship is what Goblet of Fire ending up talking of. You know what? Everyone does not throwing out grabbing shots playing Sports just knowing Sportsmanship. I'm like why not just embracing Fiascos 'n what not without Pessimistic Feelings if y'all may ask me.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
JJ2FAS4UDec 29, 2021
----------------------------------8.2/10-----------------------------------
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
GemsicleMar 17, 2022
The Prisoner of Azkaban was rated PG, just like the first two films; but this is the first in the franchise to receive a PG-13 rating due to more disturbing images and more adolescent characters. Heck, the opening scene shows a characterThe Prisoner of Azkaban was rated PG, just like the first two films; but this is the first in the franchise to receive a PG-13 rating due to more disturbing images and more adolescent characters. Heck, the opening scene shows a character being cast by the killing curse that we hear for the first time, but hear only a fraction of from the Chamber of Secrets.
An intriguing irony is shown in the beginning of the flick where Harry finally has a satisfying summer with the Weasleys abroad the loathsome Dursleys and even attends a Quidditch match for the big leagues along with them. Following an exuberant night with his generous pals, a hellfire emerges and anarchy ensues, symbolizing that each moment in the movie is becoming more darker and minacious than Harry’s previous adventures, making the images look virtually like a horror movie. Harry’s adventure this year covers an integration with two foriegn wizarding institutions, who are more preparatory as each enrolls only one gender and they are at Hogwarts to compete in the Triwizard tournament for an unretentive prize: an empty trophy-figured cup. The tournament is more like a fatal pop quiz for the underaged Harry Potter who has no means of escape for his qualification in the top-notch survival alley for training wizards, envisaged with dragons and undersea venoms. Sensitivity and virtuosity is the key to finding the exit from these arduous obstacles.
The triwizard tournament has a strict adolescent policy whereas all members must be at least seventeen years of age, equal to the lack of the Trace on wizards. While Harry Potter, only fourteen has his hat thrown in the ring with his normal fellow opponents and is believed that he will cheat his way through the competition and will refuse to watch him suffer the excruciating consequences, but with Harry’s speciality, he exert himself to prove his doubters wrong.
The legendary John Williams forwent to compose for Harry’s enrollment in the Triwizard tournament and that meant there is triumph, but less charm and delight manipulation towards the audience. We can understand that the actors are growing more adolescent as they make more footprints through Hogwarts and that also means how the crew are profoundly making the movies.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
AllistairE.Nov 18, 2005
Another long wait for a new Harry Potter movie and another long wait in line to see it. The first three films were overall faithful to the books, and had some of the best directing, casting, and art direction of the decade. The first had a Another long wait for a new Harry Potter movie and another long wait in line to see it. The first three films were overall faithful to the books, and had some of the best directing, casting, and art direction of the decade. The first had a wonderful joyous quality (my personal fav.), the 2nd had a great feeling of mystery, and 3rd (aesthetically the best) was awe-inspiringly beautiful and gloomy. They stood just as great as the books (although in my opinion nothing beats your imagination, so the books will always win by default). Now, with Goblet of Fire I found myself constanlty asking why. Why did they take that part out? Why did they add in the extra action? Why didn't they emphasize on that scene? I think the movie was victim to a poor script and a bland director, but still survives on the great visual set up that past directors have built and the wonderful cast. I know that with a book so big, cutting out scenes and characters was a necessary evil. But why did they make Dumbledore seem viscious at times? Why did they leave out some very lovable and interesting characters? Why didn't they take some time to make sense of what was going on and why? It came clear to me half way through the movie that for once the book and movie are very different. The movie on it's own feet is perhaps the most fun of all the movies and will hopefully be a bridge to 3 much more susperior films. If you read the book the whole thing feels like a slide show (trust me, your friends will be constanlty asking "why did that happen....what was that part about?), but it's still a good time and fun to see things come to life on the big screen. Anyway, it has Jarvis Cocker and Johnny Greenwood, plus Emma Watson is a hottie. Worth your money and time.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
ErinNov 21, 2005
I loved the book so much, it was by far my favorite, so it was a little disappointing to see many of the sub-plots on the cutting room floor. The climax, the maze and battle, left a little to be desired.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
ClaireDec 4, 2005
Not a bad movie compared to the other Harry Potter films but they added and took off quite a bit off the original book. I suppose it's difficult to make a movie out of such a long book. . . anyway, the Voldermort scene was probably the Not a bad movie compared to the other Harry Potter films but they added and took off quite a bit off the original book. I suppose it's difficult to make a movie out of such a long book. . . anyway, the Voldermort scene was probably the best part but Cedric and Krum look about 30 years old.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
DavidB.Dec 4, 2005
Probably the best potter film yet, yet I did not like the Voldemort adaption at the end... I feel they could have done more with it. However, the rest of the film is great and anyone who likes Harry Potter will dig this film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
AnonymousJan 18, 2006
The book was the best of the six... but the movie didn't stay true to it... Should have made it longer, regardless of childrens attentions spans of an hour and a half Lame excuse to make a good story short.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
RyanD.Jan 21, 2006
Too many short cuts were taken to make fans of the book truly love this movie. Movie goers will enjoy this story, But real fans are still gonna have to wait for a Great Harry Potter movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
KyleL.Feb 10, 2006
I like the Harry Potter movies and this is just like the previous...entertaining. It wasn't dull, yet I wasn't on the edge of my seat. Perfect for younger tweens!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
AndyO.Mar 7, 2006
Not my favorite of the series, and NOT because the movie left a lot out from the book (I prefer to read the books after seeing the movies, that way I don't miss anything), but just because I didn't think the movie was as good as Not my favorite of the series, and NOT because the movie left a lot out from the book (I prefer to read the books after seeing the movies, that way I don't miss anything), but just because I didn't think the movie was as good as those that came before it. Currently I believe Prisoner of Azkaban is my favorite, I wish they had used Gary Oldman's character more in this film as he's always been one of my favorite actors, and his part in the book was slightly bigger than the movie gave him credit. Can't wait for the next one in 2008 or whenever.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
TomK.Aug 19, 2007
The fourth film in series is better than the first too, but not better than the third one. it is matching the books in style and environment, but it's moving too fast and skipping important events from the book. Still, the movie stands, The fourth film in series is better than the first too, but not better than the third one. it is matching the books in style and environment, but it's moving too fast and skipping important events from the book. Still, the movie stands, but not as the third one.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
DalePMay 12, 2008
Agree with Tom K. The third movie is by far the best.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
A.d.W.Nov 18, 2005
Seemed very very rushed - almost should have made two movies out of the book - too much information for 1 movie - FX were great - The young actors were great and carried the movie, Watson and Radcliff are fine actors - I missed some of the Seemed very very rushed - almost should have made two movies out of the book - too much information for 1 movie - FX were great - The young actors were great and carried the movie, Watson and Radcliff are fine actors - I missed some of the previous 3 movies "touches" - the theme music is hidden in a new "darker" form which is missed and the music just wasn't as memorable as in the previous movies- Snape is not as menacing as he was in number 3 and Michael Gambon has got to read the books - his potrayal of Dumbledore was much much better in The Prisioner of Azkaban. He does push and shove his way through this one - which Dumbledore just doesn't have to do. Harry seems very slow to react and clueless in all the tasks yet he wins - I seem to remember the book to be like that so no real compliant - just kinda odd - one of the champions and he hasn't a clue - All in all a good film and much to like but I liked 3 better- Goblet of Fire just doesn't seem to have as much charm as Prisoner of Azkaban did.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
AlishaNov 19, 2005
Overall, this is an enjoyable film. But it left me wondering how much different it would've been had the visionary Alfonso Cuaron directed it. I have a feeling that all of its shortcomings come from it's inability to be adapted Overall, this is an enjoyable film. But it left me wondering how much different it would've been had the visionary Alfonso Cuaron directed it. I have a feeling that all of its shortcomings come from it's inability to be adapted well into a movie. I am not sorry that they cut out a lot of the plot from the novel, but the pacing was terrible and there were several loose ends that were never resolved. All of the key moments were cut short in favor of showy visual effects, and it left the viewer wondering what actually happened. At some points it seemed as if Steve Kloves and Mike Newell were having an argument about which plot points should be admitted into the film, and then as a compromise they would introduce the point, but never resolve it. Its predecessor, the Prisoner of Azkaban, was a much better FILM, while this movie probably was better when it comes to what Harry Potter fans are looking for.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
FixatingNov 21, 2005
I enjoyed it...but I could have done with less sweeping panoramic shots of the landscape and more of the story. I'll be interested to see what was cut when the dvd comes out.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
EstebanF.Feb 24, 2006
No, I didn't go out with the feeling of "What the heck was that!?". The movie is pretty good, the effects were unbelievable, but the movie was obnoxiously cutted. Yeah, obnoxious is the only not-curse-word that I can use to describe the No, I didn't go out with the feeling of "What the heck was that!?". The movie is pretty good, the effects were unbelievable, but the movie was obnoxiously cutted. Yeah, obnoxious is the only not-curse-word that I can use to describe the cuts. The book was amazingly better. In fact, it was one of the better ones, tied with the phoenix order (that's the directly translated name, I don't know the exact English name), and only being outstanding by the 1st book. I'm totally sure that this movie had the better effects, but talking about plots, it was the worst one. I felt a bit disillusioned after that, specially of the not-so-scary Voldemort. This absolutely destroys my expectations. Anyways, a good movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
DerekH.Mar 24, 2006
Very entertaining. Many people seem to be claiming that those who haven't read the books surely couldn't follow this plot. Not so. I vaguely remember seeing the first two films, skipped the third (I'll get around to it), and Very entertaining. Many people seem to be claiming that those who haven't read the books surely couldn't follow this plot. Not so. I vaguely remember seeing the first two films, skipped the third (I'll get around to it), and have never touched the books, but Goblet of Fire made plenty of sense to me.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
ChelseaNov 22, 2005
I must say i both loved and hated the movie. i adored the book and was terribly dissapointed that many things were not only left out but changed. for one thing, winky the house elf conjured the dark mark, not barty crouch jr. and i wasI must say i both loved and hated the movie. i adored the book and was terribly dissapointed that many things were not only left out but changed. for one thing, winky the house elf conjured the dark mark, not barty crouch jr. and i was dissapointed at the way the end of the world cup was handled: harry falling down and being unconscious until all havoc has been wreaked was really humiliatingly silly. i didn't like dumbledore and his rough treatment of harry. he is supposed to be calm and wise. i didn't like the way the maze part of the tournament was handled...where were the skrewts and giant spiders? and victor krum was not very scary while under the imperius curse. i was dissapointed with voldemort....that scene was so important and it was not very scary. voldemort by the way, is supposed to have red eyes. this may be important later because mrs. norris has red eyes and i have an inkling she is one of the horcruxes. however, i loved the rest of it, have seen it twice and i do happen to like the comic teenage moments. though the dancing bauxbatons and fire conjuring durmstrangs were dumb. i love the awkwardness of the jealousy and anger that harry, ron and hermione show as their relationships grow and are tested. the dragon was awesome. the pensieve is just how i imagined it. hagrid in love was awesome. i only wish they had stuck to the book more, included dobby, winky and more of serius...calmed dumbledore...etc., but i have to keep telling myself "this is one interpretation of the book". ah, well...maybe cuaron will be asked to direct the last one (his version of azkaban was beautiful and spot on).… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
JimG.Nov 27, 2005
The best book so far in the series is translated as well as seems possible. The intensity of key scenes in the book is very difficult to capture, and given the limits of time they seem less intense here and fly by quickly. But what is there The best book so far in the series is translated as well as seems possible. The intensity of key scenes in the book is very difficult to capture, and given the limits of time they seem less intense here and fly by quickly. But what is there keeps one glued to the screen for the entire time.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
DrewH.Dec 23, 2005
Good but can you really compare it to the book, i feel bad for people who watch these movies and dont read the books, they are missing out.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
7
sreekiranFeb 10, 2011
movie is good and decent. the thrill ride of 3 competitions are really exciting. one of the better movies of harry potter saga. the movie could"nt get 8 or 9 due to its length and dragged first half.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
asylumspadezNov 25, 2011
What you see in this film is something you dont see much in the other films, The characters growing up. You see the characters deal with the problems of growing up and that is something I rather enjoyed. The acting was ok. The older membersWhat you see in this film is something you dont see much in the other films, The characters growing up. You see the characters deal with the problems of growing up and that is something I rather enjoyed. The acting was ok. The older members of the cast were great while the younger cast did over-act quite a bit and I didnt enjoy them as much as the others.

While the film (that runs nearly 3 hours) takes a toll on you while you watch it and can get a bit boring at times, The ending more then makes up for it (The ending is easily the best part of the film). Still though, Its an enjoyable film and one of the best in the series.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
jimmytancrediMay 29, 2011
So many things to comment on this movie, I'll hold me in two, one is the soundtrack, since I failed to mention the three previous films, and I love so much. We also have a change of director, this being the first Briton to take the saga.So many things to comment on this movie, I'll hold me in two, one is the soundtrack, since I failed to mention the three previous films, and I love so much. We also have a change of director, this being the first Briton to take the saga. Talking about the soundtrack, I love that John Williams did, but this film surpasses it be so... The arrival of Patrick Doyle has only increased my devotion, I confess that this change was great, John Williams was great, but there was something missing... What about Mike Newell, the first Briton to direct a film of the Harry Potter saga, a good choice, everything works, the rush is visible, noting that the possibility of division into two movies, the book is huge, had already been contemplated in with various things out in the book that only you can find the answers. Even so, Mike Newell managed to hold the bar, showing all that should be showing the Quidditch World Cup, Triwizard Tournament, the Yule Ball and the return of the Dark Lord, despite the ludicrous speed, I was thrilled with everything, everything, every Following is wonderful! The big problem is the same speed, should have more time each event of this magnitude. And if he had abused a little more time, he took the place still held by the Prisoner of Azkaban, the best film ever made.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
CRLJul 27, 2011
When I first saw Goblet of Fire, I probably would have called it the worst of the series. Since then however I've come around and realized why its flaws weren't that bad. As a fan of the books, the first thing that turned me off was howWhen I first saw Goblet of Fire, I probably would have called it the worst of the series. Since then however I've come around and realized why its flaws weren't that bad. As a fan of the books, the first thing that turned me off was how much was cut from this movie. However (unlike Part 2), the director kept the most important parts and managed to piece it together to make it seem like nothing was missing, and now it doesn't feel as bad. The acting, as always, is superb. The special effects are some of the best of the series, and the Ralph Fiennes makes an incredible entrance. It's not the best, but it's not as bad as it could have been.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
imthenoobJan 28, 2012
The first thing I really liked about this film is how it had moments (such as Ron and Harry looking for dates) that werent really in the book but are put in to prove its not all about magic, There is a lot of personal things happening asThe first thing I really liked about this film is how it had moments (such as Ron and Harry looking for dates) that werent really in the book but are put in to prove its not all about magic, There is a lot of personal things happening as well. The acting is good ,as expected, and the action is good. I didnt really enjoy the film that much until Voldemort got into the picture, the only good part of the film imo was Harry's entire confrontation with Voldemort. I just couldnt get into it.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
beingryanjudeAug 25, 2014
Despite a now annual director change, Harry Potter continues to shine bright. The Goblet of Fire is complex and shows true signs of maturity. The cast has also begun to follow suit. May the greatness continue!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
cameronmorewoodNov 8, 2012
I'll admit the gang has grown up a bit, and not all the magic of the first three films is present here, but Goblet of Fire is still a visually captivating fantasy adventure that is packed with surprises and some well done action sequences.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
sil3nt_nickMar 24, 2013
This film would have been fantastic if they hadn't left out so much from the book.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
joao1198pedroNov 28, 2013
the goblet fire wasn't as good as the prisoner of azkaban but it was another great movie from the franchise,it finally have an dark touch wich will do great business up ahead.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
homer4presidentMar 13, 2015
This was probably the weakest of all the Harry Potter films but I still liked it. The climatic scene of Voldemort's resurrection seems more "Broadway theatrical" than actual "return of the mass wizardry killer".
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
SrPepeJan 3, 2018
Una película entretenida con escenas muy buenas y memorables, pero no supera a sus compañeras.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Jaredc324Jul 18, 2019
Epic, fierce and leading to a more bolder, adult vision. Harry Potter and friends are thrust into the rambunctious sensibility of Mike Newell's touch and it results in the most emotional, comedic and energized Potter film yet. That doesn'tEpic, fierce and leading to a more bolder, adult vision. Harry Potter and friends are thrust into the rambunctious sensibility of Mike Newell's touch and it results in the most emotional, comedic and energized Potter film yet. That doesn't mean its the best, but its definitely the most appealing.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
FilipeNetoFeb 12, 2018
New director, franchise improved.

This film is the adaptation of the fourth book in the saga of Harry Potter, written by J. K. Rowling. Alfonso Cuaron, who directed the previous film, leaves the franchise and gives way for Mike Newell, whichNew director, franchise improved.

This film is the adaptation of the fourth book in the saga of Harry Potter, written by J. K. Rowling. Alfonso Cuaron, who directed the previous film, leaves the franchise and gives way for Mike Newell, which comes almost as a contingency solution for the place. However, it was an excellent bet and gave fairly good results, with the film to show a marked improvement and the first use of massive and impressive special and computerized effects. It's also the first film where we see Harry Potter and his friends as teenagers they already are, a brand that comes up, very quietly, in the book, but Newell explores in this film, where the action and fight scenes also become more intense. The actors remain basically the same and fidelity to detail and descriptions of the original book is still evident. This film was one breath of fresh air in the franchise.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
JeBjBoJan 10, 2022
Probably my favorite out of all the Harry Potter films. Every role is perfectly cast and the set design is impeccable. But why is everybody (including Dumbledore and Voldemort) so f*cking horny all the time??
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
silbakkerJan 17, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. No faith with the book. But, I loved Robert Pattinson and the final battle.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
zNeverSleepingNov 2, 2019
Um dos melhores filmes da franquia. E a leitura dos livros, pra quem sabe aproveitar as duas obras, apenas acrescenta ao universo. É de emocionar...
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
glommanJan 23, 2022
I think I've watched this movie like 10 years ago and can't really remember anything but the trials and tribulations the contestans (Cedric, Harry, Krum, and Fleur) go through. After re-watching it a few days ago it's fair to say that this isI think I've watched this movie like 10 years ago and can't really remember anything but the trials and tribulations the contestans (Cedric, Harry, Krum, and Fleur) go through. After re-watching it a few days ago it's fair to say that this is a good extension of the Harry Potter franchise, but it still suffers from the same things that made the previous movies a little bit irritating for me to watch. It's a nice movie for people who like urban fantasy and young adult fiction in general, but I've kinda grown out of it, I probably won't like it as much, when I watch it again in ten years or so, if that makes any sense.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
Cementer200Sep 27, 2020
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire is a good movie. it's good see the harry potter movie series is still going strong.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
iCampoRamilJan 5, 2021
Una película cargada de simbología por todos lados, con el añadido de las pruebas, que luego hablaremos, que está graciosete, pero no es para tanto. Mantiene bastante el estilo de Cuarón, ese rollo dark/gótico está bastante bien, pero noUna película cargada de simbología por todos lados, con el añadido de las pruebas, que luego hablaremos, que está graciosete, pero no es para tanto. Mantiene bastante el estilo de Cuarón, ese rollo dark/gótico está bastante bien, pero no termina de convencer, no es tan redonda como su predecesora, ya que cambia un poco ese rollo detectivesco a más un drama adolescente.
Empecemos con lo bueno, las actuaciones, cada vez van mejorando, Emma Watson es una auténtica locura, sumada a una dirección de arte que parece que se supera en cada película, vestuarios y decorados escepcionales, y el diseño de producción, seguramente de lo mejorcito de la saga.
Lo malo, le falta consistencia, no sé por qué será, pero uno de los causantes es que ya no está John Williams a los mandos de la banda sonora, y eso, queramos o no, se nota, es menos potente. Lo de las pruebas, está graciosete porque el espectador se siente mejor narrado, con una estructura más clara y ordenada, pero en cuanto a montaje, se acaban haciendo sosas, no transmiten lo que tenían que transmitir, me pierde un poco.
Lo que hablábamos antes del drama adolescente, speaking facts, lo alargan demasiado, no me interesa, quiero ver magia, se hace demasiado larga en muchas partes por el simplemente hecho de incluir esos problemas de la adolescencia en pantalla.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
ConstantJan 11, 2006
HP4 suffers from heavy rhythm problems. You can tell from the directing that scenarists have struggled for months to fit the whole book into a 3-hour footage, yet at the end of the day so much is eluded and things stay at such a superficial HP4 suffers from heavy rhythm problems. You can tell from the directing that scenarists have struggled for months to fit the whole book into a 3-hour footage, yet at the end of the day so much is eluded and things stay at such a superficial level (dialogues never longer than 2 lines) that no pace can possibly install. Ironically for "too short a movie", you end up looking at your watch. Technically, it is good though (but who would rate a movie on its technical achievement? so easy nowadays), despite the age problem for the main actors, which can easily be abstracted. In a nutshell, not essential, less interesting than the previous one.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
JeremiahM.Apr 5, 2006
Chris Columbus staged his "Potter" as a kind of droll pageant, like a "Harry Potter's Greatest Hits" that inexplicably insisted on remixing every song, draining away their grungy vitality and blissful wit by burying them under a pyre of Chris Columbus staged his "Potter" as a kind of droll pageant, like a "Harry Potter's Greatest Hits" that inexplicably insisted on remixing every song, draining away their grungy vitality and blissful wit by burying them under a pyre of studio redubs, children's choirs, and "Home Alone"-level John Williams. Alfonso Cuaron reconceived of the series as a canny mix of the eccentric, the frightening, and the beautiful. His film is the one J.K Rowling had embedded in her story all along. Mike Newell, with "Goblet of Fire," comes to the preceding with a patience long-eroded by television, or "Mona Lisa Smile," or the sugar he might have compulsively consumed to "brainmeld" with the world's kids. His movie simultaneously feels repellently unmagical and drunk on the idea of magic. [***SPOILERS***] When Harry says, "I love magic," he's stepping far outside the confines of Rowlings verisimilitudinous world to be cute. And that's precisely where this film fails. Rowling crafts a world where magic is the order of the day, every day.At times, it's so familiar as to seem frustrating, or absurd. This movie loves magic and has the special effects to prove it in court, if need be. But where's the life behind it all? Not in Hogwarts' paintings, or in its musty halls: Newell has done the greatest disservice of all by imagining Hogwarts as a boarding school- Rowling's starting point- and then stopping. Instances of the novel or beautiful occur at precisely spaced intervals- namely, when the kids' patience might start to wear thin. Speaking of patience, Newell has none to speak of. He has conceived of "Goblet of Fire" as a three-act drama. Everything prior to and including the first challenge is Act One; suddenly, as if someone forgot to mention it, the Yule Ball and, shockingly immediately thereafter, the second challenge are upon us in Act Two; Act three has no structure to speak of but contains the good, Hammer-horror stuff from the book, slapped onto an unbelievably brief third trial. Are we to believe that after the dragon, that's all the tournament would have for Harry? Doesn't old Voldy (Ralph Fiennes, for Chrissake) need to slow down a little so that all those long awaited curses can be uttered? Doesn't Harry's adrenaline flow compensate for his youth by allowing him to experience the most climactic moment of his life thus far without feeling that it's all far too ephemeral? The whole affair seems ingloriously rushed, and Newell has so pounded our brains with vain special effects that when the really beautiful image of the wand-beams meeting comes about it feels like so much more of the same. Yes, Potter stories require the sum of effects present here. But no other Potter film has so shamelessly rubbed them in our faces. It felt like "Revenge of the Sith" all over again. Newell, to be fair, does much better with the humans in the film; this Potter, even more than Cuaron's, seems populated by breathing individuals. Apparently, directing Hugh Grant and Julia Roberts puts one at ease with the lesser celebrities of Potter's world, because Mike here has done an excellent job capturing the mannerisms, rough speech, and conflicted emotions of adolescence; he seems more at ease when relaxing with his cast than when sitting beside the editor or parsing through thousands of effects shots. The episodic nature must be due in part to Kloves, but I liked his work on the last one (and "Wonder Boys") so much I'm hesitant to blame him. To close, Rowling's "Goblet" was the least magical of the series so far; Newell's is on par with Columbus's for that title among the films. It doesn't fix any of the book's problems, but creates new ones; thankfully, it's all very well acted (kudos to Michael Gambon & Brendan Gleason). The film simultaneously is tiring and needs to be longer (to compensate for the rushed feel), and needs desperately for Rowling's whimsy to save it from its dour self.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
DerekP.Jan 17, 2006
I overall think it was worth the admission, but I would have liked to see Newell throw out the rulebooks and go for something outside of the box. Put his own stamp on it. I mean, you can't really go wrong with making such a film from a I overall think it was worth the admission, but I would have liked to see Newell throw out the rulebooks and go for something outside of the box. Put his own stamp on it. I mean, you can't really go wrong with making such a film from a great and appealing novel. But would someone please teach these kids how to act? Please.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
6
JoS.Mar 8, 2009
Good attempt at my favorite of the books. I think K P's response was head on. What made me love this book was the of course Goblet of Fire. But the Yule Ball seemed to last forever with the odd punkish band. After the Ball it seemed Good attempt at my favorite of the books. I think K P's response was head on. What made me love this book was the of course Goblet of Fire. But the Yule Ball seemed to last forever with the odd punkish band. After the Ball it seemed that they raced against time to catch up with the story and the 2nd competition was over before it even started.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
Page:
More From This Movie

81 Critic Reviews

7.8 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 77 Project Hail Mary
2 75 Send Help
3 73 Hoppers
4 72 The Sheep Detectives
5 68 Crime 101
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL