Hail, Caesar!
Universal Pictures | Release Date: February 5, 2016
6.0
USER SCORE
Mixed or average reviews based on 511 Ratings
USER RATING DISTRIBUTION
Positive:
256
Mixed:
165
Negative:
90
Watch Now
Buy on
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Stream On
Expand
Review this movie
VOTE NOW
 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Check box if your review contains spoilers 0 characters (5000 max)

User Reviews

User scoreBy dateMost helpful
1
El_FlacoJan 7, 2023
Forse non ho una sufficiente sensibilità cinematografica per apprezzare la pellicola ma per me questo film è una cagata pazzesca, decisamente il peggiore dei fratelli Coen ma anche per distacco
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
eva3si0nJun 19, 2022
Hail, Caesar! I was completely unimpressed. Perhaps I have too high a degree of expectation from the films of the Koen brothers, but not a strong cast, not a good satire over Hollywood in the 60s before the abolition of the Hayes code did notHail, Caesar! I was completely unimpressed. Perhaps I have too high a degree of expectation from the films of the Koen brothers, but not a strong cast, not a good satire over Hollywood in the 60s before the abolition of the Hayes code did not convince me. Hail, Caesar! sort of like a comedy, but it hardly makes the viewer laugh. The film is not bad in itself, but cranberries about the Russian KGB and the protracted plot disappoints… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
DawdlingPoetNov 26, 2021
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. I quite enjoyed this film - I watched it knowing its a Coen brothers film, having seen 'O Brother, Where Art Thou' and 'Burn After Reading', so I knew roughly what to expect.

This film isn't full of major laugh out loud moments but there are a good number of quite amusing scenes never the less - its perhaps a little too gentle and not as 'in your face' as some people may like their favourite comedy films to be but I certainly found it enjoyable. There is some great cinematography and there is some slapstick humour, with a number of scenes filmed featuring some impressive choreography. As a parody of 1950s Hollywood, particularly of a sort of forced overly happyness aspect of musical films at the time, it does quite well. I liked what happened to George Clooney's character (Baird Whitlock) and the sort of themes or moral messages that come from that. I also enjoyed the rousing music to match the melodrama of the film being, well, filmed during the film itself.

I thought this was an easy film to watch, an amusing and mostly quite entertaining one, although the plot pace won't suit all but I'd recommend it to fans of the Coen brothers work.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
NickTheCritickNov 2, 2021
This might be by far the worst coen brothers movie. Nothing seems to be working here.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
MahmusSep 25, 2020
While far from being one the Coen brother's best films, there's something about this movie that keeps me coming back to it.

Maybe it's the way it simultaneously critizices and makes fun of Hollywood while still being a love letter to it; orWhile far from being one the Coen brother's best films, there's something about this movie that keeps me coming back to it.

Maybe it's the way it simultaneously critizices and makes fun of Hollywood while still being a love letter to it; or maybe it's just Alden Ehrenreich, who steals the entire movie with his hilarious performance. Seriously, he's so good in this movie.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
pijgogoJul 6, 2020
Only good for certain types of viewers. What helps is the star studded cast. This pays homage to a good deal of the entire movie process – the writers, production sets, movie stars, dancing and musicals, etc. This has a place in history andOnly good for certain types of viewers. What helps is the star studded cast. This pays homage to a good deal of the entire movie process – the writers, production sets, movie stars, dancing and musicals, etc. This has a place in history and in our worlds for providing some comedic transparency and as a lookback to the evolution of movie production. I appreciate those aspects, but didn’t find it as entertaining as other (Coen) films.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
Voodoo123May 3, 2020
Hail! Caesar has fantastic production value and starry cast bolster the average screenplay of what I would best describe as the Cohen bros most self indulgent movie to date. It's fascinating to watch what the auteur duo can achieve with theirHail! Caesar has fantastic production value and starry cast bolster the average screenplay of what I would best describe as the Cohen bros most self indulgent movie to date. It's fascinating to watch what the auteur duo can achieve with their Hollowood pals in this love letter to it's golden age of studio movies but I found there was nothing particularly challenging to be found. Very watchable though.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
The3AcademySinsNov 18, 2019
I went into Hail, Caesar! expecting that the numerous reviews and word-of-mouth grumblings I have had about the movie would be true: "It's the worst Coen Brothers movie" or "its actually bad" or "its a waste of time." I was pleasantlyI went into Hail, Caesar! expecting that the numerous reviews and word-of-mouth grumblings I have had about the movie would be true: "It's the worst Coen Brothers movie" or "its actually bad" or "its a waste of time." I was pleasantly surprised when the movie turned out to be actually entertaining and meticulously crafted.

To its core, Hail, Caesar! is an anti-action movie. There is a lot of build up and tension that leads to ultimately no payoff. You're just along for the ride, and I ended up really enjoying the lack of a climax. There are a plethora of characters and interweaving plot threads, and the ensemble cast has no main character. The closest we come to a protagonist is Josh Brolin's character, who tries to navigate the quagmire that is the internal workings of a Golden Age Hollywood film studio and keep everything afloat. Every performance is really solid, and everyone gets their moment in the limelight.

Hail, Caesar is a strange, but authentic take on the movie business. Despite the occasional seediness and artistic conflicts, everyone loves the movies. In a way, Hail, Caesar is a very meta take on the film industry.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
6
TyranianAug 24, 2019
Not one of the Coens best films but still well-written and entertaining. Acting is solid.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
YungKangJun 28, 2018
The film's movie-within-a-movie sequences are undoubtedly some of the best, but too many plot threads are started and resolved all too quickly to make this a resounding film in any one's mind.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
amheretojudgeApr 29, 2018
you're a communist..

Hail, Caesar! The comic sequences are smart and practical i.e. installed within the inherent pragmatic nature written for the characters and their relation is what helps one survive this more than 100 minutes ofyou're a communist..

Hail, Caesar!

The comic sequences are smart and practical i.e. installed within the inherent pragmatic nature written for the characters and their relation is what helps one survive this more than 100 minutes of journey. Coen brothers is of course no short on execution but the script is the real culprit in here that never had enough crisp to make it in the first place. The feature endorses itself on performance level and star power that matches both the things perfectly delivered thoroughly by Josh Brolin and George Clooney and other cameos. Hail, Caesar! has everything in the right place but still seems missing something between the sketchy comic sequences that fails to bind it all and create the anticipated impact.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
2
MacsMusicDec 29, 2017
When all is said and done, I just didn't get the joke. I never laughed, even once, while watching this "comedy". Everything was just kind of weird and didn't make much sense. Nothing about it was funny; everything about it was boring and weird.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
JyroJyroAug 10, 2017
Funny, quirky and a little boring. There is a definitive lack of substance to the various sub-plots too, but taken purely as a comedy it is entertaining enough. Brilliant acting from Brolin & Clooney.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
HealingToolbox1Dec 2, 2017
One reviewer said it best for me, the breeziness of the plot is more than made up for by the wit and insight of the production design and sly micro mis-steps. In Deakins' hands you've never seen "breeze" look this good or this beguiling.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
alejandro970Nov 26, 2017
Brothers Coen reproduce with ingenuity the tinsel of the golden age of cinema in the 50s; all this and the double moral and hypocresy of the producers and society. The fat cats of the cast makes a remarkable job, even Roger Deakins behind the camera.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
badgerryan19May 19, 2017
Stupid funny comedy. Bust out laughing at some points. Great acting, intriguing story. Another great film from the Coen brothers. Not for everyone but still a good one.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
sanyrubApr 16, 2017
The Coen brothers films are not made for the masses. And why should they? I personally am not the biggest fan of all. But I appreciate talent, style and good scripts. This has tons of that, as any of their releases. I wasn´t bored at anyThe Coen brothers films are not made for the masses. And why should they? I personally am not the biggest fan of all. But I appreciate talent, style and good scripts. This has tons of that, as any of their releases. I wasn´t bored at any point and I enjoyed every single detail and actor in this. Special mentions to Tilda Swinton (she´s just so unique) and Josh Brolin. Channing Tatum is funny and the boy can dance. Alden does a great job too. One of the biggest roles in the film. Thumbs up for film makers who pursue art.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
8
kathytreeceApr 8, 2017
Love the Coen Brothers' humor. Enjoyable performances by Brolin and Clooney. Enjoyed performances by Swinton and Ehrenreich. Watched this on Netflix Instant.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
Cassio-MartinsMar 3, 2017
A good movie set in 1950's, a part of Hollywood greatest history, shows the life of a "fixer" (portrayed by the always great Josh Brolin) and his stars,in a studio amazed by big productions like the main title: Hail, Caesar!
Another good jobA good movie set in 1950's, a part of Hollywood greatest history, shows the life of a "fixer" (portrayed by the always great Josh Brolin) and his stars,in a studio amazed by big productions like the main title: Hail, Caesar!
Another good job by the Coen brothers, who developed a good comedy and a funny satire.… Expand
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
4
Benkoko11Feb 23, 2017
Caeser's problem is that it offers little appeal or even understanding from the non-hollywood crowd, giving it a by-insiders, for-insiders inaccessability.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
GreatGatsbyJan 28, 2017
Hail, Caesar! is another great film from the Coen Brothers, based on the 1940's Hollywood hijenks. The film has great star power and amazing acting throughout, with production both magical and colorful. The film's humor for the most part isHail, Caesar! is another great film from the Coen Brothers, based on the 1940's Hollywood hijenks. The film has great star power and amazing acting throughout, with production both magical and colorful. The film's humor for the most part is amusing, though some parts are dragged out a little too long, with periods of dialogue that is both dull and tiresome. The plot of the multiple areas of a "fixer" in Hollywood is both smart and well acknowledged within the film. Hail, Caesar! is a smart production with star power, and only lacking an uproarious response and satisfying ending for the numerous characters involved.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
SomePersonaJan 27, 2017
A seemingly light and harmless movie with serious dark undertones beneath its overplayed charm. The movie has a panicked tone as high stunts in choreography, production design, score, and acting are brought onto the last remaining films ofA seemingly light and harmless movie with serious dark undertones beneath its overplayed charm. The movie has a panicked tone as high stunts in choreography, production design, score, and acting are brought onto the last remaining films of the studio system before it collapses. The movie also questions religion, economy, and opposing government ideologies.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
6
PeterAlexanderDec 11, 2016
Great cast, quirky and filled with amusing dialogue, the Coen brothers provide a film that is reasonably enjoyable to watch, but nothing more. It is not the masterpiece it tries to be.
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
1
moneylincolnDec 9, 2016
Such a star studded cast, but the jokes aren't their. I watched it once in the movie theater, and fell asleep. Watched a second time on dvd, same as above. Don't waste your time with a film that should be hailed at, instead of well received.Such a star studded cast, but the jokes aren't their. I watched it once in the movie theater, and fell asleep. Watched a second time on dvd, same as above. Don't waste your time with a film that should be hailed at, instead of well received. I like the coen brothers, but i hope for once, that this was just a setback, and that they both will get back on track.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
chwFeb 18, 2016
Hail, Caesar! is pure Coen style. If one is unfamiliar with their style, they may have a hard time enjoying it. If I was unfamiliar with their style, I would probably give this movie a 5 as there is not much substance. But if one knows theirHail, Caesar! is pure Coen style. If one is unfamiliar with their style, they may have a hard time enjoying it. If I was unfamiliar with their style, I would probably give this movie a 5 as there is not much substance. But if one knows their style, they will probably have a blast watching this.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
3
hydrallusOct 19, 2016
19 years. That's how long I've been a Cohen Bros fan. I like all their movies. Even A Serious Man and their more obscure works. But this film just isn't that funny or that entertaining. It's only slightly so.
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
6
LeZeeSep 29, 2016
Once upon a time the king Julius Caesar was kidnapped!

So here's the new film from the Coen brothers. They have become rare in the recent years, I was always checking out what's next for them and now I'm slightly disappointed with this. IOnce upon a time the king Julius Caesar was kidnapped!

So here's the new film from the Coen brothers. They have become rare in the recent years, I was always checking out what's next for them and now I'm slightly disappointed with this. I enjoyed watching it, it is one of those you want to rate them better, but you can't for some unidentified reasons. According to my analysis why I was not satisfied fully is the story. I mean the narration was rich, performances were phenomenal and music, locations, all were fantastic, but the screenplay was kind of aimless. The beginning, the ending or even in the mid part it had no purpose, but something like a mockumentary about the film industry of the 1950s.

With the average screenplay, the directors have shown their magic. Very cool presentation, you would enjoy it if you're theirs films fan. But I don't think all his fans would be pleased enough. This is truly a multi-starrer film, everybody was at their best in their retro characters. If you share your experience with others who also saw it, they might ask who do you liked the most. Probably many would favour Josh Brolin, because he had more priority than others who comes under his belt. But George Clooney and Alden Ehrenreich also have given a good show followed by Scarlett Johansso and Tilda Swinton. The remaining ones as well not bad, but Jonah Hill was completely a waste.

Since it is about the film industry and its people, brace yourself for some good laughs. There is variety in it like different genre/theme and multiple layers in the narration. Like from moving to the western to the historical subject and then to the musical and many more. It did good at the box office against its budget, only because of the star power it has and the filmmaker's reputation came in handy. Though I hope the Coen brothers would come back strong with another product and it does not take another 3 years. It is not an award winning film, just a good entertainer, but praisable quality.

6/10… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
DaisymichelleSep 24, 2016
It was months ago that I saw it - Georg Clooney's greasy jaundiced face and greasy hair and over-acted expressions, the whole movie, to Channing Tatum's fat oversized Botox face resembling a pig and the pointless stupid dance class?, theyIt was months ago that I saw it - Georg Clooney's greasy jaundiced face and greasy hair and over-acted expressions, the whole movie, to Channing Tatum's fat oversized Botox face resembling a pig and the pointless stupid dance class?, they all hated each other. I starting to feel even more sick. I have not experienced this kind of disgust before - It was new to me - and I had paid $2 and wasn't doing anything, I kept watching and it kept it up! The makeup was appalling, George Clooney might have looked better with matt based pancake for the grease on his face, he was not wearing any, Channing Tatum had enough on for both of them on his oversized Botox head (he was actually nice looking once), George Clooney's greasy face and greasy hair stuck to his face, the whole movie! made me sick, and when it was over I felt ill and whenever I see the advertising for it I feel ill, and see George Clooney's greasy face and hair and stupid expression. Gross .That's it.… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
5
MantisAug 28, 2016
Another let down. I didn't get the fuss about Inside Llwyn Davis, and now this. The movie is at least for me more entertaining than the previous one of the brother directors, but still it failed to deliver for me. I could appreciate someAnother let down. I didn't get the fuss about Inside Llwyn Davis, and now this. The movie is at least for me more entertaining than the previous one of the brother directors, but still it failed to deliver for me. I could appreciate some jokes and clever remarks, but all in all it was not a very interesting story. One to watch if you're a Coen brothers fan and otherwise nothing lost by skipping this one.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
6
RalfbergsAug 17, 2016
If you're a big fan of Coen brothers then I'll bet you enjoy this one too, but for me, even though I like most of their movies, this lacked something, I don't know, I think the story was a bit too boring. At first it felt interesting that IIf you're a big fan of Coen brothers then I'll bet you enjoy this one too, but for me, even though I like most of their movies, this lacked something, I don't know, I think the story was a bit too boring. At first it felt interesting that I didn't know what is the main plot point, but eventually when you find out what the story is about and when it is solved, the movie gets quite boring and overall it's just a bit too confusing and hard to understand what it is meant all to be. By far one of the least good Coen films I have seen.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
JacobAug 14, 2016
Overall I enjoyed Hail Caesar! The setting was outstanding and the cast was phenomenal and I wish the film ahd given them both more to do. As it is it is still an entertaining film even with little action. Perhaps repeat viewings will give meOverall I enjoyed Hail Caesar! The setting was outstanding and the cast was phenomenal and I wish the film ahd given them both more to do. As it is it is still an entertaining film even with little action. Perhaps repeat viewings will give me more appreciation for the film and its nuances or make its flaws gape out.… Expand
1 of 3 users found this helpful12
All this user's reviews
4
CarFan1999Aug 12, 2016
Hail, Caesar is not a bad movie. If you work in the Hollywood industry or watch a lot of classic films, you might like this movie. Otherwise, this film offers little to like and is overstuffed with plots. Now I get that this is a satirical,Hail, Caesar is not a bad movie. If you work in the Hollywood industry or watch a lot of classic films, you might like this movie. Otherwise, this film offers little to like and is overstuffed with plots. Now I get that this is a satirical, humorous take and tribute to the Hollywood of yesteryear. To the movie's credit, this captures the time period / culture well and the acting is decently good. But there is nothing compelling or very interesting to attract the attention of the audience. Since there are at least 4 different plots; this means that each story is short and predicable. Do to the large amount of characters, most of them are stereotypes and not worth caring for. There is also no tension or suspense ; making the stories somewhat boring as well. Overall, this film is overstuffed with plots, rather boring, and some elements are way over the top. The only good things are that the feel of the era is well captured and and some individual scenes are quite funny. In the end; unless you're a fan of classic Hollywood; this film isn't worth watching. The 2015 film "Trumbo" did a far better job showing off the way Hollywood was back then.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
DirigiblePulpJul 29, 2016
Good fun. Full of lots of Old Hollywood homages, sly winks and nods and knowing humor. It's a movie I'm sure will be more appreciated on repeat viewings. As it is, it feels slight; not being overtly hilarious (The Big Lebowski) nor earnestlyGood fun. Full of lots of Old Hollywood homages, sly winks and nods and knowing humor. It's a movie I'm sure will be more appreciated on repeat viewings. As it is, it feels slight; not being overtly hilarious (The Big Lebowski) nor earnestly human (Raising Arizona) nor cuttingly satirical (Burn After Reading) enough to completely sell itself on its own merits.

The "Would that it were so simple" scene is an instant classic.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
mrmonsterJul 17, 2016
A little overrated, but still alright. The best part of this movie was it's great cast ensemble and interesting characters, but other than that, there is not really much to this film. I think even "worth watching" would be an overstatement.
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
HaloFeverJul 13, 2016
My wife called "Hail, Caesar!" esoteric and then left the living room. That was 25 minutes into the film. It only becomes more esoteric as it goes on. At least I can understand how some audiences will love it, and certainly the performancesMy wife called "Hail, Caesar!" esoteric and then left the living room. That was 25 minutes into the film. It only becomes more esoteric as it goes on. At least I can understand how some audiences will love it, and certainly the performances were wonderful. The film seems like part love letter to the so called "golden age" of cinema and part vanity project for all involved. It rarely seems like a good comedy or a movie with a good story. What little story exists is broken up by short vignettes of old timey hollywood movies that all end with the gritty real world of filming a hollywood movie. If you pined for a good old western, water movie, romance, homo-erotic musical, or sword and sandal flick, then "Hail, Ceaser!" has everything you love.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
TrilobiteGJul 9, 2016
"It's such a shame that the brief periods of richness are cut by scenes of unnecessary and time consuming dialogue between characters which serves no resolution, no end to danger and nothing at all. It's not even that the dialogue is bad or"It's such a shame that the brief periods of richness are cut by scenes of unnecessary and time consuming dialogue between characters which serves no resolution, no end to danger and nothing at all. It's not even that the dialogue is bad or unbearable, it's just filler for time"… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
0
WallisdjJul 2, 2016
Would someone like to explain to me why I wasted an hour-and-a-half watching this film (other than to state that I saw the film)? No plot. No characterization. It appears that a great many actors were hired and not one of them delivered aWould someone like to explain to me why I wasted an hour-and-a-half watching this film (other than to state that I saw the film)? No plot. No characterization. It appears that a great many actors were hired and not one of them delivered a performance that will be remembered as anything but the worst ever!… Expand
1 of 1 users found this helpful10
All this user's reviews
7
BrianMcCriticJun 8, 2016
While this is not a Coen Brothers classic it's also far from a dud. This love letter to old Hollywood still has some great dialogue and has terrific performances throughout. B+
2 of 5 users found this helpful23
All this user's reviews
1
csw12May 31, 2016
Hail, Caesar is a absolute pile of garbage. The worst film I've seen this year. Not funny and extremely stupid..............................................
1 of 2 users found this helpful11
All this user's reviews
5
geedupMay 29, 2016
I spent time watching this movie and if I were to explain what it was, I couldn't. not because it is so good or so "deep" but because i don't know what to call it. If the Coen bros didn't write this and if Clooney wasn't in it, I don't knowI spent time watching this movie and if I were to explain what it was, I couldn't. not because it is so good or so "deep" but because i don't know what to call it. If the Coen bros didn't write this and if Clooney wasn't in it, I don't know how it gets made. Its original. but not captivating (kept waiting for something to turn the movie into this) not interesting (kinda a plot here)...etc.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
shoulderoforionMay 19, 2016
Dug it, dug it, dug it, a movie so subtle I could see how it would bore a lot of people, I found it funny & charming. Big fan of the Coen Brothers but didn't like their last golden age Hollywood flick Barton Fink, at all, this was nothingDug it, dug it, dug it, a movie so subtle I could see how it would bore a lot of people, I found it funny & charming. Big fan of the Coen Brothers but didn't like their last golden age Hollywood flick Barton Fink, at all, this was nothing like that, and if you're in the mood for something light it's a great watch.… Expand
0 of 6 users found this helpful06
All this user's reviews
0
KITTY6May 18, 2016
Hale Ceaser !! Sorry mr Clooney and co i only paid £4 and a free cup of coffee to see this film i wish i had drank my cup of coffee and not watched the film
1 of 5 users found this helpful14
All this user's reviews
5
jblum1998May 13, 2016
Despite being a huge Coen Brother's fan I honestly didn't enjoy Hail, Caesar! as much as I thought I would...sure the acting was good, it's just such a slow-paced and extremely confusing movie. There may have been at least ONE humorous scene,Despite being a huge Coen Brother's fan I honestly didn't enjoy Hail, Caesar! as much as I thought I would...sure the acting was good, it's just such a slow-paced and extremely confusing movie. There may have been at least ONE humorous scene, but it didn't save the rest of the film.… Expand
2 of 2 users found this helpful20
All this user's reviews
7
tv12May 10, 2016
Underrated movie, Lots of very clever scenes and a good send-up of old Hollywood.Too bad it slipped under the radar. The Coen Brother always deliver intelligent films.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
4
Gamed2longMay 4, 2016
You watch this movie, and you leave feeling like it was written for someone else. But I couldn't tell you who. Its not as deep as most Coen brothers films. But there isn't much to the plot either. Its a nod to a period of Hollywood historyYou watch this movie, and you leave feeling like it was written for someone else. But I couldn't tell you who. Its not as deep as most Coen brothers films. But there isn't much to the plot either. Its a nod to a period of Hollywood history with several Coen brother idiosynchronicities woven in. There are a bunch of Hollywood's most talented actors playing bit parts. I had a good time, but there were parts of it I found strange and didn't get. Its something I would watch parts of again, if I was flipping channels on TV. I have no desire to watch it again in its entirety, and I'm a fan of the Coen brothers.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
ToffenuffMay 2, 2016
Lots of recognizable faces and big names in this, which was fun to see as they all interacted. Not much else to see here. Not as humorous as it seemed it would be, but there are definitely some funny moments. Interesting to see some of theLots of recognizable faces and big names in this, which was fun to see as they all interacted. Not much else to see here. Not as humorous as it seemed it would be, but there are definitely some funny moments. Interesting to see some of the backstage goings-on of an older movie-making era. As other reviews have stated, not much character development and neither is there a substantial plot. It was not worth seeing in the theaters.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
4
EugeneFragaMay 2, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Ancient Rome is the main backdrop to the Coens’ new movie. As usual, it is crazy, somber stuff.
However, slow paced, only sporadically funny and boring, a caper about postwar Hollywood with some magnificently realised pastiche sets. The Brothers ominous deadpan and quirky quality is present, nonetheless.
Scarlett Johansson grumpy Esther Williams-style diva is fine, but Alden Ehrenreich cowboy, Channing Tatum dancer, Frances McDormand hilarious bit and Tilda Swinton resplendent Hedda and Louella steal the scene. A recurring central-cameo of George Clooney in a Quo Vadis and Ben-Hur pantomime is disrespectful, unfunny and none-too-bright. As is the mysterious brotherhood of screenwriters calling themselves the Future. Barely watchable, disappointing Coens'.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
lucbevibrasilApr 24, 2016
There is a spectacular film, but it's a good movie. Not to laugh. If you expect to laugh, do not see this movie. If see, wait time to Johansson and Ehrenreich. Oh, if you see because of Clooney, you do not see at all.
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
NickLikesMoviesApr 17, 2016
A really fun, exciting journey that doesn't really add up to anything. It's still beautifully shot and has a load of exciting and interesting characters. Alden Ehrenreich is gold here. And the Scarlett Johannson mermaid film scene is MAGIC.A really fun, exciting journey that doesn't really add up to anything. It's still beautifully shot and has a load of exciting and interesting characters. Alden Ehrenreich is gold here. And the Scarlett Johannson mermaid film scene is MAGIC.

Just a lot of fun.… Expand
0 of 4 users found this helpful04
All this user's reviews
3
Shark_SandwichApr 15, 2016
Not very good. While Hail, Caesar! had some fun moments I just couldn't find a way to give a **** about any of the characters. I like most of the Coen brother's movies, and their good ones are fantastic, but man they can make a bad movie too.
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
2
Masked_One7240Apr 9, 2016
The plot was weak and I didn't even know what was happening throughout the movie. Extremely weak 'comedy'. A-grade cast members were also very under-used with Jonah Hill appearing for less than two minutes,Scarlett Johansson apearing in onlyThe plot was weak and I didn't even know what was happening throughout the movie. Extremely weak 'comedy'. A-grade cast members were also very under-used with Jonah Hill appearing for less than two minutes,Scarlett Johansson apearing in only two short scenes and Channing Tatum in a musical number and another short scene. The only part I really liked was the Channing Tatum musical number.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
5
ElectroNickApr 8, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Those who are looking forward to another Coen Brothers film will not be disappointed but it seems confused in its message. It is a peculiar tale of a Hollywood producer trying to get theThis review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Those who are looking forward to another Coen Brothers film will not be disappointed but it seems confused in its message. It is a peculiar tale of a Hollywood producer trying to get the ransom money to get back his lead star (played by George Clooney).The film also follows several subplots involving a southern actor trying to broaden his acting range and another with an actress (Played by Scarlett Johansson) trying to get a divorce and adopt her own daughter. The Coen Brothers are known for their witty dialouge and distinct sense of humor that is often used to illustrate a point. The main point in this film however feels lost as the message is confused. The plot with Clooney being kidnapped by communists give the idea that the actors and writers are exploited by the studios. However the message feels lost when the main protagonist scolds Clooney for his communist ideals. It feels unsure if it is a critique of Capitalism or a critique of the Hollywood blacklisting during the height of the cold war. There are also a few plot points that seen to come and go. For example, the lead Communist played by Channing Tatum turns in the studio for his own agenda but his character arc doesn't move forward after he accidentally drops the ransom money. Another subplot involving one of Eddie's friends talking about the bombs at Bikini Atoll doesn't really go anywhere. Despite the films setbacks, there are a few exceptional things about the film. For example, the cinematography gives the illusion of intimacy in the studio which makes it feel as if the studio is a character in of itself. The shots involved with the Russian submarine really show how massive the vehicle is and the use of high angle shots to effectively show the superiority of the machine over the men in the row boat. There are also some humorous moments such as the slapstick routine in the editing room and the exchange between Ralph Fiennes and Alden Ehrenreich. It is a film that is confused in its message with a few amusing moments. I could only recommend this film to those who are die-hard fans of the Coen brothers while the rest of the audience trying to get into their work are better off watching their other films such as The Big Lebowski or No Country For Old Men. Collapse… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
7
owmynose9000Apr 6, 2016
Hail, Caesar is a time capsule of classic Hollywood movie production, an era which was unique and interesting to witness. This movie was entertaining but the overall plot was not up to par with other Cohen brother films. The plot wasn't veryHail, Caesar is a time capsule of classic Hollywood movie production, an era which was unique and interesting to witness. This movie was entertaining but the overall plot was not up to par with other Cohen brother films. The plot wasn't very satisfying but this was made up for with the great set pieces and performances by the cast of characters. The satirical nature of the plot was amusing but there were scenes that did suffer from weak dialogue. It isn't a must-see but is worth watching for the uniquely entertaining format used to present an era of classic Hollywood that is supported by a great cast and characters.… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
3
KPWarriorApr 4, 2016
This film highlighted for me how far out of touch my opinions are with those of the critics. There are some great little sketches in the film replicating some of the classic movie genres of the era. However the linking together of pieces isThis film highlighted for me how far out of touch my opinions are with those of the critics. There are some great little sketches in the film replicating some of the classic movie genres of the era. However the linking together of pieces is awful. There is no character development and many of the story threads are wasted or just left hanging in mid air. My worst film of the year.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
2
pythag0rasApr 3, 2016
what the hell was that ?? IMDB had this listed as a comedy. Not a single laugh in there.. A real flop for the "talented" cohen bros. Even if I took the movie into another context (drama , mystery, etc) it was still so utterly boring . Thewhat the hell was that ?? IMDB had this listed as a comedy. Not a single laugh in there.. A real flop for the "talented" cohen bros. Even if I took the movie into another context (drama , mystery, etc) it was still so utterly boring . The pointless musical interludes were no help either. Terrible flic and not worth the time IMO.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
6
WheelzFourReelzMar 29, 2016
There is a lot to like here. The performances are great, the cinematography is gorgeous, the humor is well-timed, and the filming of these movies are phenomenal. However, the story is such a sloppy, inconsistent mess, that it's tough toThere is a lot to like here. The performances are great, the cinematography is gorgeous, the humor is well-timed, and the filming of these movies are phenomenal. However, the story is such a sloppy, inconsistent mess, that it's tough to wholeheartedly recommend this one.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
oDjentoMar 27, 2016
Hail Caesar! Has gotten quite a bit of hate that I don’t believe it deserves, but I will admit it is one of the Coen Brothers weaker films.
The film is a throwback to the ‘golden age’ of cinema, and the film deals with the perception ofHail Caesar! Has gotten quite a bit of hate that I don’t believe it deserves, but I will admit it is one of the Coen Brothers weaker films.
The film is a throwback to the ‘golden age’ of cinema, and the film deals with the perception of their actors in which most people were told what to do not only with their careers but with their lifestyle. Josh Brolin’s character (Eddie Mannix) is the man who tries to hold it all together and wants to keep everything on a tight timescale (evident by the frequent use of his watch and time throughout the film). The film is also just a chance for the Coen Brothers to have fun and show off their film knowledge in the industry; and you can see how much fun each actor is having.
George Clooney is to be quite honest really just a McGuffin for the film, but he is still great in his role, Josh Brolin is pretty enjoyable too, and Ralph Fiennes is hilarious and brilliant as he is in almost everything but the actor that really steals the show is Alden Ehrenreich as Hobie Doyle. His character is loveable, hilariously unaware be a very caring and polite man. He may not be the best actor but he tries his best at adapting from his typical western films of little dialogue to a period drama and really wants to do well but he just can’t. Seriously, if there is any reason to go see this film it is for the scene between Alden and Ralph. It is a hysterical scene.
The film has a bundle of jokes but I feel many viewers may not fully get all of them as a lot of them are orientated around the jargon of the film industry. The film also references a lot of film industry trivia; for instance the film columnists who are based on real people and the scene in which Frances McDormund almost chokes herself to death on a film reel which references an actual person who died whilst their scarf got caught up in a film reel.
The films plot is debateable on how legitimate it actually is and does become a little too confusing getting towards the end but the script does allow for some hilariously entertaining scenes. Every actor is on point here but the best in the film are absolutely Alden and Ralph. If you are a big film industry buff you have to check this out but its downfall is definitely in how limited an audience can enjoy this. I enjoyed the film but I must admit it isn’t as consistent as other Coen Brother films and is quite inaccessible but there is definitely some people who will love this film and is probably going to gather a larger cult following later on in its life.
6.4/10… Expand
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
5
nicholas_lindenMar 22, 2016
This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Those who are looking forward to another Coen Brothers film will not be disappointed but it seems confused in its message. It is a peculiar tale of a Hollywood producer trying to get the ransom money to get back his lead star (played by George Clooney).The film also follows several subplots involving a southern actor trying to broaden his acting range and another with an actress (Played by Scarlett Johansson) trying to get a divorce and adopt her own daughter. The Coen Brothers are known for their witty dialouge and distinct sense of humor that is often used to illustrate a point. The main point in this film however feels lost as the message is confused. The plot with Clooney being kidnapped by communists give the idea that the actors and writers are exploited by the studios. However the message feels lost when the main protagonist scolds Clooney for his communist ideals. It feels unsure if it is a critique of Capitalism or a critique of the Hollywood blacklisting during the height of the cold war. There are also a few plot points that seen to come and go. For example, the lead Communist played by Channing Tatum turns in the studio for his own agenda but his character arc doesn't move forward after he accidentally drops the ransom money. Another subplot involving one of Eddie's friends talking about the bombs at Bikini Atoll doesn't really go anywhere. Despite the films setbacks, there are a few exceptional things about the film. For example, the cinematography gives the illusion of intimacy in the studio which makes it feel as if the studio is a character in of itself. The shots involved with the Russian submarine really show how massive the vehicle is and the use of high angle shots to effectively show the superiority of the machine over the men in the row boat. There are also some humorous moments such as the slapstick routine in the editing room and the exchange between Ralph Fiennes and Alden Ehrenreich. It is a film that is confused in its message with a few amusing moments. I could only recommend this film to those who are die-hard fans of the Coen brothers while the rest of the audience trying to get into their work are better off watching their other films such as The Big Lebowski or No Country For Old Men.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
5
foxgroveMar 16, 2016
The most disappointing thing about ‘Hail Caesar!’ is that it had the potential to be a very funny pastiche of Hollywood’s golden age, and indeed the moments involving movie making recreations are sublime indeed. The problem is that the twoThe most disappointing thing about ‘Hail Caesar!’ is that it had the potential to be a very funny pastiche of Hollywood’s golden age, and indeed the moments involving movie making recreations are sublime indeed. The problem is that the two main threads of the story are just not worthy of the incidental pleasures that the rest of the movie affords. The characters of Eddie Mannix and Baird Whitlock, played by Josh Brolin and George Clooney as a troubled studio head and kidnapped star respectively, are just not given the material to make their characters anything but dull, despite their perfectly respectable efforts. The film is basically too loosely written to gel properly into a satisfactory whole and it is definitely not as funny as it should be. Inspired moments peppered throughout enable a game supporting cast to try and salvage a film that is resolutely skewered to following the boring story arcs of Brolin and Clooney. Scarlett Johansson, Tilda Swinton and Ralph Fiennes all register strongly, but it is Channing Tatum and Alden Ehrenreich who steal the show. Tatum is dazzlingly fabulous in his big song and dance number demonstrating a talent I don’t think anyone could have imagined. And as Hobie Doyle, the dumb star of countless westerns making his transition to drama, Ehrenrich presents us with the most enjoyable and fully rounded character in the film. More of him and less of Brolin and Clooney would have been advantageous and most welcome. The film’s biggest laugh out loud moment, though, is reserved for Frances McDormand’s editor, C C Calhoun, whose one scene unwittingly, but deliciously, brings to mind Isadora Duncan. The film is finely crafted in all areas but especially in costume and production design. Their contributions add to the scenes recreating the movie making process which are undoubtedly the highlights of an otherwise very uneven film.… Expand
3 of 3 users found this helpful30
All this user's reviews
3
MotojohnnoMar 13, 2016
Decided to see this because it's a Coen bros movie. Yes; great cast; Yes; fabulous period detail, sets etc. Yes, nice concept. HOWEVER....it's not actually very funny. Perhaps I was negatively influenced by the elderly ladies next to me whoDecided to see this because it's a Coen bros movie. Yes; great cast; Yes; fabulous period detail, sets etc. Yes, nice concept. HOWEVER....it's not actually very funny. Perhaps I was negatively influenced by the elderly ladies next to me who giggled inanely and incessantly through every scene. But, seriously most scenes warrant a couple of smiles at best. Josh Brolin is perfect, as is Alden Ehrenreich. Clooney is good as a grinning buffoon (if that's what amuses you). Tilda Swinton does a great job with her one-dimensional character. The cast is largely wasted. Scarlett Johansson shows huge promise but gets only short scenes. Ralph Fiennes is treated the same way - a terrible waste. Don't be fooled by the fawning critics' reviews.… Expand
6 of 8 users found this helpful62
All this user's reviews
4
BingBongMar 13, 2016
I went to watch this with high hopes, and the first 30 minutes were great, actually had me laughing at one point. And then it just slowed down and began meandering along, like an amiable, slightly drunk uncle after a good meal wandering roundI went to watch this with high hopes, and the first 30 minutes were great, actually had me laughing at one point. And then it just slowed down and began meandering along, like an amiable, slightly drunk uncle after a good meal wandering round the garden looking for somewhere to rest his weary bones. Mind you, I've often noticed this with the Coen's work. Start off with zip and inventiveness and then run out of steam and become unnecessarily wordy. 'No country for old men,' for example, and 'burn after reading.' Only, TBH, this last was pretty flat from the getgo.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
8
DanBurritoMar 13, 2016
Hail, Caesar may be a little bit underwhelming in some aspects, but it's a very entertaining film with great set pieces and a committed cast. The movie's main flaw was its somewhat slow pace - I felt it needed a bit more energy. And theHail, Caesar may be a little bit underwhelming in some aspects, but it's a very entertaining film with great set pieces and a committed cast. The movie's main flaw was its somewhat slow pace - I felt it needed a bit more energy. And the kidnapping of Clooney's character didn't seem necessary to the plot. But all complaints aside, I enjoyed it very much. The scenes on the various set pieces of the various films were easily the best. George Clooney was in top form, and the rest of the cast were great too. Josh Brolin played his character well, with Scarlett Johansson, Alden Ehrenreich and Ralph Fiennes to name a few turning in highly impressive supporting performances. The production design was amazing. They deserve an Oscar for that. FINAL VERDICT: Hail, Caesar may prove frustrating to some (and you probably need to be a movie-buff to fully appreciate it) but it's a solid Coen Brothers flick and an affectionate, humorous tribute to Hollywood's golden age that should satisfy fans of old cinema. 7.5/10.… Expand
3 of 11 users found this helpful38
All this user's reviews
7
al_dszMar 12, 2016
This is not the best Coen Bros film, but still a good one to watch. The cinematography in the film is brilliant and the set pieces and look and feel of 1950s Hollywood is brilliantly captured. However the let down is the plot, there isn'tThis is not the best Coen Bros film, but still a good one to watch. The cinematography in the film is brilliant and the set pieces and look and feel of 1950s Hollywood is brilliantly captured. However the let down is the plot, there isn't much to it and the 'payoff' at the end seems quite insubstantial for the plot build-up. There is also one subplot (out of a few) that seemed a bit pointless and didn't really add much to the main storyline.

The film has a lot of silly and funnily penned characters though and good performances by all the actors. It's a shame that the storyline and writing didn't do these characters and the overall film much justice.… Expand
0 of 5 users found this helpful05
All this user's reviews
6
YellowKirbyMar 12, 2016
While certainly enjoyable, 'Hail, Caesar!' failed to live up to my expectations, as it not only produced less laughs than I expected, but also underused some of its greatest and most interesting characters and set-pieces. The plot seemed lazyWhile certainly enjoyable, 'Hail, Caesar!' failed to live up to my expectations, as it not only produced less laughs than I expected, but also underused some of its greatest and most interesting characters and set-pieces. The plot seemed lazy and wore thin after a while, and the best scenes are those on the sets of the movies within the movie.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
1
HonestjonMar 12, 2016
On the way to the cinema with the wife and she asks "is there anything else on, other than Deadpool? I don't feel in the mood for a sweary,violent film, I'd rather watch a comedy" ......or something like that. So I did a quick search ofOn the way to the cinema with the wife and she asks "is there anything else on, other than Deadpool? I don't feel in the mood for a sweary,violent film, I'd rather watch a comedy" ......or something like that. So I did a quick search of listings and noticed Hail, Caesar! I checked reviews and Mark Kermode absolutely waxed lyrical. Sold! We left early. worst film I've ever seen.. Filled with stars but just not funny… Expand
3 of 5 users found this helpful32
All this user's reviews
6
Unladenswallow0Mar 9, 2016
I liked the satire the most, thats where the film actually became enjoyable, especially the parts where they take jabs at the role of directors and actors. Parts of the film were actually funny, without trying to hard to be, which is great.I liked the satire the most, thats where the film actually became enjoyable, especially the parts where they take jabs at the role of directors and actors. Parts of the film were actually funny, without trying to hard to be, which is great. The majority of the movie was a meandering mess though, i didnt know where the hell it was going for the most part. When the Baltic black communist submarine came up out of the ocean to pick up Channing Tatum i soon began to realize that i may have had a stroke. The story itself was just weak, even when you make sense of it. A stronger writing board, with the same directorial set would have made this movie a hell of a lot more enjoyable than it was.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
7
themovieguy123Mar 9, 2016
I don't get the message of the movie, at first i thought it was something to do Communism but i still have no clue. The trailer led me to think there was a lot of humor in this movie and they were not lying but its not humor i got but i foundI don't get the message of the movie, at first i thought it was something to do Communism but i still have no clue. The trailer led me to think there was a lot of humor in this movie and they were not lying but its not humor i got but i found that the elderly in my cinema enjoyed in very much. Don't get me wrong i laughed a couple of times. Overall i found this movie is nothing compared to other Coen Brothers films.… Expand
0 of 6 users found this helpful06
All this user's reviews
7
beingryanjudeMar 7, 2016
Just as many Coen Bros. films, HAIL, CAESAR! is funny, genuine and nothing short of an exciting glimpse into Hollywood during the Golden Age of cinema. The film consistently references the past - if the jokes go over your head, this may beJust as many Coen Bros. films, HAIL, CAESAR! is funny, genuine and nothing short of an exciting glimpse into Hollywood during the Golden Age of cinema. The film consistently references the past - if the jokes go over your head, this may be why. Overall, gorgeous looking - and a heck of a cast.… Expand
0 of 5 users found this helpful05
All this user's reviews
10
mrtickleMar 7, 2016
Hail, Caesar! has a dry, deadpan humour to it that is like all Coen brothers films. And like many other Coen brothers films it has a surreal and abstract quality to it too. The story and theme is not clear at first, but it is a film to makeHail, Caesar! has a dry, deadpan humour to it that is like all Coen brothers films. And like many other Coen brothers films it has a surreal and abstract quality to it too. The story and theme is not clear at first, but it is a film to make you think, and once you realise what the film is about (hint: faith and the role you play in life) Hail, Caesar! becomes a film that is both a lover letter to 50's Hollywood and a deeper look at how a man trying to chose between taking a job that is easy but boring, or a job that is hard, muddled yet far more interesting.… Expand
0 of 9 users found this helpful09
All this user's reviews
0
DeclanDMar 6, 2016
It's been a while since I've seen a film this grotesquely bad, and the first time in my life I have ever walked out the cinema before the end to demand my money back, not only that but it has made me feel the need to create a metacriticIt's been a while since I've seen a film this grotesquely bad, and the first time in my life I have ever walked out the cinema before the end to demand my money back, not only that but it has made me feel the need to create a metacritic account to save any poor souls who may think about seeing this film. My mother even fell asleep during the film. Not only does this 'film' suffer from being incredibly boring, with little to no plot, but it creates so many film travesties. The acting is well, rather poor, but I feel they did this on purpose for some stupid inside joke. The characters are less than 1 dimensional, the humor was embarrassing, we had huge moments of silence during the (mostly slapstick) 'comedy' segments in the cinema. I can't even pick apart the plot of this film because it did not have one.

The largest culprit was these stupid scenes where they would introduce a largely pointless character mid way through the movie or near the end, who would have a flamboyant, nearly 15 minute entrance, then that was it for them, or they appeared later in the movie to tie up some half assed plot point which made no sense.

Please save your money, watch something else or save it by doing literally anything else. This was barely even a film, it was just people moving around poorly interconnected by half assed writing and scenes.… Expand
4 of 6 users found this helpful42
All this user's reviews
7
Rebecca31Mar 4, 2016
An arthouse movie by Joel and Ethan Coen, set in 1950s Hollywood, starring Josh Brolin, George Clooney, Ralph Fiennes and the list goes on. This might divide people significantly but if you want to see a throwback to the Golden Age of cinema,An arthouse movie by Joel and Ethan Coen, set in 1950s Hollywood, starring Josh Brolin, George Clooney, Ralph Fiennes and the list goes on. This might divide people significantly but if you want to see a throwback to the Golden Age of cinema, fantastic acting, beautiful shots and set pieces, and Channing-Potato-Face-Tatum singing and dancing in a sailor suit (I could have happily lived the rest of my life without that last one but it's too late now). I personally enjoyed this, but it's no Fargo. Let me put it this way, if you're the type of person who hasn't heard of the Coen Brothers then you might want to give this a miss, but for everyone else it’s a definite recommendation.… Expand
1 of 6 users found this helpful15
All this user's reviews
6
NerdConsultantMar 3, 2016
Hail Caesar is a rather well made movie but has rather an under developed script which is what really holds it back. The performances are all good even though most of the cast don’t get much to do and honestly it feels too short and it feelsHail Caesar is a rather well made movie but has rather an under developed script which is what really holds it back. The performances are all good even though most of the cast don’t get much to do and honestly it feels too short and it feels like it could have easily gone on longer. The film does have an excellent production design and is a perfect tribute to 1950’s cinema but I felt it could have given us more. The Coen brothers can make movies that have less structure and more just exist to be movies like The Big Lebowski, but I kind of preferred their more structured works like No Country For Old Men and True Grit where they are being kept on a leash because of their source material, when they are left on their own like they are with this movie, I think they can often go a bit too far, however on this occasion, I don’t think they go far enough and it reeks of them trying to bite off more than they could chew.

It’s not totally bad, this will be a very interesting film to watch on NetFlix on a movie night with your friends and you won’t come out hating it, a couple of moments really made me laugh. The film can be very entertaining at times which is a credit, it just doesn’t measure up to a perfect whole. Wait for it to come out on DVD and get it on a rental.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
8
BenedictusMar 1, 2016
I really, really enjoy Coen brother films but I was near to ambivalent about watching this one due to the mixed reviews - and some statements to the tone of it not being like the other Coen brother films. Both me and my partner found a lot ofI really, really enjoy Coen brother films but I was near to ambivalent about watching this one due to the mixed reviews - and some statements to the tone of it not being like the other Coen brother films. Both me and my partner found a lot of the scenes laugh-out-loud funny and really enjoyed high quality charismatic performances from great actors. It's visually beautiful as well and, I think, a film with great heart, like all Coen brother films.… Expand
0 of 8 users found this helpful08
All this user's reviews
4
Jess_HillFeb 28, 2016
This was a disappointing film which is difficult to categorise, as it's comprised of a series of self-aware film cliches strung together in an attempt to form some kind of meta commentary on the nature of film itself (I think). There areThis was a disappointing film which is difficult to categorise, as it's comprised of a series of self-aware film cliches strung together in an attempt to form some kind of meta commentary on the nature of film itself (I think). There are laughs to be had, but only as a result of singular sequences, the storyline being too esoteric to enjoy in a broader sense. The performances, really just a sequence of cameos, are good but contrived, caricature rather than substantive. An oddity without substance. 4.02/10… Expand
3 of 4 users found this helpful31
All this user's reviews
3
yezoFeb 27, 2016
The movie is not great. The script and story is boring and uninteresting. To give it some credit, part of the movie is funny but not in intellectual level but like clown funny which is disappointing.
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
4
McGillotineFeb 26, 2016
The Coen Brothers sure do a hell of a job, accomplishing nothing in Hail Caesar, from characters to general plot and progression, there is a serious lack of substance within the film leading way to excessive confusion and boredom. It alsoThe Coen Brothers sure do a hell of a job, accomplishing nothing in Hail Caesar, from characters to general plot and progression, there is a serious lack of substance within the film leading way to excessive confusion and boredom. It also holds my record for most people to walk out on a film accumulating half the cinema getting up to refund their tickets, which surprisingly became more entertaining than the movie itself.

Now if you are planning to watch this movie please help yourself, to these few things to better your experience. 1st. hit yourself with an adrenaline shot before the film, so you don't have ushers trying to wake you 5 hours after the movie has ended 2nd. Sticky tape your eyebrows to your forehead, because with the brief screen time some actors have, you will have missed them in the time it take to blink and 3rd and finally don't go in with any expectations at all or you will be guaranteed to be disapointed

Now where credits is due is to Brolin and Ehrenreich who make the most of the films pretentious script whereas every other actor and actress who shares a piece of the small spotlight seemed to have had a care factor of zero, when reading the weak and intolerable screenplay. Written with the same amount of care and consideration involved in trying to to miss the toilet seat while peeing.

Hail Caesar, isn't funny it isn't intelligent and most of the struggle behind the movie is trying to figure out exactly what it was supposed to be.… Expand
2 of 3 users found this helpful21
All this user's reviews
2
mnbykjakFeb 24, 2016
This movie was novel, in a kooky kind of Coen Bros. way. But, unlike some of their other movies, for example Oh Brother Where Art Thou?, it was incredibly boring. My husband will watch almost any movie, but even he went to refill his soda!This movie was novel, in a kooky kind of Coen Bros. way. But, unlike some of their other movies, for example Oh Brother Where Art Thou?, it was incredibly boring. My husband will watch almost any movie, but even he went to refill his soda! Other than some incredible dancing from Channing Tatum and a beautiful synchronized swimming scene, I was so bored. How this can be called a "mystery" movie I have no clue. There was zero tension and intrigue.… Expand
2 of 4 users found this helpful22
All this user's reviews
5
AliceofXFeb 23, 2016
Well, this was confusing. Somewhere underneath there is a smart story that is unfortunately buried under several plot threads and a revolving door of characters that come and go before you have a chance to know them. Even the main leads don'tWell, this was confusing. Somewhere underneath there is a smart story that is unfortunately buried under several plot threads and a revolving door of characters that come and go before you have a chance to know them. Even the main leads don't leave much of an impression on you and nobody's story is really fleshed out.

That's my biggest problem is just how short this movie feels. It's like a 2+ hour film that got cut to just the basics of the story. It all feels rushed and hasty.

But Hail, Caesar is not all bad. It's an entertaining film with great humour and many laugh out loud scenes. It has a story with some interesting metaphors about religion. An okay film, in short. But since it's the Coen brothers you naturally expect something more. At least something that isn't a confusing mess.

I would only recommend this film to people who are already fans of the Coen brothers style. If you are one of them this film might of be of interest to you, but I'm not sure what it would do to anyone else. Overall it is a mediocre film.… Expand
0 of 0 users found this helpful00
All this user's reviews
9
MovieInsiderFeb 22, 2016
Wow just...WOW. This amazing film by Ethan & Joel Coen was a piece of movie literature. A historical fiction film of movie studio named CAPITAL STUDIO. this studio is ran by Eddie Mannix (Josh Brolin) a stern family man...well at least whenWow just...WOW. This amazing film by Ethan & Joel Coen was a piece of movie literature. A historical fiction film of movie studio named CAPITAL STUDIO. this studio is ran by Eddie Mannix (Josh Brolin) a stern family man...well at least when he's at home. Josh Brolin's character has to deal with the mysterious disappearance of Baird Whitlock (George Clooney), AND at the same time he deals with all the actors, editing, stages, and angry directors. Although if you wanted to se a specific actor such as Scarlett Johansson or especially Jonah Hill and Ralph Fiennes. you are unfortunately out of luck.If you want to see a real picture, see this movie. But if your into action and adventure, some of this may come to your liking, but don't over pay for tickets… Expand
0 of 9 users found this helpful09
All this user's reviews
0
JJPingFeb 22, 2016
Joel and Ethan...please confess your intentions to purposely write a horrible script and then load up the cast with A-Listers, only to get rave reviews... just to prove the general public is moronic. I've always enjoyed Coen Bros. movies andJoel and Ethan...please confess your intentions to purposely write a horrible script and then load up the cast with A-Listers, only to get rave reviews... just to prove the general public is moronic. I've always enjoyed Coen Bros. movies and "got" them, but this one is simply awful. I honestly think it was a test to see if they could successfully pull the wool over peoples eyes.… Expand
6 of 8 users found this helpful62
All this user's reviews
8
TributeManFeb 20, 2016
Ave, Cohen!

Bracia Cohen po raz kolejny utrzymują mnie w przekonaniu, że są jednymi z najlepszych reżyserów w historii. Ich najnowsze dzieło opowiada historie producenta (27 godzin z jego życia), który stara się wypaść jak najlepiej wAve, Cohen!

Bracia Cohen po raz kolejny utrzymują mnie w przekonaniu, że są jednymi z najlepszych reżyserów w historii. Ich najnowsze dzieło opowiada historie producenta (27 godzin z jego życia), który stara się wypaść jak najlepiej w swojej pracy. Do tego ukazane jest jak działa machina zwana Hollywoodem.
Niestety nie mogę polecić każdemu tego filmu. Jest to najbardziej specyficzny film Cohenów i co za tym idzie zbiera bardzo złe opinie. Może dlatego, że dzisiejsze filmy przyzwyczaiły nas do prostych historii z kompletnie nie złożonymi bohaterami. Śmieszą mnie te wszystkie recenzje gdzie pisze się o braku logiki albo że nic nie jest jasne. To smutne jak bardzo ludzie odzwyczaili się od prawdziwego Kina.… Expand
0 of 7 users found this helpful07
All this user's reviews
7
marcmyworksFeb 20, 2016
If not for some minor casting errors I would say this is a fully realised film. The Coen Brothers are masters at creating reality in small and intense situations. Though not a lot of the film is really necessary for the major plot, it createsIf not for some minor casting errors I would say this is a fully realised film. The Coen Brothers are masters at creating reality in small and intense situations. Though not a lot of the film is really necessary for the major plot, it creates different points of humour and interest in the main characters reality.… Expand
0 of 5 users found this helpful05
All this user's reviews
9
NBNEFeb 20, 2016
Excellent. Great retrospective of and farce about the studio era. There's much to mine if you keep alert with the dialogue and multiple plot lines. A lot of fun.
2 of 11 users found this helpful29
All this user's reviews
0
FizzMoFeb 20, 2016
The only movie ever that rivals Ice Pirates for awfulness. There is literally nothing else to say. What any critic saw in this, I'm not sure. I can only assume they were ashamed to pan a film with Clooney in it.
4 of 6 users found this helpful42
All this user's reviews
6
netflicFeb 17, 2016
Overall, the movie is at times amusing but not memorable. Definitely, not one of the best produced by Coen brothers. For people closely familiar with Hollywood it should be a lot of fun though.
0 of 2 users found this helpful02
All this user's reviews
0
freviewsFeb 17, 2016
This movie was supposed to be a comedy???? Than why did they put all the funny parts in the trailer????? Why do they even have the blonde haired lady in the movie, it doesn't make sense, it doesn't relate to the overarching plot, so why???? IThis movie was supposed to be a comedy???? Than why did they put all the funny parts in the trailer????? Why do they even have the blonde haired lady in the movie, it doesn't make sense, it doesn't relate to the overarching plot, so why???? I do NOT want to see this movie ever again in my life!!!!… Expand
4 of 6 users found this helpful42
All this user's reviews
0
Acehack1Feb 16, 2016
Please do not waste you time with this movie!!. We walked out with others behind us. Felt sorry for the ones we left behind. Mass confusion nothing seemed to fit together. Very boring with nothing being said for lengths of time. WaitPlease do not waste you time with this movie!!. We walked out with others behind us. Felt sorry for the ones we left behind. Mass confusion nothing seemed to fit together. Very boring with nothing being said for lengths of time. Wait until it comes out on DVD and you'll cuss yourself for ever renting it.… Expand
4 of 6 users found this helpful42
All this user's reviews
6
moviemitch96Feb 16, 2016
I must admit that this was a very odd and uneven film. Despite promises from critics that film buffs such as myself and those familiar with Hollywood's golden age would enjoy this film, I really thought that it could've turned out a lotI must admit that this was a very odd and uneven film. Despite promises from critics that film buffs such as myself and those familiar with Hollywood's golden age would enjoy this film, I really thought that it could've turned out a lot better. Granted, there are some worthwhile performances from the A-list all-star cast, but even they weren't enough to make the film any better. And while the film was certainly meant to be a comedy and I did let out a chuckle or two, I found most of it to be very bland and straightforward. Overall, this is just another sign to me that the Coen Bros. are more or less losing their touch.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
0
AthosmrFeb 15, 2016
This was one of the worst movies I have ever seen. Going in, my wife & I both thought it would be funny. It wasn't close. We thought about walking out several times but since we had paid to see it, we hoped it would get better. It didn't.This was one of the worst movies I have ever seen. Going in, my wife & I both thought it would be funny. It wasn't close. We thought about walking out several times but since we had paid to see it, we hoped it would get better. It didn't. It was dry, it was boring (I nearly fell asleep a few times), it was disjointed & hard to follow. For a movie that had so many stars, it fell flat as a pancake.… Expand
4 of 6 users found this helpful42
All this user's reviews
4
marklaing1Feb 15, 2016
With young kids, 6 and 4, my wife and I struggle to go out to see big screen films these days so it's doubly tiresome when we hit a dud. The old couple sitting to the right of us must have been teenagers during the movie's time period andWith young kids, 6 and 4, my wife and I struggle to go out to see big screen films these days so it's doubly tiresome when we hit a dud. The old couple sitting to the right of us must have been teenagers during the movie's time period and the wife fell asleep. Twice, snoring loudly. I thought Clooney was in the wrong part. The younger player were great. The movie was a mess, compare it to the dark humor of The Player and you'll see why. Ghastly with some great moments. But a series of vignettes, set pieces to what purpose. Sleep.… Expand
4 of 4 users found this helpful40
All this user's reviews
6
jg63Feb 14, 2016
Great production numbers and cinematography, but the plot is very thin. Clooney is wasted, so is Johansson. Then again, so was Tatum. All are great talents who could have been used much more effectively with a deeper plot. Brolin wasGreat production numbers and cinematography, but the plot is very thin. Clooney is wasted, so is Johansson. Then again, so was Tatum. All are great talents who could have been used much more effectively with a deeper plot. Brolin was great. Great pieces looking for a great movie to be in.… Expand
0 of 1 users found this helpful01
All this user's reviews
0
BeingrealFeb 14, 2016
This was one of the worst movies I've ever wasted my time watching, Save your money! We actually left during the movie... it was that bad. Thanks Carmike Cinemas for the rain check.
5 of 10 users found this helpful55
All this user's reviews
8
GinaKFeb 14, 2016
I went to this film with my sister who has an encyclopedic knowledge of Hollywood lore. She loved this film and I give it an 8 in her honor. She said to me later, “I guess you don’t know what Dashiell Hammett looked like” (all the actorsI went to this film with my sister who has an encyclopedic knowledge of Hollywood lore. She loved this film and I give it an 8 in her honor. She said to me later, “I guess you don’t know what Dashiell Hammett looked like” (all the actors playing the kidnappers were chosen to look like famous “studio”-connected people of the era). She also reminded me that Loretta Young adopted her own child (fathered by Clark Gable), just like an actress in the film almost does, and told me about the rumors that Eddie Mannix (who really existed) supposedly had George Reeves (Superman) murdered because of his affair with Mannix’s promiscuous wife, most of whose affairs he tolerated. So I can see why many critics had high praise for this film. I thought the film was fun, but I yawned a lot at times, luckily not as loudly as a man behind us. But if you know all the old stories, you’ll love this film.… Expand
2 of 11 users found this helpful29
All this user's reviews
10
BobacriticFeb 14, 2016
Hail, Caesar!
Hail, Caesar! 2016
★★★★★ Added Listing everything this movie is "about" would be an exercise in absurdity (although that's kind of fitting, considering that most of--if not all of--the Coens' movies are exercises inHail, Caesar!
Hail, Caesar! 2016
★★★★★ Added

Listing everything this movie is "about" would be an exercise in absurdity (although that's kind of fitting, considering that most of--if not all of--the Coens' movies are exercises in absurdity). Need more time to digest this, but it's genius. A meta movie that plays like a series of movies-within-movies, whilst never getting so caught up in itself that you forget that you're watching a single film unto itself. That's the structural/stylistic approach of Hail, Caesar!, but I need to sleep on it before I can attempt to verbally lay out its thematic density.… Expand
0 of 11 users found this helpful011
All this user's reviews
0
JosephjwinFeb 14, 2016
Took my gf to see this at Willoughby Commons 16 in Northeast Ohio on Feb 13th. We both almost fell asleep at this horrendously boring movie. We were both waiting for something to happen where the movie might pick up pace and some form ofTook my gf to see this at Willoughby Commons 16 in Northeast Ohio on Feb 13th. We both almost fell asleep at this horrendously boring movie. We were both waiting for something to happen where the movie might pick up pace and some form of understanding might become of this pathetic plot, but nothing the movie offered muttered the slightest hint of entertainment. After over and hour and 20 minutes of time we will never get back in our lives, we finally walked out and got a refund for this insult to great films abroad. Please, don't waste your money!!!!… Expand
4 of 9 users found this helpful45
All this user's reviews
0
YarkerFeb 13, 2016
Worst movie I have ever seen. Wish I could get money and time back! Would give a minus rating if that was an option. Whole theatre boo'd at the end. Not worth watching...
4 of 11 users found this helpful47
All this user's reviews
10
vicyamusicgreatFeb 13, 2016
Odd coincidence that at this very time I'm reading a book that is strikingly similar to this film: Dickens' Little Dorrit; both are scathing reviews; the film a screed of an indictment of Hollywood and its misfits from the near-mid-20thOdd coincidence that at this very time I'm reading a book that is strikingly similar to this film: Dickens' Little Dorrit; both are scathing reviews; the film a screed of an indictment of Hollywood and its misfits from the near-mid-20th century, the novel a screed of an indictment, just as colorful I might add, of London "society" and its most unfortunate misfits, mid 19th century. Both are brilliant!… Expand
0 of 8 users found this helpful08
All this user's reviews
0
OhgodthatmovieFeb 12, 2016
Awful waste of time. One of the worst films to start out 2016 with. It goes no where. Don't watch it. It's a waste of money. The reason i made this account. Good day :)
6 of 10 users found this helpful64
All this user's reviews
0
kaminFeb 12, 2016
This is one of the worst movies ever and caused me to write my first review on Metacritic after many years of relying on it for user reviews. This felt like the Hollywood inside culture of private humor that only the so-called elite actorsThis is one of the worst movies ever and caused me to write my first review on Metacritic after many years of relying on it for user reviews. This felt like the Hollywood inside culture of private humor that only the so-called elite actors of a closed niche group could be admitted. I only went to see it to appease a family member. Just a film to fill the egos of all who acted in it and who created this complete piece of garbage. Of course some of the so-called movie critics like it. They are in the tank for the people in the film personally and politically.… Expand
6 of 10 users found this helpful64
All this user's reviews
0
sidfalcoFeb 11, 2016
Easily one of the worst movies I have ever seen. All of the "funny" bits - actually not funny at all - are in the trailer. The rest of the movie is an embarrassment, with the exception of Josh Brolin, who is good in a meaningless and boringEasily one of the worst movies I have ever seen. All of the "funny" bits - actually not funny at all - are in the trailer. The rest of the movie is an embarrassment, with the exception of Josh Brolin, who is good in a meaningless and boring role.

I'm sure even the Coen brothers know it sucks, hence the voiceover - meaningless, intermittent and a sure sign that it would have been even worse without it - difficult - and made even less sense - more difficult.

Dreadful beyond words, save your money.… Expand
9 of 13 users found this helpful94
All this user's reviews
prev
Page:
More From This Movie

72 Critic Reviews

6.0 User Reviews

Details & Credits|Trailers

Current Movie Releases
By MetascoreBy User Score
1 81 28 Years Later: The Bone Temple
2 77 Project Hail Mary
3 75 Send Help
4 73 Hoppers
5 72 The Sheep Detectives
SEE ALL
Essential Links
New on Amazon Prime Video
New on Netflix
Coming Soon to DVD/Blu-ray
SEE ALL