Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire
Warner Bros. Pictures | Release Date: November 18, 2005
7.8
USER SCORE
Generally favorable reviews based on 1247 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
1,012
Mixed:
147
Negative:
88
Watch Now
Stream On
Stream On
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
10
vivekthegameJul 13, 2011
its my favorite movie in the series till date... i have seen the first seven.. i liked Newell's style of making this film.. he didn't make this movie as dark and a little boring as its successors.. this film had everything from wonderfulits my favorite movie in the series till date... i have seen the first seven.. i liked Newell's style of making this film.. he didn't make this movie as dark and a little boring as its successors.. this film had everything from wonderful cinematography to good performances.. it also had the required amount of humor.. and the end sequences were awesome.. specially the return of the Dark Lord.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
marnee96Dec 28, 2011
This one is darker, more intense and funnier than previous installments. Teenage hormones have taken the forefront at Hogwarts, but so has a dangerous threat. The story and the characters are excellently adapted by Steve Kloves and it'sThis one is darker, more intense and funnier than previous installments. Teenage hormones have taken the forefront at Hogwarts, but so has a dangerous threat. The story and the characters are excellently adapted by Steve Kloves and it's brilliantly acted. I love all the Harry Potter films, but if I had to choose a favorite, Goblet of Fire would be it. 4/4 stars.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Jboy2468Nov 22, 2011
This movie shows the stresses of growing up, as well as the spirit of bravery. Harry is almost alone for half of the movie but yet he doesn't give up at all. There's no more of that kiddie stuff. This is a true representation of Harry and hisThis movie shows the stresses of growing up, as well as the spirit of bravery. Harry is almost alone for half of the movie but yet he doesn't give up at all. There's no more of that kiddie stuff. This is a true representation of Harry and his future. Yet another 10, Potter!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
javis10Jan 11, 2012
It is funny, creepy, and it has lots of amazing and wonderful action. But it will never get above Prisoner of Azkaban. But I am a huge fan so it was a good film.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
AquophisDec 28, 2011
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Loved the film's portrayal of the Yule Ball, and the teenage anxiety surrounding it. I was genuinely emotionally moved by Amos Diggory's anguish over the death of his son, and seeing Harry crying along with him augmented the scene's poignancy. No fantasy story is truly complete without some dragons, and the film doles out that particular justice with a truly awesome dragon and a truly awesome battle scene, if not without taking some liberties from the book. All in all, one of the best of the HP films.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
MegWhiteleyMar 28, 2012
One of the most better films ever!! This new movie of Harry Potter is really interesting, funny, amazing, incredible, with excellent effects. Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire is amazing.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
MonsieurEamesJul 12, 2012
Spectacular film. The kids are just as good of actors as the adults now. Oh, I love that trio so, so much! Goblet of Fire takes a more dangerous approach and has a very spectacular and interesting premise. Pure magic for the young & old.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
ratingmanJul 29, 2012
This is an amazing movie, first the plot is well done everything you need to know is in the movie even more ( i red the book ), the effects fitted well, then you can really feel the magic in this movie, with the soundtrack amazingly fittingThis is an amazing movie, first the plot is well done everything you need to know is in the movie even more ( i red the book ), the effects fitted well, then you can really feel the magic in this movie, with the soundtrack amazingly fitting the storyline, the acting was great also, this is one my favorites of the series, Nice Job.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
HaithamBayazeedMay 10, 2013
First of all the PG-13 is accurate, it is darkest and the scariest Harry Potter and his friends are now teens (romance alert) and there are defiantly so magical scenes with dark potion added to them, it is a fun yet entertaining ride thatFirst of all the PG-13 is accurate, it is darkest and the scariest Harry Potter and his friends are now teens (romance alert) and there are defiantly so magical scenes with dark potion added to them, it is a fun yet entertaining ride that absolutely deserves a 10! Meant for teens… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Pranay6Mar 15, 2014
At first I thought the movie was going to be lame. It started of with weak diolouge and then after 20 minutes in...I realized I was actually leaning forward in my seat with anticipation. This movie is awesome! I have to say the the DeathAt first I thought the movie was going to be lame. It started of with weak diolouge and then after 20 minutes in...I realized I was actually leaning forward in my seat with anticipation. This movie is awesome! I have to say the the Death Eaters, and the plot around them was awesome! The Dark Lord's raising a duel with Harry in the graveyard was stunning! This movie certainly had a creep factor at parts...which is great for the HP frachise!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
AReviewsJun 25, 2013
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire is visually stunning, dark and incredibly mature, with scary moments and romantic blooms, the PG-13 is accurate, and the story is thrilling, scary and dark, but still it is outstanding and awesome.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
DibbHansenJul 14, 2013
While not completely like the source material, it still keeps the same feel of the book- the intensity, the action, the fantasy (everything you can expect from a Harry Potter film). The film gets darker but continues on with its greatWhile not completely like the source material, it still keeps the same feel of the book- the intensity, the action, the fantasy (everything you can expect from a Harry Potter film). The film gets darker but continues on with its great acting, amazing visuals, great music (while John Williams is sadly missed, Patrick Doyle really steps it up and does not disappoint), set design and direction. This film is another grand slam success in the Harry Potter series.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
inaneswineNov 14, 2017
What's more frightening? Tackling a fire-breathing dragon or asking someone out on a date? Yet another improvement on its predecessors, Goblet of Fire is the funniest, most exciting, most emotional and most frightening Potter instalment yet.What's more frightening? Tackling a fire-breathing dragon or asking someone out on a date? Yet another improvement on its predecessors, Goblet of Fire is the funniest, most exciting, most emotional and most frightening Potter instalment yet. Radcliffe, Watson and Grint deliver their best performances thus far, showing a firm grip of the much darker and more emotionally challenging material here. Newell and Kloves ensure that the powerful material contained within its complex storyline is never lost; but they also manage to perfectly capture the angst and insecurity suffered by our adolescent heroes with a wicked sense of humour.

The ever-expanding ensemble are at the top of their game here, with top-notch performances from Tennant, Pack, Gleeson and Pattinson (I know, right?). But stealing the show has to be the Dark Lord himself, as Fiennes - with a little help from the CGI team - delivers a turn as Voldemort that marks a definitive transformation to the series. It's gonna be a rough ride from here on out.

Compressing a 600-page book into a film less than three hours long is never going to be easy, so the most faithful readers may not be totally satisfied with the absence of some material. For the rest, Goblet of Fire is simply awesome.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
JohnMasterLMay 4, 2015
The Goblet of Fire es la pelicula mas madura de Harry Potter de toda la saga. Esta cuarta parte es un cambio totalmente inesperado, pues sus antecesoras iban dirigidas a un publico infantil, en cambio, the goblet of fire va dirigidaThe Goblet of Fire es la pelicula mas madura de Harry Potter de toda la saga. Esta cuarta parte es un cambio totalmente inesperado, pues sus antecesoras iban dirigidas a un publico infantil, en cambio, the goblet of fire va dirigida específicamente a los adolescentes y adultos. Es entretenimiento puro, repleta de secuencias de acción increíbles.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
MrMovieBuffSep 16, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. "The Goblet of Fire" is another strong "Harry Potter" movie after 'Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban' (2004), a movie that is the first to not be given the family-friendly 'PG' rating because this one is darker and more violent, if not, more consequential than the previous three installments.

Harry (Daniel Radcliffe), Ron (Rupert Grint) and Hermione (Emma Watson) are back and they attend the Quidditch World Cup, after the big event, there is danger lurking ahead as it seems that a murderer is on the hunt for Harry. As they head back to Hogwarts, there is another huge event that takes place called the "Tri-Wizard Cup", where they are informed by a newcomer called Alistair "Mad Eye" Moody (Brendan Gleeson) that no student under the age of 17 should participate as the contest and all the games involved are extremely dangerous and not for the faint of heart.

All the other schools also part-take, but it seems that there is a strange mix-up as when all the students over the age of 17 place their names in the Goblet of Fire to allow them to take part in the challenges, Harry, who is supposed to be 14, has his name on there, somehow. A confused Dumbledore (Michael Gambon) then proceeds to let Harry part-take in this tournament, which is risky, but they have no choice, nor do they have any knowledge of who placed Harry's name in that Goblet.

A reluctant Harry then decides to take these tournaments, but one day, during a deadly challenge, he comes across his parents' murderer, Lord Voldermort (a very scary Ralph Fiennes) who tries to kill Harry in the process, but luckily Harry manages to escape, unfortunately, a fellow student, Cedric Diggory (Robert Pattinson) didn't make it out alive, making this the most intense of the series, the fact that a student died under the Hogwarts premises, does raise the stakes for all the students, especially Harry, at Hogwarts.

This is a darker, more red-blooded, and violent chapter in the "Harry Potter" franchise, equally as enjoyable as its predecessor. The young cast start to grow even more in this world and in the Hogwarts world, the action and the "Tri-Wizard" tournaments have this style that keeps you watching. They have this sense of perfectly timed choreography and sure-handed direction (by Mike Newell).

The best is yet to come, this is where the series has peaked.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
Mitya64Apr 22, 2020
Это невероятно интересный фильм. самые интересные новые персонажи во всей серии,
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
SonicHD7May 31, 2017
The fourth movie in the Harry Potter franchise sees Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) returning for his fourth year at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry, along with his friends, Ron (Rupert Grint) and Hermione (Emma Watson). There is anThe fourth movie in the Harry Potter franchise sees Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) returning for his fourth year at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry, along with his friends, Ron (Rupert Grint) and Hermione (Emma Watson). There is an upcoming tournament between the three major schools of magic, with one participant selected from each school by the Goblet of Fire. When Harry's name is drawn, even though he is not eligible and is a fourth player, he must compete in the dangerous contest.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
JPKJun 14, 2019
Massively Entertaining
Like Revenge Of The Sith, Goblet Of Fire is the 2nd movie of a franchise that went PG-13 in 2005 and definitely uses it's upgrade to it's advantage with more mature and complex themes being explored along with greatMassively Entertaining
Like Revenge Of The Sith, Goblet Of Fire is the 2nd movie of a franchise that went PG-13 in 2005 and definitely uses it's upgrade to it's advantage with more mature and complex themes being explored along with great storytelling.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
tajshar2kJul 29, 2017
The movie features intense action sequences, and I really liked the dark tone of the movie, which as it really sets up what is come in the Harry Potter franchise. This was a definitely a unique film when compared to the other Harry PotterThe movie features intense action sequences, and I really liked the dark tone of the movie, which as it really sets up what is come in the Harry Potter franchise. This was a definitely a unique film when compared to the other Harry Potter movies, as it was very fast paced, and it was the best Harry Potter movie in my opinion.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
manningn15Dec 28, 2018
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This is my 2nd favorite Harry Potter movie and one of my favorite movies of all time. I love how well-developed the characters have become and how mature the characters are now. The writing, story, plot, and screenplay were fantastic. The acting performances from the cast were stupendous especially Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, Rupert Grint, Brendan Gleeson, Michael Gambon, Maggie Smith, Miranda Richardson, Robert Pattinson, and Ralph Fiennes. The visual effects were spectacularly done especially the dragons, during the underwater scenes, during the maze scenes, and the fight between Harry and Voldemort. The scenery and sets were fantastic in this movie. The costumes were amazing in this movie especially during the Yule Ball. Also the music and film score in this movie was great. An A+ movie.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
10
the_bomberNov 23, 2019
Awesome, One of the most beautiful film I have ever seen. I suggest everyone to watch the complete saga.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
RonantheAccuserMar 30, 2019
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Lord Voldemort is one charismatic maggot. The fourth HP movie captures the spirit of the first half of the original eight movies, while taking more risks that pave the way for its ambitious future. Hagrid and Maxime are so freaking cute together and I loved seeing the dragon less cool only than Smaug and Saphira take flight but not as much as Barty displaying the Unforgivable Curses or Harry and Voldemort locking magic beams like they're playing tug-of-war or mimicking Obi-Wan and Count Dooku's lightsaber lock in "Attack of the Clones". Mike Newell clearly understood the characters even if he didn't get the plot and it really shows for better and worse and let's face it the novel is like 700 pages long. It's a pity they couldn't do this with "Half-Blood Prince". Plus this is the movie that made me think the series was finally starting to make sense and you can enjoy it without being a total nerd.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
ThejodjeremieNov 5, 2020
The movie is awesome and is my favorite film in the franchise so far. The movie is fast paced, the visuals look amazing, and the story is great. The whole ending sequence was great and has me excited to watch more.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
cayetanavelascoNov 4, 2020
I honestly think this is my favorite Harry Potter film. But I am in kind of a conflict. I think that the storyline, the action, is the best. It's the best book, but the movie is not well adapted. If you have read the book first, you will knowI honestly think this is my favorite Harry Potter film. But I am in kind of a conflict. I think that the storyline, the action, is the best. It's the best book, but the movie is not well adapted. If you have read the book first, you will know that a lot of details in the book are missing. But it's still my favorite book and I absolutely love it!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
JAKEJACOBJORDSep 17, 2021
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Bigwillyhaver69Jul 21, 2023
My personal favorite in the series and in my opinion the best in the series
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
10
Kevin_Manning_Aug 26, 2023
Hold onto your wands because "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire" is a spellbinding triumph that takes the beloved series to captivating new depths. As our young wizards enter adolescence, the film navigates the tumultuous waters ofHold onto your wands because "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire" is a spellbinding triumph that takes the beloved series to captivating new depths. As our young wizards enter adolescence, the film navigates the tumultuous waters of coming-of-age with an authenticity that resonates deeply, while also heralding the maturation and darker tones that mark a significant turning point in the saga.

The cast's evolution is nothing short of remarkable, as they seamlessly transition from child actors to teen stars, infusing their characters with newfound complexities and relatable struggles. Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint excel in portraying Harry, Hermione, and Ron as they grapple with the challenges of growing up in a world of magic. Their performances mirror the universal journey of adolescence, making their struggles and triumphs all the more relatable and moving.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
ChryssaRichNov 20, 2005
It's a great way to escape for a couple of hours. Visually stimulating and fantastic with a few real-life aspects to keep it real.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
BeakieS.Dec 23, 2005
Newel left out some scenes and Fred and George didnt tease Ron nearly as much as they did in the book.But over all it was Fairly good.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
BonbonA.Dec 4, 2005
I never really like the others 3 movies before, cause they are just horrible (the third wasn't bad, but it wasn't good enough). Goblet of Fire is completely different. Amazing, interesting, surprising, charming, and very I never really like the others 3 movies before, cause they are just horrible (the third wasn't bad, but it wasn't good enough). Goblet of Fire is completely different. Amazing, interesting, surprising, charming, and very facinating. Well, I must say that the book is better than the movie. But to tell the truth, this movie is good enough to be called an excellent movie ^__^… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
samirat.Jan 3, 2006
As the Harry potter movies go on, you can see the acters are more comfortable with their characters. In this movie you see how harry, although very powerful, has yet to fill his destiny. the special effects are great and the storyline is As the Harry potter movies go on, you can see the acters are more comfortable with their characters. In this movie you see how harry, although very powerful, has yet to fill his destiny. the special effects are great and the storyline is full of adventure and drama. In the movie harry is mysteriously entered into the triwizard tournament and by that is forced into the match and has many challenges to overcome. Near the end he gets an unexpected encounter with voldemort(who was way too cheerful for me. He was a cross between mr. edwards (little house on the praire) and the penguin. In my opinion this is the best of the harry potter movies.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
DonnaHJan 8, 2007
Although I loved PoA, and would be thrilled to see Cuaron come back and direct another HP movie, GoF is the one I enjoy the most. There are just so many things to love: Daniel Radcliffe's growth as an actor, Maggie Smith's Although I loved PoA, and would be thrilled to see Cuaron come back and direct another HP movie, GoF is the one I enjoy the most. There are just so many things to love: Daniel Radcliffe's growth as an actor, Maggie Smith's pitch-perfect delivery in every scene she's in, Brendan Gleeson's delightfully eccentric Moody, David Tennant's wonderfully insane Barty Crouch, Jr., Alan Rickman proving that he's one of the only actors capable of acting out elipses, the most realistic dragon I have ever seen on film, Dumbledore showing his very human vulnerability, everything about the Yule Ball, Ralph Fiennes' perfect blend of ruthlessness and madness as Voldemort. And, of course, there is Jarvis Cocker. Granted, there's only about 3 seconds of Jarvis...but that's what DVD extras are for, right?… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
AdnanA.Jul 19, 2008
When I watched this movie for the first time I was like... what the hell. They've ruined it! But when I watched it again and again the more I started to love it. Even though this movie also like the third one differs from the book but I When I watched this movie for the first time I was like... what the hell. They've ruined it! But when I watched it again and again the more I started to love it. Even though this movie also like the third one differs from the book but I liked whatever they did. The only thing I didn't like was the third task which is totally different from the books. Has no creatures or any excitement, but then the graveyard scene after that totally makes it up for the third task and all the credit goes to Ralph Fieness as our dear Voldemort. Story... What can I say!!?? It's Harry Potter, of course it's gonna rock. Acting... The trio remains marvelous, no doubt about that, but the rising stars are Ralph as Voldemort, Brendon as Moody and Miranda as Rita. They take the movie to a whole new level. Other adult actors are already perfect so i'm not praising them here. Michael Gambon sucked again!! In face he sucked more than he did in the previous one. That scene in which he runs towards Harry asking if he had put his name in the goblet is evidence enough for his suckage. Richard Harris we miss you!!! May he rest in peace. Direction... I found Mike Newell better than Alfonso Cuaron. Handling such a big novel is not easy but he has done an excellent job. But of course the main credit will go the Steve Kloves who is the screen writer. Even though i'd still say Warner bros should have never changed Chris in the first place. Since Chris is gone Harry Potter has lost smoothness. See lord of the rings, all the three movies feel ONE! This is not the case with HP. Visuals... The dragon was superb. The second task was superb. Voldemort's makeup was superb. In short the visuals were superb!!!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JeffM.Nov 18, 2005
GoF was my favorite of the books, and here we have my favorite of the movies so far. The structure and pace is deeply flawed, at times jarringly so, but this doesn't take away from the most solid performances, finest FX work, and GoF was my favorite of the books, and here we have my favorite of the movies so far. The structure and pace is deeply flawed, at times jarringly so, but this doesn't take away from the most solid performances, finest FX work, and greatest story in the series. There's a lot missing, but there's plenty to enjoy.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JulieM.Nov 21, 2005
While some parts of the book were left out, what was in the movie was fantastic. Great action, great effects - can't wait until the next.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
BryanN.Nov 25, 2005
Basically, for the Harry Potter series, the success of a film is greatly based on the ability of the director making a synopsys of it. I am personaly pleased with the fourth instalment. Director Chris Collumbus managed to stuff all the Basically, for the Harry Potter series, the success of a film is greatly based on the ability of the director making a synopsys of it. I am personaly pleased with the fourth instalment. Director Chris Collumbus managed to stuff all the action in it while trying to make sense for all of it. However, he left out some unnessesary plots which caused unsatisfaction to certain people. As mentioned earlier, i loved HPGOF. It was fascinating and the computer graphichs were simply brilliant. I was simply awed by how the tiles flew from the castle roof when the dragon kind of clinged on it. There are also a lot of breath-taking action and wonderfull scenery. An adventure leads to another, it's as simple as that. I really enjoyed the movie very much, maybe it's due to months of anticipated wait. The celebrities however, play an important role in the popularity of the movie. There are, naturally, humurous parts of the film as a tradition, some from Rowling, but some implemented from Chris himself. It was really funny. My only complaint is, the lenght of the movie was too short. For a book that's that thick, it seems rather impossible for the director to minimized it to it's current state but he managed. Unfortunately, this resulted in difficulty in understanding the Movie. i doubt anyone would truly realize what is happening if he or she has yet to read the book. In my opinoin, the show should at least be 3 hours long, but 5 as a better option. He could have divided the movie into two episodes. By then people would not complain : Why no SPEW? Why no Winky, And Why No Sphinx? As a conclution, Chris has managed to pack J.K.Rowlings Fascinating world into an action packed film. This is the defining film for the whole series, a must watch for fans. It is definitely worth your bucks.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
PatrickD.Nov 26, 2005
I thought Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban was the best of the series. I was probably wrong. Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire was a VERY good movie and VERY well done. The movie centers on Harry as he takes his fourth year into I thought Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban was the best of the series. I was probably wrong. Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire was a VERY good movie and VERY well done. The movie centers on Harry as he takes his fourth year into Hogwarts. This year, Voldemort's (sorry, "He Who Must Not Be Named") power is steadily growing, thanks to his servants, the Death Eaters. Early in the film, Harry and his pals are gathering at the Quittich World Cup. Quickly into the film, the characters are attacked-not by dementors this time- but by Death Eaters, Lord Voledemort's servants. (This part was very exciting.) The film moves fairly quickly, with more mystery than even the Prisoner of Azkaban had. Harry Potter is entered into the Tri-Wizard Tournament. How? We have yet to find out. Unfortunately for Harry, he has no choice except to accept what is in front of him. What also sucks for Harry is that people have died in the Tri-Wizard Tournament. Yes, it's that dangerous. One thing new with Harry is that he is at the stage in life where he is changing. Hormones. More romance takes place, than it did in the others. For example, Harry seems to have a bit of feeling for Cho Chung. Ron gets jealous of his friends, because he can't get a date for himself. Hermione seems to have taken a liking to one of the other competitors. I remember Ron commenting "Bloody hell" when checking out the bodies of the French team. The movie generally is exciting and face-paced, but even if it has a length of 157 minutes, it still moves too fast for its own good. For example, they never tell us what a port-key is. (The audience has to figure it out for themselves.) The character, Cedric Diggory is hardly introduced to us. There seems to be no beginning the scene where the Death Eaters attack. It just happens out of nowhere. The movie never tells us why Ron gets mad at Harry. (It is because he is jealous, as previously stated.) Even if they took out parts of the book to make the movie shorter, they seem to have taken out necessary parts along with them. I did like the movie, but… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
MarkNov 30, 2005
It would be hard to top the Prisoner of Azkaban and this movie does not - its good, but not better. I miss the lyrical character driven nature of Prisoner.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
GilbertM.Jan 26, 2006
Yeah, some of it's a bit different. Which is a shame. But I really don't envy Steve Kloves his job in adapting these, and I'm not surprised he's given the next one to someone else while he buggers off to direct something. Yeah, some of it's a bit different. Which is a shame. But I really don't envy Steve Kloves his job in adapting these, and I'm not surprised he's given the next one to someone else while he buggers off to direct something. Take a look at the book one day. It's huge. It's a housebrick. And the next one's even bigger. I seriously had no idea how they'd shrink this fourth one into one film. More than three hours is for no - exactly three hours is pushing it. Fortunately, they managed it, and if some of the characterisation and plotting is simpler, it's because it's a different medium. You still should read the books before you see the films, because the books are the real story and the films are just moving picture versions of them, but they're damn good moving picture versions. Oh my god, there's a Big Momma's House 2? Okay, this review is over, I've got some calls to make.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
KarenE.Feb 19, 2006
The last installment of the HP series was one of the best movies I've seen this year. Full of action and mystery, Harry Potter finally meets the badie in the series. there were only a few bad points. Otherwise it was wonderful!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
Louis'sBroMar 21, 2007
Best Harry Potter movie I've seen (thus far). After reading the book, I couldn't wait to see how the movie would turn out. The action was amazing and the acting was incredible. However, I wouldn't give this movie a ten because Best Harry Potter movie I've seen (thus far). After reading the book, I couldn't wait to see how the movie would turn out. The action was amazing and the acting was incredible. However, I wouldn't give this movie a ten because the creators cut out too many parts from the book.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
DavidK.Nov 18, 2005
Excellent story and acting. It is very impressive that after four installments the sequals have not started to weaken. This is a major credit to the "quality" that is so consistent in the movies. Two thumbs up and a job very well done!!!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JenF.Nov 18, 2005
Clearly, the series is maturing along with it's cast and audience. This is the best of the bunch so far - with stunning, seamless visual effects.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
ClintM.Nov 21, 2005
When so many big budget movies being made are crap (ie: Fantastic Four ... which for some reason audiences seemed to love?!) it's always nice to be entertained and treated to something that's worth watching! I'm not sure if I When so many big budget movies being made are crap (ie: Fantastic Four ... which for some reason audiences seemed to love?!) it's always nice to be entertained and treated to something that's worth watching! I'm not sure if I put this one ahead of "Azkaban" but it's definitely standing there next to it. It was wonderfully acted, deliciously creepy and visually arresting. I'll be seeing it again very shortly!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
CameramsMayNov 20, 2005
Best Harry Potter movie, yet. Though the movie was long for this genre, it wasn't possible to capture all of the nuances of the book (I would have preferred a longer film with more of the book's storyline). However, it captured the Best Harry Potter movie, yet. Though the movie was long for this genre, it wasn't possible to capture all of the nuances of the book (I would have preferred a longer film with more of the book's storyline). However, it captured the mood of the book stunningly. The special effects were good, but not overwhelming. A few of the scenes given minor play in the book were overly long in the movie (e.g. Moaning Myrtle and the bath). Although dark and more adult than the other films, this film kept its sense of humour throughout. I suspect that those who have read the book, as I have, will find the movie much less confusing than those who have not; for example, it is not possible to fully understand the climax of the movie without having read the book, though one doesn't need to comprehend it in its entirety to enjoy the film (without giving too much away for those who haven't seen the film, think "ghosts" of Harry's mum and dad). I saw the film with my husband, my three children and two of my chidren's friends. Husband thought the film was OK (not having read the book) and the children and I quite loved it. The children were disappointed that so much of the book was left out, and felt that the movie was "way too short"! Considering the length of this film, I consider that, in and of itself, to be a positive review on their parts. They were riveted. I agree with some other reviewers about two things, however - neither Dumbledore nor Voldemort were quite accurately represented. However, that did not decrease our enjoyment of the film.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
AshleyW.Nov 20, 2005
Though many critics wish to complain about how things were "left out", I personally being a major fan of the books found this film to be near perfection. I mean LotR could be said to do the same but with so much material to cover how is a Though many critics wish to complain about how things were "left out", I personally being a major fan of the books found this film to be near perfection. I mean LotR could be said to do the same but with so much material to cover how is a verbatim film version to take place without being 10 hours long ! Bottom-line, Goblet of Fire was a thrilling well-paced movie that is sure to ensnare old and new fans alike.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
LewisM.Nov 23, 2005
Great movie, ashamed they had to leave out so much though - should have either been longer or split into two movies.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
BobbiG.Nov 24, 2005
This, I must say, is the best of all previous editions to the Harry Potter series. In this movie, I found the introduction to be very choppy and disoriented. Being a rather large fan of Rowling's books, I noted several things that This, I must say, is the best of all previous editions to the Harry Potter series. In this movie, I found the introduction to be very choppy and disoriented. Being a rather large fan of Rowling's books, I noted several things that should have been added in to make sceen to sceen changes move smoother through out the movie. Yes, I am quite aware of what it takes to create a film and many beloved things in the books have to be taken out, but some of the things they did keep seemed unessessary and could have been replaced with another sceen somewhere else in the script. I do, however, think there is an admirable balance between graphics and acting. The wonderful fantastical events, like dragons and Port Key travel, were awesome in graphics. At this point, it is less believable that charactors such as Draco Malfoy (Tom Felton 18) and Ron Weasley(Rupert Grint 17) were really 14. By the time the charactors have reached seventh year, the actors will be in their early twenties. I know that changing actors is very risky business, but I am sure that Draco legally able to by Alcohol in the USA is quite a ridiculous thing. I do admire the actors increasing skill and maturity throughout the film series. Thank you for your time.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JerryNov 27, 2005
It's a winner- don't believe any of the naysayers. I have seen (and read) them all & this is the best, so far. The only regative is the inability to tell the entire story- but almost 3 hours is a comprise. Read "Directors Cut. "
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
halbNov 28, 2005
The best Potter yet. I like the fact that I didn't read the book this time. Most nay-sayers are folks who seem cheated that the movie didn't cover every single subplot. Need to back up and look at the larger picture here: this is a The best Potter yet. I like the fact that I didn't read the book this time. Most nay-sayers are folks who seem cheated that the movie didn't cover every single subplot. Need to back up and look at the larger picture here: this is a great film -- dark, magical, humorous; even thrilling in places -- achieves a great balance between the smaller stories and subplots about personal relationships and budding sexuality, and the larger moral scope of Rowling's work. Highly recommended, but not for kids under 8 or 9.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JasonB.Nov 30, 2005
This is the best of the bunch! The Harry Potter films are growing up with the characters and becoming even more enjoyable to experience. This film is a great summary of the book while keeping to a reasonable time frame. For those who do not This is the best of the bunch! The Harry Potter films are growing up with the characters and becoming even more enjoyable to experience. This film is a great summary of the book while keeping to a reasonable time frame. For those who do not read the books, this is a fun and entertaining movie. For the die hard book fans, no movie is good enough. For me, a fan (a realistic fan) I know that they could not have made a better movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
danielleDec 29, 2005
The best harry potter yet! the actors are playing their part to the par and theyre becoming great actors!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
CaseyG.Dec 30, 2005
Sticks to the book and very good acting. This is the best one so far. Very good directing and costumes.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
MichelleG.Dec 8, 2005
The Best Harry Potter film yet Dainel Radcliff is Waaaaay cuter WITH glasses The best part had to be the Ball If only Hary took Ginny.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
RachelH.Dec 9, 2005
The best Harry Potter movie yet! The more you see it, the more you like it. Though it's not as faithful to the book, I thought a couple changes were for the better. The characters are growing up, and the movies are getting darker and The best Harry Potter movie yet! The more you see it, the more you like it. Though it's not as faithful to the book, I thought a couple changes were for the better. The characters are growing up, and the movies are getting darker and more interesting. The best movie this year!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
FraserW.Mar 12, 2006
Everything about this movie was perfect I think the next one wont do anything but rise and i might give it a 10.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
Guy!May 15, 2007
I loved this movie, best one yet. It was suprisingly close to the book for it's length, although it cut out some vital parts, but the book is over 400 pgs, so we can't expect them to put in everything. Something I really despise I loved this movie, best one yet. It was suprisingly close to the book for it's length, although it cut out some vital parts, but the book is over 400 pgs, so we can't expect them to put in everything. Something I really despise though is that people accuse the whole series of promoting Satanism. WAKE UP PEOPLE!!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
[Anonymous]Nov 18, 2005
The only problem with this movie was that it seemed rushed.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
WAKOJAKONov 21, 2005
Not Rowlings best book and not the best movie of the franchise, but definitely a worthy successor Cuaron's visually arresting and poignant Prisoner of Azkaban. The only movie I've seen this year that I couldn't wait to see Not Rowlings best book and not the best movie of the franchise, but definitely a worthy successor Cuaron's visually arresting and poignant Prisoner of Azkaban. The only movie I've seen this year that I couldn't wait to see again. I only wish there would have been more.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
MattA.Nov 21, 2005
In my opinion, this film is not only the best Potter film yet, but it stands up against any other memorable fantasy movie ever, including the LOTR trilogy. Great acting, perfect pacing and direction, superb script-this has it all.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JoshH.Nov 22, 2005
Superb film watch it, its gr8 well acted in most parts and scared quite a few people in the cinema at the end. Thrilling. definitely lives up to the hype.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
DondoV.Nov 24, 2005
A very intense and well made adventure.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JeethJ.Dec 17, 2005
The movie was a bit more harsh and realistic this time around...Mike Newell has done an excellent job reducing that book into just 157 minutes....but many important parts of the book were missing.....all in all the best movie of the harry The movie was a bit more harsh and realistic this time around...Mike Newell has done an excellent job reducing that book into just 157 minutes....but many important parts of the book were missing.....all in all the best movie of the harry potter franchise.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
BobR.Dec 18, 2005
I think this movie was great! The only thing i don't like is how much got cut off from the book. No S.P.E.W, no Dobby, no Winky, no houselves at all, it never shows Sirius except the part when he's in the fire place, the list keeps I think this movie was great! The only thing i don't like is how much got cut off from the book. No S.P.E.W, no Dobby, no Winky, no houselves at all, it never shows Sirius except the part when he's in the fire place, the list keeps gping. But still it is an amazing movie and you should watch it!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
alyaa.Dec 22, 2005
Wow..this movie is so cool.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
JohnM.Dec 31, 2005
Faithful to the book, for the most part. In the name of literacy, PLEASE pick up the book and read it!
0 of 0 users found this helpful
9
GavGav96Dec 10, 2010
Not only does this film emphasise how HP has matured, it also shows more invention, action, and romantic, the result of which being probably the second-best film in the series thusfar.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
gm101Mar 21, 2011
A near perfect adaptation of the book, and one of my top three Harry Potter movies so far. This movie really set a high point for the franchise back in 2005. And this will probably be the only time Robert Patterson is in a movie that wasn't terrible.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
9
Film_Fanatic_15Nov 22, 2010
Mike Newell directs the 4th film from the Harry Potter novels. This is a major improvement from the 3rd movie, while still giving a variety of great intense sequences of action, and a well developed story. It is the most entertaining so far,Mike Newell directs the 4th film from the Harry Potter novels. This is a major improvement from the 3rd movie, while still giving a variety of great intense sequences of action, and a well developed story. It is the most entertaining so far, and proves to be brilliant. I was liking the franchise once again, after the unfortunate downfall of the Prisoner of Azkaban, in my opinion. Harry matures and developes more intimate relationships with others, and develops a better understanding of the severity of Lord Voldemort. And so as the characters mature, so does the film, into one of the best directed and produced of the franchise.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
TheGorillaJul 17, 2011
This has to be the best Potter film in the series, aside 'Half Blood Prince'. It's not as dreadful as the first two movies, which kinda sucked, and it's not like the 'Prisoner of Azkaban' which is over forced. But you have to give props toThis has to be the best Potter film in the series, aside 'Half Blood Prince'. It's not as dreadful as the first two movies, which kinda sucked, and it's not like the 'Prisoner of Azkaban' which is over forced. But you have to give props to the third one, cause it definitely gave the franchise a new spooky, interesting dimension which made the franchise more enjoyable by adding some depth to it. In 'Goblet of Fire' there are some scenes that could have been done better, but overall the movie is quite fun, enjoyable and action peaked. Besides, I'm looking forward to 'Deathly Hollows Part II'. I think it will be the best one to date.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
9
TokyochuchuJul 28, 2013
Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire was the tipping point of the franchise for me. The first two movies were decent but nothing to get overly hyped about. The third one kicked off the darker tone but was seriously overlong. Goblet of Fire isHarry Potter and the Goblet of Fire was the tipping point of the franchise for me. The first two movies were decent but nothing to get overly hyped about. The third one kicked off the darker tone but was seriously overlong. Goblet of Fire is long too but it doesn't feel anywhere near as long as the Prisoner of azkaban. It's a much more exciting and scarier ride than the previous Potter movies. This was the first film in the series to make me think "Wow! We might have something special here after all!" Now that the franchise is finished, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire still ranks among the best potter movies.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
AlnORTIZJul 11, 2011
Goblet of Fire has something that no other Harry Potter film before it had: a deep, dark and moving tone with heart. As well as the book, the plot is very dark and simple with the performances really showing how the plot was executed. TheGoblet of Fire has something that no other Harry Potter film before it had: a deep, dark and moving tone with heart. As well as the book, the plot is very dark and simple with the performances really showing how the plot was executed. The visuals are on par with Prisoner of Azkaban and really show how magical the spells really are. This is one of the better additions the series and one that show loads of magic.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
DramaStormFeb 16, 2011
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Man, oh man! Now this is where things really start to get interesting! Hello, everyone! I am DramaStorm. And this is my review for the fourth Harry Potter Movie: Goblet of Fire. Well, if anyone says this movie is overrated, then they have not watched it enough times yet! With a deep and dark plot and maybe even a few sub-plots, you can't go wrong if you want to watch a random film one dark and stormy night. The best part of this movie: When Harry Potter becomes one of two Champions of Hogwarts. Imagine his shock when his name flew out of the Goblet of Fire! The worst part of this film: When Cedric Diggory was killed. It really would have been nice to have him become a long-time friend of Harry and his friends. Really, I mean it. Ta-Ta!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
AVCITYJul 13, 2011
Taking a step away from the more moody and intimate Prisoner Of Azkaban, Mike Newell instead gives us an immersive and thrilling adventure. There are more characters to deal with and the scope is much bigger than any of the previous films.Taking a step away from the more moody and intimate Prisoner Of Azkaban, Mike Newell instead gives us an immersive and thrilling adventure. There are more characters to deal with and the scope is much bigger than any of the previous films. This film is a joy to watch with lots of thrills and humor to be had. The return of Voldemort is done well and scary enough as to not frighten little children. All the actors once again are top notch in their roles, and the newcomers provide some great moments as well. A lot of fun.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
heyitsmegrif4Dec 17, 2011
Thrilling with some great performances, and dazzling visuals and Potters most complex story yet, and definitely the most entertaining of all of the Potters. I give this movie 92% of a good film.
9 of 13 users found this helpful94
All this user's reviews
9
Trev29Jun 11, 2013
This is the one Harry Potter movie that is clearly distinctive from the rest, and that is why it is one of the best of the series. Sensationally atmospheric and skillfully paced.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
potatoes351Aug 14, 2012
All books and films previous to Goblet of Fire are just setting up the events that take place in this story, that will shape the course of the coming saga. The films now look to be more dark and gritty with a focus on survival and a bitterAll books and films previous to Goblet of Fire are just setting up the events that take place in this story, that will shape the course of the coming saga. The films now look to be more dark and gritty with a focus on survival and a bitter war between good and evil. The special effects may be back in a large quantity but unlike CoS they are used correctly making epic scenes even more epic. Best HP film yet.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
FilmEqualsJoyNov 10, 2012
One of the darkest entries in the series. The magical feeling is still there, but a new feeling starts to make itself apparent. That would be the feeling of fear. A thrilling film!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
jfrotylpe532Dec 21, 2012
Goblet of Fire is in my opinion the best written out of all the Harry Potters besides maybe the last one. The adrenaline and excitement race in this one. Not to mention the best ending to any of the first 4 Harry Potters. All in All if yourGoblet of Fire is in my opinion the best written out of all the Harry Potters besides maybe the last one. The adrenaline and excitement race in this one. Not to mention the best ending to any of the first 4 Harry Potters. All in All if your looking for excitement this film gives it to you.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
9
Rox22Apr 26, 2015
A welcome return to form. The fourth film more or less tries to recapture the whimsical tone of the first two movies, yet also maintaining the foreboding subtext of the third.

The effects really do go overboard this time around. AbsolutelyA welcome return to form. The fourth film more or less tries to recapture the whimsical tone of the first two movies, yet also maintaining the foreboding subtext of the third.

The effects really do go overboard this time around. Absolutely gorgeous. Acting on par with the last few movies. While the plot this time round feels a bit too light hearted when compared to the last movie, it is a refreshing reprieve from what is to come.

Overall:
HPatGoF is one of my favourite Harry Potter movies and I enjoyed it immensely.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
TrilobiteGAug 9, 2015
The real crème de la crème to the franchise. This is what I was waiting for, finally! Proper intense fantasy action with a sincerely dark and twisted ending to show that harry potter is not for children any more. Fantastic Movie.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
SEROJMar 28, 2013
Superb action! Amazing story! "Goblet of Fire" is for sure a great experience! If you watched the previous parts, you're gonna love this one too! My final score is 9/10, near perfect!
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
cryhardhumorJul 26, 2015
While the earlier movies in the series were passable, this fourth installment finally takes the franchise to new heights of energy and humor. The full potential is now realized and put beautifully onto the screen
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
BrunoADJun 14, 2013
Goblet of Fire is not the favorite Harry Potter movie but my impression on me, especially the script.

One thing we can never deny the script Goblet of Fire is better, because we know that adapting a book of over 400 pages is not easy. TheGoblet of Fire is not the favorite Harry Potter movie but my impression on me, especially the script.

One thing we can never deny the script Goblet of Fire is better, because we know that adapting a book of over 400 pages is not easy. The trail did not please me much (missed impacted) the effects are wonderful as the dragon is imagined Ralph (Voldemort) was the right choice for the villain, not denying that Voldemort makeup is beautiful .'s from that movie that things change, now no longer a child, evil takes over and the film begin to get darker and Mike managed to arrive at the right point of change… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
SythusRATINGSOct 18, 2014
Harry and friends are back in this fourth installment of the series when the stakes are risen as the Triwizard Tournament comes to Hogwarts and Harry is forced to compete in it.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Rutger-KikkertJun 5, 2016
Sure the movie's storyline fails to deliver believability at some points, but hell is this movie spectacular and entertaining and also a very well made and well acted piece of cinema.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
EpicLadySpongeJan 20, 2016
Likely, there's films like Harry Potter that still manage to get things right throughout the franchise. As the Goblet of Fire comes to the best conclusion to think about which one's my favorite out of them all. It's obviously the lastLikely, there's films like Harry Potter that still manage to get things right throughout the franchise. As the Goblet of Fire comes to the best conclusion to think about which one's my favorite out of them all. It's obviously the last installment of this franchise.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
alejandro970Apr 9, 2017
The dramatic arch of saga becomes more darker and perilous. It´s fast paced but the edition feels some hurried with some holes, but preserves the taste of previous episodes. Potter fans only.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
HPFANBOY1237Apr 9, 2017
The Goblet of Fire is extremely entertaining and once again very fun to watch. Much like the Prisoner of Azkaban, the Goblet of Fire is darker and more emotional, but this movie does the book the least justice and leaves so much out. At timesThe Goblet of Fire is extremely entertaining and once again very fun to watch. Much like the Prisoner of Azkaban, the Goblet of Fire is darker and more emotional, but this movie does the book the least justice and leaves so much out. At times it even feels like a bunch of random scenes put together, still, the Goblet of Fire is another strong entry in the Harry Potter series!… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
eusoufaelOct 18, 2021
The best movie in the series. While David Yates's movies feel cold and unemotional, this works nearly as a thriller. Although later films will deal with much more important deaths, this one delivers the most emotional one on screen. The musicThe best movie in the series. While David Yates's movies feel cold and unemotional, this works nearly as a thriller. Although later films will deal with much more important deaths, this one delivers the most emotional one on screen. The music is melodramatic, the acting got better, the action scenes are enormous, but never too long, the villains are gruesome, this movie is what the whole series should have been.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
ty92Feb 22, 2020
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. This might be the best Harry Potter movie. Really great ending and interesting plot. Voldemort returns and Harry is saved by his parents force ghost. And Robert Pattinson's character is killed. Voldemort is probably the best villain that I've seen to date in any movie. I liked the challenges that Harry had to do here. These movies are so well written. Everything is set up and paid off.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
merijnjFeb 21, 2018
(89/100)
A very good movie that sets the tone for how dangerous voldemort really is.
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
9
movieloverandiJul 14, 2021
I am a big Harry Potter fan and for me Goblet of fire is the most underrated in the franchise. Its such an entertaining and suspenseful film and it has some of the greatest sequences in the franchise. The acting and special effects are greatI am a big Harry Potter fan and for me Goblet of fire is the most underrated in the franchise. Its such an entertaining and suspenseful film and it has some of the greatest sequences in the franchise. The acting and special effects are great and the third act is simply epic.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
os2251carApr 11, 2020
una película increíblemente buena es mi favorita personalmente pero objetivamente no creo que sea la mejor. la película es muy buena y es una adaptación del libro casi perfecta. todos estaban muy intrigados de como se iba a ver voldemort yauna película increíblemente buena es mi favorita personalmente pero objetivamente no creo que sea la mejor. la película es muy buena y es una adaptación del libro casi perfecta. todos estaban muy intrigados de como se iba a ver voldemort ya que en esta película hace su primera aparición y sin duda fue lo mejor de la película. la saga de harry potter es simplemente especial y yo siendo alguien muy fan de harry potter realmente me cuesta trabajo hacerle una reseña con objetividad. La película es muy intensa y desde el principio te tiene entretenido, ademas que desde esta película harry potter paso a ser mas oscuro. pues es en esta película donde sale voldemort. te das cuenta del gran cambio y el gran contraste de esto si lo comparas con las primeras 2 películas. Tiene escenas de todo, graciosas, entretenidas, de suspenso y tristes. esta película es un punto de inflexión de como van a ser las siguientes películas de harry potter, pues desde aquí la saga pasa de ser una muy bonita y pura a tomar un tono mucho mas oscuro conforme harry va creciendo. sin duda mi favorita porque fue la que cambio la saga.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Ryo91Apr 17, 2020
>>>>>>>>>> 9/10 * Nicht schlecht. Hätte man noch etwas besser machen können.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Manuel89qqDec 12, 2022
⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
Fixer84Mar 16, 2023
One of the very first movies I ever saw in the cinema, it has everything you would want from a Harry Potter movie. And it is a fundamental watershed for the continuation of the saga, as it is a perfect middle chapter that bridges the firstOne of the very first movies I ever saw in the cinema, it has everything you would want from a Harry Potter movie. And it is a fundamental watershed for the continuation of the saga, as it is a perfect middle chapter that bridges the first three films to the last four.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
JacobA-KNov 20, 2005
It was good movie but they left out some important parts and changed others. by the way did anyone else realize that the death eaters looked a lot like the kkk?
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
HughH.Jan 6, 2006
The best Harry Potter movie to date.
0 of 0 users found this helpful
8
BillNov 20, 2005
A charmingly darkened coming-of-age as seen through a fantasy world lens. Haltingly adapted from Rowling's slightly-less-than-most-popular of the series, Goblet of Fire delivers a valiant effort at ramping up all the crucial variables A charmingly darkened coming-of-age as seen through a fantasy world lens. Haltingly adapted from Rowling's slightly-less-than-most-popular of the series, Goblet of Fire delivers a valiant effort at ramping up all the crucial variables in the Potter anthology: Maturity, Romance, Humor, Adolescence, Magical Eyecandy and the impending sense of a looming conflict. Things that could've been more polished: Voldemort's nose. Where'd it go? Why? This provoked a few unsolicited laughs in the theater I saw it in. And as with the second and third films, Rickman's glorious Snape is woefully underused... While such huge chunks of the book having to be excised (understandably) that there's an almost stuttering feel to the flow of things. Well, it was either that, or have Goblet of Fire I and II... With the actors being in their 30's by the time the movies were done. Nevertheless, from Moaning Myrtle's bathtime advances on a suddenly-babe-magnet Harry to Ron's botched interactions with Hermione, we're seeing this group grow up - shifting away from children's fare. Like anyone's first teen years, these are treacherous waters for the Potter films and for such a transitional piece, Goblet does pretty well.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful
Page:
More From This Movie

81 Critic Reviews

7.8 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 77 Project Hail Mary
2 75 Send Help
3 73 Hoppers
4 72 The Sheep Detectives
5 68 Crime 101
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL